DOCSLIB.ORG

Klapalekiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

, SUPPLEMETUM KLAPALEKIANA VOL. 43, SUPPLEMENTUM ISSN 1210-6100 Vol. 43 2007 Katalog vodních brouků České republiky Catalogue of water beetles of the Czech Republic KLAPALEKIANA KLAPALEKIANA Pokračování titulu Zprávy Československé společnosti entomologické při ČSAV (ISSN 0862-478X). Vydává Česká společnost entomologická. A continuation of Zprávy Československé společnosti entomologické při ČSAV (ISSN 0862-478X). Published by the Czech Entomological Society. Časopis je pojmenován po prof. Františku Klapálkovi (1863-1919), prvním předsedovi České společnosti entomologické v létech 1904-1919. The journal is named in honour of Prof. František Klapálek (1863-1919), the fi rst chairman of the Czech Entomological Society during 1904-1919. Redakční rada/Editorial Board: Roman Borovec, David S. Boukal, Zdeněk Černý, Martin Fikáček, Jan Horák, Petr Kment, David Král, Jan Liška, Pavel Moravec, Jan Růžička (výkonný redaktor / Executive Editor), Jaromír Strejček, Jaroslav Šťastný, Jiří Ch. Vávra, Jan Vitner (předseda a výkonný redaktor / Chairman and Executive Editor), Vladimír Vrabec. Rozšiřuje vydavatel. Objednávky a rukopisy zasílejte na adresu: Česká společnost entomologická, Viničná 7, 128 00 Praha 2. Distributed by the Publisher. Orders and manuscripts should be sent to the Czech Entomolo- gical Society, Viničná 7, CZ-128 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic. Cena ročníku (bez supplement): Česká republika: 500,- Kč zahraničí: 30,- USD (US$) Annual subscription rates (excl. supplements): Czech Republic: CZK (Kč) 500,- All other countries: USD (US$) 30,- Sazba/Typeset by: Jaroslav Šťastný. Vytiskla/Printed by: Tiskárna Flora, s.r.o., Praha. ISSN 1210-6100 Klapalekiana Vol. 43, Supplementum 2007, December 30 © Česká společnost entomologická, Praha, 2007. Excerpováno/covered by: Entomology Abstracts, Zoological Record. CHECKLIST_OBALKA_STR_2-3.indd 2 1.7.2008 9:34:26 Published December 30, 2007 Klapalekiana, 43 (Suppl.): 1-289, 2007 ISSN 1210-6100 Katalog vodních brouků České republiky Catalogue of water beetles of the Czech Republic (Coleoptera: Sphaeriusidae, Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Noteridae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Helophoridae, Georissidae, Hydrochidae, Spercheidae, Hydrophilidae, Hydraenidae, Scirtidae, Elmidae, Dryopidae, Limnichidae, Heteroceridae, Psephenidae) David S. BOUKAL1), Milan BOUKAL2), Martin FIKÁČEK3, 4), Jiří HÁJEK4), Jan KLEČKA5), Stanislav SKALICKÝ6), Jaroslav ŠŤASTNÝ7) & Dušan TRÁVNÍČEK8) 1) Department of Theoretical Biology, Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre AS CR, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] 2) Kpt. Bartoše 409, CZ-530 09 Pardubice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 3) Department of Zoology, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 4) Department of Entomology, National Museum, Kunratice 1, CZ-148 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 5) Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, South Bohemian University, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] 6) Dukla 322, CZ-562 01 Ústí nad Orlicí, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 7) Kosmonautů 359, CZ-460 05 Liberec, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 8) Museum of South-Eastern Moravia in Zlín, Soudní 1, 762 57 Zlín, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Faunistics, new records, ecological characteristics, bioindicator