DOCSLIB.ORG

Population, Food Security, Nutrition and Sustainable Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population, Food Security, Nutrition and Sustainable Development WFUNA International Model United Nations E(WIMUN)/CN.9/2020/3 ​ ​ Economic and Social Council Distr.: Limited Jan 7, 2020 Original: English Commission on Population and Development Fourth Session New York, 31 Jan - 3 Feb 2020 Item 2 Population, food security, nutrition and sustainable development Report of the Economic and Social Council Summary The right to adequate living standards for the people was first addressed as a fundamental human right in the Universal Declaration on the Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition and has always been considered as one of the most important rights throughout history. However, this right in many underdeveloped regions of the world has been violated due to extreme poverty, conflict and climate change. By 2015, a significant progress has been achieved, but it is still far from elimination as the UN proposed “Zero Hunger Challenge” in 2012. Today, over 800 million people are considered undernourished. It is also estimated that there will be over 2 billion people who will fall into starvation by the year 2050. As it is highly linked to the Sustainable Development Goals, urgent collaborations by different stakeholders, in particular, governments, foreign aid, food producers and consumers, have to be taken effectively to ensure the eradication of hunger and malnutrition. 1/21 WFUNA International Model United Nations E(WIMUN)/CN.9/2020/3 I. Introduction 1. The very first international conference specifically on food security and nutrition was held at Hot Springs, US in 1943. It mainly expressed its concern on world food security, established an interim commission on food security and nutrition, and expressed the need for founding a permanent commission specifically dealing with 1 the short-term and long-term negative consequences brought by malnutrition. 2. The Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) was established in the year of 1945. The first founding goals are to sustainably improve the efficiency of agricultural systems, as well as to substantially increase the overall food supply for the world population. Strategically, it approaches to the allocation of natural as well as artificial resources such as fishery, forestry, vegetation, etc. It also closely links to the elimination of rural poverty by tackling its goal to smallholder farmers. (It also pays its attention to the smallholder farmers with their family-based farms which takes approximately 90% of the farmers in the world.) Since its foundation, the FAO has always worked closely with governments, institutions, organisations, providing expertise and strategic advice to ensure the productivity and sustainability of food 2 supply. 3. The World Food Conference convened by the UN General Assembly adopted resolution 3180 on November 16th, 1974. The Universal Declaration on the ​ ​ Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition. This resolution was further endorsed by the ​ General Assembly in resolution 3348. The thesis of this declaration stated, “Every ​ man, woman and child has the inalienable right to be free from hunger and malnutrition in order to develop fully and maintain their physical and mental faculties.” The declaration expressed its strong concern from the international ​ community by tackling food security issue with international human rights and geopolitical factors within a region, to achieve the physical and mental wellness of 3 individuals. 4. The international community has expressed its strong concern in the Second International Conference on Nutritions (ICN) that took place in Rome, Italy in the year of 2014. The final outcome of this Conference was the Rome Declaration on ​ Nutrition, as well as the Framework for Action as a guidance for its implementation. ​ ​ In the declaration, it recognises the negative consequences possibly caused by malnutrition onto individuals, market and society. It emphasizes the necessity of eradicating world hunger for future sustainable development. It also urges international and different forms of governmental intervention into the food system to 4 further ensure sufficient food supply for all. The Rome Declaration on Nutrition ​ serves also as a guideline for the future relative declarations and resolutions. 1 FAO, http://www.fao.org/3/p4228e/p4228e04.htm ​ 2 FAO, Strategic Objectives, http://www.fao.org/3/a-mg994e.pdf 3 OHCHR, Universal Declaration on the Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/EradicationOfHungerAndMalnutrition.aspx 4 Rome Declaration on Nutrient, http://www.fao.org/3/a-ml542e.pdf, 2014 ​ ​ 2/21 WFUNA International Model United Nations E(WIMUN)/CN.9/2020/3 5. The UN General Assembly listed the eradication of world hunger as well as poverty in its Millennium Development Goals. It specified its detailed goal in 1.C “Halve, 5 between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger”. It resulted in a significant fall in the percentage of undernourished people, from 23.3 6 percent in 1990-1992 to 12.9 percent in 2014-2016. 