MID 8-History of the Meeting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

MIDANPIRG/8- REPORT INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION REPORT OF THE EIGHTH MEETING OF THE MIDDLE EAST AIR NAVIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP MIDANPIRG/8 (Cairo, 7-11 September 2003) The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the Regional Planning and Implementation Group and not of the Organization. This Report will, however, be submitted to the ICAO Council and any formal action taken will be published in due course as a Supplement to the Report Approved by the Meeting and published by authority of the Secretary General The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontier or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I - HISTORY OF THE MEETING 1. Place and Duration ................................................................................................ 1 2. Opening ................................................................................................................ 1 3. Attendance............................................................................................................ 1 4. Officers and Secretariat .......................................................................................... 1 5. Language .............................................................................................................. 2 6. Agenda ................................................................................................................. 2 7. Conclusion and Decisions – Definition..................................................................... 3 8. List of Conclusions and Decisions........................................................................ 3-5 9. List of Participants .............................................................................................5-19 PART II - REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS Report on Agenda Item 1 .................................................................................... 1-1 Report on Agenda Item 2 .................................................................................... 2-1 Report on Agenda Item 3 .................................................................................... 3-1 Report on Agenda Item 4 .................................................................................... 4-1 Appendix 4A & 4B Report on Agenda Item 5 ............................................................................. 5-1/5-21 Report on Agenda Item 6 ............................................................................. 6-1/6-30 Appendix 6A –6T Report on Agenda Item 7 .................................................................................... 7-1 Report on Agenda Item 8 ...............................................................................8-1/8-5 Appendix 8A-8J Report on Agenda Item 9 ................................................................................9-1/92 Appendix 9A-9D Report on Agenda Item 10.......................................................................... 10-1/10-3 Appendix 10A --------------------- MIDANPIRG/8-REPORT -1- MIDANPIRG/8 History of the Meeting _____________________________________________________________________________ PART I - HISTORY OF THE MEETING 1. PLACE AND DURATION 1.1 The eighth Meeting of the Middle East Air Navigation Planning and Implementation Regional Group (MIDANPIRG/8) was held at the conference hall of the Egyptian Ministry of Civil Aviation Complex, Cairo from 7-11 September 2003. 2. OPENING 2.1 A.V.M. Magd El-Din Refaat Mohamed, Chief of General Secretariat, Ministry of Civil Aviation welcomed the participants to Cairo and offered the Egyptian Ministry of Civil Aviation’s assistant to them, if required. He further wished all a successful meeting. 2.2 Mr. A. Zerhouni, ICAO Regional Director, thanked the Egyptian Ministry of Civil Aviation and the Egyptian National Air Navigation Services Company for hosting the MIDANPIRG/8 meeting. He warmly welcomed all the delegates to Cairo, and extended his special greetings to the Iraqi delegation headed by, Dr. Shakir Abdulla, Secretary General, Ministry of Transport, and Mr. Fakir Mohammed, Director General for Civil Aviation Authority. 2.3 Mr. Zerhouni, in his opening remarks briefly referred to the Eleventh Air Navigation Conference, the air navigation implementation strategies and process in the MID Region illustrated by a number of successful projects such as EMARSSH, GNSS, RNP/RNAV and RVSM. Mr Zerhouni, further stressed on improvement in quality, accuracy and performance and the increase of dialogue between the MID and its adjacent regions. He also indicated that the terms of reference (TOR) of the MIDANPIRG are designed to keep high regional standards and to incorporate better understanding of how to introduce advanced technology to embrace the full scope of challenges ahead and economic analysis. Finally, Mr. Zerhouni launched an appeal for a more substantive support to the MIDANPIRG work programme and wished the meeting every success in its deliberations. 