Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy Versus Bilateral Neck Exploration for Primary Hyperparathyroidism Amanda M. Laird, MD*, Steven K. Libutti, MD KEYWORDS Primary hyperparathyroidism Parathyroidectomy Intraoperative parathyroid hormone Surgery Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy KEY POINTS The gold-standard surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism (10HPT) is cer- vical exploration and identification of all 4 parathyroid glands. Imaging techniques, including ultrasound, sestamibi scans, and 4D-CT scans, have made identification of single parathyroid adenomas possible. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring is a method to confirm biochemical cure before a patient leaves the operating room. There is some debate surrounding optimal surgical management of 10HPT because cure rates between minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and bilateral neck exploration (BNE) are equivalent. Advantages of MIP include reduced operative time, reduced recovery time, less postop- erative pain, and lower complication rate with respect to injury to parathyroid glands and recurrent laryngeal nerves. INTRODUCTION 10HPT is a common disease, with a prevalence as high as 3%.1 Many advances in the surgical management of 10HPT have been made since the first parathyroidectomy was performed by Felix Mandl in 1925.2 Traditional surgical management consists of identification of all 4 parathyroid glands through a transverse cervical incision.3 Bet- ter understanding of the disease, interest in the practice of endocrine neck surgery, The authors have nothing to disclose. Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Greene Medical Arts Pavilion, 3400 Bainbridge Avenue, 4th Floor, Bronx, NY 10467, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail address:
[email protected] Surg Oncol Clin N Am 25 (2016) 103–118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2015.08.012 surgonc.theclinics.com 1055-3207/16/$ – see front matter Ó 2016 Elsevier Inc.