Satan's Transition from a Heavenly Council Member to the Ruler of Pandaemonium, in an Oral Examination Held on August 31, 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“BETTER TO REIGN IN HELL, THAN SERVE IN HEAVEN”: SATAN’S TRANSITION FROM A HEAVENLY COUNCIL MEMBER TO THE RULER OF PANDAEMONIUM A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts In Religious Studies University of Regina By Allan Edwin Charles Wright Regina, Saskatchewan September, 2012 Copyright 2012: Allan E.C. Wright UNIVERSITY OF REGINA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINING COMMITTEE Allan Edwin Charles Wright, candidate for the degree of Master of Arts in Religious Studies, has presented a thesis titled, "Better to Reign in Hell, than Serve in Heaven": Satan's Transition From a Heavenly Council member to the Ruler of Pandaemonium, in an oral examination held on August 31, 2012. The following committee members have found the thesis acceptable in form and content, and that the candidate demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of the subject material. External Examiner: Dr. Tim Hegedus, Wilfrid Laurier University Supervisor: Dr. William Arnal, Department of Religious Studies Committee Member: Dr. Jacoba Kuikman, Department of Religious Studies Committee Member: Dr. Franz Volker Greifenhagen, Department of Religious Studies Chair of Defense: Dr. Ulrike Hardenbicker, Department of Geography *Not present at defense UNIVERSITY OF REGINA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINING COMMITTEE Allan Edwin Charles Wright, candidate for the degree of Master of Arts in Religious Studies, has presented a thesis titled, "Better to Reign in Hell, than Serve in Heaven": Satan's Transition From a Heavenly Council member to the Ruler of Pandaemonium, in an oral examination held on August 31, 2012. The following committee members have found the thesis acceptable in form and content, and that the candidate demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of the subject material. External Examiner: Dr. Tim Hegedus, Wilfrid Laurier University Supervisor: Dr. William Arnal, Department of Religious Studies Committee Member: Dr. Jacoba Kuikman, Department of Religious Studies Committee Member: Dr. Franz Volker Greifenhagen, Department of Religious Studies Chair of Defense: Dr. Ulrike Hardenbicker, Department of Geography *Not present at defense Abstract In this thesis, I argue that Satan was not perceived as a universal malevolent deity, the embodiment of evil, or the “ruler of Pandaemonium” within first century Christian literature or even within second and third century Christian discourses as some scholars have insisted. Instead, for early “Christian” authors, Satan represented a pejorative term used to describe terrestrial, tangible, and concrete social realities, perceived of as adversaries. To reach this conclusion, I explore the narrative character of Satan selectively within the Hebrew Bible, intertestamental literature, Mark, Matthew, Luke, Q, the Book of Revelation, the Nag Hammadi texts, and the Ante-Nicene fathers. I argue that certain scholars’ such as Jeffrey Burton Russell, Miguel A. De La Torre, Albert Hernandez, Peter Stanford, Paul Carus, and Gerd Theissen, homogenized reconstructions of the “New Testament Satan” as the universalized incarnation of evil and that God’s absolute cosmic enemy is absent from early Christian orthodox literature, such as Mark, Matthew, Luke, Q, the Book of Revelation, and certain writings from the Ante- Nicene Fathers. Using Jonathan Z. Smith’s essay Here, There, and Anywhere, I suggest that the cosmic dualist approach to Satan as God’s absolute cosmic enemy resulted from the changing social topography of the early fourth century where Christian “insider” and “outsider” adversaries were diminishing. With these threats fading, early Christians universalized a perceived chaotic cosmic enemy, namely Satan, being influenced by the Gnostic demiurge, who disrupts God’s terrestrial and cosmic order. Therefore, Satan transitioned from a “here,” “insider,” and “there,” “outsider,” threat to a universal “anywhere” threat. i Acknowledgements I would first like to acknowledge my appreciation to the Faculty of Graduate Studies at the University of Regina for their financial support in the form of Graduate Teaching Assistantship and Graduate Studies Scholarship awards. