Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
III. Objectives
IV. Methodology
V. Sample Profile
VI. Findings
VII. Annexes
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 1
Executive Summary
The Tsunami Beneficiary survey is a series that aims at setting indicators for a rehabilitation process from the point of view of the recipient of the aid and thereby establish a benchmark for the recovery process and create indices for the NGOs and other agencies involved. In the first wave a total of 1140 respondents were surveyed via one to one interviews from a semi structured questionnaire. While assessing the satisfaction levels of the tsunami victims in terms of the housing etcetera, their real situation was also documented by the enumerators. The following are some of the particular findings of the survey:
COMPARISONS
While 88.3% of persons in Ampara have only electricity facilities, high percentages across the board, including 91.7% in Matara have both electricity and piped water.
Aside from 70% of Hambantota, most people in all districts feel that their present housing is not at a safe distance from the shore.
A total of 77.2% of people in Galle feel that the material of their houses is the same as before but the same sentiment is not echoed by 51% of Ampara and 67% of Trincomalee who feel that their situation is now worse. This same fact is reflected to some extent in the enumerator’s observations.
73.7% of persons in Galle and 73% in Matara state that they have received no livelihood support from the Government or Non Governmental sectors, while 54% in Trincomalee and 50.5% state that they have received such aid.
While most people state that medical facilities are the same as before, 48.9% of Ampara feel that the physical structure of their medical facility is worse than before.
A total of 40.4% of Galle and 47.3% of Matara are satisfied with the overall efficiency of the resolution of their problems. The same is not true for a dissatisfied 38.3% of Hambantota.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 2
Most people seem somewhat dissatisfied with Beneficiary Consultation procedures with the exception of 46.3% of Ampara who are somewhat satisfied. OTHER
High percentages across the board, such as 93.7% in Galle and 90.1% in Matara use their own toilets – a statistic that has not changed significantly since the tsunami.
No district in particular has had any difficulty with their water supply.
A majority of the sample in all four districts feel that the quality of their water supply is the same as before.
High percentages express no great dissatisfaction with the state of the infrastructure surrounding them.
While the percentage of persons involved in the fishing trade has dropped slightly, fishing still remains the main occupation in these communities.
Across the board, school conditions seem to be the same as before.
68.6% in Trincomalee state that the government has never consulted them with regards to the rehabilitation process., and 58.2% in Ampara say that NGOs consulted them only to some extent.
Only 1.2% in Ampara and 1.3% in Trincomalee are very satisfied with the ease of receiving benefits.
In general, people are somewhat dissatisfied with complaint redress mechanisms.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 3
Introduction
The 2004 Boxing Day tsunami wreaked havoc on the coastal region of five Asian countries. Thousands lost their lives, homes and jobs. The subsequent recovery and rehabilitation efforts were multi-million dollar projects funded by various humanitarian agencies and governments from all over the world. In Sri Lanka, especially, pledges of tsunami aid have topped US $ 3 billion, and many agencies initiated housing schemes, vocational training projects and so on and so forth so as to restore the tsunami affected to their previous way of life. The Tsunami Recovery Impact Assessment and Monitoring System (TRIAMS) was created in order to have in place a monitoring system that makes periodic assessments of the tsunami recovery process, and thereby understand the impact of tsunami response efforts. The TRIAMS Country Action Plan for Sri Lanka includes both quantitative and qualitative explorations of the tsunami recovery process. As part of this quantitative research, Social Indicator was commissioned by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to design and implement a perception survey that will be conducted twice a year for a period of three years, the findings of which will provide an assessment of the entire process from the recipient’s point of view. Since the findings of the survey are quantifiable, the results will enable authorities to compare the reconstruction process across different districts and sectors.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 4
Objectives
The overarching objective of the survey is to do a basic evaluation of the quality of the life of the affected and to assess if their present state is better than before the tsunami. With a view to this the survey will:
Identify to what extent losses and disruption in affected GNDs were restored with regards to General Amenities, Infrastructure, Health, Education, and Sanitation etcetera.
Assess as to whether living conditions and livelihoods of affected areas have returned to levels and standards that were previously existent.
Find out if recovery efforts are targeting the right areas.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 5
Methodology
The beneficiary survey was carried out using a structured questionnaire administered through a face to face technique amongst a randomly selected sample of 1140 respondents from five tsunami affected districts, namely, Galle, Matara, Hambantota, Ampara, and Trincomalee. The questionnaire was designed to capture the perception and satisfaction of the beneficiaries on the Tsunami recovery process. As this beneficiary survey intends to measure the satisfaction of the beneficiaries regarding the Tsunami reconstruction process, while comparing with the other output indices produced by the various agencies, SI used some of the publications of TRIAMS and other UN reports in the creation of the questionnaire. The sample concentrated itself on the affected Divisional Secretariats (DS) within the aforementioned districts. In the Southern province, affected DSDs were randomly selected from each district as the first level of sampling. Further, four Grama Niladharis (GN) divisions were selected at random from each of these Divisional Secretariats. Lists of the tsunami beneficiaries were then obtained for these GNs in order to eliminate the chance of accidental visits to non-affected households, and fifteen households from each listing were randomly chosen to participate in the interview. At this point, the 'last birthday' method was used in order to determine which household member would be the respondent to the survey. In this manner, sixty households were surveyed in each DS.
Due to the prevailing securing situation fieldwork in the Eastern province was confined and restricted to certain locales. However, within the selected Grama Niladharis (GN) divisions, households and respondents were chosen using the same technique that was used in the Southern province. Due to this purposive sampling selection at the district and the DSDs level, findings of surveys in the Eastern province cannot be generalised to the entire province but to the respective GNDs.
The field work was conducted by 17 senior enumerators from April 20th to May 23rd, 2007. They were given an intensive training on 17th April 2007, on the questionnaire and field techniques. In addition to accompanied visits and over-the-phone consultation, 20% of the field work was rechecked in order to assure its quality.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 6
FINDINGS
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 7
HOUSING
Please identify the following with regards to the ownership of your house (Before Tsunami)
120
98.9 100
81.3 78 78.1 80 Rented Own with deed 60 55.7 Own without deed 40.0 Relatives/Friends 40
17.1 16.7 20 15.9 5.6 4.3 2.9 2 0.4 1.1 1 1 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 8
Please identify the following with regards to the ownership of your house (After Tsunami)
120
100 97.8
Rented 80 77.3 76.4 75.9 72.6 Own with deed
60 Own without deed
Relatives/Friends 40
22.7 Tsunami camp/Temp 19.5 16.7 House 20 12.6 3.9 8.4 2.6 2.1 4.2 2.1 2 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.6 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 9
Please identify the material of your house (Before Tsunami)
90 83.5 80.9 79 77.6 80
70 66.3
60 Wooden 50 Mud Hut 40 Cement/Tiled
30 Other 21.1 20 15.3 13.2 11.5 10.5 7.5 9.1 10 6.3 3.1 3.8 3.8 2.6 1.8 1.1 2.1 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 10
Please identify the material of your house (After Tsunami)
100 91.0 90.8 90 81.9 82.2
80 73.2 70
60 Wooden Mud Hut 50 Cement/Tiled 40 Other
30 21.6 20 13.3 12.2 10 7.7 8.6 4.4 3.5 2.2 2.5 1.7 1.4 0.6 1.1 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 11
Please identify the space (area sq feet) of your house (Before Tsunami)
50 46.9 45
40 Less than 200 sqft 35 201 - 400 sqft 30.9 30 27.9 25.6 401 - 600 sqft 25 24.5 22.8 22.6 23.4 21.1 21.9 601 - 800 sqft 18.9 20 17.7 17.7 17.8 16.2 17.2 801 - 1000 sqft 15.3 15.6 15 12 11.4 11.511.1 10.6 Above 1000 10 10.4 10 9.4 sqft
4.2 5 3.4 1.3 1 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 12
Please identify the space (area sq feet) of your house (After Tsunami)
50 43.8 45 43.0
40
35 31.8 Less than 200 sqft 30 27.9 26.2 201 - 400 sqft 25.3 24 401 - 600 sqft 25 21.9 20.4 21.8 18.8 601 - 800 sqft 17.7 20 16.8 16.7 16.5 801 - 1000 sqft 14.6 15 13.1 12.9 11.7 Above 1000 sqft 11.5 11.5 11.2 10.6 10 7.7 8.1 5.5 3.1 5 3 3 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 13
Please identify the facilities in your house (Before Tsunami)
100 86.7 90 86.1 Electricity only 80
70 Piped Water only 60 55.7 53.7 51.9 50 43 Electricity & Pipe Water 40 35.1
30 Neither Electricity nor Pipe 19.7 20 Water 12.3 12.3 11.4 8.4 10.4 10 4 1.9 1.8 1.5 0.9 2.6 0.6 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 14
Please identify the facilities in your house (After Tsunami)
100 91.7 88.3 90 85.1
80 Electricity only 70
60 Piped Water only 52.4 49.3 50 44.9 Electricity & Pipe Water
40 30.7 Neither Electricity nor Pipe Water 30
20 14.7 10.9 9.3 10 5.3 0.9 1.8 4.4 3.1 0.9 1.8 2.3 1.9 0.6 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 15
Do you feel that your present residence is at a safe distance from the shore?
90 78.7 80 75.4 70.7 68.5 70
60 49.1 50.9 50 Ye s
40 No 31.5 29.3 30 24.6 21.3 20
10
0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 16
With regards to the following please identify how conditions have changed post-tsunami:
Material (Householder’s response)
100% 6.6 3.9
26.8 80% 51.1
67 Worse than before 60% 70 77.2 40.4 Same as before
40% Better than before 34.8 19.8 20% 24.7 Much better than before 21.9 12.4 14 11 4.3 8.1 0% 3.7 2.2 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 17
Material (Enumerator’s observations)
100% 6 6.4 16.4 90% 10.6 11.2
80% 41.3 19.4 49.5 70%
60% Poor 54.9 Adequate 50% 71.2 Good 31.3 40% 48.3 Excellent 32.6 30%
20% 28.6 23.5 10% 15.9 16.8 11.2 0% 3.9 1.1 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 18
Quality of the house (Householder’s response)
100% 9.9 16.2 90% 29.9 80% 38.8
70% 62.2 48.1 60% Worse than before 65 50% 39.3 Same as before
40% 41 Better than before Much better than before 30% 13.3 36.9 20% 22.6 20 10% 14.5 18.5 5.2 8.1 4.4 0% 4.3 1.7 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 19
Space (Householder’s response)
100% 9.2 7.7 13.6 90% 27.2 34.4 80%
70%
60% Worse than before 74.1 75.1 66.7 Same as before 50% 42.6 40 Better than before 40% Much better than before
30%
20% 22.6 21.1 10% 13.3 12.9 18.1 4.3 7.7 1.7 4.4 0% 3.5 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 20
Space (Enumerator’s observations)
100% 12.4 13.8 90% 12.9 20.5
80% 14.7 14.6 37.9
70% 24.0
60% 54.6 Poor Adequate 50% 50 56.7 Good 40% 43.2 Excellent 41.5 30% 19.2 20% 12.6 10% 23 15.9 14.0 12.3 6.3 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 21
Facilities (Householder’s response)
100% 4.7 15 90% 26.0 34.5 80%
56.7 70% Worse than before 60% 82 Same as before 44.3 50% 71.8 Better than before 40% 48
30% 23.3 Much better than before
20% 22.1 15.6 10% 10.1 12.4 17.5 7.7 4.4 0% 3.2 0.9 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 22
Facilities (Enumerator’s observations)
100% 5.6 14 12.9 90% 10.7 26.8 30.5 10 80% 18.5 70%
60% 44.2 Poor Adequate 50% 44.1 55.6 44.2 48.3 Good 40% Excellent
30%
20% 39.5 21.8 20 10% 20.3 20.3 7.3 5.3 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 23
GENERAL AMENITIES/ SANITATION/ INFRASTRUCTURE
Please identify if you use your own toilets or a common toilet presently
120
96.6 100 93.7 90.1 89.8
80 69.5 Your own toilets Common toilets 60 Shared toilets No toilets 40
24.2 20 5.7 7.3 3.4 5.1 5.3 2.6 3.4 1.1 0.6 1.7 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 24
Please identify if you used your own toilet or common toilets before the tsunami
100 91.8 92.7 89.2 90 82.7
80 72.8 70
60 Your own toilets Common toilets 50 Shared toilets 40 No toilets
30
20 14.8 9.1 9.2 8.6 6.2 6.0 8.1 10 3.7 1.2 0.9 1.7 1.3 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 25
Have you had any issues with your water supply since the tsunami? If yes, please identify.
