Beckett/Philosophy Ed. by Matthew Feldman and Karim Mamdani (Review)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beckett/Philosophy Ed. by Matthew Feldman and Karim Mamdani (Review) Beckett/Philosophy ed. by Matthew Feldman and Karim Mamdani (review) Andre Furlani Modernism/modernity, Volume 20, Number 3, September 2013, pp. 599-601 (Review) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2013.0080 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/525179 [ Access provided at 25 Sep 2021 13:21 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] book reviews (495). The use of traditional forms such as the sonnet is not to be equated with a conservative 599 formalism, as Alan Gillis illustrates with the witty opening of his chapter on modern Irish sonnet sequences: “‘I’m up to my bollox in sonnets’, says Spenser. Or, at least, Brendan Kennelly’s ver- sion of Spenser in Cromwell” (567). Paul Muldoon can make the sonnet do weird and wonderful postmodernist work. Even in a volume as capacious as the Oxford Handbook, there are gaps. There is a limited amount on Eavan Boland’s poetry as against her influential criticism, very little on Tom Paulin or on Paula Meehan, nothing on Harry Clifton, currently Ireland Professor of Poetry. There seems to be a slight imbalance in favor of Northern Irish writers and of a younger emergent generation of poets. The inclusion of dates of birth and death would have been helpful for the volume as a reference work. But these are minor grumbles. This is an enormously rich and valuable guide to the great diversity of modern Irish poetic achievement, a book that will help all readers to appreciate just what an achievement that has been. Beckett/Philosophy. Matthew Feldman and Karim Mamdani, eds. Sophia: University Press St. Klimrnt Ohridski, 2012. Pp. xv + 323. $34.00 (cloth). Reviewed by Andre Furlani, Concordia University Montreal “I am not a philosopher,” Samuel Beckett told an interviewer. What other modern writer has felt pressed to make such a disavowal? Not even T. S. Eliot, who had studied at Harvard to become one. The very depth of the literary imprint of Beckett’s engagement with philosophy, which this rewarding anthology confirms and clarifies, wrested the denial from him. “Beckett seems the most philosophical of writers in both his ‘early’ and ‘mature’ (postwar) work,” Matthew Feldman says in the book’s introduction (3). No qualification is necessary. Beckett read Schopenhauer in German, Vico in Italian, Geulincx in Latin, and Bergson in French, mailed home from his German sojourn Kants Werke, compiled copious notes from such overviews as Wilhelm Windelband’s A History of Philosophy, wrote his longest poem about Descartes and his shortest story about an axiom of Heraclitus, examined Viennese Sprachskepsis for Joyce, was solicited by Sartre for contributions to Les Temps modernes, noted in his German travel diary his Leibnizian aim to bring “light in the monad,” urged in a letter the aesthetic value of nominalism, wrote a screenplay inspired by Berkeley, and in the opening of The Unnamable ironically echoed the Tractatus interdiction “whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent”:1 “I shall have to speak of things of which I cannot speak.”2 This anthology contains ac- counts of Beckett’s engagements with all but one of these philosophies. Gertrude Stein recalls Picasso saying that Joyce and Braque were “les incomprehensibles que tout le monde peut comprendre.”3 Beckett is so clear we hardly understand him at all. Scholars have long been concerned to identify Beckett’s philosophical kinships and gauge affinities, while philosophers like Adorno, Cavell, Deleuze, and Badiou have engaged with his work as with that of an intellectual peer. Some of these have succeeded only at the expense of obscuring the immediacy of the work. However, with the increased availability of archival documents, including the 266 folio pages (recto and verso) of the philosophy notebooks held at Trinity College Dublin, and the painstaking account in Dirk Van Hulle and Mark Nixon’s Samuel Beckett’s Library of his shelves of philosophy, Beckett criticism has been greatly enhanced, and sometimes chastened, by genetic scholarship, as this anthology, like the November 2011 special issue of Modernism/Modernity, attests. MODERNISM / modernity 600 Beckett/Philosophy has almost the character of a Festschrift to its co-editor, for Feldman, author of the indispensable Beckett’s Books, has been a prominent exponent of genetic criticism and “Historicizing Modernism,” as the series he co-edits for Continuum is titled. He is cited and quoted throughout the anthology, to which he contributes three essays, including a painstaking anatomy of the stages of Beckett’s immersion in nominalism. In an essay also derived from research into the philosophy notebooks, Peter Fifield ascribes Beckett’s preoccupation with “the justice of suffering and death” as much to study of “the op- positional metaphysics of early Greek philosophy” as to “Judeo-Christian and psychoanalytical rationales” (108). David Addyman casts convincing doubt on whether Beckett had read Bergson before writing the seemingly Bergsonian