DOCSLIB.ORG

The Vilna Gaon, Part 2 (Review of Eliyahu Stern, the Genius)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Vilna Gaon, Part 2 (Review of Eliyahu Stern, the Genius) The Vilna Gaon, part 2 (Review of Eliyahu Stern, The Genius) The Vilna Gaon, part 2 (Review of Eliyahu Stern, The Genius) by Marc B. Shapiro Continued from here. Another reference by the Gaon to the Guide – in this case it is only attributed to him – is found in his comment to Bava ,בירא דשתית מיניה לא תשדי בי קלא) Kamma 92b (commenting on which has been published in a number of different sources, most conveniently in the commentaryAnaf Yosef to Ein Yaakov, Bava Kamma 92b. The Gaon quoted the Guide as saying that if you find one good thing in a book you shouldn’t deride it for any other nonsense in it.[1] This must refer to Maimonides’ comment in the Introduction to the Guide where he writes: “All into whose hands it [the Guide] fall should consider it well, and if it slakes his thirst, though it be only one point from among the many that are obscure, he should thank God and be content with what he has understood.” When it comes to the Guide and the Vilna Gaon, there is also a reference in the Gaon’s commentary to Esther 1:18. Here are the pages from the Mossad ha-Rav Kook edition. As R. Meir Mazuz pointed out,[2] the Gaon is referring to Guide 1:54. However, as you can see, the editor didn’t know this and thus didn’t provide the source.[3] Here is another example where a learned editor did not know a source in the Guide. In R. Abraham Sofer’s edition of Meiri, Hibbur ha-Teshuvah, p. 170, the Meiri quotes Maimonides, and as you can see in note 4, Sofer comments, “I don’t know where.” Maimonides words are not in any of his halakhic writings, which is why Sofer didn’t know about them, but they do appear in Guide 3:8. Returning to the Gaon and Maimonides, when it comes to sex the Gaon’s view parallels that of Maimonides in theGuide , although I don’t know if we can speak of influence. Maimonides famously spoke of the sense of touch as being a “disgrace to us.”[4] The Gaon actually had the same opinion in that he regarded sex as something to be loathed and a necessary evil. Only with regard to the spiritual elites did he see something intrinsically positive in it.[5] שדברי העולם הזה בעצם מאוסים, כמו האכילה, שנוטל מאכל ועושה פרש ורעי וכן המשגל, אבל התכלית, מה שבא מזה הוא טוב, כמו תכלית האכילה שיהא חזק ללמוד תורה, ותכלית המשגל להיות בנים צדיקים וטובים, וזהו תכלית ופעולה. וז”ש בהצדיקים לא מיבעי שהתכלית מזה אצלם טוב, אלא אפילו הפעולה עצמה הוא לחיים, שהן מכוונין בזה ואכילתן כקרבן ממש. וכן בכל דבר. Yet even when dealing with the righteous, one can only imagine how the Gaon would have reacted if he had seen the following text, from R. Solomon of Karlin, Shema Shelomo (Jerusalem, 1956), p. 96 (sippurim no. 59), in which we see how an unnamed hasidic figure said that he needed sex every day, a statement that shocked his bride to be.[6] Here is another example where the Gaon’s has the same view as Maimonides in the Guide. Tamid 1:1 states: “The priests kept watch [throughout the night] at three places in the Temple.” Why? In the Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Beit-ha-Behirah 8:1, Maimonides says that this is just a matter of showing respect to the Temple, since there is no fear that anything will be stolen. In his commentary to Tamid 1:1 (found in the Vilna ed.), the Gaon explains that the guards were there to prevent unauthorized entry. In Guide 3:45 Maimonides also offers this explanation (in addition to mentioning that the watch was for glory and honor). Regarding Meiri’s Hibbur ha-Teshuvah, mentioned above, in Saul Lieberman and the Orthodox I mentioned the notes at the end of this volume by Louis Ginzberg, notes that have not yet been removed from newer printings. I neglected to mention this dedication to Ginzberg at the beginning of the volume. As for Ginzberg’s notes at the end of Hibbur ha-Teshuvah, A reader sent me the following, which shows how Yeshivat Ner Israel’s beit midrash copy of the book is “decorated”. Regarding Sofer’s edition of Hibbur ha-Teshuvah, there is one other important point I must mention. The volume first appeared in 1950 and was subsequently reprinted by Sofer, with no changes to the text of the Meiri or the pagination. This reprint is what appears in the multivolumeBeit ha- Behirah that everyone purchases. However, this is unfortunate, because the 1950 edition is far superior. Here is the title page of the first edition, which was published by Yeshiva University. This edition contains a lengthy and valuable introduction by R. Samuel Mirsky, which deals with various aspects of the Meiri. Furthermore, Mirsky included thirty pages of important notes, many of them textual, that are vital for anyone who studies the Hibbur ha-Teshuvah. (Mirsky also calls attention to the passage in Guide 3:8, which as I noted above, Sofer did not know about.