Lawrencecopagreenways08

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lawrencecopagreenways08 Connections Linking LawrenceLawrence County’s ResourceResourcess Through Greenways DCNR Project #BRC-TAG-11.5-24 June 2008 Th is project was fi nanced in part by a grant by a grant from the Pennsylvania De- Pashek Associates from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and partment of Community & Economic Conservation fund under the administration Development, Land Use Planning Technical of the Pennsylvania Department of Con- Assistance Program, and by the Lawrence servation and Natural Resources, Bureau of County Commissioners. Conservation and Recreation, Acknowledgements Contributions by the following groups and individuals were essential to the development of a greenways vision for Lawrence County. Th eir time, knowledge, decision-making, and dedication throughout the planning process made the Lawrence County Greenways Plan possible. Lawrence County Commissioners Dan Vogler, Chairman Steve Craig Ed Fosnaught Lawrence County Planning Commission Lawrence County Planning Department and Staff Greenways Project Study Committee Nancy Bergey - Friends of McConnell’s Mill, League of Women Voters Joyce Cuff - Shenango River Watchers Megan Gahring - Lawrence County Conservation District Candee Hovis - Laurel High School Teacher Richard Lutz - Wampum Chapter of the North Country Trail Association JoAnn McBride - Lawrence County Tourist Promotion Agency Ed McCready - Lawrence-Beaver Farm Bureau JoAnn McCready - Lawrence County Conservation District Amy McKinney - Lawrence County Planning Director Carl Petrus - Lawrence County Cycling Club Amy Reeher - Penn/Ohio Watershed Association Janet Verone - Lawrence County Planning Commission, Friends of McConnell’s Mill, League of Women’s Voters Jerry Zona - Lawrence County Recycling / Solid Waste Department, PA Cleanways of Butler / Lawrence Counties Key Person Interviewees Focus Group Organizations Audubon Pennsylvania Bartramian Audubon Society Friends of McConnell’s Mill Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Wild Waterways Conservancy Also, this project would not have been possible without the valuable input given by Lawrence County residents, as well the support of local government offi cials and DCNR. Th is project was fi nanced in part by a grant from the Th is project was funded in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation fund Pennsylvania Department of Community & Eco- under the administration of the Pennsylvania Depart- nomic Development, Land Use Planning Technical ment of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau Assistance Program. of Conservation and Recreation. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................. 7 What is a Greenway ........................................................................9 Why a Greenways Plan for Lawrence County? ..............................10 Preserving Lawrence County’s Defi ning Characteristics ..............11 Expanding the Economy ............................................................12 Protecting Sensitive Habitats ......................................................15 Sound Land Use and Sustainable Growth ..................................16 How is a Greenways Plan Developed? ...........................................17 Th ree-Step Process .....................................................................17 Public Participation....................................................................17 Purpose of the Greenways Plan ..................................................18 Goals and Objectives .................................................................19 Th e Greenways Plan as a Decision-Making Tool ........................19 CHAPTER 1: LAWRENCE COUNTY’S RESOURCES ....21 Gathering the Data .......................................................................23 Existing Planning Eff orts ..............................................................23 Natural Resources .........................................................................34 Sensitive Environmental Features Map .........................................45 Hydrologic Resources Map ............................................................49 Built Resources .............................................................................51 Recreation Features Map ..............................................................59 Cultural and Historical Amenties Map .........................................65 CHAPTER 2: THE GREENWAYS VISION .....................67 Th e Criteria ..................................................................................69 Th e Structure of the Network .......................................................70 Conservation Greenways ............................................................71 Conservation Corridors Criteria Map .......................................73 Conservation Greenways Descriptions and Priorities ..............76 Conservation Greenways Plan ..................................................77 Level of Recommended Protection .........................................86 Recreation and Transportation Greenways .................................86 Recreation Greenways Plan ......................................................91 Major Hubs............................................................................93 Minor Hubs ...........................................................................96 Points of Interest ....................................................................97 Recreation and Transportation Greenways Descriptions and Priorities ........................................................................100 Lawrence County Greenways Plan 5 Proposed Greenways Plan .......................................................113 CHAPTER 3: THE ACTION PLAN .............................115 Management Structure ...............................................................117 Greenways Management Options Matrix ................................119 A Successful Greenways Coordinator Should (...) .................122 Intergovernmental Cooperation ...........................................123 Th e DCNR Circuit Rider Program ......................................123 Administrative Budget ..........................................................125 Municipalities Drive Greenways Implementation .................127 Management Structure Chart .................................................131 Strategies for Implementation .....................................................133 Implementation Process Tables ................................................135 Advancing Individual Greenways Segments ..........................137 Land Conservation Tools ......................................................138 Acquisition Tools ...........................................................138 Regulatory Tools ............................................................144 Other Recommendations .....................................................150 CHAPTER 4: POTENTIAL PILOT PROJECTS ........... 161 Stavich Bike Trail Extension .............................................. 164 Neshannock Rail-Trail Beginning Segment ....................... 179 Shenango - Beaver Rivers Water Trail ................................ 189 Conservation-Based Ordinance: Mining Setback and Land Use Ordinances in Municipalities surrounding the Slippery Rock Creek Gorge ......................................... 199 APPENDICES Appendix A - Project Meeting Minutes Appendix B - Key Person Interviews Appendix C - DCNR Greenways Website Resource List Appendix D - Greenways Coordinator Job Descriptions Appendix E - Riparian Buff er Information Appendix F - Stream Protection (Example Ordinance) Appendix G - Conservation by Design (Example Ordinance) Appendix H - Overlay Zoning Districts (Example Ordinance) Appendix I - Natural Features Buff er (Example Ordinance) Appendix J - Woodlands Protection (Example Ordinance) Appendix K - Agricultural Pollution Control (Example Ordinance) Appendix L - Mandatory Dedication (Example Ordinance) Appendix M - Success Story: Falling Spring Greenway (Article) Appendix N - Shaping the Future: Township Zoning (Article) Appendix O - Keystone Active Zone (KAZ) 2006 Brochure 6 Lawrence County Greenways Plan Introduction WHAT IS A GREENWAY? The term “Greenway” was fi rst coined in the 19th century, and since that time has been defi ned in several ways. Some people think of greenways as primarily recreational, namely trails for hiking, jogging, biking, or canoeing/kayaking (often called water trails or “blueways”). For them, greenways are places that offer opportunities to experience the outdoors. For others, the purpose of greenways is primarily for conservation of undeveloped land containing important natural resources like forests, wetlands, and stream banks, along with the plants and animals that live there. Still others see greenways in aesthetic terms, preserving the pastoral countryside setting in rural areas, protecting outstanding natural features such as cliffs, overlooks, or river ravines, or establishing green landscapes in urban areas. All three of these ideas are embraced by the following all- encompassing defi nition, which is adapted from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Greenways Plan: Pennsylvania Greenways - An Action Plan for Creating Connections, and is embraced by this Greenways Plan: A greenway is a corridor of open space, varying greatly in scale, and incorporating or linking diverse natural, cultural, and scenic resources. Some greenways are recreational
Recommended publications
  • County of Butler Comprehensive Plan
    THE COUNTY OF BUTLER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PHASE I (RECONNAISSANCE REPORT) 1997 Prepared by the Butler County Planning Commission The preparation of th~sreport was financed in part through a State Planning Assistance Grant (SPAG) from the Department of Community and Economic Development, under the: provisions of Act 5A, approved June 30, 1995, as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, Strategic Planning and Program Operations Office. p James L. Kennedy, Chairman William L. McCarrier Glenn L. Anderson PlanninP Commission Jeffrey M. Thompson, Chairman Howard L. Graham Paul M. Montgomery Theodore J. Walwik Howie J. Pentony Frank E. Uhl Kenneth M. Thomas James F. Peters Daniel D. Santoro Planning Director David P. Johnston TABLE OF CONTENTS m History and Historic Preservation ........................................... HHPl Native American Prehistory ............................................ HHPl Heritage of the Native American Period ................................... HHP2 The Early Historic Period: Pre-Settlement ................................... HHP3 Heritage of the Native-White and Colonial Conflicts in Butler County ............."P4 PlaceNarnes ..................................................... HHP4 DonatiodDepreciation Lands ........................................ HHP4 Initial Settlement of the County, 1790-1860 ................................ HHPS The Heritage of the Era of Settlement in Butler County ....................... HHP7 The Industrial Revolution - 1860-1945 ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • 05/24/2019 BUTLER COUNTY LEGAL JOURNAL Vol. 28 No
