Varieties of Authenticity in Contemporary Jewish Identity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Varieties of Authenticity in Contemporary Jewish Identity [133] Contempo- Varieties of Authenticity rary Jewish Identity in Contemporary Jewish • Identity Stuart Z. Charmé Stuart Z. Charmé uch discussion about religious pluralism among Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews, about assimilation and Jewish conti- Mnuity, about Jewish life in Israel and in the Diaspora, and about a variety of other issues related to Jewish identity all invoke “authenticity” as the underlying ideal and as the ultimate legitimizer (or de-legitimizer) of various positions. In an address to the graduating class of Reconstructionist rabbis in 1983, Irving Howe encouraged the next generation of rabbis to “try for an atmosphere of authenticity, wherever you find yourselves.”1 An Orthodox rabbi in Philadelphia recently encouraged liberal Jews to share a Sabbath meal at an Orthodox home in order to see “how special an authentic Shabbas really is.”2 Israel, claimed Daniel Elazar, is “the only place in the world where an authentic Jewish culture can flourish (at least potentially). Even the more peripheral of American Jews are touched by the Jewish authenticity of Israel, while the more committed find the power of Israel in this respect almost irresistible.”3 And in response to such typical Zionist authenticity claims, one of Philip Roth’s literary alter egos proposes that Europe, not Israel, is “the most authentic Jewish homeland there has ever been, the birthplace of rabbinic Judaism, Hasidic Judaism, Jewish secularism, socialism, on and on.”4 Authenticity has become the key term for postmodern reconstruc- tions and “renewals” of Jewish identity. As feminist, progressive, gay/ lesbian, environmentalist, secular, and many other kinds of Jews lay claim to parts of traditional Judaism that offer recognition and respect to the previously marginalized parts of their identities, they also seek elements that they consider to be “authentically Jewish.”5 Thus Tikkun editor Michael Lerner argues that authentic Jewish identity must be “more spiritual; moral; God-centered; politically committed to social [134] justice; pluralistic; democratic; nonsexist; joyful; full of intellectual ferment; and open to dissent”6 than is allowed by either Jewish secular- Jewish ism or unquestioned adherence to tradition. Alan Dershowitz pleads for Social more fluid understandings of Jewish authenticity that allow one to say Studies that Yiddish secularism was “an authentic Jewish culture,” that political Zionism is “an authentic Jewish civilization,” and that Dershowitz’s own secular Judaism is “equally authentic to that of the ultra-Orthodox.”7 Why has the term “authentic” become such an important qualifier of Jewish identity, tradition, culture, and religion? In what sense is it possible to describe a Jewish person, place, practice, or ideological position as valid, real, or authentic? This article will analyze some of the historical and cultural roots of the idea of authenticity in general and how different conceptions of authenticity are or might be applied to Jewish identity, culture, and tradition. References to authenticity constitute a hybrid discourse, one that makes descriptive claims about historical continuity with particular tradi- tions of the past as a source of authority for the present (e.g., “halakhic Judaism is more authentically Jewish than liberal [non-halakhic] Juda- ism”), prescriptive claims about the normative superiority of one form of Jewish life over another (e.g., “religiously observant Jews have more authenticity than assimilated, ethnic Jews,” or “Jewish life in Israel is more Jewishly authentic than Jewish life in the Diaspora”), and existential claims about one’s deepest values and sense of self.8 At times the pre- scriptive claim of authenticity presumes descriptive claims about the legitimate Jewish past. For example, the normative superiority of one form of Jewish practice may be defended by appeals to its historical authenticity. At other times, claims of Jewish authenticity require con- testing elements of the received tradition, as in many feminist quests for an authentic nonsexist or inclusive Judaism. The search for Jewish authenticity may be in the service of modern individualistic goals of searching for meaning and achieving some form of self-actualization, or authenticity may be linked to a collective agenda, such as when forms of Jewish identity that encourage or preserve group survival are regarded as more authentic than less durable individualistic or assimilationist forms of identity. It is clear that many of the various uses of the idea of authenticity are incompatible with each other. One of the first questions that arises in exploring the issue of “authentic Jewish identity” is whether the authen- ticity aimed at refers to the Jewish content of identity or to an existential quality in the structure of a Jewish person’s identity—that is, whether “authentic” modifies “Jewish” or whether it modifies “identity.” What is the relationship between “authentic” Jewish traditions and a Jew’s per- sonal sense of “authenticity”? British