DOCSLIB.ORG

AMMA-JMVH-October-20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Volume 27 Number 4 October 2019 Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health Rehabilitation in the Australian Defence Force RY ME A DI IT C L I Stress and Immune Mediators In The Canadian Armed Forces I N M E A N S A I S O S A C L I A 2019 AMMA Conference Abstracts A T R I T O S N U A IN C. The Journal of the Australasian Military Medicine Association SAVE the DATE AMMA 2020 Conference 8 – 11 OCTOBER Hotel Grand Chancellor Hobart, Tasmania Table of Contents Letter to the Editor ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 Original Articles Rehabilitation in the Australian Defence Force ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7 Stress and Immune Mediators In The Canadian Armed Forces: Association Between Basal Levels and Military Physical Performance 15 Case Study Upper Respiratory Tract Infection Symptoms as a Herald Sign of Metamizole-Induced Neutropenia 24 2019 AMMA Conference Abstracts ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 27 2019 Conference Poster Presentations ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 77 Ambulance arriving at 2GHB deployed in the field Courtesy of Colonel Murray Hayes, RAADC Volume 27 Number 4; October 2019 Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health EDITORIAL BOARD CDRE Andy Robertson, CSC, PSM (Editor in Chief) Associate Professor Martin Richardson (Deputy Editor) BRIG Anne Campbell CDRE Michael Dowsett Dr Helen Kelsall COL Prof Peter Leggat, AM Benjamin Mackie David Robertson Tyler C Smith, MS, PhD Dr Darryl Tong Jason Watterson Australasian Military Medicine Association PATRON STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES MAJGEN Charles New The Australasian Military Medicine Association is Surgeon General Australian Defence Force Reserves an independent, professional scientific organisation of health professionals with the objectives of: COUNCIL • Promoting the study of military medicine • Bringing together those with an interest in President GPCAPT (Retd) military medicine Geoff Robinson, NSC • Disseminating knowledge of military medicine Vice President Dr Nader Abou-Seif • Publishing and distributing a journal in military medicine Secretary Dr Janet Scott • Promoting research in military medicine Treasurer CAPT Ian Young Membership of the Association is open to doctors, Council Members CDRE Andrew Robertson dentists, nurses, pharmacists, paramedics and Dr Peter Hurly anyone with a professional interest in any of the Rachelle Warner disciplines of military medicine The Association is totally independent of the Australian Defence Force Past President Dr Greg Mahoney Public Officer Ms Paula Leishman JMVH is published by the Australasian Military Medicine Association 227 Collins Street Hobart Tas 7000 Australia Ph: +61 3 62347844 Email: [email protected] ISSN No. 1835-1271 Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health Editorial After the war The theme for this year’s AMMA conference is “After The Journal now has a new website - https://jmvhorg/ - the War: Repatriation, recovery and public health” with enhanced search capability and a full coverage The impetus for this theme was the realisation that of all the issues over the last 28 years I would 100 years ago, in 1919, our forebears were just encourage all our readers to visit the website to find coming to terms with the fact that the Great War, the articles of interests Podcasts are likely to be added War to end all Wars, was finally over Repatriation in 2020 The issue themes for 2020 are also listed, of service men and women back to Australia was a and I would encourage authors to submit articles on key focus of the government, as was the recovery Transition to Civilian Life (April 2020), Global Health from the economic and public hardships from the Security (July 2020) and Preparing for Conflict and war Rehabilitation of the 137,000 wounded was also Disaster (October 2020) a key focus To complicate this further, pandemic Our fourth issue of 2019 primarily addresses the influenza had spread around the world in the abstracts of papers presented at the 28th AMMA second half of 1918 and continued in 1919, with an Conference There are also three excellent articles estimated 100 million deaths While initial transport – a timely review of rehabilitation in the ADF, a of the personnel back to Australia, under the control review of stress mediators in military physical of Lieutenant General Monash, proceeded well, with performance and a salient respiratory disease case all troops largely home by September 1919, the other study We continue to get a good range of articles, key elements of the