DOCSLIB.ORG

Mount Currie Nature Reserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mount Currie Nature Reserve MOUNT CURRIE NATURE RESERVE KwaZulu-Natal South Africa Protected Area Management Plan Developed: 2013 Prepared by Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife Protected Area Management Planning Unit and the Mount Currie Planning Committee Citation Mount Currie Nature Reserve: Management Plan. Version 1.0 (2013), Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg. MOUN T CURRIE NATURE RESE RVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN i AUTHORISATION This Protected Area Management Plan for Mount Currie Nature Reserve is recommended by the Mount Currie Nature Reserve Planning Committee (NRPC), a multi-disciplinary team consisting of: Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Desmond Archer District Conservation Manager Midlands Ntokozo Cele District Conservation Manager Sisonke Athol Marchant Regional Ecologist Steve McKean Resource Use Ecologist West Patrick Lowry Officer In Charge: Mount Currie Nature Reserve Magda Goosen Protected Area Management Planner MOUNT CURRIE NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN ii TABLE OF CONTENT AUTHORISATION .................................................................................................................................................. II APPROVAL ......................................................................................................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................. VI LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................. VIII LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ VIII LIST OF APPENDICEES ......................................................................................................................................... VIII LIST OF MAPS ..................................................................................................................................................... IX PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................. X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... XI ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................ XIII 1) BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of the plan ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Structure of the plan ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 The values of Mount Currie Nature Reserve ................................................................................... 4 1.5 Planning approach .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.5.1 Adaptive management ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.5.2 Collaboration and transparency ................................................................................................................. 7 2) DESCRIPTION OF MOUNT CURRIE NATURE RESERVE AND ITS CONTEXT .................................................................. 8 2.1 Institutional and administrative framework for the management of MCNR ................................. 8 2.2 The legislative basis for the management of Mount Currie Nature Reserve .................................. 8 2.2.1 Proclamation status of Mount Currie Nature Reserve................................................................................ 9 2.2.2 Invasive species control in terms of the Biodiversity Act ............................................................................ 9 2.3 The policy framework guiding the management of Mount Currie Nature Reserve ........................ 9 CORE VALUES ................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 The regional and local planning context of Mount Currie Nature Reserve ................................... 11 2.4.1 The National Protected Area Expansion Strategy ..................................................................................... 11 2.4.2 The Provincial Protected Area Expansion Plan ......................................................................................... 11 2.4.3 EIA Regulations in terms of NEMA ............................................................................................................ 12 2.5 The history of Mount Currie Nature Reserve ................................................................................ 12 2.5.1 Origins of the name of Mount Currie Nature Reserve .............................................................................. 12 2.5.2 History of conservation in Mount Currie Nature Reserve......................................................................... 12 2.5.3 History of eco-cultural tourism in Mount Currie Nature Reserve ............................................................. 13 2.6 Ecological context of Mount Currie Nature Reserve ..................................................................... 13 2.6.1 Climate and weather ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.6.2 Topography, Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................. 14 2.6.5 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.6.6 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.6.7 Fire regime ................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.6.8 Invasive species ........................................................................................................................................ 16 2.6.9 Mammalian fauna ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2.6.10 Avifauna ............................................................................................................................................... 17 2.6.11 Herpetofauna (reptiles and amphibians) ............................................................................................. 17 2.6.12 Invertebrates ........................................................................................................................................ 17 2.7 Cultural context of Mount Currie Nature Reserve ........................................................................ 18 2.8 Socio-economic context ................................................................................................................ 19 2.9 Operational management within Mount Currie Nature Reserve ................................................. 20 2.9.1 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................ 20 2.9.2 Staffing establishment .............................................................................................................................. 