DOCSLIB.ORG

Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan and Proposed Critical Habitat St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan and Proposed Critical Habitat St U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan and proposed Critical Habitat St. Mary/Belly River Recovery Unit (CHAPTER 25) What areas are included in the St. Mary and Belly Rivers Recovery Unit? The Saint Mary and Belly Rivers are tributaries of the South Saskatchewan River drainage in Canada, which eventually enters Hudson Bay. The Saint Mary and Belly Rivers flow northward from U.S. headwaters that include the northeastern portion of Glacier contain migratory populations of State, and Provincial National Park and the north- bull trout that have become governments in the U.S. and western portion of the Blackfeet isolated, with restricted upstream Canada, working with Tribal Indian Nation, in northwest spawning and rearing habitat. representatives from the Montana. The Saint Mary and Blackfeet Nation. Belly Rivers Recovery Unit is How much of the area is unique, as the only bull trout proposed as critical habitat? Who would be affected by recovery unit east of the conti- At this time, only the Recovery recovery efforts? nental divide. It is a small Plan for the Saint Mary and Belly A recovery plan is advisory recovery unit, encompassing only Rivers Recovery Unit is being only and carries no regulatory about 600 square miles in the U.S. released for public comment. The authority. It is the Fish and critical habitat designation is under Wildlife Service’s estimation of The recovery unit includes two development and is scheduled to the actions necessary for the separate primary core areas found be proposed in the fall of 2003. recovery of the species. in the interconnected portions of Agencies, communities or the Saint Mary River and Belly Who developed the draft individuals are encouraged to River watersheds, respectively. recovery plan? take voluntary actions Four secondary core area popul- The draft recovery plan for bull described in the recovery plan ations are located in the Saint trout in the Saint Mary and Belly to benefit bull trout. Mary River drainage in isolated Rivers Recovery Unit was headwaters of Red Eagle Lake, developed through the Federal agencies are required to Slide Lake, Cracker Lake, and Lee collaboration of biologists consult with the Fish and Creek. Secondary core areas are representing various Federal, Wildlife Service on actions they based in smaller watersheds and carry out, fund, or authorize within the range of bull trout. Non-Federal entities, including private landowners, 1 that may also be affected could Belly Rivers Recovery Unit is in include, for example, those U.S. waters, but substantial seeking a U.S. Army Corps of portions of the foraging, Engineers 404 permit under the migrating, and overwintering Clean Water Act to build an in- habitat is located downstream in water structure, those seeking the Canadian province of Alberta. Federal approval to discharge main-stem migratory corridors, effluent into the aquatic What is the status of bull trout are the primary factors environment, or those seeking in the St. Mary and Belly Rivers negatively impacting bull trout Federal funding to implement Recovery Unit? in both the Saint Mary and private property improvements, The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Belly Rivers. Secondary effects where such actions affect the issued a final rule, listing bull trout from the diversions are the aquatic environment. In most (Salvelinus confluentus) in the direct loss of bull trout due to cases where this link between United States across their entire entrainment in the canals, as activities on private lands and range as a threatened species on well as altera-tions to stream Federal funding, permitting, or November 1, 1999 (64 FR 58910). flow and water temperatures in authorization exists, consultation Bull trout remain widely downstream reaches. Much of under section 7 of the Endangered distributed throughout the Saint the spawning and rearing Species Act is already occurring. Mary and Belly River basins. habitat for bull trout in this They are found in most portions of recovery unit is in relatively How was the draft recovery U.S. drainage where they remote locations in Glacier plan for each unit developed? historically occurred, but were National Park or on the Recovery units were delineated naturally excluded by waterfalls Blackfeet Indian Reservation based on the biology of the species from many headwaters basins and where human impacts and and considerations for paralleling lakes. The extent of bull trout development have been limited. existing state conservation and range in downstream portions of Localized impacts to habitat fisheries management frameworks the basin in much of Alberta has occur in some the lower wherever possible. Recovery been diminished. Abundance of elevation watersheds due to teams incorporated existing state bull trout in the Saint Mary and forestry, livestock grazing, conservation processes to the Belly Rivers Recovery Unit is agriculture, mining, and degree possible, depending on the believed to be reduced from transportation corridors. But degree to which they