6. The “Zero Hunger Challenge” (ZHC) was launched by the former United Nations Secretary General Mr. Ban Ki-moon, supported by the Food and Agricultural Organisation, World Food Programme, International Fund for Agricultural Development, UN Children’s Fund, the World Bank and Bioversity International. The ultimate goal for this challenge is to fully eradicate malnutrition. It is detailed into 5 main goals, namely, a. All food systems are sustainable from production to consumption, b. An end to rural poverty: double small-scale producer income and productivity, c. Adapt all food systems to eliminate loss or waste of food, d. Access adequate food and healthy diets, for all people, all year round, e. And end to malnutrition in all its forms. This challenge was set to be more “people centered”, implementing with social justice and basic human rights as the guideline. It pointed out that this goal would not be fully achieved in isolation, hence, international cooperation for the benefit of the 7 people is an essential element. 7. In 2015, United Nations Member States adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in which the eradication of world hunger was listed as a single goal (Goal 2). 2.1 By 2030, end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round. 2.2 By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons. 2.3 By 2030, double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food ​ producers, in particular women, indigenous peoples, family farmers, pastoralists and fishers, including through secure and equal access to land, other productive resources and inputs, knowledge, financial services, markets and opportunities for value addition and non-farm employment. 5 Millennium Development Goals, https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/poverty.shtml ​ 6The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf 7 Zero Hunger Challenge, UN, https://www.un.org/zerohunger/node/20 ​ 3/21 WFUNA International Model United Nations E(WIMUN)/CN.9/2020/3 2.4 By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient ​ agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strengthen capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters and that progressively improve land and soil quality. 2.5 By 2020, maintain the genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants and farmed and ​ domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at the national, regional and international levels, and promote access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, as internationally agreed. 2.A Increase investment, including through enhanced international cooperation, in ​ rural infrastructure, agricultural research and extension services, technology development and plant and livestock gene banks in order to enhance agricultural productive capacity in developing countries, in particular least developed countries. 2.B Correct and prevent trade restrictions and distortions in world agricultural ​ markets, including through the parallel elimination of all forms of agricultural export subsidies and all export measures with equivalent effect, in accordance with the mandate of the Doha Development Round. 2.C Adopt measures to ensure the proper functioning of food commodity markets and ​ their derivatives and facilitate timely access to market information, including on food reserves, in order to help limit extreme food price volatility. 8. It is detailed in 5 more goals, targeting on the elimination of world hunger and diseases brought by micronutrient deficiencies. It also aims the completion of sustainable farming, genetically-diverse seeds, plants, as well as the productivity of agriculture. It has pointed out three main approaches for implementation, which include increasing investment in agricultural market, preventing restrictions in agricultural trade, and adopting several measures to ensure the stabilization of food 8 commodity market all the time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Food Systems Concept and Framework
    Sustainable food systems Concept and framework WHAT IS A SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEM? Food systems (FS) encompass the entire range of actors and their interlinked value-adding activities involved in the production, aggregation, processing, distribution, consumption and disposal of food products that originate from agriculture, forestry or fisheries, and parts of the broader economic, societal and natural environments in which they are embedded. The food system is composed of sub-systems (e.g. farming system, waste management system, input supply system, etc.) and interacts with other key systems (e.g. energy system, trade system, health system, etc.). Therefore, a structural change in the food system might originate from a change in another system; for example, a policy promoting more biofuel in the energy system will have a significant impact on the food system. A sustainable food system (SFS) is a food system that delivers food security and nutrition for all in such a way that the economic, social and environmental bases to generate food security and nutrition for future generations are not compromised. This means that: – It is profitable throughout (economic sustainability); – It has broad-based benefits for society (social sustainability); and – It has a positive or neutral impact on the natural environment (environmental sustainability). A sustainable food system lies at the heart of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Adopted in 2015, the SDGs call for major transformations in agriculture and food systems in order to end hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition by 2030. To realize the SDGs, the global food system needs to be reshaped to be more productive, more inclusive of poor and marginalized populations, environmentally sustainable and resilient, and able to deliver healthy and nutritious diets to all.
