DOCSLIB.ORG

Turtles All the Way Down

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turtles All the Way Down TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN Prerequisites To Personal Genius John Grinder Judith DeLozier Grinder & Associates ACKNOV We wish to acknowledge to the other C.E. Asherbranner Suzanne Bailey Nancy Beplat Jean Blair Larry Burnett Published by Georgene Burton Grinder & Associates Britt Burton Cosette P.O. Box 67295 Scotts Valley, CA 95067 Carter Consuelo Casula Susan Master Distributor Connors Peggy Metamorphous Advanced Product Services P.O. Dean Carmel Box 10616 Portland, OR 97210-0616 Decroos Skip Ellis Carole Ellison All rights reserved. No part of this book Rosalie Fedoruk may be utilized in any form or by any Judy Francis Francis means, electronic or mechanical, including Friedman Sherrie photocopying, recording, or by any Funk John Funk information storage and retrieval system, Amber Goldstein without permission in writing from the authors. George Greenberg Sharon Grimm Copyright © 1987 by John Grinder and Thomas Grinder Judith DeLozier Editorial and Art Direction Allan Harris by Lori Stephens Printed in the United Christian Hart States of America Poppy Hawkins Jack Grinder, John. Hawley Turtles all the way down : prerequisites to personal genius / John Grinder, Judith DeLozier. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-55552-022-7 : $22.95 1. Neurolinguistic programming. I. DeLozier, Judith. II. Title. BF637.N46G75 1994 158'.9—dc20 94-32322 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to acknowledge to following people: the participants-the other end of the loop: C.E. Asherbranner Suzanne Bailey Phil Herman Kirk Nancy Beplat Jean Hughes Murray Blair Larry Burnett Johannsen Janece Kline Georgene Burton Bob Kurtz Britt Burton Cosette Phyllis Murray Linhart Carter Consuelo Catherine Long Kari Lyn Casula Susan Jerry Mader Stephanie Connors Peggy Mader Thomas Malloy Dean Carmel Susan Marcus Diane Decroos Skip Ellis Marshall Robert Carole Ellison McDonald Philip Milroy Rosalie Fedoruk Pauline Monson Jane Judy Francis Monteleone Patricia Francis Friedman Moore Marshall Sherrie Funk John Nechtow David Pounds Funk Amber Del Powell Alan Power Goldstein George Vera Reichenfeld-Tay Greenberg Sharon Jose Rodnguez Marne Grimm Thomas Ryan Antonio Santos Grinder Allan Steven Silverman Harris Christian Hart Poppy Hawkins Jack Hawley iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS John Simmonds Maureen Toth Steve Smolinsky Jane Mumtaz Vishal St. Sauveur John Karen Weihs Stone James Taylor Richard Zarro Joel Teague Sylvia Marilyn Zatkin Topel Deborah Zeigler Matundu Mamingi to our African and American drummer and dancer friends TaTitos Sompa TaMbemba TaMalonga Fred Simpson Thanks to Gary-Michael Bean for his suggestions and work. Thanks to our staff Laura Grinder Stephanie Mader Mark Carroll Jerry Mader Thanks to our friends who played such an important role in commenting. Bob Dilts Don Steiny Susan Marcus TABLE OF CONTENTS A Beginning ix Preface xi Prerequisites For Personal Genius Day One 3 Day Two 94 Day Three 180 Day Four 255 Day Five 338 Afterword 385 Footnotes 387 Bibliography 391 Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world, unreasonable men at- tempt to adapt the world to them- selves. That's why all progress de- pends on unreasonable men. George Bernard Shaw To our former teacher Gregory Bateson We hope he would be, at least, amused. John Grinder Judith DeLozier viii WARNING WARNING TO THE READER Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) represents a significant advance in the develop- ment of human choice. It places at the discretion of the skilled and balanced practitioner options for living with quality which were previously assigned variously to fate, chance, genetics, accidents and divine influence. It is important to me to explicate at least partially what I intend by the descriptive phrase, skilled and balanced. The skill issue points to the requirement in the mastery of any interesting human skill set for a commitment to practice, the personal discipline on the part of the would-be NLP practitioner to arrange his or her own context for exploring, learning and ultimately mastering of the actual body of patterning called NLP. Success at this task identifies a learner, and the result a technician. The balanced issue refers to two requirements, first, the learner's ability to integrate the skill set (mastered by the technician) into each and every area of their life, personal as well as professional. Secondly, once this integration of the technical skill set has occurred, the individual is faced with the awesome responsibility of exercising these choices with some wisdom. At this point, the caterpillar bursts the confinement of the cocoon, the technician transforms herself/himself into an artist. All the above is a somewhat circuitous way of cautioning the would-be NLP practitioner. The world at the moment seems rather overflowing with people purporting to offer training in NLP. It is here in selecting a mentor that you, the reader, may begin to exercise one of the most crucial abilities associated with artistry in the practice of NLP—namely, that of assessing the congruency of the purported trainer. If your intuitions caution you, if