had been historical levels, though limited these impacts are generally site- developed (for example, the documentation exists. Most local specific and less pervasive than Montana Bull Trout Restoration populations lack a sufficient the effects of irrigation Plan). history or intensity of monitoring diversions. A half-century of to accurately determine a current fish introductions, particularly Because the Saint Mary and Belly population trend. the widespread stocking and Rivers Recovery Unit contains establishment of brook trout, only Federal, Tribal, and private What are the threats to bull has negatively impacted bull lands, the involvement of the State trout in the St. Mary and Belly trout in portions of several of Montana was not extensive in Rivers Recovery Unit? the development of this recovery Construction of major irrigation unit chapter. Due to the projects in the U.S. and Canada, international configuration of this dating as far back as 1902, drainage, close cooperation with disrupted much of the historical Canadian authorities is crucial to connectivity for migratory bull bull trout recovery. Most of the trout within the Saint Mary and spawning and rearing habitat for Belly Rivers. Diversion dams, bull trout in the Saint Mary and which seasonally interrupt the 2 drainages. Illegal harvest of bull identified in the Saint Mary and the overall bull trout population trout has been well documented in Belly Rivers Recovery Unit. in the Saint Mary and Belly the Saint Mary and Belly Rivers Rivers Recovery Unit is Recovery Unit, and in the past has What are the criteria for accepted, under contemporary been a major mortality factor due measuring recovery? standards of the time, as stable to a traditional focus on well Recovery will be measured or increasing; based on at least known and limited spawning according to four criteria: 10 years of monitoring data. areas. Angler misidentification of distribution, abundance, Connectivity criteria will be species resulting in illegal harvest, population trends and connectivity met when Shelburne Dam and and incidental take by anglers due in the watershed. The recovery Saint Mary Diversion to hooking mortality are plan includes specific, quantifiable operational and maintenance continuing concerns. standards for each of these issues, including flow, fish criteria. passage, and entrainment What are the recovery goals and Distribution criteria will be met concerns, are satisfactorily objectives? when the total number of stable addressed. The goal for recovery of bull trout local populations of bull trout in in this Saint Mary and Belly Rivers United States waters of the Saint What actions will be Recovery Unit is to ensure the Mary and Belly Rivers Recovery necessary to recover bull long-term persistence of self- Unit is nine or more, and local trout in the St. Mary and sustaining, complex, interacting populations remain broadly Belly Rivers Recovery Unit? groups of bull trout distributed distributed in each core area. The primary recovery strategy throughout the Saint Mary and Abundance criteria will be met in this recovery unit involves Belly Rivers Recovery Unit such when each of the six core areas in alleviating detrimental effects of that the species can be delisted. To the Saint Mary and Belly Rivers the extensive diversion and achieve this goal a net increase in Recovery Unit is documented to canal systems operated on the bull trout abundance in the Saint support at least one local Saint Mary and Belly Rivers in Mary and Belly Rivers Recovery population with an average of 100 the U.S. and Canada. Unit (as measured by standards or more adult bull trout annually Localized impacts to habitat the recovery team develops), with (in United States tributaries). In due to forestry, livestock restored distribution of any the interconnected Saint Mary grazing, agriculture, mining, populations identified by the River core area the local and transportation corridors recovery unit team as necessary populations must support an must also be addressed and for recovery. At this time, no annual average of 500 or more some fishery management extirpated populations have been adult bull trout. concerns must be dealt with. Trend criteria will be met when Over most of the last decade significant planning efforts to restore and recover bull trout have been initiated in Montana and Alberta Canada, and some on-the-ground activities have been implemented that were specifically designed to benefit bull trout and other native salmonids within the Saint Mary and Belly Rivers Recovery Unit. Ultimately, the measure by which these efforts 3 should be judged is the degree to www.species.fws.gov/bulltrout. KwaTaqNuk Resort; 303 U.S. which they have produced positive Hwy 93. response in the numbers and How can I comment? security of local bull trout The Service will be accepting January 9, 2003 in Spokane, populations. More details are comments, beginning November WA; West Coast Grand Hotel; available in the full text of the St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter Upper Cretaceous Reservoirs