[7]) Quite apart from the 1950 edition, in Talpiot 4 (5710), pp. 417ff., Mirsky published a number of chapters from Hibbur ha-Teshuvah and his notes often call attention to things not mentioned by Sofer. It would therefore be helpful if a new edition ofHibbur ha-Teshuvah was published and included the notes of both Sofer and Mirsky. This new edition should also include the many pages of notes by Yehudah Preis-Horeb and R. Dov Berish Zuckerman that appeared in Talpiot 5 (5712), pp. 880ff., which are also quite valuable. I can’t explain why Sofer did not include at least Mirsky’s notes when he republished the book. Fortunately, the first edition is available on hebrewbooks.org. Finally, here is an example where the Gaon’s position is not merely similar to that of Maimonides in theGuide , but is clearly influenced by the latter.[8] In Yahel Or the Gaon states:[9] כי כל השמות אינן רק משותפין ומושאלין מפעולותיו . רק שם הוי”ה . והוא שם העצם שאינו מושאל מפעולה רק (מורה) על הויותו תמיד והיותו מעצמו Here is what Maimonides writes in Guide 1:61 (Ibn Tibbon translation). It is obvious that the Gaon was influenced in this matter by Maimonides’ words. כל שמותיו יתעלה הנמצאים בספרים כולם נגזרים מן הפעולות, וזה מה שאין העלם בו, אלא שם אחד, והוא יו”ד ה”א וא”ו ה”א, שהוא שם המיוחד לו יתעלה, ולזה נקרא שם המפורש, ענינו, שהוא יורה על עצמו יתעלה הוראה מבוארת אין השתתפות בה . להיותו מורה על עצמו יתעלה, מאשר לא ישתתף אחד מן הברואים בהוראה ההיא P. 109. Stern mentions the report that after the Gaon’s death on Sukkot, when the hasidim continued to celebrate, three hasidim were killed by mitnagdim. It is hard to know whether there is any truth to this story, or to the report of hasidim killing a mitnaged.[10] Unfortunately, in our day we have seen haredi Judaism in Israel descend to a level unimaginable even ten years ago.[11] Harsh rhetoric, which on occasion has led to real violence, is now routine, and the rabbis who use the harsh, and often hateful, speech are never called to account for their actions.[12] It is only a matter of time before we see a religiously motivated murder, and we have already had close calls, including a stabbing at Ponovezh. Seeing what has occurred in recent months, we can understand why some people might conclude that R. Akiva was right on target when he told his son, “Do not dwell in a town whose leaders are talmidei hakhamim” (Pesahim 112a). In a previous post I already quoted Yeshayahu Leibowitz’s comment that we תלמידי know the Sages had a sense of humor since they stated Along these lines, many decades ago an .חכמים מרבים שלום בעולם unnamed rabbi explained why the blessing reads הפורש סוכת שלום עלינו ועל כל עמו ישראל ועל ירושלים The problem with this formulation is that there is no need for Jerusalem to be singled out after mentioning the entire people of Israel. The explanation given is that since Jerusalem has more disputes than anywhere else (and today we could add Bnei Brak) it therefore needs a special mention when asking God to spread over us his shelter of peace.[13] R. Kook actually claims that the Jewish people are more apt to be involved in internal disputes than any other people. In Kevatzim mi-Ketav Yad Kodsho (Jerusalem, 2006), p. 43, he writes: ישראל הם עלולים יותר לפירוד ומחלוקת מכל אומה, מפני שריבוי הצביונים שמתחלקים בעמים רבים, כלולים בישראל ביחוד. I am writing these words not long after a man attacked R. Aharon Leib Steinman, which could easily have caused R. Steinman’s death. So as not to put all the blame on one side, does anyone have any doubt that if Degel ha-Torah was running the show that R. Shmuel Auerbach would right now be under house arrest or sitting in jail? I say this only because I assume that the rhetoric directed against him is hyperbole, because if is not hyperbole, then we should assume that if Degel ha-Torah was in charge he would have been executed by now. Can the rabbis who use this sort of rhetoric really claim that they are innocent when an individual decides to take their words literally and kill someone, even a great Torah scholar? Didn’t these rabbis learn the lesson of the Rabin assassination, that if you call someone arodef (and thus hayav mitah), someone might very well take you up on this? As for throwing people out of kollels because they didn’t vote for Degel ha-Torah, any kollel that does so should be ineligible for Israeli government money.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Halachic and Hashkafic Issues in Contemporary Society 143 - Having a Secular Name Ou Israel Center - Fall 2019
