DOCSLIB.ORG

A Nose for Nimbys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Nose for Nimbys FEATURE ANose for NIMBYs by Chris Robbins Don’t worry if you are missing something that’s a normal part of com- decision-making, for example: a previous your favorite science-fiction munity life. Perhaps they are beside owner put a covenant on the land that show to conduct a public hearing themselves because they moved to their restricts its use, or the project would current location to escape development damage a unique environmental at the Planning Commission. You may be that is now inexorably following them. resource. Sometimes there’s an alterna- lucky enough to see shape-shifters in real Perhaps they are secretly panicking at the tive that makes more sense. If these con- life. If you are considering a land use idea of outsiders in their territory, cerns have substance, respond to them; change that will affect a residential whether it be “those people” moving in don’t treat a project as a “done deal.” neighborhood, perfectly normal, rational down the block, or motorists driving past 3. Address concerns in a realistic way. people will grow fangs and acquire the their homes to get to another destination. The usual outcome of contentious pro- ability to spit fire. Changes in the neigh- jects is that the objections are addressed borhood spark a primitive reaction in through conditions or modifications to defense of home and family. As a plan- SAPLANNING A the project. This may not satisfy the ning commissioner, you need to keep COMMISSIONER, YOU NEED opponents, but it shows respect for their your cool when confronted by angry TO KEEP YOUR COOL concerns. You should insist on an neighbors, and recognize the difference WHEN CONFRONTED BY enforceable way to ensure that the condi- between legitimate concerns and irra- tions or modifications are actually put tional fears. You need a nose for NIMBYs. ANGRY NEIGHBORS, AND RECOGNIZE THE into place. Too often a bone is tossed to Here are some points to remember: the concerned citizens, only to be pulled DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 1. NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard) is away again as soon as the project is human nature, but sometimes you need to LEGITIMATE CONCERNS under way. rise above it. The most common neigh- AND IRRATIONAL FEARS. 4. Don’t let your own emotions get the borhood concerns are: “Don’t increase better of you. It’s easy to feel sorry for the traffic past my house. The children will beleaguered neighbors and do something be at risk.” “Don’t allow smaller lots or that’s not in the interest of the communi- Your job is to look out for the whole smaller homes in my neighborhood. My ty as a whole. It’s also easy to react the community: townhouse and apartment property value could decline.” “I was other way and dig in your heels in dwellers as well as single family resi- told that this street would never go response to annoying and pushy people, dents, and people living on through through, this land would never be devel- just to show them you can’t be bullied. streets as well as those who want to live oped, etc. How can you betray these Try to separate the personalities from the on dead-ends and force the traffic onto promises?” substance of what they’re saying. other streets. Ask questions or have staff Concerned citizens are right to be With a good nose, you will be able to find the information you need to evalu- alert to neighborhood threats, but tell when people cease making legitimate ate the concerns. Is the traffic going to be NIMBYs carry it to an extreme, exagger- points and slide into NIMBYism. Make greater than the standards for the street? ating the threats or refusing to accept a note of the good points, and ignore Is the proposed land use so noxious that the rest. ◆ it would reduce property values, or is it Glossary: simply something different from what‘s Chris Robbins has been there? Were the “promises” made by a a member of the North- NIMBY: Not in my city representative or by a realtor? If the field, Minnesota (popula- back yard concerns don’t hold up, don’t feel guilty tion, 17,000) Planning Commission for the past LULU: Locally unwanted land use about voting in favor of the project. NOPE: Not on planet earth four years. She is an envi- 2. NIMBYs can have their positive side. ronmental planner who has GOOMBY: Get out of my back yard No one else is so highly motivated to worked for consulting NIMEY: Not in my election year do research into the issues and the his- firms and non-profits in the BANANA: Build absolutely nothing tory of the area. Sometimes in their past. Chris is currently an environmental planning anywhere near anything quest to stop a project, people will intern for the City of Minnetonka, a suburb of uncover information that does help your Minneapolis. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 51 / SUMMER 2003 1 Dealing With NIMBYs “Some of our most dedicated and educat- NIMBYs are Not ed planning commission members and Environmentalists activists became involved originally because Be a Leader “I’ve been in planning for 33 years, includ- of neighborhood issues. One thing about ing a few years as a planning commissioner. “The most important point in dealing with having something in your backyard is that The media has a tendency to call all NIMBYs NIMBYs is to look at the big picture and it forces you to become well versed on all ‘environmentalists.’ My experience has been what’s in the best interest of the community sides of the issues. You get to see how your that many NIMBYs are people who do not as a whole. It all boils down to appointing government really operates. Einstein once wish to see any form of change in their and electing ‘leaders.’ Too often NIMBYs get stated that ‘In the middle of difficulty lies immediate environment, especially if the their way when it wasn’t in the best interest opportunity.’ I like to think that NIMBYs change represents a threat to their proper- of the whole just because people without have ultimately led to improved govern- ty’s value or to their personal ‘quality of conviction are making the decision.” mental processes for citizens in my county.” life.’ They use environmental arguments – Maureen France, City Commissioner, City – Chris Mueller, Dearborn County, Indiana to support their primary opposition to a of DeLand, Florida particular project, but I would hardly consider them environmentalists. The real Opportunities “An old timer in the ways of local politics once offered me some simple advice: ‘I want environmentalists are those citizens who “Sometimes NIMBYs are the citizen’s first my enemies right next to me and my appear before public bodies to debate issues exposure to planning and zoning. While friends in the audience.’ Sometimes, when related to community-wide planning the best time to be first involved would time permits, a challenge to the NIMBYs to policies.” have been back when the community plan become involved in the process can help. – Paul Wack, AICP, San Luis Obispo, was being developed, NIMBY situations can Once involved they sometimes are able to California nevertheless be viewed as an opportunity see things from a wider perspective. Not for citizen involvement. something that can be done every time, but Legitimate Concerns v. NIMBYism Quite often, interested citizens will stay occasionally it works.” involved after the issue involving the “My background is as a non-profit afford- – James Q. Gulnac, AICP, Planning Director, NIMBY goes away. If they are reasonable able housing project coordinator and cur- Sanford, Maine people, an attempt should be made to rently as a child care facilities development recruit these interested citizens into the consultant. In affordable housing circles Consistency system. Also, bear in mind that planners there has been a move to avoid using the don’t have a monopoly on common sense. “As a County Commissioner I faced a lot NIMBY phrase. It is instantly accusatory We should at least make an effort to listen of NIMBYism. What I’ve found most impor- and tends to put people on the defensive to those citizens who take the time to tant is that the process for including public rather than opening up the door to real appear before us.” opinion must be fair and consistent with communication. past policy. You’ll find that people will My second thought is that there should – Tim Anderson, AICP, Principal Planner, accept a disagreement in the end, but if be a distinction made between neighbors Region 2 Planning Commission, Jackson, they feel like it was shoved down their who have legitimate concerns related to Michigan throats, it will be a disaster.” traffic, parking, drainage, etc. and those who are basically objecting to ‘those kinds – State Representative Bill Hinkle, Cle Elum, of people’ moving in next door. For people Washington Not in my back yard Locally unwanted land use Not on planet earth PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 51 / SUMMER 2003 2 with legitimate concerns the task then lems, existing traffic congestion, chopped … and Call Your Lawyer becomes a balancing act to look at both up streets, and so on. As a trade-off for “I’m sure you’ve all heard of the phenome- immediate local negative impacts of a pro- increasing the density under less than non of NIMBYism – Not In My Back Yard ject and the greater community good of favorable conditions, the municipality ism. Every time a new building is proposed providing the housing or services that will should be prepared to give something back absolutely anywhere in America, you can help build a stronger more sustainable com- to the neighborhood such as upgraded guarantee that somebody or some group, munity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Housing & Neighborhoods
    HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOODS “Civilization needs an honorable dwelling place, and the conditions of making that place ought to depend on what is most honorable in our nature: on love, hope, generosity, and aspiration” – James Howard Kunstler 5555 MILWAUKEEMIMILLWWAAUUKKEEE CITYWIDECCIITTYYWWIIDEDE PPOLICYOOLLICICY PPLPLANLAANN VISION FOR OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION Milwaukee has a long and rich history of ethnic SUCCESS settlements that have created strong diverse neighborhoods throughout the city. The traditional This plan envisions the active urban pattern of development in the city located good quality housing near employment centers and public preservation and support of Milwaukee’s transit options. The most dynamic city neighborhoods many safe, diverse, thriving, culturally tend to have strong neighborhood centers, vibrant commercial main streets, parks, churches and schools, rich and walkable neighborhoods that and cultural facilities all of which supported a core sense provide residents with ample housing, of community and neighborhood identity. These strong urban neighborhoods have been retained as Milwaukee recreational, and lifestyle alternatives. has grown and redeveloped through the years and have ensured that Milwaukee has a wide range of housing and traditional neighborhood choices. The vision of success for Housing and Neighborhoods includes: HOUSING Housing is an important land use occupying 41% of the developable land area of the city and accounting for Quality Housing Choices approximately 70% of the assessed value. The City of Milwaukee has over 249,000 housing units, according Neighborhoods will have a range of high- to the 2008 U.S. Census American Community Survey, quality, well maintained housing options 70% of which are single family, condominium or duplex buildings, the remaining 30% are in multifamily buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing for Human Needs
