Introduction: Categories and the Question of Being
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Notes Introduction: Categories and the Question of Being 1. Ernst Cassirer, ‘Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik: Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretation’, Kant-Studien, 36 (1931), 17 (transla- tion by the present writer). 2. Marjorie Grene, Martin Heidegger (London: Bowes & Bowes, 1957), 66–7. 3. Karl Löwith, Heidegger: Denker in dürftiger Zeit (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1960), 78n (translation by the present writer). 4. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), 3; [Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Ingtraud Görland, Vol. 25 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977), 4–5]. Hereafter, refer- ences to the original text are given in parentheses after the page number of the translation. 5. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Raymund Schmidt (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1976), A 314/B 370. 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 2–3 (3–4). 7. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. Richard Taft (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), 141; [Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, 4th edition (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1973), 195]. 8. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (196). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 (4). 10. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 (4). 11. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 143 (198). 12. Thomas Langan, ‘Foreword’, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, by Martin Heidegger, trans. J.S. Churchill (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962), xii. 13. Charles Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1971), 6. 14. Heidegger at times makes this principle quite explicit. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 64 (93). 15. Claude Piché, ‘La Schématisme de la Raison Pure: Contribution au dossier Heidegger-Kant’, Études Philosophiques, 1986, 83 (translation by the present writer). 16. Charles Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time, 12–13. For a similar view, see William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967), 159. 17. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xx (xvii). 178 Notes 179 18. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 35 (40). 19. Ernst Cassirer, ‘Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics: Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretation’, 16. 20. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvii (xiii). 21. Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning), trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1999) 176, 217, 317; [Beiträge zur Philosophie, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Vol. 65 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1989), 250, 308, 451]. 22. Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy, 246 (351). 23. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), 8; [Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1979), 9]. See also Martin Heidegger’s History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), 3; [Prologomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, Vol. 20 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1979), 3–4]. 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 25. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 4 (6). 26. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 28 (32). 27. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 9 (10). See also History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, 2 (2–3). 28. Martin Heidegger, Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. Michael Heim (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), 56; [Metaphysische- Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz, ed. Klaus Held, Vol. 26 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978), 70]. 29. Martin Heidegger, Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 57 (70). 30. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 19, cf. 20 (21; cf. 22). 31. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 8–9 (10). 32. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 10–11 (12–13). 33. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 144 (154). 34. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans. Albert Hofstadter (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), 222; [Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Vol. 24 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 1975), 317]; cf. also Being and Time, 9 (10–11). 35. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 42 (44–45); cf. Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (296) and Martin Heidegger, What is a Thing? trans. W.B. Barton, Jr and Vera Deutsch (South Bend: Regnery/Gateway, 1967), 63; [Die Frage nach dem Ding (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1975), 48]. 36. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 129–30, B 168–9. 37. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 147/B 187. 38. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 166. 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (82–3). 40. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 16 (18). 41. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 23 (26). 180 Notes 42. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 20 (23). 43. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvii (xiv). If this passage is intended to date the ‘discovery’ of the importance of the schema- tism, Heidegger was surely forgetful when he wrote this fourth preface (1973), since he had already lectured in the winter semester of 1925–26 on the crucial importance of the schematism. 44. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 21 (24). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 114–15 (167). 46. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 3–4 (5). 47. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 46 (62). 48. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 149–50 (160). 49. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 113 (155). 50. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 60 (84–5). 51. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (195). 52. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B 29. 53. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xxvi. 54. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xxix. This and subsequent transla- tions from Kant are by the present writer except where noted. All emphases within quotations throughout this work are from the original source. 55. See Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 117 (162). 56. This is to ignore entirely Kant’s conception of the ‘free play of the faculties’, which he developed in the Critique of Judgement. Heidegger pays little atten- tion to this work, although it might be argued that here Kant provides his own account of the role of freedom in transcendence. 57. Martin Heidegger, The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 164–5 (210). 58. Martin Heidegger, ‘On the Essence of Ground’, trans. William McNeill, in Pathmarks, ed. William McNeill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 126; [‘Vom Wesen des Grundes’, in Wegmarken (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978), 162]. 59. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 118 (162); Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 189–90 (279). 60. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 109–12 (150–5). 61. Henri Declève, Heidegger et Kant (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970), 35 (translation by the present writer). 62. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvi–xvii (xiii–xiv). Heidegger had already made this change of mind public in 1950 in the fore- word to the second edition: Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xx (xvii). 1. Laying the Foundations of Metaphysics in Ontology 1. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 7–9 (8–12); and ‘What is Metaphysics?’ in Pathmarks. 2. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 9 (10–11); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (16–17); Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 45–46 (66). Notes 181 3. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 22. 4. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5 (8); see also Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 57 (70). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 9–11 (12–14); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 4–6 (8–9). 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 11–12 (15–16). 7. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 18 (26). (The original ‘is previously concealed’ is here made gram- matically consistent as ‘was previously concealed’.) 8. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (26). 9. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xiii; cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 22 (31). 10. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 5. 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 16–17 (23). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 17 (23). 13. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics,