Credit Determination of Fibre Channel in Avionics Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Credit Determination of Fibre Channel in Avionics Environment View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Chinese Journal of Aeronautics Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 20(2007) 247-252 www.elsevier.com/locate/cja Credit Determination of Fibre Channel in Avionics Environment LIN Qiang*, XIONG Hua-gang, ZHANG Qi-shan School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China Received 8 May 2006; accepted 16 November 2006 Abstract Fibre channel (FC) is the main candidate architecture for “unified network”. Flow control deals with the problem in which a de- vice receives frames faster than it can process them. Credit is an important service parameter for fibre channel flow control. Configuring the credit reasonably can avoid buffer overflow in nodes. This paper derives the mathematic relationships among credit, bandwidth and message sets under real-time condition according as three main topologies of fibre channel, and proposes the credit determination and the optimal credit for typical message sets. This study is based on the features of hard real-time communications in avionics environ- ment. Keywords: fibre channel; topology; login; credit; hard real-time condition 1 Introduction* ple topologies. Candidate COTS network standards for “unified network” must provide sufficient For more than two decades, MIL-STD-1553B bandwidth, low latency, a range of media and to- has served as the baseline standard for the integra- pologies, the need for guaranteed delivery, time dis- tion of the “federated” avionics architecture. Feder- tribution, and the need for broadcast and multicast ated systems use multiple buses in the avionics ar- services. chitecture and bring both technical and cost prob- One such candidate is fibre channel (FC). FC is lems. In the 1980’s, seven interconnection systems a new serial communication protocol approved by (HSDB, TM, PI, DN, SDDN, VDDN and 1553B) ANSI. It is widely used in the domains of network were proposed in “integrated” avionics architectures and high speed bus gradually with its good-com- to meet different and more challenging requirements patibility, high-speed and long-distance. FC defines of data communication. An avionics “unified net- three topologies, namely point-to-point, arbitrated work” takes the place of almost all the buses of loop, and fabric. networks in “integrated” architecture now to sim- The original FC protocol cannot be directly plify the design, eliminate the multiple networks, exploited for avionics real-time systems because its and improve the performance. The objectives of the extension ensures the delivery of messages rather unified network include the goal of a single protocol than guaranteeing a deterministic latency. Sugges- running over either the single topology or the multi- tions have been made by FC working group mem- bers on how to extend the FC to support the *Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-10-81414980. real-time applications in avionics environment E-mail address: [email protected] Foundation item: National Natural Science Foundation of China (FC-AE), but the problem of providing real-time (10477005) · 248 · LIN Qiang et al. / Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 20(2007) 247-252 capability in FC network for general purpose is not sages do not have any real-time requirement. In solved satisfyingly and remains to be answered. avionics systems, the primary aim of the real-time Flow control is the FC-2 level control process communication system is to guarantee timely the to pace the flow of frames between Nx_Ports, an delivery of synchronous messages. Nx_Port and the fabric and within the fabric to pre- It is assumed that there are n streams of real- vent overrun at the receiver. FC flow control is time messages marked S1, S2, ···, Sn in the network based on the concept of credit. Credit is an impor- which form a message set M, i.e. tant service parameter in FC, which is defined as the M = {S1, S2, ···, Sn} (1) number of receive buffers allocated to transmitting The message streams S are described as fol- FC_Port. There are two types of credits used in flow i lows: control: one is end-to-end credit(EE_Credit) be- ① Message inter-arrival time P : the message tween communicating Nx_Ports, the other is buffer- i S generating period, for non periodic message, it to-buffer credit(BB_Credit) between adjacent FC_ i represents the minimum inter-arrival time of the Ports. Configuring the credit reasonably can avoid message. buffer overflow in receive buffers of each node and ② Message length C : the amount of time to improve the reliability of the network. The number i transmit the message S . of receive buffers is closely relative to the message i ③ Message deadline D : the maximum al- transmission bandwidth allocation. The standard of i lowed message delay for S , from its arrival at the FC framing and signaling only provides the default i source to be transmitted to the destination. login value of credit[1]. ④ Minimum message deadline Dmin: the mi- 2 Hard Real-time Model of FC nimum of message deadline Di. The requirement of system designment is Avionics is one of the typical hard real-time systems which are required to complete their works Dmin≤Di≤Pi [2] and deliver their services on a timely basis. The pe- Each message stream Si can be represented as riodic task model is a well-known deterministic Si = (Ci , Pi , Di) (2) workload. With its various extensions, the model characterizes accurately many traditional hard real- Let Xi(t) denote the minimum amount of trans- time applications. We adopt a simple operational mission time available for the message stream on definition: the job is a hard real-time job, the user node i during any time interval of length t. Any requires the validation that the system always meets message in the message set M should have enough the timing constraints. amount of transmission time before its deadline, that is, for message stream Si: 2.1 Message model Xi(Di)≥Ci (i = 1, 2, ···, n) (3) One of the results of avionics system design is the forming of message streams among sub-systems 2.2 Network model or modules. The messages are regulated by interface The point-to-point topology consists of two control document (ICD) specification and can be and only two FC devices connected directly together. divided into two classes: synchronous and asyn- The transmit fibre of one device goes to the receive chronous. The example of synchronous message in fibre of the other device, and vice versa. There is no avionics may be messages from radar or other sen- sharing of the media, which allows the devices to sors, control and status message etc. Synchronous enjoy the total bandwidth of the link. Every node in messages are periodically generated and subjected arbitrated loop is connected to the network via to real-time constraints while asynchronous mes- L_Port which is assigned unique local loop physical LIN Qiang et al. / Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 20(2007) 247-252 · 249 · address during initialization. When a node attempts 3 Bandwidth Allocation for Shared Media to access the network, it must win an arbitration. Environment The arbitration relies on priority of each node. To The FC-AL protocol describes the algorithm on prevent that the lower priority L_Ports cannot gain how to solve the problem of MAC in the shared access to the loop, the fibre channel arbitrated loop media environment. Every node in FC-AL is con- (FC-AL) standard proposes access fairness algo- nected to the network via L_Port which is assigned rithm which sets up an access window in which all unique local loop physical address during initializa- L_Ports are given an opportunity to arbitrate and tion. FC-AL standard proposes access fairness algo- win access to the loop. Switched fabric is used to rithm which sets up an access window in which all connect many (224) devices in a cross-point L_Ports are given an opportunity to arbitrate and switched configuration[3]. The benefit of this topol- win access to the loop. When all L_Ports have an ogy is that many devices can communicate at the opportunity to access the loop once, a new window same time[2]. is started. An L_Port may arbitrate again and even- Flow control is managed using end-to-end tually win access to the loop in the new access credit, end-to-end credit_CNT, ACK_1, buffer- window. If a port has won an arbitration and ac- to-buffer credit, buffer-to-buffer credit_CNT, and cessed the network, it cannot arbitrate for loop ac- R_RDY along with other frames. The buffer to cess again until all other ports have had an opportu- buffer flow control model for FC is shown as nity to access the loop. Only when the network be- Fig.1[1]. The ideas used for BB _Credit in this paper comes idle can the next access window start[4]. are also suitable for the EE_Credit determination. Let Dmin denote the upper-bound of the access During login, a new node exchanges service fairness window, that is, it will not be exceeded with parameters including credit with node to which it total message transmission time and system over- intends to communicate. Node service parameters heads. Let θ denotes the overhead time, one has are then saved and used whenever the node initiates n ≤ a communication. ∑ fi Dmin −θ (4) i=1 According to the characteristics of avionics, it During any time interval of length t, the mini- is assumed that both the transmitting and receiving mum amount of time available for node i in FC-AL network layers are always ready, the rate at which can be represented as data are transmitted is fixed and the processing time ⎧00<≤ t Dmin accords for hard real-time requirement, and the ⎪ ⎪(1)mftmii−+− iDmin communication channel is error free.