90
79.7 80
68.5 70
60 56.7
49.1 50 Water unclean/unfit for use Technical difficulty Source at inconvenient distance 40 39.3 34.2 Other 31.8 No Problem
30 26.1 22.8 23.9 21.7 18.8 20 13.7
9.2 7.6 10 8.1 7.3 7.3 7.2 4.3 3.3 3.3 1.3 0.6 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 26
Please evaluate the following, post-tsunami:
Quality of the water supply
100% 3 9.8 90% 20.9 33 80% 35.6
70%
60% Worse than before 53.5 Same as before 50% 92.2 88.2 Better than before 40% 47.2 52.5 Much better than before
30%
20% 25.6 10% 1.2 2.6 15.9 14 0% 0.9 2.2 1.3 0.6 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 27
Access to the water supply
100% 1.7 12.4 90% 24.9 21.8 80% 34.6
70% Worse than before
60% Same as before 93 50% 52.9 83.6 55.4 40% Better than before 59.8 30% Much better than before 20% 23 10% 18.5 3.2 3 5.6 0% 0.9 2.2 1.3 2.3 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 28
Roads and bridges
100% 9.2 6 90% 16.7 16.7 19.1
80%
70% 52.6 Worse than before 38.2 60% 50 47.2 75.3 50% Same as before
40% Better than before
30% 42.1 Much better than 20% 40.9 27.8 before 33.7 10% 15.5 5.6 0% 0.4 3.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 29
Streetlights
100% 3.5 4 7.7 90% 15.9 27.4 80%
70% Worse than before 60% 64.8 56.1 85.1 89.1 50% Same as before
40% 62.3 Better than before 30% Much better than before 20% 24.0 28 10% 10.9 7.4 10.3 0% 3.4 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 30
Drainage systems
100% 5.2 12.1 10.8 25.9 31.5 80% Worse than before
Same as before 60% 75.9 74.6 48.2 Better than before 85.1 40% 55.2 Much better than before
20% 25.9 18.5 12.9 13.3 0% 2.9 0.4 1.7 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 31
LIVELIHOOD AND ECONOMIC SECURITY
What was your main source of income prior to the Tsunami?
60.0 52.9
50.0
40.3 Fishing 40.0 34.8 34.5 35.8 34.5 Agriculture Merchant 29.3 30.0 Manual Laborer 25.2 24.2 Mechanic 20.3 18.8 19.4 Unemployed 20.0 16.4 Other 11.2 12.1 12.9 9.8 10.2 10.7 10.0 6.9 6.9 4.9 4.1 3.4 3.2 3.5 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.4 2.6 1.0 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 32
What is your main source of income at present?
60.0
49.8 50.0
Fishing 40.0 35.8 32.4 Agriculture 30.6 27.9 Merchant 30.0 26.3 Manual Laborer 22.0 21.9 21.0 Mechanic 17.9 17.5 20.0 16.0 16.1 Unemployed 14.9 14.5 11.4 Other 11.1 9.8 9.3 10.7 9.7 9.8 9.3 10.0 8.0 8.1 8.8 4.9 5.3 4.8 3.2 1.72.8 1.6 2.4 2.6 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 33
Have you received any livelihood recovery and support related assistance from either the government sector or the non-governmental sector?
80.0 73.7 73.0 67.8 70.0
60.0 54.0 50.5 49.5 50.0 46.0
Ye s 40.0 NO 32.2
30.0 26.3 27.0
20.0
10.0
0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 34
How would you describe the condition of your livelihood, post-tsunami:
100%
90%
80% 52.6 54.7 51.8 70% 64.1 71.2 60% Worse than before
50% Same as before
40% Better than before 29.5 30% Much better than before 36.5 35.9 20% 27.4 12.4 25.4 10% 10.2 9.4 7.7 1.7 0% 0.8 0.0 6.2 0.9 1.7 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 35
MEDICAL/HEALTH
How would you describe the state of the following since the tsunami?
Cleanliness of the medical facility
0.4 2.1 100% 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 1.0
80% 38.3 34.4
62.4 73.3 No Response 60% 80.5 Worse than before 13.3 29.2 Same as before Better than before 40% 20.6 Much better than before
29.2 20% 33.3 21.1 27.2 18.4 5.2 8.2 0% 0.3 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 36
Efficiency of the treatment received
0.6 0.0 2.1 4.2 100% 0.4 0.4 2.1 90%
80% 37.8
70% 46.9 No Response 60% 79.3 74.7 82.8 Worse than before 50% 19.4 Same as before Better than before 40% 20.0 Much better than before 30% 35.4 20% 18.5 10% 19.8 22.8 16.7 11.5 0% 0.4 4.3 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 37
Availability of the medical staff
1.4 0.4 100% 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 5.2 5.2 2.1
32.8 80%
46.9 67.2 No Response 60% Worse than before 82.8 77.3 24.4 Same as before Better than before 40% Much better than before 18.3 34.4
20% 25.4
15.0 23.9 15.2 11.5 6.5 2.1 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 38
Condition of the physical structure
0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 2.1 100% 2.0 0.4 1.3 1.0 90%
80% 29.2 48.9 70% 59.5 66.1 No Response 60% 81.6 Worse than before 50% 36.5 Same as before 15.0 Better than before 40% Much better than before 30% 8.9 28.9 20% 29.6 26.7 31.3 10% 15.6 10.8 2.6 0% 0.3 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 39
EDUCATION
How would you describe the following since the tsunami?
Quality of the teaching staff
100% 0.9 1.6 4.3 3.3 6.0
80% 40.7 49.0 54.1
60% Worse than before 81.1 93.0 Same as before Better than before 40% Much better than before
51.2 30.0 42.6 20%
14.6 15.0 6.1 4.9 1.6 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 40
Quantity of the teaching staff
100% 0.9 3.3 4.8 9.7 6.1 90%
80%
70% 47.5 52.5 43.5 60% Worse than before 80.6 92.2 Same as before 50% Better than before 40% Much better than before
30% 32.3 41.9 20% 44.3
10% 13.9 14.1 0.6 7.0 4.8 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 41
Space to room all students
100% 0.8 4.2 6.1 3.3 90% 19.4
80% 38.7 18.4 47.5 70% 51.3
60% 69.3 Worse than before Same as before 50% Better than before 40% 46.9 Much better than before 53.2 30% 41.0
20% 40.9 19.9 10% 15.3 6.6 7.3 8.2 0% 1.7 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 42
Condition of the physical structure
100% 4.2 5.0 12.2 90% 17.5 34.1 80%
22.7 46.7 70% 39.1 66.9 60% Worse than before Same as before 50% Better than before 40% 39.2 Much better than before 61.8 30% 40.0 47.8 20% 21.1 10% 20.6 7.8 8.3 0% 0.9 4.1 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 43
Distance to the school
100% 5.4 3.5 6.6 15.2 90% 18.5
80%
70%
60% Worse than before 75.4 59.7 Same as before 50% 90.4 94.8 67.7 Better than before 40% Much better than before
30%
20%
21.0 10% 13.1 18.0 2.4 0% 1.8 0 1.7 0.8 4.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 44
OVERALL EVALUATIONS
As of today which of the following agencies consulted you/received your input in the design and execution of the rehabilitation process?
Government
80.0
68.6 70.0
60.0 55.8 51.1 51.7 50.0 44.4 42.4 Yes to a fairly large extent Yes but only some extent 40.0 35.9 34.5 No we were never consulted 28.2 No response 30.0 25.4 23.3
20.0 12.4 7.7 10.0 7.0 3.9 2.0 2.6 2.1 1.2 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 45
NGOs
80.0
68.2 70.0 62.9 58.2 60.0 57.5
50.0 41.9 Yes to a fairly large extent 40.0 Yes but only some extent 35.5 32.2 30.6 No we were never consulted 27.7 30.0 25.9 22.6 No response
20.0
8.3 9.2 10.0 3.9 5.0 4.7 2.0 2.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 46
International Agencies
90.0
77.9 80.0 72.3 69.8 69.4 70.0
60.0 Yes to a fairly large extent 50.0 41.0 37.6 Yes but only some extent 40.0
30.0 No we were never consulted 23.5 22.2 20.9 18.2 20.0 15.7 No response 12.0
10.0 6.0 4.7 3.0 2.4 2.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 47
Political parties/politicians
100.0
90.0 86.6 81.6 79.5 80.0 80.0 76.9
70.0 Yes to a fairly large extent 60.0 Yes but only some extent 50.0 No we were never consulted 40.0 No response 30.0 20.1 20.0 11.1 9.0 13.3 10.6 9.4 5.1 10.0 2.6 4.3 3.6 0.6 1.7 3.6 0.4 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 48
Religious organisations
90.0 79.4 80.0 73.8 70.6 70.0 66.2
60.0 50.6 50.0 Yes to a fairly large extent
40.0 Yes but only some extent
No we were never consulted 30.0 26.5 23.5 21.4 20.1 No response 20.0 17.2 15.7 9.0 7.2 10.0 4.4 4.7 4.7 0.9 2.6 1.2 0.4 0.0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 49
To what extent are you satisfied with the role played/services provided by the following institutions/persons in terms of assisting you to rebuild your
life?
Gramaseva Niladhari
100%
14 17.6 10.1 21.8 25.3 11.7 80% 14.6
24 21.8 17.6 60% 36.3 Very Dissatisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied 52.3 40% 32.6 Somewhat Satisfied 42.4 45.1 Very Satisfied
20% 41.9 25.8 19 14 12.1 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 50
Office of Divisional Secretary
100% 5.2 8.6 13.3 11.5 90% 9.8 19.8
80% 20.3 18.7 26.5 15.1 70% Very Dissatisfied 60% Somewhat Dissatisfied 65.3 50% Somewhat Satisfied 56.7 38.9 40% 57.1 51.2 Very Satisfied
30%
20%
10% 23.1 19.7 14.4 10.9 14 0% Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 51
Armed Forces
100% 0.6 2 7.7 3 6.3 7.4 9.8 3.4 6.3
80% 22.3 33.3 61 Very Dissatisfied 60% 60.3 Somewhat Dissatisfied 78 Somewhat Satisfied 40% Very Satisfied 68.3 54.9
20% 35.4 28.6
9.4 0% 2 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 52
Business Community
100% 4.9
90% 14.8 21.6 27.7 80% 40.6 51.3 70%
60% Very Dissatisfied 27.2 8.5 Somewhat Dissatisfied 50% 56.8 10.1 Somewhat Satisfied 40% 77.9 34.9 Very Satisfied 30% 41.3 29.4 20%
18.9 10% 16 9.2 0% 3.9 2.5 2.7 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 53
NGOs/INGOs
100%
90% 29.7 30.9 38.3 29.9 80% 39.6
70% Dissatisfied 13.2 60% 24.7 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 30.5 50% 24.3 Satisfied 40% 41.8 47.3 Very satisfied 30% 40.4 20% 30.6 39
10% 18.7 5.2 8.6 6.8 0% 0.6 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 54
With regards to any issues you have encountered how satisfied are you with the efficiency of their resolution?
50 47.3
45 41.8 40.4 39 39.6 40 38.3
35 Very satisfied 30.9 30.5 29.7 30.6 29.9 30 Satisfied 24.7 24.3 25 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 18.7 20 Dissatisfied 15 13.2
8.6 10 6.8 5.2 5 0.6 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 55
Please evaluate the different aspects of the reconstruction and rehabilitation measures.
Beneficiary Consultation
60
50.7 50 46.3 42.6 Very Satisfied 39.7 40 37.2 35.8 35.1 Somewhat Satisfied 33.8 33.3 32 29.4 30 Somewhat Dissatisfied 23.7
19.3 Very Dissatisfied 20 14 14.7
10
2.4 2.7 2.2 2.4 2.7
0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 56
Ease of receiving benefits
60
48.7 49.4 50
40.7 38.8 Very Satisfied 40 38.9 37.6 36.2 35.8 31.6 Somewhat Satisfied 30 25.5 23.5 Somewhat Dissatisfied 19.8 17.7 20 16.6 Very Dissatisfied 13.7 14.2
10 3.9 5.2 1.2 1.3 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 57
Complaint redress mechanisms
60
50 50 44.9 45.1 Very Satisfied 39 39.5 40 36.7 34.5 35.2 Somewhat Satisfied 30.2 28.9 30 Somewhat 22.3 20.6 20.4 Dissatisfied 18.4 20 17.1 Very Dissatisfied
10 4.9 3.7 3.9 2.2 2.3
0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 58
Overall satisfaction
60
51.2 48.7 50
41.8 41.5 39.7 Very Satisfied 40 38.4 35 34.1 Somewhat Satisfied 30.7 30.8 30 23.8 Somewhat Dissatisfied 19.7 20 17.9 Very Dissatisfied 14.1 13.4
10 6.5 5.6 4 2.6 0.6 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 59
Have you been made aware of/ participated in Tsunami Evacuation Drills?
100 92.7 89.3 90 80.2 80
70
60 54.6 55.3 Yes 50 45.4 44.7 No 40
30 19.8 20 10.7 7.3 10
0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
* Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 60
Overall how would you evaluate your current lifestyle with that which you previously led?
80
70 66.7 62.6
60 51.9 Much better than 48 48.3 before 50 Better than before 39.7 40 36.1 32.5 32.4 Same as before
30 25 Worse than before
20 12 11.5 9.8 7.7 10 7.3 4.5 2.6 0.6 1 0 Galle Matara Hambantota Ampara Trincomalee
Due to the existing security situation, fieldwork in the Eastern provinces cannot be generalised to the entire population but to the respective GNDs.