status, conservation, Coleoptera, Sphaeriu- sidae, Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Noteridae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Helophoridae, Georissidae, Hydrochidae, Spercheidae, Hydrophilidae, Hydraenidae, Scirtidae, Elmidae, Dryopidae, Limnichidae, Heteroceridae, Psephenidae, Czech Republic, Palaearctic region Abstract. This catalogue summarizes the present knowledge on the distribution of 18 families of water beetles in the Czech Republic (CZ). The initial chapters provide a brief introduction into the history of research on water beetles in CZ and basic information on the collecting techniques, rearing and preservation of specimens, ecological characteristics based on habitat preferences, bioindicator groups, and conservation of water beetles in CZ. Chapters on individual families include their brief characteristics, a check-list, and comments on all species. For each species, the comment includes its distribution overall and in CZ, brief ecological characteristics, and conservation status in CZ. Detailed faunistic data are provided only for selected rare species. At present, 401 species of the water beetle families covered in this catalogue are known from CZ: one species of the Sphaeriusidae, 11 species of the Gyrinidae, 18 species of the Haliplidae, one species of the Hygrobiidae, two species of the Noteridae, 132 species of the Dytiscidae, 28 species of the Helophoridae, three species of the Georis- sidae, six species of the Hydrochidae, one species of the Spercheidae, 77 species of the Hydrophilidae, 51 species of the Hydraenidae, 24 species of the Scirtidae, 19 species of the Elmidae, 12 species of the Dryopidae, four species of the Limnichidae, 10 species of the Heteroceridae, and one species of the Psephenidae. We do not regard as part of the Czech fauna three species of the Haliplidae, 13 species of the Dytiscidae, four species of the Helophoridae, six species of the Hydrophilidae, two species of the Hydraenidae, four species of the Elmidae, and one species of the Heteroceridae, in which all previous records proved erroneous: Haliplus apicalis Thomson, 1868, H. lineolatus Mannerheim, 1844, and H. mucronatus Stephens, 1828 (all Haliplidae); Agabus biguttulus Thomson, 1867, A. clypealis Thomson, 1867, Bidessus pumilus (Aubé, 1836), Colymbetes paykulii 1 Erichson, 1837, Deronectes aubei aubei (Mulsant, 1843), D. opatrinus (Germar, 1824), Graptodytes fl avipes (Olivier, 1795), Hydroporus foveolatus Heer, 1839, H. jonicus Miller, 1862, H. nigellus Mannerheim, 1853 (mentioned as H. tartaricus LeConte, 1850, in the literature), Ilybius angustior (Gyllenhal, 1808), and I. erichsoni (Gemminger et Harold, 1868) (all Dytiscidae); Helophorus laticollis Thomson, 1853, H. pumilio Erichson, 1837, H. rufi pes (Bosc, 1791), and H. schmidti Villa et Villa, 1838 (all Helophoridae); Anacaena rufi pes (Guillebeau, 1896), Berosus affi nis Brullé, 1935, B. bispina Reiche et Saulcy, 1856, B. spinosus (Steven, 1808), Helochares punctatus Sharp, 1869, and Paracymus relaxus Rey, 1884 (all Hydrophilidae); Hydraena angulosa Mulsant, 1844, and H. angustata Sturm, 1836 (both Hydraenidae); Normandia nitens (Ph. Müller, 1817), N. sodalis (Erichson, 1847), Oulimnius troglodytes (Gyllenhal, 1827), and Stenelmis canaliculata (Gyllenhal, 1808) (all Elmidae); and Augyles crinitus Kisenwetter, 1850 (Heteroceridae). On the other hand, we report as new for CZ three species of the Dytiscidae, three species of the Helophoridae, and four species of the Hydrophilidae: Hydroporus dobrogeanus Ieniştea, 1962, based on specimens from Moravia, Nebrioporus assimilis (Paykull, 1798) from Bohemia, and Porhydrus obliquesignatus (Bielz, 1852) from Moravia (all Dytiscidae); Helophorus brevitarsis Kuwert, 