DOCSLIB.ORG

N. 14 COP 1,2,3,4 Prova 2.Ai

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
N. 14 COP 1,2,3,4 Prova 2.Ai 14 2016 IL CAPITALE CULTURALE Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage JOURNAL OF THE SECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism University of Macerata Il Capitale culturale Fiorella Dallari, Stefano Della Torre, Maria Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage del Mar Gonzalez Chacon, Maurizio De Vita, Vol. 14, 2016 Michela Di Macco, Fabio Donato, Rolando Dondarini, Andrea Emiliani, Gaetano Maria ISSN 2039-2362 (online) Golinelli, Xavier Greffe, Alberto Grohmann, Susan Hazan, Joel Heuillon, Emanuele Invernizzi, Lutz Klinkhammer, Federico © 2016 eum edizioni università di macerata Marazzi, Fabio Mariano, Aldo M. Morace, Registrazione al Roc n. 735551 del 14/12/2010 Raffaella Morselli, Olena Motuzenko, Giuliano Pinto, Marco Pizzo, Edouard Pommier, Carlo Direttore Pongetti, Adriano Prosperi, Angelo R. Pupino, Massimo Montella Bernardino Quattrociocchi, Mauro Renna, Orietta Rossi Pinelli, Roberto Sani, Girolamo Co-Direttori Sciullo, Mislav Simunic, Simonetta Stopponi, Tommy D. Andersson, Elio Borgonovi, Michele Tamma, Frank Vermeulen, Stefano Rosanna Cioffi , Stefano Della Torre, Michela Vitali Di Macco, Daniele Manacorda, Serge Noiret, Tonino Pencarelli, Angelo R. Pupino, Web Girolamo Sciullo http://riviste.unimc.it/index.php/cap-cult e-mail Coordinatore editoriale [email protected] Francesca Coltrinari Editore Coordinatore tecnico eum edizioni università di macerata, Centro Pierluigi Feliciati direzionale, via Carducci 63/a – 62100 Macerata Comitato editoriale tel (39) 733 258 6081 Giuseppe Capriotti, Alessio Cavicchi, Mara fax (39) 733 258 6086 Cerquetti, Francesca Coltrinari, Patrizia http://eum.unimc.it Dragoni, Pierluigi Feliciati, Enrico Nicosia, [email protected] Valeria Merola, Francesco Pirani, Mauro Saracco, Emanuela Stortoni Layout editor Cinzia De Santis Comitato scientifi co - Sezione di beni culturali Giuseppe Capriotti, Mara Cerquetti, Francesca Progetto grafi co Coltrinari, Patrizia Dragoni, Pierluigi Feliciati, +crocevia / studio grafi co Maria Teresa Gigliozzi, Valeria Merola, Susanne Adina Meyer, Massimo Montella, Umberto Moscatelli, Sabina Pavone, Francesco Pirani, Mauro Saracco, Michela Scolaro, Emanuela Stortoni, Federico Valacchi, Carmen Vitale Comitato scientifi co Michela Addis, Tommy D. Andersson, Alberto Rivista accreditata AIDEA Mario Banti, Carla Barbati, Sergio Barile, Nadia Barrella, Marisa Borraccini, Rossella Rivista riconosciuta CUNSTA Caffo, Ileana Chirassi Colombo, Rosanna Rivista riconosciuta SISMED Cioffi , Caterina Cirelli, Alan Clarke, Claudine Cohen, Gian Luigi Corinto, Lucia Corrain, Rivista indicizzata WOS Giuseppe Cruciani, Girolamo Cusimano, Musei e mostre tra le due guerre a cura di Silvia Cecchini e Patrizia Dragoni Saggi «Il capitale culturale», XIV (2016), pp. 275-345 ISSN 2039-2362 (online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/1385 © 2016 eum Painting the National Portrait. Retrospectives of Italian and French Art in the 1930’s Kate Kangaslahti* Un portrait risque parfois de ressembler au modèle, il ressemble toujours au peintre. Paul Léon, Exhibition of French Art 1932, p. XIV Nous avons tenté aussi notre portrait de la France. Henri Focillon, Chefs d’œuvre de l’art français 1937, p. XIII Abstract In contrast to the museum, exhibitions, by virtue of their temporary nature, allow art to be mobilised in response to more immediate demands and, in the case of the travelling exhibition, export historical narratives of the nation abroad. This essays examines four * Kate Kangaslahti, research fellow Ku Leuven, Etienne Sabbelaan 53 - box 7656 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium, e-mail: [email protected]. 276 KATE KANGASLAHTI exhibitions of French and Italian art which took place in the decade before the Second World War: two in London, the “Exhibition of Italian Art” in 1930 and the “Exhibition of French Art” in 1932; and two in Paris, “L’Art italien de Cimabue à Tiepolo” in 1935 and the “Chefs d’œuvre de l’art français” in 1937. In comparing the shows – their organisation, contents, display and critical reception – my intention is to unpick the various political, art historical, even economic interests which sought to marshal art in these years. If the different faces these retrospectives presented were neither faithful nor scholarly refl ections, in each case the