    05/24/2019 BUTLER COUNTY LEGAL JOURNAL Vol. 28 No. 43 ESTATE NOTICES Estate of: Charles Louis Brochetti Notice is hereby given that in the estates of a/k/a: Charles L Brochetti the decedents set forth below the Register Late of: Slippery Rock PA of Wills has granted letters testamentary Executor: Ann E Sesti or of administration to the persons named. 150 Harrison Drive All persons having claims or demands Indiana PA 15701 against said estates are requested to make Attorney: Ronald W Coyer known the same, and all persons indebted SR Law LLC to said estates are requested to make 631 Kelly Blvd PO Box 67 payment without delay, to the executors Slippery Rock PA 16057 or administrators or their attorneys named below. Estate of: Joyce A Ciani _______ Late of: Buffalo Township PA Executor: Robin J Dickey FIRST PUBLICATION 300 Muddy Creek Drive Butler PA 16001 Estate of: Maria Abraham Executor: Robert L Ciani II Late of: Seven Fields PA 214 Cole Road Executor: Sylvia Herdt Sarver PA 16055 225 Adams Pointe Blvd Attorney: Laurel Hartshorn Esq Unit 9 PO Box 553 Mars PA 16046 Saxonburg PA 16056 Attorney: Nora C Peace 1501 Mount Royal Blvd Estate of: Virginia L Craska Glenshaw PA 15116 Late of: Mars PA Executor: Francis M Craska Jr Estate of: Erma Lee Bailie 9023 Audubon Drive a/k/a: Erma L Bailie Gibsonia PA 15044 Late of: Butler Township PA Attorney: Dawn A Botsford Executor: Anne Conn 373 Republic Street 237 Meadowbrook Drive Pittsburgh PA 15211 Cranberry Township PA 16066 Attorney: Michael J Pater Estate of: Doris Mae Hartman 101 East Diamond Street
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Connoquenessing Stormwater Planning Study
    LOWER CONNOQUENESSING STORMWATER PLANNING STUDY Submitted to: Submitted by: BUTLER COUNTY HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, INC. ATTN: Mr. Mark Gordon 200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 400 Butler County Government Center Cranberry Township, PA 16066 124 West Diamond Street 724.779.4777 Butler, PA 16003 Date: March 10, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 1 RATE CONTROLS ....................................................................................................................... 2 PROBLEM AREAS .................................................................................................................... 10 ADAMS TOWNSHIP ................................................................................................................. 12 BUTLER COUNTY ...................................................................................................................... 16 CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP ......................................................................................................... 18 EVANS CITY BOROUGH .......................................................................................................... 22 FORWARD TOWNSHIP ............................................................................................................ 25 HARMONY BOROUGH ........................................................................................................... 28 JACKSON TOWNSHIP ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence County
    LAWRENCE COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge restoration on State Route 4004 (Harbor/Edinburg Road) over Shenango BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Harbor/Edinburg Bridge River in Union and Neshannock Townships 3 $ 2,500,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 65 (Woodside Avenue ) over Squaw Run in Wayne BASE Bridge Replacement Woodside Avenue Bridge Township 1 $ 1,100,000 1 1 0 Bridge rehabilitation on PA 288 (Wampum Avenue ) over B&P Railroad in Wayne BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Wampum Avenue Bridge Township 2 $ 7,500,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 65 (Second Street) over B & P Railroad in the City of BASE Bridge Replacement PA 65 (Second Street) Bridge Ellwood 2 $ 6,200,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Pulaski Road Bridge Bridge rehabilitation on Pulaski Road over Deer Creek in Pulaski Township 3 $ 1,000,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2001 (Savannah Road) over McKee Run in BASE Bridge Replacement Savannah Road Bridge over McKee Run Shenango Township 3 $ 1,500,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 3001 (South Main Street) over Branch of BASE Bridge Replacement South Main Street Bridge over Branch of Hickory Run Hickory Run in Bessemer Borough 3 $ 2,000,000 1 1 0 Bridge rehabilitation on State Route 1015 (Liberty Road) over Jamison Run Branch BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Liberty Road Bridge in Plain Grove Township 3 $ 1,100,000 1 1 0 Superstructure replacement on Hemmerle Road over Beaver River Tributary in BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Hemmerle Road
    [Show full text]
  • LITTLE CONNOQUENESSING CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Butler County
