DOCSLIB.ORG

Core 1..72 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core 1..72 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50) CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 122 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 23, 2005 Part A Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7687 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, June 23, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Some hon. members: No. *** Prayers PETITIONS MARRIAGE Mr. James Lunney (Nanaimo—Alberni, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS have a series of petitions dealing with different subjects. The first three deal with the subject of marriage, a matter that is of great Ï (1000) concern to constituents in my riding. The petitions come from [Translation] Nanaimo and other areas in British Columbia, such as Lantzville, Parksville and Qualicum. ORDER IN COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS Hon. Dominic LeBlanc (Parliamentary Secretary to the The petitioners are calling on Parliament to recognize that Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): marriage is the best foundation for families and the raising of Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, a children, that the institution of marriage as between a man and a number of orders in council made recently by the government. woman is being challenged, and that the House passed a motion in June 1999 that called for marriage to continue to be recognized as *** the union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others. Ï (1005) They are calling on Parliament to ensure that marriage remains an [English] institution between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS others. Hon. Dominic LeBlanc (Parliamentary Secretary to the Ï (1010) Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 20 Mr. James Lunney (Nanaimo—Alberni, CPC): Mr. Speaker, petitions. the second series of petitions contain 2,500 signatures from people across the country who are concerned about Bill C-420. Most of the *** petitions are from British Columbia but there are others from Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Quebec on the subject of Bill COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE C-420, the motion by the hon. member for Oshawa that was just TRANSPORT denied. Hon. Roger Gallaway (Sarnia—Lambton, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I Bill C-420 refers to natural health products and the way in which have the honour to present, in both official languages, the fifth report we regulate them. The petitioners call on the government to ensure of the Standing Committee on Transport. that natural health products are regulated as food and not drugs and HEALTH remain available as low cost and low risk options for Canadians to protect their own health. Mr. Colin Carrie (Oshawa, CPC): Mr. Speaker, there have been discussions among all parties and I believe you will find unanimous AUTISM consent for the following. I move that Report No. 13 of the Standing Mr. James Lunney (Nanaimo—Alberni, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I Committee on Health, presented in the House on Wednesday, June 1, have another petition containing about 30 signatures of petitioners 2005 requesting an extension of 30 sitting days to consider Bill who are concerned with helping people with autism spectrum C-420, be concurred in. disorder. The Speaker: Does the hon. member for Oshawa have the unanimous consent of the House to propose the motion? The petitioners are calling for support for applied behaviour analysis and for intensive behavioural intervention to help parents Some hon. members: Agreed. dealing with children with the very severe disability of autism. 7688 COMMONS DEBATES June 23, 2005 S. O. 57 MARRIAGE COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Mr. David Anderson (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC): Mr. Speaker, it is my privilege today to present two petitions. The first PUBLIC ACCOUNTS petition deals with an issue that has been brought many times before Mr. John Williams (Edmonton—St. Albert, CPC): Mr. Speak- the House and that is the issue of marriage. er, I have the honour to present the 18th report of the Standing The petitioners are calling on Parliament to pass legislation to Committee on Public Accounts concerning Chapter 2, National recognize the institution of marriage as being the union of one man Security in Canada, The 2001 Anti-terrorism Initiative: Air and one woman to the exclusion of all others. Transportation Security, Marine Security, and Emergency Prepared- ness, of the April 2005 report of the Auditor General of Canada. In CANADA POST accordance with Standing Order 109, your committee requests a Mr. David Anderson (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC): Mr. government response within 120 days. Speaker, I have another series of petitions on an issue that is very important to many of the people in small towns in my riding and that *** is the issue of post offices and their desire to keep their local post office open. Ï (1015) The petitioners want to point out that Canada Post has closed a EXTENSION OF SITTING PERIOD number of rural post offices already where it does not consider a community with less than 700 points of call to be a viable location, MOTION THAT DEBATE BE NOT FURTHER ADJOURNED and whereas the closure of those post offices would hurt the communities, they are calling on Parliament to keep the post offices Hon. Tony Valeri (Leader of the Government in the House of open and to retain a moratorium on post office closures. Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, with regard to Government Business [Translation] No. 17, I move: IMMIGRATION That the debate be not further adjourned. Mrs. Carole Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ): Mr. The Speaker: Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, there will now be Speaker, I am very pleased to present a petition signed by dozens of a 30 minute question period. Perhaps those hon. members who wish individuals, in addition to the hundreds of other signatories of the to ask questions could rise in their places so the Chair has some idea petition I presented last week. of how many there will be. This petition is asking the Minister of Citizenship and Immigra- tion to use his discretionary power to give permanent resident status I think we will limit questions to about a minute or a minute and a to Mr. Sergio Orestes Loreto Garcia on humanitarian and half and then get an answer and go back to the next question. The compassionate grounds. answers of course will be about a minute long as well, so I think that will ensure as equitable a distribution as I can get in 30 minutes. This would allow Mr. Loreto to leave his sanctuary in Toronto and return to his family in Saint-Hubert. We will start the 30 minutes with the hon. member for Prince CORRECTIONAL SERVICE OF CANADA George—Peace River. Mr. Robert Vincent (Shefford, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr. Speaker, to present this petition on behalf of Canadian corrections officers. It my question will not take a minute. It is pretty straightforward. I has been signed by over 2,000 individuals. would ask the government House leader how he defends using *** closure to ram through his agenda in the dying days of this session, to extend the session for two pieces of legislation that ultimately will QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER not come into effect for quite some time. Hon. Dominic LeBlanc (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Bill C-48, as I explained at length yesterday, will not effectively Mr. Speaker, I ask that all questions be allowed to stand. be in force for at least a year until we see what level of so-called Liberal surplus we have, which, as I explained, Conservatives The Speaker: Is it agreed? believe to be overtaxation. Some hon. members: Agreed. Bill C-38 will ultimately be sitting in the Senate all summer. Why [English] would the government force closure to ram through these two pieces Mr. John Williams: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I think of legislation when it is not going to make any consequential you will find there is unanimous consent to return to presenting difference? reports from committees. The Speaker: Is that agreed? Hon. Tony Valeri: Mr. Speaker, first I would like to say that what I am doing is ensuring that Parliament has an opportunity to entertain Some hon. members: Agreed. questions and to make a decision on two pieces of legislation. June 23, 2005 COMMONS DEBATES 7689 S. O. 57 The second point I would make is that it would be ultimately up to At the end of the day, I think what Parliament needs to do is not this Parliament to decide whether to accept this motion. We are in a only debate issues but also have the opportunity to decide on a minority Parliament. It is not the government that will alone be able question. That in fact is what we have done. We have given the to see the success of this motion, so it will be up to parliamentarians House the opportunity to decide on a question. Parliament will in the House to decide whether the extension of this sitting in order decide. to deal with both the budget bill and Bill C-38 is in fact required and Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Calgary East, CPC): Mr. Speaker, we whether parliamentarians are willing to do that.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..104 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 116 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 11, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7131 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 11, 2003 The House met at 2 p.m. challenged clients received a donation from Sun Country Cable, a donation that will enable the centre to continue its work in our Prayers community. Sun Country Cable donated the building. This building is next to Kindale's existing facility and both properties will eventually lead to construction of a new centre. In the meantime, the Ï (1405) building will be used for training and respite suites. [English] I am proud to be part of a community that looks out for those less The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesday we will now sing fortunate. Charity does begin at home. O Canada, and we will be led by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre. *** [Editor's Note: Members sang the national anthem] [Translation] SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-CANADA STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I would like to share some of my concerns about the recent decision [English] by Société Radio-Canada to cancel its late evening sports news. CHABAD Hon. Art Eggleton (York Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise to I am worried, because last year this crown corporation had also decided to stop broadcasting the Saturday night hockey games, La pay tribute to Chabad Lubavitch which is the world's largest network Soirée du hockey.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction
    The Liberals: A House Divided Introduction “I will fulfill my mandate and focus entirely on governing from now until February Focus 2004. At which time my work will be done and at which time my successor will be In an unprec- chosen. And then, at the age of 70, I will look back with great satisfaction as I take edented move against a sitting my rest with Aline, secure in the knowledge that the future of Canada is unlim- Canadian prime ited.” — Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, August 21, 2002 minister, a signifi- cant number of Struggle for Power media and political organizers, the buzz Liberal Party mem- The summer of 2002 will be remem- about his future grew louder and louder. bers appeared The Martin camp was particularly ready to vote bered for both the hot weather and the against Jean equally hot political battle waged within active in promoting their man for the Chrétien in a the ranks of the Liberal Party of next leadership campaign. They built a planned leadership Canada. Open political warfare raged powerful organization and raised sub- review next year. inside the heart of Canada’s most stantial funds. Incensed by this pressure The split in the to leave, Chrétien and Martin had a Liberal camp was successful political machine. A party highlighted this that traditionally rallied around its falling out, and Martin left cabinet. spring when Paul leader appeared ready to tear itself apart Liberals were increasingly divided Martin, one of the over the question of leadership. and feared an open battle at a planned main contenders to After the Liberal victory of 2000, convention to review Chrétien’s leader- replace the PM, attention was drawn to the question of ship in February 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • BAD MEDICINE: Trade Treaties, Privatization and Health Care Reform in Canada 3 Contents