Proust, finding more credible sources in Protagoras and arguing that, after a brief period of absorption in the philosopher, Beckett deviated from Bergson by shifting emphasis from temporality to place. The dilemma facing those contributing chapters here on the early Greeks, Geulincx, Leib- niz, Kant, Berkeley, Johnson, Schopenhauer, and Mauthner is the extensive treatment these instigations have received, sometimes by these very scholars. Thus Erik Tonning cites his own publications thirteen times, making his essay seem more a synopsis of his scholarship than an addition to it. Having already given us exhaustive annotations to Murphy and Watt, Chris Ack- erley can but brilliantly reaffirm the inability of their eponymous protagonists to sustain monadic self-sufficiency. Tucker’s essay has by now largely been incorporated into his Samuel Beckett and Arnold Geulincx; he detects parallels between Beckett’s interest in Geulincx and in Kleist’s essay on marionette theatre, which Beckett read over thirty years after reading Geulincx. More tendentious claims appear in the anthology, as when Emilie Morin contends that, for Beckett, Dr. Johnson was an “anti-canonical philosopher” who anticipates language skepticism, “Heideggerian ontology and Sartrean phenomenology” (258). Charlotta Einarrson’s phenom- enological reading finds conceptual abstraction, ambiguity, and unreliability in Beckett’s pellucid “One Evening,” in which the only instability is the inherently provisional nature of narrative itself, about which the story is candid rather than ambivalent. The archive cannot, of course, secure consensus. Not surprisingly, several contributors come away from it assured of the preeminence of their area of research. Feldman documents how, from Watt on, Beckett is a nominalist (in Beckett and Phenomenology, Feldman called Watt the beginning of Beckett’s “phenomenological turn”), and while P. J. Murphy calls Kant the “decisive vision-changing influence” on the writer (205), for Tonning Schopenhauer is Beckett’s “fundamental” thinker (64). Each of these views is convincingly documented, and Beckett, as one who frequently drew upon his study of Gestalt theory, might see here not contradictions but illustrations of the psy- chology of “aspect change.” Perception may restlessly fluctuate where sense data and perceptual norms converge, as when the protagonist of Watt peers quizzically at the circular picture in Knott’s house. An archive is an optimal facility for such convergence rather than a refuge from it. Whereas P. J. Murphy, steeped in Beckett’s readings in Kant, perceives in Arsene’s revela- tion of “life off the ladder” in Watt a Kantian riposte to Joyce’s epiphany, a scholar steeped in Beckett’s readings in the psychology of perception would readily perceive here one of the novel’s exemplary applications of change of aspect. Must the archive arbitrate on this matter? This would be at the expense of the instructive vagueness Watt conjures. Cautioning against a dogmatic empirical methodology that cannot be value-free, Van Hulle, taking counsel from the object of his essay, concludes his excellent account of linguistic skepticism by urging scholars “to keep the methodological conversation open” (237). Yet one conversation regrettably never gets started, although Van Hulle acknowledges its pertinence. As Beckett’s Library confirms, that library contained numerous books by and concerning Wittgenstein, Mauthner’s most influential follower. Like most other studies devoted to Beckett’s philosophical interests, Beckett/Philosophy overlooks one of the very few modern philosophers in whom he is known to have taken an interest. book reviews Also consistent with scholarly norm is inattention to matters of philosophical style. Although 601 Katherine White contributes a fine essay titled “Beckett’s Form of Philosophy,” it is to suggest, like Badiou long since, that Beckett’s aesthetic of failure enacts a philosophy. What then of the actual forms philosophy takes? To give a form to the confusion was Beckett’s reiterated artistic credo, and he was hardly oblivious to its philosophical precedents. The Heraclitean fragment, Empedoclean verse, Socratic elenchus, Kantian disquisition, Berkeleyian colloquy (from whence derives the very title of his “Three Dialogues”), Johnsonian aphorism, Wittgensteinian discrete paragraph, and other philosophical forms may not detain the literary historian, but a cursory glance at his work demonstrates Beckett’s awareness of their possibilities. As Ackerley notes, it was not for his doctrines that Beckett read Leibniz. He declared in a 1933 letter, “Leibniz [is] a great cod, but full of splendid little pictures.”4 Even of his fervent study of Schopenhauer he could write in a 1930 letter, “I am not reading philosophy.”5 The literary archive can tell us what notes Beckett snatched as he read Ueberweg’s History of Philosophy, Geulincx’s Ethica, Mauthner’s Beiträge, and Wittgenstein’s Schriften, but it can- not of itself afford insight into how these acted upon his imagination and entered a repertoire of forms to be manipulated, burlesqued, adapted. Here scholars may have to show a bit of imagination themselves.