evocation of a distant past was a mirror that refl ected the divergent needs of the present. Contrariamente ai musei, la natura temporanea delle esposizioni permette all’arte di essere spostata in risposta a domande più immediate e, nel caso di esposizioni itineranti, di esportare narrative storiche della nazione all’estero. Questo saggio esamina quattro esibizioni d’arte francese e italiana che si sono tenute nel decennio che ha preceduto la Seconda Guerra Mondiale: due a Londra, “L’esposizione d’arte Italiana” del 1930 e “L’esposizione d’arte francese” del 1932; due a Parigi, “L’arte italiana da Cimabue a Tiepolo” del 1935 e “Capolavori dell’arte francese” del 1937. Dal confronto delle suddette – la loro organizzazione, i contenuti, l’esposizione e la critica – la mia intenzione è di discernere i fattori politici, artistici, ed anche economici che hanno spinto ha promuovere l’arte in questi anni. Se le varie sfaccettature che queste retrospettive hanno presentato non erano né fedeli e neppure rifl essioni erudite, in ogni caso l’evocazione di un distante passato era uno specchio che rifl etteva i divergenti bisogni del presente. On 7 December 1936, the directeur général des Beaux-Arts, Georges Huisman, assembled a distinguished group of scholars, curators and cultural functionaries to discuss plans for a vast retrospective of French art. The exhibition was a late addition to the programme for the Exposition internationale des arts et techniques dans la vie moderne in Paris the following year and the directive came from the Prime Minister, Léon Blum. The committee’s brief was two- fold: fi rstly, «to demonstrate the continuity of French art from its earliest beginnings»1; secondly, «to show the public an ensemble of works of art, the likes of which [had] never before been seen»2. Organised in admirable haste, the “Chefs d’œuvre de l’art français” (fi g. 1) opened at the newly built Palais de Tokyo on 26 June 1937 and excited great fanfare. The 1.340 works on display collectively offered, in the words of the Minister for National Education and Fine Arts, Jean Zay, «a census of our national artistic riches»3, a wealth all the more apparent because none of the masterpieces were from the nation’s greatest repository, the Louvre. The various paintings, drawings, sculptures and tapestries were drawn from provincial and foreign museums, from private collections at home and abroad, representing some ten centuries of work that 1 Paris, Archives Nationales, (henceforth AN), Sous-série Beaux-Arts, F/21/4082, organising committee meeting, 7 December 1936. 2 AN Sous-série Beaux-Arts, F/21/4729, letter from Georges Huisman to André François- Poncet, French Ambassador to Germany, 5 February 1937. 3 Chefs-d’œuvre de l’art français 1937, p. VIII. PAINTING THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT 277 had come, Blum noted with pride, «from all corners of the globe to attest to the eternal prestige of French art»4. More than merely the sum of these magnifi cent parts, the incontestable glory of le patrimoine here stood as a likeness for la patrie. As the eminent French scholar Henri Focillon declared in his introduction to the catalogue, «we have attempted too our portrait of France»5. Despite the lofty ambitions of the committee and the accolades which invariably greeted the display, the “Chefs d’œuvre de l’art français” was not an event without parallel or precedent. The art historian Louis Gillet attributed the speed with which organisers had assembled the show to their involvement in «the unforgettable exhibition at the Royal Academy»6 fi ve years earlier, when they had served on France’s offi cial delegation to the “Exhibition of French Art, 1200-1900” in 19327. Putting this experience to good use, the same learned team had doubled its efforts to ensure that «Paris [was] equal to London, and the Quai de Tokyo [was] every bit as good as, if not better than, Burlington House»8. The exhibition of French art in London was itself one of a number of ambitious national retrospectives that had taken place at the Royal Academy, including the equally memorable “Exhibition of Italian Art, 1200- 1900” in 1930. Then, precious works from many of Italy’s leading museums had graced the walls of Burlington House, to the delight of expectant crowds and the confi dent prediction of the English press that such an event would «not be robbed of its importance as a ‘gesture’ by repetition»9. Yet only fi ve years passed before this fi