    DESIGNING FOR HUMAN NEEDS: A NEW MODEL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN-AIR CENTER by SARA FIORE (Under the Direction of David Spooner) ABSTRACT The open-air center is one of the most common forms of development found in the American landscape. These developments, however, typically are designed to accommodate automobiles at the expense of the needs of humans and, in particular, pedestrians. In order to address this issue, this thesis identifies the effect of current open- air center designs on human needs and explains how designers can improve upon the current model. An exploration of general human needs theory and, specifically, literature that defines the relationship between human needs and the built environment help to create of a set of eight “theorems” that address human needs specifically within a neighborhood open-air center. Current case study models are examined with a focus on human needs. These findings are applied to a redesign of the Barnett Shoals corridor in Athens, GA. The goal of the thesis is to generate a new form and function for the neighborhood open-air center to serve as a model for future development. INDEX WORDS: Human Needs Theory, Maslow, Neighborhood Open-Air Center, Strip Mall, Retrofit, Suburbia DESIGNING FOR HUMAN NEEDS: A NEW MODEL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN-AIR CENTER by SARA FIORE B.A., Boston College, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2009 © 2009 Sara Fiore All Rights Reserved DESIGNING FOR HUMAN NEEDS: A NEW MODEL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN-AIR CENTER by SARA FIORE Major Professor: David Spooner Committee: Danny Bivins Andrew Fox Lara Mathes Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2009 iv DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my Grandpa Rocco, who passed down his love of nature, art, and creativity to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Umi-Umd-2518.Pdf
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: RE-WEAVING THE URBAN FABRIC: A NEW MIDTOWN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IN NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA Abigail Buckley Cronin, Master of Architecture, 2005 Thesis Directed by: Professor Roger K. Lewis School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation American cities have been struggling with suburban sprawl and urban flight for the last fifty years. With rising costs, lengthening commutes, limited resources and shrinking open land, many residents are reconsidering life outside the city. If communities are to reevaluate their settlement patterns and look to new life in the urban center, to what extent can urban design and architecture re-weave and revive a once thriving district on the verge of collapse? Downtown Newport News has witnessed an urban flight, leaving the city abandoned and deteriorating. This thesis will propose to reconnect midtown with the Parkside community to provide public amenity, increased access, and future growth potential, serving as a prototype for development within Newport News and beyond. A variety of housing options will be explored, with the premise that instead of providing only parking for the shipyard, the city should provide housing options, close to work and other amenities that can result from a dynamic urban waterfront community RE-WEAVING THE URBAN FABRIC: A NEW MIDTOWN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IN NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA by Abigail Buckley Cronin Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements
    [Show full text]
  • How to Mess up a Town by James Howard Kunstler the Town Where I Live, Saratoga the 1950S and Replaced by Strip Malls with County Road Across from the Old Dump
    INSIGHTS How To Mess Up a Town by James Howard Kunstler The town where I live, Saratoga the 1950s and replaced by strip malls with county road across from the old dump. Springs, New York, like practically huge parking lots fronting on Broadway The reason it was moved, by the way, was every other town in America, is and its adjoining streets. All sorts of inap- because there wasn’t enough parking. Do propriate suburban building forms were you suppose the children cared about the under assault by forces that want to turn it imposed on downtown sites — ridiculous parking? into another version of Paramus, New Jer- one-story structures with blank walls, sur- Saratoga’s plight has been aggravated sey, with all the highway crud, chain store rounded by bark mulch beds and, of by the fact that the northernmost of its servitude, and loss of community that pat- course, acres of parking lots — destroying gateways, Exit 15 of Interstate 87, lies tern of development entails. within the adjoining town of Wilton, Ironically, the forces who are ready to which has aggressively turned the land permit the most radical damage to the THE PUBLIC REALM IS around Exit 15 into a feeding frenzy for town’s historic character consider them- mall builders, national discount stores, selves the most conservative; while the THE PHYSICAL franchise fry pits, and other agents of sub- groups most concerned with preserving MANIFESTATION OF THE urban sprawl in order to pay for its grow- the town’s best features, and even enhanc- COMMON GOOD. ing roster of “revenue-loser” residential ing them, have been branded radical.