    [Show full text]
  • What Factors Account for State-To-State Differences in Food Security?
    What Factors Account for State-to-State Differences in Food Security? By Judi Bartfeld, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Rachel Dunifon, Cornell University, Mark Nord, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Steven Carlson, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Information Bulletin No. 20. Abstract States differ in the extent to which their residents are food secure— meaning that they have consistent access to enough food for active, healthy living. The prevalence of food security in a State depends not only on the characteristics of households in the State, such as their income, employment, and household structure, but also on State-level characteristics, such as average wages, cost of housing, levels of participation in food assistance programs, and tax policies. Taken together, an identified set of household-level and State-level factors account for most of the State-to-State differences in food security. Some State-level factors point to specific policies that are likely to improve food security, such as policies that increase the supply of affordable housing, promote the use of Federal food assistance programs, or reduce the total tax burden on low-income households. Keywords: Food security, food insecurity, hunger, very low food security, State predictors of food security 1800 M St, NW Washington, DC 20036 November 2006 1 EIB-20/What Factors Account for State-to-State Differences in Food Security? Introduction Food security, defined as access by all people at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life, is one of several conditions necessary for the Nation’s population to be healthy and well nourished.
    [Show full text]
  • Food, Climate, and the Green New Deal: a Social Contract for Justice?
    Our research and analysis is fueled by people like you. Help keep Food First an independent think-and-do tank today at foodfirst.org/support. INSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY SPRING 2019 VOLUME 25 • NUMBER 1 Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ed Markey unveil the Green New Deal Resolution. Photo courtesy of Senate Democrats (CC BY 2.0) Food, Climate, and the Green New Deal: A Social Contract for Justice? By Eric Holt-Giménez and Heidi Kleiner The Green New Deal has taken the country by storm. The non-bindingResolution calls for massive public investment in green jobs and green infrastructure to achieve “net-zero greenhouse gas emissions through a fair and just transition for all communities and workers… to be accomplished through a 10-year national mobilization.”1 Unsurprisingly, the Green New Deal (GND) introduced by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA), has been ignored by industry, mocked by Republicans and vilified in the conservative media.2 Though it has nearly 70 co-sponsors, powerful mainstream Democrats are tiptoeing around it, perhaps because they are nervous about angering the fossil fuel industry. And while the GND has been overwhelmingly celebrated by environmentalists, social justice groups are giving it a cautious welcome.3 Ocasio-Cortez and Markey’s GND all farmers and society. A social contract follows on prior initiatives from was established.”9 economist Thomas Friedman,4 the British Green New Deal Group,5 The Green New Deal, crafted by the United Nations
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Hunger and Achieving Food Security for All Answers to Guiding Questions -UNFPA
    Ending hunger and achieving food security for all Answers to guiding questions -UNFPA System Closely related SDGs Selected SDGS with Selected SDGs selected for HLPF synergies to where trade-offs harness need to be mitigated Ending hunger and achieving food security for all: 2, 3, 17 1, 4, 5, 6, 8 6, 13, 14, 15 strengthening livelihoods of the poor, ensuring sustainable and healthy food production systems and improving the lives of all V Guiding questions 1. Which areas and socio-economic groups are especially vulnerable to poor nutrition and food insecurity and what are ways to ensure that food systems transformations leave no one behind? Key messages: - There are striking interlinkages between nutrition and food security, poverty, gender, and reproductive health- with girls, adolescents and women especially vulnerable to malnutrition given the negative impacts of gender inequality and other forms of discrimination on individual food security and access to nutrients; - Lack of universal access to optimal nutrition among girls, pregnant women and infants has long lasting and intergenerational consequences for sexual and reproductive health and development, resulting in negative pregnancy outcomes and lifelong consequences that include lower cognitive development for the newborn, delayed maturation, extended adolescent growth periods, as well as adult-onset conditions, such as obesity and diabetes; - Poverty and food insecurity are among key drivers of sexual bartering, survival sex, sex work and child marriage. The special nutritional needs among girls and young women needs to be prioritized as part of a comprehensive approach to breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty and gender discrimination, including by ending child marriage, discouraging early childbearing, and assuring that all young women have the opportunity to grow into adulthood before starting a family.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Food Systems
