DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissertation Chapters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissertation Chapters UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Getting it Right or Playing it Safe? Confusion, the Status Quo Bias and Correct Voting in Direct Democracy A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Michael M. Binder Committee in charge: Professor Thaddeus Kousser, Chair Professor Shaun Bowler Professor Amy Bridges Professor Theodore Groves Professor Zoltan Hajnal Professor Gary Jacobson Professor Stephen Nicholson 2010 The Dissertation of Michael M. Binder is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm. __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my mom, Terry Binder. Even though she’s not here to read these pages, not a word could have been written without her in my life. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page………………………………………………………………...………iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………....……..iv Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………v List of Figures………………………………………………………………………....vi List of Tables……………………………………………………..………………….viii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………ix Vita………………………………………………………………………………..…xiii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………...….xiv Chapter 1: Theories of Voting in Direct Democracy…………………………………..1 Chapter 2: Political Context and Issue Difficulty…………………………………….18 Chapter 3: Confusion in the Electorate……………………………………………….46 Chapter 4: I Don’t “No”? Confusion and the Status Quo Bias in Direct Democracy..77 Chapter 5: Getting it Right? Correct Voting in Direct Democracy…………………105 References…………………………………………………………………………...132 v LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 3 Figure 3.1: Percentage of Confused Voters………………………………………..…56 Figure 3.2: Confusion by Operationalization of the Measure………………………...57 Figure 3.3: Confusion by Issue Difficulty…………………………………………....59 Figure 3.4: Aggregate Confusion Measures by Issue Difficulty……………………..62 Figure 3.5: Confusion by Education……………………………………………….…64 Figure 3.6: Confusion by Political Interest………………………………………...…65 Figure 3.7: Confusion by General Political Knowledge………………….…………..67 Figure 3.8: Confusion by Initiative Specific Information……………………….……69 Figure 3.9: Confusion by Cue Awareness……………………………………………71 Chapter 4 Figure 4.1: Ballot Length and “No” Votes……………………………………...…....85 Figure 4.2: Ballot Summary Length and “No” Votes………………………………...86 Figure 4.3: Title Length and “No” Votes…………………………………………..…87 Figure 4.4: Individual Level Measure of Confusion and “No” Votes…………….….88 Figure 4.5: Individual Differences between Not Confused and Confused Voters and “No” Votes…………………………………………………………….….90 Chapter 5 Figure 5.1: Correct Voting on Initiatives……………………………………………117 vi Figure 5.2: Percentage of Correct Votes by Confusion Levels……………………...120 Figure 5.3: Percentage of Confused by Issue Difficulty…………………………….121 Figure 5.4: Correct Votes by Confusion…………………………………………….122 Figure 5.5: Percentage of Sample Aware of Cue……………………………………124 Figure 5.6: Electorate with and without Confusion…………………………………129 vii LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 Table 2.1: Issue Difficulty…………………………………………………………... 45 Chapter 3 Table 3.1: Bivariate Correlation Matrix of Confusion Measures………………….…61 Table 3.2: Determinants of Confusion……………………………….……………….73 Chapter 4 Table 4.1: Confusion and “No” Votes in Sample…………….………………………84 Table 4.2: Determinants of Vote Choice…………………………………………..…98 Chapter 5 Table 5.1 Effect of Confusion and Selected Predictors on Voting Correctly……….127 viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The hours that turned into days, months and eventually years over which I worked on this dissertation could not have been sustained without a lot of help along the way. I have been blessed to be surrounded by remarkable scholars, but more importantly, tremendous human beings. The list of acknowledgements is long and varied, but everyone was indispensible to the completion of this dissertation. The Political Science Department at the University of California, San Diego has taught me invaluable lessons and given me a framework from which to view the world of social science, my thanks to go out to the faculty. Additionally, I owe thanks for the financial and professional support from UCSD and the California State University system that allowed me to travel to conferences and summer programs, without which my research could not have been completed. I would also like to thank the attendees and discussants at those conferences that provided me with valuable feedback. I would also like to the Bill Center for the American West at Stanford University for their generous fellowship support. The core data for my analysis comes from a series of exit polls that enlisted the interviewing skills of hundreds of undergraduate volunteers from UCSD and San Diego State University. Though they received extra credit for their efforts, I am indebted to my