Is There a Relation Between Sleeping Habits and Nocturnal Bruxism

Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. soitdwt le rgetto.Hwvr orlto a on ihtamtcdna injuries. dental traumatic significantly with found found was also relation was no caries However, dental fragmentation. Untreated sleep with disorders. associated temporomandibular and bruxism, bruxism nocturnal nocturnal of presence and child. by setting each completed Results: clinical for was a recorded (CSHQ) in were out Questionnaire TDI carried Habits of was Sleep examination history Children’s oral Intra 6-13. between parents. aged their children hundred a to of (TMD), was children. study disorders in this temporomandibular caries of Methods: dental bruxism, aim and The habits, (TDI) well. sleeping injuries as between dental findings traumatic association oral possible with association the possible evaluate a demonstrate reports Recently Aim: disor- temporomandibular children? bruxism, among ABSTRACT nocturnal caries and and habits trauma sleeping dental between ders, relation order a in disorders there and Is habits sleeping of features clinical system. Pediatricians and stomatognathic characteristics. causes on and identify effects habits had to negative sleeping who avoid collaboration their to in children on bruxism, work impacts of with symptoms negative should with related experience pedodontists Children recorded might significantly and sleep Conclusion: caries were found with dental injuries. TDI associated was untreated dental significantly of traumatic and resistance found with history TMD found also time was bruxism, was relation caries bed nocturnal no dental However, of habits, Untreated representative fragmentation. presence sleeping disorders. a and temporomandibular Among with and setting bruxism Dentistry clinical Results: parents. nocturnal of their a Faculty by child. in completed IAU was each out association (CSHQ) at carried possible Questionnaire for out Habits was the Sleep in carried examination evaluate Children’s caries was oral to 6-13. dental study between Intra was and aged cross-sectional study children (TDI) hundred A this a injuries of of dental Methods: sample aim traumatic and The (TMD), Material disorders well. temporomandibular children. as reports bruxism, Recently findings habits, development. oral and sleeping growth with on between impact association negative possible a have a and children demonstrate among common are disorders Sleep Objective: Abstract 2021 5, February 3 2 1 Sabuncuoglu Osman Ak Topaloglu Asli among caries bruxism, children? and nocturnal trauma and dental habits disorders, sleeping temporomandibular between relation a there Is amr nvriySho fMedicine of School University Marmara available not Affiliation Universitesi Aydin Istanbul le iodr r omnaogcide n aeangtv mato rwhaddevelopment. and growth on impact negative a have and children among common are disorders Sleep mn leighbt,bdtm eitnewsfudsgicnl eae ihcide h had who children with related significantly found was resistance time bed habits, sleeping Among rs-etoa td a are u tIUFclyo etsr iharpeettv sample representative a with Dentistry of Faculty IAU at out carried was study cross-sectional A 1 uei Kurtulmus Huseyin , 3 2 iabasa sila , 1 2 eg Zorlu Sevgi , 2 zeCnKolcu Can Ozge , 2 and , Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. eainwt rxs,td d n etlcre r nsoeo eerhr’itrs.Teeoe h aim between temporomandibular the aged children bruxism, Therefore, in habits, CSHQ interest. through sleeping researchers’ caries between dental of and association years. scope (TDI) 6-13 possible injuries in dental the are dental traumatic evaluate cohort caries (TMD), of was disorders A dental frequency study the and increase nights. this tdi might of at tmd, This bruxism, sleep skills. well. with from motor as relation awakening and are incidence level to caries bruxers