2.4 Mr. Abdullah N. Al-Harthy, Chairman of MIDANPIRG also welcomed all delegates to MIDANPIRG, and wished them a fruitful meeting. 2.5 Mr. V. Zubkov, Chief of Regional Affairs Office (ICAO HQ, Montreal) address the meeting and provided a presentation on the history, mechanism, process and success stories of the MIDANPIRG. 3. ATTENDANCE 3.1 The meeting was attended by a total of seventy-three participants, which included experts from fourteen States and three International Organization. Three companies were authorized to attend the meeting as guest without participation to the debates (ARINC, ISI and VERESTAR). The list of participants is at pages 5-19. 4. OFFICERS AND SECRETARIAT 4.1 Mr. A. Zerhouni, ICAO Middle East Regional Director acted as the secretary of the Meeting, assisted by Mr. M. Khonji Deputy Regional Director, and the following ICAO Regional Officers MIDANPIRG/8-REPORT -2- MIDANPIRG/8 History of the Meeting _____________________________________________________________________________ Mr. M.E.B. Zarroug - Regional Officer, Air Transport Mr. D. Ramdoyal - Regional Officer, Air Traffic Management and Search and Rescue Mr. M. Traore - Regional Officer, Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Mrs. N. Abdel Hady - Regional Officer, Aerodrome and Ground Aids Mr. M. Smaoui - Regional Officer, Aeronautical Information Services and Chart Mr. A. El-Karimy - Technical Co-operation, Field Operations Officer 4.2 The meeting was also assisted from ICAO HQ, Montreal by Mr. V. D. Zubkov, Chief Regional Affairs Office, Mr. H. V. Sudarshan, Regional Affairs Officer and from ICAO Paris Office by Mr. Bjorn Hellroth, Regional Officer Meteorology. 5. LANGUAGE 5.1 The discussions were conducted in English. Documentation was issued in English. 6. AGENDA 6.1 The following Agenda was adopted: Item 1 - Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairpersons. Item 2 - Adoption of the Provisional Agenda. Item 3- Review of action taken by the ANC and the Council on the report of MIDANPIRG/7. Item 4 - Review of outstanding Conclusions/Decisions of MIDANPIRG/7. Item 5 - Latest developments in the Air Navigation field. Item 6 - Middle East Air Navigation issues: 6.1 AOP. 6.2 ATM/SAR/ AIS. 6.3 CNS/ATM/IC. 6.4 CNS/MET. Item 7 - Eleventh Air Navigation Conference (ANConf/11) Item 8 - Deficiencies in the Air Navigation field. Item 9 - Future Work Programme. Item 10 - Any other business MIDANPIRG/8-REPORT -3- MIDANPIRG/8 History of the Meeting _____________________________________________________________________________ 7. CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONS – DEFINITION 7.1 The MIDANPIRG records its actions in the form of Conclusions and Decisions with the following significance: a) Conclusions deal with matters that, according to the Group’s terms of reference, merit directly the attention of States, or on which further action will be initiated by the Secretary in accordance with established procedures; and b) Decisions relate solely to matters dealing with the internal working arrangements of the Group and its Sub-Groups 8. LIST OF CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONS CONCLUSION 8/1: HARMONIZATION OF AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEMS DECISION 8/2: REVISED TERMS OF REFERENCE AND WORK PROGRAMME FOR THE AOP SUB-GROUP DECISION 8/3: AERODROME CERTIFICATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOLLOW-UP REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE CONCLUSION 8/4: CERTIFICATION OF AERODROMES IMPLEMENTATION MANDATES CONCLUSION 8/5: CONDUCT OF A RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY ON BIRD STRIKE HAZARDS TO AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS SAFETY ON OR IN THE VICINITY OF MID AIRPORTS CONCLUSION 8/6: IMPACT OF NEW LARGE AEROPLANES (NLAS) OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENT ON EXISTING AERODROME PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, FACILITIES AND SERVICES DECISION 8/7: FOLLOW UP OF STATE SAFETY MEASURES RELATED TO ADEQUACY OF EXISTING INT’L AERODROMES TO ACCOMEDATE NLA OPERATIONS CONCLUSION 8/8: NEED FOR TRAINING OF STATE AERODROME INSPECTORS DECISION 8/9: AMENDMENT TO THE MID ATS ROUTE NETWORK CONCLUSION 8/10: TRAFFIC ORIENTATION SCHEME WITHIN CAIRO FIR DECISION 8/11: ALLOCATION OF FIVE-LETTER NAME-CODES CONCLUSION 812: ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGIONAL SAFETY AND MONITORING AGENCY CONCLUSION 8/13: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ATS SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN THE MID REGION DECISION 8/14: TERMS OF REFERENCE, AND WORK PROGRAMME OF THE ATS INCIDENT ANALYSIS TASK FORCE CONCLUSION 8/15: METHODOLOGY FOR THE REPORTING AND ANALYSIS OF ATS INCIDENTS
Recommended publications
  • Appendix of Selected Air Navigation Service Providers

