Flight Safety Digest July-August 1996

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flight Safety Digest July-August 1996 FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION JULY–AUGUST 1996 FLIGHT SAFETY DIGEST SPECIAL DOUBLE ISSUE Dubrovnik-bound Flight Crew’s Improperly Flown Nonprecision Instrument Approach Results in Controlled-flight-into-terrain Accident Report Special CFIT Safety FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION For Everyone Concerned Flight Safety Digest With the Safety of Flight Vol. 15 No. 7/8 July–August 1996 Officers/Staff In This Issue Stuart Matthews Dubrovnik-bound Flight Crew’s Chairman, President and CEO Improperly Flown Nonprecision 1 Board of Governors Instrument Approach Results in James S. Waugh Treasurer Controlled-flight-into-terrain Accident Robert Reed Gray, Esq. An analysis of the terrain profile, accident General Counsel and Secretary aircraft configuration and flight profile Board of Governors determined that the accident aircraft’s ground- proximity warning system would not have ADMINISTRATIVE provided a warning to the crew, the official U.S. Nancy Richards Air Force report said. Executive Secretary FINANCIAL FSF CFIT Checklist 26 Brigette Adkins Accountant Worldwide Commercial Jet Transport 30 TECHNICAL Accident Rates Declined in 1995 Robert H. Vandel There were nine fatal accidents in 1995 Director of Technical Projects compared with 14 in 1994, and the fatal-accident Ellen Plaugher rate was lower than in all but two years since Secretary 1960. MEMBERSHIP FAA Advisory Circular Outlines Ahlam Wahdan New Method for Designing Airport 34 Assistant to the Director of Membership and Development Pavement for Boeing 777 Book offers a new look at procedures for PUBLICATIONS avoiding midair collisions. Roger Rozelle Director of Publications MD-87 Crew Makes Mistaken Approach Girard Steichen To Military Airport 44 Assistant Director of Publications Rick Darby Sightseeing helicopter downed by fuel Senior Editor exhaustion at air show. C. Claire Smith Cover: Wreckage of aft fuselage and empennage at crash site of U.S. Air Editorial Consultant Force CT-43A (Boeing 737-200), Dubrovnik, Croatia, April 3, 1996. Photo: AP/Wide World Photos Karen K. Ehrlich Production Coordinator Flight Safety Foundation is an international membership organization Kathryn L. Ramage Librarian, dedicated to the continuous improvement of flight safety. Nonprofit Jerry Lederer Aviation Safety Library and independent, FSF was launched in 1945 in response to the aviation industry’s need for a neutral clearinghouse to disseminate objective safety information, and for a credible and knowledgeable body that would identify threats to safety, analyze the problems and recommend Jerome Lederer practical solutions to them. Since its beginning, the Foundation has President/Emeritus acted in the public interest to produce positive influence on aviation safety. Today, the Foundation provides leadership to more than 660 member organizations in 77 countries. Foreword In 1991, Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) launched an international campaign to reduce the number of controlled-flight-into- terrain (CFIT) accidents, which was expanded later to include approach-and-landing accidents. An FSF-led task force, in counsel with the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), was formed and set as its goal to reduce by 50 percent the number of CFIT accidents by 1998. The FSF CFIT Task Force, which in 1994 received an Aviation Week & Space Technology Aerospace Laurel award for its work, includes representatives from airlines, equipment manufacturers, airframe manufacturers, professional aviation organizations and other technical and research organizations (see page iii). CFIT accidents are the leading cause of commercial aviation fatalities. According to FSF CFIT Task Force statistics, CFIT and approach-and-landing accidents accounted for more than 80 percent of the fatalities in commercial transport accidents between 1979 and 1991. According to statistics compiled by McDonnell Douglas (see page 30), there were four commercial jet transport CFIT accidents in 1995. Approach-and-landing accidents in 1995 continued to be prominent among commercial jet transport accidents, with 20 such accidents worldwide. As part of the overall CFIT-reduction plan, the FSF CFIT Task Force has developed several products including: • An “FSF CFIT Safety Alert” distributed to thousands of operators worldwide at no cost to recipients that emphasized the importance of immediate and aggressive “pull-up” actions, unless circumstances (visual meteorological conditions and flight well-above flat terrain, for example) explicitly determined that a ground-proximity warning system (GPWS) warning was false. Early FSF CFIT Task Force findings had determined that flight crews in CFIT accidents often ignored GPWS warnings; delayed recommended pull-up procedures while trying