Recommended publications
  • Storage Area Networks Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003
    Server Clusters : Storage Area Networks Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 Microsoft Corporation Published: March 2003 Abstract This document describes what storage area networks (SAN) are, how server clusters can be deployed in a SAN, and how the Microsoft® Windows® platform, and Windows clustering in particular, take advantage of storage area network technology. Microsoft® Windows® Server 2003 Technical Article The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. © 2003. Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, SQL Server, and the Windows logo are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy Technologies
    Legacy Technologies Reference Manual P/N 300-011-727 REV A02 EMC Corporation Corporate Headquarters: Hopkinton, MA 01748-9103 1-508-435-1000 www.EMC.com Copyright © 2001 – 2011 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Published April, 2011 EMC believes the information in this publication is accurate as of its publication date. The information is subject to change without notice. THE INFORMATION IN THIS PUBLICATION IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” EMC CORPORATION MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PUBLICATION, AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Use, copying, and distribution of any EMC software described in this publication requires an applicable software license. For the most up-to-date regulatory document for your product line, go to the Technical Documentation and Advisories section on EMC Powerlink. For the most up-to-date listing of EMC product names, see EMC Corporation Trademarks on EMC.com. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 2 Legacy Technologies Reference Manaul Contents Preface.............................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 1 Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL) FC-AL ................................................................................................. 16 Overview..................................................................................... 16 Loop construction.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fibre Channel — Switch Fabric - 6 (FC-SW-6) 1 Scope
    draft proposed INCITS Standard INCITS xxx-xxxx draft proposed American National Standard for Information Technology— Fibre Channel — Switch Fabric - 6 (FC-SW-6) 1 Scope This American National Standard for FC-SW-6 describes the operation and interaction of Fibre Chan- nel Switches. This standard includes: a) E_Port Operation and Fabric Configuration; b) Path selection (FSPF); c) Bridge Port (B_Port) Operation; d) Distributed server interaction and communication; e) Exchange of information between Switches to support zoning; f) Distribution of Event Notifications between Switches; g) Virtual Fabrics Switch Support; h) Enhanced Commit Service; i) Virtual Channels; j) Distributed Switch Mmodel 2 Normative references 2.1 Overview The following standards contain provisions that, through reference in the text, constitute provisions of this standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this standard are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards listed below. For electronic copies of ANSI and INCITS standards, visit ANSI's Electronic Standards Store (ESS) at http://www.ansi.org. For printed versions of most standards listed here, contact Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO; 80112-5704, (800) 854-7179. 1 INCITS xxx-xxxx Switch Fabric - 6 Rev 1.1 August 10, 2012 Orders for ISO Standards and ISO publications should normally be addressed to the ISO member in your country. If that is impractical, ISO Standards and ISO publications may be ordered from ISO Central Secretariat (ISO/CS): Phone +41 22 749 01 11 Fax +41 22 749 09 47 E-mail [email protected] Post ISO, 1, rue de Varembé, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland In order to avoid delivery errors, it is important that you accurately quote the standard's reference number given in the ISO catalogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Fibre Channel Functional Overview
    Fibre Channel Functional Overview Prior chapters have so far been dedicated to the fundamentals of the SCSI protocol and have placed much emphasis on the layered approach to distributed communications illustrated in Figure 1-1 (p. 1). Figure 1-1: Layered SCSI Communication Model. p. 1 While the SCSI Application Layer (SAL) and the SCSI Transport Protocol Layer (STPL) are inherently part of the SCSI specification, the Interconnect Layer can be implemented by a variety of interconnect methods such as the SCSI Parallel Interface (SPI), Fibre Channel, InfiniBand or TCP/IP, to name the most prevalent. When Fibre Channel is used as an interconnect method for SCSI, the relationship between both protocol stacks is shown in Figure 1-2 (p. 2). Figure 1-2: Relationship Between SCSI and FC Stacks. Figure 3-2 reveals that Fibre Channel boasts a layered structure of its own in which various protocol functions are segregated into discrete levels. This layering is central to the Fibre Channel architecture and forms the basis for this chapter. The previous chapter also introduces protocol mapping by describing how SCSI PDUs are grouped into IUs fit for transmission by using Fibre Channel sequence and exchange logical constructs. These constructs, along with the fundamental structure and capabilities of the Fibre Channel communications protocol, are presented in this chapter while highlighting key points which make Fibre Channel a choice interconnect for SCSI applications. Accordingly, this chapter also brings to a conclusion the protocol mapping introduction offered in Error! Reference source not found.: Error! Reference source not found. (p. Error! Bookmark not defined.).