you detect a discrepancy between the verbal presentation of such a person and their actual behavior and performance, keep moving and looking for an appropriate model. If you are seriously interested in having access to quality training or business consulting applications which rest firmly on the foundation of NLP which I intended when I co-created the discipline, I invite you to contact me at: John Grinder QUANTUM LEAP P.O. Box 67359 Scotts Valley, CA 95067-7359 TEL) 408-457-0529 FAX) 408-457-2834 IX A BEGINNING William James is usually considered the father of American psychology.' He was once invited to deliver a series of lectures at Harvard on a topic of his choosing. These lectures were presented on the green and were special in that they were open to the public. After some deliberation, he chose boldly ?nd the title for his first presentation wasCan One Prove The Existence of God?, a topic sure to raise eyebrows in the early part of this century in New England. Thus, it was with some trepidation that he watched the audience file into the lecture hall and, sure enough, at the very last moment, a little old lady rushed down the center aisle and deposited herself from row center. Professor James presented his topic with his usual wit and charm. He noted as he worked his way through his lecture that the little old lady was very attentive and seemed to be enjoying herself—he did mark the fact that she seemed to laugh when no one else did. Nevertheless, all seemed quite in order. At the end of the presentation, which was very well received, the inevitable queue formed. And, of course, at the end of the queue was the little old lady. When her turn came, she looked up brightly at James and said: "Dr. James, I very much enjoyed your lecture. But I do still have one question." "Please, madame, ask your question!" returned William James courteously. "Well, Dr. James," she replied with a glint in her eye, "If there's no God, what keeps the earth from falling down?" James quickly reviewed his options—he considered such explanatory notions as centripetal force, gravitational systems .,. but wisely chose to respond in a way as to learn something from this woman. Turning his attention back to her, he said, "Madame, I would be happy to answer your question, but tell me what it is that you x A BEGINNING believe keeps the earth from falling down?" "Why, that's very simple. Dr. James, the earth is resting on the back of a gigantic turtle!" James mused to himself over her extraordinary response for a moment and then with a hint of triumph in his voice asked the obvious question. "The, pray tell me, Madame, what keeps this gigantic turtle from falling down?" "No! No! No! Dr. James," replied the little old lady, "You can't get me there—it's turtles all the way down!" XI PREFACE Immediate Context In March of 1986, the two of us, John Grinder and Judith DeLozier, conducted a seminar called Prerequisites To Personal Genius in San Francisco, California with people from North and South America, Europe and Africa. For over twenty-five cumulative years, we have developed models of people who were considered geniuses by our society. In this modeling, certain simple personal competencies were again and again uncovered—independent of substance—whether the genius was a master hypnotist, strategic corporate planner, dancer, or negotiator. These formal principles, while simple, are not easy. The task facing us was to assist the seminar participant in making the arrangements for the development and integration of these competencies—these prerequisites to personal genius. This document is the consequence of that San Francisco seminar and has the same purpose. It is, however, important to understand that there are profound differences between a seminar with face-to-face communication and a written document. The major difference revolves around the fact that the bulk of the communication in a face-to-face seminar is nonverbal and, of course, a written document relies exclusively on language. Thus, we were challenged with the task of developing a balanced document which somehow was faithful to the experiences of the seminar and at the same time coded exclusively in a linear verbal code. In order to accomplish this, inserts were added to promote universality and participation on the part of the reader and to fill in gaps which were covered by nonverbal communication in the face-to- face experience of the seminar. Thus the document you are about to read is partially a verbal transcript from the seminar and partially a translation of portions of the nonverbal communication from that xii PREFACE seminar into the verbal code. Further, while the seminar was completed in five days, it was, in a deeper sense, and is truly unfinished both for us and the participants—the process had been put into movement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Truth About NLP Eye Patterns and Their Relationship with Academic Performance in Business and Management Studies (MBA)