to evaluate the accuracy of the GPWS warning; or failed to respond with sufficient aggressive pull-up action. • An “FSF CFIT Checklist,” which helps pilots assess CFIT risks for specific flights and operations. To date, more than 30,000 copies of the FSF CFIT Checklist (reproduced following page 25) have been distributed by the Foundation worldwide with the help of sponsorships from FlightSafety International, Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS) and SimuFlite Training International at no cost to the recipients. The English version remains available at no charge. Additional sponsorships are being sought to distribute Chinese, Russian, French, Spanish and Arabic versions of the CFIT Checklist, which were translated by ICAO. • A video training aid, CFIT: Awareness and Prevention, which examines several CFIT accidents and presents cockpit voice recorder (CVR) data and simulation to illustrate accident reduction strategies. More than 6,000 copies of the video were distributed worldwide in 1995 (4,500 at no cost, with major funding from Associated Aviation Underwriters (AAU), Gulfstream Aerospace and Jeppesen Sanderson). Copies of CFIT: Awareness and Prevention are available from the Foundation for US$30; and, • The CFIT Education and Training Aid, a two-volume training package developed under the auspices of the FSF CFIT Task Force and produced by the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. Scheduled for release in late 1996, the training aid examines a number of CFIT accidents and focuses on human factors and management issues. The comprehensive training aid, which contains data to design simulator escape-maneuver training, is intended to be a resource for developing policies, procedures and CFIT-avoidance standards. The training aid also includes the video Controlled Flight into Terrain: An Encounter Avoided, which analyzes a jet transport CFIT accident in detail and shows how such accidents can be avoided. A price for the CFIT Education and Training Aid has not been determined, but it is designed to be an affordable training product for a wide range of aviation operators. FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION • FLIGHT SAFETY DIGEST • JULY–AUGUST 1996 i The FSF CFIT Task Force has also made eight recommendations to ICAO. A recommendation to broaden requirements for the use of GPWSs has been adopted by ICAO, and the others are under review. The new GPWS standards, effective Dec. 31, 1998, require GPWS in all aircraft used in “international commercial and general aviation operations, where the MCTM [maximum certified takeoff mass] is in excess of 5,700 kilograms [12,500 pounds] ... or that are authorized to carry more than nine passengers.” ICAO officials have indicated their support for the pending recommendations, which include: • A call for color-shaded depictions of terrain altitude on instrument-approach charts; • A warning against the use of three-pointer and drum-pointer altimeters; • A recommendation that all countries adopt the use of hectopascals for altimeter settings; • A call for the replacement of early-model GPWS equipment; • A recommendation for the improved design and presentation of nonprecision instrument approach procedures with a standard three-degree approach slope, except where prohibited by obstacles; • A call for the use of automated altitude call-outs; and, • A recognition of the important CFIT-avoidance benefits provided by the global positioning system/global navigation satellite system (GPS/GNSS). CFIT accidents involving commercial operators were examined in detail in a special April–May 1996 double issue of the Flight Safety Digest. The research focused on 156 CFIT accidents that occurred from 1988 through 1994. The report, “An Analysis of Controlled-flight-into-terrain (CFIT) Accidents of Commercial Operators, 1988 through 1994,” concluded that 75 percent of the 108 accident aircraft (for which data were available) were not equipped with a GPWS and that landing (descent)-phase and landing (approach)-phase accidents together accounted for nearly 70 percent of all CFIT accidents studied. The report also noted that nearly 60 percent of landing (approach)-phase accidents involved aircraft flying nonprecision approaches. Twenty- five percent of the approaches were very high frequency omnidirectional radio range (VOR) DME approaches. Another FSF report, prepared for the Directorate-General of Civil Aviation of the Netherlands and published in the March 1996 Flight Safety Digest, determined that there was a “five-fold increase in accident risk among commercial aircraft flying nonprecision approaches compared to those flying precision approaches.” The report, “Airport Safety: A Study of Accidents and Available Approach-and-landing Aids,” said that the “chance for error by the crew is probably greater during a nonprecision
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Developement of Dubrovnik Airport, Konavle Municipality Non-Technical Summary
