Gruppe Nord 2012 Std 4 Mar 19.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gruppe Nord 2012 Std 4 Mar 19.Indd Gruppe Nord 2012 Standard The Kriegsmarine in World War II by Paul French with Tim Charlesworth, Michael W. Harris, Jay Wissmann Edited by Larry Bond and Chris Carlson Maps by Tim Schleif published by The Admiralty Trilogy Group Copyright ©2008, 2012, 2015, 2019 by the Admiralty Trilogy Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. Made in the USA. No part of this game may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the pub- lisher. Command at Sea is a registered Trademark by Larry Bond, Christopher Carlson, and Edward Kettler, for their WW II tacti- cal naval wargame. The Admiralty Trilogy is a registered Trademark by Larry Bond, Christopher Carlson, Edward Kettler, and Michael Harris for their Twentieth-Century tactical naval gaming system. The designers of Command at Sea and Gruppe Nord are prepared to answer questions about the game system. They can Samplebe reached in care of [email protected]. Visit their website at http://www.admiraltytrilogy.com. file This version of Gruppe Nord has been updated to include all corrections from errata through February 2019. Cover: German destroyer Z 24, by Mal Wright, with layout by Tim Schleif 2 Gruppe Nord Table of Contents Page Table of Contents 2 Acknowledgments 3 Annex Notes 3 Graf Spee’s Greatest Battle 13 Dec 39 Graf Spee vs. cruisers 5 Wounded Raider 17 Dec 39 Graf Spee tries to escape 7 The Norwegian Campaign Norway as a Target of Strategies 8 Action off Skomvoer, First Capital Ship Action 9 May 40 German vs. British battlecruisers 8 We've Come to Protect You - The Occupation of Narvik 9 May 40 Destroyers vs. coast defenses 10 First Battle of Narvik, Part 1: So Far, So Good 10 May 40 German vs. British destroyers 13 First Battle of Narvik, Part 2: The Withdrawal 10 May 40 German vs. British destroyers 15 Fight in the Fjord: The Noose 10 May 40 German destroyers break out 16 Needless Loss: The Sinking of HMS Glorious 8 Jun 40 The Germans find a carrier 18 Gallant Defense: The Attack on Convoy HX-84 5 Nov 40 German BC attacks a convoy 20 Excessive Caution 8 Feb 41 Two German battlecruisers vs. a heavily defended convoy 22 Lost Opportunity? 7 Mar 41 Two German battlecruisers vs. a heavily defended convoy 24 Thor’s Hammer Thor vs. Alcantara 28 Jul 40 Raider vs. merchant cruiser 27 Thor vs. Carnarvon Castle 5 Dec 40 Raider vs. merchant cruiser 27 Thor vs. Voltaire 4 Apr 41 Raider vs. merchant cruiser 28 Operation Sportpalast 7 Mar 42 German heavy units attack a defended convoy 29 Definitely No Survivors 14 Oct 42 Allied forces vs. an escorted raider 31 Operation Stonewall 28 Dec 43 Night action with light forces vs. two cruisers 32 Bismarck An introduction to the Bismarck scenarios 36 First Blood 24 May 41 The most famous capital ship duel in history 36 Wake-Walker’s Plan 24 May 41 Surface attack on Bismarck 39 Airstrike from Victorious 24 May 41 Air torpedo attack 41 Sting of the Swordfish: Airstrike from Ark Royal 26 May 41 Air torpedo attack 43 Picadores: Vian’s Night Destroyer Attack 26 May 41 Night destroyer attack on Bismarck 43 Finale - The Death of Bismarck 27 May 41 Battleship engagement 44 Valiant Futility: The British Destroyer Assault During Operation Cerebus 12 Feb 42 Destroyers vs. escorted battlecruisers 45 The Loss of Edinburgh 2 May 42 Destroyers vs. escorted cruiser 47 Operation Regenbogen: The Battle of the Barents Sea 31 Dec 42 Escorted battlecruisers attack an escorted convoy 48 The Death of Scharnhorst: The battle of North Cape 51 The First Cruiser Action 26 Dec 43 Cruisers intercept a battlecruiser 52 The Second Cruiser Action 26 Dec 43 Cruisers and destroyers pursue a battlecruiser 53 Bear at Bay 26 Dec 43 Battleship and escorts pursue a battlecruiser 54 Sidebars The Kriegsmarine 4 Norway as a Target of Strategies 8 German Merchant Raiders 26 The Bismarck Mystique 34 SampleExtracts from Prinz Eugen’s Diary file38 Gruppe Nord 3 Annexes Index of Ship Classes A-1 A Ships A-3 B Aircraft B-1 C Guns C1 & C2 Naval Surface and Coast Defense Guns C-1 C4 Naval AA Guns C-4 E ASW Weapons E1 Depth Charges E-1 E1a Surface Ship DC Attack Patterns E-1 E1c German Airborne ASW Bomb Attack Table E-1 F Torpedoes F-1 G Mines G-1 H Air Ordnance H1 Unguided Air Ordnance H-1 H2 Guided Air Ordnance H-2 H3 Aircraft Guns H-3 J Radars J1 Naval Radars J-1 J2 Land Radars J-2 J3 Aircraft Radars J-3 K Sonar K1 Search Sonars K-1 K1a Sonar Range Bands K-2 W Environment W-1 Y Ship Classifications (GNST) Y-1 Z Conversion Factors & Scales Z-1 Acknowledgements: Thanks to Tim Charlesworth, John Gresham, John Hall, Mike Harris, Pat Hreachmack, Christoph Kluxen, Peter Grining, Jim Sperling, Steve Thorne, and