    International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 8, No. 23; 2013 ISSN 1833-3850 E-ISSN 1833-8119 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Lying Eyes: The Truth about NLP Eye Patterns and Their Relationship with Academic Performance in Business and Management Studies (MBA) Kamarul Zaman Ahmad1 1 College of Business Administration, Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates Correspondence: Kamarul Zaman Ahmad, College of Business Administration, Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates. E-mail: [email protected] Received: October 2, 2013 Accepted: October 30, 2013 Online Published: November 15, 2013 doi:10.5539/ijbm.v8n23p67 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n23p67 Abstract This article looks at the relationship between eye patterns (i.e., how eyes move according to what the person is thinking or feeling) according to Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) and students’ achievement in a course in an MBA program in Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates. Participants for the study (N = 33) graduate students from the course. All participants were right-handed. Results show that, except for visual recall, less than half of the respondents exhibited the remaining eye patterns (i.e., visual construct, verbal recall, verbal construct, kinaesthetic and auditory digital), posited by the founders of NLP. Put in another way, respondents on average exhibited about two out of the six posited eye patterns. Correlations between eye patterns and exam results reveal that students who displayed eye patterns corresponding with verbal recall and kinaesthetic feelings, tend to do better in the exams. This paper discusses the possible benefit of training students to conform to verbal recall and kinaesthetic eye patterns, and teaching courses that emphasise on verbal recall and kinaesthetic feelings.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericksonian Hypnosis and the Enneagram About Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP)
    The Changeworks Consulting, Training, Books and CDs Workshops with Thomas Condon PO Box 5909, Bend, OR 97708 001-541-382-1894 email: [email protected] http://www.thechangeworks.com Ericksonian Hypnosis and the Enneagram About Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) NLP is a set of distinctions and techniques for altering the structure of subjective experience. Created in the 1970’s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, NLP is based in linguistics, psychology and communication. Among other things it offers a model of good communication and good rapport. It has had extensive applications in the fields of business, education, training and health, as well as in therapeutic changework. NLP is based upon the premise that experience has structure, and that by altering the structure, you can alter the experience. NLP helps you analyze how you create your subjective experience through your senses. At any given moment, your internal experience has a visual part - what you see around you or in your mind’s eye; an auditory part - hearing the sounds in your environment or listening to internal voices; and a kinesthetic part - your emotions and body feelings. As you experience the world through your five senses, you interpret the information and then act on it. In broad strokes, NLP helps you recognize your primary sensory modality – whether you are generally visual or auditory or kinesthetic or favor a combination of those primary senses. Nobody is really purely auditory, visual or kinesthetic, but you might find that you have a favorite orientation. Once you’ve determined your existing sensory bias, NLP offers techniques to expand your experience of your other senses.
    [Show full text]
  • George Miller & Noam Chomsky's Contributions To
    From: L. Michael Hall 2016 “Neurons” Meta Reflections – #40 August 29, 2016 Reflections about NLP #6 GEORGE MILLER & NOAM CHOMSKY’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO NLP The people who obviously contributed to NLP and the development of the NLP Model were the three communication “magicians” (Perls, Satir, and Erickson) and the two “grandfathers” of NLP— Gregory Bateson who taught and mentored them all and Alfred Korzybski who invented the very idea of “neuro-linguistics” and “neuro-semantics.” Yet there were others. Other contributors that made NLP what NLP is today who may not be so obvious. Two of them were the founders of the Cognitive Psychology Movement: George Miller and Noam Chomsky. Both men created a distinction in 1956 that changed the face of Psychology which has led to dating The Cognitive Psychology Movement to 1956. Noam Chomsky and Transformational Grammar (TG) What Noam Chomsky did in 1956 was publish the Transformational Grammar (TG) model in his Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. In doing so landed a death-blow to Behaviorism. For half a century from John Watson’s original work in Behaviorism and B.J. Skinner’s work, in associative conditioning, Behaviorism or Learning Theory was the Psychology of Choice. It had proven useful and effective in many areas. What Chomsky demonstrated was that Behaviorism was inadequate in explaining language development. In fact, he showed that it did not work. He demonstrated that we have a “language acquisition device” within us by which we learn language. That’s why children learn as it were the rules of language and then invent sentences that they have never heard.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Bandler and John Grinder
    Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. Vol. I Richard Bandler and John Grinder 1 We dedicate this book with the highest reverence to Ghost O.T. a little snow in summer and Mazda (the car for people who can hear) 2 Table of Contents Processes. , , , . , . , . , . , . , . , , , 209 .PREFACE……………………………………Vii Transderivational Phenomena. , . , . , 217 AACKNOWLEDGMENTS. .. xi Ambiguity. 233 GGUIDE TO VOLUME I of Patterns of Erickson's Lesser Included Structures. .. , . , , , . ,. 237 Work 1 Derived Meanings, . , . , . , . , 241 Summary of Part III ... .. 247 PART I EPILOGUE. .. .. .. 253 Identification of Patterns of Erickson's Hypnotic Work. ………………………………………………..5 Introduction: The Map Is Not the Territory. …... 7 APPENDIX Preview of Patterns. .. ….. .. 15 Syntactic Environments for Identifying Natural Language Presuppositions in English. , , . The Interspersal Hypnotic Technique for Symptom …………………. , " 257 Correction and Pain Control. ………... .. 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY. .. 263 Basic Trance Induction, with Commentary. .. .. 51 A Special Inquiry with Aldous Huxley into the Nature and Character of Various States of Consciousness, with Commentary. … . ………… . .. 59 PARTII Familiarization with Patterns of Erickson's Hypnotic Work. ….. …... .. 127 Introduction. .. .. 129 PART II (continued) Pacing, Distraction and Utilization of the Dominant Hemisphere. …….. .. 137 Accessing the Non-Dominant Hemisphere. .. 179 Conclusion to Part II ……………………………201 PART III Construction of the Patterns of Erickson's Hypnotic Work. , . , , , . , ……………….
    [Show full text]
  • ! NLP Articles Neuro Linguistic Programming!
    ! NLP Articles Neuro Linguistic Programming! General Inspiritive NLP Articles Main Page Life Coaching Articles About Inspiritive Articles by Steve Andreas People Company Policies Inspiritive NLP Articles NLP Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) information FAQ NLP FAQ Articles Book & Audio Body language rapport and influence Reviews Interviews What is a Well-Formed Outcome Who's Who in NLP Links A Description of Personal Evolution and NLP NLP training Certification Managing Emotions Courses Accreditation Information vs Interpretation Assessment NLPTRB What is NLP, what is the difference NLP between classic code NLP and New code applications Short Courses NLP. What makes NLP an epistemology? Corporate Consulting Personal The Value of NLP Practitioner training Consultation Life Coaching new! What is Modelling http://www.inspiritive.com.au/articles.htm (1 of 3) [7/20/2002 4:51:21 PM] ! NLP Articles Neuro Linguistic Programming! Education The difference between the fields of NLP Extra Newsletters and Psychology - to be posted soon Processes Glossary Mailing list Life Coaching Articles Search Life Coaching FAQ Contact Us E-mail Life Coaching with NLP +61 2 96985611 Becoming an Inspiritive Life Coach Your Values and Life Coaching with NLP Life wasn't meant to be easy So Why would you want a Life Coach? Know Your Past and Change Your Future Steve Andreas Articles Looking Backward A Brief History of Timelines Using Your Buts Well NLPers doing Therapy Modal Operators Certainty and Uncertainty http://www.inspiritive.com.au/articles.htm (2 of 3) [7/20/2002 4:51:21 PM] Inspiritive General Main Page About Inspiritive People What is NLP, what is the difference Company between classic code and New code.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurolinguistic Programming
    Neurolinguistic Programming Author/s: Leonard C. Bruno Definition Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) is a technique that shows people how to change or "reprogram" their thoughts, feelings, and actions by simple mental exercises. Purpose In the areas of medicine and health care, NLP can help people discover the unconscious negative thought patterns they have about their illnesses and help them to change their mental and emotional responses so that they reinforce the positive, healing process. Precautions In case of a serious illness, NLP should not be used by itself or to the exclusion of traditional medical remedies. Description Neurolinguistic programming has been called software for the brain. If we take the computer as a model, our thoughts and beliefs are regarded as software programs that, if changed, can alter behavior. This concept was developed in the mid-1970s by Richard Bandler, an information scientist, and John Grinder, a linguistics professor. After observing several highly successful individuals in the fields of linguistics, psychology, anthropology, and communications, they were able to isolate the essential qualities common to each that were responsible for their excellence and success. The essence they distilled from their observation and study became their NLP model. They named it Neurolinguistic Programming because "neuro" refers to the brain, "linguistic" relates to verbal and nonverbal expressions, and "programming" suggests habitual thought patterns. NLP was devised first to make people aware of their unconscious limiting thought and behavior patterns, and, second, to show them how they can change these automatic patterns and create new ways of thinking and feeling. These new patterns open up new choices and new behaviors that help people achieve their goals.