    [Show full text]
  • EMC Clariion CX300 2-Gigabit Disk Processor Enclosure (DPE2)
    EMC CLARiiON CX300 2-Gigabit Disk Processor Enclosure (DPE2) HARDWARE REFERENCE P/N 300-001-075 REV A01 EMC Corporation Corporate Headquarters: Hopkinton, MA 01748 -9103 1-508 -435 -1000 www.EMC.com Copyright ©2004 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Published February, 2004 EMC believes the information in this publication is accurate as of its publication date. However, the information is subject to change without notice. THE INFORMATION IN THIS PUBLICATION IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” EMC CORPORATION MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PUBLICATION, AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Use, copying, and distribution of any EMC software described in this publication require an applicable software license. Trademark Information EMC2, EMC, CLARiiON, Navisphere, and PowerPath are registered trademarks and Access Logix, EMC ControlCenter, FLARE, MirrorView, SAN Copy, and SnapView are trademarks of EMC Corporation. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. ii CX300 Hardware Reference Regulatory Notices Product Type(s): X1E+ This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Testing was done with shielded cables. Therefore, in order to comply with the FCC regulations, you must use shielded cables with your installation. Changes or modifications to this unit not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user's authority to operate the equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Point-To-Point Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop
    CMR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Assessment Test 1 – Sept. 2016 Scheme and solution Sub: STORAGE AREA NETWORKS Code: 10IS765 Date: 8/ 09 / 2016 Duration: 90 mins Max Marks: 50 Sem: VII A & B Branch: ISE/CSE Note: Answer any five questions. 1 Explain FC connectivity with related diagrams (6m) The FC architecture supports three basic interconnectivity options: point-topoint, arbitrated loop (FC-AL), and fabric connect. Point-to-Point Point-to-point is the simplest FC configuration — two devices are connected directly to each other, as shown in Figure 6-6. This configuration provides a dedicated connection for data transmission between nodes. However, the point-to-point configuration offers limited connectivity, as only two devices can communicate with each other at a given time. Moreover, it cannot be scaled to accommodate a large number of network devices. Standard DAS usess pointto-point connectivity. Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop In the FC-AL configuration, devices are attached to a shared loop, as shown in Figure 6-7. FC-AL has the characteristics of a token ring topology and a physical star topology. In FC-AL, each device contends with other devices to perform I/O operations. Devices on the loop must “arbitrate” to gain control of the loop. At any given time, only one device can perform I/O operations on the loop.As a loop configuration, FC-AL can be implemented without any interconnectingdevices by directly connecting one device to another in a ring through cables However, FC-AL implementations may also use hubs whereby the arbitrated loop is physically connected in a star topology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Storage Area Network and Fibre Channel Protocol Primer 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1 2 SATISFYING THE MARKET’S INSATIABLE DEMAND FOR STORAGE ....................................1 3 STORAGE AREA NETWORK (SAN) OVERVIEW.........................................................................2 3.1 SCSI AND SAN DEVICE ADDRESSING, LUNS AND PRIORITIZATION EXPLAINED..................................... 3 4 DISTINGUISHING FIBRE CHANNEL FROM THE FIBRE CHANNEL PROTOCOL.....................3 5 FIBRE CHANNEL CONNECTION METHODS, A MORE DETAILED LOOK ................................3 5.1 POINT-TO-POINT ................................................................................................................................4 5.2 ARBITRATED LOOP ............................................................................................................................. 4 5.3 SWITCHED FABRIC.............................................................................................................................. 5 6 HOW FIBRE CHANNEL DEVICES TALK TO ONE ANOTHER.....................................................6 6.1 PORT DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................. 6 6.2 NAMING OF DEVICES AND HOW THEY ARE ADDRESSED ........................................................................ 6 6.3 ESTABLISHING A CONNECTION BETWEEN PORTS.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Storage Area Networks