repatriation system were in their but other military and veterans’ health articles are infancy and progressed far more slowly The term always very welcome and we would encourage all our ‘Repat’ quickly acquired pejorative connotations in readers to consider writing on their areas of military some quarters, with soldiers venting their frustration or veterans’ health interest We would particularly in various papers A short story in the Sydney Mirror welcome papers based on the presentations at the observed that if Repat officials ‘had as much silk conference, but welcome any articles across the as they have method they wouldn’t have enough to broader spectrum of military health make a necktie for an ant’1 Given the sheer numbers involved, it is intersting to ponder how Australia Dr Andy Robertson, CSC, PSM would fare under similar circumstances 100 years Commodore, RANR later, even given the support systems that have Editor-in-Chief grown up over that period References: 1 Payton P ‘Repat’: A concise history of repatriation in Australia Department of Veterans’ Affairs; Canberra: 2018 Volume 27 Number 4; October 2019 Page 5 Letter to the Editor In reply to Dr Worswick’s article ‘Medical Officer is made from the Special Projects Office responsible Training – An Infantryman’s Perspective’ JMVH for procurement of the equipment, together with Vol 27, Number 3, as an Army Medical Level 2 CATC and the allocation of unit resources (time and Doctor from a similar Royal Australian Infantry personnel) to ensure bulk numbers of personnel are Corps background with non-regimental experience effectively trained in the new equipment system in Recruit, Officer and overseas training of foreign Concurrently, training institutions are targeted to forces, I can unequivocally say the training of the ensure it incorporates training for future throughput Army’s uniformed health workforce, when compared The Q system is trained in maintenance and repair to how well the Army trains its other members, is In contrast, in Health there is no plan, coordination not good, not average, not adequate… it is just poor or measured outcomes for iSTAT implementation overall The one exception being the Army School The same applies to countless other pieces of medical of Health ADF Medical Technician course currently equipment entering or have entered service – oxylog producing wonderfully trained clinicians to a ventilators, tempus pro, ultrasound, MRX, etc baseline level of competency Overall, the collective organisation, integration and By way of some simple examples, the Army Standing delivery of training to achieve individual competencies Instruction for Personnel (ASIP), Part 8 Chapter and to ensure there is a baseline competency for 9, mandates numerous civilian competencies a ‘how, when and for whom’ an effect is delivered eg deployable (to field or operations) Medical Level 2 understanding a weapon system function, pulling the Treatment Team Medical Officer, a Nursing Officer trigger at the right target and right time, is something in a treatment team and a Medical Technician in the rest of Army generally does exceptionally well… a treatment team must have Currently, there is except Health Other groupings with similar technical no discernible effort or output at Formation level requirements to health that straddle civilian and (17 Brigade) that controls resources to centrally military governance, think aeronautical engineering, supervise, coordinate, fund and deliver these are light years ahead of Health – boards of inquiry competencies to ensure the Army’s health workforce into previous catastrophic failures have forced them meets these mandated civilian competencies The to be net result is that very few, if any, clinicians posted to these roles have achieved the Army specified Doctor Worswick’s article into Army Medical requirements for its deployable health workforce Officer Training should not only prompt action for This is a poor outcome for our treated soldiers remediation of the training shortfalls for medical officers, particularly in the PGY1-4 space, given Furthermore, the iSTAT point of care biochemical a seismic change in the civilian medical PGY 1 test machine (complete with cartridges) has finally and 2 training environment from 20 years ago has made its way into Close Health Units so that post the foundation of the fellowship of emergency our deployable treatment teams can identify medicine, but also prompt organisational reform for reversible causes to inform treatment of cardiac development of a ‘training culture’ within the Army arrest in accordance with the ALS/ALS2 Australian health workforce more
Recommended publications
  • DOWN the VOICEPIPE Do You Here There!