Recommended publications
  • Open Sroka Ginnelle Thegraniteceiling
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH “THE GRANITE CEILING”: DISCOURSES OF GENDER AND OPPRESSION IN THE POETRY OF PAULA MEEHAN GINNELLE SROKA Spring 2012 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in English with honors in English. Reviewed and approved* by the following: Jessica O’Hara Lecturer in English, Director of LA 101H Thesis Supervisor Jack Selzer Barry Director of the Paterno Fellows Program Professor of English Second Reader Lisa Sternlieb Professor of English Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College i ABSTRACT This thesis strives to provide contextual and critical analysis of a selection of Irish poet Paula Meehan’s poetry in light of her personal and canonical struggles with oppression and exclusion. The project is divided into two separate sections under which the poems are categorized: motherhood and influence, and the creation of poetry. The poems chosen in these sections offer insight into Meehan’s views on these subjects and how those views are directly linked to the oppressions surrounding the female voice in Irish poetic canon. This thesis argues that the resistance to outwardly repressive forces is an integral part of Meehan’s creative process and analyzes how this resistance has shaped her poetry. Examination of these influences and their link to her development as a poet also has significant implications for a minority in any poetic canon by revealing the effects of repression and exclusion. Though this project observes that oppression certainly affects poetry, it also proves that the poet has the ability to affect oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Enlightenment by Reading Samuel Beckett’S Waiting for Godot
    LITERARIA An International Journal of New Literature Across the World ISSN: 2229-4600 VOL. 5, No. 1-2, JAN-DEC 2015 In Search of Enlightenment by Reading Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot SYED ISMYL MAHMOOD RIZVI Patna University, Patna ABSTRACT Beckett’s philosophical indebtedness has long been recognised – especially in conjunction with Dante, Descartes and Geulincx. In this article, I examine Beckettian universal values of Enlightenment, which will be exposed as self-serving mystifications that rationalize and instrumentalize the meaning of life. In this context, the awareness of the Enlightenment nature of Beckett’s writing in Waiting for Godot will be analysed along with the freedom appeal of his reader as he strives to attain the enlightenment. ‘For enlightenment, all that is needed is freedom.’ (Kant 1991 [1784]) Suppose an individual in the world which is a hard shell that he attempts to toss it away, but for what; to think beyond it, and to relocate him beyond it in order to attain enlightenment. Whenever he looks above into the sky, the high sky, the clouds, the flying birds, the stars, the moon, the sun and the cosmos, those make him to forget the hard shell for a while until his eyes fell upon it and he is recaptured. Still into the pupil of his eyes he is reflecting the cosmos. This energy within him, within anyone has vitality and potentiality to reflect the cosmos, and to look beyond the hard shell. Let’s say that he has had an enlightenment experience. Enlightenment is a fact. It is the Truth itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Irish Women Poets and the National Tradition
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Senior Scholar Papers Student Research 1998 From Image to Image Maker: Contemporary Irish Women Poets and the National Tradition Rebecca Troeger Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/seniorscholars Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Troeger, Rebecca, "From Image to Image Maker: Contemporary Irish Women Poets and the National Tradition" (1998). Senior Scholar Papers. Paper 548. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/seniorscholars/548 This Senior Scholars Paper (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Scholar Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Rebecca Troeger From Image to Image Maker: Contemporary Irish Women Poets and the National Tradition • The Irish literary tradition has always been inextricably bound with the idea of image-making. Because of ueland's historical status as a colony, and of Irish people's status as dispossessed of their land, it has been a crucial necessity for Irish writers to establish a sense of unique national identity. Since the nationalist movement that lead to the formation of the Insh Free State in 1922 and the concurrent Celtic Literary Re\'ivaJ, in which writers like Yeats, O'Casey, and Synge shaped a nationalist consciousness based upon a mythology that was drawn only partially from actual historical documents, the image of Nation a.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Period Immediately After the Personal Catastrophe That Brought