1890, from Moravia, H. tuberculatus Gyllenhal, 1808, from Bohemia, and H. villosus Duftschmid, 1805, from Moravia (all Helophoridae); and Chaetarthria simillima Vorst et Cuppen, 2003, from both Bohemia and Moravia, Cercyon alpinus Vogt, 1969, from Bohemia, C. hungaricus Endrödy-Younga, 1967, from Moravia, and C. inquinatus Wollaston, 1864, from Bohemia (all Hydrophilidae). Moreover, we provide the fi rst Bohemian and Moravian records for the following species: Helophorus paraminu- tus Angus, 1986, from Bohemia and H. strigifrons Thomson, 1868, from Moravia (both Helophoridae); Hydrochus brevis (Herbst, 1793) and H. megaphallus Berge Henegouwen, 1988, from Bohemia (both Hydrochidae); Hydraena truncata truncata Rey, 1885, Ochthebius lividipennis Peyron, 1858, and O. peisonis Ganglbauer, 1901, from Bohemia (all Hydraenidae); Elodes pseudominuta Klausnitzer, 1971, from Moravia (Scirtidae); and Dryops similaris Bollow, 1936, from Moravia (Dryopidae). For the following species we also confi rm their occurrence in CZ, Bohemia or Moravia, or provide the fi rst detailed data for records previously published in other catalogues and papers: Gyrinus suffriani Scriba, 1855, in Moravia (Gyrinidae); Hydroporus fuscipennis Schaum, 1868, in Moravia, and Hyphydrus aubei Ganglbauer, 1891, in CZ (from Moravia) (both Dytiscidae); Helophorus discrepans Rey, 1885, in CZ (from Moravia), and H. nivalis Giraud, 1852, in CZ (from Bohemia and Moravia) (both Helophoridae); Enochrus fuscipennis (Thomson, 1884) in Bohemia, Laccobius simulatrix Orchymont, 1932, and L. colon (Stephens, 1829) in Moravia, Sphaeridium bipustu- latum Fabricius, 1781, in CZ (from Bohemia and Moravia), and S. substriatum Faldermann, 1838, in Bohemia (all Hydrophilidae); Aulacochthebius narentinus Reitter, 1885, in CZ (from Bohemia and Moravia), Hydraena egoni Jäch, 1986, H. gracilis balcanica Orchymont, 1930, and Ochthebius alpinus (Ieniştea, 1979) in CZ (all from Bohemia), O. lividipennis Peyron, 1858, and O. meridionalis Rey, 1885, from Moravia, and O. sidanus Orchymont, 1942, in CZ (from Moravia) (all Hydraenidae); Odeles gredleri (Kiesenwetter, 1863) in CZ (from Bohemia) (Scirtidae); Elmis rioloides (Kuwert, 1890) in Moravia (Elmidae); and Dryops anglicanus Edwards, 1909, in CZ (from Bohemia) and D. griseus (Erichson, 1847) in CZ (from Bohemia and Moravia) (both Dryopidae). 2 OBSAH / CONTENTS ÚVOD / INTRODUCTION (J. Šťastný) ............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/32097 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2019-01-28 and may be subject to change. Matching species to a changing landscape -Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape- ISBN: 978-90-9022753-5 Layout: A.M. Antheunisse Printed by: Gildeprint Drukkerijen B.V. © 2008 W.C.E.P. Verberk; all rights reserved. Verberk W.C.E.P. (2008) Matching species to a changing landscape - Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen. This research project was financed by the program Development and Management of Nature Quality (O+BN) of the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (project number 3911773). Matching species to a changing landscape -Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape- Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 7 maart 2008 om 10:30 uur precies door Wilhelmus Cornelis Egbertus Petrus Verberk geboren op 30 juni 1976 te Oploo, Nederland Promotores: Prof. dr. H. Siepel Prof. dr. G. van der Velde (Vrije Universiteit, Brussel) Copromotores: Dr. R.S.E.W. Leuven Dr. P.F.M. Verdonschot (Alterra, Wageningen UR) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. J.M.
  • Water Beetles

