DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of Verbal Behavior 1998, 15, 143-147

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of Verbal Behavior 1998, 15, 143-147 The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 1998, 15, 143-147 Realizing the Potential of Skinner's Analysis of Verbal Behavior Mark L. Sundberg Behavior Analysts, Inc. The most significant aspects of human ists have examined this issue, and have col- behavior involve verbal behavior (e.g., lan- lectively provided a list of reasons why Ver- guage, thinking, understanding, memory). bal Behavior was not immediately embraced Perhaps this significance is why Skinner fre- by the behavioral community (e.g., quently stated that his analysis of verbal be- Eshleman, 1991; McPherson, Bonem, Green, havior would prove to be his most important & Osborne, 1984; Michael, 1984; Oah & work (e.g., 1978, p. 122). The topics analyzed Dickinson, 1989; Vargas, 1986). Perhaps in Skinner's book Verbal Behavior (1957) are most troublesome to the behavior analysts complex, but these are many of the same of the time was that the book was specula- topics that are focused on extensively in tive and did not contain any data (Michael, mainstream psychology and linguistics. If 1984). The lack of empirical research on ver- behavior analysts are to participate in the bal behavior continued to trouble behavior analysis of these complex behaviors, then analysts well into the 1980s (McPherson et they will need the conceptual tools from Ver- al., 1984). However, it now appears that this bal Behavior in order to maintain the integ- situation has changed, and a number of ad- rity of a behavioral analysis. Although much vances in empirical research and applica- has been accomplished in the 41 years since tions directly related to Verbal Behavior can the publication of Verbal Behavior, there are be identified. These advances are classified still several major challenges that face be- into six different areas, each of which will havior analysts if the book is to have the be briefly reviewed below. impact that Skinner felt it could. The current Empirical research. In a citation analysis of paper will briefly review some of these ac- Verbal Behavior (1957), McPherson et al. complishments and then suggest some fu- (1984) found that of the 836 papers that met ture directions for the analysis of verbal their citation criteria, only 19 constituted behavior. empirical research. These authors concluded that "Verbal Behavior has not Current Status of an Operant provided a con- Analysis of Verbal Behavior ception that has led to the empirical exami- nation and explanation of verbal behavior. Following the publication of Verbal Behav- If the past is a predictor of the future there ior (1957), Skinner received a wave of nega- is no reason to expect that it will eventually tive reactions from both outside and inside do so" (p. 165). However, there has been a the field of behavior analysis. Criticism of steady increase in verbal behavior research the book was anticipated from outside the since the late 1970s (if convention presenta- field (Skinner, 1978), but the strong reaction tions are considered), and published empiri- from within the field was probably not cal research has been increasing at a expected by Skinner. A number of behavior- celeration rate of x 3 since the mid 1980s (Eshleman, 1991). The author gratefully acknowledges Cindy Sundberg A review of the 126 papers published in for her comments on earlier versions of this paper. Reprints can be obtained from the author at 888 the first 14 volumes of The Analysis of Verbal Podva Rd., Danville, California 94526. Behavior (TAVB) showed that 46 papers con- 143 144 MARK L. SUNDBERG stituted experimental analyses. Also, a num- Inc., Danville, California). There have also ber of other empirical papers have been pub- been a number of other applications of Ver- lished in the Journal of the Experimental bal Behavior. For example, Skinner's work Analysis ofBehavior and the Journal ofApplied has been used to analyze the acquisition of Behavior Analysis (e.g., Lamarre & Holland, language by children (e.g., Bijou & Baer, 1985; Lodhi & Greer, 1989; Partington, 1965), the acquisition of language by apes Sundberg, Newhouse, & Spengler, 1994; (e.g., Savage-Rumbaugh, 1984; Sundberg, Yamamoto & Mochizuki, 1988), as well as 1996), schizophrenic hallucinations (e.g., other journals and books (e.g., Fushimi, Burns, Heiby, & Tharp, 1983; Layng & 1994; Luciano, 1986; Sato & Sugiyama, Andronis, 1984), facilitated communication 1994; Sigafoos, Doss, & Reichle, 1989). In (e.g., Hall, 1993; Sundberg, 1993), and stimu- addition, several reviews of verbal behavior lus equivalence (e.g., Hall & Chase, 1991). research have been published (e.g., Brady, Conference presentations. The number of Saunders, & Spradlin, 1994-1995; Oah conference presentations relevant to verbal & Dickinson, 1989; Potter & Brown, 1997; behavior has also been substantial over the Shafer, 1994-1995). Given these data, it seems past 20 years. The verbal behavior area has reasonable to speculate that a citation analy- always been a key part of the Association sis conducted today would show that for Behavior Analysis (ABA) program, and Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior has in fact was the first specialty area tracked finally led to a