The Olde Town of Segovia and Its Aqueduct: Preservation and Tourist Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 7-2006 The Olde Town of Segovia and Its Aqueduct: Preservation and Tourist Management Rose Ann Switt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Switt, Rose Ann, "The Olde Town of Segovia and Its Aqueduct: Preservation and Tourist Management" (2006). Master's Theses. 3865. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3865 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE OLDE TOWN OF SEGOVIA AND ITS AQUEDUCT: PRESERVATION AND TOURISTMANAGEMENT by Rose Ann Switt A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan July 2006 Copyrightby Rose Ann Switt 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The doors of opportunity in the discipline of geography have been unlocked forme, thanks to the dedication and inspiration of one man, Dr. Ronald Janke. His enthusiasm for his fieldof study and his willingness to extend a guiding hand has had such a positive influenceon my life. I look forwardto continuing to open the doors he so graciously led me to. Walking beside Dr. Janke is my advisor, Dr. Gregory Veeck, whose encouragement and "push through the door" enabled me to reach formy research goal to work abroad. His countless hours of mentoring and "pouring over" my papers have foreverstrengthened the foundationof my education. To the WesternMichigan University (WMU) Graduate School and the WMU Department of Geography's Harrison Fund I extend my appreciation forsupporting me financially in my endeavors on this research project. University backing to apply the fundamentalstaught within the university's walls has been outstanding. Continuing in the practice of sharing their expertise of their work with students, I wantto thank Dr. James Biles and Dr. Deborah Che, two of my committee members, fortheir patience, suggestions, and meaningfulsupport throughout my two years of research. Your commitment as professionalsis valued. Exploring the differentdisciplines housed within a university can be challenging. I want to thank Dr. Nora Faires of WMU's Department of History for inviting me to join her class on the studies of immigration. Her presentations and 11 course structure provided me with the opportunity to expand my skills as a writer and researcher. To my fellow graduate students, especially Melissa Kovach and Zachary Newton, and other faculty members I want to thank you forthe countless hours of meaningful supportand help you have provided throughout my research and writings. The friendshipsformed within these two years will carry forward in my life's endeavors. I owe a debt of gratitude to my friendsin Segovia, Spain. Dr. Glenn Murray, technical director of the Mint Foundation of Segovia, took me under his wing and shared his expertise with me. Teresa Hemanz, interpreter as well as dear friend, spent for countless days guiding me through the streets of the old city, introducing me to the shop keepers and the local culture. A special thank you to all the others who helped made my stay in their beautiful city so memorable. Most importantly, I want to thank my children, Jason, Christopher, and April for their emotional support they have extended throughout my stay here at WMU. It is through their encouragement and example that I have been able to move forward crossing over the stepping stones to reach my educational goals. Thank you!!! Rose Ann Switt 111 THE OLDE TOWN OF SEGOVIA AND ITS AQUEDUCT: PRESERVATION AND TOURIST MANAGEMENT Rose Ann Switt, M.A. Western Michigan University, 2006 The city of Segovia, Spain is known for its Acueducto (Aqueduct), the Alcazar Castle, its Catedral (Cathedral), la Casa de la Moneda de Segovia (the House of Money of Segovia), and over 60 additional historical buildings, monuments, and protected vistas. This abundance qualifiedthe city for designation in 1986 as a World Heritage site under guidelines established by the United Nations Education and Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). World Heritage Site status is coveted by city and regions around the world, but little research conducted in Spain has been recorded in English to determine if receiving this status actually affects historic preservation and tourism activities. This research documents changes in Segovia that have occurred since this status was awarded. The project employs a comparative method incorporating several approaches: 1) new photographs of buildings, monuments, and views are compared to the 100 year old pictures taken by photographer Alois Beer to identify landscape change, 2) specific renovation projects are evaluated from a variety of perspectives including: interviews with key personel, a survey of local mercants and service providers, and 3) archival materials from a number of libraries and repositories in Segovia are used to place the interviews and survey results in appropriate context. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .....................................................................ii LIST OF TABLES...................................................................... ........ vii LIST OF FIGURES............................................ : ............................... viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION......................... .............................................1 UNESCO, World Heritage, and The Convention................ ..........! Problem Statement........................................... ................... 3 Research Objectives................................................ ............ 4 II LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................. 7 III METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES..................................... ....12 Method I-A Comparison of Historical and Contemporary Photographs............................................... .. 12 Method II- Surveys......................................................... 14 Method III - Interviews ...................................................... 15 Method IV - Segovian City Archival Materials............... ........... 16 IV CONTEXT AND RESULTS............................................. ............ 17 A Brief Introduction to Segovia, Spain.................................... 17 The Tourist......................................................... ............ 22 Tourist Management Plan and Policies.................................... 24 Cultural Tradition................................................. ............31 Public versus Private Agendas........................................ ......32 IV Table of Contents--continued CHAPTER Comparison of Historical and Contemporary Photographs .............39 Plaza de Colmenares y de la Torre de la Iglesia de San Juan de los Caballeros (Figures 14 and 15) ............... .41 Vistadef Acueducto(Figures 16 and 17) ........................ .43 San Millan y la Sierra de Guadarrama (Figures 18 and 19) ..................................................44 Fachada de/ Palacio de Valdeaguila (Figures 20 and 21) ..................................................45 La Puerta de San Andres (Figures 22 and 23).................. .46 Vistade San Marcos (Figures 24 and 25) ........................47 The Results of the Survey................................................... 55 The Results of the Interviews................................... ............ 60 V CONCLUSION AND FURTHER RESEARCH AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................... 63 Conclusion ..................................................................... 63 Further Research and Recommendations ................................. 64 APPENDICES A. World Heritage Selection Criteria ................................................... 66 B. Europe World Heritage List ......................................................... 69 C. HSIRB Letter of Project Approval and Endorsed Consent Forms .............................................................82 D. 2005 HSIRB Approved Survey Form ............................................... 90 E. 2005 HSIRB Protocol Outline For Interview Questions .........................95 V Table of Contents-continued APPENDICES F. TICCIH 2004 Confirmation Letter ................................................ 105 G. Original ICOMOS Petition for World Heritage Status ..........................107 H. Revised ICOMOS Petition for World Heritage Status ......................... .113 I. Format forthe Periodic Reporting on the Application of the World Heritage Convention .................................. 116 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................... ......................126 VI LIST OF TABLES 1. 2006 Ranking of World Heritage European Countries............................. 5 2. Festivals of Segovia ...................................................................23 3. Controversial Projects in Segovia................... ; ...............................3 3 Vll LIST OF FIGURES 1. Map of Spain/Europe .................................................................................................. 6 2. Segovia, Spain ..........................................................................................................