    Water Beetles

    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
  • Vysvětlivky Platnost Od 13. 6. 2021

    Vysvětlivky Platnost Od 13. 6. 2021

    Loukov u Mnichova Hradiště ( S30 ) Skalka u Doks Loukov Schéma příměstských linek Pražsk697 é integrou Mnichova vané dopravy Doksy Zbyny Hradiště Vrchovany 697 L4 R22 S30 697 697 Horecký Důl Dubá 697 Březina 697 Tachov Bezděz Korce 697 L4 R22 nad Jizerou 697 S30 Okna Nedamov L4 697 697 9 Křenov Ždírec Mnichovo 697 697 Mimo Hradiště S30 R21 Blatce Tarif PID 697 Žďár platnost od Kruh 697 Bělá pod 1. 9. 2021 Osinalice 697 Medonosy 691 Houska Bezdězem Jizera 691 Tubož 697 L4 R22 Malá 697 Bělá Osinaličky Střezivojice L4 Kněžmost 474 Buda S35 691 Konrádov S35 697 Dobřeň Nosálov Bakov 474 Libovice 693 nad Jizerou Chudolazy Olešno 693 8 S30 S35 L4 691 Vidim 697 R21 R22 Záluží 691 Lobeč Doubravice Lítkovice U4 Jestřebice Vojtěchov 693 S35 474 695 693 Štětí Šemanovice Ráj 369 S32 R23 692 695 Líny 697 Trnová [635] [672] 693 S33 S33 Obrubce Březinka Skramouš Sudoměř Sitné S35 Dobříň Hněvice 692 Sedlec 693 S33 693 S33 Předonín S4=U4 R20 692 Bukovno Labe U4 [683] [672] [683] Tupadly 689 Dolní [635] [672] 691 Vrátno S33 Počeplice Kokořín Hradsko 689 728 Katusice Bousov Ješovice 689 Mšeno 693 S33 S33 S35 369 369 Dolní Truskavna 474 692 S33 Kluky 692 668 689 690 693 728 Zimoř 694 695 693 695 696 Bechov Rohatsko 692 694 Kanina 697 728 S33 Skalsko Mladá S33 S33 Roudnice n. L. Želízy Janova Ves 668 696 467 U4 U21 R20 [368] [635] Bechlín 691 692 Tajná 728 729 475 [635] [683] 474 694 S33 689 728 S33 [636] [646] [672] [680] [681] Horní 694 Stránka Ostrý 7 Chodeč Kokořínský [683] [684] [685] [687] 668 690 689 Boleslav Březno Krabčice Počaply 694 Bosyně Důl 416
  • Download Als PDF

    Download Als PDF

    Dieses PDF wird von der Arbeitsgemeinschaft bayerischer Entomologen e.V.für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch zur Verfügung gestellt. Die kommerzielle Nutzung oder die Bereitstellung in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek oder auf einer website ist nicht gestattet. Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 8:4987, Bamberg (2006), ISSN 1430-015X Regionalisierte und kommentierte Checkliste der Wasserkäfer Bayerns (Stand 2005) (Insecta: Coleoptera aquatica) von Ullrich Heckes, Monika Hess, Günter Hofmann, Heinz Bußler, André Skale, Jürgen Schmidl & Franz Hebauer Summary: In addition to the recently published revision of the red list of threatened and endangered animals we present a regionalized checklist of the waterbeetles of Bavaria. Moreover we add comments on selected rare, newly recorded or rediscov- ered species and remarkable records and point out nomenclatural alterations. Zusammenfassung: Im Nachgang zur Neufassung der Roten Listen Bayerns wird eine nach Naturraumgruppen regionalisierte Checkliste der Wasserkäfer für den Bezugsraum vorgestellt. Ausgewählte seltene Arten, Erst- und Wiederfunde, bemerkenswerte Nachweise und nomenklatorische Neuerungen werden kommentiert bzw. dokumentiert. Einleitung Im Zuge der Vorarbeiten zur Neufassung der Roten Liste gefährdeter Wasserkäfer Bayerns (Hebauer et al., [2004]) waren in größerem Umfang aktuelle faunistische Daten zusammenzutragen und Altmeldungen gegenüber zu stellen. Die Autoren kamen überein, diese Arbeiten auch nach dem Erscheinen der Roten Liste weiter zu führen und zur Aufstellung einer Checkliste zu nutzen. Die hiermit vorgelegte kommentierte Liste versteht sich als Aktualisierung und Fortschreibung des Katalogs der bayerischen Wasserkäfer (Hebauer, 1994a, Stand August 1992), der ersten und bislang einzigen Zusammenstellung dieser Art für das Bundesland. Wesentliche Neuerung ist eine nach naturräumlichen Regionen differenzierte Darstellung mit grober artbezogener Bilanzierung der Anzahl bekannter Fundorte.
  • Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Rasa Bukontaite1,2*, Kelly B Miller3 and Johannes Bergsten1

    Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Rasa Bukontaite1,2*, Kelly B Miller3 and Johannes Bergsten1