chief rabbi Jonathan Sacks con- [135] tends that authenticity in the modern existential sense of determining one’s own values out of a commitment to being true to oneself, rather Contempo- than accepting external authority, is “the archetypal biblical vice.” Thus rary Jewish Identity “from the perspective of the autonomous self, halachic existence is inauthentic because it flees from making personal choice the center of • Stuart Z. the universe. From the perspective of tradition, much of contemporary Charmé ethics is inauthentic precisely because it makes personal choice the measure of all things.” Sacks finds the incompatibility between Ortho- dox and liberal Judaism located in the shift in authenticity from being a characteristic of Judaism to a quality of the self.9 Although this change in the meaning of authenticity to Jews is critical, Sacks presents the two competing elements—tradition vs. the autonomous self—as individually far less problematic than each one really is. Essentialistic Authenticity At the descriptive level, authenticity is often invoked when referring to the Jewish content in a person’s life. In other words, to call someone an “authentic” Jew may be a statement about the depth of their Jewish knowledge, observance, or commitment. On this scale, contemporary Jews frequently regard Orthodox Judaism as the most authentic repre- sentation of the Jewish tradition of the past and Orthodox Jews as the most authentic embodiment of that tradition. When Adin Steinsaltz, an Orthodox rabbi in Israel, called secular Jews “empty sausages that only have the skin left,” he was asserting a view of the real essence or “meat” of authentic Jewish identity. Claims of authenticity are often used by some Orthodox Jews to invalidate or “de-authenticate” other forms of Jewishness. Of course, in the past decade, romanticization of Orthodoxy has been tempered by resentment at Orthodox triumphalist denigra- tion of non-Orthodox Jews. In a survey of American Jews in 1989, when debate in Israel on the “Who is a Jew?” question had thrown the authenticity of non-Orthodox Judaism into doubt, only 18 percent agreed that Orthodox Jews were “the most authentic Jews.”10 Still, a whole range of Jewish religious leaders promote the return to Jewish religious tradition as the only path—not just to Jewish continuity but also to Jewish authenticity. In its basic form, this model of associating authentic Jewish identity with the essence of Jewish tradition is rooted in the German romantic idea of volksgeist, or “spirit of a people,” which treats an ethnic, national, or religious group as a distinct species with its own unique cultural [136] outlook to which it tries to remain true. Each member of the group is simply an instance of the shared common body of cultural, religious, Jewish and national traditions. This perspective can be traced back to the Social eighteenth-century German philosopher J. G. Herder, who emphasized Studies the historical nature of reason: the idea that thought itself takes on different forms in different peoples as a result of their different cultures, geographies, and languages.11 Such essentialistic models of authenticity are attractive to all those who are troubled by the most difficult problem of identity: its fluid, shifting, overlapping, and intersecting boundaries. It is easier to see oneself as an expression of a group identity that pre-exists one’s birth and continues after one’s death. Anthropologists Richard Handler and Jocelyn Linnekin point out that “to imagine the collectivity as a species eliminates the problem of fuzzy boundaries: people can claim that any individual is or is not a member of the nation. There are no ambigu- ous or divided affiliations, and the nation, as a collection of individuals, is as definitively bounded as a natural species.”12 Tradition is the collective expression of a group’s essence, or volksgeist. Accordingly, authenticity is often associated with loyalty to a primordial and largely homogeneous tradition. Located in some idealized past, this tradition offers a means to resist the alienating and corrupting effects of other cultures or modern civilization in general. The glorification of tradition has often reflected an anxiety that the present moment or wider culture is fake and artificial, corrupted and alienating. Romantic reactions to the Enlightenment’s universalism held up the common folk or peasantry as the guardians of a cultural authenticity that was being lost in urban bourgeois society. The folk “harbored a spiritual essence that higher social classes had buried or lost in excessive civilization.”13 Seek- ing the shelter of tradition is to some degree symptomatic of “the destabilizing flux of the post-contemporary world.”14 Anthropologists have observed that the search for authentic indigenous cultures and artifacts has utilized the concept of authenticity to construct a boundary between modern Western culture and a pre-modern, pre-contact past representing what modern civilization has lost.15 The attraction to essentialistic models of Jewish authenticity is not limited to the very religious. Even secular Jews have claimed a sense of difference from non-Jews rooted in the Jewish volksgeist.