    United Nations Food Systems Summit 2021 Scientific Group https://sc-fss2021.org/ Food Systems Summit Brief Prepared by Research Partners of the Scientific Group for the Food Systems Summit, May 2021 Climate Change and Food Systems by Alisher Mirzabaev, Lennart Olsson, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Prajal Pradhan, Marta Guadalupe Rivera Ferre, Hermann Lotze-Campen 1 Abstract Introduction Climate change affects the Climate change affects the functioning of all the components of food functioning of all the components of food systems, often in ways that exacerbate systems1 which embrace the entire range existing predicaments and inequalities of actors and their interlinked value-adding between regions of the world and groups in activities involved in the production, society. At the same time, food systems are aggregation, processing, distribution, a major cause for climate change, consumption, and recycling of food accounting for a third of all greenhouse gas products that originate from agriculture emissions. Therefore, food systems can (including livestock), forestry, fisheries, and and should play a much bigger role in food industries, and the broader economic, climate policies. This policy brief highlights societal, and natural environments in nine actions points for climate change which they are embedded2. At the same adaptation and mitigation in the food time, food systems are a major cause of systems. The policy brief shows that climate change, contributing about a third numerous practices, technologies, (21–37%) of the total Greenhouse Gas knowledge and social capital already exist (GHG) emissions through agriculture and for climate action in the food systems, with land use, storage, transport, packaging, multiple synergies with other important processing, retail, and consumption3 goals such as the conservation of (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Contributing to Food Security and Sustainability in a Changing World
    Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture Contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world platform fo r agrobiodiversit y PA Rr e s e a r c h Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture Contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world OUTCOMES OF AN EXPERT WORKSHOP HELD BY FAO AND THE PLATFORM ON AGROBIODIVERSITY RESEARCH FROm 14–16 APRIL 2010 IN ROME, ITALY Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research platform fo r agrobiodiversit y PA Rr e s e a r c h Hosted by Bioversity International The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-106748-2 All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Community-Based Sustainable Food System
    Building a Community-Based Sustainable Food System Case Studies and Recommendations Building a Community-Based Sustainable Food System Case Studies and Recommendations University of Michigan Urban & Regional Planning Capstone Project April 2009 Executive Summary The current global food system, while highly efficient in production, has produced many undesirable social and environmental impacts. Producers’ profit margins have significantly decreased over the last thirty years and agri- business organizations with global networks of production, processing, and distribution now dominate the food industry. Changing economic conditions have decreased the economic viability of small and medium-sized farms, increased fossil fuel consumption, reduced the number of farm-related local business and processing facilities and made the profession of farming less attractive to younger generations. In large part, food production has been removed from our communities, diminishing our collective knowledge of our region and agrarian practices. While the current food system offers consumers inexpensive food, the amount of processing, lengthy distribution channels, and global trade patterns favor prepared food that is calorie-rich but nutritionally deficient. Another challenge is that conventional food retail sources, such as grocery stores, are inequitably distributed throughout our communities. While middle and upper income neighborhoods have many grocery stores, cities such as Detroit, are often characterized as urban food deserts. In addition to large grocery chains and small markets, farmers markets, community supported agriculture (CSA) programs, and community gardens are emerging food suppliers within our communities that offer benefits for all and may specifically address the unmet needs of low-income residents. The food we eat has direct implications on our long-term health and the existing inequitable patterns of food retail disproportionally impact our poorest residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Food Security the Importance of Wild Fisheries for Food Security and Nutrition APRIL 2016