20 2.9.3 Funding levels at Mount Currie Nature Reserve ....................................................................................... 21 2.9.4 Management effectiveness in Mount Currie Nature Reserve .................................................................. 21 2.10 Summary of management issues, challenges and opportunities ................................................. 22 3) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 24 3.1 Mount Currie Nature Reserve vision ............................................................................................. 24 3.2 Objectives and strategic outcomes ............................................................................................... 24 4) ZONATION PLAN ........................................................................................................................................ 27 4.1 Zonation of Mount Currie Nature Reserve .................................................................................... 27 4.2 Concept development guidelines .................................................................................................. 29 MOUN T CURRIE NATURE RESE RVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN vi 4.2.1 Key Feature Protection Overlay ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fasanbi SHOWCASE
    Threatened Species Monitoring PROGRAMME Threatened Species in South Africa: A review of the South African National Biodiversity Institutes’ Threatened Species Programme: 2004–2009 Acronyms ADU – Animal Demography Unit ARC – Agricultural Research Council BASH – Big Atlassing Summer Holiday BIRP – Birds in Reserves Project BMP – Biodiversity Management Plan BMP-S – Biodiversity Management Plans for Species CFR – Cape Floristic Region CITES – Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CoCT – City of Cape Town CREW – Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers CWAC – Co-ordinated Waterbird Counts DEA – Department of Environmental Affairs DeJaVU – December January Atlassing Vacation Unlimited EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMI – Environmental Management Inspector GBIF – Global Biodiversity Information Facility GIS – Geographic Information Systems IAIA – International Association for Impact Assessment IAIAsa – International Association for Impact Assessment South Africa IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature LAMP – Long Autumn Migration Project LepSoc – Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa MCM – Marine and Coastal Management MOA – memorandum of agreement MOU – memorandum of understanding NBI – National Botanical Institute NEMA – National Environmental Management Act NEMBA – National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act NGO – non-governmental organization NORAD – Norwegian Agency for Development Co–operation QDGS – quarter-degree grid square SABAP – Southern African Bird Atlas Project SABCA – Southern African
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Conservation
    Biodivers Conserv (2007) 16:4095–4107 DOI 10.1007/s10531-007-9209-z ORIGINAL PAPER Key traits in a threatened butterfly and its common sibling: implications for conservation Michael J. Samways Æ Shen-Shan Lu Received: 22 February 2007 / Accepted: 14 June 2007 / Published online: 20 July 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract We ask here which traits predispose one species to extreme rarity and possible extinction while a sympatric sibling is geographically widespread. With background knowledge on the level of habitat specialization of the two species, the population structure and movement of the localized and threatened Orachrysops ariadne were compared to those of the common and highly sympatric O. subravus, using mark-release-recapture. Of a total of 290 marked O. ariadne individuals 42.8% were recaptured, while of 631 O. subravus individuals 49.3% were recaptured. The Jolly-Seber model was used to estimate daily population numbers (Ni), survival rates (/i), recruitment rates (Bi), proportion of marked animals in the total population (µi), and the number of marked animals at risk (Mi). O. ariadne is a remarkably rare animal, averaging only 10 individuals haÀ1 within its small, remaining colonies. Average residence times of male adults were generally similar in both species, being just over 5 days. O. ariadne is a strong and rapid back and forth flier, covering mean recapture distances of 157 m, almost twice that of O. subravus, principally in search of scarce nectar sources. In short, the rarity of O. ariadne is not so much to do with behaviour, survivorship or longevity, but rather with limited availability of the spe- cialized habitat patches for both larvae and adults, and, in particular, the extreme scarcity of the host plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation in Oak Savanna: Site Characterization, Nectar Resources, and the Effects of Management
    BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION IN OAK SAVANNA: SITE CHARACTERIZATION, NECTAR RESOURCES, AND THE EFFECTS OF MANAGEMENT Lauren E. Yarrish A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2011 Committee: Karen V. Root, Advisor Helen J. Michaels Jeffrey G. Miner ii ABSTRACT Karen V. Root, Advisor Oak savanna is a globally imperiled plant community characterized by scattered oak trees and an herbaceous ground layer. The Oak Openings Region in northwest Ohio was once dominated by oak savanna however, since European settlement the amount of oak savanna has been significantly reduced. Despite the large reduction in area, what remains continues to support high levels of biodiversity including several rare butterfly species such as the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). To improve butterfly conservation efforts, this study sought to characterize and compare oak savanna sites, determine how butterflies utilize nectar resources, and assess the effects of land management practices in the Oak Openings Region. We conducted vegetation surveys at four oak savanna sites. Transects were established at each site and a quadrat frame was placed every 10 m along the transects. At each quadrat we recorded several factors known to be important to butterflies, such as flowering plant density, canopy cover, vegetation height etc. We also conducted opportunistic behavioral observations of butterflies, recording behavior at 10 minute