    Bukontaite et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2014, 14:5 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/14/5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The utility of CAD in recovering Gondwanan vicariance events and the evolutionary history of Aciliini (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Rasa Bukontaite1,2*, Kelly B Miller3 and Johannes Bergsten1 Abstract Background: Aciliini presently includes 69 species of medium-sized water beetles distributed on all continents except Antarctica. The pattern of distribution with several genera confined to different continents of the Southern Hemisphere raises the yet untested hypothesis of a Gondwana vicariance origin. The monophyly of Aciliini has been questioned with regard to Eretini, and there are competing hypotheses about the intergeneric relationship in the tribe. This study is the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis focused on the tribe Aciliini and it is based on eight gene fragments. The aims of the present study are: 1) to test the monophyly of Aciliini and clarify the position of the tribe Eretini and to resolve the relationship among genera within Aciliini, 2) to calibrate the divergence times within Aciliini and test different biogeographical scenarios, and 3) to evaluate the utility of the gene CAD for phylogenetic analysis in Dytiscidae. Results: Our analyses confirm monophyly of Aciliini with Eretini as its sister group. Each of six genera which have multiple species are also supported as monophyletic. The origin of the tribe is firmly based in the Southern Hemisphere with the arrangement of Neotropical and Afrotropical taxa as the most basal clades suggesting a Gondwana vicariance origin. However, the uncertainty as to whether a fossil can be used as a stem-or crowngroup calibration point for Acilius influenced the result: as crowngroup calibration, the 95% HPD interval for the basal nodes included the geological age estimate for the Gondwana break-up, but as a stem group calibration the basal nodes were too young.
  • Supertramp New Guinea Highland Origin of a Widespread Arthropod

    Supertramp New Guinea Highland Origin of a Widespread Arthropod

    Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on 7 April 2009 New Guinea highland origin of a widespread arthropod supertramp Michael Balke, Ignacio Ribera, Lars Hendrich, Michael A. Miller, Katayo Sagata, Aloysius Posman, Alfried P. Vogler and Rudolf Meier Proc. R. Soc. B published online 1 April 2009 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0015 Supplementary data "Data Supplement" http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2009/03/30/rspb.2009.0015.DC1.h tml References This article cites 41 articles, 12 of which can be accessed free http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/03/26/rspb.2009.0015.full.ht ml#ref-list-1 P<P Published online 1 April 2009 in advance of the print journal. Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections taxonomy and systematics (70 articles) ecology (491 articles) evolution (564 articles) Email alerting service Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article or click here Advance online articles have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet appeared in the paper journal (edited, typeset versions may be posted when available prior to final publication). Advance online articles are citable and establish publication priority; they are indexed by PubMed from initial publication. Citations to Advance online articles must include the digital object identifier (DOIs) and date of initial publication. To subscribe to Proc. R. Soc. B go to: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2009 The Royal Society Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on 7 April 2009 Proc.
  • 1 Distribution of Hottonia Palustris in the Czech Republic

    1 Distribution of Hottonia Palustris in the Czech Republic

    Kaplan et al., Preslia 88: 459–544, 2016 Distribution of Hottonia palustris in the Czech Republic Author of the map: Jan Prančl Map produced on: 11-11-2016 Database records used for producing the distribution map of Hottonia palustris published in Preslia. Coordinate system: WGS84. The mapping symbols used in the distribution map to indicate the different attributes of the occurrence in a particular grid cell. Attribute distinguished Symbol Attribute state None P all records Time P recent occurrence (at least one record since 2000) P old occurrence (all records before 2000, or demonstrably being extirpated from all localities after 2000, or all records undated) Origin P native (at least one record) × alien Source data P a revised herbarium specimen (at least one record) G all other All ? only record(s) uncertain regarding identification and/or locality 1 Kaplan et al., Preslia 88: 459–544, 2016 Abbreviations of projects (data sources): ČNFD: Czech National Phytosociological Database (managed by Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University) DLT: Database of Forest Typology (managed by Forest Management Institute of the Czech Republic) Excerpce Atlas: Taxonomic Experts’ Records for Atlas of the Distribution of Vascular Plants in the Czech Republic (managed by Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences) FK ČBS: Records from the Floristic Summer Schools of the Czech Botanical Society (managed by Czech Botanical Society) FLDOK: Database of the Distribution of Vascular Plants in the Czech Republic (managed by Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences) ND JčP ČBS: Floristic Database of the South Bohemian Branch of the Czech Botanical Society (managed by South Bohemian Branch of the Czech Botanical Society) ND MSP ČBS: (managed by Moravian-Silesian Branch of the Czech Botanical Society) NDOP: Species Occurrence Database (managed by Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic) Slavíkův archiv: Floristic Archive of B.
  • Katastrální Území: Dvory U Nymburka)

