DOCSLIB.ORG

Budget Request

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Budget Request DOE/CF-0113 Department of Energy FY 2016 Congressional Budget Request Budget in Brief February 2015 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0113 Department of Energy FY 2016 Congressional Budget Request Budget in Brief February 2015 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper FY 2016 BUDGET IN BRIEF TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Funding by Appropriation .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Funding by Organization ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Nuclear Security National Nuclear Security Administration ............................................................................................................................... 10 Weapons Activities ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Naval Reactors .................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Federal Salaries and Expenses ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Science and Energy ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Science ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ................................................................................................................................ 29 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ................................................................................................................................ 32 Fossil Energy Research and Development ............................................................................................................................... 35 Fossil Energy Petroleum Accounts ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Nuclear Energy ......................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs ........................................................................................................................... 42 Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy .......................................................................................................................... 43 Energy Information Administration ......................................................................................................................................... 44 Credit Programs Title 17 – Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program .............................................................................................. 45 Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program .......................................................................................... 46 Tribal Indian Energy Loan Guarantee Program .................................................................................................................. 47 Management and Performance Environmental Management ................................................................................................................................................... 48 Office of Legacy Management ................................................................................................................................................. 51 Office of Hearings and Appeals ................................................................................................................................................ 52 Departmental Administration .................................................................................................................................................. 53 Environment, Health, Safety and Security ..................................................................................................................................... 55 Enterprise Assessments ................................................................................................................................................................. 56 Office of the Inspector General ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 Power Marketing Administrations ................................................................................................................................................. 58 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ........................................................................................................................................ 60 Appendix Crosscutting Activities to Advance National Energy Goals ...................................................................................................... 62 Funding by Site ......................................................................................................................................................................... 71 OVERVIEW The Department of Energy (DOE) is entrusted with critical responsibilities for America’s security and prosperity: • Sustaining the nuclear deterrent without testing; in an age of global terrorism, advancing the President’s commitment to controlling and eliminating nuclear materials worldwide; supporting the Navy nuclear propulsion program • Enabling the transition to a low-carbon secure energy future, especially by developing low-cost, all-of-the-above energy technologies and a 21st century resilient energy infrastructure; • Providing the backbone for America’s research community, especially in the physical sciences, as the foundation for discovery and innovation; • Protecting public health and safety through a long term commitment to cleaning up the Cold War legacy from nuclear weapons production, and by developing and maintaining emergency response capabilities for nuclear and radiological incidents and energy infrastructure disruptions. The seventeen DOE national laboratories are core scientific and technical assets for carrying out these missions. DOE requests $29.9 billion for fiscal year (FY) 2016, an increase of $2.5 billion from the FY 2015 Enacted level. The domestic energy revolution is one of the great success stories of this new century. The economy is growing at the fastest pace in eleven years, with sustained job creation, in part because of energy. DOE programs have contributed to this revolution through continued progress in our understanding of the scientific foundations of energy sciences and technology; clean energy technological innovation and advanced