Recommended publications
  • A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism
    eSharp Issue 20: New Horizons A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism Eva van Loenen (University of Southampton) Introduction In this article, I shall examine the history of Hasidic Judaism, a mystical,1 ultra-orthodox2 branch of Judaism, which values joyfully worshipping God’s presence in nature as highly as the strict observance of the laws of Torah3 and Talmud.4 In spite of being understudied, the history of Hasidic Judaism has divided historians until today. Indeed, Hasidic Jewish history is not one monolithic, clear-cut, straightforward chronicle. Rather, each scholar has created his own narrative and each one is as different as its author. While a brief introduction such as this cannot enter into all the myriad divergences and similarities between these stories, what I will attempt to do here is to incorporate and compare an array of different views in order to summarise the history of Hasidism and provide a more objective analysis, which has not yet been undertaken. Furthermore, my historical introduction in Hasidic Judaism will exemplify how mystical branches of mainstream religions might develop and shed light on an under-researched division of Judaism. The main focus of 1 Mystical movements strive for a personal experience of God or of his presence and values intuitive, spiritual insight or revelationary knowledge. The knowledge gained is generally ‘esoteric’ (‘within’ or hidden), leading to the term ‘esotericism’ as opposed to exoteric, based on the external reality which can be attested by anyone. 2 Ultra-orthodox Jews adhere most strictly to Jewish law as the holy word of God, delivered perfectly and completely to Moses on Mount Sinai.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hebrew-Jewish Disconnection
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Master’s Theses and Projects College of Graduate Studies 5-2016 The eH brew-Jewish Disconnection Jacey Peers Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses Part of the Reading and Language Commons Recommended Citation Peers, Jacey. (2016). The eH brew-Jewish Disconnection. In BSU Master’s Theses and Projects. Item 32. Available at http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/32 Copyright © 2016 Jacey Peers This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. THE HEBREW-JEWISH DISCONNECTION Submitted by Jacey Peers Department of Graduate Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Bridgewater State University Spring 2016 Content and Style Approved By: ___________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Joyce Rain Anderson, Chair of Thesis Committee Date ___________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Anne Doyle, Committee Member Date ___________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Julia (Yulia) Stakhnevich, Committee Member Date 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my mom for her support throughout all of my academic endeavors; even when she was only half listening, she was always there for me. I truly could not have done any of this without you. To my dad, who converted to Judaism at 56, thank you for showing me that being Jewish is more than having a certain blood that runs through your veins, and that there is hope for me to feel like I belong in the community I was born into, but have always felt next to.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission of Collective Memory and Jewish Identity in Post-War Jewish Generations Through War Souvenirs
    heritage Article Transmission of Collective Memory and Jewish Identity in Post-War Jewish Generations through War Souvenirs Jakub Bronec C2DH—Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History, University of Luxembourg, Maison des Sciences Humaines 11, Porte des Sciences, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; [email protected] Received: 14 May 2019; Accepted: 30 June 2019; Published: 2 July 2019 Abstract: The article includes a sample of testimonies and the results of sociological research on the life stories of Jews born in the aftermath of World War II in two countries, Czechoslovakia and Luxembourg. At that time, Czechoslovak Jews were living through the era of de-Stalinization and their narratives offer new insights into this segment of Jewish post-war history that differ from those of Jews living in liberal, democratic European states. The interviews explore how personal documents, photos, letters and souvenirs can help maintain personal memories in Jewish families and show how this varies from one generation to the next. My paper illustrates the importance of these small artifacts for the transmission of Jewish collective memory in post-war Jewish generations. The case study aims to answer the following research questions: What is the relationship between the Jewish post-war generation and its heirlooms? Who is in charge of maintaining Jewish family heirlooms within the family? Are there any intergenerational differences when it comes to keeping and maintaining family history? The study also aims to find out whether the political regime influences how Jewish objects are kept by Jewish families. Keywords: Jewish family heirlooms; Jewish material culture; ritual items 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Synagogue for Interfaith Couples and Families