students for their hard work and hours spent in the sun and (believe it or not) rain in San Diego. They went above and beyond the call—thank you all. Professionally and personally, I owe a debt of gratitude that can never be repaid to the chair of my dissertation, Thad Kousser. Aside from the example he sets ix as a stellar member of the political science community, his tireless devotion to his family and continuous smile are enough to keep even a jaded east coaster like myself motivated. Thad has invested countless hours of his personal time reading my drafts and clarifying my often cloudy ideas. When I was slacking on my research, he brought me to Stanford with him so I could finish my research without the distraction of being a teaching assistant at UCSD or teaching classes at SDSU. My dissertation may never have been written without his guidance. While getting my MA from SDSU, my thesis advisor Richard Hofstetter, introduced me to what social science is, and more importantly, how it ought to be conducted. My time at SDSU, particularly the Sunday afternoons at Richard’s apartment with my colleagues taught me the value of unselfish collaboration in the pursuit of knowledge. I must also thank Julie Sullivan for scooping me up and throwing me into her Freshman Success program. She infected me with the bug for standing in front of a room full of college students. More importantly, she was patient enough to show me what a real teacher is. Those morning coffees at Rich Ledet’s house, kept our brains alive throughout our theses and that year before we started in our Ph. D. programs. Before I was even admitted to UCSD, I took Amy Bridges’ American Political Development course. Admittedly, I generally have pretty decent luck, but the good fortune I had to have this class takes the cake. I was able to sit with her and one other grad student for three hours every Friday at 9:00 AM and talk about some of the most interesting political history books written. Those three hours introduced to me to life x in a Ph. D. program, and Amy has not stopped mentoring since. Amy’s sage advice is always right on the money, whether it was a suggestion of a class to take, a course to avoid or how to look at a situation through the eyes of another. Thank you for all the lunch time chats, if I can become half the scholar and person you are, I will consider my career and life a success. The rest of my committee (Gary Jacobson, Zoli Hajnal, Stephen Nicholson, Shaun Bowler and Teddy Groves) haven given me invaluable feedback and I thank them for reading this dissertation so closely and thoughtfully. The political science department at Stanford (particularly Gary Segura and Simon Jackman) gave me the opportunity to present a practice job talk at their weekly seminar which provided me with a great deal of feedback and ideas, both substantively and in my presentation. I would also like to thank Tammy Frisby and Vlad Kogan (my officemate in Palo Alto) for their thoughtful comments after sitting through a very rough practice job talk. It is often said that the value in grad school is not determined by the quality of the faculty, but by the quality of your peers. I could not agree more. I was lucky enough to have a cohort that was not only smarter than I am, but kind enough to put up with me. Whether it was a late night game theory study session, an evening of poker or a Poli-Sox game, my peers, my colleagues, my friends, were always there helping me along. Sometimes it was a research design discussion with Jen Keister, sometimes it was chatting about citations and the state of the literature with Matt Childers; however, it was the time spent blowing off steam that got me through grad school. I will never forget watching Danielle Jung turnover a royal flush to beat Oldman’s full xi house, standing on second base waiting for Sam Seljan to hit me in or all of us racing to scoop up balls as Ellen Moule dodged for her life. I cannot thank you all enough; you have shaped not only my research but who I am as a person. I have three very special people that make life worth living and research worth doing. First, my new bride Lara, she has been along for what was a very tumultuous academic ride. She was there when “good start” led to an incident with a phonebook and a fence,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2004 Venezuelan Presidential Recall Referendum