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Franz Volker Greifenhagen and Dr. Jackie Kuikman. Special thanks to my supervisor and academic mentor Dr. William Arnal for all the feedback, support, and conversations. I would also like to thank the entire Department of Religious Studies for their stimulating classes and discussions during my time as an undergraduate and graduate student. Another special thanks to Dr. Leona Anderson for providing various opportunities and employment within the department. Also, I would like to thank the Religious Studies graduate students, especially Jesse Bailey, Sarah Hagel, Ian Brown, and Alex Tkach, for their encouragement, contributions, and endless hours of invigorating academic and non- academic discussions. I would also like to thank my entire family for their love, support, encouragement, and patience. Especially, my mother Juverna Wright, my father Nicholas Wright, my grandparents Norman Amundson (RIP), Jean Amundson, Derek Wright, and Sheila Wright (RIP). Also, thanks to my friends for their continual support. Last, but especially not least, I would like to thank my be all and end all, my rock, Ernesta Vileitaite-Wright. This project would have not been possible without your contributions and endless amount of love, support, patience, and encouragement. I cannot express how truly fortunate I am to have you in my life. Moreover, I eagerly anticipate the next chapter in our lives with the birth of our baby girl. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this thesis to grandma, Jean Amundson, and to my Nana Sheila Wright (RIP) for all their encouragement, love, and support throughout my academic journey and my entire life. iii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………i Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….ii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………....iii Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter 1: Near Eastern Narratives which Influenced the Development of Satan. 6 Mesopotamia…………………………………………………………………... 7 Canaan………………………………………………………………………..... 10 Egypt………………………………………………………………………….... 11 Greek…………………………………………………………………………... 14 Persian…………………………………………………………………………. 17 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………... 27 Chapter 2: Satanic Figures within the Hebrew Bible and Intertestamental Literature……………………………………………………………………………… 32 Chapter 3: New Testament Representations of Satan……………………………… 64 Mark………………………………………………………………………….... 65 Matthew………………………………………………………………………... 74 Luke-Acts………………………………………………………………………. 85 John…………………………………………………………………………… 99 Paul……………………………………………………………………………. 107 The Book of Revelation..…………………………………………………….. 112 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………. 117 Chapter 4: Second and Third Century Representations of Satan………………... 120 The Nag Hammadi Texts and the Demiurge……………………………….. 120 Ante-Nicene Fathers…………………………………………………………. 127 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………. 135 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………. 139 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………….. 149 iv Introduction An apology for the Devil: It must be remembered that we have heard only one side of the case. God has written all the books. --- SAMUEL BUTLER, Note Books The Satan of John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost is a familiar character. He leads a group of angels in a rebellion against God which results in their expulsion from heaven. With the rebellious group of angels banished below to the dark void of chaos, Satan has now become the ruler over “Pandaemonium.” “Pandaemonium” is a term Milton coined by combining the Greek terms pan and daimones simply meaning “all,” or “every,” demons. In response to God’s punishment, Satan tempts Eve to eat the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden; this, of course, leads to the “fall of man.” This portrayal of Satan has become the dominant perception of Satan within popular discourse. However, the notion of an “evil” figure within the Hebrew Bible, intertestamental, and early Christian literature is much more complex than Milton’s characterization. I will discuss the narrative character of Satan in these ancient texts in order to show that Satan was not perceived as a universal malevolent deity, the embodiment of evil, or the “ruler of Pandaemonium” within first century Christian literature or even within second and third century Christian discourses as some scholars have insisted.1 For example, Jeffrey Burton Russell claims that the Devil within the New Testament is not a peripheral character and is not a symbolic representation in any manner. He states that 1 See Jeffrey Burton Russell, The Devil: Perceptions of Evil from Antiquity to Primitive Christianity, (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1977), 221-249. Miguel A. De La Torre & Albert Hernandez, The Quest for the Historical Satan, (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2011), 74-92. Peter Stanford, The Devil: A Biography, (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1996), 55-71. Paul Carus, The History of the Devil and the Idea of Evil: From the Earliest Times to the Present Day, (New York: Land’s End Press, 1969), 157- 193. Gerd Theissen as summarized by Nienke Vos, “Demons and the Devil in Ancient and Medieval Christianity,” Demons and the Devil in Ancient and Medieval Christianity, Eds. Nienke Vos and Willemien Otten, (Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2011), 8-17. 1 Satan is God and