DOCSLIB.ORG

A LIVING DEATH Life Without Parole for Nonviolent Offenses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A LIVING DEATH Life Without Parole for Nonviolent Offenses A LIVING DEATH Life without Parole for Nonviolent Offenses November 2013 AtA America’sLiving Expense:Death TheLife Mass without Incarceration Parole of the Elderlyfor Nonviolent Offenses © 2013 ACLU Foundation June 2012 American Civil Liberties Union 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 www.aclu.org Cover image credit: Tim Gruber Cover images: A life sentence in Louisiana means life without the possibility of parole. Because of harsh sentencing laws, about 95 percent of the 5,225 people imprisoned at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola will die there. Louisiana is the state with the highest number of prisoners serving life without parole for nonviolent offenses in the United States, with 429 such prisoners, 91 percent of whom are Black according to the ACLU’s estimates. (Top) Mary Bloomer, a prison security guard, watches as prisoners form a line to travel to their prison jobs, which include farm labor. Angola is a massive maximum security plantation prison, occupying flat delta land equal to the size of Manhattan. (Middle) George Alexander’s socks are marked with his nickname “Ghost.” Alexander was a patient in the Angola hospice program who later succumbed to brain and lung cancers. His nickname is short for “Casper, the Friendly Ghost.” (Bottom) Hospice volunteers roll George Alexander’s coffin from the prison hospital before burial in the prison’s cemetery. Photo credit: Lori Waselchuk, “Grace Before Dying” Back cover image: The cemetery at Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola. TABLE Of CONTENTs I. Executive summary.................................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................... 14 III. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 A. DeFiNiNG “LiFe WiTHOUT PArOLe” ............................................................................................................................. 17 B. DeFiNiNG “NONviOLeNT” ............................................................................................................................................... 18 IV. Findings: The Use of Life without Parole for Nonviolent Crimes ......................................................................... 20 A. RiSe iN LiFe-WiTHOUT-PArOLe SeNTeNCeS ............................................................................................................ 20 B. NONviOLeNT CriMeS that result iN LiFe-WiTHOUT-PArOLe SeNTeNCeS .................................................... 21 C. WHO iS ServiNG LWOP for NONviOLeNT CriMeS: THe NUMBerS .................................................................... 22 D. RaciAL DispariTy iN LiFe-WiTHOUT-PArOLe SeNTeNCiNG .................................................................................. 29 V. How We Got Here: skyrocketing Extreme sentences and Mass Incarceration .............................................. 32 A. THe “WAr ON DrUGS” AND Mandatory MiNiMUM SeNTeNCiNG Laws ............................................................ 33 B. THree-STrikeS AND OTHer HABiTUAL OFFeNDer Laws ..................................................................................... 35 C. CHANGeS to PArOLe Laws AND OTHer LiMitatiONS ON reLeASe .................................................................... 36 VI. Case studies: 110 Offenders sentenced to Die in Prison for Nonviolent Crimes .......................................... 38 A. FirST-TiMe NONviOLeNT OFFeNDerS ........................................................................................................................ 39 B. NONviOLeNT Teenage OFFeNDerS ............................................................................................................................ 67 C. TyiNG JUDGeS’ HANDS: Mandatory LiFe WiTHOUT PArOLe ................................................................................ 74 D. LiFe WiTHOUT PArOLe for NONviOLeNT OFFeNSeS UNDer HABiTUAL OFFeNDer Laws ........................... 98 i. State Habitual Offenders .......................................................................................................................................101 ii. Federal Habitual Offenders ..................................................................................................................................150 e. LiFe WiTHOUT PArOLe for MAriJUANA ..................................................................................................................156 F. LiFe WiTHOUT PArOLe DUe to Crack/Powder CocaiNe SeNTeNCiNG DispariTy .....................................168 G. AGiNG AND eLDerLy NONviOLeNT PriSONerS ......................................................................................................174 H. TerMiNALLy iLL NONviOLeNT PriSONerS ..............................................................................................................178 VII. The Reality of serving Life without Parole ...................................................................................................................182 A. What iT MeANS to Be SeNTeNCeD to LiFe WiTHOUT PArOLe ..........................................................................183 i. Hopelessness, Depression, and Suicidal Thoughts and Attempts ..................................................................184 ii. Isolation from Family .............................................................................................................................................186 B. PriSON CONDiTiONS .....................................................................................................................................................187 i. Violence ...................................................................................................................................................................187 ii. Solitary Confinement .............................................................................................................................................188 iii. Restricted Access to Drug Treatment, vocational, and educational Programs ............................................189 C. LiMiTeD JUDiCiAL revieW OF Death-iN-PriSON SeNTeNCeS ...........................................................................190 D. VirTUALLy NO CHANCe OF CLeMeNCy Or Compassionate reLeASe .............................................................192 VIII. The financial Cost of sentencing Nonviolent Offenders to Life without Parole ........................................194 A. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................195 B. Fiscal COST-SAviNGS eSTimateS .............................................................................................................................198 IX. Comparative International Practice and fundamental Rights to Humane Treatment, Proportionate sentence, and Rehabilitation ...............................................................................................................200 A. OUT OF STeP WiTH THe WOrLD ..................................................................................................................................200 B. DiSPrOPOrTionate SeNTeNCeS violate iNTernatiONAL Law .......................................................................203 C. RiGHT to reHABiLitatiON UNDer iNTernatiONAL Law .....................................................................................205 D. U.S. CONSTiTUTiONAL Law ..........................................................................................................................................206 X. Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................................209 A Living Death: Life without Parole for Nonviolent Offenses I. Executive summary ife in prison without a chance of parole is, short of Bureau of Prisons, and state Departments of Corrections, execution, the harshest imaginable punishment.1 Life obtained pursuant to Freedom of Information Act and open Lwithout parole (LWOP) is permanent removal from records requests filed by the ACLU. Our research is also society with no chance of reentry, no hope of freedom. based on telephone interviews conducted by the ACLU with One should expect the American criminal justice system to prisoners, their lawyers, and family members; correspondence condemn someone to die in prison only for the most serious with prisoners serving life without parole for nonviolent offenses. offenses; a survey of 355 prisoners serving life without parole for nonviolent offenses; and media and court records searches. Yet across the country, thousands of people are serving life sentences without the possibility of parole for nonviolent crimes as petty as siphoning gasoline from an 18-wheeler, sentenced to Die Behind Bars for shoplifting three belts, breaking into a parked car and stealing Nonviolent Crimes a woman’s bagged lunch, or possessing a bottle cap smeared with heroin residue. In their cruelty and harshness, these Using data obtained from the Bureau of Prisons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CASE NO. 14-30067 UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the FIFTH CIRCUIT ELZIE BALL; NATHANIEL CODE; JAMES MAGEE, Plaintiffs-Appel
    CASE NO. 14-30067 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ELZIE BALL; NATHANIEL CODE; JAMES MAGEE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS; BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY; ANGELIA NORWOOD, WARDEN OF DEATH ROW; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from The United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana, Case No. 3:13-cv-00368 Hon. Brian A. Jackson APPELLEES’ PRINCIPAL AND RESPONSE BRIEF Mercedes Montagnes, LA Bar Mitchell A. Kamin, CA Bar No. 202788 No. 33287 (Lead Counsel) Jessica Kornberg, CA Bar No. 264490 Elizabeth Compa, LA Bar No. 35004 Nilay U. Vora, CA Bar No. 268339 The Promise of Justice Initiative Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, 636 Baronne Street Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C. New Orleans, LA 70113 1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor Telephone: (504) 529-5955 Los Angeles, California 90067-2561 Facsimile: (504) 558-0378 Telephone: (310) 201-2100 [email protected] Facsimile: (310) 201-2110 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Steven Scheckman, LA Bar No. 08472 [email protected] Schiff, Scheckman & White LLP 829 Baronne Street New Orleans, LA 70113 Telephone: (504) 581-9322 Facsimile: (504) 581-7651 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 28.2.1, the undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-4-2011 Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992 Lydia Pelot-Hobbs University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Pelot-Hobbs, Lydia, "Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992" (2011). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 349. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/349 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Urban Studies by Lydia Pelot-Hobbs B.A. Oberlin College 2007 August 2011 Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv Epigraph .............................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining New Orleans : Literature, Local Memory, and the Fate of a City / Barbara Eckstein