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPEMENT OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT, KONAVLE MUNICIPALITY NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Zagreb, May 2014. Developer: ZraĀna luka Dubrovnik ltd. Developer: ZRAýNA LUKA DUBROVNIK ltd. Dobrota 24 20 213 ýilipi Practitioners: DVOKUT ECRO ltd. Trnjanska 37, 10 000 Zagreb Title of the study: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPEMENT OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT, KONAVLE MUNICIPALITY NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Study Manager: Mario Pokrivaþ, mag. ing. traff. Director: Marta Brkiü, mag. ing. agr. 2 environmental impact assessment Developement of Dubrovnik airport, Konavle municipality non-technical summary CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 3 A.1. CURRENT STATE OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT ....................................................... 3 A.2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT........................................... 7 B. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT LOCATION ENVIRONMENT ........................................ 12 C. REVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT .................. 20 D PROPOSAL FOR THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ACCEPTABILITY ASSESSMENT .... 31 D.2. PROPOSAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROGRAMME WITH IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .............................................................. 38 DVOKUT ECRO d.o.o. 1 environmental impact assessment Developement of Dubrovnik airport, Konavle municipality
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Starvation, United Airlines, Inc., Mcdonnell-Douglas DC-8-61, N8082U, Portland, Oregon, December 28, 1978
    Fuel starvation, United Airlines, Inc., McDonnell-Douglas DC-8-61, N8082U, Portland, Oregon, December 28, 1978 Micro-summary: This McDonnell-Douglas DC-8-61 crashed from fuel starvation while a landing gear malfunction was being examined. Event Date: 1978-12-28 at 1815 PST Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow. Aircraft Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Doc NTSB BA Issue 7 Doc Lssue 7
    Doc NTSB BA 81 08 Issue 7 I Doc NTSB BA 81 08 lssue 7 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-BA-81-8 I PB81-911408 4. Title and Subtitle 5.Report Date Aircraft Accident Reports - Brief Fonnat June 22, 1981 U.S. Civil Aviation 6.Performing Organization Issue Number 7 - 1980 Accidents Code 7. Author(s) ~.Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. Bureau of Teclmology 3278 National Transportation Safety Board 11 .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 298 U.S. General Aviation Accidents Occurring in 1980 in Brief Fonnat NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15.Supplementary Notes The subject report was distributed to NTSB mailing list: lB. 16.Abstract This publication contains selected aircraft accident reports, in brief fonnat, occurring in U.S. civil aviation operations during calendar year 1980. The 298 General Aviation accidents contained in this publication represent a rand.Qm selection. This publication is issued irregularly, nonnally fifteen times each year. The brief fonnat presents the facts, conditions, circtnnStances, and probable cause(s) for each accident. Additional statistical infonnation is tabulated by injury index, injuries, and causal factors. File Ntmlbers: 3-1801 thru 3-1956 3-1958 thru 3-2074 3-2076 thru 3-2100 17.Key Words (Aviation accident, Statistical Analysis) 1~.Distribution Statement (Civil aviation, Aviation accidents), probable This document is available to cause, pilot certificate, injuries, type of accident, the public through the National phase of operation, kind of flying, aircraft damage, Technical Information Service­ conditions of light.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (Sample Document)
    THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (sample document) by 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Disclaimer Methodology and Assumptions Summary of Findings : Duty-Free Summary of Findings : Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary of Findings : Food & Beverage Summary Tables: Duty-Free Summary Tables: Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary Tables: Food & Beverage Airport Profiles : Argentina – Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 Airport Profiles : Australia – Sydney Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Melbourne Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Selected Australian Airports Airport Profiles : Austria – Vienna International Airport Airport Profiles : Bahrain – Bahrain International Airport Airport Profiles : Belgium – Brussels Airport Airport Profiles : Bulgaria – Sofia Airport Airport Profiles : Canada – Airports of Canada Airport Profiles : Canada – Ottawa International Airport The Airport Commercial Sales Benchmarking Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Airport Profiles : Canada – Toronto Pearson International Airport Airport Profiles : Chile – Arturo Benitez International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Beijing Capital International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shanghai Airports Airport Profiles : Costa Rica – Airports of Costa Rica Airport Profiles : Croatia – Dubrovnik Airport Airport Profiles : Croatia – Franjo Tuđman Airport Zagreb Airport Profiles : Czech Republic - Václav Havel Airport Prague Airport Profiles