rst, spectacular manifestation of italianità was followed by a second, even greater display. In 1935, many more loans again arrived at the Petit Palais in Paris for “L’Art italien de Cimabue à Tiepolo”, where this time the French public enjoyed the privilege of beholding «the eternal face of Italy»10. Each of these never to be – but soon to be – repeated events, more than simply presenting a slice of French or Italian cultural heritage, rich though it was, were intended as embodiments of the national character. As scholars like Francis Haskell and Eric Michaud have shown, by the mid-nineteenth century European historians widely believed that the arts of a given society were the most reliable marker of its true complexion11; as a corollary, burgeoning scholarship devoted to the history of art studied individual objects according to “styles”, styles that were determined along national lines12. Other, now 4 Ivi, p. VI. 5 Ivi, p. XIII. 6 Gillet 1937, p. 274. 7 The various committees are listed in the respective catalogues. See Exhibition of French Art, 1200-1900 1932, pp. VI-XIII; and Chefs-d’œuvre de l’art français 1937, pp. XXVII-XXIX. 8 Gillet 1937, p. 274. 9 Italian Art Exhibition 1929, p. 12. 10 Ojetti 1935. 11 Haskell 1993, p. 217. 12 Michaud 2012, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Witches, Whores, and Virgin Martyrs: Female Roles in Seventeenth Century Opera Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9mj7d63c Author Richter, Terri Lynn Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Witches, Whores, and Virgin Martyrs: Female Roles in Seventeenth Century Opera A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Musical Arts in Music by Terri Lynn Richter 2017 Copyright by Terri Lynn Richter 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Witches, Whores, and Virgin Martyrs: Female Opera Roles in Seventeenth Century Opera by Terri Lynn Richter Doctor of Musical Arts in Music University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Juliana K. Gondek, Chair The fictional women presented to the public on the opera stages and in the noble houses of Italy during the seventeenth century did not resemble the societal feminine ideal of chastity, silence, obedience, and humility; on the contrary, they were strong-willed, eloquent, powerful, and sexually sentient. This dissertation will examine a few of the principal female characters from a selected number of early seventeenth-century operas and explore what these women represented in context of the patriarchal, highly misogynistic societies in which they were constructed. Furthermore, I will consider the implications of this information for issues of modern performance practice, and for the representation of these female characters in modern reproductions of the operas. Finally, I will discuss the influences of this research on my final DMA recital, a program of seventeenth-century arias and songs which personified the female stereotypes presented in this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTEPULCIANO's PALAZZO COMUNALE, 1440 – C.1465: RETHINKING CASTELLATED CIVIC PALACES in FLORENTINE ARCHITECTURAL and POLITI
    MONTEPULCIANO’S PALAZZO COMUNALE, 1440 – c.1465: RETHINKING CASTELLATED CIVIC PALACES IN FLORENTINE ARCHITECTURAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXTS Two Volumes Volume I Koching Chao Ph.D. University of York History of Art September 2019 ABSTRACT This thesis argues for the significance of castellated civic palaces in shaping and consolidating Florence’s territorial hegemony during the fifteenth century. Although fortress-like civic palaces were a predominant architectural type in Tuscan communes from the twelfth century onwards, it is an understudied field. In the literature of Italian Renaissance civic and military architecture, the castellated motifs of civic palaces have either been marginalised as an outdated and anti-classical form opposing Quattrocento all’antica taste, or have been oversimplified as a redundant object lacking defensive functionality. By analysing Michelozzo’s Palazzo Comunale in Montepulciano, a fifteenth-century castellated palace resembling Florence’s thirteenth-century Palazzo dei Priori, this thesis seeks to address the ways in which castellated forms substantially legitimised Florence’s political, military and cultural supremacy. Chapter One examines textual and pictorial representations of Florence’s castellation civic palaces and fortifications in order