The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, V17 Part06-08
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Volume 17. Triple Part 6-8 pp. 161-256; 1 pi. 8th April 1960 THE BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE The Official Organ of THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Edited by R. V. MELVILLE Assistant Secretary to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Contents Page Notices prescribed by the International Congress of Zoology: Date of commencement by the International Commission on Zoological Nomen¬ clature of voting on applications published in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 161 Notice ofthe possible use by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature of its plenary powers in certain cases ... ... ... ... 161 {continued inside back wrapper) LONDON: Printed by Order of the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature and Sold on behalf of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature by the International Trust at its Publications Office, 19, Belgrave Square, London, S.W.I 1960 Price Three Pounds, Five Shillings (All rights reserved) Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE A. The Officers of the Commission President: Professor James Chester Bradley (Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., U.S.A.) (12 August 1953) Vice-President: Senhor Dr. Afranio cTo Amaral (Sao Paulo, Brazil) (12 August 1953) Secretary : Mr. N. D. Riley (British Museum (Natural History), London) (23 July 1958) Assistant Secretary: Dr. W. E. China (c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S.W.I) B. The Members of the Commission (Arranged in order of precedence by reference to date of election or of most recent re-election, as prescribed by the International Congress of Zoology) Senhor Dr. Afranio do Amaral (S. Paulo, Brazil) (12 August 1953) (Vice-President) Professor J. R. Dymond (University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) (12 August 1953) Professor J. Chester Bradley (Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., U.S.A.) (12 August 1953) (President) Professor Harold E. Vokes (University of Tulane, Department of Geology, Nev> Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.) (12 August 1953) Dr. Norman R. Stoll (Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.) (12 August 1953) Dr. L. B. Holthijts (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands) (12 August 1953) Dr. K. H. L. Key (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia) (15 October 1954) Dr. Alden H. Miller (Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.) (29 October 1954) Doc. Dr. Ferdinand Prantl (Ndrodni Museum v Praze, Prague, Czechoslovakia) (30 October 1954) Professor Dr. Wilhelm Kuhnelt (Zoologisches Institut der Universitat, Vienna, Austria) (6 November 1954) Professor Ernst Mayr (Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, Cambridge, Massa¬ chusetts, U.S.A.) (4 December 1954) Professor Enrico Tortonese (Museo di Storia Naturale " G. Doria ", Genova, Italy) (16 December 1954) Dr. Per. Brinck (Lunds Universitets, Zoologisha Institution, Lund, Sweden) (19 May 1958) Dr. Max Poll (Musee du Congo Beige, Tervuren, Belgium) (12 July 1958) Professor H. Boschma (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands) (23 July 1958) Senor Dr. Angel Cabrera (La Plata, Argentina) (23 July 1958) Mr. Francis Hemming (London, England) (23 July 1958) Dr. Henning Lemche (Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark) (23 July 1958) Professor Pierre Bonnet (Universite de Toulouse, France) (23 July 1958) Mr. Norman Denbigh Riley (British Museum (Natural History), London) (23 July 1958) (Secretary) Professor Dr. Tadeusz Jaczewski (Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland) (23 July 1958) Professor Dr. Robert Mertens (Natur-Museum u. Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, Frankfurt a.M., Germany) (23 July 1958) Professor Dr. Erich Martin Hering (Zoologisches Museum der Humboldt-Universitdt zu Berlin, Germany) (23 July 1958) Dr. D. V. Obrtjchev (Palaeontological Institute, Academy of Sciences, Moscow B-71, USSR) (5 November 1958) Professor Tohru Uchida (Department of Zoology, Hokkaido University, Japan) (24 March 1959) Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Volume 17, Triple Part 6-8 (pp. 161-256) 8th April 1960 NOTICES (a) Date of Commencement of Voting.—In normal circumstances the Commission starts to vote on applications published in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature six months after the publication of each application. Any zoologist who wishes to comment on any of the applications in the present part is invited to send his contribution, in duplicate, to the Secretariat of the Commission as quickly as possible, and in any case in time to reach the Secretariat before the close of the six-month period. (b) Possible use of the plenary powers.