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Development
    Page 1 of 12 25 July 2010 No. 885 DEV Published biweekly – available by annual subscription only – www.mombergerairport.info Editorial office / Subscriptions; Phone: +1 519 833 4642, e-mail: [email protected] Managing Editor / Publisher: Martin Lamprecht [email protected] News Editor: Paul Ellis [email protected] – Founding Editor: Manfred Momberger Copyright © 2010 – Momberger Airport Information by Air Trans Source Inc. – published since 1973 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT (Southern Europe) ITALY Fondi Italiani per le Infrastrutture SGR SpA (F2i) has initiated discussions with Ferrovial SA regarding acquiring a controlling stake in GE.S.A.C. S.p.A., the operator of Naples- Capodichino Airport (#883.OPS1). Reuters reported that F2i’s Board has asked CEO Vito Gamberale to discuss the airport deal, valued at EUR 150 to 200 million, with Ferrovial. The Spanish company holds a 65% stake in Capodichino Airport through BAA Airports Ltd. It intends to sell non-core assets such as Naples Airport to repay its massive debt, reported to be GBP 1.54 billion. “There are various interested parties in the airport and we are studying their proposals,” a source close to BAA’s parent company Ferrovial said. #885.1 Officials at Bologna Airport have begun a call of bids for the remodelling of the passenger terminal. An announcement was made in the European Union’s official gazette in order to determine which company will care for hub requalification, construction supervision, and security co-ordination during the project’s execution phase. A starting amount of EUR 21.5 million was mentioned. Work must be completed within 720 days from the assigned date.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XV
    Aviation Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XV. Issue 02, January 20, 2019 Hello all, To subscribe send an email to: [email protected] In this weeks edition of Aviation Human Factors Industry News you will read the following stories: ★37 years ago: The horror and ★Florida man decapitated in freak heroism of Air Florida Flight 90 helicopter accident identified, authorities say ★Crash: Saha B703 at Fath on Jan at14th Bedford 2019, landed a few atyears wrong ago airport was a perfect★Mechanic's example of error professionals blamed for 2017 who had drifted over years into a very unsafeGerman operation. helicopter This crash crew in Mali ★ACCIDENT CASE STUDY BLIND wasOVER literally BAKERSFIELD an “accident waiting to happen”★11 Aviation and never Quotes through That Coulda conscious decision. This very same processSave fooledYour Life a very smart bunch of★Aviation engineers Safety and managersNetwork at NASA and brought down two US space shuttles!Publishes This 2018 process Accident is builtStatistics into our human★Australian software. Safety Authority Seeks Proposal On Fatigue Rules ★ACCIDENT CASE STUDY BLIND OVER BAKERSFIELD Human Factors Industry News 1 37 years ago: The horror and heroism of Air Florida Flight 90 A U.S. Park Police helicopter pulls two people from the wreckage of an Air Florida jetliner that crashed into the Potomac River when it hit a bridge after taking off from National Airport in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 13, 1982. On last Sunday, the nation's capital was pummeled with up to 8 inches of snow, the first significant winter storm in Washington in more than three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobember 1996 Alerts