    This page intentionally left blank SustainingSstasta g New Orleans Literature, Local Memory, and the Fate of a City Barbara Eckstein First published 2006 by Routledge Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. ISBN-13: 978-0-415-94782-4 (hbk) ISBN-13: 978-0-415-94783-1 (pbk) Library of Congress Card Number 2005012589 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Eckstein, Barbara J. Sustaining New Orleans : literature, local memory, and the fate of a city / Barbara Eckstein. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-415-94782-0 (alk. paper) -- ISBN 0-415-94783-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. American literature--Louisiana--New Orleans--History and criticism. 2. New Orleans (La.)-- Intellectual life. 3. New Orleans (La.)--In literature. 4. New Orleans (La.)--Civilization. I. Title. PS267.N49E27 2005 810.9'9763--dc22 2005012589 Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com Taylor & Francis Group and the Routledge Web site at is the Academic Division of T&F Informa plc. http://www.routledge-ny.com For Robert Udick, 1957–1999, and Jim Knudsen, 1950–2004, friends of New Orleans and friends of mine. This page intentionally left blank Contents Preface xi 1 The Claims for New Orleans’s Exceptionalism 1 2 “Indiscourageable Progress”: The Decline of the New Orleans Streetcar and the Rise of A Streetcar Named Desire 31 3 Sex and the Historic City: A Walking Tour on the Wild Side 65 4 Malaise and Miasms: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith on the Farm: an Analysis of Angola Prison's Moral Rehabilitation Program Under the Establishment Clause Roy L
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 71 | Number 4 Summer 2011 Faith on the Farm: An Analysis of Angola Prison's Moral Rehabilitation Program Under the Establishment Clause Roy L. Bergeron Jr. Repository Citation Roy L. Bergeron Jr., Faith on the Farm: An Analysis of Angola Prison's Moral Rehabilitation Program Under the Establishment Clause, 71 La. L. Rev. (2011) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol71/iss4/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Faith on the Farm: An Analysis of Angola Prison's Moral Rehabilitation Program Under the Establishment Clause "Moral people are not criminals. That's why moral rehabilitationis the only true rehabilitation." INTRODUCTION The numbers are alarming: The United States leads the world with the highest incarceration rate, with 756 out of every 100,000 people in jail.2 Louisiana leads the country in the same category with 858 of every 100,000 citizens behind bars.3 Even when the incarcerated are finally released, the chances are likely that they will return to prison at some point within the next three years. With a systemic problem of these proportions, what should the states do to combat this epidemic? One proposed answer is to turn to religion.s Some evidence exists that faith-based programming can rehabilitate offenders and Copyright 2011, by RoY L.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis V. Cain
    Case 3:15-cv-00318-SDD-RLB Document 498 10/03/18 Page 1 of 137 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOSEPH LEWIS, JR., KENTRELL PARKER, FARRELL SAMPIER, REGINALD GEORGE, JOHN TONUBBEE, OTTO BARRERA, CLYDE CARTER, CEDRIC EVANS, EDWARD GIOVANNI, RICKY D. DAVIS, LIONEL TOLBERT, and CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-00318 RUFUS WHITE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CHIEF JUDGE: Hon. Shelly D. Dick Plaintiffs, MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. v. BURL CAIN, Warden of the Louisiana State Penitentiary, in his official capacity; STEPHANIE LAMARTINIERE, Assistant Warden for Health Services, in her official capacity; JAMES M. LEBLANC, Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, in his official capacity; and THE LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Case 3:15-cv-00318-SDD-RLB Document 498 10/03/18 Page 2 of 137 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CLASS MEMBERS ........................................................................................................... 1 II. DEFENDANTS ................................................................................................................ 1 III. OVERVIEW OF MEDICAL CARE PROVIDED BY DEFENDANTS ......... 2 IV. THE PARTIES’ EXPERTS ......................................................................................... 6 A. Plaintiffs’ Experts ........................................................................................................... 6
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER TERM 2006 Reference Index Contents
    JNL06$IND1—10-16-07 16:47:01 JNLINDPGT MILES OCTOBER TERM 2006 Reference Index Contents: Page Statistics ....................................................................................... II General .......................................................................................... III Appeals ......................................................................................... III Applications ................................................................................. III Arguments ................................................................................... III Attorneys ...................................................................................... IV Briefs ............................................................................................. IV Certiorari ..................................................................................... IV Costs .............................................................................................. V Granted Cases ............................................................................. V Motions ......................................................................................... V Opinions ........................................................................................ VI Original Cases ............................................................................. VI Rehearing ..................................................................................... VI Rules ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hacker V. Cain