Jay Wissmann. Their work made this book possible. The 2012 Damage Point Standard: This version of Gruppe Nord has been updated to use the “2012 Standard” to calculate a ship’s damage points. This method, described in the April 2012 issue of the Naval SITREP (hence the name) matches historical results more closely than the older “2006 Standard” used in earlier versions of this supplement. All of the ship damage points in this supplement have been changed. Other corrections and updates have been made through- out the booklet as well, including adding a new scenario. The updated .pdf of Gruppe Nord is available as a free download to earlier purchasers. If you have purchased the print-on-demand edition, you will have to either purchase a new copy, or make pen and ink changes using the Damage Point Summary, available as a free download from The Wargame Vault and our website. It lists the damage points for all the ships in the Admiralty Trilogy system, as well as background on how we calculate damage points, and the new formula. If you are using ship data from more than one Admiralty Trilogy publication, make sure that the damage points have all been calculated using the 2012 Standard. Annex Notes: The information on the platforms, weapons, and sensors in this annex has been standardized so that it is compatible and consistent with all Admiralty Trilogy games. Equipment that was used in more than one era will have the same statis- tics in all games. The Annex designations are standardized for all three Admiralty Trilogy games: Fear God & Dread Nought, Command at Sea, and Harpoon. Gaps in the sequence are caused by annexes that are not applicable to the era or the product. If there is information in another Trilogy publication that conflicts with the data printed in this publication, use the infor- mation in the product with the newest copyright date, since new information and corrections can change statistics. If you have a question about the conflict, or about any other data listed, please contact us. Except for Annex A, systems are listed in their Annexes alphabetically, first by country, then by name. The ships in An- Samplenex A are listed in traditional order, with capital ships first, followed by minor combatants, submarines,file mine warfare craft, auxiliaries, then civilian vessels. An alphabetical list of ships by class name is provided on the next page. Systems listed in italics never entered service. They existed only in prototype or developmental form. The designers can be reached in care of [email protected]. 4 Gruppe Nord The Kriegsmarine At the start of the war, the German Navy was very modern, With German expansion in Europe and a realization that although rather small in comparison to the raw numbers of ultimately, Germany’s goals “could only be solved by means of Germany’s primary enemies of France and Great Britain. Until force,” the leadership made plans for strong surface navy. In 1938, Germany’s primary anticipated foe was France. 1938, the blueprint for German naval construction (Plan Z) The German Navy in 1939 had four missions; to defend was completed. It provided for a significant naval force to be the coasts of Germany, defend German and attack enemy sea completed by 1947. Designed to fight Britain not by a massed communications, support land and air operations along the fleet engagement, but by threatening her widespread shipping coast, and serve as a political or strategic instrument of war. This lanes – the plan was to build a fleet that could fight through an later mission was mainly aimed at ensuring the neutrality and anticipated British blockade and then cripple her commerce. compliance of the Scandinavian nations. The fleet would include 8 battleships, 5 battlecruisers, 4 The German strategy at sea was to avoid a traditional, aircraft carriers, 8 heavy cruisers, 13 light cruisers, 22 scout Mahanian naval battle, but to attack the British or Allied cruisers, 68 destroyers, 90 torpedo boats, 249 U-boats, and merchant shipping with surface raiders and U-boats in virtually scores of support craft. However, with outbreak of the war in every theater of operations. This would spread limited Royal Navy 1939 and early successes on land, Plan Z was tabled and its assets to the far corners of the globe. Destroying Allied shipping resources used elsewhere. would also weaken the Allied struggle on land against the German At the start of the war, the German Navy comprised 5 Army. battleships/battlecruisers, 2 heavy cruisers, 6 light cruisers, 22 To implement this strategy, a number of surface warships destroyers, 10 torpedo boats, 57 submarines and a few score and disguised raiders were deployed to prearranged locations and mine warfare and support craft.
