DOCSLIB.ORG

Dark Matter: Theoretical Perspectives MICHAEL S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dark Matter: Theoretical Perspectives MICHAEL S Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 4827-4834, June 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a colloquium entitled "Physical Cosmology," organized by a committee chaired by David N. Schramm, held March 27 and 28, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Dark matter: Theoretical perspectives MICHAEL S. TURNER Departments of Physics and of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637-1433; and Theoretical Astrophysics, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510-0500 ABSTRACT I both review and make the case for the one sort or another (luminosity, size, or number density), current theoretical prejudice: a flat Universe whose dominant though hope was expressed at this colloquium that new constituent is nonbaryonic dark matter, emphasizing thatthis is techniques may change this situation (e.g., K-band Hubble still a prejudice and notyetfact. The theoretical motivation for diagram, K-band number counts, type I or II supernovae, and nonbaryonic dark matter is discussed in the context of current so on). At present, our knowledge ofQo derives primarily from elementary-particle theory, stressing that (i) there are no dynamical estimates that sample small, often atypical envi- dark-matter candidates within the "standard model" of par- ronments (e.g., rich clusters and bright spiral galaxies). There ticle physics, (ii) there are several compelling candidates within is an exception, the recent attempts to infer Qo based upon the attractive extensions of the standard model of particle physics, peculiar motion of the Local Group, which interestingly and (ii) the motivation for these compelling candidates comes enough yield a value for Qo oforder unity and with small error first and foremost from particle physics. The dark-matter estimates (6, 7). Beyond the fact that this measurement problem is now a pressing issue in both cosmology and particle supports theoretical prejudice, it may well come the closest to physics, and the detection of particle dark matter would weighing a large, fair sample of the Universe. provide evidence for "new physics." The compelling candi- What is clear is that most of the mass density is accounted dates are a very light axion (10-6-10-4 eV), a light neutrino for by dark matter (i.e., matter that neither emits nor absorbs (20-90 eV), and a heavy neutralino (10 GeV-2 TeV). The any radiation) and that fi0 is at least 0.1-and perhaps as high production of these particles in the early Universe and the as orderunity. Since primordial nucleosynthesis provides very prospects for their detection are also discussed. I briefly convincing evidence that baryonic matter can contribute no mention more exotic possibilities for the dark matter, including more than 10l%o of critical density (see, e.g., refs. 1-4), we are a nonzero cosmological constant, superheavy magnetic mono- left with two possibilities: (i) conclude that Qo lies at its lower poles, and decaying neutrinos. bound, that QB lies at its upper boundary, and that h S 0.5, in which case nOo QB = 0.1; or (ii) conclude that there is a Overview "gap" between no and QIB and consider the consequences. While the second possibility is the more radical, the evi- One of the simplest yet most fundamental questions we can dence for a gap, though not yet conclusive, continues to ask in cosmology concerns the quantity and composition of mount. If we accept this gap as real and make the leap all the the matter in the Universe: What is mass density, QO, way to a flat Universe, there are important implications: by a expressed as a fraction of the critical density, and what are wide margin, most ofthe Universe is made up ofnonbaryonic the contributions of the various constituents-e.g., baryons, matter, and because there are no nonbaryonic dark-matter photons, and whatever else? [The critical density PCRIT = candidates within the "standard model" of the elementary 3H0/8irG = 1.88h2 x 10-29 g-cm3 = 1.05 x 104 eV-cm3, particles, the dark-matter problem becomes one of pressing where Ho = 100h km sec-1 Mpc-1; 1 eV = 1.602 x 10-19 J; interest in particle physics also. Particle physics rises to the 1 megaparsec (Mpc) = 3.09 x 1022 m.] The answer to this occasion: in several of the most attractive extensions of their question bears upon almost every topic discussed at this standard model there are hypothetical particles whose moti- colloquium: the expansion age and fate of the Universe; the vations are unrelated to cosmology, but whose relic abun- origin of structure in the Universe and cosmic background dance is close to the closure density. The most promising are radiation (CBR) anisotropies; galactic disks, rotation curves, an axion of mass 10-6 eV-10-4 eV, a neutralino of mass 10 and morphology; cluster dynamics; gravitational lensing; and GeV-2 TeV, and a neutrino of mass 90h2 eV.