productive line of empirical separately by the Midwestern ABA program investigation. committee (1977). The frequency of present- Availability ofteaching materials. Prior to the ers using the terms from Verbal Behavior mid 1970s there were very few teaching (1957) also appears to be increasing. In an materials on verbal behavior available to awards ceremony at a recent regional con- college instructors. However, during the ference on behavior analysis, Julie Vargas past 20 years materials have become more stated that she was impressed with the num- available due to a number of factors, but ber of different presenters at the conference perhaps most significant is the availability who made accurate use of the terms from of the papers published in TAVB and other Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior. journals and books. In addition, updated The Verbal Behavior Special Interest Group objectives, exams, and study materials for (VBSIG) and TAVB. The VBSIG has been one Skinner's book are available (Michael, 1997), of the largest SIGs in ABA for the past 20 as are a number of books and book chapters years. Its membership has reached approxi- on verbal behavior (e.g., Chase & Parrott, mately 500, and it has successfully started 1986; Donahoe & Palmer, 1994; Hayes, and maintained a professional journal Hayes, Sato, & Ono, 1994; Pierce & Epling, (TAVB). The SIG continues to meet each year 1995). at the annual ABA convention, and 15 vol- Applications. Perhaps the most obvious umes of the journal have been published. value of the research on verbal behavior thus Signs of acceptance from outside the field. In far has been the role it has played in guid- a recent publication in Historiographia ing language assessment and training pro- Linguistica (1990), a historian of linguistics, -grams for individuals who have language J. T. Andresen, suggested that Verbal Behav- deficits (Michael, 1998). Examples of these ior (1957) could be of value to those inter- applications can be found throughout TAVB ested in pragmatics. Andresen provided a and the other publications mentioned above. reexaminatation of several aspects of the In addition, a number of schools with cur- Skinner-Chomsky debate and concluded ricula based on Verbal Behavior (1957) have that Skinner was inappropriately excluded been established for children with autism from the field of linguistics. Andresen as- and other developmental disabilities (e.g., serted that "writing Skinner into the record ABC School, Sacramento, California; F. S. changes the history of what we think our Keller School, New York, New York; Insti- discipline to be and thereby reconfigures the tute for Effective Education, San Diego, Cali- disciplinary boundaries" (1990, p. 155). fornia; STARS School/Behavior Analysts, Andresen was invited to the 1991 ABA con- THE POTENTIAL OF VERBAL BEHAVIOR 145 vention for the President's Invited Sympo- behavior is limited, and often there is no sium and provided further encouragement room for additional courses in established to those interested in advancing Skinner's degree programs (Michael, 1980). However, analysis of verbal behavior. Another ex- if students do not receive training on verbal ample of acceptance from outside the field behavior while in college, the probability is has come from the work of Moerk (1992), quite low that they will ever receive the who has also suggested that Skinner's analy- training that is necessary and sufficient to sis of verbal behavior has much to offer the understand and use the analysis. New be- field of linguistics. Moerk has attended sev- havior analysts must be given this training, eral ABA and ABA-affiliate conventions. because those who have had formal train- Future Directions for the Operant ing and have contributed to this area dur- Analysis of Verbal ing the past 41 years are becoming fewer Behavior each year. The advancements in these six areas seem The need to include verbal behavior in behav- to collectively suggest that Skinner's analy- ioral textbooks. Many of the current textbooks sis of verbal behavior is alive and well. How- on behavior modification and behavior ever, despite these advances, there remains analysis contain little or no mention of ver- an obvious neglect of verbal behavior in bal behavior. Those that do often fail to in- mainstream behavior analysis and behav- corporate the analysis into other sections of ioral language research. In addition, there the book, as if it is something aside from a is a marked absence of college instruction behavioral analysis that should only be con- on verbal behavior, and much of the current sidered separately. instructional material on behavior analysis The need to incorporate verbal behavior into in general does not include a treatment of applied and basic research. The analysis of ver- verbal behavior. These issues are discussed bal behavior is rarely used in the language in more detail below.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VERBAL BEHAVIOR by B. F. Skinner William James Lectures Harvard
