Final Summary Report for California Gnatcatcher Science Panel Workshop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Summary Report for California Gnatcatcher Science Panel Workshop FINAL WORKSHOP REVIEW REPORT California Gnatcatcher Facilitated Science Panel Workshop US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE November 9, 2015 Prepared for: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 2177 Salk Ave, Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared by: 2 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & 0 Infrastructure, Inc. 2 0 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A K S Santa Barbara, CA 93101 t r e USFWS Order No. F15PB00221 e t Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. 32106C010 N W W a s h i n g t o n , D California Gnatcatcher Facilitated Science Panel Workshop TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary of Scope and Objectives ....................................................................... 1 2.0 Description of the Process .................................................................................... 2 2.1 Panel Selection.............................................................................................. 2 2.2 Workshop Preparation ................................................................................... 3 2.3 Workshop ...................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Panel Review Questions ................................................................................ 4 2.5 Preparation of Individual Memoranda ............................................................ 4 3.0 Panelists ............................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Major Points of Discussion .................................................................................... 5 Day 1 - Morning Session ..................................................................................... 5 Day 1 - Afternoon Session ................................................................................... 6 Day 2 – Morning Session..................................................................................... 8 5.0 Individual Memoranda .......................................................................................... 8 6.0 Summary of Agreements and Disagreements ....................................................... 8 7.0 References ......................................................................................................... 10 Appendix A: Workshop Agenda Appendix B: Material Provided Appendix C: Complete Individual Memoranda Appendix D: Reviewer’s Curricula Vitae Appendix E: Comment Response Matrix Page i California Gnatcatcher Facilitated Science Panel Workshop Executive Summary The coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) was listed by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) in 1993. A new genetic analysis of the subspecies was published in 2013 (Zink et al. 2013) that disputes its current taxonomic status. This phylogeographic study integrated new nuclear gene-sequence data with the mtDNA analysis from Zink et al. (2000) with some morphology data. Zink et al. (2013) concluded that their analysis does not support the coastal California gnatcatcher as a distinct subspecies. The Service published a 90-day finding (USFWS 2014) indicating that a petition to delist the subspecies, which was based largely on the conclusions of Zink et al. (2013), contained substantial information and a status review as initiated. A large number of public comments were received in response to the Service’s 2014 90- day finding including a paper published by McCormack and Maley (2015) that disputed the conclusions drawn by Zink et al. (2013). As part of the Service’s process to evaluate the status of the coastal California gnatcatcher, the Service requested assistance from a science panel to evaluate this new information in the context of avian and coastal California gnatcatcher genetics and taxonomy. The Service prepared a Statement of Work for an independent contractor to convene a panel to provide an external, independent scientific review of the genetics data described above, as well as evaluate the taxonomic status of the coastal California gnatcatcher. The review included a 1.5 day science panel Workshop with a facilitator in Carlsbad, California. The panelists, who all have expertise in molecular genetics and birds, considered and individually responded to five Discussion Questions, provided to the contractor by the Service prior to the Workshop. These responses were provided through the preparation of an individual memorandum