    GUIDE TO THE SYNAGOGUE FOR INTERFAITH COUPLES AND FAMILIES Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 What happens at a synagogue? ...................................................................................... 3 Daily Prayer ................................................................................................................. 4 Torah Reading ............................................................................................................. 5 Special Prayers For Holidays ...................................................................................... 6 Lifecycle Events (But Not All Of Them!) ....................................................................... 7 Study ........................................................................................................................... 9 Other Community Activities ....................................................................................... 10 What Kind of Synagogue Is it? Jewish Denominations ................................................. 11 Reform ................................................................................................................... 12 Conservative .......................................................................................................... 12 Orthodox ................................................................................................................ 14 Hasidic Orthodox ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES English Department Hasidic Judaism in American Literature by Eva van Loenen Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF YOUR HUMANITIES English Department Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy HASIDIC JUDAISM IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Eva Maria van Loenen This thesis brings together literary texts that portray Hasidic Judaism in Jewish-American literature, predominantly of the 20th and 21st centuries. Although other scholars may have studied Rabbi Nachman, I.B. Singer, Chaim Potok and Pearl Abraham individually, no one has combined their works and examined the depiction of Hasidism through the codes and conventions of different literary genres. Additionally, my research on Judy Brown and Frieda Vizel raises urgent questions about the gendered foundations of Hasidism that are largely elided in the earlier texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopian Jews in Canada: a Process of Constructing an Identity
    Ethiopian Jews in Canada: A Process of Constructing an Identity Esther Grunau Department of Anthropology McGill University, Montreal c November, 1995 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts, Anthropology. © Esther Grunau, 1995 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ll Abstract IV Chapter 1 : Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Historical Background 17 Chapter 3: Emigration out ofEthiopia 32 Chapter 4: The Construction of Group Identity in Israel 46 Chapter 5: The Canadian Experience 70 Conclusion Ill Appendix A: Maps 113 Appendix B: Ethiopian Jewish Informants 115 Appendix C: Glossary 118 Appendix D: Abbreviations 120 References Cited 121 11 Acknowledgments This thesis could not have been completed without the support and assistance of several individuals and organizations. My supervisor, Professor Allan Young, encouraged me throughout the M.A. program and my thesis to push myself intellectually and creatively. I thank him for his gu~dance, constructive comments and support through my progression in the program and the evolution of my thesis. Professor Ell en Corin carefully supervised a readings course on Ethiopian Jews and identity which served as the background for this thesis. Throughout my progression in the course and in the M. A. program she was always available to discuss ideas with me, and her invaluable comments and support helped me to gain focus and direction in my work. Dr. Laurence Kirmayer provided me with a forum to explore the direction of my thesis through my involvement in the Culture and Mental Health Team. His insightful comments on how to link cultural anthropology with mental health challenged me to think more clearly about my graduate work and my career.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Jewish Renewal?
