DOCSLIB.ORG

00060659 Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
00060659 Project Document TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 3 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 5 PART 1A: CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographic and biodiversity context .......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Climate change context .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Socio-economic context .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Legislative, policy, and institutional context ............................................................................................ 12 PART 1B: BASELINE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 14 1.5 Threats to biodiversity and ecosystem services of the EGREE ................................................................. 14 1.6 Management of the CWLS ................................................................................................................... 16 1.7. Trajectory of production activities in the landscape surrounding the CWLS ...................................... 17 1.8. Desired long-term solution and barriers to achieving it...................................................................... 19 2. PROJECT STRATEGY ............................................................................................................... 22 2.1 Conformity with GEF Policy .................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Driven-ness ......................................................... 24 2.3 Project Goal, Objective, Outcomes and Outputs ...................................................................................... 25 Outcome 1: Sectoral planning in the EGREE mainstreams biodiversity conservation considerations ..................... 25 Outcome 2 Enhanced capacity of sector institutions for implementing biodiversity-friendly sector plans including monitoring and enforcement of regulations .................................................................................................................... 31 Outcome 3: Community livelihoods and natural resource use are sustainable in the EGREE ................................. 34 2.4 Key Indicators, Risks and Assumptions .................................................................................................... 36 2.5 Incremental Cost Assessment ................................................................................................................... 38 2.6 Cost-effectiveness ..................................................................................................................................... 40 2.7 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................................ 40 2.8 Replicability .............................................................................................................................................. 41 3. PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 43 4. TOTAL BUDGET AND WORKPLAN ...................................................................................... 49 5. MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS ....................................................................................... 54 5.1 Project Implementation Arrangements ..................................................................................................... 54 5.2 Coordination with related initiatives ........................................................................................................ 57 5.3 Audit arrangements .................................................................................................................................. 58 5.4 Use of institutional logos on project deliverables .................................................................................... 58 6. MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND EVALUATION ........................................................... 58 7. LEGAL CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................... 61 8. ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................................... 