DOCSLIB.ORG

Session IV Law, Morality, and Culture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Session IV Law, Morality, and Culture Session IV Law, Morality, Johan D. van der Vyver Rev. David W. Hall and Culture George Harinck Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 5, Number 1 (Spring 2002), 211–249 Copyright © 2002 The Jurisprudential Legacy of Abraham Kuyper Johan D. van der Vyver and Leo XIII Emory University School of Law Toward the end of the nineteenth century, two religiously committed digni- taries, acting independently of one another and indeed in two quite distinct communities within the Christian tradition, produced significant contributions to social, political, and legal thought. Their special influence within the respec- tive religious communities from which they stemmed was, in itself, remark- able. Even more remarkable is the fact that aspects of their sociopolitical and jurisprudential theories are clearly echoed in distinct doctrines reflected in contemporary international law. Abraham Kuyper (1837–1920), a Dutch Calvinist theologian, philosopher, and politician, played a decisive role in developing the doctrine of sphere sov- ereignty to denote the relationship of power that ought to prevail between social entities such as the body politic, church institutions, and cultural com- munities. Within the context of constitutional law, sphere sovereignty— properly defined—constitutes a feasible criterion for identifying instances of, for example, political totalitarianism; that is, interference of the repositories of governmental powers in the private lives of their subordinates and excessive control by governmental agencies of the internal affairs of institutions other than the State. In international law, sphere sovereignty finds expression in the principle of the self-determination of peoples. In the context of political philosophy, the legacy of Pope Leo XIII (1878–1903) takes on a different—though not unrelated—nuance: Through the encyclical Rerum Novarum of 1891, he guided Scholastic thought in regard to the basic directive of the law (proclaiming human dignity to be the standard 211 The Jurisprudential Legacy of Johan D. van der Vyver Abraham Kuyper and Leo XIII of all law) and of the exercise of political power (emphasizing the obligation nate the range of competencies of the Church over against those of the State.1 of the State to promote the common good). As far as contemporary norms of The idea itself, however, preceded this descriptive phrase by approximately international law are concerned, the encyclical is of special importance as a three hundred years. According to Herman Dooyeweerd, “the first modern prelude toward the development of economic and social rights as a distinct formulation of the principle of internal sphere-sovereignty in the societal rela- component of the human rights paradigm. tionship” is to be found in a statement of the medieval Calvinistic jurist, The common ground of the contributions of Kuyper and Leo XIII to polit- Johannes Althusius (1557–1638).2 Althusius proclaimed that all distinct social ical theory and international-law perceptions is their shared emphasis on the entities are governed by their own laws and that those laws differ in every limitation of political power: in the case of Kuyper, by the distinct and equiv- instance according to the typical nature of the social institution concerned.3 alent enclave of competencies of non-State social entities, including peoples In the three hundred years that separated Althusius and Groen van defined by cultural or ethnic distinction; and in the case of Leo XIII, by a cer- Prinsterer, the concept of the internal sovereign authority of social entities sur- tain ethically defined objective of law and governmental powers to preserve faced from time to time, mostly in the ranks of Lutheran political scientists human dignity, to promote the common good, and, in particular, to care for the and, by and large, was confined to Church-State relations. Georg Friedrich economically and socially deprived sections of the community. Puchta (1798–1846), for example, spoke of die Selbstständigkeit (independ- This essay will seek to uncover, in Part 1, the analogies between the ence) of the Church as “an institution alongside the State,”4 and of the Church Kuyperian doctrine of sphere sovereignty on the one hand, and the current distinguishing itself “through the different nature of its essence.”5 Although notions of the right to self-determination of peoples on the other, and, in Part this clearly indicated sphere sovereignty in Church-State relations,6 Puchta 2, the influence that Pope Leo XIII might have had in introducing into the did not extend the principle to apply to other social entities. doctrine of human rights its “second generation” component of social and Georg Beseler (1809–1888) insisted on “sovereign” legislative powers of economic rights. local authorities,7 which sovereignty he went on to define as “the power belonging to certain corporations to enact, in their own discretion, their own Part 1: Sphere Sovereignty