Recommended publications
  • The Royal New Zealand Navy, 1910-2010 Michael Wynd
    Small Steps from Empire to Independence: The Royal New Zealand Navy, 1910-2010 Michael Wynd Cet article explique le lien intime entre la Marine royale britannique et la la Marine royale néozélandaise dans l’histoire nationale et militaire de la Nouvelle-Zélande, une relation qui a commencé tôt dans l’histoire de la colonie avec l’inclusion de la Nouvelle-Zélande dans le cadre de l’Empire britannique. Jusqu’à dans le courant du vingtième siècle, la Nouvelle-Zélande a maintenu des liens étroits avec la Marine britannique et a embrassé avec enthousiasme son rôle de soutien de l’empire, comme peuvent en témoigner les contributions nationales aux deux guerres mondiales. Pour commencer, l’auteur passera en revue les contributions et le développement d’une marine très distinctement néozélandaise. La dernière partie de l’article examine le développement d’après-guerre de la Marine néozélandaise et les principaux changements qu’elle a subis pour devenir la force qu’elle est en 2010. The history of the Royal New Zealand Navy is a progression of small steps from Empire to independence. The navy in New Zealand has followed a very different path when compared to the experience of Australia and Canada. This paper will explore the influence of such factors as the nation’s manpower and financial capacity to build a fleet, perception of New Zealand’s place within the Empire, a growing self-awareness post- 1945, domestic and party factional politics in the 1970s and 1980s, and finally a shift back to multilateralism and cooperation in the past two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS-KENT-Web-Quality-V2.Pdf
    HMS KENT AND HER PART IN THE BATTLE OF THE FALKLAND ISLANDS 8th December 1914 HMS KENT AND HER PART IN THE BATTLE OF THE FALKLAND ISLANDS 8th December 1914 Adrian Beaumont Visitor Assistant and Guide Canterbury Cathedral Archives Written and researched for the Canterbury Cathedral Archives 2013 This document was made for private educational use to add to the knowledge of the monument in Canterbury Cathedral and to respect those who fought and died in the 1914 naval battle of the Falklands. It is not for general publication or distribution. It should be noted therefore that the contents within are from various sources written by Adrian Beaumont with additional material from original sources. Whilst every effort has been to credit, or use out of copyright material. There may be instances where some of the material, whilst on display at various sites and museums, is not out of copyright. Therefore please treat the material within with the good faith that we have tried to respect. Images on pp 19, 20, 21 and 28 copyright the Imperial War Museum Written by Adrian Beaumont 2013 © Set in Melior Designed by Albert Barber INTRODUCTION This document seeks to describe the Battle of the Falkland Islands and the role paid by HMS Kent, but we should also remember that those killed in the battle are not the only men of HMS Kent who died – both in war or in times of peace. We should remember those who died of natural causes; one example being Henry Reginald MANLEY who was born at Bere Ferris, Devon on 23 November 1889.