* the distribution of light and mass. The only thing we know Most theorists would agree that a flat Universe dominated with great precision is the contribution of photons, nZ = by nonbaryonic matter is the most attractive hypothesis, so 2.49h-2 X 10-4 (assuming Tyo = 2.73 K), and neutrinos, Ql, attractive that it is sometimes forgotten that it is stilljust that. = 1.70h-2 X 10-4 (assuming all three species are massless); This paradigm has become an almost indispensable crutch for and based on primordial nucleosynthesis, we know the those who study the formation of structure. In fact, I know contribution of baryons to within a factor of two, nBh2 = of no viable model of structure formation based upon a 0.01-0.02 (see, e.g., refs. 1-4). Universe with no = nB Y 0.1.t In principle, the classic kinematic tests-luminosity- redshift, angular size-redshift, number count-redshift, and so Abbreviations: CBR, cosmic background radiation; GUT, grand on-can be used to determine no (provided that we know the unified theory; PQ, Peccei-Quinn; MOND, Milgrom's modified equation of state ofthe Universe) (5). To date these tests have Newtonian dynamics; QCD, Quantum Chromodynamics. not been successful because they require standard objects of *A massive neutrino is not considered part of the standard model because neutrino masses are not accommodated within the standard model of particle physics. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge tPeebles's isocurvature baryon model comes close, but as I under- payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" stand it, the model requires that QlB - 0.2 and h - 0.8 (refs. 8 and in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. 9). 4827 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 4828 Colloquium Paper: Tumer Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) That being the case, it is important that we take our well relaxed) and the fact that any material that is distributed theoretical beliefs seriously enough to test them! At our spherically symmetrically outside the region where galaxies disposal are a host of laboratory experiments and observa- reside would not contribute to the virial masses derived. And tional tests. They include cosmological measurements of Cl0, of course, the fundamental assumption is that cluster mass- Ho, the age of the Universe, CBR anisotropies, large-scale to-light ratios are typical, though less than 1 in 10 galaxies structure, and so on. In the laboratory there are efforts to resides in a cluster. We should note too that dark is a relative directly detect halo dark-matter particles, to produce new term: it is now known that much, if not the majority, of the particles at high-energy accelerators, and to detect dark- baryonic mass in clusters exists in the form of hot, x-ray matter annihilation products (coming from the sun or the emitting gas that is "dark" to an optical telescope (see, e.g., halo), as well as a multitude of experiments that search for ref. 19). evidence for neutrino masses. The virial masses of small groups and binary galaxies also provide evidence for dark matter, though the problem of Weighing the Universe interlopers is a severe one. The gravitational arcs produced by the lensing effect of clusters also indicate the presence of Neither measuring the mean density of the Universe nor cluster dark matter. Evidencefor dark matter in the Universe summarizing the measurements and putting them in perspec- is nowhere lacking. tive is a simple task (for a review, see refs. 10-13). Simply In my biased and very briefsummary, I have saved the best put, one would like to weigh a representative volume of the for last, a measurement that comes close to weighing a Universe, say lOOh-1 Mpc on a side. This is easier said than representative sample of the Universe of order lOOh-I Mpc done. Because of the inconclusiveness of the kinematic on a side. It involves tying our well-measured velocity with methods, I will focus on the dynamical measurements. respect to the CBR, about 620 km sec-1, to the inhomoge- The neous distribution ofmatter in the nearby Universe. In effect, dynamical measurements probe the mean density in a it is a simple problem in Newtonian physics: requiring our less than ideal way: a dynamical measurement (e.g., the virial velocity be produced by the inhomogeneous distribution of mass of a cluster) is converted into a mass-to-light ratio, galaxies allows us to weigh a very large sample of the which, when multiplied by the mean luminosity density Universe. Two important assumptions are made: that the (which itself has to be determined), yields an estimate of the distribution ofgalaxies traces the mass at some level and that mean mass density.* There is an obvious drawback: one has the bulk of our peculiar velocity arises from galaxies inside to assume the mass-to-light ratio derived for the object, or the survey volume and not outside.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry and Gravity
