Parasite-Host Interactions Between Thevarroamite and the Honey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasite-Host Interactions Between Thevarroamite and the Honey Parasite-host interactions between the Varroa mitean dth e honeybe e A contribution to sustainable Varroacontro l Johan N.M. Calis Promotoren: Professor Dr.J.C . van Lenteren Hoogleraar ind e Entomologie,Wageninge n Universiteit Professor Dr. M.W. Sabelis Hoogleraar ind e Populatiebiologie, Universiteit van Amsterdam ^tio^\ ,2oft Stellingen behorend bij het proefschrift Parasite-host interactions between the Varroa mite and the honey bee, a contribution to sustainable control van Johan N.M. Calis. 1. Imkeren met gezonde bijenvolken is mogelijk zonder het gebruik van synthetische acariciden. Imdorf,A ,Charriere ,J D& Fluri ,P (1999 )Alternativ e strategies forth econtro lo facaricid e resistant Varroa mites.Proceedings ofthe 36" "Apimondia congress, Vancouver,Canada , pp 143;Di t proefschrift. 2. Zolang imkers de varroamijt bestrijden,za lva n natuurlijke selectie voor minder gevoelige honingbijen geen sprake zijn. 3. Wanneer de ontwikkelingsduur van werksters van Europese honingbijen (Apis mellifera subsp.), net als bij de Kaapse honingbij (Apis mellifera capensis), gekoppeld is aan kenmerken die bij de kaste-differentiatie een rol spelen, is dit kenmerk niet geschikt voor selectie op honingbijen die minder gevoelig zijn voor de varroamijt. Beekman, M, Calis,JNM , Boot,W J (2000) Parasitic Cape honeybees get royal treatment. Nature 404:723 ;Di t proefschrift. 4. Het voortplantingsucces van de varroamijt in het broed van de westerse honingbij, Apis mellifera, is veel lager dan in het darrenbroed van de oosterse honingbij,Apis cerana. Wanneer de varroamijt zich ook bij de westerse honingbij specialiseert op broed van een type, kan verwacht worden dat het voortplantingsucces vand e varroamijt hogerwordt . 5. De thelytoke voortplanting van werksters van de Kaapse honingbij is niet de oorzaak van hun parasitisme in volken van de Afrikaanse honingbij, het draagt echter wel bij aan deteloorgan g van dezevolken . Beekman, M, Calis,JNM , Boot,W J (2Q00) Parasitic Cape honeybees get royal treatment. Nature 404:723 . 6. Bij het vaststellen of inbouwen van verdedigingsmechanismen tegen plaaginsecten bij gewassen wenselijk is, dient de toxiciteit voor de op het gewas fouragerende bijenvolken inogenschou w genomen teworden . 7. De toegenomen participate van vrouwen op de arbeidsmarkt heeft ervoor gezorgd dat de voortplantingsstrategie van de mens niet alleen vaak lijkt op die van de kip, maaroo k steeds vaker op die van de cassuarier. 8. Het aanleggen van de Betuwelijn geeft uiting aan een Haagse vorm van rivierblindheid. ->n Parasite-host interactions between the Varroamit e andth e honey bee A contribution to sustainable Varroa control Johan N.M. Calis Proefschrift ter verkrijging van degraa dva n doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. Dr. Ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen opdinsdag26juni2001 des ochtends te elf uur in de Aula /.,-"> ' V to^: •» CENTRALE LANDBOUWCATALOGUS 0000 0807 3997 Calis, Johannes Nicolaas Maria (2001) Parasite-host interactions between the Varroamit e and the honey bee A contribution to sustainable Varroacontro l Thesis Wageningen Universiteit. -With ref. -With summary in Dutch ISBN no. 99-5808-446-9 Ter nagedachtenis aanJoo p Beetsma Table of contents page General introduction,objective s and summary 9 Chapter 1:Invasio n behaviour of Varroajacobsoni Oud.: from bees into brood cells. J. Beetsma,W.J .Boo t &J.N.M . Calis, 1999.Apidologi e 30: 125-140. 17 Chapter 2: Control of Varroab ycombinin g trapping in honey bee worker broodwit hformi caci d treatment ofth e capped brood outsideth e colony: putting knowledge on brood cell invasion into practice. J.N.M. Calis,W.J . Boot, J. Beetsma, J.H.P.M.va n den Eijnde,A . de Ruijter & J.J.M. van der Steen, 1998. Journal of Apicultural Research 37:205-215 . 33 Chapter 3: Effective biotechnical control of Varroa:applyin g knowledge on brood cell invasion to trap honey bee parasites indron e brood. J.N.M. Calis,W.J .Boot ,J.Beetsma ,J.H.P.M .va nde n Eijnde,A . de Ruijter & J.J.M. van der Steen, 1999.Journa l of Apicultural Research 38:49-61 . 