    DRAFT LITTLE CONNOQUENESSING CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Butler County For Acid Mine Drainage Affected Segments Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection September 30, 2008 1 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................. 3 Directions to the Little Connoquenessing Creek Watershed...................................................... 7 Segments addressed in this TMDL............................................................................................. 7 Clean Water Act Requirements .................................................................................................. 8 Section 303(d) Listing Process ................................................................................................... 9 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL...................................................................................... 10 Watershed Background............................................................................................................. 10 AMD Methodology................................................................................................................... 12 TMDL Endpoints...................................................................................................................... 14 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS) ........................................................................................ 15 Allocation Summary................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATALYST July SRWC Meeting Has Been Cancelled
    July 2011 THE CATALYST SLIPPERY ROCK WATERSHED COALITION MONTHLY ACTIVITIES UPDATE THIS MONTH’S MEETING: Cancelled due to multiple schedule conflicts. Next meeting: 7 pm on Thursday 8/11/11 at Jennings Environmental Education Center, pizza and pop provided. 6/9/11 meeting attendance: B. Busler, C. Busler, M. Busler, S. Busler, D. Carney, C. Denholm, M. Dunn, V. Kefeli, B. Silvis, W. Taylor Update on the Slippery Rock Creek Watershed Conservation Plan (SRCWCP) By Laurie Popeck The final round of public meetings for the SRCWCP were com- pleted during the last week of June 2011. Meetings were con- ducted at two locations in the watershed. Representatives from the Slippery Rock Watershed Coalition, the SRCWCP Advisory Council, Stream Restoration Inc., BioMost, Inc., and Planning & Economic Development Association Inc. were in attendance. The final meetings provided the opportunity not only to discuss the plan but also to answer questions from the local stakeholders. Thanks again to the municipal officials of Slippery Rock Township and the Boyers Sportsmen’s Club for graciously allowing the use of their facilities. Thanks also to the public for attending the meetings as well as the Advisory Council members for their help throughout the project duration. A couple of weeks prior to the meetings, Laurie Popeck , SRCWCP Project Facilitator, was invited to be interviewed for the SRCWCP project by Dave Ma- larkey of radio WISR - AM 680 in Butler, PA. This was the second time that Dave welcomed Laurie to his program. Once again, he was a very knowledge- able host who asked great questions that helped to provide insights relating to the benefits of the SRCWCP to the stakeholders of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler County Natural Heritage Inventory, 1991
    BUTLER COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Lisa L. Smith, Natural Heritage Ecologist Charles W. Bier, Associate Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Paul G. Wiegman, Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Chris J. Boget, Data Manager Bernice K. Beck, Data Handler Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 316 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 July 1991 BUTLER COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 4 COUNTY OVERVIEW 9 PENNSYLVANIA NATURAL DIVERSITY INVENTORY 14 NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY METHODS 15 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 133 LITERATURE CITED 134 APPENDICES I. Federal and State Endangered Species Categories, Global and State Element Ranks 135 II. County Significance Ranks 141 III. Potential Natural Heritage Inventory Form 142 IV. Recommended Natural Heritage Field Survey Form 143 V. Classification of Natural Communities in Pennsylvania (Draft) 144 LIST OF TABLES PAGE 1. Summary of sites in order of relative county significance 20 2. Important managed areas protecting biotic resources in Butler County 24 3. Butler County municipality summaries 27 Tables summarizing USGS quadrangles Baden 116 Barkeyville 37 Butler 103 Chicora 93 Curtisville 125 East Butler 90 Eau Claire 41 Emlenton 44 Evans City 108 Freeport 128 Grove City 34 Harlansburg 75 Hilliards 51 Mars 119 Mount Chestnut 86 Parker 48 Portersville 77 Prospect 81 Saxonburg 100 Slippery Rock 63 Valencia 122 West Sunbury 57 Worthington 97 Zelienople 113 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE 1. USGS quadrangle map index of Butler County 25 2. Municipalities of Butler County 26 3 INTRODUCTION Butler County possesses a wealth of natural resources including its flora, fauna, and natural habitats such as forests, wetlands, and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Annandale - Hallston Hydrologic and Property Study