62 2 of 118 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APCZMA Andhra Pradesh Coastal Zone Management Authority APPCB Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board APFD Andhra Pradesh Forest Department APR Annual Project Review ATLAS UNDP’s Enterprise Resources Platform AWP Annual Work Plan BSAP Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan CB Conservation Biologist CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CDR Combined Delivery Report CO Country Office COS Communication and Outreach Specialist CP (UNDP) Country Programme CPAP (UNDP) Country Programme Action Plan CPCB Central Pollution Control Board CRZ Coastal Regulation Zone CSR Corporate Social Responsibility CTCT Community to Community Training CWLS Coringa Wildlife Sanctuary CZMP Coastal Zone Management Plan EB Executing Body EDC Eco-Development Committee EGREE East Godavari River Estuarine Ecosystem EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EPA Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 EqTAP Development of Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Technologies and their Integration for the Asia- Pacific Region FA Financial Assistant FAA Financial and Administrative Assistant FD Forest Department GB Governing Body GEF Global Environment Facility GF Godavari Foundation GoI Government of India Ha Hectares IBA Important Bird Area IC Incremental cost ICZM Integrated Coastal Zone Management IGCMP India GEF Coastal and Marine Programme IP Implementing Partner IR Inception Report IUCN World Conservation Union IW Inception Workshop JFM Joint Forest Management KMC Kakinada Municipal Corporation KSPL Kakinada Sea Port Limited LLPMU Landscape-Level Project Management Unit LPAC Local Project Appraisal Committee M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MMU Mangrove Mangement Unit MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forests MPEDA Marine Products Export Development Authority MSSRF M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation NaCSA National Centre for Sustainable Aquaculture NBAP National Biodiversity Action Plan NGO Non-government Organization 3 of 118 NPD National Project Director NPMU National Project Management Unit PA Project Associate PAs Protected Areas PCCF Principal Chief Conservator of Forests PCPIRs Petroleum, Chemicals and Petrochemical Investment Regions PIMS Project Information Management System PIR Project Implementation Review PC Project Coordinator PM Project Manager PPG Project Preparation Grant PRIs Panchayati Raj Institutions PSC Project Steering Committee RCU Regional Coordination Unit SADA Shore Area Development Authority SBAA Standard Basic Assistance Agreement SE Subject Expert SELS Socio-economic and Livelihoods Specialist SEZ Special Economic Zone SHG Self-Help Group SO-2 (GEF’s) Strategic Objective 2 (under the Biodiversity Focal Area) SPD State Project Director SPMU State Project Management Unit SPSC State Project Steering Committee SRF Strategic Results Framework TAG Technical Advisory Group TOR Terms of Reference TPR Tri-partite Review TTR Terminal Tri-partite Review UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNDP-CO United Nations Development Programme – Country Office UNDP-GEF United Nations Development Programme – Global Environment Facility Unit USD United States Dollar VLI Village Level Institutions VSS Van Samrakshana Samiti 4 of 118 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS Part 1A: Context 1.1 Geographic and biodiversity context 1. India has a coastline of about 7,500 kilometers of which the mainland accounts for 5,400 kilometers, the Lakshadweep Islands account for 132 kilometers, and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands for 1,900 kilometers. The coastline is endowed with a wide range of ecosystems such as mangroves, coral reefs, sea grasses, salt marshes, sand dunes, estuaries, lagoons and natural habitats. The abundant coastal and offshore marine ecosystems include about 6,740 square kilometers of mangroves, including part of the Sundarbans, the Bhitarkanika, the Pichavaram, and the Coringa, which are among the largest mangroves in the world. These habitats and ecosystems store and cycle nutrients, filter pollutants, protect shorelines from erosion and storms, play a vital role in regulating hydrological functions and modulating climate as they are a major carbon sink and oxygen source, and, in addition, sustain livelihoods of coastal communities. 2. The coastal region that is a focus of the proposed project, namely the East Godavari River Estuarine Ecosystem (EGREE), is located on the eastern side of the Indian peninsula, in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The long coastline of Andhra Pradesh stretches over 973.7 kilometers (12% of India’s total coastline), and covers 9 districts from Srikakulam to Nellore. A prominent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparison of the Water Quality Between the Mangrove Areas Mulyorejo and Wonorejo