intervals. Lastly, we obtained land management records from local agencies. Sites varied greatly with respect to the measured factors. Flowering plant densities were low compared to a previous study used to evaluate potential reintroduction sites for the Karner blue butterfly in northwest Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Ecological Factors Influencing the Breeding Success of the Brenton Blue Butterfly, Orachrysops Niobe (Trimen) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    Edge.qxd 2005/12/09 10:02 Page 19 Some ecological factors influencing the breeding success of the Brenton Blue butterfly, Orachrysops niobe (Trimen) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) D.A. EDGE Edge, D.A. 2002. Some ecological factors influencing the breeding success of the Bren- ton Blue butterfly, Orachrysops niobe (Trimen) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Koedoe 45(2): 19–34. Pretoria. ISSN 0075-6458. The Brenton Blue butterfly, Orachrysops niobe (Trimen, 1862) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), is endemic to the southern Cape and is currently listed as Endangered. This study looks at some of the key ecological factors influencing the breeding success of the species—host plant abundance and condition, nectar sources, climate/ microclimate, and vegetation management techniques. The adult butterfly population was monitored over an entire breeding season; host plants were identified and individually monitored; and egg counts were done. This enabled the effects of a number of different manage- ment techniques to be evaluated (burning, cutting, physical removal of invasive ele- ments, and combinations thereof). A fivefold increase in the population of O. niobe was observed over the breeding season. This increase was positively correlated to a similar increase in host plant abundance in the areas where cutting and physical removal of invasive elements was practiced. Burning, by contrast, appeared to have a negative impact on host plant and butterfly abundance over the same period. Impacts of other fac- tors such as climate, nectar sources and the natural strength of the second brood are dis- cussed. A hypothesis, of megaherbivore activity as the principal historical disturbance mechanism promoting locally favourable conditions for O. niobe to establish and main- tain colonies, is proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species PROGRAMME Threatened Species: a Guide to Red Lists and Their Use in Conservation LIST of ABBREVIATIONS
    Threatened Species PROGRAMME Threatened Species: A guide to Red Lists and their use in conservation LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AOO Area of Occupancy BMP Biodiversity Management Plan CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species DAFF Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EOO Extent of Occurrence IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature NEMA National Environmental Management Act NEMBA National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act NGO Non-governmental Organization NSBA National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment PVA Population Viability Analysis SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute SANSA South African National Survey of Arachnida SIBIS SANBI's Integrated Biodiversity Information System SRLI Sampled Red List Index SSC Species Survival Commission TSP Threatened Species Programme Threatened Species: A guide to Red Lists and their use in conservation OVERVIEW The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)’s Red List is a world standard for evaluating the conservation status of plant and animal species. The IUCN Red List, which determines the risks of extinction to species, plays an important role in guiding conservation activities of governments, NGOs and scientific institutions, and is recognized worldwide for its objective approach. In order to produce the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™, the IUCN Species Programme, working together with the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and members of IUCN, draw on and mobilize a network of partner organizations and scientists worldwide. One such partner organization is the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), who, through the Threatened Species Programme (TSP), contributes information on the conservation status and biology of threatened species in southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Oviposition Selection in Montane Habitats, Biological Conservation
    Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 862–872 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Oviposition selection by a rare grass skipper Polites mardon in montane habitats: Advancing ecological understanding to develop conservation strategies Loni J. Beyer, Cheryl B. Schultz * Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Ave, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA article info abstract Article history: The Grass skipper subfamily (Hesperiinae) includes many at risk species across the globe. Conservation Received 31 March 2009 efforts for these skippers are hindered by insufficient information about their basic biology. Mardon skip- Received in revised form 3 November 2009 per (Polites mardon) is declining throughout its range. We surveyed mardon oviposition across nine study Accepted 25 December 2009 meadows in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest of Washington State. We conducted habitat surveys with Available online 21 January 2010 respect to oviposition (n = 269) and random (n = 270) locations, recording data on over 50 variables. Mar- don oviposited on 23 different graminoid species, yet are selective for specific graminoids within mead- Keywords: ows. Most frequent ovipositions across meadows occurred on Festuca idahoensis and Poa pratensis Butterfly (accounting for 112 of 269 total oviposition observations). Discriminant Function Analyses revealed that Graminoids Habitat preference mardon habitat was too variable to detect oviposition selection across study meadows, yet there was 2 Host selection strong selection occurring within meadows (r ranging from 0.82 to 0.99). Variables important to within Life history meadow selection were graminoid cover, height, and community; oviposition plant structure (leaf den- Management sity, height, area); insolation factors (tree abundance and canopy shading); and litter layer factors (cover Meadow and depth).