and the law (decrees, statutes, options) within the district governed by them or in any 8 Self-Determination of Peoples event in respect of their own affairs.” Friedrich Julius Stahl (1802–1861), the man who had a decisive influence on Groen van Prinsterer, again confined sovereign powers in the strict sense to The sphere sovereignty of a national or ethnic, religious or linguistic commu- State and Church only, proclaiming that these two institutions occupied places nity denotes the inherent competence of members of that community: independent of one another,9 that the Church was “an institution of an alto- • to establish institutions as a means of uniting their number and to gether different kind,”10 and that “ecclesiastical authority … is to be strictly facilitate the execution of their calling; distinguished from secular authority.”11 • to decide upon and organize the internal structures of such institu- Groen van Prinsterer also referred to sphere sovereignty in the context of tions; and Church-State relations only. He often spoke of “the independence of the State • to contrive and to proclaim rules of behavior and exercise author- over against the Church in consequence of its direct submission to God”12 and ity for the sake of order within their own ranks. defined the Church as a community of faith with its own characteristics, of which a confession was an indispensable ingredient.13 In one of his earlier Historical Perspective works he proclaimed: “The State is not subject to the Church, but together with the Church it is subject to God’s commandments.”14 From Althusius to Kuyper Within Calvinist circles in the Netherlands, Abraham Kuyper must be sin- gled out as the person who expanded the notion of sphere sovereignty beyond The Dutch expression souvereiniteit in eigen sfeer was first used in 1862 the enclave of Church-State relations to embrace the relationship between all by a Dutch politician, Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer (1801–1876), to desig- social institutions. “In every community,” he said, “one finds many different 212 213 The Jurisprudential Legacy of Johan D. van der Vyver Abraham Kuyper and Leo XIII of all law) and of the exercise of political power (emphasizing the obligation nate the range of competencies of the Church over against those of the State.1 of the State to promote the common good). As far as contemporary norms of The idea itself, however, preceded this descriptive phrase by approximately international law are concerned, the encyclical is of special importance as a three hundred years. According to Herman Dooyeweerd, “the first modern prelude toward the development of economic and social rights as a distinct formulation of the principle of internal sphere-sovereignty in the societal rela- component of the human rights paradigm. tionship” is to be found in a statement of the medieval Calvinistic jurist, The common ground of the contributions of Kuyper and Leo XIII to polit- Johannes Althusius (1557–1638).2 Althusius proclaimed that all distinct social ical theory and international-law perceptions is their shared emphasis on the entities are governed by their own laws and that those laws differ in every limitation of political power: in the case of Kuyper, by the distinct and equiv- instance according to the typical nature of the social institution concerned.3 alent enclave of competencies of non-State social entities, including peoples In the three hundred years that separated Althusius and Groen van defined by cultural or ethnic distinction; and in the case of Leo XIII, by a cer- Prinsterer, the concept of the internal sovereign authority of social entities sur- tain ethically defined objective of law and governmental powers to preserve faced from time to time, mostly in the ranks of Lutheran political scientists human dignity, to promote the common good, and, in particular, to care for the and, by and large, was confined to Church-State relations. Georg Friedrich economically and socially deprived sections of the community. Puchta (1798–1846), for example, spoke of die Selbstständigkeit (independ- This essay will seek to uncover, in Part 1, the analogies between the ence) of the Church as “an institution alongside the State,”4 and of the Church Kuyperian doctrine of sphere sovereignty on the one hand, and the current distinguishing itself “through the different nature of its essence.”5 Although notions of the right to self-determination of peoples on the other, and, in Part this clearly indicated sphere sovereignty in Church-State relations,6 Puchta 2, the influence that Pope Leo XIII might have had in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subsidiarity and a Free Society