attention incidence. dental lead child the with trauma also Notably, impacts associated quality was can sleep time crucial. which bed poor are caries late adversely. ups that dental quality follow revealed sleep is study and the system pattern diagnosis affects stomatognathic sleeping which early the sleep affect Hence in fragmented have stability negatively. to of sleep reported prevention and the cause to life may dysfunction. leads of This of discomfort presence system. of the the stomatognathic perception with in the terror, The structures related in sleep term. and/or imbalance joint apnea, long an temporomandibular sleep including to disorders, as lead musculoskeletal heterogeneous may such International bruxism sleep the nocturnal in to Exacerbated occur according that bruxism. parasomnia problems and and enuresis behavioral sleepwalking, dyssomnia indicates the are parasomnia as (ICSD). whereas questionnaires Disorders mainly and Sleep of defined instruments Classification are and techniques disorders difficulties. instrument sleep-related reliable many Sleeping and and valid child habits parent-proxy a a sleep is children’s of (CSHQ) investigates Questionnaire that habits Habits Sleep These sleeping Children’s development. The alone. identify neurological sleep available. to to and inability emotional order to physical, In sleep socio-cultural, dis- fragmented the sleep and with Yet, delayed associated bedtime, child. health. all to a general are on resistance of effects development from adverse vary and possible avoid may growth to habits the prudently adolescence. pediatricians on through and effect infancy parents, by from important detected children an in has common sleep are that orders noted well is It disor- temporomandibular children? bruxism, among INTRODUCTION nocturnal caries integrate and and must habits problems. of trauma pediatricians health sleeping aware dental Likewise, oral between be ders, related relation sleep. should sleep a of dentists avoid there quality Pediatric and Is the treat cases. caries affect diagnose, dental pulpitis can to untreated dentists acute symptoms with pediatric seconder finding, with associated and oral from bruxism that be rising nocturnal fact to mostly to related the found pain be is severe temporo- to fragmentation of to found symptoms is sleep due and resistance Furthermore, time bruxism Bed sleep symptoms. with well. TMD associated as children are in habits disorders sleeping in mandibular the sleep confirms inadequate study present to The leading add? fragmentation article sleep this to does related What popula- be adult to in disorders found temporomandibular was and presence children. bruxism caries with Dental associated been tion. have of topic? problems this Sleeping about known children already avoid caries, is to dental What injuries, order dental in traumatic disorders malocclusion, and disorders, temporomandibular habits sleeping work of should Keywords: features pedodontists clinical system. and stomatognathic and Pediatricians on causes effects characteristics. identify negative and to habits collaboration sleeping in their on impacts negative Conclusion: leighbt,Sepdsres hlrnsSepHbt usinar CH) bruxism, (CSHQ), Questionnaire Habits Sleep Children’s disorders, Sleep habits, Sleeping hlrnwt yposo rxs,TDadutetddna aismgtexperience might caries dental untreated and TMD bruxism, of symptoms with Children (16,17) osdrn le rbesaecmo ntepdarcpplto,ispotential its population, pediatric the in common are problems sleep Considering (9-11) (3) hscrncdsre n aiu sacniinta ffcsquality affects that condition a is fatigue and disorder chronic This (8) ysmi ensiaeut,ecsieo orqaiyo sleep of quality poor or excessive inadequate, defines Dyssomnia 2 (1-3) (7) leighbt n atrssol be should patterns and habits Sleeping (12-14) n te atrta can that factor other One (15) iecanreaction, chain Like (5,6) (4) Sleeping Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ttsial infiatrlto ewe hlrnwt M iodrsmtm n e ieresistance time bed (Table-3) and (p=0.04) of symptoms noted. presence disorder was TMJ The disorder with behavior children sleep (Table-2) resistance. and between (p=0.02) bedtime (p=0.02) difficulties relation bedtime significant and had statistically bruxism who A between child significantly in relation was higher significant bruxism significantly was found of statistically (Table-1) bruxism was presence a (p<0,05). relation The symptoms was significant disorder A There symptoms. TMJ had 9%. TMD who the was and with individuals symptoms bruxism insignificant in disorder found nocturnal higher TMJ was with Gender of prevalence children bruxism. The among nocturnal had bruxism. children other of their and presence that (21%) fathers reported by parents included followed were of parents (76%), 40% their mothers and by criteria represented inclusion were the parents met (3%). these who of relatives male) Most 45 study. and female this (55 in patients 100 of total tests, A the of level significance accepted. the “Monte For Chi were the Statistics RESULTS with value and analysis. SPSS made Test <0.01 the was Exact IBM p in evaluation 20%, frequencies Fisher’s and than these by <0.05 2017. less include analyzed p are Released to were frequencies Method” Data expected Simulation the Corp. Corp.) where Carlo (IBM cases IBM In 25 NY: test. Armonk, SPSS Square using 25.0. Version conducted Windows, was for analysis statistical The malocclusion. overbite, Analysis bite, as Statistical open noted anterior as overjet, also encoded of was presence were crossbite and tmj) spacing, Classification in Angle crowding, irregularities to according condyle-disc movements, recorded muscles, mandibular was masticatory in Occlusion or being limitation / (not and and stiffness pain symptoms tmj muscle dislocation, serious the 2’. muscles, or 1’and of ‘Grade locking the ‘Grade area jaw in as much, the Lack fatigue encoded too in of mouth were pain index. the (feeling disorders) pain-dysfunction open muscular symptoms to masticating clinical mild able pain, 0’, and or ‘Grade anamnestic / as Helkimo and encoded examined to were were according symptoms tissues rated of soft examination, was adjacent TMJ examination and included injuries. TMJ teeth setting. dental examination incisor clinical traumatic clinical a of and The in findings Canines bias clinical inter-operator criteria. for malocclusion. avoid recorded WHO and to was using order Classification week injury in recorded Angle dental a operator were traumatic times one lesions of by 2-4 done Carious history for were and as ‘sometimes’ examinations bruxism oral week, coded of Intra a were Presence times Frequencies week. four a than week. well. time resistance, more as previous 0-1 bedtime occured options for the behavior response ‘rarely’ subjects: Habit occurred three specified and main Sleep conditions has the four item investigated Children’s if Each in the through ‘usually’ segmented sleepiness. often report daytime is how and proxy It fragmentation regarding parent sleep questions. through problems, 33 behavior collected has sleep oral were that intra/extra habits (CSHQ) fixed/removable sleeping Questionnaire diseases, on obtained. was systemic data consent included Written The criteria cooperation. of exclusion Aydın lack Istanbul controls The routine and to their referred appliance for treatment. who parents their old dental with years Dentistry or Pediatric 6-13 of Declaration between Department aged Dentistry Association of children Faculty Medical University 100 World involved the study with cross-sectional compliance This full University in Aydın Istanbul out the carried Helsinki. of was Committee of Ethics study Research The Human the by (2020/169). approved was protocol study The METHODS 3 Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. a eatiue olmtdsml size. orthodontic sample Turkish in limited malocclusion to seen attributed frequently most be 98%. among the may was to 62% I 39% Class found published from that was been ranging reporting population. have prevalence al., malocclusion studies et reported begin Numerous of Sayin with they with (79%). prevalence malocclusion line level, relationship the of molar certain study, prevalence frequent a most the present reach the on the was conflicts I In occlusal Class as and not changes. such children, were factors textural symptoms with produce occur TMD to that that sleep. changes disturbed reported functional and When al., distress TMD et psychological have with Cheifetz to associated likely findings, significantly more our were were to resistance bruxism. contrast time with with bed associated symptoms In disorders with TMJ Children symptoms. between bruxism. relationship disorder significant and statistically and a characteristics and was sleeping children there opening. study, in present limited prevalence the and TMD In opening study. on present pain the tenderness, in muscle 68%. symptoms , al. to disorder et of 16 TMJ Oner from presence children. vary showed finding, in The adolescents children this bruxism to the habits. nocturnal parallel of sleeping with In 9% with associated difficulties. was associated bedtime quality be had sleep who to that child found reported in was higher bruxism significantly was bruxism. nocturnal sleep bruxism study, possible Moreover, toward present bruxism. tendency bruxism. the an sleep nocturnal have In with to possible reported with associated were for associated found chronotype signals be evening also with to important was children found are young were fragmentation breathing nightmares Sleep mouth and agitation and children. Nocturnal snoring in pains, bruxism Muscle sleep hereditary. detecting is bruxism sleep Potential gender. and different bruxism to sleep of attributed females. be than brux can to show girls. variations among than these boys assessments. prevalance accurate more and for bruxism 49.6%, required However are bruxism. to criteria diagnostic for 5.9% 40%. used from found vary criteria was bruxism diagnostic sleep bruxism of pattern. sleep rates fluctuating of studies. a epidemiological prevalence displays in study, children use present for objective the sufficiently psychiatry In and both in reliable screening used be translated frequently and to are was habits parents reports questionnaire parents’ sleep of on assessing This based practices. for scales pediatric self-report, instrument colletion. and child’s reliable the data The a from for differ be may children. well. Turkish used to of was as reported problems sleep and CSHQ dentists interest. possible validated research of but and of Version dental Turkish pediatricians area Turkish and to major only study, bruxism a not this TDI, holds still of malocclusion, In and problems, focus recently TMJ investigated the possible been in have and caries habits are sleeping children between of betweenrelationships habits found was sleeping Today, relation significant Angle no to However, according III DISCUSSION 22%. Class was >0.05) %10 injury (p and dental characteristics. habits. II sleeping traumatic sleeping significantly the Class of between found prevalence %11 found also The I, relation was significant Class no caries %79 was (Table-4) of was There (p=0.001) presence relationship Classification. fragmentation. The molar sleep and permanent nights 98%. The at was sleep caries from awakening dental with untreated associated of prevalance The (26) oee,n infiatrlto a on ewe aocuinadsepn aiswhich habits sleeping and malocclusion between found was relation significant no However, (20) (11) (19) (11) ntesuyb hieze l,teewsas rn o ae ob oelikely more be to males for trend a also