    Fishing for Food Security The Importance of Wild Fisheries for Food Security and Nutrition APRIL 2016 This publication was produced for review by theUSAID United – FISHING States FOR Agency FOOD for International0 Development. It was preparedSECURITY by Measuring Impact. Table of Contents I. PREFACE 03 II. OVERVIEW 04 III. FISHERIES AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT 07 IV. KEY OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION 24 V. CASE STUDIES 28 VI.THE IMPORTANCE OF FISHERIES IN NINE FEED THE FUTURE PRIORITY COUNTRIES 32 VII.SOURCES 52 Figures 1. Global Fishing in 2010 06 2. Fish contributions to animal protein supply 09 3. Voluntary submissions of marine fisheries catch data by FAO member countries and estimations including all fisheries known to exist 10 4. Reconstructed global catch by fisheries sectors 11 5. Evidence base, poverty reduction benefits, and importance to biodiversity for specific conservation mechanisms 18 6. The biological effects of fully protected, no-take marine reserves 21 7. Summary of potential biomass and financial gains that can be produced through sustainable fisheries management 22 8. Rebuilding of Kenyan small-scale fisheries through gear restrictions and closed area management 23 9. Nutrition and food security statistics for Bangladesh 33 10. Nutrition and food security statistics for Cambodia 35 11. Nutrition and food security statistics for Ghana 37 12. Nutrition and food security statistics for Kenya 39 13. Nutrition and food security statistics for Liberia 41 14. Nutrition and food security statistics for Malawi 43 15. Nutrition and food security statistics for Mozambique 45 16. Nutrition and food security statistics for Senegal 47 17. Nutrition and food security statistics for Tanzania 49 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security Implications of Global Marine Catch Losses Due to Overfishing
    J Bioecon (2010) 12:183–200 DOI 10.1007/s10818-010-9090-9 Food security implications of global marine catch losses due to overfishing U. Thara Srinivasan · William W. L. Cheung · Reg Watson · U. Rashid Sumaila Published online: 18 August 2010 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010 Abstract Excess fishing capacity and the growth in global demand for fishery products have made overfishing ubiquitous in the world’s oceans. Here we describe the potential catch losses due to unsustainable fishing in all countries’ exclusive eco- nomic zones (EEZs) and on the high seas over 1950–2004. To do so, we relied upon catch and price statistics from the Sea Around Us Project as well as an empirical rela- tionship we derived from species stock assessments by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In 2000 alone, estimated global catch losses amounted to 7–36% of the actual tonnage landed that year, resulting in a landed value loss of between $6.4 and 36 billion (in 2004 constant US$). From 1950–2004, 36–53% of commercial species in 55–66% of EEZs may have been overfished. Referring to a species-level database of intrinsic vulnerability (V) based on life-history traits, it appears that susceptible species were depleted quickly and serially, with the aver- age V of potential catch losses declining at a similar rate to that of actual landings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10818-010-9090-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. U. T. Srinivasan (B) Pacific Ecoinformatics and Computational Ecology Lab, Berkeley, CA 94702, USA e-mail: [email protected] W.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Planning Integration with Food Security and Nutrition (2015)
    FANTA III FOOD AND NUTRITION TECHNICAL A SSISTANCE Family Planning Integration with Food Security and Nutrition Reena Borwankar and Shelly Amieva Recognizing the urgent need to address both the direct planning (Borwankar and Amieva 2015). As a companion and underlying causes of malnutrition, the U.S Agency for to this review, the Health Policy Project conducted two International Development (USAID) Multi-Sectoral Nutrition literature reviews summarizing the empirical evidence on Strategy 2014–2025 calls for the increased availability why it is important to integrate these services (Smith and of family planning and reproductive health services Smith 2015; Naik and Smith 2015). This brief summarizes (USAID 2014). To escalate the U.S. Government’s global the findings from the FANTA desk review. commitments in this area and to optimize the effectiveness of food