    [Show full text]
  • NLP – Origins, Concepts and Controversies
    Volume 15 Issue 3-4 3 - 4 / 2 0 1 7 tamarajournal.com NLP – origins, concepts and controversies Gabriel Remus Suciu [email protected] Keywords Abstract NeuroLinguistic This article is an introduction to NLP (NeuroLinguistic Programming). The Programming education system, in good Aristotelian tradition, has instill the practice that any introduction must present simple things on which to build further more complex John Grinder things. However, it can easily be argued that it does not matter where you start Richard Bandler (with simple things or with complex things); it is important to continue and do not Frank Pucelik stop. This is also recommended by this article with its three parts: origins, concepts and controversies. In other words, this article is important to the extent Presuppositions that the reader will read further articles of and about NLP, being a molecule of water spilled into an ocean. Origins and concepts The Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) field was born in Santa Cruz, California in the early 1970s, with the support of two founders: John Grinder (a linguist) and Richard Bandler (a psychologist). These two, helped among others by Gregory Bateson, have tried to model theories of three famous psychologists of those times: Milton Erickson, Fritz Perls and Virginia Satir. As a result they wrote several books (for instance, “The structure of magic”, or “Patterns of the hypnotic techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D.”) consecrating this field once for all: “The concept for NLP was originated ten years ago by John Grinder and Richard Bandler. These two men studied the working processes of noted therapists such as Fritz Perls (Gestalt), Virginia Satir (family therapy) and Milton H.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of NLP
    A Brief History of NLP Neuro Linguistic Programming was developed in the 1970s as a result of a research project on human communication conducted by John Grinder, a professor of Linguistics, and Richard Bandler, a postgraduate psychologist. Grinder and Bandler studied three outstanding therapists: - Fritz Perls (the originator of Gestalt Therapy), Virginia Satir (an eminent Family Therapist) and Milton Erickson (a world famous hypnotherapist) with the aim of identifying the patterns they used. Rather than concern themselves with developing new theories, they sought to reproduce specific, successful and repeatable patterns of behaviour that successful therapists used, and that worked in practice, in a way that could be taught to others. While the three therapists they modelled were very different personalities, the underlying patterns elicited proved to be surprisingly similar. From the initial work, Grinder and Bandler produced two language models, the Meta Model and the Milton Model, together with a range of 'change techniques'. They also formalised the techniques and approaches they had used to study or model the work of the therapists. From these initial models, NLP developed two complementary aspects:- Firstly as a process to discover patterns of excellence in any field , known as modelling, involving breaking down complex human performance into small enough chunks so that the critical components can be replicated and taught to others. Secondly NLP developed as a 'how to' technology - helping others to learn the underlying patterns of thinking and communicating used by outstanding people and develop skills that enhance the effectiveness of communication, facilitate personal change, accelerate learning, and enrich enjoyment of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuro-Linguistic Programming Unit 1 Day 3 - NLP Your Trainer Today: Greg Elsey
    Neuro-Linguistic Programming Unit 1 Day 3 - NLP Your Trainer Today: Greg Elsey Masters in NLP NLP 2 Housekeeping Phones to silent Emergency Exits Bathroom Kitchen Start on time – 10:00am Finish 4:30pm Lunch - 1 hour Leave the classroom as you found it NLP 3 Outcomes To be aware of the concepts and terminology of NLP. To experience some NLP Processes and how they can be used in Hypnotherapy. NLP 4 What is NLP? Neuro: The neurological system through which experiences are translated into conscious or unconscious thought. Linguistic: How people communicate and how language is used to make sense of experiences. Programming: The fundamental NLP concept that behaviour and thinking can be coded and consequently reproduced. The programs of the mind. NLP 5 History of NLP NLP began in the early 1970’s. Started by John Grinder (assistant professor of linguistics), and Richard Bandler (student studying computer programming and psychology). They modelled Virginia Satir (Family Therapist), Fritz Perls (Physchotherapist and founder of Gestalt), and Milton Erickson (Hypnotherapist). John Grinder and Richard Bandler took these models and: 1) Discovered patterns of excellence. 2) Found effective ways of thinking and communicating. The creators of NLP Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the mid 70’s referred to NLP as, "an attitude, and a methodology that leaves behind a trail of techniques". Was built on by others such as: Robert Dilts, Frank Pucelik, Steven and Connirae Andreas, Judith DeLozier, Leslie Cameron Bandler, Michael Hall, David Gordon, Steve Gilligan. NLP 6 The 3 Minds Higher Conscious Mind Knows your purpose, is non-judgemental, non-critical.