    Appendix of Selected Air Navigation Service Providers

    Appendix of Selected Air Navigation Service Providers This appendix contains information a focus of this study is the critical role on the primary air navigation service that scheduled airlines will play in the providers (ANSPs) for the 60 countries definition, financing, and success of air selected by Air Traffic Infrastructure traffic infrastructure programs, the chart Global Markets 2012, presenting infor- presents scheduled airline origination mation tied to improvement, support, and destination (O&D) traffic within the operation, and financing of communica- ANSP’s territory for those years. This tions, navigation and surveillance (CNS) (O&D) traffic generally has the greatest services, and air traffic management interaction with air navigation services (ATM) capabilities through 2021. and the greatest demand for the infra- structure supporting those services. Each ANSP summary identifies the nation (or state, in the parlance of the International Civil Aviation Organiza- NEXA Assessment tion) served by the ANSP, the govern- Each assessment begins with NEXA’s ment agency to which it reports (where rationale for the ANSP’s inclusion in this appropriate) and the name of the ANSP study; it is paired with a chart depicting (preceded in some cases by the name six fundamentals underlying that ratio- of the agency in which it resides). Each nale. The six are: ownership and control, includes a map of the airspace served the source of revenue, the transparency by the ANSP, along with its neighboring of its business practices, the current flight information regions, and a chart state of its infrastructure, the rating of air traffic for 2006 and 2011. Since of its (or its “owner’s”) credit risk, and the projected annual air traffic growth (for the region in which the ANSP op- erates combined, where available, with forecasts for its host country).
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2011 EDITION

    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2011 EDITION

    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2011 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS................................................................................................ 1 II. AIRPORTS.................................................................................................................. 5 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………… ……………………….……...7 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY......................................................................... 9 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT............................................................................... 10 VI. U.S. CONGRESS...................................................................................................... 12 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS .................................................... 14 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA..................................................................................................... 15 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST .................................................................................17 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................... 19 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions and aviation-related
  • THE IMPLEMENTATION of the YAMOUSSOUKRO DECISION By

    THE IMPLEMENTATION of the YAMOUSSOUKRO DECISION By

    THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE YAMOUSSOUKRO DECISION By Charles E. Schlumberger Institute of Air and Space Law, Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal. February 2009 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Civil Law (DCL) © Charles E. Schlumberger, 2009 THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE YAMOUSSOUKRO DECISION TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................................................................. v ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. viii RÉSUMÉ........................................................................................................................................ ix INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE YAMOUSSOUKRO DECISION................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Early development of air services in Africa ....................................................................... 8 1.2 Post World War II era...................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 2 MAJOR ELEMENTS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE YAMOUSSOUKRO DECISION............................................................................................. 20 2.1
  • Boeing 777 - Wikipedia 3/30/20, 11�46 AM