    Statistical Science 2011, Vol. 26, No. 4, 517–527 DOI: 10.1214/09-STS295 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2011 The 2004 Venezuelan Presidential Recall Referendum: Discrepancies Between Two Exit Polls and Official Results Raquel Prado and Bruno Sans´o Abstract. We present a simulation-based study in which the results of two major exit polls conducted during the recall referendum that took place in Venezuela on August 15, 2004, are compared to the of- ficial results of the Venezuelan National Electoral Council “Consejo Nacional Electoral” (CNE). The two exit polls considered here were conducted independently by S´umate, a nongovernmental organization, and Primero Justicia, a political party. We find significant discrepan- cies between the exit poll data and the official CNE results in about 60% of the voting centers that were sampled in these polls. We show that discrepancies between exit polls and official results are not due to a biased selection of the voting centers or to problems related to the size of the samples taken at each center. We found discrepancies in all the states where the polls were conducted. We do not have enough information on the exit poll data to determine whether the observed discrepancies are the consequence of systematic biases in the selection of the people interviewed by the pollsters around the country. Neither do we have information to study the possibility of a high number of false or nonrespondents. We have limited data suggesting that the dis- crepancies are not due to a drastic change in the voting patterns that occurred after the exit polls were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Would You Let This Man Drive Your Daughter Home? Public Sector Focus, August/September, August 30Th, Pp.14-17
    Dorling, D. (2019) Would you let this man drive your daughter home? Public Sector Focus, August/September, August 30th, pp.14-17. https://flickread.com/edition/html/index.php?pdf=5d67acffb3d60#17 Would you let this man drive your daughter home? Danny Dorling In the early hours of July 19th 1969, a few days before the first man stepped on the moon; a car swerved on a bridge in Chappaquiddick, Massachusetts. Ted Kennedy, the 37-year-old younger brother of the President of the United States of America was at the wheel. The car plunged into the water. Ted managed to swim free. He left Mary Jo Kopechne, his 28-year- old passenger to die in the vehicle. At some point, as it slowly submerged, she drowned. Ted notified the police of the accident ten hours later. Another man had recovered the vehicle and found Jo’s body. Jo was very pretty, a secretary, a typist, a loyal political activist and a dedicated Democrat. She died just over a week before her 29th birthday. It was at first seen as a joke when Lord Ashcroft asked the question ‘Would you rather allow Jeremey Hunt or Boris Johnson to babysit your children’.1 The Daily Telegraph newspaper reported that ‘in a curious little snippet from the weekend. According to a poll by Lord Ashcroft, only 10 per cent of voters would let Boris Johnson babysit their children.’2 However, it was more than curious, some 52% of all voters said they would not allow either of the two candidates vying for the leadership of the Conservative party such access to their children.
    [Show full text]
  • Exit Poll 25Th May, 2018
    Thirty-sixth Amendment to the Constitution Exit Poll 25th May, 2018 RTÉ & Behaviour & Attitudes Exit Poll Prepared by Ian McShane, Behaviour & Attitudes J.9097 Technical Appendix Sample Size Fieldwork Location The sample was spread Interviews were conducted throughout all forty Dáil face-to-face with randomly The results of this opinion constituencies and undertaken selected individuals – poll are based upon a at 175 polling stations. representative sample of throughout the hours of 3779 eligible Irish voters polling from 7am to 10pm in aged 18 years +. accordance with the 1992 Electoral Act. 2 Technical Appendix Informational Reporting Accuracy Coverage Guidelines Extracts from the report may The margin of error is Three questionnaire versions be quoted or published on estimated to be plus or minus were fielded. Each version condition that due 1.6 percentage points on the included five common acknowledgement is given to five common questions and questions, along with six to RTÉ and Behaviour & plus or minus 2.8 percentage eight questions unique to Attitudes. points on the questions that particular version. unique to each of the three questionnaire versions. 3 Research Methodology ● A face-to-face Exit Poll was conducted among voters immediately after leaving polling stations on Referendum Day, 25th May, 2018. ● An effective sample of 3779 voters was interviewed. ● The Poll was undertaken in all forty Dáil constituencies. ● 175 polling stations were sampled, distributed proportionate to the Referendum Electorate in each constituency. ● A list of the electoral divisions at which surveying was conducted is included in Appendix A. ● The questionnaires used are included in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • OPINION and Exit Polls Remained at the Centre Of