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 61
*
ANNEXES
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 62
DIVISIONAL BREAKDOWNS
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 63
Sample profile
District DS Division Sample
Galle Ambalangoda 60 Balapitiya 57 Bentota 60 Galle Four Gravets 54 Habaraduwa 59 Hikkaduwa 61 Total 351 Matara Devinuwara 59 Dikwella 54 Matara Four Gravets 60 Weligama 60 Total 233 Hambantota Ambalantota 60 Hambantota 60 Tangalle 55 Tissamaharama 60 Total 235 Ampara Akkaraipattu 60 Kalmunai Muslim 60 Ninthavur 60 Total 180 Trincomalee Kinniya 60 Town & Gravets 36 Total 96 GRAND TOTAL 1095
TRIAMS Beneficiary Survey 2007 64
Please identify the following with regards to the ownership of your house( After Tsunami)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Rented 1 1.7% 1 1.8% 3 5.8% 1 1.7% 1 1.7% Own with deed 44 74.6% 43 75.4% 51 86.4% 19 36.5% 54 93.1% 50 84.7% Own without deed 13 22.0% 8 14.0% 8 13.6% 28 53.8% 3 5.2% 7 11.9% Relatives/Friends 1 1.7% 5 8.8% 2 3.8% 1 1.7% Tsunami camp/Temp
House Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 59 100.0% 52 100.0% 58 100.0% 59 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Rented 2 3.7% 2 3.3% 1 1.7% Own with deed 44 74.6% 30 55.6% 55 91.7% 51 85.0% Own without deed 15 25.4% 14 25.9% 3 5.0% 7 11.7% Relatives/Friends 8 14.8% 1 1.7% Tsunami camp/Temp
House Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Rented 1 1.7% Own with deed 4 6.8% 16 27.1% 33 55.0% Own without deed 55 93.2% 42 71.2% 55 100.0% 26 43.3% Relatives/Friends Tsunami camp/Temp 1 1.7% House Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Rented 2 3.3% 4 11.1% 19 1.8% Own with deed 58 96.7% 59 98.3% 59 98.3% 57 96.6% 12 33.3% 739 68.1% Own without deed 1 1.7% 8 22.2% 293 27.0% Relatives/Friends 2 5.6% 20 1.8% Tsunami camp/Temp 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 10 27.8% 14 1.3% House Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,085 100.0% Please answer the following with regards to the physical space of your house( After Tsunami)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Less than 200 sqft 9 15.0% 19 33.3% 15 25.0% 9 16.7% 3 5.1% 3 4.9% 201 - 400 sqft 5 8.3% 8 14.0% 15 25.0% 12 22.2% 16 27.1% 10 16.4% 401 - 600 sqft 4 6.7% 11 19.3% 14 23.3% 21 38.9% 24 40.7% 18 29.5% 601 - 800 sqft 6 10.0% 8 14.0% 11 18.3% 3 5.6% 4 6.8% 14 23.0% 801 - 1000 sqft 5 8.3% 3 5.3% 4 6.7% 7 11.9% 8 13.1% Above 1000 sqft 31 51.7% 8 14.0% 1 1.7% 9 16.7% 5 8.5% 8 13.1% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Less than 200 sqft 31 52.5% 21 38.9% 7 11.7% 201 - 400 sqft 19 32.2% 18 33.3% 12 20.0% 7 11.7% 401 - 600 sqft 7 11.9% 7 13.0% 21 35.0% 39 65.0% 601 - 800 sqft 1 1.7% 3 5.6% 14 23.3% 12 20.0% 801 - 1000 sqft 1 1.7% 1 1.9% 5 8.3% Above 1000 sqft 4 7.4% 1 1.7% 2 3.3% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Less than 200 sqft 13 21.7% 1 1.8% 13 21.7% 201 - 400 sqft 19 31.7% 12 21.8% 17 28.3% 401 - 600 sqft 40 66.7% 11 18.3% 41 74.5% 9 15.0% 601 - 800 sqft 5 8.3% 14 23.3% 801 - 1000 sqft 6 10.0% 1 1.8% 6 10.0% Above 1000 sqft 20 33.3% 6 10.0% 1 1.7% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Less than 200 sqft 6 10.2% 6 10.0% 8 13.3% 8 13.3% 8 22.2% 180 16.5% 201 - 400 sqft 8 13.6% 12 20.0% 10 16.7% 1 1.7% 20 55.6% 221 20.2% 401 - 600 sqft 14 23.7% 24 40.0% 12 20.0% 34 56.7% 8 22.2% 359 32.8% 601 - 800 sqft 18 30.5% 14 23.3% 7 11.7% 14 23.3% 148 13.5% 801 - 1000 sqft 8 13.6% 3 5.0% 8 13.3% 3 5.0% 69 6.3% Above 1000 sqft 5 8.5% 1 1.7% 15 25.0% 117 10.7% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,094 100.0%
Please answer the following with regards to your house's facilities. ( After Tsunami)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Electricity only 6 10.3% 19 38.0% 44 80.0% 4 7.8% 43 74.1% 33 55.0% Piped Water only 1 1.7% 2 3.9% Electricity & Pipe 50 86.2% 30 60.0% 10 18.2% 43 84.3% 15 25.9% 26 43.3% Water Neither Electricity nor 1 1.7% 1 2.0% 1 1.8% 2 3.9% 1 1.7% Pipe Water Total 58 100.0% 50 100.0% 55 100.0% 51 100.0% 58 100.0% 60 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Electricity only 3 5.1% 3 5.9% 4 6.7% Piped Water only 2 3.4% 3 5.9% 1 1.7% 1 1.7% Electricity & Pipe 52 88.1% 45 88.2% 58 98.3% 55 91.7% Water Neither Electricity nor 2 3.4% Pipe Water Total 59 100.0% 51 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Electricity only 5 8.5% 19 39.6% Piped Water only 4 6.8% Electricity & Pipe 59 100.0% 46 78.0% 55 100.0% 28 58.3% Water Neither Electricity nor 4 6.8% 1 2.1% Pipe Water Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 48 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Electricity only 44 78.6% 57 96.6% 42 89.4% 19 43.2% 4 12.9% 349 34.2% Piped Water only 1 1.8% 2 4.3% 3 6.8% 1 3.2% 21 2.1% Electricity & Pipe 1 1.8% 22 50.0% 15 48.4% 610 59.9% Water Neither Electricity nor 10 17.9% 2 3.4% 3 6.4% 11 35.5% 39 3.8% Pipe Water Total 56 100.0% 59 100.0% 47 100.0% 44 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,019 100.0%
Do you feel that your house is at a safe distance from the shore?
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 23 38.3% 25 44.6% 43 72.9% 23 42.6% 30 50.8% 25 44.6% No 37 61.7% 31 55.4% 16 27.1% 31 57.4% 29 49.2% 31 55.4% Total 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 56 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 10 16.9% 18 33.3% 18 30.5% 11 18.3% No 49 83.1% 36 66.7% 41 69.5% 49 81.7% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 57 96.6% 26 44.1% 55 100.0% 26 44.1% No 2 3.4% 33 55.9% 33 55.9% Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 59 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 16 27.1% 18 30.0% 4 6.8% 15 26.8% 14 38.9% 457 42.4% No 43 72.9% 42 70.0% 55 93.2% 41 73.2% 22 61.1% 621 57.6% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 56 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,078 100.0% Please indicate your level of satisfaction with regards to the materials of your house
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya BentotaGalle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 7 11.7% 1 1.8% 3 5.0% 2 3.4% before Better than before 9 15.0% 4 7.0% 15 28.8% 12 20.3% 3 5.1% Same as before 37 61.7% 51 89.5% 56 93.3% 29 55.8% 46 78.0% 49 83.1% Worse than before 7 11.7% 1 1.8% 1 1.7% 8 15.4% 1 1.7% 5 8.5% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 52 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 4 6.8% 2 3.3% 4 6.7% before Better than before 2 3.4% 7 13.0% 21 35.0% 21 35.0% Same as before 51 86.4% 42 77.8% 37 61.7% 33 55.0% Worse than before 2 3.4% 5 9.3% 2 3.3% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 8 13.3% 3 5.0% 6 10.9% 2 3.3% before Better than before 25 41.7% 6 10.0% 16 29.1% 11 18.3% Same as before 16 26.7% 34 56.7% 9 16.4% 36 60.0% Worse than before 11 18.3% 17 28.3% 24 43.6% 11 18.3% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.3% 44 4.1% before Better than before 22 36.7% 3 5.2% 7 11.7% 3 9.7% 187 17.3% Same as before 23 38.3% 9 15.0% 30 51.7% 10 16.7% 8 25.8% 606 55.9% Worse than before 15 25.0% 51 85.0% 25 43.1% 41 68.3% 20 64.5% 247 22.8% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 58 100.0% 60 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,084 100.0%
Please rate the quality of the physical structure of the residence - (Enumerator's Observation)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 20 33.9% 40 70.2% 7 11.7% 7 13.0% 7 11.9% 19 31.1% Good 29 49.2% 12 21.1% 41 68.3% 32 59.3% 43 72.9% 35 57.4% Adequate 3 5.1% 3 5.3% 6 10.0% 9 16.7% 9 15.3% 7 11.5% Poor 7 11.9% 2 3.5% 6 10.0% 6 11.1% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 7 11.9% 2 3.7% 7 11.7% 10 16.7% Good 43 72.9% 41 75.9% 47 78.3% 35 58.3% Adequate 6 10.2% 2 3.7% 5 8.3% 13 21.7% Poor 3 5.1% 9 16.7% 1 1.7% 2 3.3% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 24 40.0% 7 11.7% 2 3.6% 4 7.0% Good 16 26.7% 27 45.0% 38 69.1% 31 54.4% Adequate 11 18.3% 16 26.7% 7 12.7% 11 19.3% Poor 9 15.0% 10 16.7% 8 14.5% 11 19.3% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 57 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 1 1.7% 6 10.2% 1 1.7% 171 15.7% Good 11 18.3% 31 52.5% 13 21.7% 3 8.6% 528 48.5% Adequate 29 48.3% 11 18.3% 16 27.1% 13 21.7% 18 51.4% 195 17.9% Poor 19 31.7% 49 81.7% 6 10.2% 33 55.0% 14 40.0% 195 17.9% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,089 100.0%
Please indicate your level of satisfaction with regards to the overall quality of your house
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 7 11.7% 1 1.8% 3 5.0% 4 6.8% before Better than before 9 15.0% 9 16.1% 2 3.3% 13 25.0% 16 27.1% 1 1.7% Same as before 34 56.7% 40 71.4% 47 78.3% 28 53.8% 37 62.7% 39 66.1% Worse than before 10 16.7% 6 10.7% 8 13.3% 11 21.2% 6 10.2% 15 25.4% Total 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 60 100.0% 52 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Matara District DevinuwaraDikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 5 8.5% 3 5.0% 4 6.7% before Better than before 6 10.2% 8 14.8% 39 65.0% 33 55.0% Same as before 37 62.7% 39 72.2% 16 26.7% 20 33.3% Worse than before 11 18.6% 7 13.0% 2 3.3% 3 5.0% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 8 13.3% 3 5.0% 6 10.9% 2 3.4% before Better than before 27 45.0% 8 13.3% 10 18.2% 8 13.6% Same as before 15 25.0% 33 55.0% 7 12.7% 37 62.7% Worse than before 10 16.7% 16 26.7% 32 58.2% 12 20.3% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 59 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.3% 1 1.7% 4 6.8% 53 4.9% before Better than before 26 43.3% 1 1.7% 6 10.3% 15 25.4% 3 9.7% 240 22.2% Same as before 20 33.3% 26 43.3% 27 46.6% 7 11.9% 5 16.1% 514 47.5% Worse than before 12 20.0% 33 55.0% 24 41.4% 33 55.9% 23 74.2% 274 25.3% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 58 100.0% 59 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,081 100.0%
Please indicate your level of satisfaction with regards to the space of your house