    [Show full text]
  • Comfort and Joy'
    ‘Tidings of COMFORT AND JOy’ December 1939 in Britain was a time when there was a noticeable absence of Christmas spirit. War with Germany appeared to have reached stalemate. News of the ‘Graf Spee victory’, better known as ‘The Battle of the River Plate’, provided much needed seasonal cheer. he early months of World War Two were sometimes referred despatched from Wilhelmshaven two weeks before the outbreak of war to as ‘the phoney war’. In some quarters it seemed as if the on the first day of September. Royal Navy was the only service doing any fighting. But the As well as her heavy armament, the capabilities of this ship were war at sea was for real and in earnest. “It was never ‘phoney’ formidable. Her diesel engines gave a range of 10,000 miles for cruising Tfor us”, commented Lord Louis Mountbatten, commander of an at 15 knots, and enabled her to attain her maximum speed of 28 knots operational flotilla of destroyers. “It was the most strenuous winter I’ve faster than steam turbine ships. She was fitted with an early form of ever known, and the most uncomfortable”. He might have added “and radar which had only a range of 19 miles but was a great improvement the most dangerous”. This was tragically illustrated when the battleship, on any form of radar which had not yet been fitted in British ships. She HMS Royal Oak, 31,000 tons, was sunk by torpedoes fired from a had a special wireless device which continually combed the air for all German submarine with the loss of over eight hundred lives when at wireless communications and indicated their occurrence; special cypher anchor in Scapa Flow in the Orkneys on 14 October.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Battle of the River Plate. 13 December 1939 Memorial
    The Battle of the River Plate. 13 December 1939 Memorial dedicated 12 April 2014 The 75th Anniversary Year Frequently-asked questions. These notes written by Henry, Stephen (sons of Admiral Henry Harwood) and Jonathan Harwood (grandson) and Malcolm Collis Archivist of the HMS Ajax & River Plate Veterans Association primarily for the guides at the National Memorial Arboretum and HMS Ajax Website and for those who wish to have ready access to the important facts. Contents 1 Battle description 2 75th Anniversary events, 2014 3 Frequently-asked questions FAQs A. Background. 1 What were Captain Langsdorff’s orders? 2 What were Commodore Harwood’s orders? 3 Why did Graf Spee head for the area off the River Plate? 4 Why did Commodore Harwood concentrate his force off the River Plate? 5 Why did Captain Langsdorff choose to attack the British warships? 6 What were the relative strengths of the two forces? 7 How did Harwood dispose his ships, and why? 8 Why did Graf Spee not use its superior gun range to destroy the British cruisers? 9 What logistic support did the two sides have? FAQs B. The Battle. 10 Why did the British not fly air-reconnaissance on the morning of the 13th December? 11 What part did Graf Spee’s radar play in the battle? 12 Why did Graf Spee not finish off Exeter? 13 Why didn’t Graf Spee sink all three ships? 14 Damage - overview 15 Damage to Graf Spee. 16 Damage to HMS Exeter 17 Damage to HMS Ajax 18 Damage to HMS Achilles. 19 Why didn’t Graf Spee divide the fire from its two 11 inch guns and engage Exeter with one and Ajax/Achilles with the other? 20 Ships’ capabilities remaining after the action.