by each panel member. The panelists and facilitator were selected by a contractor (without input from the Service) to provide a balance of skills and expertise to accomplish the review. The panelists had no contact with the Service during their review, except for a brief question and answer session during the Workshop. As described in their individually prepared memoranda, the panel members were in agreement that the currently available genetic data is not sufficient to overturn long standing subspecific recognition based on morphology. The panelists were in agreement that additional research was required to definitively settle the status of the subspecies, but accepted that the current morphological data indicate at least two subspecies with a division at 30oN. Although all panelists suggested additional research and analyses, the panelists expressed some differences as to the appropriate use of particular genetic techniques, and their utility for providing insight into the taxonomy of California gnatcatchers. Page ii California Gnatcatcher Facilitated Science Panel Workshop 1.0 Summary of Scope and Objectives The coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) was listed by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) in 1993. It is one of at least two subspecies of California gnatcatchers (Polioptila californica) that occurs in California and Baja California. Its taxonomic status has been the subject of numerous reviews. Zink et al. (2000) examined the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region and three mtDNA genes and provided new information on geographic structure throughout the entire range of the California gnatcatcher. Zink et al. (2000, pp. 1394, 1402) concluded that “northern populations [of California gnatcatchers] do not appear to constitute a unique component of gnatcatcher biodiversity” and the authors stated that their results suggest that “not all currently recognized subspecies are equivalent to evolutionarily significant units.” In the Service’s 5-year status review (USFWS 2010) and in a 2011 90- day finding (76 FR 66259; October 26, 2011), the Service concluded that the information presented in Zink et al. (2000) alone did not provide sufficient information to disregard the existing taxonomic data and conclusions contained in previous scientific papers before 2000. A subsequent phylogeographic study regarding the California gnatcatcher by Zink et al. (2013) integrated new nuclear gene-sequence data with the mtDNA from Zink et al. (2000). The results of this study found that there were no subspecies groups within the California gnatcatcher. In contrast, a paper published by McCormack and Maley (2015) disputed the conclusions drawn by Zink et al. (2013). The purpose of this review was to provide a formal, independent, scientific panel review of the genetic data described above, and to evaluate the taxonomic status of the coastal California gnatcatcher. The review included a 1.5 day panel Workshop in Carlsbad, California. The agenda and discussion questions for the Workshop are provided in Appendix A. The material provided by the Service is included in Appendix B. Each scientist on the panel provided his or her individual expert review of the available data and responses to the questions presented. The memoranda are found in Appendix C. Coastal California gnatcatcher. Photo from USFWS (2010). Page 1 of 10 California Gnatcatcher Facilitated Science Panel Workshop 2.0 Description of the Process Amec Foster Wheeler Infrastructure and Environment, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) was contracted by the Service to provide a panel of scientists and facilitator for the Workshop to review the publications described above. Amec Foster Wheeler personnel identified potential panelists following the process described in Section 2.1 and based on a Statement of Work provided by the Service. During this process, no identifying information was provided to the Service about the potential panelists; only their areas of expertise and general qualifications were included. Upon award, potential dates for the Workshop were identified and panel selection was finalized. One panelist was replaced due to scheduling conflicts. All communication between the Service and the panelists was performed by the Amec Foster Wheeler project manager (PM), with the exception of a brief question and answer period during the Workshop (described in Section 2.3), to ensure the independence of the panelists. 2.1 Panel Selection The selection of panelists followed the guidance provided in the Office of Management and Budget’s Final Information Quality Bulletin (OMB Bulletin; December 16, 2004) to ensure scientific integrity of peer reviews. Relevant expertise and an appropriate balance of that expertise was identified for this science panel based on the Statement of Work from the Service and used to identify potential panelists. Panelists with expertise in conservation, molecular genetics, taxonomy, systematics, phylogeography, and population evolution were essential for this panel, with an emphasis on experience with birds. The elements considered for producing a balanced panel included:
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Diversity, Habitat Loss and Conservation in South
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2014) 20, 1108–1119 BIODIVERSITY Phylogenetic diversity, habitat loss and RESEARCH conservation in South American pitvipers (Crotalinae: Bothrops and Bothrocophias) Jessica Fenker1, Leonardo G. Tedeschi1, Robert Alexander Pyron2 and Cristiano de C. Nogueira1*,† 1Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de ABSTRACT Brasılia, 70910-9004 Brasılia, Distrito Aim To analyze impacts of habitat loss on evolutionary diversity and to test Federal, Brazil, 2Department of Biological widely used biodiversity metrics as surrogates for phylogenetic diversity, we Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G. St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, study spatial and taxonomic patterns of phylogenetic diversity in a wide-rang- USA ing endemic Neotropical snake lineage. Location South America and the Antilles. Methods We updated distribution maps for 41 taxa, using species distribution A Journal of Conservation Biogeography models and a revised presence-records database. We estimated evolutionary dis- tinctiveness (ED) for each taxon using recent molecular and morphological phylogenies and weighted these values with two measures of extinction risk: percentages of habitat loss and IUCN threat status. We mapped phylogenetic diversity and richness levels and compared phylogenetic distances in pitviper subsets selected via endemism, richness, threat, habitat loss, biome type and the presence in biodiversity hotspots to values obtained in randomized assemblages. Results Evolutionary distinctiveness differed according to the phylogeny used, and conservation assessment ranks varied according to the chosen proxy of extinction risk. Two of the three main areas of high phylogenetic diversity were coincident with areas of high species richness. A third area was identified only by one phylogeny and was not a richness hotspot. Faunal assemblages identified by level of endemism, habitat loss, biome type or the presence in biodiversity hotspots captured phylogenetic diversity levels no better than random assem- blages.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Víbora De Campbell
    Víbora de Campbell Bothrocophias campbelli (Freire-Lascano, 1991) P. D. Gutiérrez-Cárdenas Taxonomía Orden Squamata VU Familia Viperidae Categoría de amenaza ventrales (vs. 124-141 en B. colombianus y 143-153 en B. myersi) y 23 hileras de es- Nacional: Vulnerable VU B1ab(iii). camas dorsales (vs. 25 en B. colombianus) Global: no evaluada. (Campbell y Lamar 2004). Otro nombre común Distribución geográfica Serpiente boca de sapo. Países: Ecuador y Colombia. Descripción Departamentos: Nariño. Serpiente de tamaño mediano, hasta 123 Subregión biogeográfica: Cordillera cm de longitud total. La coloración varía Central. de café oscuro a gris oscuro con patrones Distribución altitudinal: 1.000 - 1.500 de “V” en el dorso, demarcadas por ban- m s.n.m. (Castro et al. 2005). das más claras. Presenta una franja oscura detrás del ojo. Un especimen presentó en Aspectos bioecológicos cada lado una mancha oscura entre las in- Hábitos terrestres, se encuentra sobre fralabiales 6-8. Se diferencia de Bothroco- la hojarasca en los bordes o el interior de phias colombianus por que presenta una es- bosques maduros (Cisneros-Heredia et cama lacunolabial, tiene 152-177 escamas al. 2006, Arteaga 2013). Se ha observado 113 ilícitos y minería ilegal. Adicional a esto, todas las especies de serpientes y en par- Vulnerables ticular los vipéridos son perseguidos por su peligrosidad potencial, aunque hasta el momento no se han reportado accidentes ofidicos con B. campbelli. Medidas de conservación existentes Ninguna. Oportunidades de conservación En la actualidad se está elaborando el Programa nacional para la conservación de serpientes en Colombia (Lynch, com. pers.). Aunque en este documento no se menciona explícitamente la especie B.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomic and Toxicological Profiling of the Venom of Bothrocophias