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 6 10.0% 3 5.0% 3 5.1% before Better than before 8 13.3% 8 14.0% 4 6.7% 12 23.1% 9 15.3% 5 8.5% Same as before 37 61.7% 43 75.4% 51 85.0% 33 63.5% 48 81.4% 45 76.3% Worse than before 9 15.0% 6 10.5% 2 3.3% 7 13.5% 2 3.4% 6 10.2% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 52 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.4% 4 6.7% 4 6.7% before Better than before 3 5.1% 4 7.4% 8 13.3% 15 25.0% Same as before 50 84.7% 45 83.3% 42 70.0% 38 63.3% Worse than before 4 6.8% 5 9.3% 6 10.0% 3 5.0% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 8 13.3% 3 5.0% 6 10.9% 1 1.7% before Better than before 27 45.0% 6 10.0% 11 20.0% 9 15.0% Same as before 17 28.3% 33 55.0% 11 20.0% 39 65.0% Worse than before 8 13.3% 18 30.0% 27 49.1% 11 18.3% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.3% 1 1.7% 4 6.8% 47 4.3% before Better than before 29 48.3% 3 5.2% 16 27.1% 3 9.7% 180 16.6% Same as before 22 36.7% 51 86.4% 45 77.6% 25 42.4% 11 35.5% 686 63.4% Worse than before 7 11.7% 8 13.6% 9 15.5% 14 23.7% 17 54.8% 169 15.6% Total 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 58 100.0% 59 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,082 100.0% Please rate the quality of the space of the house- (Enumerator's Observation)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 14 24.1% 28 49.1% 11 18.6% 5 9.3% 4 6.8% 18 29.5% Good 24 41.4% 12 21.1% 34 57.6% 28 51.9% 46 78.0% 30 49.2% Adequate 10 17.2% 10 17.5% 4 6.8% 9 16.7% 8 13.6% 10 16.4% Poor 10 17.2% 7 12.3% 10 16.9% 12 22.2% 1 1.7% 3 4.9% Total 58 100.0% 57 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 11 18.6% 6 11.1% 8 13.3% 12 20.0% Good 37 62.7% 30 55.6% 43 71.7% 22 36.7% Adequate 4 6.8% 8 14.8% 7 11.7% 15 25.0% Poor 7 11.9% 10 18.5% 2 3.3% 11 18.3% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 20 33.9% 5 8.3% 3 5.5% 4 7.3% Good 17 28.8% 24 40.0% 35 63.6% 19 34.5% Adequate 12 20.3% 20 33.3% 9 16.4% 14 25.5% Poor 10 16.9% 11 18.3% 8 14.5% 18 32.7% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 55 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 3 30.0% 13 21.7% 6 10.0% 171 16.5% Good 3 30.0% 22 36.7% 11 18.3% 1 2.9% 438 42.3% Adequate 1 10.0% 53 88.3% 17 28.3% 26 43.3% 15 42.9% 252 24.3% Poor 3 30.0% 7 11.7% 8 13.3% 17 28.3% 19 54.3% 174 16.8% Total 10 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,035 100.0% Please indicate your level of satisfaction with regards to the facilities of the house
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 6 10.0% 3 5.0% 2 3.4% before Better than before 6 10.0% 7 12.3% 3 5.0% 12 23.1% 1 1.7% 6 10.2% Same as before 39 65.0% 44 77.2% 52 86.7% 26 50.0% 48 81.4% 40 67.8% Worse than before 9 15.0% 6 10.5% 2 3.3% 14 26.9% 10 16.9% 11 18.6% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 52 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 1 1.7% before Better than before 4 6.8% 3 5.6% 12 20.0% 10 16.7% Same as before 52 88.1% 45 83.3% 47 78.3% 47 78.3% Worse than before 3 5.1% 6 11.1% 2 3.3% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 8 13.3% 3 5.0% 5 9.1% 2 3.3% before Better than before 24 40.0% 11 18.3% 11 20.0% 6 10.0% Same as before 19 31.7% 32 53.3% 15 27.3% 38 63.3% Worse than before 9 15.0% 14 23.3% 24 43.6% 14 23.3% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 4 6.8% 35 3.2% before Better than before 27 45.0% 4 6.9% 11 18.6% 3 9.7% 161 14.9% Same as before 26 43.3% 16 27.1% 43 74.1% 12 20.3% 9 29.0% 650 60.1% Worse than before 7 11.7% 43 72.9% 11 19.0% 32 54.2% 19 61.3% 236 21.8% Total 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 58 100.0% 59 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,082 100.0%
Please rate the quality of the house's facilities- (Enumerator's Observation)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 18 31.0% 28 49.1% 8 13.3% 6 11.1% 2 3.4% 9 14.8% Good 26 44.8% 20 35.1% 38 63.3% 32 59.3% 35 59.3% 43 70.5% Adequate 8 13.8% 4 7.0% 4 6.7% 7 13.0% 4 6.8% 8 13.1% Poor 6 10.3% 5 8.8% 10 16.7% 9 16.7% 18 30.5% 1 1.6% Total 58 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 22 37.3% 22 40.7% 35 58.3% 13 21.7% Good 31 52.5% 24 44.4% 19 31.7% 29 48.3% Adequate 4 6.8% 3 5.6% 4 6.7% 14 23.3% Poor 2 3.4% 5 9.3% 2 3.3% 4 6.7% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 23 38.3% 6 10.0% 17 30.9% 1 1.8% Good 36 60.0% 31 51.7% 26 47.3% 19 33.3% Adequate 11 18.3% 11 20.0% 21 36.8% Poor 1 1.7% 12 20.0% 1 1.8% 16 28.1% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 57 100.0% Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Excellent 4 6.8% 9 15.0% 5 8.3% 228 21.0% Good 16 27.1% 23 38.3% 15 25.0% 4 11.4% 467 42.9% Adequate 16 27.1% 49 81.7% 14 23.3% 25 41.7% 17 48.6% 224 20.6% Poor 23 39.0% 11 18.3% 14 23.3% 15 25.0% 14 40.0% 169 15.5% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,088 100.0%
How many other families share these toilets with you?(Presently)
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Your own toilets 55 91.7% 53 93.0% 53 88.3% 49 92.5% 59 100.0% 59 96.7% Common toilets Shared toilets 5 8.3% 3 5.3% 7 11.7% 3 5.7% 2 3.3% No toilets 1 1.8% 1 1.9% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 53 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Your own toilets 56 94.9% 38 70.4% 59 98.3% 57 95.0% Common toilets 14 25.9% 1 1.7% 2 3.3% Shared toilets 3 5.1% 2 3.7% 1 1.7% No toilets Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Your own toilets 59 98.3% 56 94.9% 55 100.0% 56 93.3% Common toilets 1 1.7% 3 5.1% 4 6.7% Shared toilets No toilets Total 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Your own toilets 50 87.7% 58 96.7% 51 85.0% 45 75.0% 21 60.0% 989 90.8% Common toilets 3 5.3% 1 1.7% 5 8.3% 13 21.7% 10 28.6% 57 5.2% Shared toilets 1 1.7% 2 3.3% 1 1.7% 4 11.4% 34 3.1% No toilets 4 7.0% 2 3.3% 1 1.7% 9 0.8% Total 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,089 100.0%
Please evaluate the state of the following, post-tsunami: Quality of the water supply
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.4% 1 1.8% before Better than before 2 3.4% 1 1.9% 1 1.6% Same as before 52 88.1% 45 78.9% 58 98.3% 50 96.2% 48 81.4% 53 86.9% Worse than before 3 5.1% 11 19.3% 1 1.7% 1 1.9% 11 18.6% 7 11.5% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 59 100.0% 52 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 3 5.2% 1 1.9% 1 1.7% before Better than before 2 3.4% 1 1.9% 3 5.0% Same as before 53 91.4% 49 94.2% 60 100.0% 50 83.3% Worse than before 1 1.9% 6 10.0% Total 58 100.0% 52 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.4% 1 1.7% before Better than before 27 45.8% 8 14.5% 2 3.3% Same as before 19 32.2% 32 54.2% 20 36.4% 39 65.0% Worse than before 11 18.6% 26 44.1% 27 49.1% 19 31.7% Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 12 1.1% before Better than before 8 13.6% 1 1.7% 16 26.7% 20 36.4% 2 6.5% 94 8.7% Same as before 34 57.6% 35 58.3% 25 41.7% 19 34.5% 27 87.1% 768 71.4% Worse than before 17 28.8% 24 40.0% 18 30.0% 16 29.1% 2 6.5% 201 18.7% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,075 100.0%
Please evaluate the state of the following, post-tsunami: Access to water supply
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.4% 1 1.8% before Better than before 2 3.4% 1 1.7% 1 1.9% 7 11.5% Same as before 52 88.1% 42 73.7% 55 91.7% 49 94.2% 43 72.9% 50 82.0% Worse than before 3 5.1% 14 24.6% 4 6.7% 2 3.8% 16 27.1% 4 6.6% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 52 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 3 5.2% 1 1.9% 1 1.7% before Better than before 3 5.2% 1 1.9% 3 5.0% Same as before 52 89.7% 49 94.2% 60 100.0% 53 88.3% Worse than before 1 1.9% 3 5.0% Total 58 100.0% 52 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.4% 1 1.7% before Better than before 30 50.8% 9 16.4% 4 6.7% Same as before 25 42.4% 40 67.8% 24 43.6% 40 66.7% Worse than before 2 3.4% 18 30.5% 22 40.0% 16 26.7% Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.6% 13 1.2% before Better than before 7 11.9% 3 5.0% 18 32.1% 2 6.5% 91 8.4% Same as before 35 59.3% 38 63.3% 34 56.7% 25 44.6% 21 67.7% 787 73.1% Worse than before 17 28.8% 22 36.7% 23 38.3% 11 19.6% 8 25.8% 186 17.3% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 31 100.0% 1,077 100.0%
Contd., Please evaluate the state of the following, post-tsunami: Roads and Bridges
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 16 26.7% 21 38.9% 17 28.8% Same as before 34 56.7% 56 100.0% 51 86.4% 25 46.3% 41 69.5% 55 91.7% Worse than before 10 16.7% 8 13.6% 8 14.8% 1 1.7% 5 8.3% Total 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.9% before Better than before 18 31.0% 14 25.9% 35 58.3% 28 46.7% Same as before 40 69.0% 29 53.7% 23 38.3% 30 50.0% Worse than before 10 18.5% 2 3.3% 2 3.3% Total 58 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.4% 1 1.7% 4 6.7% before Better than before 18 30.5% 17 28.8% 29 52.7% 34 56.7% Same as before 25 42.4% 34 57.6% 18 32.7% 12 20.0% Worse than before 14 23.7% 7 11.9% 8 14.5% 10 16.7% Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 10 16.7% 18 1.7% before Better than before 28 46.7% 2 3.3% 20 33.3% 28 49.1% 2 6.3% 327 30.2% Same as before 28 46.7% 37 61.7% 25 41.7% 16 28.1% 26 81.3% 605 55.9% Worse than before 4 6.7% 21 35.0% 5 8.3% 13 22.8% 4 12.5% 132 12.2% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 32 100.0% 1,082 100.0%
Please evaluate the state of the following, post-tsunami: Streetlights
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 12 20.0% 18 33.3% 8 13.6% Same as before 45 75.0% 56 100.0% 57 96.6% 27 50.0% 51 86.4% 60 100.0% Worse than before 3 5.0% 2 3.4% 9 16.7% Total 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Matara District DevinuwaraDikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 7 12.1% 8 13.3% 2 3.3% Same as before 51 87.9% 44 84.6% 52 86.7% 58 96.7% Worse than before 8 15.4% Total 58 100.0% 52 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 7 11.7% before Better than before 8 13.6% 9 15.3% 23 41.8% 16 26.7% Same as before 49 83.1% 48 81.4% 20 36.4% 34 56.7% Worse than before 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 12 21.8% 3 5.0% Total 59 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 8 0.7% before Better than before 17 30.4% 1 1.7% 20 35.1% 3 12.0% 152 14.2% Same as before 33 58.9% 26 43.3% 50 84.7% 25 43.9% 21 84.0% 807 75.6% Worse than before 6 10.7% 34 56.7% 8 13.6% 12 21.1% 1 4.0% 101 9.5% Total 56 100.0% 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 25 100.0% 1,068 100.0%
Please evaluate the state of the following, post-tsunami: Drainage systems
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 2 3.3% 6 11.1% 2 3.4% Same as before 43 71.7% 56 100.0% 56 94.9% 34 63.0% 49 83.1% 58 96.7% Worse than before 15 25.0% 3 5.1% 14 25.9% 8 13.6% 2 3.3% Total 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.9% before Better than before 14 25.9% 13 21.7% 16 26.7% Same as before 58 100.0% 29 53.7% 45 75.0% 44 73.3% Worse than before 10 18.5% 2 3.3% Total 58 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 3 5.0% before Better than before 5 8.5% 3 5.2% 16 29.1% 6 10.0% Same as before 52 88.1% 47 81.0% 27 49.1% 47 78.3% Worse than before 1 1.7% 8 13.8% 12 21.8% 4 6.7% Total 59 100.0% 58 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 5 0.5% before Better than before 17 32.7% 2 6.5% 21 36.8% 1 3.6% 124 11.9% Same as before 28 53.8% 24 40.0% 27 87.1% 21 36.8% 20 71.4% 765 73.6% Worse than before 7 13.5% 36 60.0% 2 6.5% 15 26.3% 7 25.0% 146 14.0% Total 52 100.0% 60 100.0% 31 100.0% 57 100.0% 28 100.0% 1,040 100.0% What was your main source of income prior to the Tsunami?