    CHAPTER 9 UPPER CRETACEOUS RESERVOIRS P. Viney, Petrel Robertson; Part B: Belly River Fm; and J.F. Chappell, L.L. & E. Canada; Part A: Cardium Fm INTRODUCTION The Bearpaw Fm, over 150 m thick in southcentral Alberta it would appear that exploration dollars directed towards them could Walker (1987, 1988), Swagor (1975) and Swagor et al. (1976). (14-18-2-23W4M), thins to the north and grades into the non-marine yield a good rate of return. Interest in exploration for these Cardium Fm conglomerate reser­ The evolution of the Alberta Basin during Upper Cretaceous time sequence of the overlying Horseshoe Canyon Fm (Edmonton Gp). voirs was reactivated in the early 1980's due to the discovery of and its effect on the geologic section is covered in the introduction to The four major Upper Cretaceous reservoirs are: 1) The Cardium; several new Cardium Fm pools and the recognition that modern this text. Strata of the Upper Cretaceous underlie most of the area Production has been obtained from the Upper Cretaceous section 2) The lower Belly River; 3) The Dunvegan-Doe Creek; and 4) The seismic reflection technology could be used in their detection covered by the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin in an almost con­ for many years. However, prospecting for Upper Cretaceous hydro­ Belly River fluvial. (Chappell, 1984, 1985; Wren, 1984). The Carrot Creek Cardium S tinuous sequence of deposition. From the Base of Fish Scales Zone, carbons did not begin in earnest until the discovery of Cardium pool, located in 53-12 and 13 W5M (Fig. 9.4), is a typical example.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and OIL and GAS PROSPECTS of the HUNTLEY FIELD, Montanj
    GEOLOGY AND OIL AND GAS PROSPECTS OF THE HUNTLEY FIELD, MONTANj By E. T. HANCOCK. INTRODUCTION. The Huntley field is in Yellowstone and Big Horn counties, south- central Montana, and embraces an area of about 650 square miles, part of which lies northwest and part southeast of Yellowstone River. The field has railroad facilities that are exceptionally good for this general region, being traversed by the main lines of the Northern Pacific and the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy railroads. These roads furnish excellent shipping facilities at Huntley, Warden, Ballantine, Pompeys Pillar, and other points. Acknowledgments. In presenting this report the writer desires to express his thanks to David White for valuable suggestions and criticisms, to T. W. Stanton and F. H. Knowlton for the identifica­ tion of fossils, and to C. E. Dobbins for assistance in the detailed mapping. He also wishes to call attention to the public service rendered by oil and gas operators who have furnished records of deep borings and by individuals who have contributed in various ways to the success of the investigation. Earlier investigations. The Huntley field is in reality an ex­ tension of the Lake Basin field, which was mapped by the writer during the summer of 1916.1 The geologic investigation of the region including the Lake Basin and Huntley fields began with the Northern Transcontinental Survey of 1882. Prior to that time geologists had described certain struc­ tural features and the stratigraphic succession at points closely ad­ jacent to these fields, such as Judith Gap, the canyon of the North Fork of the- Musselshell, and the Bridger Range, but almost noth­ ing had been written concerning the geology of the area herein de­ scribed.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Land Use in Glacier National Park
    PALEOINDIAN LAND USE IN GLACIER NATIONAL PARK John J. Kinsner, M.A. Final Report 2010 Author’s Acknowledgements This project was made possible by funding provided from the National Park Service’s Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (RM-CESU). The author would like to extend special thanks to Christine Whitacre and Pei-Lin Yu of the RM-CESU, Lon Johnson and Deirdre Shaw of Glacier National Park, and Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald of the University of Montana. John J. Kinsner OUTLINE 1. Title Page w/ photo 4 (Mount Carter) 2. Acknowledgements 2. Report Outline 3. Introduction 3. Cultural Chronology 3. Table 1 5. Paleoindian Evidence in Glacier Park 6. Original Interpretations w/ photo 1 (Alberta projectile point) 7. Other Evidence 9. Seasonality 9. Physical Evidence 11. Depositional Environment 12. Three Hypotheses 15. Discussion 16. Conclusion 18. Figure 1 19. Photos 2 – 3 20. Photos 4 - 5 21. Bibliography 2 It has generally been understood that Glacier National Park (GNP) has a 10,000 year culture history as implied by the archeological record of GNP, park brochures, numerous publications (Reeves 2003), and governmental, corporate, and private web sites (nps.gov, Wikipedia.com, fcvb.org). However, this presumption is based upon a very weak record of Paleoindian occupation within park boundaries represented by two isolated, surface discoveries, and three typologically non-diagnostic, non-stratified basalt knives. Of the three represented ‘sites’, only one potentially represents Alpine land use within GNP and may or may not be related to Paleoindian activities. This paper examines this lone Paleoindian alpine site in order to extract a logical explanation of its deposition and to offer up possible evidence of early human occupation in one of the more remote and inaccessible regions of GNP.