    Published in: Seminar. 539; July 2004; 73-77 Understanding polls and predictions OPINION and exit polls remained at the centre of media attention both during the 2004 election and after, though for different reasons and with a difference in our attitude towards them. The media attention on polls was heightened by the attempt initiated by the Election Commission to ban opinion polls and exit polls. It witnessed on the one hand a unanimous agreement among various political parties in favour of the ban and, on the other, a near unanimous expression of disapproval of the ban from the media houses. The Supreme Court’s refusal to ban the exit poll in the recently concluded elections notwithstanding, many have suggested that media must exercise restraint in publishing them during the election process. However, both the visual and print media in the country was vying with each other to inform the public with the latest status of each political party with respect to the seats they would eventually win. It was precisely for these predictions that the pollsters were once again in the spotlight, though this time as the underdogs. In the above context it may be worthwhile to critically examine the implications of opinion and exit polls for democracy. Though there was some debate on this in the media itself but sadly most arguments seem to centre around the primacy of ‘evidence’ and ‘facts’ in support of either the camps that condemn the purported ban or welcome such a ban, reflecting a ‘positivist’ prejudice that worships ‘facts’ as a ‘holy cow’.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnamese Glossary of Election Terms.Pdf
    U.S. ELECTION AssISTANCE COMMIssION ỦY BAN TRợ GIÚP TUYểN Cử HOA Kỳ 2008 GLOSSARY OF KEY ELECTION TERMINOLOGY Vietnamese BảN CHÚ GIảI CÁC THUậT Ngữ CHÍNH Về TUYểN Cử Tiếng Việt U.S. ELECTION AssISTANCE COMMIssION ỦY BAN TRợ GIÚP TUYểN Cử HOA Kỳ 2008 GLOSSARY OF KEY ELECTION TERMINOLOGY Vietnamese Bản CHÚ GIải CÁC THUậT Ngữ CHÍNH về Tuyển Cử Tiếng Việt Published 2008 U.S. Election Assistance Commission 1225 New York Avenue, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Glossary of key election terminology / Bản CHÚ GIải CÁC THUậT Ngữ CHÍNH về TUyển Cử Contents Background.............................................................1 Process.................................................................2 How to use this glossary ..................................................3 Pronunciation Guide for Key Terms ........................................3 Comments..............................................................4 About EAC .............................................................4 English to Vietnamese ....................................................9 Vietnamese to English ...................................................82 Contents Bối Cảnh ...............................................................5 Quá Trình ..............................................................6 Cách Dùng Cẩm Nang Giải Thuật Ngữ Này...................................7 Các Lời Bình Luận .......................................................7 Về Eac .................................................................7 Tiếng Anh – Tiếng Việt ...................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Opinion Polls
    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Status of Opinion Polls Media Gimmick and Political Communication in India PRAVEEN RAI Vol. 49, Issue No. 16, 19 Apr, 2014 Praveen Rai ([email protected]) is a political analyst at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi. Election surveys are seen as covert instruments used by political parties for making seat predictions and influencing the electorate in India. It is high time opinion polls take cognizance of the situation to establish their credibility and impartiality. The very mention of the word opinion Poll[i]” immediately brings to the mind of people in India election surveys, exit polls[ii] and seat predictions that appear in mass media every time an election takes place in the country. Psephology, the study of elections, began as an academic exercise at the Centre for the Study of Developing Studies (CSDS), Delhi in the 1960s for the purpose of studying the voting behaviour and attitudes of the voters. Psephology is now equated with pre poll surveys and exit polls which are being rampantly done by media houses to predict the winners during the elections. It has now been reduced to a media gimmick with allegations that it is used as communication tool for influencing the voters by a conglomerate of political parties, media and business houses with vested interests. Media houses and television anchors in India have become the modern day “Nostradamus” in using opinion poll findings in forecasting election results, before the actual votes are cast, which have gone wrong on many occasions. Accuracy of sample surveys depend on the following factors: one, the sample should be large enough to yield the desired level of precision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exit Poll Phenomenon