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JASON HACKER (#383727) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 14-063-JWD-EWD N. BURL CAIN, ET AL. JUDGMENT This matter came before the Court for a trial by jury beginning on January 30, 2017. On February 1, 2017, the Court granted Defendants' Rule 50 motion that dismissed John Bel Edwards individually and in his official capacity as the Governor of State of Louisiana, and the parties agreed to dismiss the State of Louisiana in this matter. On February 2, 2017, the jury rendered its verdict and found (1) that Mr. Hacker failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered from a qualified disability under the ADA/RA before he received eye surgery, (2) that the Plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that neither of the Individual Defendants, Burl Cain nor James LeBlanc, through their supervision of others, subjected Plaintiff to deliberate medical indifference by delaying Plaintiff's cataract surgery in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and (3) that Plaintiff failed to prove that neither of the Individual Defendants, Burl Cain nor James LeBlanc, through their supervision of others, were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's medical needs by requiring Mr. Hacker to do manual work in the field that was dangerous because he had a visual impairment and (4) that Plaintiff failed to prove that neither of the Individual Defendants, Burl Cain nor James LeBlanc, through their supervision of others, were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's medical needs by requiring Mr. Hacker to do manual work in the license tag plant that was dangerous because he had a visual impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles & Features Saul Anuzis
    SEE PAGE 16 ARTICLES & FEATURES SAUL ANUZIS PATRICK HICKEY LOUIE HUNTER PHIL KENT LOUIS MAYEUX GARY REESE MATT TOWERY HASTINGS WYMAN SOUTHERN REPORT Departments Phil Kent 4 6 18 PUBLISHED BY INSIDERADVANTAGE.COM, INC. INTERNET NEWS AGENCY, LLC Features BILL CASSIDY Looks at Obamacare, Other Issues P.O. BOX 724787 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 31139 by Louis Mayeux 14 404 • 233 • 3710 SUPER TUESDAY SEC PRIMARY GAINING GROUND READ DAILY UPDATES AT WWW.SOUTHERNPOLITICALREPORT.COM by Phil Kent 16 CHAIRMAN & FOUNDING PUBLISHER MATT TOWERY Columns & Articles PUBLISHER EMERITUS HASTINGS WYMAN ATLANTA And its Resilient, Growing Metro Area PUBLISHER & EDITOR PHIL KENT by Louie Hunter 8 [email protected] BIRMINGHAM Is a “Must See” Southern Destination CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER LOUIE HUNTER by Patrick Hickey 9 STAFF WRITER ST. PETERSBURG The South’s Top Mid-Size City GARY REESE by Gary Reese 11 CONTRIBUTING WRITER SAUL ANUZIS NewsMaxTV CIRCULATION DIRECTOR/STAFF WRITER PATRICK HICKEY Florida Boasts a Major Cable News Force by Gary Reese 12 STAFF WRITER LOUIS MAYEUX The Growing ADVERTISING & SALES SCOTT BARD National Popular Vote Campaign DOLLE ECKERT TOWERY [email protected] by Saul Anuzis 21 DESIGN & LAYOUT With Jeb, Marco, and Hillary in, BURTCH HUNTER DESIGN Florida is Likely an “Ironic” Ground Zero for 2016 Battles FOR SUBSCRIPTIONS by Matt Towery 24 PLEASE VISIT US ONLINE AT: WWW.SOUTHERNPOLITICALREPORT.COM OR Key Southern Races MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO INSIDERADVANTAGE AND MAIL PAYMENT TO: by Hastings Wyman SOUTHERN POLITICAL REPORT KENTUCKY P.O. BOX 724787 22 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 31139 MISSISSIPPI 404 • 233 • 3710 25 $19.80/YEAR ($4.95/ISSUE) LOUISIANA 26 Phil Kent Our founding publisher Matt Towery once wrote an in this issue I’m writing about Georgia Secretary of essay on friendship that has stuck with me over the State Brian Kemp’s increasingly-popular idea of devel- years.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Selected for State Police Barracks Chapel
    Site Selected for State Police Barracks Chapel Changing Hearts and Lives By Building Chapels Preparations are being made to begin construction on the chapel in Louisiana’s at the Louisiana State Police Barracks near Zachary, Louisiana. Prisons The Barracks is a prison facility which houses up to 200 Department of Corrections inmates. The prison is located on the 1,760 acre State Louisiana Prison Chapel Police Training Facility. There is no existing structure for faith-based Foundation ministries and at this time there are few ministries offered. “ Once an 527 North Blvd. inmate is transferred from a state facility with a chapel and thriving Baton Rouge, LA 70802 faith-based ministries, he no longer has a strong faith community within Phone: 225-931-7023 for support and spiritual growth. We heard the cries from the inmates Fax: 225-344-0142 and their families for a chapel. I ’ m so thankful the time has arrived ” , Email: [email protected] says Cindy Mann, executive director, Louisiana Prison Chapel Founda- Website: www. chapels.org tion. Louisiana State Police Barracks will be the fourteenth chapel built by the foundation. Page 2 Louisiana Prison Chapel Foundation Building Hope Louisiana State Police Barracks in Zachary and Allen Correctional Center in Kinder are the last two prisons without a chapel. The vision of having a place of worship in correctional facilities within the Department of Public Safety and Corrections is almost complete! We need your help. …. and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 2 Corinthians 3:17