    [Show full text]
  • FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics
    FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics BACKGROUND Reservation Overview Regional Geologic Overview GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW Geologic History Summary of Play Types CONVENTIONAL PLAY TYPES Play 1 - Shallow Cretaceous Biogenic Gas Play Play 2 - Northern Plains Biogenic Gas Play Plays 3,4,5 - Jurassic/Cretaceous and Mississippian Plays UNCONVENTIONAL / HYPOTHETICAL PLAY TYPES Plays 6,7 - Fractured Bakken and Cambrian Sandstone Plays REFERENCES Historical Background of the OVERVIEW (i.e. joint ventures) in contrast to procedures and regulatory minimums imposed Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes at Fort Belknap by the previous 1938 Minerals Leasing Act. The 1982 Act further provides that FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION The Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was created in 1887 as the home for the individual Indian allottees may join agreements negotiated for tribal lands. The Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Indian Tribes. The ancestors of these tribes have section entitled Operating Regulations discusses the procedures for obtaining lived on the northern plains for several centuries. The Assiniboine were allottee participance in the negotiated agreement. recognized by Europeans as part of the great Sioux Nation and speak a Siouan Principal components for the formal corporate proposal should include the TRIBAL HEADQUARTERS: Fort Belknap Agency, Montana language. However, their name is taken from a Chippewa word referring to area(s) of interest, type of contract, elaboration of proposed agreement terms, GEOLOGIC SETTING: Williston Basin "those who cook with stones." At some point in time the Assiniboine bands points of potential negotiation, diligence commitments (i.e. drilling), bonus broke with the traditional Sioux and allied themselves with the Cree.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM B
    NFS Fbnn 10-900 'Oitntf* 024-0019 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I * II b 1995 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM iNTERAGENCY RBOr- „ NATIONAL i3AR: 1. Name of Property fe NAllUNAL HhblbiLH d»vu,su historic name: Glacier National Park Tourist Trails: Inside Trail; South Circle; North Circle other name/site number Glacier National Park Circle Trails 2. Location street & number N/A not for publication: n/a vicinity: Glacier National Park (GLAC) city/town: N/A state: Montana code: MT county: Flathead; Glacier code: 29; 35 zip code: 59938 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1988, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally X statewide _ locally. ( See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ) 9. STgnatuTBof 'certifying official/Title National Park Service State or Federal agency or bureau In my opinion, thejiuipKty. does not meet the National Register criteria. gj-^ 1B> 2 9 1995. Signature of commenting or other o Date Montana State Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service
    [Show full text]
  • Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana Laura Evilsizer University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Evilsizer, Laura, "Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10670. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10670 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KNIFE RIVER FLINT DISTRIBUTION AND IDENTIFICATION IN MONTANA By Laura Jean Evilsizer B.A. Anthropology, Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA, 2011 Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage University of Montana Missoula, MT May, 2016 Approved By: Scott Wittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Department of Anthropology Dr. John Douglas Department of Anthropology Dr. Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier National Park, 1917
    ~ ________________ ~'i DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR / FRANKLIN K. LANE. SECRETARY NATIONAL PARK SERVI'CE,/ STEPHEN T. MATHER. DIRECTOR GENERAL ~FO ~N GL CIER NAL ONAL PARK Season of 191 7 The Alps of America-Wonderful Tumbled Region Possessing 60 Glaciers. 