    FEATURE SUBSIDIARITY AND A FREE SOCIETY Opponents of collectivism will find a rich resource in Catholic doctrine. “The Principle of Subsidiarity is opposed to all forms of collectivism. It sets the limits for state action.” —Catechism of the Catholic Church, par. 1885 ne of the key principles of Catholic Defining Subsidiarity social thought is known as the principle The word subsidiarity derives from the word of subsidiarity. Basically, this tenet “subsidiary,” which in turn has its roots in the holds that nothing should be done by Latin word subsidium. In simple terms, subsidiarity Oa large, complex governing order when a smaller, means “help” or “assistance,” simpler order will suffice. Subsidiarity, understood implying, among other things, that in this sense, is opposed to forms of centralisation, a higher governing order such as bureaucratisation, and welfare assistance, which the modern state has an obligation ultimately deprive citizens of their responsibility to help or assist individuals and toward themselves, their families, and their societies. lower social groups to flourish, Rather, the concept supports personal freedom not to swamp or absorb them. and responsibility as much as a proper balance Despite similarities with Calvinist between the public and private spheres, resulting in the recognition of the common good inherently promoted through the spontaneous actions Dr. Augusto Zimmermann is chair in legal theory and interactions between free and responsible and constitutional law at Murdoch University School of individuals. This principle is therefore a bulwark Law, president of the Western Australian Legal Theory of limited government and personal freedom. As Association, and co-author of Global Perspectives on such, subsidiarity conflicts with the centralization Subsidiarity (Springer, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Cpj's 2017 Kuyper Lecture
    CPJ’S 2017 KUYPER LECTURE Rediscovering Sphere Sovereignty in the Age of Trump Dr. Charles Glenn April 27, 2017 Grand Rapids, Michigan Most Americans have never heard of Abraham Kuyper. If they have, they are likely to associate his name with “sphere sovereignty.” This concept first gained prominence during the seven-decade political struggle in the Netherlands to allow parents to select schools corresponding to their religious convictions. • Is sphere sovereignty still relevant? And, indeed, is Kuyper still relevant, except as an example of a statesman/theologian? • Can his ideas help us find our way in the present confusing moment in political and social life in this and other Western democracies? • How do they illuminate the profound divisions so apparent in the recent elections, and can they offer a way forward? I will argue that, in fact, they do offer a principled approach to policy-making, especially in my own field of education. Despite obvious differences, the present situation in the United States – and indeed in the Netherlands and other European countries – shares with the period when Kuyper began to be influential a significant feature: popular revulsion against the condescension and intolerance of a Liberal elite toward the values and interests of many of their fellow-citizens. A primary locus of this conflict, in nineteenth-century Netherlands (and Belgium and France, Germany and Spain) as in twenty-first century United States, was public schooling. The situation came to a boil in 1878, when a new generation of Dutch Liberals came to power, committed to government intervention in popular schooling and explicitly hostile to confessional schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Calvinism” Is an Expression Which Was First Used by Max Weber in His Contributions to the Sociology of Religion
    Christian Social Thought in the Dutch Neo-Calvinist Tradition Bob Goudzwaard From: Walter Block and Irving Hexham (eds) Religion, Economics and Social Thought: Proceedings of an International Conference Vancouver, Fraser Institute 1986 pp. 251-279 (Chapter Seven). “Neo-Calvinism” is an expression which was first used by Max Weber in his contributions to the sociology of religion. He used it to describe the revival of the social and political teachings of John Calvin which took place, especially in the Netherlands, during the last part of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries. The roots of that revival lie mainly in the so-called Réveil movement, which had its origin in the first half of the nineteenth century in Protestant - not only Calvinistic - circles in Switzerland. That movement stressed the significance of a living Christian faith: biblical studies, and prayer for the reformation of the Church and the renewal of society. The most important Dutch representative of that Réveil was Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer (1801- 1876). Deeply influenced by German thinkers Von Haller and Julius Stahl, who were primarily within the Romantic tradition, Groen gradually developed his own approach to the social and political problems of his time, although he always remained a true “son of the Réveil!” His main published work was a major study of the spirit of the French Revolution, Unbelief and Revolution. He saw the Revolution and its ideals as the driving force behind the modern unbelief of his age. However, Abraham Kuyper (1837-1920) must be seen as the founding father of Dutch neo-Calvinism.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Dissertation.Pdf