47 Chapter 4: Model evaluation of methods for Varroajacobsoni mite control based ontrappin g mites in honey bee brood. J.N.M. Calis,W.J . Boot &J . Beetsma, 1999.Apidologi e 30: 197-207. 63 Chapter 5: Population modelling of Varroajacobsoni Oud. J.N.M. Calis, I. Fries &S.C . Ryrie, 1999.Apidologi e 30: 111-124. 75 Chapter 6: Natural selection of Varroajacobsoni explains the different reproductive strategies in colonies ofApis ceranaan dApis mellifera. W.J. Boot,J.N. M Calis,J . Beetsma, D.M. Hai,N.K . Lan,T.V . Toan, L.Q. Trung & N.H. Minh, 1999. Experimental andApplie d Acarology 23:133-144. 97 Chapter 7: Reproductive success of Varroamite s in honey bee brood with differential development times. J.N.M. Calis,W.J . Boot &J . Beetsma. submitted. 109 Chapter 8: Attractiveness of brood cells to Varroamite s indifferen t honey bee races (Apismellifera). J.N.M. Calis,W.J . Boot &J . Beetsma. submitted. 123 Inleiding, onderzoeksdoelen en samenvatting 129 List of publications 137 Nawoord 141 Curriculum Vitae 143 General introduction,objective s andsummar y Introduction Varroamites asparasites ofhoney bees Varroa destructor (Anderson & Trueman, 2000), is the most important pest of European races of the Western honey bee, Apis mellifera L, weakening bees and vectoring bee diseases (Matheson, 1993). Over the past decades it has spread all over theworl d and control measures are requiredt o maintain healthy honey beecolonies . Originally, this mite only occurred in colonies of the Eastern honey bee, Apis cerana Fabr., in Asia. Varroa destructor was formerly known as V. jacobsoni Oud. (Anderson &Trueman , 2000). The Varroamit e was described in 1904 by Oudemans as a parasite of Eastern honey bees in Indonesia. Although the actual damage inflicted by the mite to the Eastern honey bee has never been determined, the Varroa mite is not considered to be a problem in colonies of its original host. However, Varroaturne d into a serious pest of Western honey bees when beekeepers moved the Western honey bee intoth e area of distribution of the Eastern honey bee.Th e mite appeared to bea harmful parasite on its new host, but before this was realised it had already spread over the world through shipments of colonies and queens (De Jong et al., 1982; Matheson, 1993). Varroa mites may ruin Western honey bee colonies because parasitised bees suffer from malformations and a shortened life span (Beetsma et al., 1989). The Varroa mite feeds on both adult bees and brood, but reproduction is restricted to brood cells, which mites invade during the final larval developmental stage of the honey bee. Offspring is produced during the period that the immature bee develops in the capped brood cell and the mother and her progeny emerge together with the young bee. In addition to direct damage to bees through feeding, mites act as vectors of honey bee pathogens and increase the incidence of honey bee diseases (Ball, 1994). This threat of Varroa mites to beekeeping resulted in the development of acaricides and nowadays several effective acaricides are available which are applied world-wide (Koeniger & Fuchs, 1988; Ritter, 1990). However, the use ofacaricide s has important disadvantages. Acaricides contaminate bee products like honey and wax (De Greef, 1994) and thus the use of these acaricides is in conflict with the status of honey and wax as natural products. Another disadvantage is that mites have become resistant to these acaricides and this resistance is spreading world-wide, which implies the need for alternative ways of control. Towardssustainable Varroacontrol In this thesis, I present studies on biotechnical methods of Varroa control and studies on how variation in the honey bee's susceptibility to Varroa affects the mite population growth. In theory, biotechnical control methods in which mites are trapped in brood cells and removed from the colony, so-called trap-comb methods, are simple. In practice, however, these methods may become complicated because timing of application needs to be integrated in other activities of the beekeeper, such as swarm prevention. In addition,applicatio n of these methods is usually labour intensive. Effective trap-comb methods are available, but reduction of labour intensity