    universe Article Making a Quantum Universe: Symmetry and Gravity Houri Ziaeepour 1,2 1 Institut UTINAM, CNRS UMR 6213, Observatoire de Besançon, Université de Franche Compté, 41 bis ave. de l’Observatoire, BP 1615, 25010 Besançon, France; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking GU5 6NT, UK Received: 05 September 2020; Accepted: 17 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: So far, none of attempts to quantize gravity has led to a satisfactory model that not only describe gravity in the realm of a quantum world, but also its relation to elementary particles and other fundamental forces. Here, we outline the preliminary results for a model of quantum universe, in which gravity is fundamentally and by construction quantic. The model is based on three well motivated assumptions with compelling observational and theoretical evidence: quantum mechanics is valid at all scales; quantum systems are described by their symmetries; universe has infinite independent degrees of freedom. The last assumption means that the Hilbert space of the Universe has SUpN Ñ 8q – area preserving Diff.pS2q symmetry, which is parameterized by two angular variables. We show that, in the absence of a background spacetime, this Universe is trivial and static. Nonetheless, quantum fluctuations break the symmetry and divide the Universe to subsystems. When a subsystem is singled out as reference—observer—and another as clock, two more continuous parameters arise, which can be interpreted as distance and time. We identify the classical spacetime with parameter space of the Hilbert space of the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Kaluza-Klein Covariance
    CONSEQUENCES OF KALUZA-KLEIN COVARIANCE Paul S. Wesson Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada Space-Time-Matter Consortium, http://astro.uwaterloo.ca/~wesson PACs: 11.10Kk, 11.25Mj, 0.45-h, 04.20Cv, 98.80Es Key Words: Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, Gravity, Relativity, Higher Di- mensions Addresses: Mail to Waterloo above; email: [email protected] Abstract The group of coordinate transformations for 5D noncompact Kaluza-Klein theory is broader than the 4D group for Einstein’s general relativity. Therefore, a 4D quantity can take on different forms depending on the choice for the 5D coordinates. We illustrate this by deriving the physical consequences for several forms of the canonical metric, where the fifth coordinate is altered by a translation, an inversion and a change from spacelike to timelike. These cause, respectively, the 4D cosmological ‘constant’ to be- come dependent on the fifth coordinate, the rest mass of a test particle to become measured by its Compton wavelength, and the dynamics to become wave-mechanical with a small mass quantum. These consequences of 5D covariance – whether viewed as positive or negative – help to determine the viability of current attempts to unify gravity with the interactions of particles. 1. Introduction Covariance, or the ability to change coordinates while not affecting the validity of the equations, is an essential property of any modern field theory. It is one of the found- ing principles for Einstein’s theory of gravitation, general relativity. However, that theory is four-dimensional, whereas many theories which seek to unify gravitation with the interactions of particles use higher-dimensional spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy and Dark Matter As Inertial Effects Introduction
    Dark Energy and Dark Matter as Inertial Effects Serkan Zorba Department of Physics and Astronomy, Whittier College 13406 Philadelphia Street, Whittier, CA 90608 [email protected] ABSTRACT A disk-shaped universe (encompassing the observable universe) rotating globally with an angular speed equal to the Hubble constant is postulated. It is shown that dark energy and dark matter are cosmic inertial effects resulting from such a cosmic rotation, corresponding to centrifugal (dark energy), and a combination of centrifugal and the Coriolis forces (dark matter), respectively. The physics and the cosmological and galactic parameters obtained from the model closely match those attributed to dark energy and dark matter in the standard Λ-CDM model. 20 Oct 2012 Oct 20 ph] - PACS: 95.36.+x, 95.35.+d, 98.80.-k, 04.20.Cv [physics.gen Introduction The two most outstanding unsolved problems of modern cosmology today are the problems of dark energy and dark matter. Together these two problems imply that about a whopping 96% of the energy content of the universe is simply unaccounted for within the reigning paradigm of modern cosmology. arXiv:1210.3021 The dark energy problem has been around only for about two decades, while the dark matter problem has gone unsolved for about 90 years. Various ideas have been put forward, including some fantastic ones such as the presence of ghostly fields and particles. Some ideas even suggest the breakdown of the standard Newton-Einstein gravity for the relevant scales. Although some progress has been made, particularly in the area of dark matter with the nonstandard gravity theories, the problems still stand unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalness and New Approaches to the Hierarchy Problem