    VU Research Portal Framing the hijab Lettinga, D.N. 2011 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Lettinga, D. N. (2011). Framing the hijab: The governance of intersecting religious, ethnic and gender differences in France, the Netherlands and Germany. VU University Amsterdam. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Framing the hijab The governance of intersecting religious, ethnic and gender differences in France, the Netherlands and Germany 1 Thesis committee : Prof.dr. Han Entzinger Prof.dr. Birgit Sauer Prof.dr. Thijl Sunier Prof.dr. Mieke Verloo Dr. Chia Longman Dr. Marcel Maussen ISBN: 978-90-5335-424-7 Printed by: Ridderprint Offsetdrukkerij BV, Ridderkerk Lay out cover page: Dennis Schuivens © D.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuyper and Apartheid: a Revisiting
    Kuyper and Apartheid: A revisiting Patrick Baskwell (Brandon, Florida, USA)1 Research Associate: Department of Dogmatics and Christian Ethics University of Pretoria Abstract Was Abraham Kuyper, scholar, statesman, and university founder, the ideological father of Apartheid in South Africa? Many belief so. But, there are others, amongst them George Harinck of the Free University in Amsterdam, who don’t think so. The article argues that there is an element of truth in both opinions. Kuyper did exhibit the casual racism so characteristic of the Victorian era, with its emphasis on empire building and all that it entailed. Kuyper was also directly responsible, ideologically, for the social structure in the Netherlands known as “verzuiling” or “pillarization” in terms of which members of the Catholic, Protestant, or Socialist segments of society had their own social institutions. This pillarizing, or segmenting, of society was, however, always voluntary. This is not true of the pillarizing or segmenting of South African society known as Apartheid. While there are similarities between Apartheid and “verzuiling”, especially in their vertical partitioning of the individual’s entire life, the South African historical context, the mediation of Kuyper’s ideas through South African scholars, the total government involvement, and therefore, the involuntary nature of Apartheid, point to their inherent dissimilarity. Apartheid was simply not pure Kuyper. Hence, while the effects of Kuyper’s ideas are clearly discernable in Apartheid policy, the article aims at arguing that Kuyper cannot be considered the father of Apartheid in any direct way. 1. INTRODUCTION In a recent article, George Harinck, director of the Historisch Documentatiecentrum voor het Nederlands Protestantisme (1800-current) at the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, describes the beginnings of his research for a book on Abraham Kuyper.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday Evening Keynote Address Mark A
    Friday Evening Keynote Address Mark A. Noll Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 5, Number 1 (Spring 2002), 137–156 Copyright © 2002 A Century of Christian Social Teaching: The Legacy of Leo XIII and Mark A. Noll Abraham Kuyper Wheaton College Looking back as we can now, at the end of the twentieth century, to the end of the nineteenth century, we are able to see much more clearly why the Christian social teachings of Abraham Kuyper and Leo XIII were themselves so insight- ful.1 It is not just that the pope’s Rerum Novarum of 1891 and the many other social encyclicals of his long and distinguished pontificate were words in sea- son from and for a Catholic Church wracked by more than thirty-five years of revolution, strife over dogma, Kulturkampf, and local Italian crises. Nor was it only that Abraham Kuyper’s great lecture in November 1891 on “The Social Problem and the Christian Religion” or his consideration of “Calvinism and Politics” in his 1898 Stone Lectures at Princeton offered what was, for Protestants in the 1890s, that rarest combination of sensitivity to the dispos- sessed with fidelity to a confession. It was not only, to repeat, that these were timely interventions. They were also prescient pronouncements. Their address to current events contained foundational reasoning that has been profitably extrapolated during the century that followed and in conditions and circum- stances that no one in the 1890s could have foreseen. Of course, what Kuyper and the pope said was not flawless; each had his blindspots and his weak- nesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidiarily in Her/His Own Sphere. Women and Christian Politics1