    DOWN the VOICEPIPE Do You Here There!

    NAVY LEAGUE OF AUSTRALIA September 2018 WESTERN AUSTRALIA DIVISION Volume 2, Issue 9 DOWN THE VOICEPIPE do you here there! Subscriptions now due COMING UP HMAS STUART Executive meeting Mon- day 01st. October 1700 • HMAS Perth (I) Memorial Foundation Meeting Saturday 06th. October1100 • Federal AGM 26th.-27th October 1 Divisional News The new executive committee for the period 1st. July 2018 to 30th. June has been finalised. PRESIDENT Mr Peter Jarvis RAN RTD VICE PRESIDENT LEUT Brad Barrett ANC HON SECRETARY CMDR Jim O’Neill ANC RTD TREASURER LEUT Bill Gale OAM RAN RTD COMMITTEE Trevor Vincent RAN RTD Mason Hayman Jake Needham LEUT Darryl Dunlop ANC RTD CPO Tom Goodlich ANC The Foundation Committee of the HMAS PERTH (I) Memorial Foundation INC. TRUSTEES CAPT Angela Bond RANR CMDR Jim O’Neill ANC RTD Peter Jarvis RAN RTD Colin Bancroft PROJECT TEAM CAPT Angela Bond RANR CMDR Jim O’Neill ANC RTD Peter Jarvis RAN RTD LEUT Sally Hudson ANC LEUT Brad Barrett ANC Trevor Vincent RAN RTD LEUT Darryl Dunlop ANC RTD Ian Holthouse Wes Olsen Jake Needham Kaye Fuller LEUT Bill Gale OAM RAN RTD The AGM of the Navy League of Australia Western Australia Division was held on Wednesday August 29th. AS was attended by 30 members and invited guests. Including Guest speakers CAPT Brian Delamont RAN, CMDR Geoff Hurren ANC and Mr Noel Sweeney ffrom BAE Systems. 2 2 BAE Systems Australia welcomes third ANZAC class ship to Henderson September 10, 2018 SeaWaves September 10, 2018 – BAE Systems Australia has welcomed a third ANZAC class warship to its Henderson facility as part of the fleet upgrade to keep the ships in service until they are replaced by the Hunter class frigates.
  • No Longer a Middle Power: Australia's Strategy in the 21St Century

    No Longer a Middle Power: Australia's Strategy in the 21St Century

    Études de l’Ifri Focus stratégique 92 NO LONGER A MIDDLE POWER Australia’s Strategy in the 21st Century Andrew CARR September 2019 Defense Research Unit The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 979-10-373-0071-3 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2019 How to cite this publication: Andrew Carr, “No Longer a Middle Power: Australia’s Strategy in the 21st Century”, Focus stratégique, No. 92, Ifri, September 2019. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tel. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Focus stratégique Resolving today’s security problems requires an integrated approach. Analysis must be cross-cutting and consider the regional and global dimensions of problems, their technological and military aspects, as well as their media linkages and broader human consequences. It must also strive to understand the far reaching and complex dynamics of military transformation, international terrorism or post-conflict stabilization. Through the “Focus stratégique” series Ifri’s Security Studies Center aims to do so, offering new perspectives on the major international security issues in the world today.
  • Annual Report 2016

    Annual Report 2016

    BRUMBIES RUGBY ANNUAL 2016REPORT TABLE OF SUPER RUGBY 2016 CONTENTS 22 RESULTS President’s Report ................................................................................................. 1 Chairman’s Report ................................................................................................ 2 2016 ACTRU Award Winners ........................................................................... 4 Patrons & Honour Roll ......................................................................................... 6 Office Bearers and Officials .............................................................................. 7 General Manager - Commercial Operations Report .............................. 10 Valedictories ..........................................................................................................13 Team Manager’s Report ....................................................................................15 Super Rugby 2016 Results................................................................................16 University of Canberra Vikings ......................................................................34 General Manager - Community Rugby Report ........................................38 Griffins Report ..................................................................................................... 40 Player Development ...........................................................................................41 42 ACT Club Rugby 2016 .......................................................................................43
  • Melanesia a Matrix Game of Great Power Competition in the South Pacific

    Melanesia a Matrix Game of Great Power Competition in the South Pacific

    Trouble in Paradise II: Melanesia A Matrix Game of Great Power Competition in the South Pacific Special thanks to Mr. Deon Canyon of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (APCSS) and Major William Duncan of U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) for their design input. Thanks to the following consultants and playtesters: Dr. Dawn Alexandrea Berry; Lieutenant Colonel Masashi Kagiwada, Japanese Army LNO to USARPAC; Major Kellie Landauer, USARPAC; Mr. Kinsey McFadden, USARPAC; Mrs. Sally Timbs, Australia Consul, Defence Policy, Honolulu; Major Daniel Young, USARPAC. The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. The relations between China and Pacific island countries are now better than ever and face important opportunities of development. China will work with Pacific island countries to brave the wind and waves and set sail for a brighter future of our relations. -Chinese President Xi, November 2018 Overview Melanesia is a Matrix Game designed to introduce players to the Melanesia region, its major actors and its most important dynamics. It is the second title in a series of Matrix Games on Oceania using the same core rules as the previous title, Micronesia. An overview of the Melanesia region follows in the next section (references to the game Melanesia will be italicized). The major actors represented in the game (either as player countries or through game design) are the Melanesian minor powers: the Autonomous Region of Bougainville, Fiji, New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea (PNG), the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, and West Papua; and the major regional powers: Australia, China, Indonesia, New Zealand, Taiwan, and the United States.
  • Evaluating Australian Army Program Performance 106

    Evaluating Australian Army Program Performance 106

    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Purdue Libraries and School of Information Research Studies 4-14-2020 Australian National Audit Office:v E aluating Australian Army Program Performance Bert Chapman Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs Part of the Accounting Commons, Accounting Law Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Information Literacy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, National Security Law Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Political Economy Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Economics Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Bert Chapman. "Australian National Audit Office:v E aluating Australian Army Program Performance." Security Challenges, 16 (2)(2020): 106-118. Note: the file below contains the entire journal issue. This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Security Challenges Vol. 16 No. 2 2020 Special Issue Plan B for Australian Defence Graeme Dobell John Blaxland Cam Hawker Rita Parker Stephen Bartos Rebecca Strating Mark Armstrong Martin White Bert Chapman Security Challenges Vol. 16 / No. 2 / 2020 Security
  • Forward Operating Bases: Is There a Place for Them in Australia's New

    Forward Operating Bases: Is There a Place for Them in Australia's New

    CONTRIBUTED ESSAY Forward operating bases: is there a place for them in Australia’s new defence strategy? D. R. Leece and I. M. C. Wolfe Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, New South Wales1 Australia’s defence posture has been refocused on our immediate region, but with the intent of holding any potential enemy forces as far from the Australian mainland as is practicable. A similar strategy in World War II saw Australia deploying operating bases in the Indonesian-Melanesian archipelago. This paper examines that experience, compares more successful with less successful uses of forward bases [Norfolk Island is used as an example of the former], and seeks to draw enduring lessons from that experience for Australia’s current defence. A principle of the defence phase of war is ‘defence this context, it is instructive to revisit our World War II in depth’ i.e. defending key terrain as far forward and to experience. This essay will provide geostrategic context the flanks of one’s main defensive position as is for, and examine the effect of, establishing forward practicable via disposition of forces and firepower, with operating bases in the archipelago to Australia’s north a view to surveilling one’s approaches, gaining early and east during the war. It will seek to establish what warning and time/space for manoeuvre, and imposing worked well and what was less successful, and then delay and attrition on the enemy before he reaches the draw enduring lessons from that experience for main defensive position (Australian Army 1977: 8-2).
  • It's War on Tahs for Brumbies

    It's War on Tahs for Brumbies

    48 RUGBY UNION SATURDAY JULY 26 2014 Finals frontier new territory as pressure hits home THE Waratahs haven’t lost a W a r a t a h s nitely been in this environ- minor premiership, which has It’s war on game at home all season – a re- skipper Mi- ment before and it’s got to allowed the players to iron out cord they are determined to chael Hooper, count for something. any minor niggles. protect against fierce rivals the who leads the “We’ve got guys who But Hooper admits he Brumbies in the most import- side in the ab- haven’t been here before, but would have preferred to keep ant game of their season. sence of Dave you’ve got to do it at some the momentum going. But it’s a new challenge for Dennis, says the all-Australian point if you want to be contest- With home ground advan- Tahs for many of them. decider against his former club ing for the final. tage, the Waratahs go into the While the Brumbies are in is the biggest Super Rugby “We feel we deserve to be game as clear favourites. their second consecutive finals game of his career. here and we’ve played really However, Hooper insists campaign, the last time the “A lot of guys will be in the well in the last weeks.” the pressure is no more intense Waratahs made the playoff’s same situation,” he said. The Waratahs enjoyed a than it has been all season with Brumbies was back in 2011.
  • Department of Defence – Hearing Date: 24 October 2018; Due Date for Answers: 7 December 2018