manufacturing research and demonstration; credit support for early commercial deployments; and new technologies and standards to enhance end use energy efficiency. Yet major opportunities and challenges remain for continued technological innovation that reduces cost and enhances performance, for educating and training the workforce for tomorrow's energy economy, and for modernizing our domestic energy infrastructure for the 21st century economy. The DOE FY 2016 Budget Request includes $10.7 billion, an increase of $1.3 billion from the FY 2015 Enacted level, to address these challenges. The strategic framework for the budget proposals is provided by the Administration's all-of-the-above energy strategy and the President's Climate Action Plan, as described further in the Department's Strategic Plan. The Budget Request highlights new investments in energy infrastructure technology to improve the resilience of the electric grid and to reduce methane emissions from natural gas systems; supports state-level energy assurance planning; and funds maintenance of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and other critical energy infrastructure. These efforts will be further delineated in the Quadrennial Energy Review to be released in early 2015. The Request also strengthens DOE’s world- leading discovery research in the physical, chemical, biological, environmental, and computational sciences. The FY 2016 Budget Request also supports six crosscutting research initiatives, acknowledging that multi-disciplinary, cross-program activities are needed to adequately address our energy challenges. These enterprise-wide approaches to research efforts will produce more effective outcomes and broaden the potential for material impacts on our energy and security goals. The FY 2016 Budget Request for nuclear security is $12.6 billion for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an increase of $1.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navy Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 14, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Navy’s Columbia (SSBN-826) class ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new SSBNs to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. Since 2013, the Navy has consistently identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy procured the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021 and wants to procure the second boat in the class in FY2024. The Navy’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $3,003.0 (i.e., $3.0 billion) in procurement funding for the first Columbia-class boat and $1,644.0 million (i.e., about $1.6 billion) in advance procurement (AP) funding for the second boat, for a combined FY2022 procurement and AP funding request of $4,647.0 million (i.e., about $4.6 billion). The Navy’s FY2022 budget submission estimates the procurement cost of the first Columbia- class boat at $15,030.5 million (i.e., about $15.0 billion) in then-year dollars, including $6,557.6 million (i.e., about $6.60 billion) in costs for plans, meaning (essentially) the detail design/nonrecurring engineering (DD/NRE) costs for the Columbia class. (It is a long-standing Navy budgetary practice to incorporate the DD/NRE costs for a new class of ship into the total procurement cost of the first ship in the class.) Excluding costs for plans, the estimated hands-on construction cost of the first ship is $8,473.0 million (i.e., about $8.5 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes
    US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 211 US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ORIGINS OF THE CARRIER AND THE SUPERCARRIER 5 t World War II Carriers t Post-World War II Carrier Developments t United States (CVA-58) THE FORRESTAL CLASS 11 FORRESTAL AS BUILT 14 t Carrier Structures t The Flight Deck and Hangar Bay t Launch and Recovery Operations t Stores t Defensive Systems t Electronic Systems and Radar t Propulsion THE FORRESTAL CARRIERS 20 t USS Forrestal (CVA-59) t USS Saratoga (CVA-60) t USS Ranger (CVA-61) t USS Independence (CVA-62) THE KITTY HAWK CLASS 26 t Major Differences from the Forrestal Class t Defensive Armament t Dimensions and Displacement t Propulsion t Electronics and Radars t USS America, CVA-66 – Improved Kitty Hawk t USS John F. Kennedy, CVA-67 – A Singular Class THE KITTY HAWK AND JOHN F. KENNEDY CARRIERS 34 t USS Kitty Hawk (CVA-63) t USS Constellation (CVA-64) t USS America (CVA-66) t USS John F. Kennedy (CVA-67) THE ENTERPRISE CLASS 40 t Propulsion t Stores t Flight Deck and Island t Defensive Armament t USS Enterprise (CVAN-65) BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS FORRESTAL, KITTY HAWK AND ENTERPRISE CLASSES INTRODUCTION The Forrestal-class aircraft carriers were the world’s first true supercarriers and served in the United States Navy for the majority of America’s Cold War with the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs June 29, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Columbia (SSBN-826) class program, previously known as the Ohio replacement program (ORP) or SSBN(X) program, is a program to design and build a new class of 12 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 Ohio-class SSBNs. The Navy has identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy wants to procure the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021. The Navy’s proposed FY2019 budget requests $3,005.3 million in advance procurement (AP) funding and $704.9 million in research and development funding for the program. The Navy as of January 2017 estimated the procurement cost of the lead ship in the class at $8.2 billion in constant 2017 dollars, not including several billion dollars in additional cost for plans for the class, and the average unit procurement cost of ships 2 through 12 in the program at $6.5 billion each in constant FY2017 dollars. An April 2018 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report assessing selected major DOD weapon acquisition programs stated that the estimated total acquisition cost of the Columbia-class program is $102,075.3 million (about $102.1 billion) in constant FY2018 dollars, including $12,901.0 million (about $12.9 billion) in research and development costs and $89,174.3 million (about $89.2 billion) in procurement costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated February 26, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Columbia (SSBN-826) class program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. The Navy has identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy wants to procure the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021. Research and development work on the program has been underway for several years, and advance procurement (AP) funding for the first boat began in FY2017. The Navy’s proposed FY2021 budget requests $2,891.5 million in procurement funding, $1,123.2 million in advance procurement (AP) funding, and $397.3 million in research and development funding for the program. The Navy’s FY2021 budget submission estimates the total procurement cost of the 12-ship class at $109.8 billion in then-year dollars. A May 2019 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report assessing selected major DOD weapon acquisition programs stated that the estimated total acquisition (development plus procurement) cost of the Columbia-class program as of June 2018 was $103,035.2 million (about $103.0 billion) in constant FY2019 dollars, including $13,103.0 million (about $13.1 billion) in research and development costs and $89,932.2 million (about $89.9 billion)
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Power to Stop British Fleeing
    NAVY / MARINE CORPS / COAST GUARD / MERCHANT MARINE SPECIAL REPORT: EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE June 2019 $5.00 NAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES www.navyleague.org SEA-AIR-SPACE 2019 ROUNDUP / DEFENSE BUDGET SHOWDOWN / ABOARD THE USS LEWIS B. PULLER THE SHAPE OF FREEDOM THE SHAPE OF FREEDOM The Shape of Freedom the shape of freedom Accelerating LPD Flight II will enhance naval capacity and lethality and bring a flexible, survivable and a ordable warship that our Navy-Marine Corps Team needs now. Accelerating this next generation warship helps provide distributed maritime capability, leverages a hot production line, and is an important and continued investment in a supplier base of 400 companies in 30 states. HUNTINGTONINGALLS.COM/LPD-FLIGHT-II PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Thank You! BY ALAN KAPLAN, NAVY LEAGUE NATIONAL PRESIDENT Thank you for the opportunity and honor of serving you. There have been many accomplishments that our headquarters and volunteer team can be proud of over the last two of years. Leading this charge has been such a privilege. Serving as your national president has been a humbling expe- rience, and working side by side with all of you, as we worked together diligently, as a team, to elevate our organization’s mission to new heights, has been an honor. Our Navy League is now an organization of action, but we are also good at listening. We pay very close attention to what our sea service leaders are saying. Their challenges and what they are focused on are equally important to us as we advocate and educate for their well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
    S. HRG. 109–130 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Department of Defense Appropriations Fiscal Year 2006 109th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2863 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of Defense Appropriations, 2006 (H.R. 2863) S. HRG. 109–130 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2863 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 99–854 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CONRAD BURNS, Montana HARRY REID, Nevada RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L.
    [Show full text]
  • New Navy Flattop Heralds Next Carrier Class
    Related Articles New Navy Flattop Heralds Next Carrier Class by Harold Kennedy At the mouth of the historic Chesapeake Bay-near the site of the nation's first English-speaking colony and several battles of the Revolutionary and Civil Wars-plans are being laid for a major centerpiece of U.S. naval power for the 21st century. The Newport News Shipbuilding company, of Newport News, Va., is under contract with the U.S. Navy to begin the design process for a new nuclear aircraft carrier-the last of the Nimitz class of ships, intended to last through the better part of the century ahead. The new carrier, known only as CVN 77, has yet to be named. Construction will not even begin until fiscal year 2001, with completion scheduled for 2008. Both Newport News and the Navy view CVN 77 as the bridge between the current Nimitz class and a whole new generation of carriers, known as CVNX. Thus, to a large extent, officials told National Defense, the fate of the 114-year-old Newport News shipyard and future U.S. naval clout may depend upon the success of this project. It may seem unlikely that so much could depend upon a single ship, they said, but a nuclear aircraft carrier is no ordinary ship. The firepower of just one U.S. carrier-with 80 heavily armed aircraft-is equal to that of the entire air force of many countries. "The first question any president asks during a crisis is: 'Where is the closest carrier?'" said Robert C. Klosterman, manager of the new Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier Integration Center, a joint effort between the state of Virginia, the city of Newport News and Newport News Shipbuilding.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
    Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard A Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health i Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard A Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard October 2004 i Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Disclaimer Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. Ordering Information To receive documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH at NIOSH—Publications Dissemination 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, Ohio 45226–1998 Telephone: 1–800–35–NIOSH (1–800–356–4675) Fax: 513–533–8573 E-mail: [email protected] or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh HHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-104 ii Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Preface Ionizing radiation and its sources are used every day in medical, industrial and governmental facilities around the world. Although some health risks from ionizing radiation exposures are widely recognized, the association of these exposures to specific diseases, especially various types of cancer, remains uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated November 10, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Columbia (SSBN-826) class program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. The Navy has identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy wants to procure the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021. Research and development work on the program has been underway for several years, and advance procurement (AP) funding for the first boat began in FY2017. The Navy’s proposed FY2021 budget requests $2,891.5 million (i.e., about $2.9 billion) in procurement funding, $1,123.2 million (i.e., about $1.1 billion) in advance procurement (AP) funding, and $397.3 million in research and development funding for the program. The Navy’s FY2021 budget submission estimates the procurement cost of the first Columbia- class boat at $14,393.4 million (i.e., about $14.4 billion) in then-year dollars, including $6,007.8 million (i.e., about $6.0 billion) in costs for plans, meaning (essentially) the detail design/non- recurring engineering (DD/NRE) costs for the Columbia class. (It is a longstanding Navy budgetary practice to incorporate the DD/NRE costs for a new class of ship into the total procurement cost of the first ship in the class.) Excluding costs for plans, the estimated hands-on construction cost of the first ship is $8,385.7 million (i.e., about $8.4 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • A Navy Family * STSCS Russell A
    I Any Day in the Navy ay 18, 1994, was like any other day in the photos that were shot on May 18th and sent in by hun- Navy. Sailors and Marines stood watches, dreds of our readers. There wasn’t really anything special steamed ships, trained and turnedto as part about May 18. It was just another day we were forward Mof the worldwide, forward-deployed naval deployed or supporting Sailors and Marines in the deploy- forcesteam. Although some Sailors and Marines went to mentcycle. work that day only minutes from home, others were at sea We didn’t necessarily pick the most artistic or dynamic and ashore thousands of miles and months away from their photos; we selected our photos to reflect the diverse families. activities our Sailors and Marines are involved in every day every ininvolved areMarines and Sailors our activitiesfamilies. In this special issue of A// Hands that celebrates the as they proudly serve the United States of America. ;f. Navy’s 218th Birthday, you’ll see some of the nearly12,000 U.S. Naval Forces Operations May 18,1994 Counterdrugs: Atlantic 66 Ships USS Theodore Rooseuelt 13 support units Navigation detail * QM3 Michael Perreira, from Honolulu, shoots a visual bearing from the bridge ofUSS Gary (FFG 51). Photo by JOC(AW) Gloria Montgomery, Fleet Imaging Command Pacific,San Diego. Yes, we’re hiring! V MMl (SW) Kevin Presley, a native of Temple Hills, Md., and a Navy recruiter in Hyattsville,Md., reviews the enlistment contract and enlistment guarantees with applicant Rasoolullah Brother at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) in Baltimore.
    [Show full text]
  • ASHINGTON URVEYOR W S April 29, 2019
    THE ASHINGTON URVEYOR W S April 29, 2019 BY MCSN Jack Lepien By MCSN Tatyana Freeman FALL OF A TYRANT AT SEA AND ASHORE HOW DAMAGE CONTROLMEN MAINTAIN THE DEATH OF OSAMA BIN LADEN THE SHIP By MCSN Tatyana Freeman By MC3 Michael Botts CVN IT SEXUAL HEALTH EMPOWERMENT SAILORS, CIVILIANS KEEP WEB AFLOAT THROUGH INFORMATION washington surveyor Commanding Officer Capt. Glenn Jamison Executive Officer Capt. Daryle Cardone Command Master Chief CMDCM Maurice Coffey Public Affairs Officer Lt. Cmdr. Stephanie Turo Deputy Public Affairs Officer Lt. Tyler Barker Departmental LCPO MCCS Reginald Buggs Divisional LCPO MCC Christina Shaw Editors MC3 Adam Ferrero MCSN Jack Lepien MCSN Tatyana Freeman Content MCC Mary Popejoy MC1 Gary Johnson MC2 Kenneth Gardner MC2 Alan Lewis MC2 Mandi Washington MC3 Michael Botts MC3 Carter Denton MC3 Trey Hutcheson MC3 Kyle Loree MC3 Marlan Sawyer MC3 Zack Thomas MC3 Julie Vujevich MCSN Elizabeth Cohen MCSN Samuel Pederson MCSA Stephen Sullins “Happiness depends more on the inward disposition of mind than on outward The Washington Surveyor is an circumstances.” authorized publication for Sailors serving aboard USS George Washington (CVN 73). Contents herein are not ~ Benjamin Franklin the visions of, or endorsed by the U.S. government, the Department of Defense, the Department of the Navy or the Commanding Officer of USS George Washington. All news releases, photos or information for publication in The Washington Surveyor must be submitted to the Public Affairs Officer. SAILOR in the SPOTLIGHT SH2 Justin Peterson Ship’s Serviceman 2nd Class Justin Peterson, from Sanford, Florida, joined the Navy January 2010. His favorite part of the Navy is being able to make a difference in the lives of his junior Sailors.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Funding AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    Options for Funding AIRCRAFT CARRIERS John Birkler • John F. Schank • James Chiesa • Giles Smith Irv Blickstein • Ronald D. Fricker, Jr. • Denis Rushworth Approved for public release; distribution unlimited Prepared for the United States Navy R National Defense Research Institute The research described in this report was conducted for the U.S. Navy within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of RAND’s National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center supported by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies under Contract DASW01-01-C-0004. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Options for funding aircraft carriers / John Birkler ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1526.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3167-8 1. United States. Navy—Appropriations and expenditures. 2. Aircraft carriers— United States. I. Birkler, J. L., 1944– VA60 .O68 2002 359.6'21—dc21 2002021394 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE For over 40 years, Congress has funded the construction of U.S.
    [Show full text]