    [Show full text]
  • This Represents the Title
    i PROGRESSIVE AND REACTIONARY ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGY IN TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE, 1937- 2013. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Literature. in the University of Canterbury by Michael Gordon Ralph Potts. Student Number 21428772 Department of English, University of Canterbury 2014 ii Table of Contents. Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Chapter One: Orwell’s Troubling Syllogism.……………………………………………………………………47 Chapter Two: Blood and Soil: Cultural Identity and Locality in The Lord of the Rings……..76 Chapter Three: Anti-Technology and Over-Population…………………………………………………..106 Chapter four: Purification and Rebirth: Anti-technologism and Catastrophe………………….145 Chapter Five: Wildness and Wilderness: Edward Abbey and Anarcho-Libertarian Anti- Technologism………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...173 Chapter Six: Meaning and Modernity: Anti-technologism and the Fascist Aesthetic……….205 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………241 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….271 iii Acknowledgements. I would like to gratefully acknowledge the help, support and advice I have received from family, friends, colleagues and my supervisors during the course of researching and writing this PhD. In particular, I would like to thank my parents, for their help, support, and advice, and my partner, Belinda Gibbs, for her understanding and support. I would also like to express my gratitude to my supervisors, Dan Bedggood and Philip Armstrong, not only for their advice and support, but also for their patience and for the cogent and helpful remarks and suggestions regarding my thesis and their efforts 1 Abstract. In this thesis I trace the origins, morphology, and attributes of a particular strain of anti- materialism in the Western literary and cultural imagination of the second half of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhineland's Is a Fine-Land Once More: Mobility Minded Redevelopment of Cincinnati's Historic OTR District
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 27-May-2010 I, Timothy Neely , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture in Architecture (Master of) It is entitled: Rhineland’s a Fine-Land Once More: Mobility minded redevelopment of Cincinnati’s historic OTR district Student Signature: Timothy Neely This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Nnamdi Elleh, PhD Nnamdi Elleh, PhD Aarati Kanekar, PhD Aarati Kanekar, PhD 5/27/2010 849 Rhineland’s a Fine-Land Once More: Mobility minded redevelopment of Cincinnati’s historic OTR district A thesis submitted to the: Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati In Partial Completion of the Requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture In The School of Architecture and Interior Design Of The College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning 2010 by Timothy Neely B.A. Columbia University, 2005 Committee Chairs: Nnamdi Elleh Aarati Kanekar i ii Abstract The personal mobility of the automobile undermines the gathering of people in cities as centers of collective amenity. The isolation of auto traffic is reflected in buildings surrounded by parking with no detail at the human scale. Asphalt infrastructure characterizes the public space of the street with such a universal sameness that large parts of the city seem generic and placeless. The potential introduction of a streetcar for the city of Cincinnati presents the occasion to design policy and built work that promote public life and the activation of public space. The neighborhood of Over-the-Rhine provides a unique setting to address the return of urban space to more pedestrian friendly scale as these buildings weren’t designed for the speed and isolation of the car.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Wake Me for the End of the World Unless It Has Very Good
    02 Design for the Apocalypse John McMorrough DOn’t wAKE ME Invoking the “apocalypse” brings forth connotations of the end of the world - historically imagined as 16 17 everything from the judgment of God to nuclear Armageddon. In its contemporary manifestation it has taken the form of various global crises; whether environmental, economic, or the unexpected. Of course, the “end of the world” is not a novelty; it has its own history and is itself a genre of expression as a category of pessimism. A recurrent theme, it is the shadow of the progressive ideal of the avant-garde. It seems that at this juncture, FOR THE END OF utopia, that place of high aspirations and lofty ambition, has been the motivating conceit for a society (and an architecture) of aspirational perfection for quite some time, but across the