    General Aviation Airworthiness Alerts AC No. 43-16 A LER TS ALERT NO. 220 NOVEMBER 1996 Improve Reliability- Interchange Service Experience CONTENTS AIRCRAFT ALON ..................................................................................................................................... 1 BEECH ................................................................................................................................... 1 BOEING ................................................................................................................................. 4 CESSNA ................................................................................................................................. 4 FAIRCHILD ........................................................................................................................... 7 LAKE ...................................................................................................................................... 7 PIPER .................................................................................................................................... 7 STINSON ............................................................................................................................. 10 WSK PZL MIELEC ............................................................................................................. 10 HELICOPTERS AGUSTA ............................................................................................................................... 10 AMERICAN
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycling the Islands of Dalmatia Plus! the South Coast
    Overview Selected Tour Start Date: Sunday, September 19th, 2021 Bicycle Tours in Croatia: Bicycling the Islands of Dalmatia Plus! the South Coast OVERVIEW Croatia's Dalmatian Coast has been a favorite seaside destination among central Europeans for over a century. Join us as we explore this spectacular limestone coastline by bicycle! We begin near Split where you'll see Diocletian's 3rd century palace still inhabited by descendants of the Romans who settled this area and where we'll visit the waterfalls of Krka National Park. On our ride we pedal three of the Mediterranean's most picturesque islands -Brač, Hvar and Korčula - spending time in the picturesque rural areas, ports, and fishing villages. We'll explore the Medieval and Renaissance cities that were so important to the Greeks, Romans, Venetians, Austrians, Hungarians, and Croats. We'll also pedal to the remote interior of coastal Croatia before shuttling you to the beautiful walled city of Dubrovnik, long considered the jewel of the Adriatic. ***If this sounds great but you'd like a shorter tour, check out our Bicycling the Islands of the Dalmatian Coast tour, which features the first 8 days of this tour.*** HIGHLIGHTS The Dalmatian Coast, Krka National Park, Islands of Brač, Hvar and Korčula, Medieval and Renaissance towns and villages of Primosten, Trogir, Split, Škrip, Pučišća, Stari Grad, Hvar, Korčula, Ston, Mali Ston and Dubrovnik TOUR FACTS Classic: Learn more about our Classic tours at https://www.experienceplus.com/tours/bike-tour- Tour Style styles/classic-tours 12 days, 11 nights accommodation, meals as noted in itinerary, 1 wine tasting, pick up from Split, Includes shuttle to Dubrovnik, guided visit of Diocletian's palace and Hvar Town; and the usual (see below) Countries Croatia Begin/End Skradin or Trogir / Mali Ston or Dubrovnik Arrive/Depart Airport Split (SPU) / Dubrovnik Airport (DBV) Total Distance 427 km (265 miles) Avg.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Federal Regulations GPO Access
    12±2±96 Monday Vol. 61 No. 232 December 2, 1996 Pages 63691±64006 Briefings on How To Use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC, and Austin, TX, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. Now Available Online Code of Federal Regulations via GPO Access (Selected Volumes) Free, easy, online access to selected Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) volumes is now available via GPO Access, a service of the United States Government Printing Office (GPO). CFR titles will be added to GPO Access incrementally throughout calendar years 1996 and 1997 until a complete set is available. GPO is taking steps so that the online and printed versions of the CFR will be released concurrently. The CFR and Federal Register on GPO Access, are the official online editions authorized by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register. To access CFR volumes via the World Wide Web, and to find out which volumes are available online at a given time users may go to: ★ http:www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr New titles and/or volumes will be added to this online service as they become available. The initial titles introduced include: ★ Title 20 (Parts 400±499)ÐEmployees' Benefits (Social Security Administration) ★ Title 21 (Complete)ÐFood and Drugs (Food and Drug Administration, Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of National Drug Control Policy) ★ Title 40 (Almost complete)ÐProtection of Environment (Environmental Protection Agency) For additional information on GPO Access products, services and access methods, see page II or contact the GPO Access User Support Team via: ★ Phone: toll-free: 1-888-293-6498 ★ Email: [email protected] federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • State and Airline Response to COVID-19. 04 May 2020 Airline Announcement Share Flights 2019 2/5/20 Aer Lingus See IAG