    Naturalness and New Approaches to the Hierarchy Problem PiTP 2017 Nathaniel Craig Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 No warranty expressed or implied. This will eventually grow into a more polished public document, so please don't disseminate beyond the PiTP community, but please do enjoy. Suggestions, clarifications, and comments are welcome. Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.0.1 The proton mass . .3 1.0.2 Flavor hierarchies . .4 2 The Electroweak Hierarchy Problem 5 2.1 A toy model . .8 2.2 The naturalness strategy . 13 3 Old Hierarchy Solutions 16 3.1 Lowered cutoff . 16 3.2 Symmetries . 17 3.2.1 Supersymmetry . 17 3.2.2 Global symmetry . 22 3.3 Vacuum selection . 26 4 New Hierarchy Solutions 28 4.1 Twin Higgs / Neutral naturalness . 28 4.2 Relaxion . 31 4.2.1 QCD/QCD0 Relaxion . 31 4.2.2 Interactive Relaxion . 37 4.3 NNaturalness . 39 5 Rampant Speculation 42 5.1 UV/IR mixing . 42 6 Conclusion 45 1 1 Introduction What are the natural sizes of parameters in a quantum field theory? The original notion is the result of an aggregation of different ideas, starting with Dirac's Large Numbers Hypothesis (\Any two of the very large dimensionless numbers occurring in Nature are connected by a simple mathematical relation, in which the coefficients are of the order of magnitude unity" [1]), which was not quantum in nature, to Gell- Mann's Totalitarian Principle (\Anything that is not compulsory is forbidden." [2]), to refinements by Wilson and 't Hooft in more modern language.
    [Show full text]
  • Wimps and Machos ENCYCLOPEDIA of ASTRONOMY and ASTROPHYSICS
    WIMPs and MACHOs ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS WIMPs and MACHOs objects that could be the dark matter and still escape detection. For example, if the Galactic halo were filled –3 . WIMP is an acronym for weakly interacting massive par- with Jupiter mass objects (10 Mo) they would not have ticle and MACHO is an acronym for massive (astrophys- been detected by emission or absorption of light. Brown . ical) compact halo object. WIMPs and MACHOs are two dwarf stars with masses below 0.08Mo or the black hole of the most popular DARK MATTER candidates. They repre- remnants of an early generation of stars would be simi- sent two very different but reasonable possibilities of larly invisible. Thus these objects are examples of what the dominant component of the universe may be. MACHOs. Other examples of this class of dark matter It is well established that somewhere between 90% candidates include primordial black holes created during and 99% of the material in the universe is in some as yet the big bang, neutron stars, white dwarf stars and vari- undiscovered form. This material is the gravitational ous exotic stable configurations of quantum fields, such glue that holds together galaxies and clusters of galaxies as non-topological solitons. and plays an important role in the history and fate of the An important difference between WIMPs and universe. Yet this material has not been directly detected. MACHOs is that WIMPs are non-baryonic and Since extensive searches have been done, this means that MACHOS are typically (but not always) formed from this mysterious material must not emit or absorb appre- baryonic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryogenesis in a CP Invariant Theory That Utilizes the Stochastic Movement of Light fields During Inflation
    Baryogenesis in a CP invariant theory Anson Hook School of Natural Sciences Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 June 12, 2018 Abstract We consider baryogenesis in a model which has a CP invariant Lagrangian, CP invariant initial conditions and does not spontaneously break CP at any of the minima. We utilize the fact that tunneling processes between CP invariant minima can break CP to implement baryogenesis. CP invariance requires the presence of two tunneling processes with opposite CP breaking phases and equal probability of occurring. In order for the entire visible universe to see the same CP violating phase, we consider a model where the field doing the tunneling is the inflaton. arXiv:1508.05094v1 [hep-ph] 20 Aug 2015 1 1 Introduction The visible universe contains more matter than anti-matter [1]. The guiding principles for gener- ating this asymmetry have been Sakharov’s three conditions [2]. These three conditions are C/CP violation • Baryon number violation • Out of thermal equilibrium • Over the years, counter examples have been found for Sakharov’s conditions. One can avoid the need for number violating interactions in theories where the negative B L number is stored − in a sector decoupled from the standard model, e.g. in right handed neutrinos as in Dirac lep- togenesis [3, 4] or in dark matter [5]. The out of equilibrium condition can be avoided if one uses spontaneous baryogenesis [6], where a chemical potential is used to create a non-zero baryon number in thermal equilibrium. However, these models still require a C/CP violating phase or coupling in the Lagrangian.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Cosmology," Organized by a Committee Chaired by David N