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ANNANDALE - HALLSTON HYDROLOGIC AND PROPERTY STUDY SLIPPERY ROCK CREEK MINE DRAINAGE PROJECT SL 110-4-101.1A BUTLER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Prepared by GWIN, DOBSON & FOREMAN, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALTOONA, PA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ANNANDALE - HALLSTON HYDROLOGIC AND PROPERTY STUDY SLIPPERY ROCK CREEK MINE DRAINAGE PROJECT SL 110-4-101.1A BUTLER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ANNANDALE NO. 2 MINE Introduction The purpose of this report is to investigate the property and hydrology that will be affected by the sealing of the Annandale No. 2 Mine Complex in Marion and Venango Townships in Butler County. The proposed sealing of the mine will dramatically abate mine acid drainage that presently flows into Seaton Creek; one of the main tributaries (and worst polluters) of Slippery Rock Creek. The preparation of this report included identification of the property lines, verification of subsequent mineral rights, locating and sampling water sources (wells and springs) and delineation of the hydrologic area that will be affected by the proposed mine sealing. The accompanying map of the area, shown with the above information, is included for reference. Geology The Annandale No. 2 Mine Area is underlain by sedimentary rocks which reach a maximum thickness of about 12,000 feet. This sedimentary succession ranges in age from Cambrian through Pennsylvanian. Surface rocks in the vicinity are of the Pennsylvanian Age. They have been divided, in ascending order, into the Pottsville, Allegheny and Conemaugh Groups. The stratigraphic sequence as related to coal is associated with the Allegheny Group. The formation is approximately 280 feet thick and is at or near the surface in the northern half of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-State Trails Initiative
    18 County Workshop Report PA/WV/OH DRAFT March 29, 2011 Tri-State Trails Initiative Tri-State Trails Initiative March 29, 2011 The National Park Service – River, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program Ohio and West Virginia Field Offices coordinated the Tri State Trail Workshop on Tuesday, March 29, 2011, from 12:30-5pm. The purpose of the meeting was to build upon efforts started in 2002 and continue to make connections across state lines, to work with multiple groups to update existing and proposed trail maps, identify gaps, communicate needs and concerns, share successes and challenges and continue local efforts as part of a larger system of linking trails. The focus was on trail corridors across three states and eighteen (18) counties bordering Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia. The counties included in Pennsylvania: Beaver, Crawford, Erie, Greene, Lawrence, Mercer, Washington; in Ohio: Ashtabula, Belmont, Columbiana, Jefferson, Mahoning, Monroe, Trumbull; and in West Virginia: Brooke, Hancock, Marshall, and Ohio. All types of trails were included in the discussion -- land and water trails, motorized and non-motorized trails. Within this report… Introductions notes – organizations represented and trail efforts Breakout groups - challenges, successes, key stakeholders, opportunities and next steps Combined challenges Combined next steps Plus/Delta of the workshop for future planning OrganizationsSpokesperson represented introduce groupsand contact represented information or absent but important 2 | Page Tri-State Trails Initiative March 29, 2011 Each county, from north to south was given five minutes to discuss what organizations are represented and briefly report on trail efforts. ASHTABULA (OH) Western Reserve Greenway is the northern end of Great Ohio Lake to River Greenway (GOLRG), and runs to the southern border to Trumbull and Mahoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017
    TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Shan Li Master Thesis.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School School of Forest Resources AN EXAMINATION OF PETROMYZONTIDAE IN PENNSYLVANIA A Thesis in Wildlife and Fisheries Science by Shan Li 2012 Shan Li Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science May 2012 The thesis of Shan Li was reviewed and approved* by the following: Jay R. Stauffer Distinguished Professor of Ichthyology Thesis Advisor Paola C. Ferreri Associate Professor of Fisheries Management Donna J. Peuquet Professor of GIScience Jay R. Stauffer Distinguished Professor of Ichthyology Chair of Graduate Program *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Lampreys are one of the two jawless vertebrate groups in Agnatha. The adult’s life is shorter than the larval stage which is known as “ammocoete”. They are either in parasitic forms or non-parasitic forms. Parasitic adults attach to other species, rely on the blood or flesh of the hosts, and non-parasitic adults die after spawning. There is little historical data on lampreys because ammocoetes are filter feeders who are in the sediment, and captures of adults were all by chance. The objectives I achieved in this study were included: 1) Compiled all existing PA historical data (prior to 1990s) of lampreys and created database and distribution maps for each species; 2) Sampled historical sites for native lampreys in 2011 by using backpack designed for ammocoetes, documented changes in lamprey communities at the watershed scale; 3) Conducted substrate sampling at sites where ammocoetes were present, analyzed substrate size preferred by ammocoetes; 4) Identified collections to species, compared the current data and historical data to see the presence and absence of native lamprey species and value the changes of distributions.
    [Show full text]