    State and Airline Response to COVID-19. 04 May 2020 Airline Announcement Share Flights 2019 2/5/20 Aer Lingus See IAG. Plan to cut workforce by 20% [1/5]. 0.8% -91% Air Dolomiti Suspended flights (18/3–17/5). Some repatriation flights [2/4]. 0.2% Air France Flight capacity cut by 90% from 23/3 until end May [10/4]. State aid granted with commitment to reduce CO2 3.2% -97% emissions of domestic flights by 50% by 2024 [24/4]. All A380 grounded [16/3]. A ‘best case’ could be 30% of 2019 during July, but social distancing challenges [20/4]. Progressive pax domestic flights restart from 11 May [26/4]. Air Malta Suspended flights from 25/3 (until further notice) with exceptions [18/3]. Will lay off 80% of pilots (21/4). 0.2% Air Moldova Suspended flights (25/3–15/5) [26/3]. 0.1% Air Serbia Suspended passenger transport (19/3–30/4 or later) (see Serbia). State aid granted [27/4] 0.3% airBaltic Suspended flights (17/3–12/5). Flight capacity reduced by 50% 15/4-30/10 [3/4] (see Latvia). Accelerated fleet 0.6% transformation (A220-only) [22/4]. Some pax flights may resume 13/5 [28/4] Alitalia Nationalised [17/3] to resume ops with ~80% of current fleet [23/4]. Reimbursement or exchange of tickets booked 1.9% -89% until 31 May proposed [20/3]. Cargo flights to/from China extended until 11/5 [30/4]. Austrian Airlines Suspended flights (19/3–31/5) [29/4]. Expects 25%-50% of demand for Summer (vs S19).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Value Chain and Manufacturing Competitiveness Analysis for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Technologies FCH Contract 192
    Study on Value Chain and Manufacturing Competitiveness Analysis for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Technologies FCH contract 192 Evidence Report E4tech (UK) Ltd for FCH 2 JU in partnership with Ecorys and Strategic Analysis Inc. September 2019 Incorporated in England and Wales E4tech (UK) Ltd 83 Victoria Street Company no. 4142898 London SW1H 0HW Registered address: United Kingdom 133-137 Alexandra Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 7JY Tel: +44 20 3008 6140 United Kingdom Fax: +44 20 7078 6180 www.e4tech.com This report was prepared for the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking. Copies of this document can be downloaded from fch.europa.eu The report and supporting study was undertaken by E4tech for FCH 2 JU in partnership with Ecorys and Strategic Analysis Inc. The research underpinning the study was undertaken between January to October 2018 ©FCH 2 JU, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided that the source is acknowledged. “The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the FCH 2 JU. The FCH 2 JU does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the FCH 2 JU nor any person acting on the FCH 2 JU’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.” Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.1 This ‘Evidence’ report ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aerosafety World May 2011
    AeroSafety WORLD AN INDEPENDENT LOOK NTSB researches TCAS advisories NONREVENUE FLIGHT SAFETY The risks of nonroutine operations PROMOTING PROFESSIONALISM Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar ELECTRONIC RUNWAY SWEEPING FOD detectors guard the surface FATAL PERSISTENCE BAD DECISIONS DOOM FLIGHT THE JOURNAL OF FLIGHT SAFEty FOUNDATION MAY 2011 Aviation Department TOOL KIT UPDATE An operations and safety management resource for corporate/business aviation department managers and staff Aviation Department Resources Operator’s Flight Safety Handbook Includes adaptable templates for operations, safety Guidelines for the creation and operation of a and emergency response manuals; guidelines for flight safety function within an operator’s organization duty and rest scheduling; and an extensive library of Turbofan Engine Malfunction publications on corporate/business aviation safety Recognition and Response Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction A video presentation of essential powerplant (ALAR) Tool Kit Update information for pilots transitioning to, or already A multimedia resource for preventing approach- flying, jets and-landing accidents, including those involving Turbopropeller Engine Malfunction controlled flight into terrain Recognition and Response Waterproof Flight Operations A video presentation of essential powerplant A comprehensive guide for reducing the risks in information for pilots transitioning to, or already overwater operations flying, turboprop US$750 FSF members/$1,500 nonmembers Order online at <flightsafety.org> or contact Namratha Apparao, tel. +1 703.739.6700, ext. 101; email: [email protected] EXECUTIVE’SMESSAGE Coaches ight now, a lot of attention is being focused management system, training program, incen- on issues like intentional noncompliance tive program or even threat. and the lack of professionalism. Some of Perhaps what we are seeing now is a break- the biggest and most powerful regulators down of that system.
    [Show full text]