    [Show full text]
  • Ajax New Past up For
    NEWSLETTER SEPTEMBER 2018 CONTENTS Chairman's Report Standard Bearer Report South America Trip 2019 Update Ajax Street Update Should've gone to … Alf Larkin's House Move Membership Secretary's Report HMS Ganges Redevelopment Exeter Model The Banana Boat The Captain Tubby Squires Award 2017/18 Henry Harwood Hero of the River Plate The Debbie Steer Tour The Fate of HMS' Achilles Archivist Report Newsletter Editor's Comments 1935 - 48 1963 - 85 Nec Quisquam Nisi Ajax www.hmsajax.org 2. 3. CHAIRMAN Then it was time for the preliminary Nigel Masters bouts up to and including the semi- The Lookout finals. I watched my team mates step in Golden Cross Terrace the ring and win their bouts; P.T.I. Tug Station Road, Swineshead Wilson, Nobby Hall, Scouse Murray, Boston, Lincolnshire PE20 3LP Tel: 01205 820127 Terry Webster, Whisky Walker, Bruno Mobile: 07743 381153 Bowen and then it was my turn! I was to [email protected] fight a trainee from HMS Cambridge who when I stepped in the ring looked even more terrified than me! The bell SECRETARY Peter Danks rang and I went forwards and he went 104 Kelsey Avenue www.hmsajax.org backwards into his corner and there he Southbourne, Emsworth [email protected] stayed; the referee stopped the bout. I Hampshire PO10 8NQ thought this boxing lark is easy; little Tel: 01243 371947 did I know what lay ahead! [email protected] T h e n c a m e m y n e m e s i s , m y CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Armageddon, my destiny; his name was MEMBERSHIP Hello to you all.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Service Story of Commander John Berridge RNZN
    © Royal Navy Instructor Officers’ Association, 2020 - all rights reserved Service Story of Commander John Berridge RNZN This is my contribution as a Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) Instructor Officer from 1970 to 1990 and is about the Instructor Officer branch of the RNZN as well as my own recollections of my time in the Service. I also have a strong affinity to the Royal Navy (RN) as my late father was a Chief Electrical Artificer (CEA) in the RN from 1928 to 1950 serving in HM Ships Ramillies, Achilles, Renown, Cleopatra, Manxman and Cossack; of great significance is the fact that his last posting was to the RNZN on loan. He then spent 20 more years in the Devonport (Auckland) Naval Dockyard as a fire control technician. He met my mother in 1936 in Auckland while serving in HMS Achilles; she travelled to the UK in 1941, where they married and she then worked for the NZ Government in London for the rest of the war years. The cruiser HMS Achilles was launched in 1932 before being transferred to the New Zealand Division of the Royal Navy in 1936. Following the formal establishment of the Royal New Zealand Navy in October 1941, the ship became HMNZS Achilles. HMS Achilles alongside Aotea Quay, Wellington, during the late 1930s Source: Photograph by Sydney Charles Smith (New Zealand Government History website) In July 1948 HMNZS Achilles was transferred to the Indian Navy and became the INS Delhi. The ship attended the 1953 Coronation Review and also played itself in the David Lean film “Battle of the River Plate” before it was eventually decommissioned and scrapped in 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepys England Expects Card Game
    PEPYS ENGLAND EXPECTS CARD GAME This is the famous signal made from Nelson’s flagship, HMS Victory, just before the Battle of Trafalgar on 21st October 1805. The Admiral instructed his Signals Officer to urgently signal to the fleet “England confides that every man will do his duty”. The officer, Lieutenant John Pasco, asked Nelson if he could substitute “expects” for “confides” as this would shorten the time to send the signal because there was a three flag combination for “expects” but not for “confides” which would have to be spelled out with an eight flag sequence of letters rather than the one signal from the naval vocabulary for “expects”. The signalling system with flags had recently been improved and standardised by Captain Home Popham for the Royal Navy and was based upon 10 numeric flags and combinations of those to represent commonly used terms and manoeuvres. For example “England” was represented by flags 2- 5-3. The flags were hoisted on a succession of the signalling ship’s masts so most signals were kept short in order that the whole message could be displayed at once. The spirit of the English success at the Battle of Trafalgar was evoked for this wartime Pepys card game which was published in 1940. The famous Nelson’s Column in Trafalgar Square in London, which is pictured on the card backs, was erected to commemorate the Battle of Trafalgar and Nelson’s death and was finished in 1843. The column is just over 169 feet tall and cost £47,000 to build. The Landseer lions were not added until 1867.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Ensign Magazine Issue 9, Summer 2010