was there al., et Cheifetz by study the In oee,i h rsn td osgicn eainwsfudbtenpresence between found was relation significant no study present the in However, ti oeotyta,Aeia cdm fSepMdcn osdr h reports the considers Medicine Sleep of Academy American that, noteworthy is It oee,orfidnswr nln ihLie l htrpre M symptoms TMD reported that al. et Lei with line in were findings our However, (22) oty td ouain’sbetv M yposwr a clicking jaw were symptoms TMD subjective populations’ study Mostly, (9) (4,9,11,20) hrfr,eiec-ae tde ihsadrie n validated and standardized with studies evidence-based Therefore, (18) lhuhteeaevroscnen htprn’ notifications parent’s that concerns various are there Although nasseai eiwb ahd ta. h prevalence the al., et Machado by review systematic a In 4 (9) (11) naae l eotdta le rxs affected bruxism sleep that reported al. et Insana (23) (21) (8) (24,25) (15-17) u euti in is result Our (30) (29) Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. uhr ol iet hn sablAdnUiest etlFclysa o hi upr n special and analysis. support statistical in their assistance for his staff for Faculty Tekindal Dental Agah REFERENCES University Mustafa Aydin Prof Istanbul Assoc. thank to thanks to like would possible Authors prevent to order in disorders sleeping sleep ACKNOWLEGMENTS should of children. between dentists features in however, clinical pediatric damages found, and dental and was causes and Pediatricians correlation identify oral injuries. to significant partnership dental No and in traumatic disorders work and 6-13. temporomandibular between malocclusion bruxism, and aged with characteristics children associated significantly in were caries habits dental sleeping problems. study, health this oral In related sleep avoid the preventing and in collecting treat parents diagnose, when CONCLUSION to to obtained and orientation factor pedodontists behaviors better key paediatricians, a sleep the with for on integration is useful Consequently, psychiatrics data be disorders. manner, can temporomandibular appointment this and dental bruxism In a diagnostic before methodological findings. prevalence other history using these disorders patient’s research sample confirm temporomandibular scientific in large and to investigated and bruxism be methods should reliable higher samples for and sleep data that problems suggests collect sleep to between method relationship the appropriate the The recognizing most of by night. the occurs role at is it The it teeth cause study, of study.studies. parents. bruxism this this grinding nocturnal of in in the pediatric judgment subjective data by of are subjective the diagnosis produced the interpreting the sounds on when in characteristic based important considered evaluated very be was is should bruxism family limitations reports. and various previous disorders that with Sleep noted line in be inevitable. also should is is It which sleep study of present Turkey fragmentation the dental in in and traumatic fragmentation care of school health prevalence of the oral with ing unmet associated the behavior reflects caries. sleep traumatic unfortunately higher of dental a aspect and with main associated injuries the was is sleep, agitated sleepiness accident. of Daytime the indication an before is night prevalence. which motor the night, injury affect hours next at dental 10 can the times concentration four than children and to less in mood three slept person’s disorders children a Sleep when affect can overallincidences traumatic disorders. sleep the literature, night sleep previous al., bad with A on et day. Based associated concentration. Carvalho and study. by be cognition our study to skills, in school-children. a tended injuries in In dental injuries In traumatic %37.1 dental TMJ. 22%. and found of was disorders was tolerance sleep injury structural trauma between dental existing dental traumatic the of of change