    The Jewish Denominations A quick look at Reform, Conservative, Orthodox and Reconstructionist Judaism — and at other Jewish streams. By MJL Jewish denominations — also sometimes referred to as streams, movements or branches — are the principal categories of religious affiliation among American Jews. The denominations are mainly distinguished from one another on the basis of their philosophical approaches to Jewish tradition, and their degree of fidelity to and interpretation of traditional Jewish law, or halacha. Outside North America, the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism play a less significant role, and in Israel the vast majority of synagogues and other Jewish religious institutions are Orthodox, even though most Israeli Jews do not identify as Orthodox. Even within North America, the role of the movements has diminished somewhat in recent years, with growing numbers of American Jews and Jewish institutions identifying as “just Jewish,” nondenominational or transdenominational. The 3 Largest Jewish Movements Reform Judaism A participant marching with the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism in the Women’s March in Washington, Jan. 21, 2017. (Jason Dixson Photography/Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism via Flickr) The largest affiliation of American Jews, some 35 percent of Jews identify as Reform. The movement emphasizes the primacy of the Jewish ethical tradition over the obligations of Jewish law. The movement has traditionally sought to adapt Jewish tradition to modern sensibilities and sees itself as politically progressive and social-justice oriented while emphasizing personal choice in matters of ritual observance. Major institutions: Union for Reform Judaism, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institution of Religion, Religious Action Center, Central Conference of American Rabbis.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Power, a Religious Agenda, and the Failings of the Endorsement Test: Hasidic Educational Separatism and the East Ramapo School Board Kathleen Lockwood
    FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 12 | Issue 3 Article 6 3-1-2014 Political Power, a Religious Agenda, and the Failings of the Endorsement Test: Hasidic Educational Separatism and the East Ramapo School Board Kathleen Lockwood Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/falr Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Kathleen Lockwood, Political Power, a Religious Agenda, and the Failings of the Endorsement Test: Hasidic Educational Separatism and the East Ramapo School Board, 12 First Amend. L. Rev. 697 (2014). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/falr/vol12/iss3/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in First Amendment Law Review by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Political Power, a Religious Agenda, and the Failings of the Endorsement Test: Hasidic Educational Separatism and the East Ramapo School Board By Kathleen Lockwood* I. INTRODUCTION While presiding over the last meeting of the East Ramapo School Board before its summer break of 2012, Daniel Schwartz, a member of the Hasidic Jewish community of New Square, New York, and the controversial chairman of the Board, addressed criticism of the Board's alleged financial favoritism of yeshivas t at the expense of the public school system.2 In response to a suggestion that members of the Hasidic Jewish community were unfit to serve on the board because of their preference for private yeshivas over public schools, Schwartz remarked in a now infamous line: "You don't like it? Find yourself another place to live." 3 Schwartz's comment reflects what many believe to be the underlying rationale of the Board's actions since Rockland County's Hasidic Jewish population gained the majority of the Board seats in 2007-educational separatism for the Hasidic Jewish population at the expense of the surrounding minority populations.
    [Show full text]
  • CARLETON UNIVERSITY College of the Humanities: Religion Program RELI 2110 R: Judaism (Online and Fully Asynchronous) Winter 2021
    CARLETON UNIVERSITY College of the Humanities: Religion Program RELI 2110 R: Judaism (online and fully asynchronous) Winter 2021 Professor: Dr. Deidre Butler Email: [email protected] Online Office Hours: Online office hours Wednesdays 3:30-4:30 using Big Button meeting room on the course webpage. Also available for online and telephone appointments at other times. Please contact by email to book. Course Description: What do Jews believe? What makes a Jew a Jew? How do Jews practice their religion? This 2000 level online course explores Judaism as a diverse and always developing living tradition. In religious studies we understand religion as a human phenomenon that we study from a critical, historical, and evidence-based perspective. We think about Judaism as lived by humans in specific times and places, in particular cultural, social and political contexts, and in gendered bodies. We also want to understand what Jews have to say about themselves as a people, their own history, faith, and tradition. We will draw on sacred texts, art, films and case-studies from Canada and around the world to explore Judaism in contemporary and historical perspectives. Key themes will include: the diversity of Judaism; modern Jewish identity and status; tradition and modernity; sacred texts and contemporary practice; understandings of the divine and human role in Creation; Human nature; Ethics and values; religious law and observance; ritual practice such as lifecycle, and holidays and rituals; gender and sexuality; the Jew as Other, anti-Judaism, Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust; and Jewish religious perspectives on Israel (land, Zionism and state). There are no prerequisites for the course.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Donniel Hartman: Boundaries and Jewish Identity