    Chapter 1 The Exit Poll Phenomenon n election day in the United States, exit polls are the talk of the nation. Even before ballot- O ing has concluded, the media uses voters’ responses about their electoral choices to project final results for a public eager for immediate information. Once votes have been tallied, media commentators from across the political landscape rely almost exclusively on exit polls to explain election outcomes. The exit polls show what issues were the most important in the minds of the voters. They identify how different groups in the electorate cast their ballots. They expose which character traits helped or hurt particular candidates. They even reveal voters’ expectations of the government moving forward. In the weeks and months that follow, exit polls are used time and again to give meaning to the election results. Newly elected officials rely on them to substantiate policy mandates they claim to have received from voters. Partisan pundits scrutinize them for successful and failed campaign strategies. Even political strategists use them to pinpoint key groups and issues that need to be won over to succeed in future elections. Unfortunately, these same exit poll results are not easily accessible to members of the public interested in dissecting them. After appearing in the next day’s newspapers or on a politically ori- ented website, they disappear quickly from sight as the election fades in prominence. Eventually, the exit polls are archived at universities where only subscribers are capable of retrieving the data. But nowhere is a complete set of biennial exit poll results available in an easy-to-use format for curious parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Exit Polls Showed Him Ahead in Nearly Every Battleground State, in Many Cases by Sizable Margins
    The Center for Organizational Dynamics operates within the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Arts and Sciences, Graduate Division, conducting research and scholarship relevant to organizations, public affairs, and policy. Copyrights remain with the authors and/or their publishers. Reproduction, posting to web pages, electronic bulletin boards or other electronic archives is prohibited without consent of the copyright holders. For additional information, please email [email protected] or call (215) 898-6967 A Research Report from the University of Pennsylvania Graduate Division, School of Arts & Sciences Center for Organizational Dynamics The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy Steven F. Freeman1 [email protected] 2 December 29, 2004 Most Americans who listened to radio or surfed the internet on election day this year sat down to watch the evening television coverage thinking John Kerry won the election. Exit polls showed him ahead in nearly every battleground state, in many cases by sizable margins. Although pre- election day polls indicated the race dead even or Bush slightly ahead, two factors seemed to explain Kerry’s edge: turnout was very high, good news for Democrats,3 and, as in every US 1 I would like to thank Jonathan Baron, Bernard B. Beard, Michael Bein, Mark Blumenthal, James Brown, Elaine Calabrese, Becky Collins, Gregory Eck, Jeremy Firestone, Lilian Friedberg, Robert Giambatista, Kurt Gloos, Gwen Hughes, Clyde Hull, Carolyn Julye, John Kessel, Mark Kind, Joe Libertelli, Warren Mitofsky, Michael Morrissey, John Morrison, Barry Negrin, Elinor Pape, David Parks, Kaja Rebane, Sandra Rothenberg, Cynthia Royce, Joseph Shipman, Jonathon Simon, Daniela Starr, Larry Starr, Barry Stennett, Roy Streit, Leanne Tobias, Andrei Villarroel, Lars Vinx, Ken Warren, Andreas Wuest, Elaine Zanutto, John Zogby, and Dan Zoutis for helpful comments or other help in preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Forensics and the 2004 Venezuelan Presidential Recall Referendum As a Case Study Alicia L
    Statistics Publications Statistics 2011 Election Forensics and the 2004 Venezuelan Presidential Recall Referendum as a Case Study Alicia L. Carriquiry Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_pubs Part of the Statistics and Probability Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ stat_las_pubs/21. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Statistics at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Statistics Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Election Forensics and the 2004 Venezuelan Presidential Recall Referendum as a Case Study Abstract A referendum to recall President Hugo Chávez was held in Venezuela in August of 2004. In the referendum, voters were to vote YES if they wished to recall the President and NO if they wanted him to continue in office. The official results were 59% NO and 41% YES. Even though the election was monitored by various international groups including the Organization of American States and the Carter Center (both of which declared that the referendum had been conducted in a free and transparent manner), the outcome of the election was questioned by other groups both inside and outside of Venezuela. The oc llection of manuscripts that comprise this issue of Statistical Science discusses the general topic of election forensics but also focuses on different statistical approaches to explore, post-election, whether irregularities in the voting, vote transmission or vote counting processes could be detected in the 2004 presidential recall referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Gerrymandering and Republican Gains in Southern House Elections