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 25 49.0% 19 41.3% 37 75.5% 10 23.3% 4 9.8% 5 8.8% Agriculture 1 2.0% 1 2.3% 1 2.4% 2 3.5% Merchant 7 13.7% 2 4.3% 4 8.2% 12 27.9% 8 19.5% 21 36.8% Manual Laborer 1 2.0% 2 4.3% 5 11.6% 5 12.2% 1 1.8% Mechanic 2 3.9% 1 2.2% 1 2.0% 1 2.3% 5 12.2% Unemployed 1 2.3% 4 7.0% Other 15 29.4% 22 47.8% 7 14.3% 13 30.2% 18 43.9% 24 42.1% Total 51 100.0% 46 100.0% 49 100.0% 43 100.0% 41 100.0% 57 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 6 16.7% 19 45.2% 5 21.7% 1 4.5% Agriculture 1 2.8% 1 4.3% 1 4.5% Merchant 7 19.4% 2 4.8% 7 30.4% 9 40.9% Manual Laborer 6 16.7% 4 9.5% 1 4.3% 1 4.5% Mechanic 1 2.8% 1 2.4% 3 13.0% Unemployed 1 2.8% 1 2.4% 1 4.3% Other 14 38.9% 15 35.7% 5 21.7% 10 45.5% Total 36 100.0% 42 100.0% 23 100.0% 22 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 18 36.0% 25 43.1% 40 90.9% 26 48.1% Agriculture 2 4.0% 10 17.2% 9 16.7% Merchant 9 18.0% 5 8.6% 1 2.3% 8 14.8% Manual Laborer 13 26.0% 6 10.3% 3 5.6% Mechanic 2 4.0% 1 1.7% 1 1.9% Unemployed 1 2.0% 1 1.9% Other 5 10.0% 11 19.0% 3 6.8% 6 11.1% Total 50 100.0% 58 100.0% 44 100.0% 54 100.0% Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 4 11.1% 8 18.6% 7 18.9% 17 42.5% 8 36.4% 284 35.8% Agriculture 2 5.6% 6 16.2% 2 5.0% 39 4.9% Merchant 9 25.0% 18 41.9% 7 18.9% 12 30.0% 3 13.6% 151 19.0% Manual Laborer 4 11.1% 1 2.3% 3 8.1% 8 36.4% 64 8.1% Mechanic 3 8.3% 22 2.8% Unemployed 4 11.1% 14 1.8% Other 10 27.8% 16 37.2% 14 37.8% 9 22.5% 3 13.6% 220 27.7% Total 36 100.0% 43 100.0% 37 100.0% 40 100.0% 22 100.0% 794 100.0%
Please identify your main source of income at present
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four GravetsHabaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 23 45.1% 18 38.3% 24 49.0% 10 23.3% 3 7.3% 2 3.6% Agriculture 1 2.0% 1 2.3% 1 2.4% 2 3.6% Merchant 5 9.8% 4 8.2% 9 20.9% 8 19.5% 20 35.7% Manual Laborer 2 3.9% 4 8.5% 10 20.4% 5 11.6% 5 12.2% 6 10.7% Mechanic 2 3.9% 1 2.0% 1 2.3% 4 9.8% Unemployed 7 13.7% 3 6.4% 2 4.1% 4 9.3% 7 12.5% Other 11 21.6% 22 46.8% 8 16.3% 13 30.2% 20 48.8% 19 33.9% Total 51 100.0% 47 100.0% 49 100.0% 43 100.0% 41 100.0% 56 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 5 13.9% 18 42.9% 4 16.7% Agriculture 1 2.8% 1 4.8% Merchant 6 16.7% 1 2.4% 9 37.5% 6 28.6% Manual Laborer 5 13.9% 3 7.1% 1 4.2% 1 4.8% Mechanic 1 2.8% 2 4.8% 3 12.5% Unemployed 5 13.9% 4 9.5% 3 14.3% Other 13 36.1% 14 33.3% 7 29.2% 10 47.6% Total 36 100.0% 42 100.0% 24 100.0% 21 100.0% Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 16 32.0% 22 38.6% 39 88.6% 25 46.3% Agriculture 1 2.0% 10 17.5% 8 14.8% Merchant 7 14.0% 5 8.8% 6 11.1% Manual Laborer 15 30.0% 2 3.5% 3 5.6% Mechanic 1 2.0% 3 5.3% 1 1.9% Unemployed 7 14.0% 6 10.5% 4 9.1% 5 9.3% Other 3 6.0% 9 15.8% 1 2.3% 6 11.1% Total 50 100.0% 57 100.0% 44 100.0% 54 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Fishing 2 5.7% 5 11.6% 6 16.7% 14 35.0% 5 22.7% 241 30.5% Agriculture 2 5.7% 4 11.1% 3 7.5% 35 4.4% Merchant 5 14.3% 17 39.5% 3 8.3% 7 17.5% 2 9.1% 120 15.2% Manual Laborer 9 25.7% 3 7.0% 8 22.2% 2 5.0% 11 50.0% 95 12.0% Mechanic 3 8.6% 2 9.1% 24 3.0% Unemployed 9 25.7% 3 7.0% 5 13.9% 6 15.0% 80 10.1% Other 5 14.3% 15 34.9% 10 27.8% 8 20.0% 2 9.1% 196 24.8% Total 35 100.0% 43 100.0% 36 100.0% 40 100.0% 22 100.0% 791 100.0%
Have you received any Livelihood Recovery and Support related assistance either from the Government sector or the Non-Governmental sector? Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 22 43.1% 6 12.5% 6 12.2% 20 45.5% 16 39.0% 6 10.7% No 29 56.9% 42 87.5% 43 87.8% 24 54.5% 25 61.0% 50 89.3% Total 51 100.0% 48 100.0% 49 100.0% 44 100.0% 41 100.0% 56 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 11 30.6% 14 33.3% 7 30.4% 1 4.8% No 25 69.4% 28 66.7% 16 69.6% 20 95.2% Total 36 100.0% 42 100.0% 23 100.0% 21 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 23 46.0% 32 55.2% 23 52.3% 26 48.1% No 27 54.0% 26 44.8% 21 47.7% 28 51.9% Total 50 100.0% 58 100.0% 44 100.0% 54 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes 17 47.2% 4 9.1% 17 44.7% 22 55.0% 12 52.2% 285 35.7% No 19 52.8% 40 90.9% 21 55.3% 18 45.0% 11 47.8% 513 64.3% Total 36 100.0% 44 100.0% 38 100.0% 40 100.0% 23 100.0% 798 100.0%
With regards to the condition of your livelihood, post-tsunami, would you identify it as:
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 2 3.6% before Better than before 5 11.6% 4 10.0% 6 12.5% 5 12.2% 4 10.5% 3 5.4% Same as before 8 18.6% 23 57.5% 25 52.1% 10 24.4% 11 28.9% 20 35.7% Worse than before 30 69.8% 13 32.5% 17 35.4% 26 63.4% 23 60.5% 31 55.4% Total 43 100.0% 40 100.0% 48 100.0% 41 100.0% 38 100.0% 56 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 2 5.6% 3 7.3% 6 30.0% Same as before 15 41.7% 8 19.5% 11 55.0% 8 40.0% Worse than before 19 52.8% 30 73.2% 3 15.0% 12 60.0% Total 36 100.0% 41 100.0% 20 100.0% 20 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 4 7.0% 4 9.1% 4 9.3% before Better than before 2 4.1% 5 8.8% 5 11.4% 12 27.9% Same as before 19 38.8% 14 24.6% 9 20.5% 15 34.9% Worse than before 28 57.1% 34 59.6% 26 59.1% 12 27.9% Total 49 100.0% 57 100.0% 44 100.0% 43 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 2.3% 1 2.5% 16 2.1% before Better than before 8 22.2% 1 2.3% 1 5.3% 72 9.6% Same as before 18 50.0% 7 16.3% 7 18.4% 14 35.0% 1 5.3% 243 32.3% Worse than before 10 27.8% 34 79.1% 31 81.6% 25 62.5% 17 89.5% 421 56.0% Total 36 100.0% 43 100.0% 38 100.0% 40 100.0% 19 100.0% 752 100.0%
Contd., How satisfied are you with the cleanliness of the medical facility
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% before Better than before 13 22.0% 7 12.3% 2 3.3% 27 50.0% 10 16.9% 5 8.5% Same as before 45 76.3% 50 87.7% 58 96.7% 27 50.0% 47 79.7% 53 89.8% Worse than before 1 1.7% 1 1.7% No Response 1 1.7% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 11 20.4% 1 1.7% before Better than before 20 33.9% 9 16.7% 11 18.6% 9 15.0% Same as before 39 66.1% 33 61.1% 48 81.4% 50 83.3% Worse than before No Response 1 1.9% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 18 30.5% before Better than before 5 8.5% 15 25.0% 25 45.5% 23 39.0% Same as before 54 91.5% 44 73.3% 30 54.5% 17 28.8% Worse than before 1 1.7% No Response Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 59 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 39 65.0% 10 16.7% 32 53.3% 113 10.4% before Better than before 19 31.7% 18 30.0% 27 45.0% 1 2.8% 246 22.6% Same as before 2 3.3% 15 25.0% 7 11.7% 1 1.7% 32 88.9% 652 59.9% Worse than before 45 75.0% 24 40.0% 1 2.8% 73 6.7% No Response 1 1.7% 2 5.6% 5 0.5% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,089 100.0%
How satisfied are you with efficiency of treatment received at the medical facility
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 13 22.0% 3 5.3% 27 50.0% 9 15.3% 6 10.2% Same as before 45 76.3% 53 93.0% 60 100.0% 27 50.0% 50 84.7% 53 89.8% Worse than before 1 1.7% 1 1.8% No Response Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% before Better than before 22 37.3% 15 27.8% 3 5.1% 6 10.0% Same as before 37 62.7% 38 70.4% 56 94.9% 53 88.3% Worse than before No Response 1 1.9% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 9 15.3% before Better than before 2 3.4% 5 8.3% 11 20.0% 25 42.4% Same as before 57 96.6% 53 88.3% 43 78.2% 21 35.6% Worse than before 1 1.7% 1 1.8% 3 5.1% No Response 1 1.7% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 59 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 39 65.0% 2 3.3% 11 18.3% 63 5.8% before Better than before 19 31.7% 17 28.3% 34 56.7% 217 19.9% Same as before 2 3.3% 15 25.0% 18 30.0% 12 20.0% 33 91.7% 726 66.7% Worse than before 45 75.0% 23 38.3% 2 3.3% 77 7.1% No Response 1 1.7% 3 8.3% 6 0.6% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,089 100.0%
How satisfied are you with the condition of the physical structure of the medical facility
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% before Better than before 5 8.5% 9 15.8% 25 46.3% 7 12.1% 8 13.6% Same as before 53 89.8% 46 80.7% 59 98.3% 29 53.7% 46 79.3% 50 84.7% Worse than before 1 1.7% 1 1.8% 5 8.6% No Response 1 1.8% 1 1.7% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 58 100.0% 59 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 11 18.6% 13 24.1% 1 1.7% before Better than before 33 55.9% 18 33.3% 12 20.3% 4 6.7% Same as before 15 25.4% 22 40.7% 46 78.0% 55 91.7% Worse than before 1 1.7% No Response 1 1.9% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 6 10.2% before Better than before 4 6.8% 13 21.7% 24 43.6% 28 47.5% Same as before 55 93.2% 47 78.3% 30 54.5% 22 37.3% Worse than before 1 1.8% 2 3.4% No Response 1 1.7% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 59 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 48 80.0% 30 50.0% 110 10.1% before Better than before 11 18.3% 5 8.3% 30 50.0% 5 13.9% 241 22.2% Same as before 1 1.7% 15 25.0% 11 18.3% 28 77.8% 630 57.9% Worse than before 45 75.0% 43 71.7% 1 2.8% 100 9.2% No Response 1 1.7% 2 5.6% 7 0.6% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,088 100.0%
Contd., How satisfied are you with the quantity of the teaching staff
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 2.6% before Better than before 1 3.4% 10 26.3% 7 30.4% 2 9.1% 3 11.1% Same as before 28 96.6% 25 65.8% 26 100.0% 13 56.5% 20 90.9% 21 77.8% Worse than before 2 5.3% 3 13.0% 3 11.1% Total 29 100.0% 38 100.0% 26 100.0% 23 100.0% 22 100.0% 27 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 1 3.2% 5 20.0% 2 7.7% Same as before 30 96.8% 20 80.0% 32 97.0% 24 92.3% Worse than before 1 3.0% Total 31 100.0% 25 100.0% 33 100.0% 26 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 6 16.2% before Better than before 1 4.2% 16 50.0% 17 54.8% 18 48.6% Same as before 23 95.8% 8 25.0% 14 45.2% 9 24.3% Worse than before 8 25.0% 4 10.8% Total 24 100.0% 32 100.0% 31 100.0% 37 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 8 25.8% 6 18.2% 21 3.7% before Better than before 22 71.0% 10 30.3% 18 40.0% 9 56.3% 142 25.2% Same as before 1 3.2% 30 85.7% 16 48.5% 25 55.6% 7 43.8% 372 66.0% Worse than before 5 14.3% 1 3.0% 2 4.4% 29 5.1% Total 31 100.0% 35 100.0% 33 100.0% 45 100.0% 16 100.0% 564 100.0%
How satisfied are you with the space to room all students
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 9 23.7% 2 7.1% before Better than before 9 23.7% 4 15.4% 7 30.4% 4 18.2% 9 32.1% Same as before 29 100.0% 20 52.6% 22 84.6% 11 47.8% 16 72.7% 17 60.7% Worse than before 5 21.7% 2 9.1% Total 29 100.0% 38 100.0% 26 100.0% 23 100.0% 22 100.0% 28 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 3.2% 1 3.8% before Better than before 11 35.5% 19 76.0% 12 36.4% 5 19.2% Same as before 14 45.2% 6 24.0% 20 60.6% 19 73.1% Worse than before 5 16.1% 1 3.0% 1 3.8% Total 31 100.0% 25 100.0% 33 100.0% 26 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 4.2% 2 6.5% 6 16.2% before Better than before 2 8.3% 24 75.0% 19 61.3% 21 56.8% Same as before 21 87.5% 7 21.9% 10 32.3% 10 27.0% Worse than before 1 3.1% Total 24 100.0% 32 100.0% 31 100.0% 37 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 7 22.6% 1 2.9% 7 21.9% 5 11.1% 42 7.4% before Better than before 23 74.2% 7 20.0% 16 50.0% 16 35.6% 9 56.3% 217 38.5% Same as before 12 34.3% 6 18.8% 22 48.9% 7 43.8% 269 47.7% Worse than before 1 3.2% 15 42.9% 3 9.4% 2 4.4% 36 6.4% Total 31 100.0% 35 100.0% 32 100.0% 45 100.0% 16 100.0% 564 100.0%
As of today, which of the following organisations consulted you/ received your input, in the design and execution of the rehabilitation operations
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa GOVT Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 2 3.3% 16 26.7% 3 5.6% 4 6.8% 2 3.3% extent Yes but only some 34 56.7% 7 12.3% 8 13.3% 28 51.9% 24 40.7% 20 32.8% extent No we were never 24 40.0% 50 87.7% 32 53.3% 22 40.7% 30 50.8% 38 62.3% consulted No Response 4 6.7% 1 1.9% 1 1.7% 1 1.6% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama GOVT Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 6 10.2% 1 1.9% 2 3.4% extent Yes but only some 44 74.6% 8 14.8% 33 55.9% 13 22.0% extent No we were never 8 13.6% 45 83.3% 21 35.6% 44 74.6% consulted No Response 1 1.7% 3 5.1% 2 3.4% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama GOVT Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 19 32.2% 2 3.3% 2 3.6% 6 10.0% extent Yes but only some 29 49.2% 38 63.3% 33 60.0% 21 35.0% extent No we were never 11 18.6% 20 33.3% 20 36.4% 33 55.0% consulted No Response Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total GOVT Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 11 31.4% 51 86.4% 1 2.1% 6 11.8% 134 12.8% extent Yes but only some 3 8.6% 7 11.9% 26 54.2% 15 29.4% 5 14.3% 396 37.9% extent No we were never 21 60.0% 1 1.7% 18 37.5% 30 58.8% 29 82.9% 497 47.6% consulted No Response 3 6.3% 1 2.9% 17 1.6% Total 35 100.0% 59 100.0% 48 100.0% 51 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,044 100.0%