250 Lakes, and M y Stately Peaks-Precipices 4,000 Feet Deep-Valleys of Astonish­ ing Rugged B auty-Scenery Equaling Any in the World- Large, Excellent Hotels and Comfortable Chalet Camps-Good Roads- The Gunsight Trail Across the Top of the Range-Good Trout Fishing-How to Get There-What to See-What to Wear lor MOUiltain Climbing WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 TI-IE NATIO .... PARKS AT A GLANCE ( Chron010gIca,l.ly In the order of theIr creatIon [Number,14; Total Area, 7,290 Square Miles] NATIONAL AREA PARKS In DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS In order of LOCATION square creation miles H ot Springs •..... Middle H 46 hot springs possessing curative properties-Many hotels and 1832 Arkansa.s boording houses-20 bathhouses under public control. CONTENTS. Yellowstone . ••••. North- 3,348 More geysers than in al1 rest of world together-Boiling 1872 western springs-Mud volcanoes-Petrified forests-Grand Canyon Page. Wyoming of the YelIowstone, remarkable for gorgeous coloring-Large General description_ .. _. _. ........ ..... .... ... ... ...... ........ .. 5 lakes-Many large streams and waterfalls-Vast wilderness A romance in rocks . • _. __ . _. _.. .......................... _. ....... 5 inhabited by deer, elk, bison, moose, antelope, bear, moun- The Lewis overthrust .. __. .... _............................... ...... 6 tain sheep, beaver, etc., constituting greatest wild bird and A general view _ . _____ .. ..... ................................. 6 animal preserve in world-Altitude 6,000 to 11,000 feet- The west side ....
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Molluscan Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation, Montana Julie Amundsen
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Undergraduate Theses and Senior Projects Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 2012 Examining the Molluscan Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation, Montana Julie Amundsen Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/senior-projects Recommended Citation Amundsen, Julie, "Examining the Molluscan Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation, Montana" (2012). Undergraduate Theses and Senior Projects. 108. https://commons.und.edu/senior-projects/108 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I I 11 I I I Examining the molluscan biostratigraphy of the Upper I Cretaceous Judith River Formation, Montana I I By: I Julie Amundsen I Submitted to the University ofNorth Dakota In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation I Grand Forks, No11h Dakota I 05/ 10/2012 II I 1 I I 11 I Amundsen I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I ACKNOWLEDGEME TS ABSTRACT I lNTRODUCTJO I PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION JUDITH RIVER FORMATION I GEOLOG IC HISTORY I HISTORI CAL BACKGRO UN D OVERV IEW OF PREV IO US STUDI ES I LITHOLOGY , SEDIME, roLOGY, STRA rlGRAPHY I PRESENT FIELD WORK AND MOLLUSCAN STUDIES ANALYSIS OF COLLECTIONS I A:-.JALYSIS OF 0RIGfNAL MA NUSCRIPT I FIELD WORK IN MONTANA LAB PROCESSES I RESULTS I DISCUSSION CONCLUSION I APPENDIX I A: MAPS AND FIGURE B: TABLES I C: PLATES I I Amundsen 2 I I I ACK OWLEDGEMENTS I This thesis probably would have not been accomplished if it were not for the help that I have received from many of the people in the geology department.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier National Park Tourist Trails (Inside Trail, South
    NFS Fbnn 10-900 'Oitntf* 024-0019 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I * II b 1995 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM iNTERAGENCY RBOr- „ NATIONAL i3AR: 1. Name of Property fe NAllUNAL HhblbiLH d»vu,su historic name: Glacier National Park Tourist Trails: Inside Trail; South Circle; North Circle other name/site number Glacier National Park Circle Trails 2. Location street & number N/A not for publication: n/a vicinity: Glacier National Park (GLAC) city/town: N/A state: Montana code: MT county: Flathead; Glacier code: 29; 35 zip code: 59938 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1988, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally X statewide _ locally. ( See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ) 9. STgnatuTBof 'certifying official/Title National Park Service State or Federal agency or bureau In my opinion, thejiuipKty. does not meet the National Register criteria. gj-^ 1B> 2 9 1995. Signature of commenting or other o Date Montana State Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Resource Potential of the Kootenay Area of British Columbia