    MATEC Web of Conferences 177, 01014 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817701014 ISOCEEN 2017 A comparison of the water quality between the mangrove areas Mulyorejo and Wonorejo Luc Kauhl1,3 , Kayleigh Lambregts1,3,* , and Suntoyo2 1Exchange student, Ocean Engineering Department, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, Indonesia (60111) 2Associate Professor, Ocean Engineering Department, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, Indonesia (60111) 3Student, Delta Acadamy, HZ University of Applied Sciences, Edisonweg 4, 4382 NW Vlissingen, The Netherlands Abstract. The East Coast of Surabaya consists of large mangrove and fish pond areas. These areas are crucial for the ecosystem and for providing food and shelter for the local community. If the water quality decreases the mangroves will not be able to provide these functions. The water quality of these areas can be measured in two ways: by looking at the physico-chemical parameters or by looking at the biological parameters. Both offer a very good view of what state the area is in. The purpose of this study is to find out what the differences are between the Mulyorejo and the Wonorejo areas to see what differences there are within the East Coast of Surabaya and what could be the main cause of these differences. The data shows that the physico- chemical data does not comply with the limitation factors. The main problem are the nutrients which will have to be lowered to preserve the ecosystem. In terms of the biological state of the mangrove, there are few problems found. It is, however, unclear why the tree density in one of the Wonorejo areas is declining and it should be determined what the reason for this is.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of a Type 3 Metallothionein Isolated from Porteresia Coarctata
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 55 (1): 119-124, 2011 Characterization of a type 3 metallothionein isolated from Porteresia coarctata B. USHA, N.S. KEERAN, M. HARIKRISHNAN, K. KAVITHA and A. PARIDA* Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Taramani, Chennai-600113, India Abstract Metallothioneins are involved in detoxification of heavy metals. A cDNA encoding type 3 metallothionein (PcMT3) was isolated from the salt stressed leaf cDNA library of Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka (wild rice) that grows well in the heavy metal laden estuarine soils. The PcMT3 cDNA (581 bp) encodes a protein of 64 amino acids. PcMT3 is highly homologous (82 %) to OsMT-I-3a of rice, but is unique from other type 3 plant MTs due to the presence of an additional glycine residue in the C-terminal domain. Analysis of the 5′ upstream region of PcMT3 showed the presence of cis-acting elements like the CG box and STRE previously reported to be involved in gene expression under heavy metal stress. Southern analysis suggested the presence of more than one copy of PcMT3-like sequences in the P. coarctata genome. Analysis of genomic clone of PcMT3 revealed the presence of two introns. A comparison of the genomic sequence of PcMT3 with closely similar type 3 MTs from rice and mangrove species revealed conservation in the number and position of introns. Transcript profiling for PcMT3 in P. coarctata leaves in the presence of Cd, Cu and Zn showed an increase in transcript accumulation. Additional key words: cis-acting elements, heavy metals, salt stress, wild rice. Introduction Plants acquire heavy metal tolerance through various reported in plants like rice, hybrid poplar, oil palm and mechanisms like compartmentalization, sequestration, lichens (Abdullah et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (Motor Driver) on 04.09.2016