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, p. 4765, June 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper serves as an introduction to the following papers, which were presented at a colloquium entitled "Physical Cosmology," organized by a committee chaired by David N. Schramm, held March 27 and 28, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Physical cosmology DAVID N. SCHRAMM Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 The Colloquium on Physical Cosmology was attended by 180 much notoriety. The recent report by COBE of a small cosmologists and science writers representing a wide range of primordial anisotropy has certainly brought wide recognition scientific disciplines. The purpose of the colloquium was to to the nature of the problems. The interrelationship of address the timely questions that have been raised in recent structure formation scenarios with the established parts of years on the interdisciplinary topic of physical cosmology by the cosmological framework, as well as the plethora of new bringing together experts of the various scientific subfields observations and experiments, has made it timely for a that deal with cosmology. high-level international scientific colloquium on the subject. Cosmology has entered a "golden age" in which there is a The papers presented in this issue give a wonderful mul- tifaceted view of the current state of modem physical cos- close interplay between theory and observation-experimen- mology. Although the actual COBE anisotropy announce- tation. Pioneering early contributions by Hubble are not ment was made after the meeting reported here, the following negated but are amplified by this current, unprecedented high papers were updated to include the new COBE data.
    [Show full text]
  • Axions and Other Similar Particles
    1 91. Axions and Other Similar Particles 91. Axions and Other Similar Particles Revised October 2019 by A. Ringwald (DESY, Hamburg), L.J. Rosenberg (U. Washington) and G. Rybka (U. Washington). 91.1 Introduction In this section, we list coupling-strength and mass limits for light neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons that couple weakly to normal matter and radiation. Such bosons may arise from the spon- taneous breaking of a global U(1) symmetry, resulting in a massless Nambu-Goldstone (NG) boson. If there is a small explicit symmetry breaking, either already in the Lagrangian or due to quantum effects such as anomalies, the boson acquires a mass and is called a pseudo-NG boson. Typical examples are axions (A0)[1–4] and majorons [5], associated, respectively, with a spontaneously broken Peccei-Quinn and lepton-number symmetry. A common feature of these light bosons φ is that their coupling to Standard-Model particles is suppressed by the energy scale that characterizes the symmetry breaking, i.e., the decay constant f. The interaction Lagrangian is −1 µ L = f J ∂µ φ , (91.1) where J µ is the Noether current of the spontaneously broken global symmetry. If f is very large, these new particles interact very weakly. Detecting them would provide a window to physics far beyond what can be probed at accelerators. Axions are of particular interest because the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) mechanism remains perhaps the most credible scheme to preserve CP-symmetry in QCD. Moreover, the cold dark matter (CDM) of the universe may well consist of axions and they are searched for in dedicated experiments with a realistic chance of discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter and the Early Universe: a Review Arxiv:2104.11488V1 [Hep-Ph
    Dark matter and the early Universe: a review A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi Univ Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon, UMR 5822, 69622 Villeurbanne, France Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Institut Universitaire de France, 103 boulevard Saint-Michel, 75005 Paris, France Abstract Dark matter represents currently an outstanding problem in both cosmology and particle physics. In this review we discuss the possible explanations for dark matter and the experimental observables which can eventually lead to the discovery of dark matter and its nature, and demonstrate the close interplay between the cosmological properties of the early Universe and the observables used to constrain dark matter models in the context of new physics beyond the Standard Model. arXiv:2104.11488v1 [hep-ph] 23 Apr 2021 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Standard Cosmological Model 3 2.1 Friedmann-Lema^ıtre-Robertson-Walker model . 4 2.2 A quick story of the Universe . 5 2.3 Big-Bang nucleosynthesis . 8 3 Dark matter(s) 9 3.1 Observational evidences . 9 3.1.1 Galaxies . 9 3.1.2 Galaxy clusters . 10 3.1.3 Large and cosmological scales . 12 3.2 Generic types of dark matter . 14 4 Beyond the standard cosmological model 16 4.1 Dark energy . 17 4.2 Inflation and reheating . 19 4.3 Other models . 20 4.4 Phase transitions . 21 5 Dark matter in particle physics 21 5.1 Dark matter and new physics . 22 5.1.1 Thermal relics . 22 5.1.2 Non-thermal relics .