    5779 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 1 sxc HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 143 - HAVING A SECULAR NAME OU ISRAEL CENTER - FALL 2019 A] WHAT IS A ‘JEWISH NAME’? •There are different levels as to how ‘Jewish’ a name is. Consider the difference between the following: - A Hebrew name from the Tanach 1 eg Avraham, Yehonatan, Esther etc. - A Tanach name which has been shortened or adapted eg Avi, Yoni, Esti, Sari. - A Tanach name which is not normally used - eg Ogli, Mushi, Mupim, Chupim, Ard, Kislon. What about Adam? - The English translation of a Hebrew name eg Abraham, Jonathan, Deborah. - A non-biblical Hebrew name which is commonly used by observant Jews eg Zvi, Ari, Rina, Shira. - A non-Hebrew name which is only used by observant Jews eg Velvel, Mottel, Mendel, Raizel, Sprintze, Kalonimus Kalman. - A non-Jewish name which has been explicitly accepted by Jews - eg Alexander - A non-Jewish name which is commonly used by Jews and non-Jews eg Andrew, Jason, Susan, Lucy. - A non-Jewish name which has connotations relating to other religions eg Paul, Luke, Mary. - A non-Jewish name which is directly connected to another religion eg Chris, Mohammed, Jesus. B] NAMES, WORDS AND REALITY «u¯kt r e h rJt kf u u·kt r e Hv n ,u ­t r k o ºstvk t tcHu o hºnXv ;ugkF ,t u v s&v ,'H(kF v )nst*vi n ohek,t wv r. Hu 1. (ugcy hpk uk ,utbv una tuv :wuna tuvw aurhpu - e"sr) /u *n J t01v v­H( Jp1b o4st*v yh:c ,hatrc At the very outset of creation, the animals were brought to Adam so that he could name them.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Bibliography of Important Haggadah Literature,Marc B
    Initial Bibliography of Important Haggadah Literature Initial Bibliography of Important Haggadah Literature by Eliezer Brodt All are aware of the proliferation of Haggadahs. Every year more and more are published thus making it difficult to know which versions are worthwhile. Thus, in this post I intend to focus on a listing a small bibliographical list of seforim relating to the Haggadah that are, in my mind, some of the most important ones. In light of the fact I am going to select a few Haggadahs from the many, a caveat of sorts is in order. When discussing the “best” books it is good to keep in mind the comments of R. Eliyahu ben Avrohom Shlomo HaKohen (d. 1729) in hisShevet Mussar (ch. 28) who writes the following regarding affinities towards particular seforim: ותראה בני אדם שלומדים ענין אחד מדרוש או ממוסר בספר אחד ואין טועמים ממנו ואין נרשם הדבר בשכלם. והענין או דברי המוסר בעצמו לומדים אותו בספר אחר הבא בשינו לשון ובמלות שונות וטועמים ממנו ונרשם הענין בדעתם ומגדלים ומשבחים אותו ענין. ובהפך אם אחד למד ענין בספר שלמד זה וטעם הוא אינו טועם כטעם הספר שלא טעם חבירו. טעמו של דבר שכל הטועם מענין הספר שלמד יש לו איזה שורש לנשמתו בנשמת מחבר הספר כיון שהם משורש אחד לכן טועם לשונו ונרשמים הדברים בליבו. לא כן מספר שלמד ולא טעם אף על פי שהענין אחד משום שאין לנשמתו שום קורבה ואחיזה בנשמת המחבר אותו ספר. Basically, according each persons taste of a sefer could be different and the reason has to do with some sort of connection with the author of the sefer.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Nachman Seltzer Presents the “DISCO RABBI” the Incredible Life of Rav Yitzchak Dovid Grossman of Migdal Haemek
    A PROJECT OF THE פרשת וישב שבת פרשת שמיניחנוכה כ״ו כ"ז ניסןכסלו תשפ״א At the 5781 DECEMBERAPRIL 10, 2021 12, 2020 ISSUE #36 Shabbos RABBI YITZCHOK WEEKLY INSPIRATION AND INSIGHT ADAPTED FROMTable CLASSIC ARTSCROLL TITLES HISIGER, EDITOR DEDICATED BY MENACHEM AND BINAH BRAUNSTEIN AND FAMILY DESIGN & LAYOUT: L’ILLUI NISHMAS RAV MOSHE BEN RAV YISSOCHOR BERISH AND MARAS YENTA BAS YISROEL CHAIM AVIVA KOHN Parashah THE ELDERS The Torah Treasury by Rabbi Moshe M. Lieber קָרָ א מֹשֶׁ ה לְאַהֲ רֹן וּלְבָ נָיו וּלְזִקְ נֵי יִשְׂרָ אֵ ל. Moshe summoned Aharon and his sons, and the elders of Yisrael. “Rebbi Akiva says: The Jewish young and old being indistin- counted that people are compared to a bird. guishable. The wisdom and before his fa- Just as a bird cannot fly without life experience of older