prevalence prevalence can habits the parafunctional study, and this traumas as such Factors Drua ,Pka ,¸opnBNgrSephbt n eae atr nknegre hlrn J children. kindergarten in factors related pa- and of habits Knowledge Sleep ¸Colpan LC. B.Niger S, Maia Pekcan Fonseca-Gon¸calves A, Child Y, JM, Acad Durduran Serra-Negra Am Psychiatry 5. IR, J Adolescent and Calabrio years. Child C, (Eds.), 10 Silva Myers past Tavares Cheng,KM the 4. K of disorders. review sleep a Pediatric in KP. Sleep disorders: Johnson Aires). sleep (B 3. Pediatric Medicina LA. AR. Torres Eiben K, TF, Astorga Rosso Anders T, 2. Latorre Mesa C, Allende Riffo M, Rana 1. (17) et/urin bu otra rxs ncide n dlset.Cai 07 54:223-227. Sep;22(9):1218-1223. 35(4): 2019 2017; Pract. Cranio Clin adolescents. and children in bruxism nocturnal about rents/guardians 2005. Wilkins, and Williams Lippincott Philadelphia, 25-28. Essentials, 3: The Suppl 79 2019; Aires) 36:9-20. (B 1997; Medicina Psychiatry review. Adolesc literature a of update and physiology children: twssae htsepdpiainwsascae ihacdna nuis 6 nraei trauma in increase 86% injuries; accidental with associated was deprivation sleep that stated was It (17,31) h rvlneo etlcre svr ihi h rsn td which study present the in high very is caries dental of prevalance The 5 (33) etlcre a on soitdwt sleep with associated found was caries Dental (32) usqety eadto ngot,miss- growth, in retardation Subsequently, (27) (4) hrfr,atog aet’answers parents’ although Therefore, osgicn orlto a found was correlation significant No (31,33) (28) nadto,wkn up waking addition, In Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. Isn P oa ,MNi W otoeyDwsH.Cmuiybsdsuyo le bruxism sleep of study based Community HE. Montgomery-Downs 21. DW, McNeil D, Gozal SP, quality health-related Insana children’s 20. their of proxy-report ¸Cocuk Parent TM. M. Burwinkle Berkem CA, R, Limbers Ersu JW, S, Varni Imren 19. Gokce G¨uler AS, A, Topuzoglu P, Ay A, Arman N, Fis Perdahlı 18. childhood of association The FM. Ferreira NBL, Rebellato FC, sleep- Fraiz ADHD, BL, Cavalcante-Leao SRB, malocclusion, Todero breastfeeding, inci- 17. between caries relationships dental the and Understanding bedtime O. of Late Sabuncuoglu symptoms JM. 16. Goodson subjective E, of Al-Ozairi study F, longitudinal Al-Mulla M, 20-year Tavares A H, Alqaderi T. their Magnusson 15. and adolescents GE, Asian Carlsson in symptoms I, disorders Egermark Temporomandibular KY. 14. Fu AU, Yap J, Fu diagno- J, of Lei Prevalence JF. 13. Souza de JA, Brancher EM, Losso E, Pizzatto correlates CD, associated Bruzamolin FMP, and on Bertoli bruxism effect of Prevalence children: 12. HL. in Needleman Bruxism EM, SV. Alfred SK, Kothare Osganian A, AT, Chialastri Cheifetz D, 11. Metroka M, Grant I, Valencia M, Herrera 10. Crah L ossS,BeoR,SiauaS ossS.Agorpia ouainaayi of analysis population geographical A ST. Moyses S, Shimakura RE, Bueno SJ, Moyses popu- malocclusion, Turkish ML, of referred Carvalho orthodontically Prevalence 27. an R. in crowding Valletta and A, Malocclusion T¨urkkahraman H. MO, Michelotti Sayin S, 26. Martina V, Simeon R, Bucci malocclu- S, with associated Perrotta factors 25. Environmental LL. Vaida their AI, and Lucan adolescents L, Todor Asian I, in Scrobota symptoms dys- BI, disorders Todor temporomandibular Temporomandibular KY. of 24. Fu Prevalence AU, Yap KV. J, Serrano Fu FW, J, Silva Lei FR, 23. Santos KS, Mesquita MF, Sena 22. McaoE a-aboC uaiP,Kie B rvlneo le rxs ncide:asystematic a children: in bruxism sleep of Prevalence Dia- OB. Revised: Kaizer PA, Disorders, Cunali C, Sleep Dal-Fabbro E, of Machado Classification 9. International psychometric Association. (CSHQ): Disorders Questionnaire Habits Sleep Sleep American Children’s 8. The M. Subpopulations McGuinn Two A, in Spirito JA, Questionnaire Owens Habits 7. Sleep Children’s R. Ferreira P, Fonseca IM, Carneiro 6. uigerycidod le e.21;1() 183-188. Y, 14(2): PedsQL Barut 2013; the P, Med. using Oner Sleep subgroups 5:2-11. childhood. age 2007; early across Outcomes during validity Life and Qual reliability Health parents’ Scales. 