    Venue-wise list of eligible candidates for the written test for the post of Technician / Technician (Motor Driver) on 04.09.2016 Easo Bhavan, Ernakulam 1. Roll No 280170123 Mylapalli Anil, D.No.16-13-7, Kotha Jalaripeta, Visakhaptnam-530001 2. Roll No 280170124 Lotla Venkata Ramana, D.No. 32-3-28, Mahalakshmi street, Bowdara Road, Visakhapatnam-530004 3. Roll No 280170125 Ganta Nagireddy, D.No. 31-23-3, Simhaladevudu street, Allipuram, Visakhaptnam-530004 4. Roll No 280170126 Lotla Padmavathi, W/o. G. Nagireddy, D.No. 31-23-3, Simhaladevudu street, Allipuram, Visakhaptnam-530004 5. Roll No 280170127 SERU GOPINADH Pallepalem Ramayapatnam Vulavapadu(m) Prakasham (d), AP-523291 6. Roll No280180001 Ram Naresh Meena Vill Post Samidhi Teh. Nainina, Dist - Bundi State Rajasthan – 323801 7. Roll No280180002 Harikeshmeena Vill Post-Samidhi Teh.Nainwa, Dist - Bundi Rajastan – 323801 8. Roll No280180003 Sabiq N.M Noor Mahal Kavaratti, Lakshadweep 682555 9. Roll No280180004 K Pau Biak Lun Zenhanglamka, Old Bazar Lt. Street, CCPur, P.O. P.S. Manipur State -795128 10. Roll No280180005 Athira T.G. Thevarkuzhiyil (H) Pazhayarikandom P.O. Idukki – 685606 11. Roll No280180006 P Sree Ram Naik S/o P. Govinda Naik Pedapally (V)Puttapathy Anantapur- 517325 12. Roll No280180007 Amulya Toppo Kokkar Tunki Toli P.O. Bariatu Dist - Ranchi Jharkhand – 834009 13. Roll No280180008 Prakash Kumar A-1/321 Madhu Vihar Uttam Nagar Newdelhi – 110059 14. Roll No280180009 Rajesh Kumar Meena VPO Barwa Tehsil Bassi Dist Jaipur Rajasthan – 303305 15. Roll No280180010 G Jayaraj Kumar Shivalayam Nivas Mannipady Top P.O. Ramdas Nagar Kasargod 671124 16. Roll No280180011 Naseefahsan B Beathudeen (H) Agatti Island Lakshasweep 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonization Success of Common Thai Mangrove Species As a Function of Shelter from Water Movement
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 237: 111–120, 2002 Published July 18 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Colonization success of common Thai mangrove species as a function of shelter from water movement Udomluck Thampanya1, Jan E. Vermaat2,*, Carlos M. Duarte3 1Coastal Resources Institute, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand 2International Institute for Infrastructural, Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands 3IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, CSIC-Universidad, Illes Balears, C/Miguel Margués 21, 07190 Esporles, Mallorca, Spain ABSTRACT: Seedling survival and growth of the 3 common SE Asian mangrove species Avicennia alba, Rhizophora mucronata and Sonneratia caseolaris were quantified experimentally along 2 spatial gradients of shelter: (1) between 2 stations, at the inner and outer end of the sheltered Pak Phanang Bay (SW Thailand); and (2) for each station, among plots across a gradient of vegetation density from the mangrove forest edge inwards. Exposure to water movement, quantified as gypsum clod card weight loss, was found to vary more than 5-fold between seasons, which contributed most of the variance accounted for (73%). Variation between plots was higher than that between the 2 sta- tions: clod card loss ranged between 3.0 and 4.6 g d–1 in the plots, whereas the grand means of the 2 stations were 3.4 and 3.7 g d–1, respectively. These differences between stations and plots were com- parable to the patterns found for mangrove seedling survival. Survival was high (80 to 93%) in most treatments in R. mucronata, with the exception of the most exposed plot (30%).
    [Show full text]
  • LHA Recuritment Visakhapatnam Centre Screening Test Adhrapradesh Candidates at Mudasarlova Park Main Gate,Visakhapatnam.Contact No
    LHA Recuritment Visakhapatnam centre Screening test Adhrapradesh Candidates at Mudasarlova Park main gate,Visakhapatnam.Contact No. 0891-2733140 Date No. Of Candidates S. Nos. 12/22/2014 1300 0001-1300 12/23/2014 1300 1301-2600 12/24/2014 1299 2601-3899 12/26/2014 1300 3900-5199 12/27/2014 1200 5200-6399 12/28/2014 1200 6400-7599 12/29/2014 1200 7600-8799 12/30/2014 1177 8800-9977 Total 9977 FROM CANDIDATES / EMPLOYMENT OFFICES GUNTUR REGISTRATION NO. CASTE GENDER CANDIDATE NAME FATHER/ S. No. Roll Nos ADDRESS D.O.B HUSBAND NAME PRIORITY & P.H V.VENKATA MUNEESWARA SUREPALLI P.O MALE RAO 1 1 S/O ERESWARA RAO BHATTIPROLU BC-B MANDALAM, GUNTUR 14.01.1985 SHAIK BAHSA D.NO.1-8-48 MALE 2 2 S/O HUSSIAN SANTHA BAZAR BC-B CHILAKURI PETA ,GUNTUR 8/18/1985 K.NAGARAJU D.NO.7-2-12/1 MALE 3 3 S/O VENKATESWARULU GANGANAMMAPETA BC-A TENALI. 4/21/1985 SHAIK AKBAR BASHA D.NO.15-5-1/5 MALE 4 4 S/O MAHABOOB SUBHANI PANASATHOTA BC-E NARASARAO PETA 8/30/1984 S.VENUGOPAL H.NO.2-34 MALE 5 5 S/O S.UMAMAHESWARA RAO PETERU P.O BC-B REPALLI MANDALAM 7/20/1984 B.N.SAIDULU PULIPADU MALE 6 6 S/O PUNNAIAH GURAJALA MANDLAM ,GUNTUR BC-A 6/11/1985 G.RAMESH BABU BHOGASWARA PET MALE 7 7 S/O SIVANJANEYULU BATTIPROLU MANDLAM, GUNTUR BC-A 8/15/1984 K.NAGARAJENDRA KUMAR PAMIDIMARRU POST MALE 8 8 S/O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Ghats EPTRI - ENVIS Newsletter Estuarine Ecology of Eastern Ghats Foreword