    VERBAL BEHAVIOR by B. F. Skinner William James Lectures Harvard University 1948 To be published by Harvard University Press. Reproduced by permission of B. F. Skinner† Preface In 1930, the Harvard departments of psychology and philosophy began sponsoring an endowed lecture series in honor of William James and continued to do so at irregular intervals for nearly 60 years. By the time Skinner was invited to give the lectures in 1947, the prestige of the engagement had been established by such illustrious speakers as John Dewey, Wolfgang Köhler, Edward Thorndike, and Bertrand Russell, and there can be no doubt that Skinner was aware that his reputation would rest upon his performance. His lectures were evidently effective, for he was soon invited to join the faculty at Harvard, where he was to remain for the rest of his career. The text of those lectures, possibly somewhat edited and modified by Skinner after their delivery, was preserved as an unpublished manuscript, dated 1948, and is reproduced here. Skinner worked on his analysis of verbal behavior for 23 years, from 1934, when Alfred North Whitehead announced his doubt that behaviorism could account for verbal behavior, to 1957, when the book Verbal Behavior was finally published, but there are two extant documents that reveal intermediate stages of his analysis. In the first decade of this period, Skinner taught several courses on language, literature, and behavior at Clark University, the University of Minnesota, and elsewhere. According to his autobiography, he used notes from these classes as the foundation for a class he taught on verbal behavior in the summer of 1947 at Columbia University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Verbal Behavior in the Analysis of the Therapeutic Process1
    Conductual, International Journal of Interbehaviorism and Behavior Analysis Montaño-Fidalgo, M., Martínez-Sánchez, H., Froján-Parga, M.X. and Calero-Elvira, A. The role of verbal behavior in the analysis of the therapeutic process1 Montserrat Montaño Fidalgo2,3 Centro de Psicología Álava Reyes, Spain Héctor Martínez Sánchez Universidad de Guadalajara, México María Xesús Froján Parga Ana Calero Elvira Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain Abstract Over the last 50 years, the variables established by B. F. Skinner in his work, Verbal Behavior (Skinner, 1957), have been taken into account in both empirical and theoretical research. Although historically the initial impact of Skinner's work was lower than expected, even in the areas most closely related to verbal behavior (e.g., naming, equivalence classes, rule-governed behavior), only recently have efforts focused on the analysis of verbal behavior in the context of the therapeutic process and clinical change. This paper highlights the crucial role of verbal behavior in the clinical setting by maintaining operant terminology and drawing attention specifically to the analysis of the therapist’s verbal behavior during sessions. In addition, it analyzes the role of verbal behavior in the form of instructional control and rule-governed behavior in the client-therapist interaction. The article concludes that questions regarding the status, function and variables that influence the verbal behavior generated in therapy sessions cannot yet be answered clearly and remain key objects of study. Key words: verbal behavior, clinical setting, client-therapist interaction, rule-governed behavior, instructional control, behavioral therapy Resumen Desde que Skinner publicara hace ya más de 50 años su famosa obra Verbal Behavior (Skinner, 1957), ha sido mucha la investigación empírica y teórica que ha tomado en consideración variables relacionadas con la conducta verbal.
    [Show full text]
  • Can SMART Training Really Increase Intelligence? a Replication Study
    J Behav Educ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9302-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Can SMART Training Really Increase Intelligence? A Replication Study Dylan Colbert1 · Ian Tyndall2 · Bryan Roche1 · Sarah Cassidy1 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract A burgeoning research stream supports the efcacy of a novel behavior- analytic intervention, known as SMART training, in raising general intelligence by training a set of crucial cognitive skills, referred to as relational skills. A sample of Irish secondary school students (n = 26) was divided into two IQ matched groups, with the experimental group receiving 12 weeks of SMART training delivered in bi-weekly 45-min sessions. WASI IQ assessments were administered at baseline and follow-up to all participants by blind testers. For each of the three WASI IQ indices and the four IQ subtests, signifcant follow-up rises were found for the experimental group only. Analyses of variance indicated a signifcant efect of training on Verbal IQ, Matrix Reasoning and Vocabulary scores. Results lend further support for the efcacy of the SMART training program in enhancing intellectual skills. Keywords Strengthening mental abilities with relational training · Relational frame theory · Derived relational responding · Intelligence · Educational intervention Introduction Training interventions designed to improve intellectual function have been devel- oped within many diferent perspectives and across numerous disciplines, including behavioral psychology (Cohen et al. 2006; Eikeseth et al. 2002; Lovaas 1987; Rem- ington et al. 2007), cognitive psychology (Au et al. 2015; Buschkuehl et al. 2008; * Dylan Colbert [email protected] 1 Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ontogenetic Selection of Verbal Capabilities: Contributions of Skinner’S Verbal Behavior Theory to a More Comprehensive Understanding of Language R