13,878 Core of Generic analysis 4.0 an life: of 151-160. T¨urk¸ce Alı¸skanlıkları Anketinin 2019; Uyku 11: Traumatol Ge¸cerlili˘gi 2010; Dent G¨uvenilirli˘gi. Dergisi schoolchildren. ve Psikiyatri in Anadolu injury dental traumatic 41-47. of 35(1): prevalence 315-320. the 80: with 2013; problems Hypotheses sleep Medical injuries. dental traumatic and 2020 breathing disordered Epidemiol. Oral Dent analysis.Community multilevel longitudinal 40-48. A 59(1): Jun;48(3):181-187. children: 2001; Kuwaiti Scand. in Odontol dence Acta adulthood. to childhood 242-249. from 34(4): disorders 2016; temporomandibular Cranio. distress. psychological and quality sleep 2018; with One. association PLoS adolescents. Brazilian in study cross-sectional e0192254. 13(2): A 67-73. 72: disorders: 2005; temporomandibular Child. sed Dent J parents. by 1143-1148. reported 29: as 2006; children Sleep. in behavior. and performance cognitive daytime and architecture sleep 54-61. 19(6): 2014; Orthod. J 1997. Press Association, Dental Disorders review. Sleep American MN, Rochester, Manual. 15:1043-1051. Coding 2000; and Sleep gnostic children. schoolaged for instrument Oct survey 2019 a Port. of Med properties Acta Analysis. Regression and Exploratory Mozambique: 1;32(10):628-634. and Verde Cape from ain nl rhd 2004;74(5):635-639. Orthod. Angle lation. 611-616. 46(7): epidemiological 2019; An Rehabil. schoolchildren: Oral Italian Health. J in disorder-pain Public study. temporomandibular Res and Environ parafunctions J oral Int Romania. Western Areas, Mining from 2019;16(18):3383. population 34(4):242-249. children in 2016: Cranio sion distress. psychological and 538-545. quality 31(4): sleep 2013; with association Pediatr. Paul Rev adolescents. and children in function 382-395. 19(4): 2009; Bulteni G¨uvenirli˘gi.Ge¸cerlik Psikofarmakol ve Klinik ¨ Oner ¨ O, ¨ Uneri ¨ ¸ ,Bdr¸,Tru ,MnrK.¸Cocuklarda Uyku KM. Munir S, ¸S, Turgut O¸S, Bodur ¨ 6 Ol¸ce˘gi’nin ¨ Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. Asgicn eainwsfudaogcide ihncunlbuimadTDsmtm p<0,05). symptoms TMD and bruxism nocturnal with children among found was relation significant *A trauma dental malocclusion, Classification, caries Angle dental TMD, and and bruxism nocturnal between Association Table-1 *p<0,05 Ae ,BraeE abhWFml mat fSvr etlCre mn hlrni h United the in Children discussion among Caries Turkey–a Dental in Severe of children Impacts W.Family in Sabbah caries E, Bernabe dental R, Managing Abed JE. 33. Frencken E, Eden Caries Dental A, of Topaloglu-Ak Incidence and 32. Sleep Insufficient KJ. Kawakami Fonseca- S, Yoshida JM, K, Serra-Negra Arai S, S, Tanaka Paiva H, Chen RR, Luiz 31. L, sleep Costa possible between C, Tavares-Silva Association D, IA. Manfredini Pordeus MB, SM, Pediatrics. Paiva Ribeiro injury. IM, 30. childhood Prado and MB, sleep Ribeiro of JM, study case-crossover Serra-Negra A 29. F. Barbone S, Brusaferro F, Valent 28. etlcre on2021310,243 100 1,361 2 0,278 40 1,175 0,178 1,811 78 0 38 0,289 60 2,645 n 0,015* 29 5,881 Total 79 2 12 91 n Total No 49 32 n caries Dental 26 33 No n Trauma Dental No 47 n Malocclusion 58 I Class n No Angle TMD igo.ItJEvrnRsPbi elh 09Dc22;17(1):109. Dec 2019 Health. Public Res Environ J Int 2018 Kingdom. 25;9:32. Nov Pediatr. 2009 Study. Health. Oral Cohort BMC Population-Based paper. A Japan: in chronotype Children different among Jul;198:279-286.e5. with Teeth children Deciduous in May;35(5):633-642. in bruxism 2018 sleep Int. Chronobiol possible characteristics. of sleep Association and LC. profiles Maia Sep;35(5):315-320. A, 2017 Goncalves Cranio. children. in characteristics sleep and bruxism Res. Serv Health BMC 23-29. Brazil. 