    Boeing 777 - Wikipedia 3/30/20, 1146 AM

    Boeing 777 - Wikipedia 3/30/20, 1146 AM Boeing 777 The Boeing 777 is a wide-body airliner developed and manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes, commonly referred to as the Triple Seven.[5][6] The 777 was designed to bridge the gap between Boeing's 767 and Boeing 777 747, and to replace older DC-10s or L-1011s. Developed in consultation with eight major airlines, with a first meeting in January 1990, the program was launched on October 14, 1990 with a first order from United Airlines. The prototype was rolled out on April 9, 1994, and first flew on June 12, 1994. The 777 first entered commercial service with United Airlines on June 7, 1995. Longer range variants were launched on February 29, 2000 and were first delivered on April 29, 2004. It is the largest twinjet and has a typical 3-class capacity of 301 to 368 passengers, with a range of 5,240 to 8,555 nautical miles (9,704 to 15,844 km). It is recognizable for its large-diameter turbofan engines, six wheels on each main landing gear, fully circular fuselage cross-section,[7] and a blade-shaped tail cone.[8] It has fly-by-wire controls, a first for Boeing. It competed initially with the out-of-production Airbus A340 and McDonnell Douglas MD-11, with the Airbus A330-300 and the newer Airbus A350 XWB. The 777 is a low-wing twinjet; the original -200 is The original 777 with a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of 545,000–660,000 lb (247–299 t) was produced in the shortest variant.
  • Annual Report 2009 COMMISSION EUROPEAN Annual Report 2009 Report Annual Market Transport Air European the of Analyses Annual

    Annual Report 2009 COMMISSION EUROPEAN Annual Report 2009 Report Annual Market Transport Air European the of Analyses Annual

    Annual Report 2009 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Institute of Air Transport and Airport Research February 2011 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Rainer Kiehne, Alexandra Leipold, Dr. Sven Maertens, Melanie Murphy, Dr. Peter Meincke, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Final Report 2011-02-15 Release: 1.8 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2009 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG MOVE Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2009 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 1.8 Save date: 2011-02-15 Total pages: 203 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 0.1 2010-01-21 0.2 2010-04-15 0.21 2010-04-23 1st Draft Report 2009 0.3 2010-07-26 Final Draft Report 2009 0.31 2010-09-02 0.32 2010-09-08 0.33 2010-09-20 corrections after review 0.34 2010-10-21 Final Report 2009 - Draft 1.0 2010-10-28 final language check Final Report 2009 1.1 2010-10-29 internal 1.2 2010-12-10 internal 1.3 2010-12-13 internal 1.4 2010-12-20 Final Report 2009 1.5 2011-01-21 1, 2 Final Report 2009 1.6 2011-01-27 1 Final Report 2009 1.7 2011-01-28 Summary detail Final Report 2009 1.8 2011-02-15 Disclaimer Final Report 2009 Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
  • Final Report

    Final Report

    Final Report Concerning EgyptAir Boeing 777-200 aircraft cockpit fire AT Cairo Airport On 29th July 2011 Registration SU-GBP Flight No MS 667 Cairo/ Jeddah Issued by Aircraft Accident Investigation Central Directorate Egyptian Ministry of Civil Aviation Cairo September, 2012 1 Foreword In accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and with European Regulation n°996/2010, the investigation has not been not conducted so as to apportion blame, nor to assess individual or collective responsibility. The sole objective is to draw lessons from this occurrence which may help to prevent future accidents. Consequently, the use of this report for any purpose other than for the prevention of future accidents could lead to erroneous interpretations. 2 Table of Contents FOREWORD TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY SYNOPSIS INFORMATION ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE 1 - FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1 History of Flight 1.2 Injuries to persons 1.3 Damage to aircraft A. Examination of the aircraft. B. Accident aircraft photos. 1.4 Other Damages 1.5 Personnel Information 1.5.1 Captain A. Captain information. B. Captain statement. 1.5.2 F/O A. F/O information. B. F/O statement. 1.6 Aircraft Information 1.6.1 Aircraft General Information. 1.6.2 Important Extracts from B777 Flight Crew Operations Manual D632W001-EGP (FCOM). 1.7 Meteorological Information 1.8 Aids to Navigation 1.9 Communication 1.10 Aerodrome Information 1.11 Flight Recorders 1.11.1 Cockpit Voice Recorder CVR. 3 1.11.2 Flight Data Recorder FDR. 1.11.3 QAR (Quick Access Recorder). 1.11.4 Time correlation between CVR audio and the Cairo Airport Authority surveillance video tape for the accident.