    < é Subsidiarily in her/his own sphere. Women and Christian politics1 Bruce C. Weame Honorary Research Associate in Sociology Monash University AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected]. edu.au Abstract Subsidiarity in her/his own sphere. Women and Christian politics This article is a discussion of the attitude of Christian social thought to women. In 1891 two influential Christian documents addressed this issue. Pope Leo XW's Rerum Novarum and Abraham Kuyper’s Het sociaale vraagstuk der Christelijke religie were responses to industrialization and subsequent Christian responses to feminism have had to face the legal, cultural and political aspects of the enhanced female participation in commerce which assumes equality for all consumers in the market-place. Catholic and Protestant political initiatives in Europe in the early 20th century, in line with these two approaches, assumed that the vocation of Christian women, inside and outside the domestic sphere, has to be that of a bulwark against materialism and liberalism. In line with this point o f view they helped to counter the domination of market-place values over all spheres of social life. These documents are also part o f latter-day efforts to reconsider women’s place. Female involvement in industry and public life around the world increases unabated as "affirmative action ” re-structures the public status of women. The ambiguous legacy of "economic rationalism " poses new threats since the burden of social welfare falls again onto the shoulders of overworked women. A sociological account which would be Christian must address historical, social and economic ambiguities. This article explores the issue, noting typical ways in which these two prominent Christian contributions will be interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • “This World Is Not My Home”: Richard Mouw and Christian Nationalism
    religions Article “This World Is Not My Home”: Richard Mouw and Christian Nationalism Aaron Pattillo-Lunt Spring Arbor University, Spring Arbor, MI 49283, USA; [email protected] Academic Editors: Mark T. Edwards and Christine A. James Received: 6 November 2016; Accepted: 23 December 2016; Published: 27 December 2016 Abstract: American evangelicalism has often been punctuated by dual commitments to the United States and to God. Those commitments were strongest within politically conservative evangelicalism. Though representing a solid majority among professing evangelicals, conservatives could not speak for the movement as a whole. Politically progressive evangelicals, beginning in the 1960s, formed a dissenting opinion of the post-World War II revival of Christian nationalism. They dared to challenge American action abroad, noticeably during the Vietnam War. Their critique of Christian nationalism and conservative evangelicals’ close ties to the Republican Party led them to seek refuge in either progressive policies or the Democratic Party. A third, underexplored subgroup of evangelicalism rooted in reformed theology becomes important to consider in this regard. These reformed evangelicals sought to contextualize nationalism in biblical rather than partisan or political terms. This goal is championed well by Richard Mouw, resulting in a nuanced look at evangelical Christians’ difficult dual role as both citizens of the Kingdom of God and the United States. Keywords: evangelicalism; nationalism; Mouw; reformed; Calvinism; Kuyper; Biblicism 1. Introduction Evangelicalism is one of the most pervasive and dominant movements in United States’ history. Yet it has no cut and paste definition. It is diverse and adaptive. Despite this changeability, evangelicals can be loosely defined by their theological views.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldview, Sphere Sovereignty, and Desiring the Kingdom: a Guide for (Perplexed) Reformed Folk
    Volume 39 Number 4 Article 3 June 2011 Worldview, Sphere Sovereignty, and Desiring the Kingdom: A Guide for (Perplexed) Reformed Folk James K. A. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James K. A. (2011) "Worldview, Sphere Sovereignty, and Desiring the Kingdom: A Guide for (Perplexed) Reformed Folk," Pro Rege: Vol. 39: No. 4, 15 - 24. Available at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege/vol39/iss4/3 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at Digital Collections @ Dordt. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pro Rege by an authorized administrator of Digital Collections @ Dordt. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Editor’s Note: Dr. James K.A. Smith presented this paper at the ARIHE Symposium, November 5, 2010, at Redeemer University College, Ancaster, Ontario. Worldview, Sphere Sovereignty, and Desiring the Kingdom: A Guide for (Perplexed) Reformed Folk clast; it’s just that I’m enough of a newcomer to various conversations that I don’t always appreciate the sacrosanct status of “our” concepts. For example, I quickly learned that if you write a book on Christian education and offhandedly (and somewhat tongue-in-cheek) suggest even a temporary “moratorium” on the notion of “world- view,” you can expect some animated responses and festering suspicion.1 The villagers begin to get restless, so to speak, even if you thought you were a citizen of the village. This suspicion has character- ized some of the response to Desiring the Kingdom in Reformed quarters of Christian higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Dutch Reformed Communities' Coverage In