    RABBI DONNIEL HARTMAN: BOUNDARIES AND JEWISH IDENTITY (Begin audio) HOLO: Welcome to the College Commons Bully Pulpit Podcast, Torah with a Point of View. Produced by the Hebrew Union College Jewish Institute of Religion, America’s first Jewish institution of higher learning. My name is Joshua Holo, your host, and Dean of the Jack H. Skirball campus in Los Angeles. It’s my great pleasure to welcome to the Bully Pulpit Podcast, Rabbi Dr. Donniel Hartman who is President of the Shalom Hartman Institute where he pioneered far reaching programs for scholars, educators, rabbis, and religious and lay leaders in both Israel and North America. He’s a prominent public intellectual in Israel and abroad. And in 2016 he published the highly regarded book Putting God Second, How to Save Religion from Itself. Rabbi Hartman, thank you for coming. It’s a pleasure to have you. HARTMAN: My pleasure to be here. HOLO: In doing some of the research for this interview, I checked out what appears to be the most recent video on your website. And it’s a presentation to the B’nai Jeshurun where you talk about boundaries, which is a theme that’s, of course, central to some of your writing. I was just curious, you made reference in that talk to intermarriage and I think you also made reference to the fact that B’nai Jeshurun’s seem to be in a moment of decision of its own. Was your talk part of a deliberative process whereby they were thinking about their policy on intermarriage? HARTMAN: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliyah and the Ingathering of Exiles: Jewish Immigration to Israel
    Aliyah and the Ingathering of Exiles: Jewish Immigration to Israel Corinne Cath Thesis Bachelor Cultural Anthropology 2011 Aliyah and the Ingathering of Exiles: Jewish immigration to Israel Aliyah and the Ingathering of Exiles: Jewish Immigration to Israel Thesis Bachelor Cultural Anthropology 2011 Corinne Cath 3337316 C,[email protected] Supervisor: F. Jara-Gomez Aliyah and the Ingathering of Exiles: Jewish immigration to Israel This thesis is dedicated to my grandfather Kees Cath and my grandmother Corinne De Beaufort, whose resilience and wits are an inspiration always. Aliyah and the Ingathering of Exiles: Jewish immigration to Israel Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 4 General Introduction ............................................................................................. 5 1.Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Anthropology and the Nation-State ........................................................................ 10 The Nation ........................................................................................................ 10 States and Nation-States ................................................................................... 11 Nationalism ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Identity After the Holocaust
    Jewish Identity after the Holocaust Excerpt from interview with Professor Yehuda Bauer Director of the International Center for Holocaust Studies of Yad Vashem January 18, 1998, Yad Vashem Jerusalem Interviewer: Amos Goldberg Q- What about Jewish identity – how was it influenced by the Holocaust? B- As far as Jewish identity is concerned, this is very complicated. Jews do not agree with each other about what their identity actually is – whether it is religious or ethnic, or ethnic-religious, to what proportions, what religion means to them, and so on. There is a great difference of opinion within the Jewish community, because there is no common interpretation of self. The Holocaust has had a tremendous impact on this, but the impact varies in different parts of the Jewish community. For some people, it is a call to return to Orthodox religious observance. For others, it is a call to integrate into the non-Jewish world to avoid such things from happening in the future. And for yet others, it is a combination of insisting on particularity and extending a hand outside to the general concern of humanity to oppose mass murder and genocide. For some, it is a political tool to achieve political ends. I think using the Holocaust as a political tool is an abomination, and it must never be done. For all of them, I think, it is something that concerns their very core as Jews. The Holocaust affects all those who were born either before, or during, the event (and their number, of course, is diminishing), and all the rest who were born afterwards.
    [Show full text]