people ther’s demise, he had asked that wings, so the Jewish people are gives them the ability to guide his son, Rav Shmuel, succeed helpless without their elders” and advise with wisdom and him. One of the local dayanim, (Vayikra Rabbah 11:8). reason. Young people lack this who had desired the position, The Midrash (Bereishis Rab- insight. said that he did not believe Rav bah 65:4) teaches that origi- Avraham was afraid that if Yaakov. Rav Yaakov responded, nally, Yitzchok Avinu looked the young and the old looked “Even though the command re- exactly like his father, garding the offerings THE ABILITY OF Avraham. Avraham was relevant only to EACH GENERATION asked Hashem to the kohanim, Moshe TO SUCCESSFULLY make him look older, summoned the elders RISE ABOVE ITS so that people would as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vilna Goan and R' Chaim of Volozhin
    Great Jewish Books Course The Vilna Goan and R’ Chaim of Volozhin Rabbi Yechezkal Freundlich (גאון ר' אליהו – A. Vilna Goan – R’ Eliyahu ben Shlomo Zalman Kremer (Gr”a a. 1721 – 1797, born and died in Vilna (capital of Lithuania), which was known at the time as the “Jerusalem of Lita” because of its great Torah scholarship, and he was the undisputed crown jewel. B. Genius amongst geniuses a. Fame as a prodigy began at young age and by early 20s was already recognized as leading Sage in a city of Sages and the address for the most difficult questions b. Photographic memory – though it is said he really had “no memory” because everything was fresh before him as if he just learned it i. Legend: by 4 had memorized all of Tanach. At seven he was taught Talmud by R’ Moses Margalit, by eight, he was studying astronomy during his free time. From the age of ten he continued his studies without the aid of a teacher due to his knowledge already surpassing all his teachers, and by the age of eleven he had committed the entire Talmud to memory. c. Torah study was the supreme value and of paramount importance d. Combined with astounding diligence and dedication to learning Torah i. For at least 40 years (until 70) he never slept more than 2 hours out of 24, and he never slept more than 30 minutes consecutively. ii. Competed the entirety of Torah every 30 days e. Breathtaking range of knowledge. i. there was no subject he did not know intimately: mathematics, astronomy, science, music, philosophy and linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Halachic Controversy Concerning the Israeli Census
    THE JOURNAL OF HAlACHA The Halachic Controversy Concerning the Israeli Census Rabbi J. David Bleich T he United States conducts a census each decade for the pur­ pose of determining the population of the country and of its various geographic areas. Quite apart from the matter of reapportionment of congressional districts, the demographic information compiled in this manner is of highly significant value in economic planning. Other information elicited in the course of taking the national census provides valuable information regarding many facets of changing sociological conditions. Censuses are similarly undertaken by other countries for the selfsame reasons. There have been no indications that any sector of the Jewish community in the diaspora has demurred with regard to participation in a national census. Not so in the State of Israel. Newspaper accounts describing the recently completed census undertaken by the government of Israel - the fourth since the establishment of the state of Israel ­ are replete with reports of refusal to participate on the part of certain groups within the Orthodox community and of rabbinic disagreement with regard to the permissibility of participation. The census of 5743 was, however, by no means the first occasion on which this matter received the attention of rabbinic Rosh Yeshiva, Rabbi Isaac E1chanan Theological Seminary; Tenzer Professor of Jewish Law and Ethics, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University THE ISRAELI CENSUS 63 scholars. The earliest item dealing with the question of a modern­ day census appears to be a responsum written by R. Ben-Zion Uziel, Mishpetei Uzi'el, Choshen Mishpat, lnyanim Kellaliyim, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosh Hashanah Reflections| RABBI ELI GEWIRTZ