    Louis Althusser and the End of Classical Russian Marxism: Spinoza, Hegel and the Critique of Dogmatic Marxism David Campbell Abstract: An attempt to restate Marx’s critical method in terms of Spinozist dogmatic epistemology was central to Louis Althusser’s conception of Marxist philosophy. Though it is no longer necessary to argue that this ‘restatement’ had almost no ground in Marx’s own thinking, it was a highly significant expression of the essence of dialectical materialism. Through discussion of Hegel’s critique of Spinoza, it will be argued that a democratically acceptable method of criticism of the mistaken beliefs of others, such as Marx developed in Capital, must take a resolutely anti-dogmatic approach which has the principle of winning subjective conviction at its core. Keywords: critical method; dogmatism; dialectical materialism; Spinoza; Hegel; Althusser Word count: 10,300 (14,385 including apparatuses) Contact details: School of Law, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YN; 01524 594123; [email protected] Biographical note: David Campbell is a Professor of Law at Lancaster University. His research interests are in the economic, legal and social theory of regulation, and in particular in the law of contract as the general regulation of exchange. Working in areas which have throughout his professional life been dominated by Chicagoan law and economics, he has sought to advance a socialist alternative to that approach. Louis Althusser and the End of Classical Russian Marxism: Spinoza, Hegel and the Critique of Dogmatic
    [Show full text]
  • Eavan Boland's Poetic Sequences
    Colby Quarterly Volume 35 Issue 4 December Article 5 December 1999 "A Deliberate Collection of Cross Purposes": Eavan Boland's Poetic Sequences Michael Thurston Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/cq Recommended Citation Colby Quarterly, Volume 35, no.4, December 1999, p.229-251 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Colby Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Colby. Thurston: "A Deliberate Collection of Cross Purposes": Eavan Boland's Poeti 1/A Deliberate Collection of Cross Purposes": Eavan Boland's Poetic Sequences by MICHAEL THURSTON EGINNING IN THE EARLY 1980s, Eavan Boland began to work not only in Bindividual lyrics but in slightly longer poems ("The Journey") and sequences of lyrics (including the poems gathered in In Her Own Image). Indeed, since the 1990 American appearance of Outside History: Selected Poems 1980-1990, each of Boland's books has included at least one such sequence (Outside History included two, the title sequence and also "Domestic Interior," which consisted of poems originally published as free­ standing lyrics, first gathered into a titled sequence in this American publica­ tion). While they share the central concerns that have structured Boland's career, each sequence focuses its meditation through a different thematic lens. "Domestic Interior" elaborates and problematizes its titular familial spaces as a haven from history; "Outside History" develops, questions, and finally rejects the possibility of finding and inhabiting any space "outside his­ tory" and explores the kinds of spaces available within the history the poet ultimately chooses; "Writing in a Time of Violence" takes up language itself and the role of representation in the construction of history and the subject's response to it; and "Colony," from Boland's most recent collection, The Lost Land, meditates on such public repositories of historic residues as cityscapes and monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • English Literature 2005
    School of English lecture series Hilary semester 2015 Engaging Poems Mar 17 ---- In this ten-week lecture series members of the School of English and invited guests will Mar 24 Stephen Matterson: Emily Dickinson, ‘There’s a certain slant of light’ introduce a poem and provide a close reading/analysis of it. The poems will be chosen Nicholas Grene: W. B. Yeats, ‘The Song of Wandering Aengus’ from a wide range of styles, periods and places, and will provide the audience with fresh insights into the poem as well as an understanding of how poetry analysis works: the Mar 31 Philip Coleman: Dennis O’Driscoll, ‘Dear Life’ lecture will be followed by audience discussion. Julie O'Callaghan, TBA Course Directors: Nicholas Grene, Stephen Matterson How to apply: Return the application form with the fee to: The Secretary (Evening Venue: Jonathan Swift Theatre, Arts Building TCD at 7 p.m. Lectures), Oscar Wilde Centre, 21 Westland Row, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2. Phone: 01-896 2885 email: [email protected] Jan 20 Introduction (Nicholas Grene and Stephen Matterson) Paula Meehan: W. B. Yeats, ‘The Cat and the Moon’ Fee: €50 for the entire series. Individual lectures are €6 each. Concessionary rates for the full series will be €35 or individual lecture €5 each. Cheques/Bank Drafts should be made Jan 27 David O’Shaughnessy: Percy Bysshe Shelley, ‘The Mask of Anarchy’ payable to TCD No. 1 Account. Darryl Jones: Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ‘Kubla Khan’ Application for Evening Lecture Series Feb 3 Amanda Piesse: Thomas Wyatt, ‘They flee from me that sometime
    [Show full text]
  • Lotze and the Early Cambridge Analytic Philosophy