Contd., Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa NGOs Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 10 16.7% 1 1.8% 11 18.3% 3 5.6% 2 3.4% 2 3.3% extent Yes but only some 28 46.7% 14 24.6% 8 13.3% 24 44.4% 20 33.9% 19 31.1% extent No we were never 22 36.7% 42 73.7% 37 61.7% 26 48.1% 36 61.0% 39 63.9% consulted No Response 4 6.7% 1 1.9% 1 1.7% 1 1.6% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama NGOs Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 1 1.7% 1 1.9% 7 11.9% extent Yes but only some 42 71.2% 8 14.8% 18 30.5% 3 5.0% extent No we were never 15 25.4% 45 83.3% 31 52.5% 55 91.7% consulted No Response 1 1.7% 3 5.1% 2 3.3% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama NGOs Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 25 42.4% 27 45.0% 29 52.7% 17 28.3% extent Yes but only some 26 44.1% 24 40.0% 11 20.0% 22 36.7% extent No we were never 8 13.6% 9 15.0% 15 27.3% 21 35.0% consulted No Response Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total NGOs Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 1 2.9% 8 13.8% 4 8.3% 4 8.0% 153 14.7% extent Yes but only some 3 8.6% 50 86.2% 29 60.4% 17 34.0% 5 14.3% 371 35.6% extent No we were never 31 88.6% 8 16.7% 29 58.0% 29 82.9% 498 47.7% consulted No Response 7 14.6% 1 2.9% 21 2.0% Total 35 100.0% 58 100.0% 48 100.0% 50 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,043 100.0%
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa TERNATIONAL AGENC Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 11 18.3% 6 10.0% 3 5.6% 1 1.6% extent Yes but only some 28 46.7% 1 1.8% 7 11.7% 18 33.3% 13 22.0% 11 18.0% extent No we were never 21 35.0% 56 98.2% 43 71.7% 32 59.3% 45 76.3% 48 78.7% consulted No Response 4 6.7% 1 1.9% 1 1.7% 1 1.6% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama TERNATIONAL AGENC Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 1 1.9% 1 1.7% extent Yes but only some 28 48.3% 8 14.8% 2 3.4% 4 6.7% extent No we were never 28 48.3% 45 83.3% 54 91.5% 53 88.3% consulted No Response 2 3.4% 3 5.1% 2 3.3% Total 58 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama TERNATIONAL AGENC Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 27 45.8% 23 38.3% 25 45.5% 13 21.7% extent Yes but only some 15 25.4% 17 28.3% 2 3.6% 15 25.0% extent No we were never 17 28.8% 20 33.3% 27 49.1% 32 53.3% consulted No Response 1 1.8% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total TERNATIONAL AGENC Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 4 8.0% 115 11.7% extent Yes but only some 1 2.9% 9 18.8% 15 30.0% 5 14.3% 199 20.2% extent No we were never 34 97.1% 26 54.2% 30 60.0% 29 82.9% 640 65.0% consulted No Response 13 27.1% 1 2.0% 1 2.9% 30 3.0% Total 35 100.0% 48 100.0% 50 100.0% 35 100.0% 984 100.0%
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa POLITICIANS Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 1 1.7% 1 1.9% extent Yes but only some 10 16.7% 7 11.7% 10 18.5% 12 20.3% extent No we were never 50 83.3% 57 100.0% 49 81.7% 42 77.8% 46 78.0% 60 98.4% consulted No Response 3 5.0% 1 1.9% 1 1.7% 1 1.6% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 61 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama POLITICIANS Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 1 1.9% extent Yes but only some 28 49.1% 8 14.8% 5 8.5% 5 8.5% extent No we were never 28 49.1% 45 83.3% 51 86.4% 52 88.1% consulted No Response 1 1.8% 3 5.1% 2 3.4% Total 57 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama POLITICIANS Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 10 18.2% extent Yes but only some 2 3.4% 9 15.0% 3 5.5% 7 11.7% extent No we were never 57 96.6% 51 85.0% 40 72.7% 43 71.7% consulted No Response 2 3.6% 10 16.7% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total POLITICIANS Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 3 8.6% 16 1.6% extent Yes but only some 2 5.7% 1 2.1% 4 8.0% 5 14.3% 118 12.0% extent No we were never 30 85.7% 36 75.0% 39 78.0% 29 82.9% 805 82.0% consulted No Response 11 22.9% 7 14.0% 1 2.9% 43 4.4% Total 35 100.0% 48 100.0% 50 100.0% 35 100.0% 982 100.0%
Contd., Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa LIGIOUS ORGANISATIO Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 2 3.3% 1 2.1% extent Yes but only some 25 41.7% 4 6.7% 16 33.3% 14 23.7% extent No we were never 35 58.3% 57 100.0% 49 81.7% 29 60.4% 44 74.6% 59 98.3% consulted No Response 5 8.3% 2 4.2% 1 1.7% 1 1.7% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 48 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama LIGIOUS ORGANISATIO Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 1 1.9% extent Yes but only some 27 47.4% 8 14.8% 5 8.5% 9 15.3% extent No we were never 25 43.9% 45 83.3% 51 86.4% 48 81.4% consulted No Response 5 8.8% 3 5.1% 2 3.4% Total 57 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama LIGIOUS ORGANISATIO Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 2 3.4% 7 11.7% 1 1.8% 1 1.7% extent Yes but only some 12 20.3% 17 28.3% 9 16.4% 9 15.0% extent No we were never 45 76.3% 34 56.7% 38 69.1% 38 63.3% consulted No Response 2 3.3% 7 12.7% 12 20.0% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total LIGIOUS ORGANISATIO Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Yes to a fairly large 4 11.4% 18 37.5% 1 2.0% 38 3.9% extent Yes but only some 2 5.7% 4 8.3% 15 30.0% 5 14.3% 181 18.6% extent No we were never 29 82.9% 13 27.1% 31 62.0% 29 82.9% 699 71.7% consulted No Response 13 27.1% 3 6.0% 1 2.9% 57 5.8% Total 35 100.0% 48 100.0% 50 100.0% 35 100.0% 975 100.0%
To what extent are you satisfied with the role played / services provided by the following institutions / persons in terms of assisting you to rebuild your life? Gramaseva Niladhari Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 5 8.5% 24 42.1% 19 32.8% 4 7.7% 5 8.6% 8 13.8% Somewhat Satisfied 36 61.0% 27 47.4% 21 36.2% 31 59.6% 35 60.3% 29 50.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 10 16.9% 2 3.5% 9 15.5% 11 21.2% 9 15.5% 9 15.5%
Very Dissatisfied 8 13.6% 4 7.0% 9 15.5% 6 11.5% 9 15.5% 12 20.7% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 58 100.0% 52 100.0% 58 100.0% 58 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 8 14.3% 11 20.8% 6 10.0% 7 11.7% Somewhat Satisfied 23 41.1% 10 18.9% 35 58.3% 29 48.3% Somewhat Dissatisfied 16 28.6% 14 26.4% 8 13.3% 12 20.0%
Very Dissatisfied 9 16.1% 18 34.0% 11 18.3% 12 20.0% Total 56 100.0% 53 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 32 53.3% 10 17.2% 4 7.3% 14 23.3% Somewhat Satisfied 22 36.7% 15 25.9% 27 49.1% 12 20.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 5 8.3% 18 31.0% 13 23.6% 20 33.3%
Very Dissatisfied 1 1.7% 15 25.9% 11 20.0% 14 23.3% Total 60 100.0% 58 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai MuslimNinthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 14 23.7% 31 51.7% 30 50.0% 10 17.2% 1 3.0% 243 22.6% Somewhat Satisfied 29 49.2% 19 31.7% 17 28.3% 31 53.4% 10 30.3% 458 42.6% Somewhat Dissatisfied 6 10.2% 3 5.0% 12 20.0% 10 17.2% 6 18.2% 193 18.0%
Very Dissatisfied 10 16.9% 7 11.7% 1 1.7% 7 12.1% 16 48.5% 180 16.8% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 58 100.0% 33 100.0% 1,074 100.0%
To what extent are you satisfied with the role played / services provided by the following institutions / persons in terms of assisting you to rebuild your life? Office of the Divisional Secretary Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 4 6.7% 6 11.8% 15 26.3% 2 3.8% 3 5.6% 6 10.5% Somewhat Satisfied 33 55.0% 36 70.6% 23 40.4% 33 63.5% 33 61.1% 31 54.4% Somewhat Dissatisfied 18 30.0% 5 9.8% 12 21.1% 8 15.4% 9 16.7% 10 17.5%
Very Dissatisfied 5 8.3% 4 7.8% 7 12.3% 9 17.3% 9 16.7% 10 17.5% Total 60 100.0% 51 100.0% 57 100.0% 52 100.0% 54 100.0% 57 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 9 21.4% 6 14.6% 8 14.0% 4 8.5% Somewhat Satisfied 13 31.0% 21 51.2% 42 73.7% 30 63.8% Somewhat Dissatisfied 14 33.3% 8 19.5% 7 12.3% 9 19.1%
Very Dissatisfied 6 14.3% 6 14.6% 4 8.5% Total 42 100.0% 41 100.0% 57 100.0% 47 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 27 45.0% 7 11.9% 10 18.2% 10 16.7% Somewhat Satisfied 28 46.7% 25 42.4% 29 52.7% 9 15.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 5 8.3% 21 35.6% 8 14.5% 28 46.7%
Very Dissatisfied 6 10.2% 8 14.5% 13 21.7% Total 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 13 22.8% 2 3.3% 19 33.9% 12 20.0% 163 16.1% Somewhat Satisfied 33 57.9% 49 81.7% 31 55.4% 38 63.3% 6 23.1% 543 53.7% Somewhat Dissatisfied 5 8.8% 6 10.0% 6 10.7% 6 10.0% 7 26.9% 192 19.0%
Very Dissatisfied 6 10.5% 3 5.0% 4 6.7% 13 50.0% 113 11.2% Total 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 60 100.0% 26 100.0% 1,011 100.0%
Contd., To what extent are you satisfied with the role played / services provided by the following institutions / persons in terms of assisting you to rebuild your life? Armed Forces Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 27 57.4% 9 30.0% 4 10.8% 9 17.3% 18 39.1% Somewhat Satisfied 22 100.0% 16 34.0% 18 60.0% 30 81.1% 32 61.5% 23 50.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 1 2.1% 1 3.3% 1 2.7% 4 7.7% 1 2.2%
Very Dissatisfied 3 6.4% 2 6.7% 2 5.4% 7 13.5% 4 8.7% Total 22 100.0% 47 100.0% 30 100.0% 37 100.0% 52 100.0% 46 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 2 6.5% 13 56.5% 16 28.1% 27 50.9% Somewhat Satisfied 26 83.9% 9 39.1% 39 68.4% 26 49.1% Somewhat Dissatisfied 2 6.5% 1 4.3% 2 3.5%
Very Dissatisfied 1 3.2% Total 31 100.0% 23 100.0% 57 100.0% 53 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 16 35.6% 44 77.2% 31 70.5% 47 83.9% Somewhat Satisfied 20 44.4% 9 15.8% 8 18.2% 8 14.3% Somewhat Dissatisfied 6 13.3% 3 5.3% 5 11.4% 1 1.8%
Very Dissatisfied 3 6.7% 1 1.8% Total 45 100.0% 57 100.0% 44 100.0% 56 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 6 13.6% 1 2.6% 5 11.1% 1 11.1% 276 35.5% Somewhat Satisfied 35 79.5% 34 89.5% 30 66.7% 22 52.4% 6 66.7% 413 53.1% Somewhat Dissatisfied 8 17.8% 16 38.1% 1 11.1% 53 6.8%
Very Dissatisfied 3 6.8% 3 7.9% 2 4.4% 4 9.5% 1 11.1% 36 4.6% Total 44 100.0% 38 100.0% 45 100.0% 42 100.0% 9 100.0% 778 100.0%
To what extent are you satisfied with the role played / services provided by the following institutions / persons in terms of assisting you to rebuild your life? NGOs/INGOs
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 12 20.3% 20 38.5% 15 27.3% 6 11.8% 4 7.8% 17 29.8% Somewhat Satisfied 36 61.0% 26 50.0% 25 45.5% 33 64.7% 35 68.6% 30 52.6% Somewhat Dissatisfied 7 11.9% 4 7.7% 5 9.1% 6 11.8% 3 5.9% 4 7.0%
Very Dissatisfied 4 6.8% 2 3.8% 10 18.2% 6 11.8% 9 17.6% 6 10.5% Total 59 100.0% 52 100.0% 55 100.0% 51 100.0% 51 100.0% 57 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara DikwellaMatara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 2.9% 7 25.9% 11 20.8% 5 13.2% Somewhat Satisfied 19 55.9% 18 66.7% 35 66.0% 24 63.2% Somewhat Dissatisfied 8 23.5% 1 3.7% 4 7.5% 6 15.8%
Very Dissatisfied 6 17.6% 1 3.7% 3 5.7% 3 7.9% Total 34 100.0% 27 100.0% 53 100.0% 38 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama
Very Satisfied 46 76.7% 42 71.2% 38 70.4% 47 81.0% Somewhat Satisfied 12 20.0% 14 23.7% 15 27.8% 6 10.3% Somewhat Dissatisfied 2 3.3% 3 5.1% 1 1.9% 3 5.2%
Very Dissatisfied 23 Total 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 58 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total
Very Satisfied 5 8.6% 1 1.7% 3 5.1% 11 18.3% 3 15.8% Somewhat Satisfied 44 75.9% 46 76.7% 44 74.6% 35 58.3% 10 52.6% Somewhat Dissatisfied 6 10.3% 3 5.0% 5 8.5% 9 15.0% 4 21.1%
Very Dissatisfied 3 5.2% 10 16.7% 7 11.9% 5 8.3% 2 10.5% Total 58 100.0% 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 19 100.0%
With regards to any issues you have encountered, how satisfied are you with the efficiency of their resolution?