security and nutrition programs, there is a need to understand how best to integrate family planning with food security and nutrition programming and a need to raise This brief summarizes the findings of a FANTA report, awareness about the importance of family planning for Desk Review of Programs Integrating Family Planning improved food security and nutrition outcomes. However, to with Food Security and Nutrition. It provides a date there has been limited peer reviewed literature and a snapshot of the various ways development programs dearth of documentation on programmatic experiences of are integrating family planning with nutrition and food integrating family planning with food security and nutrition security interventions. The brief offers lessons learned (Brickley et al. 2011; Maternal and Child Health Integrated and promising practices for programming, provides Program [MCHIP] 2010; Ringheim 2012; USAID 2011; recommendations for USAID, and sheds light on gaps Yourkavitch 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Principles to Guide the Transition to Sustainable Food Systems
    IPES-Food: 10 Principles to guide the transition to Sustainable Food Systems The International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems, IPES-Food, is a new initiative aimed at informing the debate on how to reform food systems. IPES-Food has identified 10 key principles to guide the urgently-needed transition to sustainable food systems. They include principles to shape the sustainable food systems of the future, as well as principles for the types of knowledge and analysis that are required to support this transition. These principles will underpin the work of IPES-Food over the coming years. What types of knowledge and analysis are needed to support the transition? • Holistic & systemic. Hunger, obesity, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, the pressures on smallholder livelihoods, cultural erosion, workforce exploitation and other problems in food systems are deeply inter-connected. Holistic thinking is needed in order to identify systemic ‘lock-ins’, and to find integrated solutions and potential levers of change. • Power-sensitive. Analysis of food systems must not ignore the differential power of actors to influence decision-making and to set the terms of debate for reform. Power relations and the political economy of food systems must take center-stage. • Transdisciplinary. Knowledge must be co-produced with farmers, food industry workers, consumers, entrepreneurs, and other social actors and movements who hold unique understanding of food systems. Actors from fields such as public health, environment and rural development also have much to contribute to the debate on food systems reform. • Critically engaged. Producer organizations, retailers and other actors in food chains must be fully engaged in defining and developing sustainable food systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Education in the Anthropocene: Toward Public and Planetary Health
    Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development ISSN: 2152-0801 online https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org VIEWPOINT Nutrition education in the Anthropocene: Toward public and planetary health Jennifer Lynn Wilkins * Syracuse University and Cornell University Submitted February 20, 2020 / Published online May 4, 2020 Citation: Wilkins, J. L. (2020). Nutrition education in the Anthropocene: Toward public and planetary health. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(3), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2020.093.026 Copyright © 2020 by the Author. Published by the Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems. Open access under CC-BY license. Abstract need to ensure that such competencies are ad- Nutrition education has traditionally focused pri- dressed in course content. Advocates need to be marily on food and nutrition knowledge, motiva- vigilant to ensure that sustainability, food systems, tions, and skills that facilitate behavior change. This and community aspects related to nutrition and essay argues that while this content remains an es- diet are incorporated into policy. The relevance of sential foundation for nutrition education, is it no nutrition education will depend upon the degree to longer sufficient. In the Anthropocene—the cur- which this shift is successful. rent distinct geological period during which human activity is the dominant influence on climate and Keywords the environment—the goal of nutrition framework Anthropocene, Diet, Food Skills, Health is twofold: public health and planetary health. This Outcomes, Nutrition Education approach requires that competencies in food sys- tems, agriculture, and policy be included in the ed- Disclosure ucation and training of food and nutrition The views expressed in this reflective essay are those of the education practitioners and researchers.
    [Show full text]