is still needed. Much research is therefore directed to breed honey bees that are less susceptible to Varroa mites (Woyke, 1989; Buchler, 1994; Moritz, 1994). In this field, I investigated whether 10 General introduction reduced developmental time of bee brood and attractiveness of bee brood to mites are suitable traits for selection aiming at reduced susceptibility of honey bees to Varroa mites. If less susceptible honey bees are available, the high effectiveness of control methods needed for successful control may be relaxed. This in turn may allow simplification of biotechnical control methods. The aim of my thesis is to develop acaricide-free beekeeping by using alternative methods for effective control of Varroa. Objectives and research questions Applying knowledge on invasion behaviour in the development of biotechnical control methods andpopulation modelling The parasite-host interactions between the mite and the honey bee have been intensively studied, because such knowledge may lead to new ways of control. In earlier work, Icollaborate d with Beetsma and Boot (1995) to study invasion behaviour of mites into brood cells. Varroa mites survive on adult bees, but reproduction is restricted to the capped brood cell (Ifantidis & Rosenkranz, 1988). The rate of brood cell invasion defines the distribution of mites over bees and brood and,therefore , the population dynamics of the mite. The rate of invasion appeared to depend mainly on the ratio of brood cells that are being capped per bee inth e colony, as reviewed in Chapter 1. Inthi s thesis I applied this knowledge to design control methods that are based on trapping mites in bee brood.
Recommended publications
  • Effect of Season and Behavioral Activity on the Hypopharyngeal Glands of Three Honey Bee Apis Mellifera L
    JHR 68: 85–101Effect (2019) of season and behavioral activity on the hypopharyngeal glands of three honey bee ... 85 doi: 10.3897/jhr.68.29678 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net Effect of season and behavioral activity on the hypopharyngeal glands of three honey bee Apis mellifera L. races under stressful climatic conditions of central Saudi Arabia Hussain Ali1,2, Abdulaziz S. Alqarni1, Javaid Iqbal1,3, Ayman A. Owayss1, Hael S. Raweh1, Brian H. Smith4 1 Melittology Research lab, Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2 Entomology Section, Agricultural Research Institute Tarnab, Pesha- war, Pakistan 3 Department of Entomology, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan 4 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, USA Corresponding author: Javaid Iqbal ([email protected]) Academic editor: Jack Neff | Received 11 September 2018 | Accepted 13 December 2018 | Published 25 February 2019 http://zoobank.org/5DC593C1-A701-49B5-B308-ED11F854261E Citation: Ali H, Alqarni AS, Iqbal J, Owayss AA, Raweh HS, Smith BH (2019) Effect of season and behavioral activity on the hypopharyngeal glands of three honey bee Apis mellifera L. races under stressful climatic conditions of central Saudi Arabia. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 68: 85–101. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.68.29678 Abstract Honey production gains are needed to deal with high demand in Saudi Arabia. The honey bee races are facing stressful hot-arid weather conditions that can affect different aspects of physiology and behav- ior. The hypopharyngeal glands (HPGs) of honey bees have prominent roles in various social behav- iors through their secretions.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycles: Egg to Bee Free
    FREE LIFE CYCLES: EGG TO BEE PDF Camilla de La Bedoyere | 24 pages | 01 Mar 2012 | QED PUBLISHING | 9781848355859 | English | London, United Kingdom Tracking the Life Cycle of a Honey Bee - dummies As we remove the frames, glance over the thousands of busy bees, check for brood, check for capped honey, maybe spot the queen… then the frames go back in their slots and the hive is sealed up again. But in the hours spent away from our hives, thousands of tiny miracles are happening everyday. Within the hexagonal wax cells little lives are hatching out and joining the hive family. The whole process from egg to adult worker bee takes around 18 days. During