to capture Florentine perceptions of castellation. This investigation offers a conceptual framework, interpreting the profile of castellated civic palaces as an effective architectural affirmation of the contemporary idea of a powerful city-republic rather than being a symbol of despotism as it has been previously understood. Chapters Two and Three examine Montepulciano’s renovation project for the Palazzo Comunale within local and central administrative, socio-political, and military contexts during the first half of the fifteenth century, highlighting the Florentine features of Montepulciano’s town hall despite the town’s peripheral location within the Florentine dominion.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier Aveugles Pêcheurs
    Jacques Ofenbach Délyriades présente : Les deux aveugles Les deux pêcheurs avec Fabrice Maitre, ténor Jean-Noël Poggiali, ténor Fabrice Boulanger, piano Un peu d’histoire ! 2 aveugles, 2 pêcheurs, 2 chanteurs… Nous sommes au début de l’année 1855 et Paris prépare févreusement l’Exposition Universelle. Jacques Ofenbach, compositeur ayant des difcultés à se faire jouer, multiplie les démarches afn d’exploiter lui-même un théâtre mais le cadre de la réglementation est particulièrement stricte. Le 5 juillet, l’administration l’autorise à faire jouer des « scènes comiques et musicales dialoguées à deux ou trois personnages »… pas un de plus. Le théâtre des Boufes-Parisiens est né et avec lui une litanie de pièces – répondant strictement à cette contrainte – à deux ou trois personnages (et jusqu’à 5 danseurs au maximum). Parmi les pièces données lors de cette inauguration, « Les Deux Aveugles » fut portée aux nues par le public. Elle devait garder l'afche durant un an. Napoléon III la faisant même jouer aux Tuileries à l'occasion du Congrès de la Paix réuni à Paris. aujourd’hui contraintes budgétaires, créations de « petites formes »… XIXe ou XXIe siècle ? Aujourd’hui le spectacle vivant s’empare de nouveau de ce qu’il appelle des « petites formes » dans un contexte bien diférent et dont les raisons économiques sont une des motivations principales. Mais que nous apprennent donc ces « petites formes » du XIXe, dont certaines sont depuis devenues des pièces du répertoire et d’autres sont tombées dans l’oubli ? Au delà de la contrainte formelle de leur création, qu’ont-elles à nous dire aujourd’hui ? Nous avons donc associé le temps d’une soirée deux ouvrages écrits par Jacques Ofenbach pour deux ténors, chacune des pièces ayant son identité musicale propre et ses trouvailles particulières.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspective As Structured Memory in the Wake of the Great Plague of 1348
    Quart 2020, 3 PL ISSN 1896-4133 [s. 3-18] Perspective as structured memory in the wake of the Great Plague of 1348 Michael Grillo University of Maine Introduction Extolled for its narrative structuring, mimetic illusionism, and symbolic form, perspective stands out as the signature vision of the Renaissance, setting a normative standard of visualization encoded in opti- cally-based technologies that ensued in later centuries. Modern Era historians have typically described a positivist story of perspective, looking for protean origins in the Late Dugento and Early Trecento that only later Quattrocento artists would finally perfect. For these authors, perspective presented a desirable, yet elusive goal, obtainable only through decades of experimentation1. A variation on this theme entails paralleling this development as part of a similarly difficult Classical revival, one likewise requiring gene- rations of artists to achieve an ostensibly long-term goal of reduplication2. Developing more nuanced un- derstanding of how perspective might articulate, explore, and make operative ideologies characteristic of the Renaissance, Erwin Panofsky and Hubert Damisch consider perspective beyond its mimetic illusions to ask how it serves to create a mythic Classical consciousness, which Samuel Y. Edgerton extends to looking to its link to mapmaking and navigation3. Looking to how core ideologies shape the way in which a culture interacts with its physical environment opens up for this study why interests in a compositional perspective emerged at the start of the Quattrocento. In the deeply-seated positivist model, the Plague years and ensuing decades through the end of the Trecento represented a pause in this ostensibly linear development, derailing only temporally what 1 See J.