    RESEARCH ARTICLE REGULATING RELIGION E-JOURNAL Comparative analysis of Dutch Reformed communities’ coverage in Canadian mainstream and Reformed mass media. MARIA ALEKSEEVSKAIA PhD Candidate School of Sociological and Anthropological studies, University of Ottawa [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper is a comparative study of how Dutch Reformed communities self- represent themselves in their printed media and the ways these communities are covered in Canadian daily newspapers. The cases are chosen from 2005 KEYWORDS until 2016. This research demonstrates that mainstream media forms a 1. positive image of Dutch Reformed groups, although it seems dated because Dutch ethnicity, the majority of publications refer to the communities’ experience of post-war Canadian Calvinists, immigration and memories about World War II. Also, mainstream newspapers ethno-religious identity, do not provide the reader with clear comprehension of the social role that mass media, Christian Dutch Reformed communities play today. However, Reformed magazines give schools, vaccination. a deeper understanding of Canadian Reformed communities’ worldview, but their target audience is narrower, and, as a result, they cannot transform public perception of these religious groups. 1 May 2017 | religionanddiversity.ca ISSN 2291-3106 RESEARCH ARTICLE REGULATING RELIGION E-JOURNAL Introduction In the postwar decades, because of immigration, the profile of Canadian population has changed dramatically. The fourth largest ethnic group associated with postwar immigration is the Dutch. Approximately 200,000 people left the Netherlands for Canada between 1946 and 1990 (Schryer, 1998, p.1). Despite the fact that Dutch immigrants have common origins, it seems impossible to research them as a group that shares similar values and cultural peculiarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Session I Abraham Kuyper and Reformed Social Teaching
    Session I Abraham Kuyper and Reformed Peter S. Heslam James D. Bratt Social Teaching James C. Kennedy Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 5, Number 1 (Spring 2002), 11–33 Copyright © 2002 Prophet of a Third Way: The Shape of Kuyper’s Socio- Peter S. Heslam The London Institute for Political Vision Contemporary Christianity A century after Abraham Kuyper’s visit to the United States, the issue that dominated political discourse both in Northern Europe and in the United States was that of the so-called Third Way. This was reflected in a meeting that took place in Washington in the autumn of 1998 between Tony Blair and Bill Clinton, the serving governmental heads of the United Kingdom and the United States. It was a time of seemingly intractable crisis at the White House in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky affair, but the theme that pervaded the agenda of that meeting was that of a Third Way in politics, and it served to cement the Blair-Clinton relationship with bonds of solidarity. It even diverted the focus of media coverage of the United States president, which hitherto had been fixed on the unfolding scandal. Much debate ensured in the broadsheets as to what was meant by the term; was it a radical alternative to two opposing ideologies, one that bore no similarity to what it sought to replace? Or was it an amalgam of the best parts of each of them? Although Kuyper did not use the term, his sociopolitical vision was designed as a Third Way—an alterna- tive to the ideologies of individualism, on the one hand, and collectivism, on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhoudsopgave
    Inhoudsopgave Voorwoord 3 Inleiding 4 De Kaiser‐these 5 Problemen 6 Europa als ‘derde macht’ 7 Focus van deze bijdrage 8 Hoofdstuk 1: Achtergronden bij Kaiser 11 De oorsprong: Europese christendemocraten in het Interbellum 11 Na 1945 13 Structuur van de Europese instituties 17 Motivaties 18 Doelen 19 Hoofdstuk 2: Adenauers Europese geloofsbrieven 21 Globaal overzicht: van Interbellum tot Koude Oorlog 21 Wat is Europa? 23 Neerwaartse spiraal 26 Antiek en christelijk 29 Politieke functie van het christendom 31 Europa en democratie 33 Frans‐Duitse as 35 Dritte Macht 37 Hoofdstuk 3: De weg naar Rome 38 Westbindung of hereniging 38 Schumanplan en EGKS 39 Gelijkberechtiging 41 1 De onderhandelingen 42 Belangrijke Franse stappen 43 Junktim 44 6 november 1956 45 Overzeese gebieden 47 Dritte Macht 51 Conclusie 53 Bibliografie 58 2 Voorwoord Het masterprogramma ‘Internationale Betrekkingen in historisch perspectief’ is uiteindelijk een project geworden van tweeënhalf jaar. Door een extra master – Christian Studies – aan de faculteit Wijsbegeerte van de Vrije Universiteit en een twee jaar durend landelijk bestuurslidmaatschap van het CDJA, heeft de afronding van deze master lang op zich laten wachten. Met de scriptie ‘Wegen naar Rome’ komt er een einde aan een studententijd van bijna zeven‐en‐een‐half jaar: Hora est. In eerste instantie lag het in de lijn der verwachting dat ik een scriptie zou schrijven over het Arabisch‐Israëlische conflict. Ik had immers niet voor niets bij mevrouw dr. A.H.M. van Ginneken het onderzoeksseminar ‘Van Volkenbond tot VN’ gevolgd. In het voorjaar van 2007 stal ‘Europa’ echter mijn hart tijdens het schrijven van een essay over de Turkse toetreding bij dr.
    [Show full text]