    International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 2008, 8, 3, 363-386 The Ontogenetic Selection of Verbal Capabilities: Contributions of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior Theory to a More Comprehensive Understanding of Language R. Douglas Greer Columbia University, USA ABSTRACT I describe how Skinner’s (1957) Verbal Behavior and subsequent research that extended his theory contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of language with regard to the ontogenetic selection of verbal behavior. A large corpus of research has shown the applied utility of the theory for inducing verbal behavior in children missing certain verbal capabilities and developmental cusps. Other related work on Relational Frame theory, Naming theory, and Stimulus Equivalence provided the basis for identifying verbal developmental cusps and capabilities. Evidence on the initial independence of the speaker and listener, and research identifying the experiences that lead to the joining of the speaker and listener within the skin, suggests an empirically based theory of verbal development. This work identifies the preverbal foundations, the speaker and listener components and the experiences that lead to the capability for learning language incidentally and productive language. The growing evidence on the ontogenetic sources of language and its development in children complements the work of other scholarship in language and provides neuroscience with better tools to validate the relation between brain activity and the effects of experience. Keywords: ontogenetic selection of verbal capabilities, higher order verbal operants, verbal development, speaker-as-own-listener. RESUMEN Se describe cómo Conducta Verbal de Skinner (1957) y la investigación relacionada con- tribuyen a una aproximación más integradora del lenguaje basada en la selección ontogenética del comportamiento verbal.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbal Behavior
    Instructor: Marc N. Branch Email address: [email protected] Phone: 273-2173 Office hours: Wednesday, 3rd period, and by appointment. Requirements; Ground rules; Format Readings: The amount of reading will vary from week to week. The number of pages is not large by graduate- student standards, but many of the readings are difficult; most could benefit from a second reading. There are two required texts: Skinner, B. F. (1957/1991). Verbal behavior. (VB) Copley Publishing Group. Winokur, S. (1976) A primer of verbal behavior (PVB). Prentice Hall You are likely already to have a copy of VB, but if you do not you may order a copy from http://www.bfskinner.org /BFSkinner/Bookstore.html ($20). Winokur’s book is out of print, so copies have been made and are available at Target copy in the Butler Plaza ($18). There will be recommended additional reading. Many should be available through ordinary web connections. Those that are not will be on electronic reserve and therefore retrievable at https://ares.uflib.ufl.edu/ Class format: The readings will provide the basis for our weekly class discussions, so I expect them to be read carefully and on time. In an effort to make the most of our time together we will try out a number of different discussion formats over the course of the semester. You should come to class prepared to discuss (not just summarize) this material. Our discussion goal will be that everyone has a clear understanding of the concepts presented. Each week the initial discussion will be on the primary, required reading assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • B. F. Skinner's Analysis of Verbal Behavior: a Chronicle
    ISSN 1982-3541 Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil 2007, Vol. IX, nº 2, 21-38 B. F. Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior: a chronicle Ernst A. Vargas Julie S. Vargas B. F. Skinner Foundation Terry J. Knapp University of Nevada, Las Vegas Abstract A time line of Skinner’s work on verbal behavior must start at the very beginning of his scientific career. Skinner laid down the conceptual framework of his Theory of Behavior as early as his thesis. He developed his experimental work within this framework, and depended on research results to adjust and modify his theory. At the same time, he initiated efforts to interpret verbal behavior within his theoretical formulations and upon the operant relations he discovered in the laboratory. Work on both mediated and nonmediated relations entwined throughout his career. He discovered the basic verbal relations slowly and inductively over a twenty-five year span of effort. Key words: Skinner, Verbal behavior, History, Theory. Introduction ior derived from an experimental analysis of a more rigorous sort” (Skinner, 957, p. ). Skinner’s writing of Verbal Behavior From the beginning, it was an effort about took place over many years, in many settings, which he was quite explicit as he stated in a and with continuous revisions. More impor- letter to Fred Keller, “What I am doing is ap- tantly, it took place within the implicit frame- plying the concepts I’ve worked out experi- work of his theory of behavior, primarily mentally to this non-experimental (but Em- based on the process of behavioral selection. pirical) field” (Skinner, July 2, 1934).