    [Show full text]
  • AP Art History Chapter 21Questions: the Renaissance in Quattrocento Italy
    AP Art History Chapter 21Questions: The Renaissance in Quattrocento Italy 1. _______ became a great patron of art and spent the equivalent of _____ dollars to establish the first public library since the ancient world. His grandson, _____ called the _______ spent lavishly on _______, ______, and sculptures. (559) 2. Of all the Florentine masters the Medici family employed, the most famous today is ______ ________. (559) 3. Botticelli painted _______ for Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de’ Medici. What is the narrative of this painting?(559) 4. What was humanism? What is meant by the “Renaissance man”? List at least three qualities of the Italian humanists.(560) 5. In 1401, there was a competition to make bronze doors for the Baptistery of San Giovanni. What was the subject matter for the panel and why was this chosen? Who were the two finalists? Who won and why? (560‐ 562) 6. In the Four Crowned Saints, how did the artist liberate the statuary from its architectural setting? (563) 7. Who is the artist of Saint Mark (figure 21‐5)? List at least three ways that he gives movement and frees it from its architectural setting. (564) 8. In Donatello’s, Saint George and the Dragon, how did he create atmospheric effect? 9. In Donatello’s, Feast of Herod, how does he create rationalized perspective space? 10. Read the grey insert on page 567. What is the definition of linear and atmospheric perspective? (565) 11. Why the east doors of the Baptistery of San Giovanni were called the “Gates of Paradise?” (566) 12. On the panels, the figures stand according to a ________‐_________ perspective and the figures almost appear fully in the _______.
    [Show full text]
  • 9788409083169.Pdf
    Collection « Opéra français / French opera » Directed by Alexandre Dratwicki English translations by Charles Johnston Design : Valentín Iglesias © 2019 Palazzetto Bru Zane – Centre de musique romantique française San Polo 2368 – 30125 Venezia – Italy bru-zane.com Layout, manufacturing and distribution co-ordinated by: Sémele Proyectos Musicales, s.l. Timoteo Padrós, 31 – 28200 San Lorenzo de El Escorial – Spain semelemusic.com All rights reserved. Physical edition printed and made in Spain Legal deposit: Madrid, March 2019 – m-11715-2019 isbn : 978-84-09-08316-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners and the publisher. 2 livres-disques du palazzetto bru zane the palazzetto bru zane’s book+cd series Opéra français Prix de Rome 1 Bach, Amadis de Gaule 1 Claude Debussy Le Palazzetto Bru Zane – Centre de musique romantique française a pour vocation 2 Kreutzer, La Mort d’Abel 2 Camille Saint-Saëns de favoriser la redécouverte du patrimoine musical français du grand xix e siècle (1780- 3 Massenet, Thérèse 3 Gustave Charpentier 1920) en lui assurant le rayonnement qu’il mérite. Installé à Venise, dans un palais de 4 Sacchini, Renaud 4 Max d’Ollone 1695 restauré spécifiquement pour l’abriter, ce centre est une réalisation de la Fondation 5 Massenet, Le Mage 5 Paul Dukas Bru. Il allie ambition artistique et exigence scientifique, reflétant l’esprit humaniste qui 6 Joncières, Dimitri 6 Charles Gounod guide les actions de la fondation.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Offenbach : His Centenary
    Early Journal Content on JSTOR, Free to Anyone in the World This article is one of nearly 500,000 scholarly works digitized and made freely available to everyone in the world by JSTOR. Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid-seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non-commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate-jstor/individuals/early- journal-content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. JACQUES OFFENBACH : HIS CENTENARY By MARTIAL TENEO O N June the 20th, 1819, at Cologne, in the Glockengasse (now only a memory), was born Jacques Offenbach,whose renown, forty years later, was to overspreadthe world. To rehabilitate such an artist, still held in contempt at the present day by our musical "scientists," to restore him to his rightful place on the occasion of the centennial of his birth, is a task worthy of an unbiassed historian.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue No. 13-August 2012 CLANGOUR of “BATTLE”
    Issue no. 13-August 2012 CLANGOUR OF “BATTLE” Paolo Uccello’s celebrated painting emerges from restoration with heightened forcefulness and serves as the true apotheosis of Renaissance perspectival vision, as the fitting conclusion to the “Bagliori Dorati” exhibit The high point and, at least symbolically, the concluding work of the “Bagliori dorati” exhibit is the restored Battle of San Romano that Paolo Uccello painted ca. 1440. In this painting the painstakingly drafted and “flash-frozen” vision in perspective brings together and organizes the chaos, the deafening clamor, the crush and metallic clashing of the chivalric dream at its most extreme. The masterful restoration confirmed the vicissitudes experienced by the panel, which Lorenzo the Magnificent obtained (along with the two others) after putting heavy pressure on its owners, the Bartolini Salimbeni; he then put all three on display in his room in the Palazzo Medici, adapting their shape with cuts and additions. Two armies gleaming in silver and gold; their massive mounts; sweet landscapes barely disturbed by the soldiers’ passage; chain mail and horses’ manes: nothing escapes the painter’s eye in this perspective Renaissance vision. An abridgement of the article “Clamore di “Battaglia”” by Cristina Acidini – Il Giornale degli Uffizi no. 54, August 2012. The Battle of San Romano by Paolo Uccello after restoration Issue no. 13-August 2012 THE SHELL-STUDDED FIRMAMENT Work ends on the Tribuna of the Uffizi Gallery, designed by Buontalenti for Francesco I. The Grand Duke’s dream is the focus of an “epoch-making” restoration project. 6,000 shell valves inlaid in the vermilion dome.