    LOTZE AND THE EARLY CAMBRIDGE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY ―This summer I‘ve read about a half of Lotze‘s Metaphysik. He is the most delectable, certainly, of all German writers—a pure genius.‖ William James, September 8, 1879.1 Summary Many historians of analytic philosophy consider the early philosophy of Moore, Russell and Wittgenstein as much more neo-Hegelian as once believed. At the same time, the authors who closely investigate Green, Bradley and Bosanquet find out that these have little in common with Hegel. The thesis advanced in this chapter is that what the British (ill-named) neo-Hegelians brought to the early analytic philosophers were, above all, some ideas of Lotze, not of Hegel. This is true regarding: (i) Lotze’s logical approach to practically all philosoph- ical problems; (ii) his treating of the concepts relation, structure (constructions) and order; (iii) the discussion of the concepts of states of affairs, multiple theory of judgment, general logical form; (iv) some common themes like panpsychism and contemplating the world sub specie aeternitatis. 1. LOTZE, NOT HEGEL, LIES AT THE BOTTOM OF CAMBRIDGE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY Conventional wisdom has it that the early philosophy of Moore and Russell was under the strong sway of the British ―neo-Hegelians‖. In the same time, however, those historians who investigate the British ―neo-Hegelians‖ of 1880–1920 in detail, turn attention to the fact that the latter are not necessarily connected with Hegel: William Sweet made this point in regard to 1 Perry (1935), ii, p. 16. Bosanquet,2 Geoffrey Thomas in regard to Green,3 and Peter Nicholson in regard to Bradley.4 Finally, Nicholas Griffin has shown that Russell from 1895–8, then an alleged neo-Hegelian, ―was very strongly influenced by Kant and hardly at all by Hegel‖.5 These facts are hardly surprising, if we keep in mind that the representatives of the school of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism John E
    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Faculty Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Publications 4-1988 Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism John E. Jalbert Sacred Heart University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/rel_fac Part of the Philosophy of Mind Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Jalbert, John E. "Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism." Journal of the History of Philosophy 26.2 (1988): 279-296. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +XVVHUO V3RVLWLRQ%HWZHHQ'LOWKH\DQGWKH:LQGHOEDQG5LFNHUW 6FKRRORI1HR.DQWLDQLVP John E. Jalbert Journal of the History of Philosophy, Volume 26, Number 2, April 1988, pp. 279-296 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\7KH-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/hph.1988.0045 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/hph/summary/v026/26.2jalbert.html Access provided by Sacred Heart University (5 Dec 2014 12:35 GMT) Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband- Rickert School of Neo- Kanuamsm JOHN E. JALBERT THE CONTROVERSY AND DEBATE over the character of the relationship between the natural and human sciences (Natur- und Geisteswissenschaflen) became a central theme for philosophical reflection largely through the efforts of theo- rists such as Wilhelm Dilthey and the two principal representatives of the Baden School of Neo-Kantians, Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert.~ These turn of the century theorists are major figures in this philosophical arena, but they are by no means the only participants in the effort to grapple with this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Windelband and the Problem of Relativism
    Wilhelm Windelband and the problem of relativism Katherina Kinzel, University of Vienna [email protected] This is a preprint version. The final edit will appear in British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Abstract This paper analyses the shifts in Wilhelm Windelband’s ‘critical philosophy of values’ as it developed hand in hand with his understanding of relativism. The paper has two goals. On the one hand, by analysing the role that relativism played in his philosophical project, it seeks to contribute to a better understanding of Windelband's intellectual development in the context of historicism and Neo-Kantianism. On the other hand, by highlighting Windelband’s contribution to the understanding of relativism, it sheds light on an important episode in the history of that problem. The paper distinguishes between three phases in Windelband’s thinking and shows that his views about relativism changed in close connection with his conception of history. The early Windelband thought that historicism was compatible with absolute validity because he was firmly convinced of historical progress. The mature Windelband rejected progress as a means for justifying validity and put the problem of relativism into sharp relief. In response to the failure of his mature philosophy to fend off relativism, the later Windelband strengthened the role of history again. The paper concludes that Windelband’s significance lies not in his arguments against relativism, but rather in having furthered philosophical understanding of the problems at stake. Keywords Wilhelm Windelband; Relativism; Historicism; Psychologism; Neo-Kantianism 1. Introduction In late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Imperial Germany, relativism was a recurring topic of debate.