    Toxicon 90 (2014) 15e25 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Proteomic and toxicological profiling of the venom of Bothrocophias campbelli, a pitviper species from Ecuador and Colombia David Salazar-Valenzuela a, b, Diana Mora-Obando c, María Laura Fernandez c, * Amaru Loaiza-Lange b, H. Lisle Gibbs a, Bruno Lomonte c, a Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 300 Aronoff Laboratory, 318 W. 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210-1293, USA b Escuela de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, Avenida 12 de Octubre y Roca, Apartado 17-01-2184, Quito, Ecuador c Instituto Clodomiro Picado, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose 11501, Costa Rica article info abstract Article history: Detailed snake venom proteomes for nearly a hundred species in different pitviper genera Received 16 June 2014 have accumulated using ‘venomics’ methodologies. However, venom composition for Accepted 24 July 2014 some lineages remains poorly known. Bothrocophias (toad-headed pitvipers) is a genus Available online 1 August 2014 restricted to the northwestern portion of South America for which information on venom composition is lacking. Here, we describe the protein composition, toxicological profiling, Keywords: and antivenom neutralization of the venom of Bothrocophias campbelli, a species distrib- Snake venom uted in Colombia and Ecuador. Our analyses show that its venom mainly consists of Venomics Proteomic phospholipases A2 (43.1%), serine proteinases (21.3%), and metalloproteinases (15.8%). The Toxicity low proportion of metalloproteinases and high amount of a Lys49 phospholipase A2 ho- Viperidae mologue correlate well with the low hemorrhagic and high myotoxic effects found.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Base of Molecular Data, a Great Difference Between Sedentary
    ISSN 2347-6893 On the base of molecular data, a great difference between sedentary subspecies of Prinia subflava Gmelin, 1789 suggests resurrecting name Prinia mutatrix Meise, 1936 Billy Nguembock1,2,*, Mahamat Sali1, Azang Esther Diane Olivia1, Guehoada Yollande1 1Laboratory of Zoology, Ornithology Unit, Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, University of Yaounde I, P.O. Box 812 Yaounde, Cameroon; 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128, Center-town, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada. ABSTRACT Prinia subflava is a sedentary member of the “open warblers cisticolid” clade and in our first papers, we noted a strong divergence between Prinia subflava subflava and Prinia subflava mutatrix. To confirm this divergence and leaning partially on our first obtained results, we investigated the genetic variation of the individuals of P. s. subflava (West Africa) and P. s. mutatrix (South East Africa). For the genetic variation, we used three mitochondrial genes (ATPase6, ND2 and ND3) to calculate their genetic distances within the cisticolid ingroup and to explore their mutational differentiation. With our ATPase6, ND2 and ND3, a genetic distance of 5.76%, 5.15% and 5.13% was estimated respectively between individuals of P. s. subflava (Cameroon) and P. s. mutatrix (Malawi) whereas it was, for the protein-coding gene ND2, only of 1.81% between the specimens of P. s. subflava caught in parts of West Africa (Gambia and Cameroon). For the mutational differentiation, a total of 113 different molecular characters were observed on the three markers investigated between P. s. subflava and P. s. mutatrix. Otherwise leaning on our dating results, Prinia subflava subflava diverged from Prinia subflava mutatrix during the Pliocene epoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Natural History of the Ecuadorian Toad-Headed Pitvipers of the Genus Bothrocophias (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae)
    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 19 (1/2): 17-26 17 Wien, 30. Juli 2006 Distribution and natural history of the Ecuadorian Toad-headed Pitvipers of the genus Bothrocophias (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae) Verbreitung und Naturgeschichte der ecuadorianischen Krötenkopf-Grubenottern der Gattung Bothrocophias (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae) DIEGO F. CISNEROS-HEREDIA & MARIA OLGA BORJA & DANIEL PROANO & JEAN-MARC TOUZET KURZFASSUNG Spärlich sind die Kenntnisse über Grubenottern der Gattung Bothrocophias. Die vorliegende Arbeit enthält Informationen zu drei Bothrocophias Arten aus Ecuador: Bothrocophias campbelli (FREIRE LASCANO, 1991), B. hyoprora (AMARAL, 1935) und B. microphthalmus (COPE, 1875), einschließlich Angaben zur