    HIGH HOLIDAY EDITION | TISHREI 5769 | SEPTEMBER 2008 Rosh Hashanah Reflections | RABBI ELI GEWIRTZ ’m often asked how a 21st century on the will of Hashem. The Haftorah hungry… Hashem brings Jew is expected to relate to Rosh describes the painful story of the child- death and gives life… He raises Hashanah as a Day of Judgment. less Chana; how her husband’s other the needy from the dust… for IBuying the apples and honey and ar- wife Penina tormented her over her not through strength does ranging to attend High Holiday services inability to conceive, and how her man prevail. is relatively easy. But the concept of prayers were finally answered on Rosh (Samuel 2:4-2:9) a Day of Judgment, especially for the Hashanah when she was told by the uninitiated, is hard to grasp. prophet Eli that she would be blessed Chana makes clear that everything is in with her first child. the hands of Hashem and that, as the Recent world events, the collapse of disclaimer goes: past performance is some of the biggest financial institutions, The commentaries offer many insights no guarantee of future results. Chana’s a mammoth hurricane that wreaked into the connection between Rosh co-wife Penina learned this lesson the many billions of dollars in damages, a Hashanah and Chana’s story. On the hard way. As Chana gave birth to five mini-war in Georgia (which may turn most basic level it provides a message children, Penina lost five of her own. out to be not-so-mini), and ominous about hope and about the power of threats of a multi-regional (did some- prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Shabbos Hagadol Drasha 5777
    The Moral Challenge of Our Most Expensive Holiday Rabbi Ariel Rackovsky Shabbos HaGadol 5777 Once again and as usual, I am indebted to my dear friend Rabbi Ben Skydell of Congregation Orach Chaim of Manhattan’s Upper East Side. Rabbi Skydell and I have been preparing Shabbat Hagadol and Shabbat Shuva Derashot together for several years now; he always does the lion’s share of the work and his incisive readings and excellent research always help refine and expand our ideas. May we go from strength to strength! I also want to acknowledge my parents, for whom this is the first time hearing me deliver a Shabbos HaGadol Derasha. I look forward to many more opportunities in the future to share Torah with you, in their presence. Two simple words. The headstone of the great Rav Chaim Soloveitchik says nothing about his illustrious career as Rosh Yeshiva in the Volozhin Yeshiva, as the author of a remarkable work on the Rambam or as the originator of a brand new analytical system of Talmud study. Instead, his epitaph pays tribute to a man who was known as much for his personal refinement and elevated character as he was for his brilliant mind. The two words are Rav Chessed- a pun, as it can be translated both as “a man of great ​ ​ kindness” or “A Rabbi of kindness.” An example of both Rav Chaim’s brilliance and compassion can be found in the story of a woman who came to him before Pesach with a halachic question. Is it permissible, she asked, to use milk instead of wine for 1 the four cups at the Seder? Rav Chaim explained to her that it is not; it is a biblical obligation to drink four cups of wine at the Seder, interspersed at strategic intervals throughout the journey of the Haggadah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Exclusion in Judaism Hassidim Vs
    The Politics of Exclusion in Judaism Hassidim vs. Mitnagdim I. (Extremely) Brief Historical Overview (via Wikipedia) Shabbetai Tzvi, other spellings include Sabbatai Ẓevi, Shabbetai ,שַׁבְּתַׁי צְּבִ י :Sabbatai Zevi, (Hebrew .1 Ẓevi, Sabbatai Sevi, and Sabetay Sevi in Turkish), (August 1, 1626 – c. September 17, 1676 in Dulcigno (present day Ulcinj), Montenegro) was a Sephardic Rabbi and kabbalist who claimed to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah. He was the founder of the Jewish Sabbatean movement. At the age of forty, he was forced by the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV to convert to Islam. Some of his followers also converted to Islam, about 300 families who were known as the Dönmeh (aka Dönme) (converts). 2. Frankism was an 18th-century to 19th-century Jewish religious movement centered around the leadership of the Jewish Messiah claimant Jacob Frank, who lived from 1726 to 1791. At its height, it claimed perhaps 50,000 followers, primarily Jews living in Poland and other parts of Eastern Europe. Unlike traditional Judaism, which provides a set of detailed guidelines called halakha that are scrupulously followed by observant Jews and regulate many aspects of life, Frank claimed that "all laws and teachings will fall" and asserted that one's most important personal obligation was the transgression of every boundary. August 27, 1698 (18 Elul) – May 22, 1760), often רבי ישראל בן אליעזר) Rabbi Yisroel ben Eliezer .3 called Baal Shem Tov or Besht considered to be founder of "Hassidic" Judaism [also known as the Baal HaTanya,[1 ,( שניאור זלמן מליאדי :Shneur Zalman of Liadi (Hebrew .4 (September 4, 1745 – December 15, 1812 O.S.), was an Orthodox Rabbi, and the founder and first Rebbe of Chabad, a branch of Hasidic Judaism, then based in Liadi, Imperial Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hakhel Community Awareness Bulletin