the laying season late spring to summer the Queen bee is capable of laying over eggs per day. Her worker bees help direct her to the best prepared comb and she lays a single egg in each hexagon shaped cell. The size of the cell prepared determines the type of egg she lays. If the worker bees have prepared a worker size cell, she Life Cycles: Egg to Bee lay a fertilized egg. This egg will produce a female worker bee. If the worker bees have prepared a slightly larger cell, the queen will recognize this as a drone cell and lay an unfertilized egg. This will produce a male drone bee. It is the workers and not the queen that determine the ratio of workers to drones within the hive. In three days the egg hatches and a larva emerges. It looks very similar to a small maggot.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Morphometric and Reproductive Characters of Apis Mellifera Jemenitica, a Native Honey Bee to Saudi Arabia
    Bulletin of Insectology 66 (2): 239-244, 2013 ISSN 1721-8861 Queen morphometric and reproductive characters of Apis mellifera jemenitica, a native honey bee to Saudi Arabia Abdulaziz S. ALQARNI, Hassan M. BALHARETH, Ayman A. OWAYSS College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Abstract Ten traits of morphological characters and reproductive organs of newly emerged virgin queens of native and imported honey bee races, Apis mellifera jemenitica Ruttner (AMJ) and Apis mellifera carnica Pollman (AMC), were measured. The results for the comparison between the AMC and AMJ queens showed significant differences in most cases. The virgin AMC queens showed significantly increased body weight (165.9 ± 9.8 mg) over that of AMJ (137.8 ± 7.9 mg) in the two seasons of the study. In addi- tion, the AMC queens had significantly higher values than those of AMJ for all tested morphological traits, including the head capsule (2.61 × 2.44 mm versus 2.45 × 2.23 mm), right mandible (1.29 × 0.38 mm versus 1.18 × 0.37 mm), forewing (9.39 × 3.10 mm versus 9.17 × 3.00 mm), and the length of the 3rd + 4th abdominal tergites (5.95 mm versus 5.57 mm), respectively. The num- ber of ovarioles of the right ovary in the AMC queens was significantly higher (157.0 ± 14.9) than that (146.6 ± 13.9) of AMJ. The diameters of the spermathecae were 1.253 and 1.230 for AMC and AMJ, respectively, with significant differences between the two races in the 2nd season of the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Nest Characteristics of Apis Mellifera Jemenitica (Hymenoptera; Apidae) and Its Implications in Frame Hive Adoption
    Adgaba et al., The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26(4): 2016, Page:The J.1156 Anim.-1163 Plant Sci. 26(4):2016 ISSN: 1018-7081 NATURAL NEST CHARACTERISTICS OF APIS MELLIFERA JEMENITICA (HYMENOPTERA; APIDAE) AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN FRAME HIVE ADOPTION N. Adgaba1*, A. A. Al-Ghamdi1, A. Getachew1, Y. Tadesse1, A. Almaktary1, M. J. Ansari1, M. Al-Madani2 and D. Sharma1 1Eng. Abdullah Baqshan Chair for Bee Research, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Food and Agricultural Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia. 2Northern Highlands Regional Research Station, Agricultural Research & Extension Authority, Sa`adah, P.O Box 90225, Republic of Yemen * Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Apis mellefera jemenitica is the smallest race of A. mellifera both in its body and colony sizes. In the current study we assessed the natural nest volume, workers brood cell dimensions and bee space of the race through measuring their dimensions from naturally built combs in log hives. The optimum box hive volume and surface area requirement were assessed by keeping colonies at different volumes of frame hives with four replications each and monitored for a period of one year. The average occupied nest volume and comb surface area of the race in log hives were 12.28 ± 5.98 l and 8017.2 ± 3110.60 cm2 respectively which are significantly smaller than other A. mellifera races. The worker brood cells width and depth of the race were 4.07 ± 0.17 mm and 9.39 ± 0.42 mm respectively and the race builds an average of 262.5 more worker brood cells/dm2 than is built on embossed foundation sheets.