    [Show full text]
  • Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2003 Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Mathew, John. "Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation" (2003). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/v7rh-mb21 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/74 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYLOGENY, ECOLOGY, AND CONSERVATION by John Mathew B.Sc. June 1990, Madras Christian College M.Sc. June 1992, Madras Christian College M.Phil. May 1994, Madras University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2003 Approved by: Deborah A. Waller (Co-Director) »mi E. Pierce (Co-Director) H. Savitzky (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYTOGENY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION John Mathew Old Dominion University, 2003 Co-Directors of Advisory Committee: Dr. Deborah A. Waller Dr. Naomi E. Pierce Less than 1% of all Lepidoptera are aphytophagous; of these, a considerable proportion is found in the family Lycaenidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Orachrysops Vári, 1986
    14th edition (2015). Genus Orachrysops Vári, 1986 In: Vári & Kroon, 1986. South African lepidoptera. A series of cross-referenced indices: ix (198 pp.). Lepidopterists’ Society of Southern Africa and the Transvaal Museum, Pretoria. Type-species: Lycaena niobe Trimen, by original designation. Generic review by G.A. & S.F. Henning, 1994 (In: Pringle, Henning, & Ball [eds]. Pennington’s butterflies of southern Africa 2nd edition: 260-273 (800pp.). Struik-Winchester, South Africa. A purely Afrotropical genus containing 11 species. Until recently (1986) members of this exclusively southern African genus were included in the genus Lepidochrysops. Recent studies on the early stages of some species of Orachrysops has shown that they are probably phytophagous in all larval instars (Edge, 2005a; Edge & Van Hamburg, 2010), unlike the phyto-predacious Lepidochrysops. O. niobe group *Orachrysops ariadne (Butler, 1898)# Karkloof Blue Karkloof Blue (Orachrysops ariadne) male upperside (left) and underside (right) Images courtesy Steve Woodhall Catochrysops ariadne Butler, 1898. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1898: 193 (186-201). Neochrysops ariadne (Butler, 1898). Bethune-Baker, 1922. Lepidochrysops ariadne (Butler, 1898). Hedicke, 1923. Lepidochrysops ariadne Butler. Swanepoel, 1953a. Lepidochrysops ariadne (Butler, 1898). Dickson & Kroon, 1978. Orachrysops ariadne (Butler, 1898). Vári, 1986. Orachrysops ariadne (Butler, 1898). Pringle et al., 1994: 263. Orachrysops ariadne Butler, 1898. d’Abrera, 2009: 838. 1 Orachrysops ariadne. Male (Wingspan 35 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Wahroonga, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 10 March 2006. J.P. Brouard. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Type locality: [South Africa]: “Karkloof, Natal”. Distribution: South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal). Specific localities: KwaZulu-Natal – ‘The Start’, Karkloof (TL); near Michaelhouse (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Biologia 67/6: 1175—1185, 2012 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0109-7 How life history affects threat status: Requirements of two Onobrychis-feeding lycaenid butterflies, Polyommatus damon and Polyommatus thersites, in the Czech Republic Jana Šlancarová1,2,BarboraBednářová3,JiříBeneš2 &MartinKonvička1,2 1Department of Zoology, University of South Bohemia, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2Biology Centre, ASCR, v. v. i., Institute of Entomology, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic 3Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, CZ-71000 Ostrava, Czech Republic Abstract: Comparisons of related species differing in conservation status may offer insights into causes of species declines. We studied egg-laying patterns and landscape occupancy of two sympatric lycaenidae butterflies inhabiting xeric grasslands, vulnerable Polyommatus thersites and critically endangered Polyommatus [Agrodiaetus] damon, both developing on sainfoin, Onobrychis spp. Females of bivoltine P. thersites oviposit on host plant leaves at a relatively low height (≈20 cm), in both spring (May–June) and summer (July–August) generations. Females of univoltine P. damon (July–September) oviposit to senescing inflorescences, in significantly higher heights (>30 cm), and the species is hence vulnerable to summer mowing or grazing. On a landscape scale, both species tended to occur at sites with diverse sward management, including temporarily unmanaged patches. In addition, P. damon occurred only in the proximity of other