    [Show full text]
  • On Chomsky's Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior
    On Chomsky's Review of Skinner’s VERBAL BEHAVIOR Kenneth MacCorquodale University of Minnesota S kinner's book, Verbal Behavior, was published in 1957. Chomsky's review of it appeared in 1959. By the criterion of seminal influence in generating controversy and stimulating publication, both must be counted major successes, although the reputation and influence of the review are more widely acknowledged. It has been reprinted at least three times (The Bobbs-Merrill Reprint Series in the Social Sciences, No. A-34; Fodor and Katz, 1964; Jakobovits and Miron, 1967), and Chomsky has recently written (in Jakobovits and Miron, 1967, p. 142) that he would take back little of it if he were rewriting it now. Skinner's Verbal Behavior is an analysis of speech in terms of its “controlling relations” which include the speaker’s current motivational state, his current stimulus circumstances, his past reinforcements, and his genetic constitution. Skinner has accepted the constraints of natural science in his basic analytical apparatus in that all of its terms are empirically definable. He intends to account only for the objective dimensions of verbal behavior and to invoke only objective, nonmentalistic and nonhypothetical entities to account for it. The notion of control, anathema to the politically oversensitive, means only “causation” in its purely functional sense, and need not alarm. It is not arguable nor criticizable that behavior is an orderly, controlled datum, sensitive to the circumstances of the behaver; this is simply a fact which has been amply confirmed. Contents: . Introduction . Criticism 1: Verbal Behavior is an untested hypothesis which has, therefore, no claim upon our credibility .
    [Show full text]
  • Verbal Aversive Control in Clinical Interaction
    Nerea Galván Domínguez, Jesús Alonso Vega, and María Xesús Froxán Parga Psicothema 2020, Vol. 32, No. 2, 182-188 ISSN 0214 - 9915 CODEN PSOTEG Copyright © 2020 Psicothema doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.171 www.psicothema.com Verbal aversive control in clinical interaction Nerea Galván Domínguez, Jesús Alonso Vega, and María Xesús Froxán Parga Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Abstract Resumen Background: Aversive control techniques involve aversive stimuli to Control verbal aversivo en la interacción clínica. Antecedentes: el generate behavioral change. The purpose of this work is to analyze the use término control aversivo se refi ere a las situaciones en las que se genera of verbal aversive control by psychologists during the clinical interaction, un cambio conductual mediante el uso de estímulos que provocan algún combining respondent and operant explanations. Method: Observational tipo de malestar. En este trabajo analizamos el uso de verbalizaciones methodology is used to analyze 26 session recordings of three different aversivas por parte del terapeuta durante la interacción clínica, cases of anxiety disorder, relationship problem and low mood problem combinando explicaciones pavlovianas y operantes. Método: mediante (27h 32’) carried out by two psychologists of the Therapeutic Institute metodología observacional se analizaron 26 grabaciones de tres casos de of Madrid. The variables considered were psychologists’ aversive and ansiedad, problemas de pareja y bajo estado de ánimo (27h 32’) tratados non-aversive verbalizations and clients’ antitherapeutic verbalizations. por dos terapeutas del Instituto Terapéutico de Madrid. Las variables Results: There is a strong relationship between clients’ antitherapeutic consideradas fueron las verbalizaciones aversivas y no aversivas del verbalizations and psychologist’s aversive verbalizations, both potential terapeuta y las verbalizaciones antiterapéuticas del cliente.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech and Language Assessment: a Verbal Behavior Analysis
    SLP- ABA Volume 5, Issue No. 2 Speech and language assessment: A verbal behavior analysis Barbara E. Esch, Kate B. LaLonde, and John W. Esch Abstract Speech-language assessments typically describe deficits according to form (topography), without identifying the environmental variables responsible for the occurrence (function) of a particular utterance. We analyze a database of 28 standardized speech-language assessments according to six response classes including five of Skinner’s (1957) verbal operants. We discuss the importance of including a functional analysis of speech-language skills to better inform treatment planning and target selection. Recommendations for future research are included. Keywords: speech-language, assessment, verbal behavior, functional analysis, verbal operant ____________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction As practitioners concerned with treating speech-language disorders, one of our primary goals is to accurately and efficiently determine which communication skills should be targeted for intervention. How do we know when something needs to be taught? What defines a skill deficit or a communication breakdown ? In everyday terms, a speech-language problem is signaled when a breakdown occurs in the interaction between a speaker and a listener. That is, we say that communication is successful when the outcome of an interaction is effective (i.e., functional), but when the interaction is weak and ineffective, we suspect a deficit in the repertoire of one of the communication partners. Thus, the critical aspect that defines communicative competence lies in the success of the dyad, a dynamic process comprised of functional units of discourse between a speaker and a listener, even when these roles are assumed within a single individual (e.g., Lodhi & Greer, 1989; Palmer, 1998; Skinner, 1957).