    Chapter 6 Storage Area Networks rganizations are experiencing an explo- KEY CONCEPTS sive growth in information. This infor- Omation needs to be stored, protected, Storage Consolidation optimized, and managed efficiently. Data center Fibre Channel (FC) Architecture managers are burdened with the challenging task of providing low-cost, high-performance Fibre Channel Protocol Stack information management solutions. An effective Fibre Channel Ports information management solution must provide the following: Fibre Channel Addressing World Wide Names ฀■ Just-in-time information to business users: Information must be available to business Zoning users when they need it. The explosive growth in online storage, proliferation of Fibre Channel Topologies new servers and applications, spread of mission-critical data throughout enterprises, and demand for 24 × 7 data availability are some of the challenges that need to be addressed. ฀■ Integration of information infrastructure with business processes: The storage infrastructure should be integrated with various business pro- cesses without compromising its security and integrity. ฀■ Flexible and resilient storage architecture: The storage infrastructure must provide flexibility and resilience that aligns with changing business requirements. Storage should scale without compromising performance requirements of the applications and, at the same time, the total cost of managing information must be low. 117 118 Section II ■ Storage Networking Technologies and Virtualization Direct-attached storage (DAS) is often referred to as a stovepiped storage environment. Hosts “own” the storage and it is difficult to manage and share resources on these isolated storage devices. Efforts to organize this dispersed data led to the emergence of the storage area network (SAN). SAN is a high- speed, dedicated network of servers and shared storage devices.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2015 SNIA Dictionary Was Underwritten by the Generous Contributions Of
    The 2015 SNIA Dictionary was underwritten by the generous contributions of: If your organization is a SNIA member and is interested in sponsoring the 2016 edition of this dictionary, please contact [email protected]. 4360 ArrowsWest Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719.694.1380 www.snia.org SNIA acknowledges and thanks its Voting Member Companies: Cisco Computerworld Cryptsoft Cygate DDN Dell EMC Emulex Evaluator Group Flexstar Fujitsu Hitachi HP Huawei IBM Intel Macrosan Microsoft NetApp NTP Software Oracle Pure Storage QLogic Samsung Toshiba XIO Voting members as of 3.23.15 Storage Networking Industry Association Your Connection Is Here Welcome to the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA). Our mission is to lead the storage industry worldwide in developing and promoting standards, technologies, and educational services to empower organizations in the management of information. Made up of member companies spanning the global storage market, the SNIA connects the IT industry with end-to-end storage and information management solutions. From vendors, to channel partners, to end users, SNIA members are dedicated to providing the industry with a high level of knowledge exchange and thought leadership. An important part of our work is to deliver vendor-neutral and technology-agnostic information to the storage and data management industry to drive the advancement of IT technologies, standards, and education programs for all IT professionals. For more information visit: www.snia.org The Storage Networking Industry Association 4360 ArrowsWest Drive Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, U.S.A. +1 719-694-1380 The 2015 SNIA Dictionary A glossary of storage networking, data, and information management terminology by the Storage Networking Industry Association The SNIA Dictionary contains terms and definitions related to storage and other information technologies, and is the storage networking industry's most comprehensive attempt to date to arrive at a common body of terminology for the technologies it represents.