—The possible use by the Commission of its plenary powers is involved in the following applications published in the present part of the Bulletin :—• (1) Validation of the generic name Delphax Eabricius, 1798 (Class Insecta, Order Hemiptera) (Z.N.(S.) 47); (2) Validation of the family-group name pleuroceridae Fischer, 1885 (Class Gastropoda) (Z.N.(S.) 83) ; (3) Validation of the generic name Idotea Fabricius, 1798 (Class Crustacea, Order Isopoda) (Z.N.(S.) 412); (4) Designation of a type-species for the nominal genus Macropsis Lewis, 1834, (Class Insecta, Order Hemiptera) (Z.N.(S.) 456) ; (5) Suppression of the generic name Promecopsis Dumeril, 1806 (Class Insecta, Order Hemiptera) (Z.N.(S.) 483); (6) Validation of the specific name dentipes Guerin, 1832 (Alpheus) (Class Crustacea, Order Decapoda) (Z.N.(S.) 643); (7) Validation of the generic name Parapenaeus S. I. Smith, 1885, and interpretation of the nominal species Peneus membranaceus Risso, 1816 (Class Crustacea, Order Decapoda) (Z.N.(S.) 645); (8) Suppression of the specific name longicorne Latreille, 1804 (Acrydium) (Class Insecta, Order Orthoptera) (Z.N.(S.) 675) ; (9) Stabilization of the names of the North European species of the Tipula oleracea group within the genus Tipula (Class Insecta, Order Diptera) (Z.N.(S.) 896); (10) Suppression of the generic name Spatagus Muller, 1776 (Class Echinoidea) (Z.N.(S.) 195); (11) Suppression of the generic name Drepanis Brisson, 1760 (Class Aves) (Z.N.(S.) 901); (12) Designation of a type-species for the nominal genus Sphaero- coryphe Angelin, 1854 (Class Trilobita) (Z.N.(S.) 1152); (13) Validation of the familiar usage of the generic name Tanytarsus van der Wulp, 1874 (Class Insecta, Order Diptera) (Z.N.(S.) 1245) ; (14) Designation of a neotype for the nominal species Dytiscus cinereus Linnaeus, 1758 (Class Insecta, Order Coleoptera) (Z.N.(S.) 1389) ; A Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries 162 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature (15) Validation of the generic name Acilius Leach, 1817 (Class Insecta, Order Coleoptera) (Z.N.(S.) 1391); (16) Validation of the specific name dardanus Brown, 1776 (Pa/pilio) (Class Insecta, Order Lepidoptera) (Z.N.(S.) 1403); c/o British Museum (Natural History), W. E. CHINA Cromwell Boad, Assistant Secretary London, S.W.7, England. International Commission on 1st October 1959. Zoological Nomenclature COMMENT ON DR. J. WEIR'S REQUEST FOR A RULING ON THE INTER¬ PRETATION OF THE NOMINAL SPECIES UNIO PHILLIPSII WILLIAMSON, 1836. Z.N.(S.) 1938 By L. R. Cox (British Museum (Natural History)) In submitting an application that a certain specimen should serve as the standard ofreference for the interpretation of the nominal species Unio pMUipsii Williamson, which (having been founded on a number of specimens) clearly had no holotype, Dr. J. Weir has been faced with the problem that the type-specimen so designated would not comply with the requirements of a lectotype (since there is no proof that would satisfy a judge and jury that it was a syntype, although there is a strong probability that it was one), while it could not become a neotype since there is no proof that would satisfy a judge and jury that all the original syntypes are lost or destroyed. This is but one of many eases where there is no certain evidence (such as the original publication of accurate figures, the citation of registration numbers, or the marking of specimens) that any particular specimen or specimens preserved in the collection of the author of a species must be the holotype or syntypes, for there is always the possibility that specimens were added to the collection subsequent to the description of the species. Apart from recognising and proposing a name for yet another category of type-specimen having the status of a holotype, lectotype, or neotype, it appears that the only solution of this unfortunate difficulty will be to refrain from stipulating that a neotype may be designated only when the original holotype or syntypes are lost or destroyed, and to re-define a neotype as follows:—"A single specimen selected to serve as the ultimate standard of reference for the interpretation of a nominal species when the original holotype or syntypes are lost or destroyed, or cannot be identified with certainty." There could be a recommendation that, in this last contingency, the specimen selected as neotype should come from the collection of the author of the species, if this collection is still in existence. I support Dr. Weir's application that the Manchester Museum specimen L.10106 should be designated as type-specimen of the nominal species Unio pMUipsii and suggest