107: Curitiba- 2001; of city the in 15 203-210. and 10: 12 aged 2010; schoolchildren in trauma dental e 84 98 22 40 62 11 10 11 58 28 n 9 11 Yes n 2 6 34 Yes n 7 Yes 8 n 5 III Class n II 2 Class n Yes 00%4,0 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 40,00% 100,00% 40,80% 100,00% 0,00% 100,00% 60,00% 50,00% % 100,00% 59,20% 37,20% % 100,00% 100,00% 45,20% % 100,00% 50,00% 31,60% % 100,00% 62,80% 20,00% % 100,00% 54,80% 54,50% % 100,00% 68,40% 40,50% % 80,00% 77,80% % 45,50% 36,30% % 59,50% % 22,20% % 63,70% % oYes Total Bruxism No Nocturnal Bruxism Nocturnal 7 χ 2 p Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. oa oa 04 100 40 0,086 0,080 85 60 0,811 n Total 0,020* 98 97 66 31 38 39 21 54 n Total 60 No n 58 Sleepiness up/Daytime wake to Unable n 45 No n No fragmentation night-Sleep No at up Waking Problem Behavior Sleep Resistance Time Bed oa oa 19100 9 0,732 91 0,041* n 85 Total 0,580 * 0,024 98 sleep 97 and resistance time bed and 66 symptoms TMD 8 with children among found p<0,05 was behaviour relation significant symptoms A TMD * and habits 8 sleeping between Association Table-3 9 9 77 n Total 90 No n 88 Sleepiness up/Daytime wake to Unable n 57 No n No fragmentation night-Sleep No at up Waking Problem Behavior Sleep Resistance Time Bed p<0,05 resistance time bed and bruxism nocturnal with children among found was relation significant bruxism A nocturnal * and habits sleeping between Association Table-2 e 15 3 9 2 1 34 6 2 n Yes 2 19 n Yes 0 n Yes 15 n Yes e 4115 3 1 2 0 34 14 n 1 Yes 3 n 0 Yes 1 n Yes 34 n Yes 00%4,0 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 40,00% 100,00% 60,00% 100,00% 36,50% 100,00% 60,00% 33,30% % 100,00% 40,00% 40,20% % 100,00% 63,50% 100,00% % 100,00% 66,70% 38,80% % 59,80% 55,90% % 0,00% 31,80% % 61,20% % 44,10% % 68,20% % 10%90%100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 9,00% 100,00% 6,70% 100,00% 9,40% 91,00% % 100,00% 93,30% 0,00% 100,00% % 9,30% 90,60% % 100,00% 50,00% 100,00% % 100,00% 8,20% 90,70% % 50,00% 0,00% % 13,60% 91,80% % 100,00% % 86,40% % 8 rsneAbsence p Total Bruxism Presence Nocturnal Bruxism Nocturnal oYes Total symptoms No TMD symptoms TMD Posted on Authorea 5 Feb 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161248773.39963283/v1 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. dental-trauma-and-caries-among-children relation-between-sleeping-habits-and-nocturnal-bruxism-temporomandibular-disorders- table-4.pdf file Hosted dental-trauma-and-caries-among-children relation-between-sleeping-habits-and-nocturnal-bruxism-temporomandibular-disorders- table-3.pdf file Hosted dental-trauma-and-caries-among-children relation-between-sleeping-habits-and-nocturnal-bruxism-temporomandibular-disorders- table-2.pdf file Hosted dental-trauma-and-caries-among-children p<0,05 relation-between-sleeping-habits-and-nocturnal-bruxism-temporomandibular-disorders- resistance time bed table-1.pdf and caries dental with children file among Hosted found was relation significant caries A dental * and habits sleeping between Association Table-4 oa oa 8100 98 2 0,548 n Total 0,838 85 0,001** 0,629 98 97 83 66 96 96 2 65 n Total 2 No n 1 Sleepiness up/Daytime wake to Unable n 1 No n No fragmentation night-Sleep No at up Waking Problem Behavior Sleep Resistance Time Bed vial at available at available at available at available https://authorea.com/users/393881/articles/507377-is-there-a- https://authorea.com/users/393881/articles/507377-is-there-a- https://authorea.com/users/393881/articles/507377-is-there-a- https://authorea.com/users/393881/articles/507377-is-there-a- e 515 3 15 2 2 0 n 34 2 Yes 1 n 33 Yes 0 n Yes 1 n Yes ,0 80%100,00% 100,00% 98,00% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 2,00% 97,60% 100,00% % 0,00% 66,70% % 100,00% 2,40% 99,00% 100,00% % 33,30% 100,00% 100,00% % 1,00% 98,00% 100,00% % 0,00% 97,10% % 2,00% 98,50% % 2,90% % 1,50% % 9 oYes p Total Caries No Dental Caries Dental