    COMMEMORATIVE ISSUE: THE BAttLE OF THE RIVER PLATE ISSUE 09 SUMMER 2010 www.navymuseum.mil.nz COLUMN HEAD GUEST EDITORIAL FRONT COVER: MDD The front cover is taken 0028 from a postcard designed by cartoonist “Inky” McNicol, a member of the ship’s company at the River Plate 1939. FORTITER IN RE - ACHILLES MOTO contents (Firmness in Action). ISSUE 09 SUMMER 2010 BACK COVER: WW2 Navy Week Loans 04 Prelude to Battle: Poster. Peter Corbett BACKGROUND IMAGE: 10 Death of a Panzerschiffe: Lapel badge given to Richard Jackson ship’s company. c1936 16 Radar at the River Plate: Ian Walker 20 Admiral Sir Edward Parry: David Ledson 24 A Civilian Remembers: Peter Ross 26 The Home Coming: Terry Manson 28 Lieutenant Richard Washbourn: David Ledson 31 New Zealand Ensign Flies: Oral History GUEST EDITORIAL 32 Lincoln Martinson: Kelly Ana Morey am extremely pleased to be writing this guest editorial for The forget. Our Captain, Bill Parry, was also injured when that shell of them remarked “Isn’t it a pity that our countries are at war”. White Ensign. Seventy years ago I couldn’t have known that I exploded—he was a man among men. Some time after the battle ACHILLES visited Buenos Aries, across 34 Harry Beesley: I would survive the Battle of the River Plate, or the whole war, and There are no atheists on board a ship in action. When the battle the Plate estuary in Argentina. Going ashore, we heard some great Kelly Ana Morey be able to write of it in my 94th year. My recollections of the Battle of was over I looked up and crossed myself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of the River Plate: Excerpts from the Diary of Surgeon Commander Jack Cussen RN, PMO of HMS EXETER S G Bennett
    History 53 The Battle of the River Plate: excerpts from the diary of Surgeon Commander Jack Cussen RN, PMO of HMS EXETER S G Bennett Commentary guns of EXETER and the 6-inch guns of the Leanders. Harwood divided the squadron in two in order to split the German fire.3 HMS EXETER, the second of two York Class heavy cruisers, was launched in 1929. She had a displacement of 8,400 tons, At 0618 hours GRAF SPEE opened fire. EXETER returned a complement of 628 and main armament of three twin 8-inch fire at 0620. Over the course of the next half hour, EXETER guns in addition to AA guns and torpedoes. sustained very extensive damage from GRAF SPEE’s heavier guns. Both A and B turrets were hit and put out of action, At the outbreak of World War Two, EXETER was heading their gun crews being killed or wounded. One blast largely back to South American waters. She had spent most of the destroyed the bridge, leaving only three survivors including three previous years in the South Atlantic, the Caribbean and Captain Bell, who repaired to the after conning position in the Pacific “showing the flag.” After this long commission order to continue to fight the ship. There, communications had away from home, she returned to Devonport in August 1939, largely been destroyed and orders had to be conveyed by a only to set sail again for the South Atlantic after four days chain of messengers. Damage to the hull led to considerable alongside, just enough time for any reliefs to join.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Ensign Is the Official Navy Museum Journal
    ISSUE 04 AUTUMN 2008 www.navymuseum.mil.nz Te Waka Taonga o Te Taua Moana o Aotearoa The White Ensign is the official Navy Museum Journal. At present it is published three times a year. DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE Views expressed in The White Ensign are not necessarily those of the RNZN. All photographs are ON THE COVER: from the Navy Museum unless stated otherwise. Alex Cameron (left) and Charles 2008 is the 100th anniversary of the arrival of ‘The Great White Fleet’ Claxton, both from Christchurch, do the CONTRIBUTIONS, DITS, FEEDBACK AND ENQUIRIES: to New Zealand waters. The sight of sixteen capital ships of the United traditional Trafalgar Square photo shoot on their way to crewing the new HMNZS Contributions and feedback are welcomed. States Navy in Auckland harbour must have been overwhelmingly Reprinting of items are encouraged if the Navy Otago in 1960. impressive, reflected in the fact that upwards of 10 percent of New Museum is acknowledged. All copy and enquiries to be directed to the Managing Editor. Zealand’s population at the time viewed the Fleet. In this issue we look at this event from a New Zealand perspective and consider how the visit WHITE ENSIGN EDITORIAL ADVISORS: perhaps represented the beginnings of closer military ties with the United contents ISSUE 04 AUTUMN 2008 CDR David Wright States of America. Mr Cliff Heywood In this issue we also commemorate the 90th anniversary of New LT CDR Barbara Cassin Director’s Message Zealand’s participation in the greatest operation of World War One where 02 MANAGING EDITOR: motor launches were involved - the raids on Zeebrugge and Ostend on Feature Rose Evans St George’s Day, April 23rd 1918.
    [Show full text]