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01288-2 - The Management of Insects in Recreation and Tourism Edited by Raynald Harvey and Lemelin Excerpt More information 1 Introduction RAYNALD HARVEY LEMELIN The recreational dimensions of insects have been described in entomological texts, edited volumes (see Grzimek’s Animal Life Encyclopedia: Insects by Hutchins (2003)), cultural entomology (Chevancy et al. 2004; Hogue 1987), and various books such as Berenbaum’s (1995) Bugs in the System, Kritsky and Cherry’s (2000) Insect Mythology and Mitchell and Lasswell’s (2005) A Dazzle of Dragonflies. More recently, social scientists like Preston (2006) and Sleigh (2003) have examined human–insect encounters by focusing on specific insect species, while Brown’s (2006) Insect Poetics, Motte-Florace and Thomas’ (2003) cultural study of insects, Parikka’s (2010) examination of technology and ani- mals, Raffles’ (2010) anthropological study, and Rodger’s (2008) exam- ination of social theory and social insects have examined human–insect interactions from various disciplinary perspectives. This book is an attempt to build on these works by incorporating dimensions of leis- ure and tourism in human–insect interactions from an interdisciplin- ary perspective, as this topic is sorely lacking in leisure and tourism research (Fennell 2012). While the link between insects and leisure may at first glance appear to be dubious, these links, as Klein (2007) explains, are deeply embedded within the socio-economic fabric of human history, for we have domesticated insects, exploited their products (e.g., silk, bees- wax, honey, cochineal, lacquer), and deliberately introduced them in biocontrol measures for agriculture. These contributions were esti- mated at US $57 billion annually (Losey and Vaughan 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Riddle of the Sphinx: Population Ecology of the Endangered Blackburnʻs Sphinx Moth, Manduca Blackburni (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) on an Invasive Host Plant
    The Riddle of the Sphinx: Population Ecology of the Endangered Blackburnʻs Sphinx Moth, Manduca blackburni (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) on an Invasive Host Plant. A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENTOMOLOGY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) DECEMBER 2019 By: Christine H. Elliott Thesis Committee: Dr. Daniel Rubinoff, Committee Chair Dr. William Haines Dr. Mark Wright Keywords: Blackburn’s sphinx moth, Manduca blackburni, relative abundance, ecological life table, oviposition DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family: my two beautiful boys, Jacob and Phineas; my loving and supportive husband, Tim; and my Spartan mother, Barbara. Without your encouragement and support this could never have happened. I love you, I love you, I just love you! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was completed with tremendous support and assistance from my committee. Three years ago, Dr. Daniel Rubinoff was willing to take a risk and hire me. I will never be able to accurately convey my gratitude for this opportunity. Additionally, his clarity of thought and purpose was a trenchant force in keeping this work focused and on track. I also have tremendous appreciation for the vast knowledge and gentle expertise of Dr. William Haines. His generosity in time, editing, and advice was critical to my research and this thesis. Last but not least, Dr. Mark Wright was an invaluable sounding board and resource throughout my time, for which I am deeply grateful. His statistical guidance prevented my work from going off the rails and his eloquence under pressure has enriched my idiolect.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Invasive Plants on Animal Diversity in South Africa: a Synthesis
    Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation ISSN: (Online) 2311-9284, (Print) 0006-8241 Page 1 of 12 Original Research Impacts of invasive plants on animal diversity in South Africa: A synthesis Authors: Background: Increasing numbers of invasive alien plant (IAP) species are establishing around 1 Susana Clusella-Trullas the globe and can have negative effects on resident animal species function and diversity. Raquel A. Garcia1 These impacts depend on a variety of factors, including the extent of invasion, the region and Affiliations: the taxonomic group affected. These context dependencies make extrapolations of IAP impacts 1Centre for Invasion Biology, on resident biota from region to region a substantial challenge. Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch Objectives: Here, we synthesised data from studies that have examined the effects of IAPs on University, South Africa animal diversity in South Africa. Our focus is on ectothermic organisms (reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates). Corresponding author: Susana Clusella-Trullas, Method: We sourced relevant articles using keywords relating to (1) the effects of IAPs on [email protected] species diversity (abundance, richness and composition), (2) the IAP and (3) the native ectotherm. We extracted the taxonomic and spatial coverage of IAPs and affected native species Dates: Received: 01 Sep. 2016 and assessed the extent of information given on potential mechanisms driving IAP impacts. Accepted: 25 Nov. 2016 Results: Across the 42 studies, IAPs had a decreasing or neutral effect on native animal Published: 31 Mar. 2017 abundance and richness and significantly changed species composition. This review How to cite this article: highlighted the paucity of studies and the research deficits in taxonomic and geographic Clusella-Trullas, S.
    [Show full text]