    EPTRI - ENVIS Newsletter Vol. 10 No.4, 2004 Volume 10 No.4, 2004 The Eastern Ghats EPTRI - ENVIS Newsletter Estuarine Ecology of Eastern Ghats Foreword t was decided that we would bring out two issues of the Newsletter ‘The Eastern Ghats’ on Estuarine Ecology. This issue, Vol.10, No.4, 2004 includes the second and final part of the Iarticle: ‘Ecology and Biodiversity of Eastern Ghats – Estuaries of India’ by Rajendran, N et.al. We are pleased to include an article: ‘Coastal Follies and the Tsunami’ by Ashish Kothari and Manju Menon. The issue also contains the article: ‘Water Fowl Status at Coringa Wildlife Sanctuary, Andhra Pradesh’ by V. Vasudeva Rao, et.al. The stretch of Eastern Ghats from Orissa to Tamil Nadu , through Andhra Pradesh has numerous aspects of ecological importance. The endeavour, while bringing out the issues of this Newsletter, is to give importance to data gaps. Fragile eco-systems and hotspots of this broken mountainous terrain are important. Hence, an issue of this Newsletter would address this topic. We take this opportunity to draw the attention of our readers to send us articles and news clippings on ‘Fragile Ecosystems of Eastern Ghats,’ the theme of our forthcoming issue. ENVIS Coordinator Contents k Page No. 1. Foreword......................................................................................... 1 2.Ecology and Biodiversity of Eastern Ghats - Estuaries of India.................................................................. 2 3. Water fowl Status at Coringa Wildlife Sanctuary, Andhra Pradesh..................................................................... 7 4. Coastal Follies and the Tsunami...................................................... 13 5. News Items on “Post Tsunamic Changes –Estuaries..................... 14 Readers are...... WELCOME to contribute articles to our Newsletter. The theme of our next issue is on “Fragile Eco systems of Eastern Ghats”.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for Consultations on the Situation in Andhra Pradesh
    COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATIONS ON THE SITUATION IN ANDHRA PRADESH REPORT December 2010 THE COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON Shri Justice B N Srikrishna (Retd.) Former Judge, Supreme Court of India MEMBER SECRETARY Shri Vinod Kumar Duggal, IAS (Retd.) Former Home Secretary, Government of India MEMBERS Prof (Dr.) Ranbir Singh Vice Chancellor, National Law University, Delhi Dr. Abusaleh Shariff Chief Economist /Senior Fellow, National Council of Applied Economic Research, Delhi Prof (Dr.) Ravinder Kaur Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT, Delhi The Inter State Council Secretariat (ISCS) provided full secretarial assistance including technical and budgetary support to the Committee C O N T E N T S VOLUME - I Prologue i Approach and Methodology iv Acknowledgements xii List of Tables, Figures, Appendices xvii Abbreviations xxix Chapter 1 Developments in Andhra Pradesh-A Historical Background 1 Chapter 2 Regional Economic and Equity Analysis 63 Chapter 3 Education and Health 125 Chapter 4 Water Resources, Irrigation and Power Development 177 Chapter 5 Public Employment Issues 245 Chapter 6 Issues Relating to Hyderabad Metropolis 295 Chapter 7 Sociological and Cultural Issues 341 Chapter 8 Law & Order and Internal Security Dimensions 423 Chapter 9 The Way Forward 425 VOLUME - II Appendices 1-173 Index 174 “In ages long past a great son of India, the Buddha, said that the only real victory was one in which all were equally victorious and there was defeat for no one. In the world today that is the only practical victory; any other way will lead to disaster”. Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru speaking on „Disputes and Discord‟ in the United Nations General Assembly on October 3, 1960 Prologue It has not been an easy task.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline St1udy Training in Sea Safety Development