    THE HAKHEL COMMUNITY AWARENESS BULLETIN Reviewed by HaRav Yisroel Belsky, Shlita Volume IV, Number 1 Adar 5764 Opportunity Knocks. If you start learning Mishnayos Megillah on the fourth day of Adar (Thursday, February 26th) and learn just three Mishnayos a day (after Maariv, with your son, etc.), you will complete the entire mesechta on Purim, and if you then continue to learn Mishnayos Pesachim starting on Purim (it is a mitzvah to begin learning Hilchos Pesach on Purim, as brought in the Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 429; Mishne Berurah seif katan 2), you will complete Mishnayos Pesachim before Pesach! Yeshivas Mordechai HaTzadik. B’EH, Hakhel intends to once again host the great yeshivah- Yeshivas Mordechai HaTzadik in America nationwide. If your shul would like to participate in this Purim learning opportunity (Yes—learning on Purim!), please promptly contact 718-253-5497. Pre-Washed Vegetables. The proliferation of pre-washed vegetables with colorful stickers in Hebrew affixed to their packaging has created confusion in the Kashrus community. Romaine lettuce, which until recently was thought to be off-limits to the serious Kosher consumer, is now available in overabundance. A more careful review of the Kashrus standards behind the pre-washed vegetable proliferation may reveal some shocking results: · Double and triple hashgachos may in some cases mean that the one or two hashgachos are relying on a third hashgocha to check the vegetables. · Of the two to three tons that may be processed in a given period, 100 pounds or less may actually be checked for infestation. · One hashgacha, because of pressure from a national manufacturer, has changed its supervision schedule from Hashgocha Temidis to a once-every-ten-days visit (notwithstanding that truckloads of Romaine may have arrived and been processed in the interim without anyone checking them).
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Yeshivishe Joke Has It That Demons, Like the Fairy Tinker Bell, Exist When and Only When People – Or Specifically the Greatest Rabbis – Believe in Them
    The old yeshivishe joke has it that demons, like the fairy Tinker Bell, exist when and only when people – or specifically the greatest rabbis – believe in them. So demons existed in Talmudic times, but vanished in the face of Maimonides, only to be resurrected by the Vilna Gaon (according to Mitnagdim) or the Baal Shem Tov (according to Chassidim). This joke to some extent derives from a statement on Pesachim 110b about at least some aspects of demonology: כללא דמילתא: כל דקפיד - קפדי בהדיה, ודלא קפיד - לא קפדי בהדיה. ומיהו למיחש מיבעי. The principle of the matter is: Anyone who is concerned – demons are concerned about him; and anyone who is not concerned – demons are not concerned about him. But one is required to be cautious1. Rashbam explains that demons must have some power even over the unconcerned – which means that they must have some objective reality – or else Chazal would simply have commanded us not to believe in them, and thus eliminated any risk from them. But one can easily respond that Chazal knew that not everyone would disbelieve on command. Both the joke and the Talmudic statement express similar ambivalences. The Talmudic statement expresses a decent concern for conventional wisdom; the joke is nervous about attributing error to the great. The joke, conveniently, does not take any position as to whether demons exist in our day – that would presumably depend on what the great rabbis of our day believe, and in turn, on whom we identify as such. The question for Modern Orthodoxy is: Can we give Torah authority to rabbis who believe in attributing physical effects to demonic causes, or does that create too great a gulf of sensibility? Now past belief in demons did not stem from ignorance or a rejection of empiricism, nor does a contemporary belief in demons necessarily stem from such.