    [Show full text]
  • (Apis Mellifera) in Sweden Surviving Varroa Destructor Infestation Barbara Locke, Ingemar Fries
    Characteristics of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) in Sweden surviving Varroa destructor infestation Barbara Locke, Ingemar Fries To cite this version: Barbara Locke, Ingemar Fries. Characteristics of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) in Sweden surviving Varroa destructor infestation. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2011, 42 (4), pp.533-542. 10.1007/s13592-011-0029-5. hal-01003560 HAL Id: hal-01003560 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01003560 Submitted on 1 Jan 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2011) 42:533–542 Original article * INRA, DIB-AGIB and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0029-5 Characteristics of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) in Sweden surviving Varroa destructor infestation Barbara LOCKE, Ingemar FRIES Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Received 7 June 2010 – Revised 7 October 2010 – Accepted 13 October 2010 Abstract – A population of European honey bees (Apis mellifera) surviving Varroa destructor mite infestation in Sweden for over 10 years without treatment, demonstrate that a balanced host–parasite relationship may evolve over time. Colony-level adaptive traits linked to Varroa tolerance were investigated in this population to identify possible characteristics that may be responsible for colony survival in spite of mite infestations.
    [Show full text]
  • Olfactory Associative Behavioral Differences in Three Honey Bee Apis Mellifera L
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 26 (2019) 563–568 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com Original article Olfactory associative behavioral differences in three honey bee Apis mellifera L. races under the arid zone ecosystem of central Saudi Arabia ⇑ Javaid Iqbal a, , Hussain Ali a, Ayman A. Owayss a, Hael S.A. Raweh a, Michael S. Engel b,c, Abdulaziz S. Alqarni a, Brian H. Smith d a Melittology Research Lab, Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia b Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA c Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, NY, USA d School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, USA article info abstract Article history: Apis mellifera jemenitica is the indigenous race of honey bees in the Arabian Peninsula and is tolerant to Received 23 May 2018 local drought conditions. Experiments were undertaken to determine the differences in associative learn- Revised 30 July 2018 ing and memory of honey bee workers living in the arid zone of Saudi Arabia, utilizing the proboscis Accepted 5 August 2018 extension response (PER). These experiments were conducted on the indigenous race (A. m. jemenitica) Available online 6 August 2018 along with two introduced European races (A. m. carnica and A. m. ligustica). The data revealed that A. m. jemenitica is amenable to PER conditioning and may be used in conditioning experiments within Keywords: the olfactory behavioral paradigm. The results also demonstrated that the three races learn and retain Associative learning information with different capacities relative to each other during the experimental time periods.
    [Show full text]
  • {FREE} Life Cycles: Egg To
    LIFE CYCLES: EGG TO BEE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Camilla de La Bedoyere | 24 pages | 01 Mar 2012 | QED PUBLISHING | 9781848355859 | English | London, United Kingdom The Honey Bee Life Cycle This is the easily recognizable cell that we watch for. It is normal to have more than one queen cell at a time. Worker bees cap the cells with wax. On day 8, the larva becomes a pupa. Inside this capped queen cell, the final transformation takes place. Around day 16 a new queen will emerge. What is the first thing this new queen does? She searches out any possible rivals in other queen cells. When she finds them, she will chew into the cell and kill the virgin queen inside. Being royal is messy business. This is a real Game of Thrones happening inside the beehive. The rivalry is about genetics , only 1 bee can become the mother of the hive. Sometimes, the colony is in crisis. Perhaps the queen died quickly — or a beekeeper squished her? They must use a fresh larva that is already in place on the comb. This is called emergency queen rearing because the situation is not ideal. To produce a good queen, worker bees choose only the very youngest larva. Older larva may not develop into a quality queen bee because the nutrition of the first few days is so important. The size of a queen bee is affected by feeding during development. Queen bees reared in emergency conditions are not always the best quality. They may not lay as well or last as long as a queen bee that is raised during better hive conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolerance of Two Honey Bee Races to Various Temperature and Relative Humidity Gradients