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very satisfied 7 12.3% 6 10.0% 1 1.8% 4 6.8% Satisfied 27 45.8% 19 33.3% 30 50.0% 19 35.8% 20 35.7% 24 40.7% Neither satisfied nor 8 13.6% 17 29.8% 12 20.0% 17 32.1% 14 25.0% 17 28.8% dissatisfied Dissatisfied 24 40.7% 14 24.6% 12 20.0% 17 32.1% 21 37.5% 14 23.7% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0% 53 100.0% 56 100.0% 59 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very satisfied 6 10.2% 4 8.5% 5 8.5% 4 7.3% Satisfied 30 50.8% 16 34.0% 39 66.1% 19 34.5% Neither satisfied nor 6 10.2% 2 4.3% 6 10.2% 15 27.3% dissatisfied Dissatisfied 17 28.8% 25 53.2% 9 15.3% 17 30.9% Total 59 100.0% 47 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very satisfied 7 11.7% 3 5.0% 2 3.6% 4 6.7% Satisfied 26 43.3% 14 23.3% 15 27.3% 17 28.3% Neither satisfied nor 19 31.7% 15 25.0% 14 25.5% 9 15.0% dissatisfied Dissatisfied 8 13.3% 28 46.7% 24 43.6% 30 50.0% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very satisfied 1 1.7% 54 5.1% Satisfied 27 46.6% 1 1.7% 41 69.5% 16 28.6% 1 2.9% 401 37.6% Neither satisfied nor 31 53.4% 13 21.7% 10 16.9% 20 35.7% 18 51.4% 263 24.6% dissatisfied Dissatisfied 46 76.7% 7 11.9% 20 35.7% 16 45.7% 349 32.7% Total 58 100.0% 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 56 100.0% 35 100.0% 1,067 100.0%
Contd., Please evaluate the different aspects of reconstruction & rehabilitation measures by using the grid below Beneficiary Consultation Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 6.7% 1 1.8% 3 5.8% Somewhat Satisfied 17 29.8% 10 28.6% 15 33.3% 17 33.3% 15 26.8% 32 61.5% Somewhat Dissatisfied 28 49.1% 13 37.1% 19 42.2% 29 56.9% 28 50.0% 9 17.3%
Very Dissatisfied 12 21.1% 12 34.3% 8 17.8% 5 9.8% 12 21.4% 8 15.4% Total 57 100.0% 35 100.0% 45 100.0% 51 100.0% 56 100.0% 52 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 5.2% 2 3.5% 1 1.9% Somewhat Satisfied 12 20.7% 5 9.6% 37 64.9% 20 38.5% Somewhat Dissatisfied 39 67.2% 19 36.5% 9 15.8% 20 38.5%
Very Dissatisfied 4 6.9% 28 53.8% 9 15.8% 11 21.2% Total 58 100.0% 52 100.0% 57 100.0% 52 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 5.0% 1 1.8% 1 1.7% Somewhat Satisfied 28 46.7% 19 33.9% 15 27.3% 15 25.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 23 38.3% 21 37.5% 15 27.3% 22 36.7%
Very Dissatisfied 6 10.0% 15 26.8% 25 45.5% 22 36.7% Total 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 2.0% 3 5.5% 2 4.2% 24 2.4% Somewhat Satisfied 34 69.4% 1 1.7% 41 74.5% 20 41.7% 4 14.8% 357 36.2% Somewhat Dissatisfied 9 18.4% 3 5.0% 11 20.0% 23 47.9% 15 55.6% 355 36.0%
Very Dissatisfied 5 10.2% 56 93.3% 3 6.3% 8 29.6% 249 25.3% Total 49 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 48 100.0% 27 100.0% 985 100.0%
Ease of receiving benefits Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 4 7.7% 3 5.7% 2 3.5% 4 6.7% Somewhat Satisfied 14 24.1% 25 48.1% 22 41.5% 13 25.0% 26 45.6% 35 58.3% Somewhat Dissatisfied 32 55.2% 16 30.8% 18 34.0% 32 61.5% 18 31.6% 13 21.7%
Very Dissatisfied 12 20.7% 7 13.5% 10 18.9% 7 13.5% 11 19.3% 8 13.3% Total 58 100.0% 52 100.0% 53 100.0% 52 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 2 3.5% 12 23.1% 6 10.5% 11 18.3% Somewhat Satisfied 16 28.1% 16 30.8% 39 68.4% 39 65.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 23 40.4% 18 34.6% 8 14.0% 4 6.7%
Very Dissatisfied 16 28.1% 6 11.5% 4 7.0% 6 10.0% Total 57 100.0% 52 100.0% 57 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 5.0% 1 1.8% 5 9.1% 3 5.0% Somewhat Satisfied 27 45.0% 21 36.8% 17 30.9% 25 41.7% Somewhat Dissatisfied 26 43.3% 20 35.1% 21 38.2% 17 28.3%
Very Dissatisfied 4 6.7% 15 26.3% 12 21.8% 15 25.0% Total 60 100.0% 57 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 2.0% 1 1.8% 1 2.0% 59 5.7% Somewhat Satisfied 33 67.3% 1 1.7% 28 50.0% 21 42.0% 4 13.8% 422 40.8% Somewhat Dissatisfied 10 20.4% 7 11.7% 25 44.6% 23 46.0% 16 55.2% 347 33.6%
Very Dissatisfied 5 10.2% 52 86.7% 2 3.6% 5 10.0% 9 31.0% 206 19.9% Total 49 100.0% 60 100.0% 56 100.0% 50 100.0% 29 100.0% 1,034 100.0%
Complaint redress mechanisms
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 2.9% 1 3.2% 1 1.9% 3 7.0% Somewhat Satisfied 12 21.4% 16 47.1% 9 29.0% 15 29.4% 19 36.5% 21 48.8% Somewhat Dissatisfied 32 57.1% 10 29.4% 16 51.6% 32 62.7% 23 44.2% 7 16.3%
Very Dissatisfied 12 21.4% 7 20.6% 5 16.1% 4 7.8% 9 17.3% 12 27.9% Total 56 100.0% 34 100.0% 31 100.0% 51 100.0% 52 100.0% 43 100.0%
Contd., Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 1.7% 3 6.4% 2 3.4% 2 3.7% Somewhat Satisfied 15 25.9% 12 25.5% 26 44.1% 27 50.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 29 50.0% 15 31.9% 24 40.7% 17 31.5%
Very Dissatisfied 13 22.4% 17 36.2% 7 11.9% 8 14.8% Total 58 100.0% 47 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 5.7% 1 1.8% 1 1.9% Somewhat Satisfied 20 37.7% 10 18.2% 11 20.4% 7 13.2% Somewhat Dissatisfied 25 47.2% 26 47.3% 22 40.7% 24 45.3%
Very Dissatisfied 5 9.4% 18 32.7% 20 37.0% 22 41.5% Total 53 100.0% 55 100.0% 54 100.0% 53 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 6.1% 5 9.3% 3 6.0% 30 3.2% Somewhat Satisfied 30 61.2% 2 3.4% 32 59.3% 19 38.0% 3 11.5% 306 32.6% Somewhat Dissatisfied 10 20.4% 6 10.2% 17 31.5% 25 50.0% 13 50.0% 373 39.8%
Very Dissatisfied 6 12.2% 51 86.4% 3 6.0% 10 38.5% 229 24.4% Total 49 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 50 100.0% 26 100.0% 938 100.0%
Contd., Overall satisfaction
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 2.0% 6 10.9% 3 5.2% 3 5.2% Somewhat Satisfied 23 40.4% 36 72.0% 25 45.5% 20 41.7% 25 43.1% 38 65.5% Somewhat Dissatisfied 23 40.4% 11 22.0% 15 27.3% 21 43.8% 19 32.8% 11 19.0%
Very Dissatisfied 11 19.3% 2 4.0% 9 16.4% 7 14.6% 11 19.0% 6 10.3% Total 57 100.0% 50 100.0% 55 100.0% 48 100.0% 58 100.0% 58 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 1.7% 3 5.6% 6 10.0% 5 8.3% Somewhat Satisfied 12 20.7% 13 24.1% 32 53.3% 32 53.3% Somewhat Dissatisfied 40 69.0% 29 53.7% 15 25.0% 13 21.7%
Very Dissatisfied 5 8.6% 9 16.7% 7 11.7% 10 16.7% Total 58 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 3 5.0% 4 6.8% 5 9.1% 1 1.7% Somewhat Satisfied 35 58.3% 18 30.5% 19 34.5% 21 35.0% Somewhat Dissatisfied 21 35.0% 22 37.3% 15 27.3% 24 40.0%
Very Dissatisfied 1 1.7% 15 25.4% 16 29.1% 14 23.3% Total 60 100.0% 59 100.0% 55 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Satisfied 1 1.8% 2 4.1% 44 4.3% Somewhat Satisfied 31 63.3% 4 6.8% 33 58.9% 20 40.8% 4 13.8% 441 42.6% Somewhat Dissatisfied 11 22.4% 6 10.2% 22 39.3% 23 46.9% 15 51.7% 356 34.4%
Very Dissatisfied 7 14.3% 49 83.1% 4 8.2% 10 34.5% 193 18.7% Total 49 100.0% 59 100.0% 56 100.0% 49 100.0% 29 100.0% 1,034 100.0%
Overall, how would you evaluate your current lifestyle with that which you previously led?
Galle District Ambalangoda Balapitiya Bentota Galle Four Gravets Habaraduwa Hikkaduwa Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 4 6.8% 2 3.7% 3 5.0% before Better than before 6 10.2% 5 8.8% 10 16.9% 5 9.3% 5 8.5% 3 5.0% Same as before 14 23.7% 28 49.1% 30 50.8% 18 33.3% 26 44.1% 22 36.7% Worse than before 39 66.1% 24 42.1% 15 25.4% 29 53.7% 28 47.5% 32 53.3% Total 59 100.0% 57 100.0% 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 59 100.0% 60 100.0%
Matara District Devinuwara Dikwella Matara Four Gravets Weligama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than before Better than before 9 15.3% 2 3.7% 13 21.7% 4 6.7% Same as before 30 50.8% 21 38.9% 41 68.3% 29 48.3% Worse than before 20 33.9% 31 57.4% 6 10.0% 27 45.0% Total 59 100.0% 54 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0%
Contd., Hambantota District Ambalantota Hambantota Tangalle Tissamaharama Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 4 6.7% 8 14.5% 6 10.2% before Better than before 3 5.0% 5 8.3% 6 10.9% 13 22.0% Same as before 26 43.3% 15 25.0% 13 23.6% 22 37.3% Worse than before 31 51.7% 36 60.0% 28 50.9% 18 30.5% Total 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 55 100.0% 59 100.0%
Ampara District Trincomalee District Akkaraipattu Kalmunai Muslim Ninthavur Kinniya Town & Gravets Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Much better than 1 1.7% 1 1.7% 29 2.7% before Better than before 1 1.7% 1 1.7% 6 10.0% 5 8.3% 2 5.6% 104 9.5% Same as before 41 69.5% 3 5.0% 14 23.3% 20 33.3% 4 11.1% 417 38.3% Worse than before 17 28.8% 55 91.7% 40 66.7% 34 56.7% 30 83.3% 540 49.5% Total 59 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 60 100.0% 36 100.0% 1,090 100.0%
BENEFICIARY SURVEY ON TSUNAMI RECOVERY PROCESS CONDUCTED BY SOCIAL INDICATOR 105, FIFTH LANE, COLOMBO 03
TP: 0112 370473 FAX: 0112 370475
SERIAL NO: HOUSEHOLD NO:
INTERVIEWER: NAME OF INTERVIEWER:
I here by certify that all information provided here is true and accurate and has been obtained from the respondent as instructed.