    [Show full text]
  • Opéra-Comique ? Gérard Condé 35 Maître Péronilla : Opéra-Bouffe Or Opéra-Comique ?
    Collection « Opéra français / French opera » Editorial direction: Alexandre Dratwicki / Palazzetto Bru Zane Project management: Camille Merlin / Palazzetto Bru Zane Editorial consulting: Carlos Céster Layout, manufacturing and distribution co-ordination: Sémele Proyectos Musicales Design: Valentín Iglesias – assistance: Rosa Tendero Translations: Charles Johnston (English) © 2020 Palazzetto Bru Zane – Centre de musique romantique française San Polo 2368 – 30125 Venice – Italy bru-zane.com All rights reserved. Physical edition printed in Spain Legal deposit: Madrid, October 2019 – m-21801-2019 isbn : 978-84-09-15588-0 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners and the publisher. livres-disques du palazzetto bru zane Le Palazzetto Bru Zane – Centre de musique romantique française a pour vocation the palazzetto bru zane’s book+cd series de favoriser la redécouverte du patrimoine musical français du grand xix e siècle (1780- 1920) en lui assurant le rayonnement qu’il mérite. Installé à Venise, dans un palais de 1695 restauré spécifiquement pour l’abriter, ce centre est une réalisation de la Fondation Opéra français Prix de Rome Bru. Il allie ambition artistique et exigence scientifique, reflétant l’esprit humaniste qui 1 Bach, Amadis de Gaule 1 Claude Debussy guide les actions de la fondation. Les principales activités du Palazzetto Bru Zane, 2 Kreutzer, La Mort d’Abel 2 Camille Saint-Saëns menées en collaboration étroite avec de nombreux partenaires, sont la recherche, 3 Massenet, Thérèse 3 Gustave Charpentier l’édition de partitions et de livres, la production et la diffusion de concerts à l’international, 4 Sacchini, Renaud 4 Max d’Ollone le soutien à des projets pédagogiques et la publication d’enregistrements discographiques.
    [Show full text]
  • RAR, Volume 16, 1996
    The RUTGERS ART REVIEW Published by the Graduate Students of the Department of Art History at Rutgers, The State University of New jersey Volume 16,1996 Copyright © 1997 by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America ISSN 0194-049X Typeset by Gabrielle Rose and Kelly Winquist Benefactors The Graduate Student Association, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Johnson & Johnson Family of Companies Contributors Robert Bergman Walter Liedtke Friends Joe Giuffre Sara Harrington Stephanie Leone Judith Totaro The editorial board of the Rutgers Art Review, volume 16, gratefully acknowledges the advice and expertise of the faculty of the department of Art History, Rutgers Univer­ sity, and, in particular, faculty advisor Matthew Baigell. We would also like to thank Mariet Westermann, without whose invaluable assistance the interview would not have been possible. Finally the board is very grateful to all of the professional readers of papers submitted for this issue. The editors extend special thanks to Anand Commissiong, office director of the Catharine R. Stimpson Graduate Publications Office of Rutgers University, without whom this issue could not have been published. The Rutgers Art Review extends its appreciation to Nikola Stojsin and Kyle Haidet, members of the Graduate Student Association/Graduate Publications Committee, Rutgers University. Their continued professional support has been crucial to the success of the RAR. Rutgers Art Review Volume 16 Co-Editors Gabrielle Rose Kelly Winquist Editorial Board Julia Alderson Alexis Boylan Rachel Buffington Craig Eliason Ron MacNeil Mary Kate O'Hare Faculty Advisor Matthew Baigell CONTENTS Volume 16 1996 Articles A Reexamination of Nicola Pisano's Pulpits for the Pisa Baptistery and Siena Cathedral Lisa Marie Rafanelli 1 Revisioning Queer Identity: AIDS Discourse and the Impenetrable Subject in Phone Sex Advertising Randall R.