    Environmental and Experimental Biology (2012) 10: 133–138 Original Paper Tolerance of two honey bee races to various temperature and relative humidity gradients Hossam F. Abou-Shaara*, Ahmad A. Al-Ghamdi, Abdelsalam A. Mohamed Baqshan`s Chair for Bee Research, Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract There are various factors that can have an effect on honey bee colonies. Temperature and relative humidity, in particularly, have special importance for honey bee colonies. Relatively few studies have been conducted on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on honey bee races. Here, the effects of different levels of temperature and relative humidity on survival, tolerance and body water loss were investigated on two races, one adapted to harsh conditions (Yemeni honey bees) and the other adapted to normal conditions (Carniolan honey bees). Results showed that temperature had higher effect than relative humidity on workers survival and Yemeni honey bees were more tolerant to elevated temperature than Carniolan honey bees. Moreover, rates of body water loss for the two races were high under elevated temperature and low humidity conditions. In general, the response of the two races in the studied treatments was somewhat similar. However, under extreme conditions at elevated temperature or low humidity, Yemeni honey bees showed higher tolerance than Carniolan honey bees. Key words: Apis mellifera carnica, Apis mellifera jemenitica, honey bees, humidity, temperature, tolerance, survival. Abbreviations: RH, relative humidity. Introduction activities, no clear direct impact of relative humidity on honey bees has been reported, including foraging activity The importance of temperature and relative humidity for (Joshi, Joshi 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Program
    Young Harris College / University of Georgia Beekeeping Institute 2021 May 13-14, 2020 • Online This marks the 29th year of the Young Harris College/University of Georgia Beekeeping Institute. It’s our goal to bring the best beekeeping educa- tors and scientists in the English-speaking world within reach of our beekeeper clients in Georgia and beyond. Each year we strive to present an ed- ucational event that meets the needs of everyone, whether an experienced beekeeper or new begin- ner. The result is quite simply one of the best bee- keeping educational events in North America. Unfortunately, due to the virtual format, we will not be able to offer the Georgia Master Beekeeper and Welsh Honey Judge programs, or the annu- al Honey Show. However, both the Metro Atlanta Since 1992 Beekeepers Association and the Tri County Bee- keepers Association will be offering the Certified level beekeeper written and practical exams. Tri County Beekeepers will hold their testing May 23rd, 2021 and Metro Beekeepers Association will Guest Speakers ...........................................page 3 hold their testing April 24th, 2021. Please contact them for more details and to sign up, since spots are limited. Staff and Instructors ...............................page 5 The UGA Bee Lab will offer both the Journeyman and Master level testing at the Georgia Beekeep- Class Descriptions ....................................page 7 ers Association Fall Meeting, September 23-25th. Details will be on the UGA Bee Lab website. Schedule for Thursday, May 13 ..........page 9 Schedule for Friday, May 14 ...............page 10 2021 Beekeeping Institute Guest Speakers Professor Robin Crewe For a period of ten years, (1986-1996) while Director of the Communication Biology Re- search Group of the University of Witwa- tersrand, Robin’s work was focused on the study of honey bee chemical communica- tion systems.