______Signature of Interviewer
INTERVIEWER: ALL STATEMENTS IN BOLD LETTERING ARE INSTRUCTIONS FOR YOU AND SHOULD NOT BE READ OUT TO THE RESPONDENT.
Good morning /afternoon/ evening. My name is ______and I represent Social Indicator, a research organisation that conducts independent research on social issues. We are currently trying to understand people’s experiences with the Tsunami recovery process. Your responses and suggestions will be treated confidentially and will be used only for the purpose of finding out your experiences and noting your suggestions for improvement. Could I please talk to you as a member of this family in this regard?
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 1 of 18 Section 1
1 Respondent’s Name ______
Name & Code of District, Village District 2 (To be noted separately by the supervisor) Village
3 Interviewed by ______
4 Name of Supervisor
5 Date of Interview
Spot Checked 1. Yes By: ______6 2. No
Back Checked 1. Yes By: ______7 2. No (Go to 9)
8 Date back checked on
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 2 of 18 9 Scrutinized By: ______
10 Date scrutinized on
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 3 of 18 SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE HOUSEHOLD
Please answer the following with regards to the composition of your household:
Number of members of your household: ______
HOUSING
1. How badly was your house damaged due to the Tsunami? 1. Partially 2. Completely
2. Approximately how far was your house from the coastal line? ______
3. What kind of support did you receive to rebuild/repair this house?
A B C D Types of Support From whom did you No of installments No of visits made How much receive it? received? to receive the monetary expense benefit? did you incur while receiving the total benefit? 1. Aid (Rs.250,000)
2. Aid (Rs.100,000)
3. Raw materials for building 4. Other
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 4 of 18 4. Please identify the following with regards to the ownership of your house:
Before Tsunami After Tsunami 1. Rented 1. Rented 2. Own, with deed 2. Own, with deed 3. Own without deed 3. Own, without deed
5. Does this housing have adequate space for all members of your household? 1. Yes 2. No
6. Please identify the following with regards to your housing:
Before Tsunami After Tsunami 1. Wall 1.Wooden 1.Wooden 2. Mud Hut 2. Mud Hut 3. Cement/Tiled 3. Cement/Tiled 4. Other (Specify) 4. Other (Specify) 2. Space Area sq feet ______Area sq feet ______
3. Facilities 1. Electricity 1. Electricity 2. Piped Water supply 2. Piped Water supply
7. Please indicate your levels of satisfaction with regards to the following:
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very No Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Response 1 2 3 4 99 1. Time taken to receive the 1 2 3 4 99 house 2. Quality of the house 1 2 3 4 99 3. Space 1 2 3 4 99 4. Location 1 2 3 4 99
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 5 of 18 SANITATION
8. Do you use: Presently Before Tsunami 1. Your own toilets 1. Your own toilets (go to 12) 2. Common toilets 2. Common toilets
09. How many other families share these toilets with you? ______
10. How satisfied are you with the following: Very Somewhat Somewhat Very No Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Response 1 2 3 4 99 1. Hygienic conditions of the toilets 1 2 3 4 99 2.Condition of the physical 99 structure 1 2 3 4 3. Water supply 1 2 3 4 99 4. Distance to toilet 1 2 3 4 99
11. If own toilets used presently, who built it? 1. Received with house 2. Built own structure 3. Other (Specify) ______
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 6 of 18 GENERAL AMENITIES
12. Please identify your source for drinking water:
A B Before Tsunami Now 1. Piped water at your house 1. Piped water at your house 2. Common pipe 2. Common pipe 3. Public well 3. Public well 4. Public water tank 4. Public water tank 5. Public hand pump 5. Public hand pump 6. Private hand pump 6. Private hand pump 7. Private well 7. Private well
13. Please identify your source of water for other purposes:
A B Before Tsunami Now 1. Piped water at your house 1. Piped water at your house 2. Common pipe 2. Common pipe 3. Public well 3. Public well 4. Public water tank 4. Public water tank 5. Public hand pump 5. Public hand pump 6. Private hand pump 6. Private hand pump 7. Private well 7. Private well
14. Have you had any issues with these water supplies? Please identify?
A B Before Tsunami Presently 1. Water unclean/unfit for use 1. Water unclean/unfit for use 2. Technical difficulty (for e.g. 2. Technical difficulty (for e.g. low water pressure) low water pressure)
3. Source at inconvenient 3. Source at inconvenient distance distance 4. Other (Specify) 4. Other (Specify)
5. No problem 5. No problem
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 7 of 18 15. How does your current household equipment compare with that of your previous lifestyle? 1. Better than before 2. Same as before 3. Worse than before
16. Please identify your level of satisfaction with regards to the following:
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very No Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Response 1 2 3 4 99 1. Quality of the water 1 2 3 4 99 supply 2. Access to water supply 1 2 3 4 99 3. Availability of your 1 2 3 4 99 general amenities.
17. With regards to the following, please identify how conditions have changed with post-tsunami:
Worse than Same as Better than Much No before before before better than Response 1 2 3 before 99 4 1. Roads and bridges 1 2 3 4 99 2. Streetlights 1 2 3 4 99 3. Drainage systems 1 2 3 4 99
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 8 of 18 LIVELIHOOD AND ECONOMIC SECURITY
18. Was your livelihood affected by the Tsunami? 1. Yes 2. No (Skip to Q 28)
19. What was your main source of income prior to the Tsunami? (One answer only) 1. Fishing 2. Agriculture 3. Merchant 4. Manual Laborer 5. Mechanic 6. Unemployed 7. Other
20. Please identify your main source of income at present. (One answer only) 1. Fishing 2. Agriculture 3. Merchant 4. Manual Laborer 5. Mechanic 6. Unemployed 7. Other
21. Have you received any Livelihood Recovery and Support related assistance either from the Government sector or the Non-Governmental sector?
1. Yes 2. No
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 9 of 18 22. If yes, can you identify the kinds of support you have received for livelihood recovery?
Type of aid A B From whom did you Estimated receive it? monetary value of aid?
1. Financial Assistance
2. Livelihood Assets (boats, bicycles, sewing machines etc.) 3. Vocational Training
4. Agricultural support (seeds, fertilizers etc.) 5. Other
23. Did you face any problems while receiving this support?
1. Yes 2. No
24. What was the nature of these problems? ______
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 10 of 18 25. How satisfied are you with the:
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Not Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Applicable 1 2 3 4 99 1. Efficiency of the processes involved in 1 2 3 4 99 restoring your trade/livelihood? 2. Monetary assistance received for 1 2 3 4 99 livelihood recovery 3. Quality of the assets 1 2 3 4 99 received 4. Quantity of the assets 1 2 3 4 99 received
MEDICAL / HEALTH
26. Do you or your family members still visit the same medical facility that you frequented before the tsunami? 1. Yes 2. No
27. Is this facility private or government? 1. Private 2. Government
28. If a government facility, was it damaged in any way due to the tsunami? 1. Yes 2. No
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 11 of 18
29. How satisfied are you with:
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very No Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Response 1 2 3 4 99 1. Cleanliness of the medical 1 2 3 4 99 facility 2. Efficiency of treatment received 1 2 3 4 99 3. Availability of the medical staff 1 2 3 4 99 4. Condition of the physical 1 2 3 4 99 structure
EDUCATION
30. Do you have individuals in your household who are of school going age?
1. Yes 2. No (Go to Question number 36 )
31. Have they had to change schools as a result of the tsunami? 1. Yes 2. No 3. Not applicable (Began schooling after tsunami)
32. If same school, was the building greatly damaged due to the tsunami? 1. Yes 2. No
33. If same school, has the distance to the school been greatly affected by tsunami displacement? 1. Yes 2. No
34. What mode of transport is used to go to the school? 1. Travel on foot 2. Public transport (bus, train etc) 3. Own vehicle Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 12 of 18
35. How satisfied are you with:
Very Somewhat Somewhat Not Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied sure/Don’t 1 Dissatisfied 2 3 know 4 99 1. Quality of the teaching staff 1 2 3 4 99 2. Quantity of teaching staff 1 2 3 4 99 3. Space to room all students 1 2 3 4 99 4. Condition of the physical 99 structure 1 2 3 4 5. Distance to school 1 2 3 4 99
OVERALL EVALUATIONS:
36. AS OF TODAY, which of the following organisations consulted you/ received your input, in the design and execution of the rehabilitation operations? 1. Yes, to a fairly large extentok 2. Yes, but only to some extent 3. No, we were never consulted 99. No response
Organisation Option 1 Government 2 NGOs 3 International Agencies 4 Political parties / Political representatives 5 Religious organisations
37. Was the option of emotional support, such as counseling etc, made available to you? 1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t know/unsure
38. Was there a systematic process of obtaining information regarding your entitlement? 1. Yes 2. No
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 13 of 18 3. Not sure/ Don’t know.
39. If yes, how satisfied were you with this system? 1. Very satisfied 2. Somewhat satisfied 3. Somewhat dissatisfied 4. Very dissatisfied
40. Since you received this aid, have there been any follow up mechanisms to ensure the continued quality of your life? 1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure
41. Have you ever had a grievance related to this aid/welfare? 1. Yes 2. No
42. If yes, did you make a complaint about it? 1. Yes 2. No 43. If yes, to whom? ______
44. If no, why? 1. Didn’t know who to complain to 2. There is no point in complaining 3. There is no one to complain to.
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 14 of 18 45. To what extent are you satisfied with the role played / services provided by the following institutions / persons in terms of assisting you to rebuild your life?
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very No
Institutions / Persons Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Response 1 2 3 4 99 1. Gramaseva Niladhari 1 2 3 4 99 2. Officials of PS/MC/UC* 1 2 3 4 99
3. Office of Divisional Secretary 1 2 3 4 99 4. Members of Parliament 1 2 3 4 99
5. Samurdhi Niladhari 1 2 3 4 99
6. NGOs/INGOs 1 2 3 4 99
7. Armed Forces 1 2 3 4 99
8. Religious Organisations 1 2 3 4 99
9. Business Community 1 2 3 4 99
10.Other ______1 2 3 4 99
46. With regards to any issues you have encountered, how satisfied are you with the efficiency of their resolution? 1. Very satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4. Dissatisfied
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 15 of 18 47. Please evaluate the different aspects of reconstruction & rehabilitation measures by using the grid below.
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very No Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Response 1 2 3 4 99 1. Beneficiary Consultation 1 2 3 4 99 2. Ease of receiving benefits 1 2 3 4 99 3. Complaint redress mechanisms 1 2 3 4 99 4 Overall satisfaction 1 2 3 4 99
48. Overall, do you feel that your current lifestyle matches that which you previously led? 1. I currently live a better lifestyle 2. Yes, it does match my previous lifestyle 3. It matches my previous lifestyle to some extent 4. It does not match my lifestyle at all.
Follow up questions: (To be filled by enumerator)
49. How far is the householder’s current residence from the shore? ______
50. Please rate the quality of the physical structure of the residence:
Excellent Good Adequate Poor Material Space (area sq feet) Facilities (light, water) Finishing of wall Finishing of floor Finishing of roof
51. Please rate the physical quality of the householder’s toilet facility: 1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Adequate 4. Bad
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 16 of 18 DEMOGRAPHICS
1. Sex: 1. Male 2. Female
2. Religion: 1. Buddhism 2. Hinduism 3. Islam 4. Roman Catholicism 5. Christianity (Non-RC) 6.Other ______
3. Age: ______
4. Ethnicity: 1. Sinhala 2. Tamil 3. Up-country Tamil 4. Muslim 5. Burgher 6. Other ______
5. First language: 1. Sinhala 2. Tamil 3. English 4. Other ______
6. Main occupation of the respondent (SINGLE ANSWER ONLY) ______
7. Could you please tell me your educational qualifications? (SINGLE CODE ONLY)
1. Cannot read and write 8. Advanced Level 2. Literate but no formal education 9. Vocationally trained 3. Up to grade 5 10. Technically trained 4. Grade 6-9 11. Professional 5. Up to O’ Level 12. Undergraduate 6. O’ Level 13. Graduate and above 7. Up to Advanced Level
8. Total monthly income of the household: ______
9. No of members in the household? ______
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 17 of 18
1. RESPONDENT’S NAME:
2. ADDRESS: 3. TEL NO:
4. PROVINCE 5. DISTRICT:
6. ELECTORATE:
7. POLLING STATION:
8. TYPE OF AREA: 1. Rural 2. Urban
9. DATE: 10. START TIME: 11. END TIME:
Thank you very much for your time!
Copyright©Social Indicator, Feb 2007 Page 18 of 18