    [Show full text]
  • La Vie Parisienne Sommaire
    Contact diffusion Nathalie Schaaff diff[email protected] +33 6 40 71 56 02 DOSSIER DE PRESSE Jacques OFFENBACH LA VIE PARISIENNE SOMMAIRE Sommaire 2 Distribution 3 Notes d’intention / Le projet 4 Contexte de l’œuvre 6 L’argument 7 Biographie d’Offenbach 8 La presse parle d’autres créations de la compagnie 9 L’équipe de création 10 Qui sommes-nous ? 14 Informations pratiques 15 Création le 1er février 2019 au théâtre de l’Usine-Saint-Céré dans le cadre de la saison d’hiver. "2 Jacques OFFENBACH LA VIE PARISIENNE DISTRIBUTION Opéra-Bou!e sur un livret de Meilhac et Halévy Mise en scène et adaptation livret Benjamin Moreau et Olivier Desbordes Orchestration François Michels Direction musicale Gaspard Brécourt Chorégraphie Fanny Aguado Décors costumes David Belugou Lumières Patrice Gouron Orchestration François Michels Avec Metella Diana Higbee Gabrielle Morgane Bertrand Pauline Lucile Verbizier Baronne Anandha Seethanen Léonie, Louise, Clara Flore Boixel & Bobinet Steeve Brudey Gardefeu Hoël Troadec Le Baron Christophe Lacassagne Le Bottier Lionel Muzin Le Brésilien Thierry Jennaud Vidéaste, Gontran & Joseph Clément Chébli Et tous les artistes pour les ensembles et les danses. Gaspard Brecourt et son orchestre : Clavier Gaspard Brécourt, violon Ludovic Passavant ou Caroline Florenville, guitare Louis Desseigne, trompette Marie Bedat Clarinette/saxophone Francis Prost, trombone François Michels et batterie Eric Boccalini Production ScénOgraph - Scène Conventionnée Théâtre et Théâtre Musical - Figeac / Saint-Céré - Opéra-Éclaté Coproduction Centre lyrique Clermont-Auvergne "3 Jacques OFFENBACH LA VIE PARISIENNE NOTE D’INTENTION - Olivier Desbordes et Benjamin Moreau - mise en scène La Vie Parisienne dans les années 60… 1960 : ce n’est pas simplement une idée pour actualiser, c’est la mise en parallèle de deux époques.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARRIAGE of HEAVEN and HELL David Anfam
    THE MARRIAGE OF HEAVEN AND HELL David Anfam History and art make tricky bedfellows. masters Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Bruegel decade, from the bombing of Cambodia Some artists respond outright to historical the Elder.1 In literature, notable instances at its start to the fall of the Shah at its finish, events – more often than not terrible – and include the dyed-in-the-wool Irishman James not to mention the 1973–74 OPEC oil crisis), their politics. Among the most obvious are Joyce writing Ulysses (1922) in Zürich, Trieste has developed the fantasy, science fiction and Francisco de Goya's The Third of May 1808 and Paris or Erich Auerbach's Mimesis (1946), horror film into a mass-market genre, further (1815) and Pablo Picasso's Guernica (1937). perforce composed in Istanbul without his abetted by the millennium's advent. At one Others seem to sidestep these confrontations. Berlin library.2 Banisadr shares this mix of Think of Johannes Vermeer's serene interiors acuity and remove. Taking the G Line subway realised against the background of an onerous train to Classon Avenue to visit the artist in domesticity with fifteen children. Likewise his immaculate studio, I pondered on the divide, Henri Matisse, whose joyous late cut-outs geographical and conceptual, separating Tehran evolved in the shadow of cancer and his from Brooklyn's Clinton Hill. In turn, it brought daughter's torture by the Gestapo. Another a timely reminder that we still suffer, now with creative type is harder to categorise. Cognisant a vengeance, a quintessential social ill from of the world's woes, they avoid both overt the last century: the mass migration of peoples.
    [Show full text]