    [Show full text]
  • SKINNER's VERBAL BEHAVIOR 289 of the Study of Verbal Behavior Began with Greenspoon’S (1955) Study of Plural Nouns
    International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 2008, 8, 3, 287-294 Skinner’s Verbal Behavior Kurt Salzinger1 Hofstra University, USA ABSTRACT The author reviews the book that B. F. Skinner considered to be his most important work, namely Verbal Behavior in terms of its content and effect on the field. He considers such elements as the paucity of experiments, the host of allusions to literature and the masterful behavior analysis directed at elucidating verbal behavior, the latter constituting an admi- rable example of how behavior analysis can be applied to other forms of behavior as well. Keywords: Skinner, verbal behavior, conditioning of verbal behavior, tact, mand, autoclitic, Chomsky. RESUMEN El autor revisa el libro que B.F. Skinner consideraba su obra más importante, Conducta Verbal, con respecto a su contenido y a su efecto sobre el campo de estudio. En ello toma en consideración elementos del libro tales como la escasez de experimentos, la multitud de alusiones a la literatura, y el magistral análisis conductual dirigido a elucidar el com- portamiento verbal. Este último elemento constituye un ejemplo admirable de cómo el análisis conductual puede ser también aplicado a otras formas de comportamiento. Palabras clave: Skinner, conducta verbal, condicionamiento de la conducta verbal, tacto, mando, autoclítico, Chomsky. The book that B. F. Skinner considered to be his most important work (Salzinger, 1990), namely Verbal Behavior continues to be both unexamined and much maligned and therefore basically misunderstood.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relation Between Radical Behaviorism and the Science of Verbal Behavior Sam Leigland Gonzaga University
    The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 1989, 7, 25-41 On the Relation Between Radical Behaviorism and the Science of Verbal Behavior Sam Leigland Gonzaga University A fully-developed "science of verbal behavior" may depend upon a recognition of the implica- tions of Skinner's scientific system, radical behaviorism, particularly as it relates to the nature of scientific research. An examination of the system and Skinner's own research practices imply, for example, that samples of vocal or written verbal behavior collected under controlling condi- tions may be observed as directly for the effects of controlling contingencies as in the traditional practice involving cumulative response records. Such practices may be defended on the basis of the pragmatic epistemology which characterizes radical behaviorism. An example of one type of exploratory method is described. In a number of places in the writings of philosophy," and what have such issues to B. F. Skinner, reference is made to a "science do with the analysis of verbal behavior? of verbal behavior" (e.g., Skinner, 1957). The To take a radical behaviorist view, reference appears to have been made first in "philosophy" is not regarded as some ration- Skinner's (1945) landmark paper on opera- alistic exercise which somehow stands apart tionism. This paper also marks what appears from ongoing human behavior and its to be Skinner's first published reference to products, but rather is a term which "radical behaviorism;' the scientific system describes certain verbal practices within a which has been
    [Show full text]
  • B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior: an Introduction
    ISSN 1982-3541 Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil 2007, Vol. IX, nº 2, 1-20 B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: an Introduction Ernst A. Vargas B. F. Skinner Foundation Abstract Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior requires understanding its experimental and philosophical underpinnings. His interpretation of the social behavior known as “language” builds directly from the experimental analysis of behavior in direct contact with its immediate milieu, both inner and outer, and from the framing of behavioral contact as contingency relations. The analysis of the contingency relations of verbal behavior, however, deals with properties of behavior not only under the dynamic controls of direct contact, but as that control is mediated by society. A social community constructs that mediation by shaping its members’ actions to teach other members how to verbalize effectively through the proper forms of action. As such, Skinner’s attributes of verbal behavior are: 1) relational; 2) mediational; 3) communal; and 4; stipulational. All four are necessary components of his analysis of verbal behavior, and constitute what he defines as verbal behavior. Key-words: Verbal behavior, Relational, Mediational, Communal, Stipulational Overture ner had rejected such an inadequate formula- tion. Asked if he had read that review, it was In Verbal Behavior, Skinner states that not a surprise that Skinner answered that he a proper introduction for understanding his had started to do so, read a few paragraphs, book is to first read Science and Human Be- and quit when he saw that it had missed the havior. Quite so. Without understanding the point. A rather polite response, considering.
    [Show full text]