    TradeTrade treaties,treaties, privatization privatization andand healthhealth carecare reformreform inin CanadaCanada Jim Grieshaber-Otto and Scott Sinclair Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Trade treaties, privatization and health care reform in Canada Jim Grieshaber-Otto and Scott Sinclair 2004 2 CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY ALTERNATIVES Copyright © 2004 Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or the author. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Grieshaber-Otto, Jim Bad medicine : trade treaties, privatization and health care reform in Canada / Jim Grieshaber-Otto and Scott Sinclair. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88627-402-8 1. Health care reform—Canada. 2. Canada—Commercial treaties— Social aspects. 3. Medical policy—Canada. 4. Privatization—Canada. 5. Health planning—Canada. I. Sinclair, Scott II. Title. RA412.5.C3G75 2004 362.1’0971 C2004-903350-6 cover design by Studio 2 ([email protected]) text layout & design by Dirk Van Stralen Printed and bound in Canada Published by Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Suite 410, 75 Albert Street Ottawa, ON K1P 5E7 Tel 613-563-1341 Fax 613-233-1458 http://www.policyalternatives.ca [email protected] CAW 567 OTTAWA BAD MEDICINE: Trade treaties, privatization and health care reform
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..186 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 18, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 3683 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 18, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. (a) the motion shall again be considered on a day designated by the Government after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the tenth sitting day after the interruption; Prayers (b) debate on the motion shall be resumed at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on the day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section and shall not be further interrupted or adjourned; and (c) when no Member rises to speak or after three hours of debate, whichever is GOVERNMENT ORDERS earlier, the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the motion, provided that, if a recorded division is requested on the motion considered on a (1000) Ï day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Standing Order, it shall stand [English] deferred to an appointed time on the next Wednesday, no later than the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on that day. STANDING ORDERS (3) Not more than one motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing or Hon. Anne McLellan (for the Leader of the Government in the special committee may be moved on any sitting day.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations Adam M. Dodek*
    Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations Adam M. Dodek Over the past decade, the use of au cOurs de la dernière décennie, le omnibus bills has become routine in the recours à des projets de lois omnibus Parliament of Canada. Omnibus budget est devenu une sorte de routine au sein implementation bills have grown in size du Parlement du Canada. Les projets to several hundred pages and acquired de lois omnibus d’exécution du budget their own political term with a decid- n’ont cessé de voir leur nombre de pages edly negative connotation: “omnibudget grossir au point d’atteindre plusieurs bills”. These omnibus and omnibudget centaines et on a même fini par les qua- bills have been a source of controversy lifier, avec toute la connotation politique and, at times, political protest. In its 2015 négative que cela suppose, de « projets 2017 CanLIIDocs 131 election platform, the Liberal Party of de lois omnibudget ». Ces projets de Canada promised to change the House lois omnibus et projets de lois omni- of Commons’ Standing Orders to end budget ont fait l’objet de controverses, the “undemocratic practice” of using voire parfois, de protestations politiques. omnibus bills. This article analyses Dans son programme électoral de 2015, the understanding, use, and history of le Parti libéral du Canada promettait de omnibus bills in the Parliament of Can- modifier le Règlement de la Chambre ada. It argues that such bills undermine des communes dans le but de mettre fin parliamentarians’ ability to responsibly à cette « pratique antidémocratique » and effectively carry out their duties to que représente le recours à des projets examine and debate legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Allocation in the House of Commons T