spectrum of culture there has been a recent turn from the utopian to the apocalyptic, in forms both fictional and factual. With the intermingling of the improbable and the prosaic (think Katrina and The Day After Tomorrow, or 9/11 and Children of Men), the con- sideration of the apocalyptic is no longer a matter of fantasy,1 but of policy (one recently referred to as “disaster capitalism”).2 What we see in this latest manifestation is not merely the conservative position describing a fall from grace, or the entropic decline of systems and the diminishment of quality over time, but a description of a 3 THE WORLD UNLESS new prevalent condition. If Utopia is an unattainable goal, a literal no place, then the apocalypse is everyplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing Cities for People and the Planet
    Reinventing Cities for People and the Planet MOLLY O'MEARA Jane A. Peterson, Editor WORLDWATCH PAPER 147 June 1999 THE WORLDWATCH mSTITUTE is an independent, nonprofit envi- ronmental research organization in Washington, DC. Its mission is to foster a sustainable society in which human needs are met in ways that do not threaten the health of the natural environment or future generations. To this end, the Institute conducts interdisciplinary research on emerging glob- al issues, the results of which are published and disseminated to decision- makers and the media. FINANCIAL SUPPORT for the Institute is provided by the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, W. Alton Jones Foundation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Curtis and Edith Munson Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation, Rockefeller Financial Services, Summit Foundation, Turner Foundation, U.N. Population Fund, Wallace Genetic Foundation, Wallace Global Fund, Weeden Foundation, and the Winslow Foundation. The Institute also receives financial support from its Council of Sponsors members-Tom and Cathy Crain, Toshishige Kurosawa, Kazuhiko Nishi, Roger and Vicki Sant, Robert Wallace, and Eckart Wintzen- and from the Friends of Worldwatch. THE WORLDWATCH PAPERS provide in-depth, quantitative and quali- tative analysis of the major issues affecting prospects for a sustainable soci- ety. The Papers are written by members of the Worldwatch Institute research staff and reviewed by experts in the field. Published in five languages, they have been used as concise and authoritative references by governments, nongovernmental organizations, and educational institutions worldwide. For a partial list of available Papers, see back pages.
    [Show full text]
  • People in Planning
    People in Planning Saul Alinsky—advocacy planning; vision of planning centered on community organizing; Back of the Yards movement; Rules for Radicals (1971). William Alonso—land rent curve; bid-rent theory (1960): cost of land, intensity of development, and concentration of population decline as you move away from CBD. Sherry Arnstein—wrote Ladder of Participation (1969), which divided public participation and planning into three levels: non-participation, tokenism, and citizen power. Harland Bartholomew—first full-time municipally employed planner, St. Louis (1913); developed many early comprehensive plans. Edward Bassett—authored 1916 New York City zoning code. Edward Bennett—plan for San Francisco (1904); worked with Burnham on 1909 plan of Chicago. Alfred Bettman—authored first comprehensive plan: Cincinnati (1925); filed amicus curiae brief in support of Euclid and comprehensive zoning; first president of ASPO. Ernest Burgess—Concentric ring theory (1925)—urban areas grow in a series of concentric rings outward from CBD. Daniel Burnham—City Beautiful movement; White City at 1893 Columbian Exposition in Chicago; 1909 plan for Chicago, which applied principles of monumental city design and City Beautiful movement. Rachel Carson—brought attention to the negative effects of pesticides on the environment with her book Silent Spring (1962). F. Stuart Chapin—wrote Urban Land Use Planning (1957), a common textbook on land use planning. Paul Davidoff—father of advocacy planning; argued planners should not be value- neutral public servant, but should represent special interest groups. Peter Drucker—created ‘management by objectives’ (MBO), a management process whereby the superior and subordinate jointly identify their common goals, define each individual's major areas of responsibility in terms of the results expected of him, and use these measures as guides for operating the unit and assessing the contribution of each of its members.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Midtown Motion Link