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Cosmic Probes of Ultra-Light Axion Dark Matter
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Cosmic probes of ultra-light axion dark matter Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (TF09) Astro-particle physics and cosmology Contact Information: Name (Institution) [email]: Keir K. Rogers (Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University; Dunlap Institute, University of Toronto) [ [email protected]] Authors: Simeon Bird (UC Riverside), Simon Birrer (Stanford University), Djuna Croon (TRIUMF), Alex Drlica-Wagner (Fermilab, University of Chicago), Jeff A. Dror (UC Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Daniel Grin (Haverford College), David J. E. Marsh (Georg-August University Goettingen), Philip Mocz (Princeton), Ethan Nadler (Stanford), Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (University of New Hamp- shire), Keir K. Rogers (Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University; Dunlap Insti- tute, University of Toronto), Katelin Schutz (MIT), Neelima Sehgal (Stony Brook University), Yu-Dai Tsai (Fermilab), Tien-Tien Yu (University of Oregon), Yimin Zhong (University of Chicago). Abstract: Ultra-light axions are a compelling dark matter candidate, motivated by the string axiverse, the strong CP problem in QCD, and possible tensions in the CDM model. They are hard to probe experimentally, and so cosmological/astrophysical observations are very sensitive to the distinctive gravitational phenomena of ULA dark matter. There is the prospect of probing fifteen orders of magnitude in mass, often down to sub-percent contributions to the DM in the next ten to twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy and Dark Matter
    Dark Energy and Dark Matter Jeevan Regmi Department of Physics, Prithvi Narayan Campus, Pokhara [email protected] Abstract: The new discoveries and evidences in the field of astrophysics have explored new area of discussion each day. It provides an inspiration for the search of new laws and symmetries in nature. One of the interesting issues of the decade is the accelerating universe. Though much is known about universe, still a lot of mysteries are present about it. The new concepts of dark energy and dark matter are being explained to answer the mysterious facts. However it unfolds the rays of hope for solving the various properties and dimensions of space. Keywords: dark energy, dark matter, accelerating universe, space-time curvature, cosmological constant, gravitational lensing. 1. INTRODUCTION observations. Precision measurements of the cosmic It was Albert Einstein first to realize that empty microwave background (CMB) have shown that the space is not 'nothing'. Space has amazing properties. total energy density of the universe is very near the Many of which are just beginning to be understood. critical density needed to make the universe flat The first property that Einstein discovered is that it is (i.e. the curvature of space-time, defined in General possible for more space to come into existence. And Relativity, goes to zero on large scales). Since energy his cosmological constant makes a prediction that is equivalent to mass (Special Relativity: E = mc2), empty space can possess its own energy. Theorists this is usually expressed in terms of a critical mass still don't have correct explanation for this but they density needed to make the universe flat.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Description of Dark Matter As a Viscous Fluid
    Motivation Framework Perturbation theory Effective viscosity Results FRG improvement Conclusions Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid Nikolaos Tetradis University of Athens Work with: D. Blas, S. Floerchinger, M. Garny, U. Wiedemann . N. Tetradis University of Athens Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid Motivation Framework Perturbation theory Effective viscosity Results FRG improvement Conclusions Distribution of dark and baryonic matter in the Universe Figure: 2MASS Galaxy Catalog (more than 1.5 million galaxies). N. Tetradis University of Athens Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid Motivation Framework Perturbation theory Effective viscosity Results FRG improvement Conclusions Inhomogeneities Inhomogeneities are treated as perturbations on top of an expanding homogeneous background. Under gravitational attraction, the matter overdensities grow and produce the observed large-scale structure. The distribution of matter at various redshifts reflects the detailed structure of the cosmological model. Define the density field δ = δρ/ρ0 and its spectrum hδ(k)δ(q)i ≡ δD(k + q)P(k): . N. Tetradis University of Athens Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid 31 timation method in its entirety, but it should be equally valid. 7.3. Comparison to other results Figure 35 compares our results from Table 3 (modeling approach) with other measurements from galaxy surveys, but must be interpreted with care. The UZC points may contain excess large-scale power due to selection function effects (Padmanabhan et al. 2000; THX02), and the an- gular SDSS points measured from the early data release sample are difficult to interpret because of their extremely broad window functions.
    [Show full text]