    Silencing Parliamentary Democracy or Effective Time Management? Time Allocation in the House of Commons by Yves Yvon J. Pelletier 2000 CanLIIDocs 228 Is "time allocation" the best means by which to silence the opposition or does it allow rather for effective time management in the House of Commons? In 1969, the Trudeau government adopted, not without a vigorous reaction from opposition parties, a new procedure that allotted a certain period of time for a debate, reducing the use of closure. Despite promises that this measure would never be used, 150 time allocation motions were adopted by the House of Commons since December 1971. This article analyses the context in which time allocation was adopted and determines which government has used it most often. he centralization of political powers in the hands of of time could be allocated for debate. The partisan Tsenior management within the office of the Prime position when this measure was adopted did not prevent Minister and the central agencies of the federal its use by all federal govemments since 1971, on 163 government cannot alone account for the reduction in the occasions. This article examines the decline of the legislative role of Canadian Parliamentarians. In fact, legislative role of MPs as the result of time allocation and changes to the Standing Orders of the House of determines which government, from Trudeau to Commons by its members over the years have limited the Chrétien, have made most frequent use of it in terms of opportunities of private members to influence the final the number of seats held by the government, sitting days wording of government bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..172 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)
    CANADA Débats de la Chambre des communes re e VOLUME 140 Ï NUMÉRO 103 Ï 1 SESSION Ï 38 LÉGISLATURE COMPTE RENDU OFFICIEL (HANSARD) Le vendredi 20 mai 2005 Présidence de l'honorable Peter Milliken TABLE DES MATIÈRES (La table des matières quotidienne des délibérations se trouve à la fin du présent numéro.) Toutes les publications parlementaires sont disponibles sur le réseau électronique « Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire » à l'adresse suivante : http://www.parl.gc.ca 6271 CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES Le vendredi 20 mai 2005 La séance est ouverte à 10 heures. développement économique du Canada pour les régions du Québec, plus fréquemment appelée Développement économique Canada. Les nombreux débats, ici, et avec les membres du Comité Prière permanent de l'industrie, des ressources naturelles, des sciences et de la technologie ont permis de modifier le texte de ce projet de loi, de le rendre plus clair et finalement de le bonifier. Après des mois de travail, nous avons maintenant entre les mains non seulement un AFFAIRES COURANTES meilleur projet de loi, davantage adapté à la situation et aux besoins du Québec d'aujourd'hui, mais surtout un projet de loi qui fait la Ï (1000) meilleure synthèse possible des vues des différents partis en cette [Traduction] Chambre. Je dis meilleure synthèse possible parce que, comme disait LES COMITÉS DE LA CHAMBRE Picasso, s'il n'existait qu'une seule vérité, on ne pourrait pas peindre des centaines de tableaux sur un même sujet. CITOYENNETÉ ET IMMIGRATION Je voudrais donc remercier bien chaleureusement tous ceux et L'hon. Karen Redman (Kitchener-Centre, Lib.): Monsieur le celles qui ont pris part à ce débat et qui l'ont enrichi de leurs points Président, des discussions ont eu lieu entre les partis au sujet du de vue respectifs.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, May 7, 1998
    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 101 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, May 7, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 6631 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, May 7, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. Committee on Procedure and House Affairs regarding the member- ship of the Standing Committee on Transport. _______________ If the House gives its consent, I intend to move concurrence in Prayers the 32nd report later this day. _______________ * * * [Translation] ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS ROYAL CANADIAN MINT ACT D (1000) Hon. Alfonso Gagliano (Minister of Public Works and Gov- [Translation] ernment Services, Lib.) moved for leave to introduce Bill C-41, an act to amend the Royal Canadian Mint Act and the Currency GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS Act. Mr. Peter Adams (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in * * * both official languages, the government’s response to two peti- tions. [English] * * * INDIAN ACT Mr. Jim Hart (Okanagan—Coquihalla, Ref.) moved for leave COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE to introduce Bill C-402, an act to amend the Indian Act (obligations ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT of landlords and tenants on reserve land). Mr. Guy St-Julien (Abitibi, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the He said: Mr. Speaker, I rise on behalf of the constituents of honour to present, in both official languages, the third report of the Okanagan—Coquihalla to introduce my private member’s bill Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Develop- entitled an act to amend the Indian Act, obligations of landlords ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Canada, Official Results of the 38Th General Election – PDF Format
    2 5 3 2 a CANDIDATES ELECTED / CANDIDATS ÉLUS Se 6 ln ln A nco co C Li in R L E ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED de ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED C er O T S M CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU C I bia C D um CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU É ol C A O N C t C A H Aler 35050 Mississauga South / Mississauga-Sud Paul John Mark Szabo N E !( e A N L T 35051 Mississauga--Streetsville Wajid Khan A S E 38th GENERAL ELECTION R B 38 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE C I NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR 35052 Nepean--Carleton Pierre Poilievre T A I S Q Phillip TERRE-NEUVE-ET-LABRADOR 35053 Newmarket--Aurora Belinda Stronach U H I s In June 28, 2004 E T L 28 juin, 2004 É 35054 Niagara Falls Hon. / L'hon. Rob Nicholson E - 10001 Avalon Hon. / L'hon. R. John Efford B E 35055 Niagara West--Glanbrook Dean Allison A N 10002 Bonavista--Exploits Scott Simms I Z Niagara-Ouest--Glanbrook E I L R N D 10003 Humber--St. Barbe--Baie Verte Hon. / L'hon. Gerry Byrne a 35056 Nickel Belt Raymond Bonin E A n L N 10004 Labrador Lawrence David O'Brien s 35057 Nipissing--Timiskaming Anthony Rota e N E l n e S A o d E 10005 Random--Burin--St. George's Bill Matthews E n u F D P n d ely E n Gre 35058 Northumberland--Quinte West Paul Macklin e t a s L S i U a R h A E XEL e RÉSULTATS OFFICIELS 10006 St.
    [Show full text]