    Department of Defence – Hearing Date: 24 October 2018; Due Date for Answers: 7 December 2018

    Department of Defence – Hearing date: 24 October 2018; Due date for answers: 7 December 2018 Proof Portfolio Written Hansard QNo Senator BroadTopic QuestionText Hansard Page 1. During a hearing of the Senate Economics References Committee’s Inquiry into the Future of Naval Shipbuilding on 7 June 2018, I asked Ms Lisa Paul what specialist skills or specialist requirements of shipbuilding would be addressed by the new Naval Shipbuilding IRC or the Naval Shipbuilding College that are not covered by any one of four existing industry reference bodies. Ms Paul’s answer was that it was “a question worth asking the College”. She went on to say, in relation to specific skills gaps, that “the evidence from our shipbuilding colleagues on the board would be that there may be gaps in some areas, both in vocational education and in higher education.” In response to a question about skills not covered by the work of the existing IRCs, Ms Paul responded: “One of the things that actually impressed me a lot about the set-up of the college is the way that they are going about doing their gap analysis. I have not so much been concerned that the existing governance in vocational education and training can cope with it; I've been concerned that someone do a gap analysis to make sure that all the trades and all the higher education areas will be covered. I'm not so interested, as long as someone's doing it. The thing that I've been concerned about with the college is whether there is going to be a good gap analysis done of what exists.
  • Newsletter Office@Rusinsw.Org.Au Issue No

    Newsletter [email protected] Issue No

    Anzac Memorial, Hyde Park Royal United Services Institute for South, Sydney NSW 2000 1 Defence and Security Studies, NSW Inc PO Box A778 SYDNEY SOUTH NSW 1235 www.rusinsw.org.au Newsletter [email protected] Issue No. 46 – December 2018 Telephone: (02) 8262 2922 Introduction Welcome to this month’s issue of the electronic newsletter of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies NSW, the aim of which is to provide members, stakeholders, and other interested parties up to date news of our latest activities and events as well as selective information on defence issues. There is no charge to receive this newsletter electronically and recipients are not required to be a member of the Institute. Invite your colleagues to receive this newsletter by going to the newsletter page on the Institute’s website http://www.rusinsw.org.au/Newsletter where they can register their email contact details. Upcoming Institute Lunchtime Lectures and Social Events Tuesday 11 December 2018 Speaker: Mr Paul Kelly, Editor-at-Large on The Australian Sir Hermann Black Lecture ‘The End of World War 1’ Paul Kelly is Editor-at-Large on The Australian. Paul writes on Australian politics, public policy and international affairs. Paul has covered Australian governments from Gough Whitlam to Malcolm Turnbull. He is a regular television commentator on Sky News. He is the author of nine books including the End of Certainty on the politics and economics of the 1980’s, Triumph and Demise on the Rudd-Gillard era and The March of Patriots, providing a re-interpretation of Paul Keating and John Howard in office.
  • Report on the Review Into the Treatment of Women at the Australian Defence Force Academy

    Report on the Review Into the Treatment of Women at the Australian Defence Force Academy

    Report on the Review into the Treatment of Women at the Australian Defence Force Academy Phase 1 of the Review into the Treatment of Women in the Australian Defence Force © Australian Human Rights Commission 2011. This work is protected by copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be used or reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Australian Human Rights Commission. Enquiries should be addressed to Communications Unit at: [email protected] ISBN 978-1-921449-23-9 Acknowledgements The Australian Human Rights Commission thanks the following people: Review Panel: Commissioner Elizabeth Broderick (Chair), Ms Samantha Mostyn, Mr Mark Ney, Dr Damian Powell Review Secretariat: Director: Alexandra Shehadie, Research Director: Marlene Krasovitsky, Executive Officer: Natasha de Silva, Lawyer: Jennifer Whelan Research Team: Elena Campbell, Michael Edwards, Patrick Haid, Tanaya Roy, Jane Seymour, Kylie Stephen Support Team: Elsa Chen, Sarah Haid, Renuka Peiris, Elizabeth Prior, Marcie Richards Consultants: Dr Stephen Mugford, Mr David Tan This publication can be found in electronic format on the Australian Human Rights Commission’s website at: http://www.humanrights.gov.au/defencereview For further information about the Australian Human Rights Commission please visit www.humanrights.gov.au or email: [email protected] You can also write to: Communications Unit Australian Human Rights Commission GPO Box 5218 Sydney NSW 2001 Design and layout Jo
  • Regional Responses to US-China Competition In

    Regional Responses to US-China Competition In

    Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific Australia and New Zealand Michael S. Chase, Jennifer D. P. Moroney C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4412z1 For more information on this series, visit www.rand.org/US-PRC-influence Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0552-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: globe: jcrosemann/GettyImages; flags: luzitanija/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report on Australia and New Zealand is part of a project examining the perspectives of U.S.
  • Site Development Area

    Site Development Area

    AECOM Lombrum Offshore Processing Centre Expansion Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Site Development Area Revision – 04-Oct-2013 Prepared for – Sinclair Knight Mertz Pty Ltd – ABN: 37 001 024 095 541,000 541,200 541,400 541,600 Figure 2 - Lombrum Point LEGEND Hardstand Site 3 Greenfields South Fisheries Greenfields Site 1 Hardstand Site 1 Hardstand Site 2 Port Central Hardstand Site 1 9,774,600 Greenfields Site 1 Hardstand Site 3 Hardstand Site 2 Greenfields South 9,774,400 Port Central DATA SOURCES PNGDF Quickbird DigitalGlobe 25/07/08 Fisheries ° 0 50 Metres 9,774,200 [ GDA94 | MGA Zone 55 ] 1:3,500 @ A4 Manus Island - PNGDF Lombrum Point Melbourne Spatial Team - Prepared by : [AB] Checked by : [CC] 30 Sep 2013 | I:\BAIF\Projects\BA24413\Technical\Spatial\ArcGIS\Manus_Site_Visit\Lobrum_Point_A4.mxd MESS LOMBRUM OPC1 - (1200) PNGDF ACCOMM. PNGDF OVAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PNGDF E BASE N TR Y PNGDF WORKSHOPS & STORES LOMBRUM OFFSHORE PROCESSING CENTRE 2 - (800) POWER HOUSE PNGDF MAGAZINE STAFF ACCOMMODATION S E S C C A R O A D I N A M LANDING LOGISTICS LANDING SECURITY FENCE PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR REVIEW 1:1250 @ A1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60m 1020 C O P Y R I G H T MANUS ISLAND LOMBRUM POINT OPC2 FACILITY ZONE PLAN N SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PTY. LTD. A.C.N 001 024 095 PROJECT NO: SB20334 DATE: 24 SEPT 2013 PROJECT DIRECTOR: DESIGN REVIEW: REVISION: P2 LEVEL 11, 452 FLINDERS STREET TELEPHONE +61 3 8668 3000 MELBOURNE, VIC 3000 FACSIMILE +61 3 8668 3001 DRAWING NO: SD001 SCALE@A1: 1 : 1250 PROJECT MANAGER: TR DESIGN CHECK: GP AMENDMENT: PJ AUSTRALIA www.globalskm.com 24/09/2013 3:42:22 PM AECOM Lombrum Offshore Processing Centre Expansion Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix B Manus Island Heritage Assessment Revision – 04-Oct-2013 Prepared for – Sinclair Knight Mertz Pty Ltd – ABN: 37 001 024 095 AECOM Lombrum Offshore Processing Centre Expansion B-1 Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix B Manus Island Heritage Assessment Manus Prehistory Manus Island is the largest island among the approximately 70 islands that make up the Admiralties group.