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Dmese\Local Settings\Temp
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHANNON DALE CASSELS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 03 - 0709 - D - M2 RICHARD STALDER, SECRETARY OF LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, ET AL. JUDGE JAMES J. BRADY RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS TO BE DEEMED ADMITTED This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 18) and Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (doc. 25) and (doc. 34). Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are opposed (doc. 47). Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Undisputed Facts to be Deemed Admitted (doc. 48). This motion has been opposed (doc. 50). Subject matter jurisdiction in this Court exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. Oral argument was held on the motions on August 26, 2004, and this matter was submitted on the briefs. I. BACKGROUND Shannon Cassels (“Plaintiff”), an inmate at the Louisiana State Penitentiary (“LSP”), Angola, Louisiana, filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against: (1) Richard Stalder, Secretary of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Page -1- Corrections; (2) Warden Burl Cain; (3) Lieutenant Shasyoski Anderson; (4) Warden Leslie Dupont; (5) Major Richard Ducote; and (6) Classification Officer Pauline Turner (“Defendants”). Plaintiff complains that he was convicted of violating an unconstitutionally vague and overbroad prison rule. In addition, he alleges this conviction was in retaliation for his mother’s placing an advertisement for legal assistance on the internet. Plaintiff was charged with violating Rules 30k and 30w of the Louisiana Disciplinary Rules and Procedures.1 The disciplinary board dismissed the Rule 30w charge.2 However, the disciplinary board held that the plaintiff had “spread rumors” and convicted him of violating Rule 30k.
    [Show full text]
  • Williams V. Mckeithen
    CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:lamd - Docket Report Page 1 of 346 ATTENTION, CLOSED U.S. District Court Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:71-cv-00098-FJP Williams, et al v. Edwards, et al Date Filed: 03/26/1971 Assigned to: Chief Judge Frank J. Polozola Jury Demand: None Demand: $0 Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act Rights Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Hayes Williams represented by Keith B. Nordyke Keith B. Nordyke, LLC 427 Mayflower Street Baton Rouge, LA 70802 225-383-1601 Fax: 225-383-2725 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Angela M. Pelletier Arnold and Porter 555 12th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 202-942-6027 Blake A. Biles Arnold and Porter 555 12th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 202-942-6027 June E. Denlinger Nordyke & Denlinger 427 Mayflower Street P. O. Box 237 Baton Rouge, LA 70821 225-383-1601 Fax: 383-2725 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kathleen A. Behan Arnold and Porter 555 12th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 https://ecf.lamd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748709067794647-L_280_0-1 8/3/2005 CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:lamd - Docket Report Page 2 of 346 202-942-5000 Fax: 202-942-5999 Robert Howard Cooper Pelleteri, Weidorn & Cooper 400 Poydras Street Suite 1980 New Orleans, LA 70130 504-523-2650 Plaintiff Lee D. Stevenson represented by Keith B. Nordyke TERMINATED: 10/21/1997 (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/21/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED June E.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Middle District of Louisiana
    Case 3:15-cv-00318-SDD-RLB Document 594 03/31/21 Page 1 of 124 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOSEPH LEWIS, JR., ET AL. CIVIL DOCKET NO.: 3:15-CV-318 VERSUS JUDGE: SHELLY DICK BURL CAIN, ET AL. MAGISTRATE: RICHARD BOURGEOIS OPINION I. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This suit was originally brought by several inmates incarcerated at the Louisiana State Penitentiary (“LSP”). The LSP at Angola (sometimes referred to as “Angola”) is a maximum-security men’s prison in Angola, Louisiana that housed between 6200-6400 men throughout the discovery period.1 Plaintiffs claim that the medical care provided at LSP violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiffs also claim that, through various general practices and policies, LSP systemically violates the rights of disabled inmates covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)2 and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”).3 The Plaintiffs sought to represent a class of all prisoners who are now, or will in the future, be confined at LSP (the “Class”), as well as an ADA Subclass of inmates with 1 Undisputed Facts (“UF”) ¶ 1, First Amended Joint Pretrial Order (“JPTO”), Rec. Doc. No. 242-2; PX 6 at 0017; DX 14 at 02876. The relevant time period in this matter was confined to May 20, 2015 (the date of filing) and September 30, 2016 (the close of the discovery period). 2 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. 3 29 U.S.C. § 701. Document Number: 52892 Page 1 of 124 Case 3:15-cv-00318-SDD-RLB Document 594 03/31/21 Page 2 of 124 disabilities
    [Show full text]