    Katastrální Území: Dvory U Nymburka)

    DVORY (KATASTRÁLNÍ ÚZEMÍ: DVORY U NYMBURKA) ODŮVODNĚNÍ NÁVRHU ÚZEMNÍHO PLÁNU - TEXTOVÁ ČÁST PAFF - architekti PROSINEC 2007 POŘIZOVATEL: Městský úřad Nymburk adresa: Městský úřad Nymburk, Odbor výstavby Náměstí Přemyslovců 163 288 28 Nymburk Obec Dvory adresa: Obec Dvory Obecní úřad č. p. 3 288 02 pošta Nymburk ZHOTOVITEL: Ing. arch. Ladislav Bareš atelier: PAFF - architekti Ing. arch. Ladislav Bareš Ing. arch. Michaela Štádlerová Ing. arch. Roman Štádler adresa: PAFF - architekti Na Zájezdu 18/1946 101 00 Praha 10 tel./fax: 224 320 264 email: [email protected] .................................................................................... Ing. arch. Ladislav Bareš OBSAH: ODŮVODNĚNÍ NÁVRHU ÚP DVORY - TEXTOVÁ ČÁST a) Vyhodnocení koordinace využívání území z hlediska širších vztahů v území 1 a.1) Základní údaje o řešeném území 1 Úhrnné hodnoty druhů pozemků Sousední územní obvody Příslušnost k vybraným úřadům státní správy Účast ve sdružení obcí a.2) Vyhodnocení koordinace využívání území z hlediska širších vztahů v území 1 a.3) Vyhodnocení souladu s požadavky vyplývajícími z ÚP VÚC 1 b) Údaje o splnění zadání, údaje o splnění pokynů pro zpracování návrhu 1 c) Komplexní zdůvodnění přijatého řešení 1 Obyvatelstvo Návrhová velikost Stavební a bytový fond Ekonomická základna c.1) Doplňující informace a zdůvodnění k návrhu ÚP Dvory (ve členění textové části návrhu ÚP) 2 ad a) Vymezení zastavěného území ad b.3) Ochrana hodnot vyplývajících z historického a urbanistického vývoje ad b.4) Ochrana hodnot vyplývajících z přírodních a dalších podmínek
  • Crossness Sewage Treatment Works Nature Reserve & Southern Marsh Aquatic Invertebrate Survey

    Crossness Sewage Treatment Works Nature Reserve & Southern Marsh Aquatic Invertebrate Survey

    Commissioned by Thames Water Utilities Limited Clearwater Court Vastern Road Reading RG1 8DB CROSSNESS SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS NATURE RESERVE & SOUTHERN MARSH AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Report number: CPA18054 JULY 2019 Prepared by Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 30a Alexandra Rd London N8 0PP 1 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 1.1 Introduction and background 1.1.1 On 30th May 2018 Colin Plant Associates (UK) were commissioned by Biodiversity Team Manager, Karen Sutton on behalf of Thames Water Utilities Ltd. to undertake aquatic invertebrate sampling at Crossness Sewage Treatment Works on Erith Marshes, Kent. This survey was to mirror the locations and methodology of a previous survey undertaken during autumn 2016 and spring 2017. Colin Plant Associates also undertook the aquatic invertebrate sampling of this previous survey. 1.1.2 The 2016-17 aquatic survey was commissioned with the primary objective of establishing a baseline aquatic invertebrate species inventory and to determine the quality of the aquatic habitats present across both the Nature Reserve and Southern Marsh areas of the Crossness Sewage Treatment Works. The surveyors were asked to sample at twenty-four, pre-selected sample station locations, twelve in each area. Aquatic Coleoptera and Heteroptera (beetles and true bugs) were selected as target groups. A report of the previous survey was submitted in Sept 2017 (Plant 2017). 1.1.3 During December 2017 a large-scale pollution event took place and untreated sewage escaped into a section of the Crossness Nature Reserve. The primary point of egress was Nature Reserve Sample Station 1 (NR1) though because of the connectivity of much of the waterbody network on the marsh other areas were affected.
  • Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites

    Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites

    Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 14 December 2020 BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON LOCAL SITES PARTNERSHIP 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. HISTORY OF THE CWS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... 7 3. CURRENT CWS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Nature Conservation Review CRITERIA (modified version) ............................................................................. 10 5. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 14 6 SITE SELECTION THRESHOLDS........................................................................................................................ 15 BOUNDARIES (all CWS) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 WOODLAND, TREES and HEDGES ........................................................................................................................ 15 TRADITIONAL ORCHARDS AND FRUIT TREES ................................................................................................. 19 ARABLE FIELD MARGINS........................................................................................................................................
  • Annales Zoologici Fennici 39: 109-123

    Annales Zoologici Fennici 39: 109-123

    ANN. ZOOL. FENNICI Vol. 39 • Dispersing diving beetles in different landscapes 109 Ann. Zool. Fennici 39: 109–123 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 14 June 2002 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2002 Dispersing diving beetles (Dytiscidae) in agricultural and urban landscapes in south-eastern Sweden Elisabeth Lundkvist*, Jan Landin & Fredrik Karlsson Department of Biology, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden (*e-mail: [email protected]) Received 6 April 2001, accepted 15 October 2001 Lundkvist, E., Landin, J. & Karlsson, F. 2002: Dispersing diving beetles (Dytiscidae) in agricultural and urban landscapes in south-eastern Sweden. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 39: 109–123. Flying dytiscids were trapped in an agricultural landscape with wetlands in different successional stages and in two urban landscapes with young wetlands. We compared the faunas in air and in water. Hydroporus and Agabus were the most frequently trapped genera in air. Most species were trapped near water in the agricultural landscape; species characteristic of later successional stages were common in air and dominated in water. In the urban landscapes, species were mainly trapped far from water and species known to colonise new waters were common in air and in the youngest waters. Overall, females and immature adults were more common in fl ight catches during April–July than during August–October. Our results indicate that urbanisation would result in a less diverse fauna, but may lead to an assemblage dominated by species that are infrequent in agricultural landscapes. To obtain a rich wetland insect fauna, a wide range of wetland types is required at the landscape scale. Introduction both in space and time (Bilton 1994).
  • County Wexford Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2018

    County Wexford Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2018

    County Wexford Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2018 Endorsed by the Elected Members of Wexford County Council on the 11 th November 2013 Protecting County Wexford’s Biodiversity Through Actions and Raising Awareness COUNTY WEXFORD BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2013-2018 Endorsed by the Elected Members of Wexford County Council on the 11 th November 2013 To Protect County Wexford’s Biodiversity Through Actions and Raising Awareness ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to gratefully acknowledge all those who made a submission to the plan and the members of the Wexford Biodiversity Working Group for their valuable contribution to the plan. Thanks are also extended to the Steering Committee members, which included Cliona O’Brien from the Heritage Council and Lorcan Scott, NPWS. Thanks are also extended to Dr.Amanda Browne & Padraic Fogarty who prepared the audit and review of the biological resource. Art and photography credits are paid to the entrants of the 2011 Biodiversity Art and Photography competitions. ACRONYMS BAP – Biodiversity Action Plan BoCCI - Birds of Conservation Concern in Ireland BWG – Biodiversity Working Group cSACs - Candidate Special Areas of Conservation Flora Protection Order - Flora (Protection) Order, S.I. No. 94 of 1999. Habitats Directive - 1992 EU Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora IUCN - International Union for the Conservation of Nature NBAP – National Biodiversity Action Plan, (. National Biodiversity Action Plan, Dúchas. 2002, and ‘Actions for Biodiversity 2011-2016, Ireland’s National Biodiversity Plan’, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, 2011. NHA – Natural Heritage Area SAC – Special Area of Conservation SPA – Special Protection Area The Convention – UN Convention on Biological Diversity, signed at Rio Earth Summit 1992 The Guidelines – Guidelines for the Production of Local Biodiversity Action Plans, Heritage Council, 2003.