    BASELINE ST1UDY FOR TRAINING IN SEA SAFETY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME IN EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA. PRADESH NINA FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION OF TFIE UNITED NATIONS AND DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, GOVTOF ANDHRAPRADESH BY ACTION FOR FOOD PRODUCTION (AFPRO) FIELD UNIT VI, HYDERABAD 1998 TRAINING IN SEA SAFETY DEVELOPIVIENT PROGRAMME IN EAST GODA VARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH INDIA TCP/IND/6712 BASELINE STUDY November, 1997January, 1998 BY ACTION FOR FOOD PRODUCTION (AFPRO) FIELD UNIT VI, HYDERABAD 12-13-483/39, Street No.1, Tarnaka Secunderabad - 500 017 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, GOVT.OF ANDHRAPRADESH FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS The designations employed and the presentations of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Action for Food Production (AFPRO) Field Unit VI is grateful to the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and the Department of Fisheries Andhra Pradesh for giving the opportunityfor conducting the Baseline Study - Training in Sea Safety Development Programme in East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. Action for Food Production (AFPRO) Field Unit VI wish to thank the following for all the assistance and cooperation extended during the study. The Fisherfolk and Sarpanches of Balusitippa, Bhairavapalem and other villages (Mansanitippa, Komaragiri, Joggampetta, Gadimoga, Peddavalsula). Mr.O. Bhavani Shankar,Additional Director and Conunisioner ofFisheries in Charge, Hyderabad. Mr.Ch.Krishna Murthy, Joint Director of Fisheries, Hyderabad.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Among the Mangrove Species of Acanthaceae Found in Indian Sundarban, As Revealed by RAPD Analysis
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 2015, 6(3):179-184 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Phylogenetic relationships among the mangrove species of Acanthaceae found in Indian Sundarban, as revealed by RAPD analysis Surya Shekhar Das 1, Swati Das (Sur) 2 and Parthadeb Ghosh* 1Department of Botany, Bolpur College, Birbhum, West Bengal, India 2Department of Botany, Nabadwip Vidyasagar College, Nadia, West Bengal, India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT RAPD markers were successfully used to identify and differentiate all the five species of Acanthaceae found in the mangrove forest of Indian Sundarban, to assess the extent of interspecific genetic diversity among them, to reveal their molecular phylogeny and to throw some light on the systematic position of Avicennia. The dendrogram reveals that the five species under study exhibits an overall similarity of 60.7%. Avicennia alba and A. officinalis (cluster C1) have very close relationship between them and share a common node in the dendrogram at a 73.3% level of similarity. Avicennia marina and Acanthus ilicifolius (cluster C2) also have close relationship between them as evident by a common node in the dendrogram at 71.8% level of similarity. Acanthus volubilis showed 68.1% similarity with cluster C1 and 60.7% similarity with cluster C2. Our study also supported the view of placing Avicennia under Acanthaceae. Regarding the relative position of Avicennia within Acanthaceae, it was shown to be very close to Acanthoideae. In comparison to other species, A. marina showed most genetic variability, suggesting utilization of this species over others for breeding programme and as source material in in situ conservation programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread-Wing Postures and Their Possible Functions in the Ciconiidae
    THE AUK A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY Von. 88 Oc:roBE'a 1971 No. 4 SPREAD-WING POSTURES AND THEIR POSSIBLE FUNCTIONS IN THE CICONIIDAE M. P. KAI-IL IN two recent papers Clark (19'69) and Curry-Lindahl (1970) have reported spread-wingpostures in storks and other birds and discussed someof the functionsthat they may serve. During recent field studies (1959-69) of all 17 speciesof storks, I have had opportunitiesto observespread-wing postures. in a number of speciesand under different environmentalconditions (Table i). The contextsin which thesepostures occur shed somelight on their possible functions. TYPES OF SPREAD-WING POSTURES Varying degreesof wing spreadingare shownby at least 13 species of storksunder different conditions.In somestorks (e.g. Ciconia nigra, Euxenuragaleata, Ephippiorhynchus senegalensis, and ]abiru mycteria) I observedno spread-wingpostures and have foundno referenceto them in the