    [Show full text]
  • NLP Words and Phrases to Increase the Positive Intentions in Speaking and Writing the HISTORY and BACKGROUND of NLP
    NLP Words and Phrases to Increase the Positive Intentions In Speaking and Writing THE HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF NLP Wikipedia.org Definition: Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is an approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created by Richard Bandler and John Grinder inCalifornia, United States in the 1970s. Its creators claim a connection between the neurological processes ("neuro"), language ("linguistic") and behavioral patterns learned through experience ("programming") and that these can be changed to achieve specific goals in life.[1][2] Bandler and Grinder claim that the skills of exceptional people can be "modeled" using NLP methodology, then those skills can be acquired by anyone.[3][4][5][6][7] Bandler and Grinder also claim that NLP can treat problems such as phobias, depression, habit disorder, psychosomatic illnesses, myopia,[8]allergy, common cold,[9] and learning disorders, often in a single session.[10][11][12][13] NLP has been adopted by somehypnotherapists and in seminars marketed to business and government.[14][15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming ******* NLP University, one of the places I’ve learned a lot from! From their Home Page … All of the models and techniques of NLP are based on the combination of two principles: [1] The Map is Not the Territory, and [2] Life and ‘Mind’ are Systemic Processes. In the belief system of NLP it is not possible for human beings to know objective reality. Wisdom, ethics and ecology do not derive from having the one 'right' or 'correct' map of the world, because human beings would not be capable of making one.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuro-Linguistic Programming and Its Implications for English Language Learners and Teachers
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 1141-1147, September 2020 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1009.19 Neuro-linguistic Programming and Its Implications for English Language Learners and Teachers Neda Hedayat Department of Language Teaching and Translation, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran Reza Raissi Department of Language Teaching and Translation, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran Solmaz Azizzadeh Asl Department of Language Teaching and Translation, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran Abstract—In the world we live in, education is praised as a base for training and nurturing future generations and teaching is considered as a valuable profession through which future generations are flourished. The main components of each educational system must work well in order to create a successful system and achieve the desired results. Teachers are considered as one of the key determinant factors and active decision-makers of any educational system. Learners are also taken into account as one of the main elements of the system who are instructed to reach some educational goals. Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), with high potential for English teaching and learning, is regarded as a supplementary technique which helps the teachers to develop outstanding skills like critical thinking, self-efficacy, and rapport which are necessary to bring on success and achievement to the education and to support learners to achieve excellence in their performance. The article first presents a brief history and definition of NLP. Then it is followed by some information about the main pillars of neuro-linguistic programming.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with John Grinder 1996 by Chris and Jules Collingwood
    An interview with John Grinder 1996 By Chris and Jules Collingwood The interview was at the end of part one of a two-part seminar on Pattern Detection conducted in July 1996 in Boulder, Colorado with NLP Comprehensive. Part two was held in September 1996. 1. As one of the few individuals who has developed a whole new field of endeavour, do you have any thoughts regarding the circumstances that make it possible to be in that position? There is a metaphor which is extremely common in western European traditions in which an investigator establishes his or her contribution while simultaneously paying tribute to the work which forms the foundation which makes possible their specific contribution. This is typically expressed by noting that the new contributor can see farther than the original giants who established the foundation for their new work by standing on their shoulders. But for me, personally, this is quite misleading and not at all congruent with my experience. Rather than a physical metaphor – that is, the additional height achieved by standing on the shoulders of the giants who preceded me, it seems to me that what Bandler and I did in our original work – the classic code of NLP – was much more accurately captured by the idea of seeing in a totally different way rather than seeing farther. So while one of the circumstances which made it possible for us to create NLP certainly was the previous work, especially by Russell, Turing, Godel, Chomsky, and Bateson as well as the specific models of Perls, Satir and Erickson, the actual value added by our activity was an audacious style of provoking the world by refusing the common sensical wisdom, most assuredly by rejecting the presuppositions of the vast majority of researchers active in the field, by seeking to extend the patterning to its limits and by creating the process tools (at a higher logical level than the content of the investigations) to enable others to follow the paths of discovery which lie all around us.
    [Show full text]