    [Show full text]
  • |||FREE||| the Life Cycle of a Honeybee
    THE LIFE CYCLE OF A HONEYBEE FREE DOWNLOAD Bobbie Kalman | 32 pages | 20 Mar 2004 | Crabtree Publishing Co,Canada | 9780778706946 | English | New York, Canada 1. The Queen Lays the Egg Keep reading to learn more about the honey bee life cycle, and what occurs in each stage. Varroa destructor Varroa sensitive hygiene Small hive beetle Waxworm American foulbrood Deformed wing virus Colony collapse disorder. The larvae are essentially helpless, without legs or even eyes. This will produce a male drone bee. Eggs are much easier to spot on a bright sunny day. After hatching, the bees spends an average of six days in the larval stage. Laying an egg takes only a few seconds, and a queen can place up to 2, eggs within a single day. August Learn how and when to remove this template message. Bahasa Melayu Edit links. The honey bee metamorphosis begins when the queen lays an egg. I nside the sealed egg cell, the larva begins to spin a cocoon around itself and pupate. When a queen bee first hatches, she is known as a virgin queen. Unlike the worker bees the drones do not sting. How Do Bees Taste? This egg will produce a female worker bee. The larva then surrounds itself with a cocoon inside the cell, similar to a butterfly. Her worker bees help direct her to the best prepared comb and she lays a single egg in each hexagon shaped cell. When a young and healthy queen lays eggs, she packs them closely together within the cells. Unlike a bumble bee colony or a paper wasp colony, the life of a honey bee colony is perennial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships Between Propolis Collecting Capability and Morphometric Features of Some Honey Bee Races and Ecotypes in Anatolia
    Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi Journal of Agricultural Sciences Tar. Bil. Der. Dergi web sayfası: Journal homepage: www.agri.ankara.edu.tr/dergi www.agri.ankara.edu.tr/journal The Relationships Between Propolis Collecting Capability and Morphometric Features of Some Honey Bee Races and Ecotypes in Anatolia a,d b c c Meral KEKEÇOĞLU , Nazife EROĞLU , Merve KAMBUR , Münir UÇAK a Düzce University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Konuralp, Düzce, TURKEY b The Scientific and Research Council of Turkey, Marmara Research Center, Food Institute, Gebze, TURKEY c Düzce University, Duzce Vocational School, Beekeeping Program, Düzce, TURKEY d Düzce University Beekeeping Reserch Development and Aplication Centre, Düzce, TURKEY ARTICLE INFO Research Article Corresponding Author: Meral KEKEÇOĞLU, E-mail: [email protected], Tel: +90 (380) 542 11 00/1032 Received: 06 August 2018, Received in Revised Form: 06 November 2018, Accepted: 22 December 2018 AUTHORS ORCID ID (Meral KEKEÇOĞLU: 0000-0002-2564-8343), (Nazife EROĞLU: 0000-0002-8618-2583), (Merve KAMBUR: 0000-0001- 9658-6584), (Münir UÇAK: 0000-0003-1538-6711) ABSTRACT of honey bee samples were evaluated by classic Propolis collecting capacity of the honey bee race, Apis morphometric technique to correlate propolis collecting mellifera L., distributed across Anatolia and Thrace regions capability and morphological features. Morphometric results of Turkey was investigated and correlated with of the present study showed that the largest wing and leg morphometric characteristics. Thus, the propolis collecting lengths belonged to Yığılca ecotype of A. m. anatoliaca and behaviour of honey bee races and ecotypes naturally have A. m. caucasica. Furthermore, Pearson correlation showed a been in Turkey, Apis mellifera caucasica, Apis mellifera significant relationship between some morphometric carnica, Apis mellifera syriaca and Yığılca and Muğla characteristics including the proboscis and mandibular ecotype of Apis mellifera anatoliaca were monitored.
    [Show full text]
  • Apis Mellifera Jemenitica Quee
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2019) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com Original article The responses of Apis mellifera jemenitica to different artificial queen rearing techniques ⇑ Nuru Adgaba a, Ahmad Al-Ghamdi a, , Yilma Tadesse a, Ramzi Alsarhan a, Arif Single a, Seif Eldin Mohammed b, Khalid Ali Khan a a Bagshan Chair for Bee Research, Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia b National Center for Research, P.O. Box 6096, Khartoum, Sudan article info abstract Article history: In the current study, we investigated if any variations exist in acceptance rate of grafted larvae and qual- Received 18 February 2018 ity of queens reared in different queen cell cup sizes, between wet and dry grafting and between queen Revised 3 August 2018 right and queen less conditions of A. m. jemenitica colonies. The acceptance rate of grafted larvae in dif- Accepted 31 August 2018 ferent queen cell cup sizes (7.0 mm, 7.5 mm, 8.0 mm, 8.5 mm) were varying from 69 to 71% and the vari- Available online xxxx ations were not significant among the different queen cups sizes but averagely lower than the acceptances recorded for other races. Out of the 172 dry grafted larvae, only 56.4% of them were accepted Keywords: while in wet grafting out of 174 grafted larvae 77.01% were accepted. Regarding the rate of sealing, Queen rearing 48.84% and 71.84% of them sealed for dry and wet grafts, respectively.
    [Show full text]