literature. In the White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) I observedonly a wing-droopingposture--with the wings held a short distanceaway from the sidesand the primaries fanned downward--in migrant birds wetted by a heavy rain at NgorongoroCrater, Tanzania. Other species often openedthe wingsonly part way, in a delta-wingposture (Frontis- piece), in which the forearmsare openedbut the primariesremain folded so that their tips crossin front o.f or below the. tail. In some species (e.g. Ibis leucocephalus)this was the most commonly observedspread- wing posture. All those specieslisted in Table i, with the exception of C. ciconia,at times adopted a full-spreadposture (Figures i, 2, 3), similar to those referred to by Clark (1969) and Curry-Lindahl (1970) in severalgroups of water birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Environment Facility
    MONIQUE BARBUT GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY Chif!f Uf!CutiVf! Officf!r and Chairperson VEST ! G IN OUR PlA ET 1818 HStreet, NW Washington, DC 20·03 USA Tel: 202.~73.3Z02 fax: 202.5U.32401J2~5 E-mail: mbarbutttTheGEf.org February 16, 2011 Dear Council Member, The UNDP as the Implementing Agency for the project entitled: India: IND-BD Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation into Production Sectors in the Godavari River Estuary in Andhra Pradesh State under the India: IND-BD: GEF Coastal and Marine Program (IGCMP), has submitted the attached proposed project document for CEO endorsement prior to final Agency approval of the project document in accordance with the UNDP procedures. The Secretariat has reviewed the project document. It is consistent with the project concept approved by the Council in June 2009 and the proposed project remains consistent with the Instrument, and GEF policies and procedures. The attached explanation prepared by the UNDP satisfactorily details how Council's comments and those of the STAP have been addressed. We have today posted the proposed project document on the GEF website at www.TheGEF.or£! for your information. We would welcome any comments you may wish to provide by March 19, 2011 before I endorse the project. You may send your comments to [email protected] . If you do not have access to the Web, you may request the local field office of UNDP or the World Bank to download the document for you. Alternatively, you may request a copy of the document from the Secretariat. If you make such a request, please confirm for us your current mailing address: Sincerely, Attachment: Project Doc ume nt Copy to : Countly Operational Focal Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand Book of Statistics East Godavari District 2019
    HAND BOOK OF STATISTICS EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2019 . CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, E.G.DT., KAKINADA. Sri D. Muralidhar Reddy,I.A.S., District Collector & Magistrate, East Godavari, Kakinada. PREFACE I am delighted to release the Handbook of Statistics 2019 of East Godavari District with Statistical data of various departments for the year 2018-19. The Statistical data of different schemes implementing by various departments in the district have been collected and compiled in a systemic way so as to replicate the growth made under various sectors during the year. The Sector-wise progress has depicted in sector-wise tables apart from Mandal-wise data. I am sure that the publication will be of immense utility as a reference book to general public and Government and Non-Governmental agencies in general as well as Administrators, Planners, Research Scholars, Funding Agencies, Banks, Non-Profit Institutions etc., I am thankful to all District Officers and Heads of other Institutions for their co-operation by furnishing the information of their respective departments to the Chief Planning Officer for publication of this Handbook. I appreciate the efforts made by Chief Planning Officer, East Godavri District and his staff in collection and compilation of data to bring out this publication for 2018-19. Any suggestions meant for improvement of the Handbook are most welcome. Station : KAKINADA DISTRICT COLLECTOR Date : 25-10-2019 EAST GODAVARI, KAKINADA. OFFICERS AND STAFF ASSOCIATED WITH THE PUBLICATION 1. Sri K.V.K. Ratna Babu : Chief Planning Officer 2. Sri P. Balaji : Deputy Director 3. Smt. Aayesha Sultana : Statistical Officer 4. Sri G.
    [Show full text]