    Journal of Political Science Volume 23 Number 1 Article 4 November 1995 Racial Gerrymandering and Republican Gains in Southern House Elections Donald Beachler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Beachler, Donald (1995) "Racial Gerrymandering and Republican Gains in Southern House Elections," Journal of Political Science: Vol. 23 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops/vol23/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Politics at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Political Science by an authorized editor of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RACIAL GERRYMANDERING AND REPUBLICAN GAINS IN SOUTHERN HOUSE ELECTIONS Dona!,dBeachler, Ithaca College Introduction During the 1980s, southern House elections were characterized by two important results. 1 First , the Republican party made no net gains in southern House seats over the course of the decade. In the 1980s Democrats dominated congressional and state politics in the South by constructing bi-racial coalitions. Southern Democratic nominees were moderate enough to win white votes which, when combined with overwhelming African-American majorities , produced electoral success in many cases. 2 The failure to gain seats in the South, a region where the GOP had dominated presidential politics in most elections since 1972, 3 was a major reason Republicans failed in their drive to gain a majority in the House of Representatives during the Reagan-Bush years. However, the House elections of 1992 and 1994 proved a boon to southern Republicans as they gained nine southern House seats in the election of 1992 and an additional 16 seats in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Live the Exit Poll
    Long Live the Exit Poll D. James Greiner & Kevin M. Quinn Abstract: We discuss the history of the exit poll as well as its future in an era characterized by increasingly effective and inexpensive alternatives for obtaining information. With respect to the exit poll’s future, we identify and assess four purposes it might serve. We conclude that the exit poll’s most important function in the future should, and probably will, be to provide information about the administration of the fran- chise and about the voter’s experience in casting a ballot. The nature of this purpose suggests that it may make sense for academic institutions to replace media outlets as the primary implementers of exit polls. Is the exit poll intellectually dead? That is, in the foreseeable future, can exit polling serve a purpose other than allowing media operations to “call” elections a few hours earlier than of½cial results become available? This process of calling elec- tions, and the race among media organizations to be the ½rst to do so, may serve a recreational pur- pose; but whether calling elections contributes much to a thriving democracy is uncertain. Even if we consider a set of questions crucial to the social sciences and law about the nature of the electorate, it is still not immediately clear that exit polls have much of a future. Suppose we want to learn about the characteristics and motivations of voters. Are we better off with the exit poll–cur- rently around forty-½ve years old–or with a com- bination of older (mail, telephone) and younger (Internet) forms of polling, which may now be able to provide a great deal of information more cheaply D.
    [Show full text]
  • Exit Polls: Do They Need an Exit?
    EXIT POLLS: DO THEY NEED AN EXIT? Piyush Mishra* AnkurJain* Introduction On 141 September 1999, a Constitutional Bench' of the Supreme Court of India dismissed the writ petition of the Election Commission seeking enforcement of its guidelines banning publication/ telecast/ broadcast of exit and opinion poll results by the media during the period of elections.' Earlier, on 8th September, a Full Bench of the Supreme Court had referred the matter to a Constitutional Bench, as it felt the matter involved substantial questions of constitutional importance, including the freedom of speech and expression.! Also, another Full Bench of the Supreme Court heard an interlocutory application' and a stay was granted till the matter was decided by the Constitutional Bench. The Election Commission was forced to withdraw its guidelines because the Supreme Court was disinclined to accept the contentions of the Commission. As of now, the Election Commission has withdrawn its guidelines and, therefore, the controversy has abated. However, matters of substantial Constitutional importance are involved in the controversy, viz., the nature of guidelines of the EC exit polls and opinion polls and their standing in a constitutional democracy in the context of the freedom of speech and expression. This article attempts to analyse the controversies and legal issues involved therein. The Dilemma of Exit Polls Like any other statistical device, exit and opinion polls are prone to errors. The DD-DRS in 1998 and DD-CSDS in 1996 were almost on target while Lokmat in 1999 and TVI-ORG in 1998 were wide off the mark. * m Year, B.A., LL.B.
    [Show full text]