    [Show full text]
  • Fibre Channel Over Ethernet Fibre Channel Over Ethernet
    The Fibre Channel Consultant Series FibreFibre ChannelChannel overover EthernetEthernet Robert W. Kembel Copyright © 2008 by Robert W. Kembel All rights reserved. Except for brief passages to be published in a review or as citation of au- thority, no part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission from the publisher. If trademarks or tradenames of any companies or products have been used within this book, no such uses are intended to convey endorsement or other affiliations with the book. Any brand names or products used within this book are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Though the author and publisher have made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and com- pleteness of the information contained in this book, they assume no responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or any inconsistency therein. The reader is strongly advised to refer to the appropriate standards documents before beginning any design activities. Disclaimer: This is a pre-publication edition of the book and has not been spell-checked, proofread or checked for accuracy or completeness and may be incomplete, incorrect, or just downright wrong. At the time of writing, the FCoE standard had not been approved by INCITS Technical Committee T11 and information contained in this publication should be considered prelimi- nary. ISBN 978-0-931836-75-6 Published by: Northwest Learning Associates, Inc. 3061 N. Willow Creek Drive Tucson, AZ 85712 520-881-0877, Fax: 520-881-0632 email: [email protected] Visit our web site at www.NLAbooks.com Printed in the United States of America First edition: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ii Contents List of Figures .
    [Show full text]
  • Storage Area Network
    Section 2 : Storage Networking Technologies and Virtualization Storage Area Network Chapter 6 EMC Proven Professional The #1 Certification Program in the information storage and management industry © 2009 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Chapter Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to: .Describe SAN and its benefits .Discuss components of SAN .Describe connectivity options of SAN .Describe FC protocol stack and FC addressing .List common FC topologies © 2009 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Business Needs and Technology Challenges .Just-in-time information to business users .Integration of information infrastructure with business processes .Flexible and resilient storage architecture .DAS is inefficient to meet these challenges . Storage Networking emerged as a solution . FC SAN . NAS . IP SAN © 2009 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 6.1 Overview of Fibre Channel . Fibre Channel is a high-speed network technology uses: . Optical fiber cables (for front end connectivity) . Serial copper cables (for back end connectivity) . Latest FC implementations support 8GFC - 8Gb/s . Servers are attached to 2 distinct networks . Back-end . Front-end IP FC SAN network Users and Servers and Storage and Application Applications Application Clients Data © 2009 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Fibre Channel contd… . FC standardization began in 1988 by ANSI. They chartered Fibre Channel Working Group (FCWG). In 1994, high speed standard was developed and Fibre Channel Association (FCA) was founded with 70 members of companies. Offers High speed compared to Ultra SCSI. © 2009 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 6.2 SAN and Its Evolution . Dedicated high speed network of Servers servers and shared storage devices across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Storage Area Networking
    Storage Area Networking ABTS Abort Basic Link Service. ACC Accept link service reply; a the normal reply to an Extended Link Service request (such as FLOGI) and indicates that the request has been completed. ACK Acknowledgement frame; used for end-to end- flow control, that verifies receipt of a 1+ frames from Class 1 or Class 2 services. Access fairness A process by which contending nodes are guaranteed access to an Arbitrated Loop. Access method The method used to access a physical medium in order to transmit data. Active copper A fibre channel connection that allows up to 33m-length copper cabling between devices. Address identifier A 24-bit number used to indicate the link-level address of communi- cating devices. In a frame header, the address identifier indicates the source ID and the destination ID of the frame (S_ID and D_ID) respectively. AL_PA Arbitrated Loop Physical Address; an 8-bit value used to identify a device partici- pating in an arbitrated loop. AL_TIME Arbitrated Loop Timeout value; twice the amount of time it would take for a transmission word to propagate around a worst-case loop. The default value is 15ms. Alias server A proposed standard as part of FC-PH-3, will use the well-known address FFFFF8 and will maintain identifier mappings to support multicast group management. ANSI American National Standards Institute; the governing body for standards in the U.S. Arbitrated Loop A shared 100MBps fibre channel transport supporting up to a maximum of 126 devices and 1 attachment to a fabric. Ports with lower AL_PAs have higher priorities.
    [Show full text]