    . OIL AND GAS RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE KOOTENAY AREA OF BRITISH COLUMBIA by Peter Hannigan, P.J. Lee, K.G. Osadetz and K. Olsen-Heise Petroleum Resources Subdivision Institute of Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology Geological Survey of Canada 3303 - 33 Street N.W. Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7 April, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND PLAY PARAMETERS 7 Waterton Colorado Foothills Gas Play 7 Waterton Mannville Foothills Gas Play 8 Waterton Mannville Foothills Oil Play 9 Waterton Rundle/Wabamun Foothills Gas Play 9 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Gas Play 10 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Oil Play 12 MacDonald Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 12 Fernie - Elk Valley Mesozoic Structural Gas Play 14 Fernie - Elk Valley Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 15 Rocky Mountain Trench Cenozoic Structural Gas Play 16 Belt - Purcell Structural Oil and Gas Play 17 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Oil Play 17 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Gas Play 19 Belt - Purcell Conceptual Structural Oil Play 19 Belt - Purcell Conceptual Structural Gas Play 19 Belt - Purcell Speculative Structural Gas Play 20 Belt - Purcell Speculative Structural Oil Play 20 ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE 20 RESOURCE APPRAISAL 21 Waterton Colorado Foothills Gas Play 21 Waterton Mannville Foothills Gas Play 22 Waterton Mannville Foothills Oil Play 22 Waterton Rundle/Wabamun Foothills Gas Play 22 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Gas Play 23 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Oil Play 23 MacDonald Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 23 Fernie - Elk Valley Mesozoic Structural Gas Play 23 Fernie - Elk Valley Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 24 Rocky Mountain Trench Cenozoic Structural Gas Play 24 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Oil Play 24 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Gas Play 25 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 25 REFERENCES 28 APPENDIX 1: PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS AND RISK FACTORS 44 APPENDIX 2: STATISTICAL OUTPUT 61 FIGURE CAPTIONS 160 SUMMARY There are sixteen exploration hydrocarbon plays identified in the Kootenay area of southeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 St. Mary-Belly River
    Chapter 25 State: Montana Recovery Unit Name: Saint Mary - Belly River Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and in this case with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State agencies, Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 25, St. Mary- Belly River Recovery Unit, Montana. 134 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following groups and individuals contributed to the development of the Saint Mary - Belly River Recovery Unit chapter, either by active participation in the recovery unit team or through contributions to previous planning efforts: The Montana Bull Trout Scientific Group: Chris Clancy, Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Gary Decker, Bitterroot National Forest Les Evarts, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Wade Fredenberg, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Tracks in the Judith River Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of South-Central Montana
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org TURTLE TRACKS IN THE JUDITH RIVER FORMATION (UPPER CRETACEOUS) OF SOUTH-CENTRAL MONTANA Anthony R. Fiorillo ABSTRACT A trackway, probably made by a large terrestrial turtle, is reported from Hidden Valley Quarry, Judith River Formation, Golden Valley County, south-central Montana. These fossil tracks are compared to modern tracks of Galapagos tortoises (Geoche- lone elephantopus) in captivity on substrates with variable moisture content. The fossil tracks were made on fine-grained substrate saturated with water. Further, in conjunc- tion with traces of burrows likely produced by worm-like orangisms, these turtle tracks suggest a feeding behavior analogous to modern wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta). After detecting the underground movements of worms, wood turtles have been shown to alter their movements in such a manner that has been referred to as a stomp. A sim- ilar behavior may have occurred in the Cretaceous turtle track maker. Dallas Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 150349, Dallas, Texas, 75315, USA. [email protected] KEY WORDS: Fossil turtle; Galapagos tortoise; Cretaceous, Upper; Judith River Formation; Montana PE Article Number: 8.1.9 Copyright: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. May 2005 Submission: 26 May 2004. Acceptance: 7 March 2005 INTRODUCTION quarry excavations have provided important pale- ontological insights into dinosaur phylogeny (Dod- The purpose of this report is to document the son 1986; Dodson and Currie 1990), behavior, and occurrence of turtle tracks in the Judith River For- taphonomy. For example, Careless Creek Quarry mation of south-central Montana in the Hidden Val- produced an abundance of juvenile hadrosaurian ley Quarry (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]