    [Show full text]
  • Publica Tions
    A PROJECT OF THE פרשת וישב פרשת שבת בשלח-שירהחנוכה י״זכ״ו שבטכסלו תשפ״א At the 5781 DECEMBERJANUARY 12,30, 2020 2021 ISSUE #27 Shabbos RABBI YITZCHOK WEEKLY INSPIRATION AND INSIGHT ADAPTED FROMTable CLASSIC ARTSCROLL TITLES HISIGER, EDITOR DEDICATED BY MENACHEM AND BINAH BRAUNSTEIN AND FAMILY DESIGN & LAYOUT: L’ILLUI NISHMAS RAV MOSHE BEN RAV YISSOCHOR BERISH AND MARAS YENTA BAS ROCHEL LEAH AVIVA KOHN Parashah Tu B'Shevat CLOSE TO TORAH MAN AS Messages from Rav Pam by Rabbi Sholom Smith A TREE The Light and the Splendor by Rabbi Daniel Glatstein וַ יֹּאמֶ ר מֹשֶׁ ה אֶ ל אַהֲ רֹן קַ ח צִ נְצֶ נֶ ת אַחַ ת וְתֶ ן The Avnei Neizer, the great posek, rosh שָׁמָּ ה מְ לֹא הָ עֹמֶ ר מָ ן וְהַ נַּ ח אֹתוֹ לִפְ נֵי ה' לְמִשְׁמֶרֶ ת לְ דֹרֹתֵ יכֶ ם. Moshe said to Aharon, “Take one jar and put a full omer yeshivah, and first rebbe of the Socha- of mann into it; place it before Hashem for a safekeeping tchover Chassidic dynasty, would inter- for your generations” (16:33). pret the pasuk of “Ki ha’aretz eitz hasadeh Moshe instructed Aharon - Is the tree of the field a man” (Devarim to take one portion of mann 20:19) to mean that man is likened to a and place it in the Aron next to tree, and his peiros, fruits, are his chiddu- the Sefer Torah. This served as shei Torah, his original Torah ideas and an eternal reminder of Hash- teachings. Just as on Tu B’Shevat the sap em’s love for His people and rises up inside the tree, enabling a new how He sustained them in the crop of fruit, so too, there is a renewal Wilderness for forty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Hakashrus
    SPECIAL EXPANDED EDITION ww ww M AZEL TOV! VOL. v f / NO. 10 ELUL 5777 - TISHREI 5778/ SEPT.-OCT. 2017 s xc YOMIM NORAIM EDITION THE Daf a K ashrus H OUR 250th ISSUE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE OU RABBINIC FIELD REPRESENTATIVE על הנסים... שעשית לאבותינו בימים ההם בזמן הזה VERY often in the course of the past 25 This special expanded issue contains many have approached me over the years in person years I have written an introduction to the articles from gifted writers and kashrus or by other means of communication, to yearly Daf HaShana compilation of The Daf experts who are either currently, or were express the pleasure and educational value previously, employed by the OU. I take this HaKashrus which included a Dvar Torah they have had from reading The Daf. associated with that year’s Daf HaShana vol- opportunity to thank everyone who contrib- ume’s number. uted articles to this issue and the total 250 May Hashem grant all of us to see, speedily issues of The Daf for their insightful and As we approach the publication of the 250th in our time, the fulfillment of the Nevuah of educational contributions. Kosher consum- Silver Issue of The Daf HaKashrus, the Micah (7:15) “As in the days when you left the ers, RFR’s, RC’s and communal rabbis owe a number 25 easily connects us to Chanukah, land of Mitzrayim I will show it wonders” – tremendous debt of gratitude to these writers כימי צאתך מארץ מצרים אראנו נפלאות the 25th day of Kislev.
    [Show full text]