    [Show full text]
  • ENP11011 Eavan Boland and Modern Irish Poetry
    ENP11011 Eavan Boland and Modern Irish Poetry Module type Optional (approved module: MPhil in Irish Writing) Term / hours Hilary / 22 ECTS 10 Coordinator(s) Dr Rosie Lavan ([email protected]) Dr Tom Walker ([email protected]) Lecturer(s) Dr Rosie Lavan Dr Tom Walker Cap Depending on demand Module description Eavan Boland is one of the most significant Irish poets of the past century. In a career of more than 50 years, she persistently questioned, and radically expanded, the parameters of Irish poetry and the definition of the Irish poet. The course will examine a wide range of Eavan Boland’s poetry and prose. Seminars are structured around some of the poet’s major themes and modes. These will also be interspersed with seminars that seek to place Boland within the broader history of modern Irish poetry, via comparisons with the work and careers of Blanaid Salkeld, Patrick Kavanagh, Derek Mahon, Eiléan Ní Chuilleanáin and Paula Meehan. Also explored will be relevant historical and cultural contexts, and questions of poetics and ideology. Assessment The module is assessed through a 4,000-word essay. Indicative bibliography Students will need to purchase a copy of Eavan Boland, New Selected Poems (Carcanet/Norton) and Eavan Boland, Object Lessons: The Life of the Woman and the Poet in Our Time (Carcanet/Vintage/Norton) as the core course texts. Please note: it is expected that students will read Object Lessons in full before the start of the course. All other primary material needed through the term will be made available via Blackboard. This will include poems from Boland’s collections published since the appearance of New Collected Poems (Domestic Violence, A Woman Without A Country and The Historians) and the work of the other poets to be studied on the course, as well as various other relevant essays, articles and interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Given Note": Traditional Music and Modern Irish Poetry
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title "The Given Note": traditional music and modern Irish poetry Author(s) Crosson, Seán Publication Date 2008 Publication Crosson, Seán. (2008). "The Given Note": Traditional Music Information and Modern Irish Poetry, by Seán Crosson. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Publisher Cambridge Scholars Publishing Link to publisher's http://www.cambridgescholars.com/the-given-note-25 version Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6060 Downloaded 2021-09-26T13:34:31Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. "The Given Note" "The Given Note": Traditional Music and Modern Irish Poetry By Seán Crosson Cambridge Scholars Publishing "The Given Note": Traditional Music and Modern Irish Poetry, by Seán Crosson This book first published 2008 by Cambridge Scholars Publishing 15 Angerton Gardens, Newcastle, NE5 2JA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2008 by Seán Crosson All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-84718-569-X, ISBN (13): 9781847185693 Do m’Athair agus mo Mháthair TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Downloaded on 2020-06-06T01:34:25Z Ollscoil Na Héireann, Corcaigh
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title A cultural history of The Great Book of Ireland – Leabhar Mór na hÉireann Author(s) Lawlor, James Publication date 2020-02-01 Original citation Lawlor, J. 2020. A cultural history of The Great Book of Ireland – Leabhar Mór na hÉireann. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2020, James Lawlor. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/10128 from Downloaded on 2020-06-06T01:34:25Z Ollscoil na hÉireann, Corcaigh National University of Ireland, Cork A Cultural History of The Great Book of Ireland – Leabhar Mór na hÉireann Thesis presented by James Lawlor, BA, MA Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College Cork The School of English Head of School: Prof. Lee Jenkins Supervisors: Prof. Claire Connolly and Prof. Alex Davis. 2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4 Declaration .......................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 6 List of abbreviations used ................................................................................................... 7 A Note on The Great
    [Show full text]