    1. MIDTOWN MOTION LINK “Culture fosters connections, both expected and unexpected, creating more opportunities for residents and visitors to collaborate, communicate and realize meaningful relationships. A powerful medium, culture also fortifies neighborhoods, instills civic pride and shapes collective identity through the sharing of experiences, story, memory, and creativity.” -Creative Strategies 360º, Culture Connects Santa Fe – A Cultural Cartography (2016) The site is located in the physical center of the City of Santa Fe and as such has opportunity to become a dynamic node for Santa Fe and to revitalize the former campus area as well as the surrounding urban fabric. It is important the new center celebrate the rich history of Santa Fe and reflects in a new way the unique identity of the City Different. Inspired by the Culture Connects initiative created by the City of Santa Fe in 2016, the new center should be inclusive. It should be a dense, vibrant and easily accessed destination for residents and tourists, with a variety of programs and uses to attract people across all demographic categories (age, race, economic strata, cultural identity and gender). As a dense magnet of spaces and activities at the geographic core of Santa Fe, it will also serve as a transportation link addressing motion of pedestrians, bicycles, and motorized vehicles including cars, scooters, buses, motorcycles, etc. The focus on motion is both literal and figurative in that a successful city or mixed use neighborhood is always changing, perhaps growing, but certainly evolving. As a cultural hub, there will be motion of ideas, events, activities and relationships which will be reflected in the physical fabric of the area in subtle, or perhaps grand, ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Politics: Resource Scarcity and Libertarian Political Culture in the United States
    Peak Politics: Resource Scarcity and Libertarian Political Culture in the United States A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Matthew Schneider-Mayerson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Elaine Tyler May, Adviser June 2013 © Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, 2013 Acknowledgements First and foremost, many thanks to the wonderful members of my committee, Elaine Tyler May, Lary May, Daniel J. Philippon, Kevin P. Murphy and David N. Pellow. Elaine and Lary were dedicated mentors throughout graduate school, even when they—and often I—had little idea exactly what I was studying, or why. Lary’s emphasis on the “so what” question reminded me that my research should always be relevant, while Elaine’s consistent support, insight, and warmth were invaluable. Their monthly dissertation group provided the kind of intellectual community that one seeks but rarely finds as one enters graduate school, and having regular take-out Chinese food made me, a Jew from New York City, feel right at home in the Midwest. Dan Philippon was a mentor in my environmental pursuits and provided generous feedback and advice on this and other projects that was incredibly thoughtful and detailed. David Pellow agreed to join at a late stage and always provoked me to consider new angles. Kevin Murphy guided my research into conservatism and masculinity and was a model of sustaining kindness and warmth. Thanks to the University of Minnesota for its financial support, especially in the form of a Graduate Student Fellowship my first year and a Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship this last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Community Across the Rural-To-Urban Transect [The Transect]
    Peer Reviewed Title: Building Community across the Rural-to-Urban Transect [The Transect] Journal Issue: Places, 18(1) Author: Bohl, Charles C Plater-Zyberk, Elizabeth Publication Date: 2006 Publication Info: Places Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1zt6g0sr Acknowledgements: This article was originally produced in Places Journal. To subscribe, visit www.places-journal.org. For reprint information, contact [email protected]. Keywords: places, placemaking, architecture, environment, landscape, urban design, public realm, planning, design, Charles Bohl, Plater-Zyberk, building, community, transect, rural Copyright Information: All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more at http://www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. Building Community across the Rural-to-Urban Transect Charles C. Bohl with Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk Eighty percent of everything ever built in America has been built in the last fifty years, and most of it is depressing, brutal, ugly, unhealthy and spiritually degrading. — James Howard Kunstler, The Geography of Nowhere1 In 2030, about half of the buildings in which Ameri- cans live, work and shop will have been built after 2000. While these projections may seem overwhelming, they also demonstrate that
    [Show full text]