geographischen und vertikalen Verbreitung, zu Nachweisen in den Provinzen, sympatrischen Grubenotternarten, Aktivitätsmustern, Verhalten, Körpergröße, Fortpflanzungsbiologie, Nahrung und Lebensalter. Bothrocophias campbelli bewohnt die nördlichen, zentralen und südlichen Gebiete der pazifischen Andenabhänge Ecuadors zwischen 800 und 2000 m; Bothrocophias hyoprora kommt im nördlichen und südlichen Amazonastiefland und an den unteren östlichen Hän- gen der Anden Ecuadors zwischen 210 und 1500 m vor, Bothrocophias microphthalmus an deren Südosthängen zwischen 600 und 2350 m. Die Arbeit berichtet über den zweiten Fundortnachweis von B. campbelli in der Provinz Imbabura und den westlichsten Fundort von B. hyoprora im Tal des Nangaritza Flusses. Das ympatrische Vorkom- men von B. hyoprora und B. microphthalmus im Makuma-Gebiet, Provinz Morona-Santiago, wird bestätigt, was die bisher bekannte obere Verbreitungsgrenze von B. microphthalmus auf zumindest 600 m anhebt. Das Weiß- bauch-Mausopossum Marmosops noctivagus wird erstmals als Beutetier von B. microphthalmus beschrieben. Die neuen Daten über die Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Grubenottern der Gattung Bothrocophias umfassen Wurfgröße und Körperlänge Neugeborener bei B.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual De Normas Y Procedimientos Sobre Prevención Y Tratamiento De Accidentes Ocasionados Por Mordedura De Serpientes
    Normas manejo de Accidentes Ofídicos 1 __________________________________________________________________________ MINISTERIO DE SALUD PÚBLICA DIRECCIÓN DE NORMATIZACIÓN DEL SISTEMA NACIONAL DE SALUD MANUAL DE NORMAS Y PROCEDIMIENTOS SOBRE PREVENCIÓN Y TRATAMIENTO DE ACCIDENTES OCASIONADOS POR MORDEDURA DE SERPIENTES ECUADOR 2008. Normas manejo de Accidentes Ofídicos 2 __________________________________________________________________________ MINISTERIO DE SALUD PÚBLICA SUBSECRETARIA REGIONAL DE SALUD COSTA E INSULAR DIRECCIÓN DE NORMATIZACIÓN DEL SISTEMA NACIONAL DE SALUD DIRECCION DE CONTROL Y MEJORAMIENTO EN SALUD PUBLICA INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE HIGIENE Y MEDICINA TROPICAL “LEOPOLDO IZQUIETA PEREZ” MANUAL DE NORMAS Y PROCEDIMIENTOS SOBRE PREVENCIÓN Y TRATAMIENTO DE ACCIDENTES OCASIONADOS POR MORDEDURA DE SERPIENTES Ecuador - 2.007 Normas manejo de Accidentes Ofídicos 3 __________________________________________________________________________ AUTORIDADES NACIONALES Dra. Caroline Chang Campos MINISTRA DE SALUD PÚBLICA DEL ECUADOR Dr. Ernesto Torres Terán SUBSECRETARIO DE SALUD DEL ECUADOR Dr. Carlos Velasco Enríquez SUBSECRETARIO DE EXTENSIÓN EN PROTECCIÓN SOCIAL Dr. Ricardo Cañizárez Fuentes SUBSECRETARIO REGIONAL DE SALUD COSTA E INSULAR Dra. Carmen Laspina Arellano DIRECTORA GENERAL DE SALUD Dra. Bernarda Salas Moreira DIRECTORA DE NORMATIZACION SISTEMA NACIONAL DE SALUD Dra. Eulalia Narváez Grijalva DIRECTORA DE CONTROL Y MEJORAMIENTO SALUD PÚBLICA Normas manejo de Accidentes Ofídicos 4 __________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Jéssica Fenker Antunes Diversidade Filogenética, Distribuição Geográfica E Prioridades De Conservação Em Jararacas Sulam
    Jéssica Fenker Antunes Diversidade Filogenética, Distribuição Geográfica e Prioridades de Conservação em Jararacas Sulamericanas (Serpentes: Viperidae: Bothrops e Bothrocophias) Orientador: Dr. Cristiano de Campos Nogueira Universidade de Brasília Março 2012 Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal Diversidade Filogenética, Distribuição Geográfica e Prioridades de Conservação em Jararacas Sulamericanas (Bothrops e Bothrocophias: Serpentes, Viperidae) Jéssica Fenker Antunes Dr. Cristiano de Campos Nogueira (Orientador) Universidade de Brasília – DF Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Animal como parte dos requisitos necessários para à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Biologia Animal. Brasília, Março de 2012 “There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened”. Douglas Adams Agradecimentos Todo este trabalho contou, direta ou indiretamente, com a ajuda de muitas pessoas, sem as quais seria muito mais difícil sua realização. Ele foi um passo importantíssimo para meu amadurecimento acadêmico e pessoal. Assim, agradeço a todos que de alguma forma cooperaram para o desenvolvimento deste manuscrito, mas principalmente a todos que ajudaram e acompanharam esta etapa da minha vida. Em especial aqueles que sabem o quanto o primeiro ano foi dificil. Agradeço ao Cristiano Nogueira, meu orientador, por todo o aprendizado, paciência, amizade, auxílio e apoio prestados, desde antes de ser sua aluna. Sua contribuição na minha formação acadêmica é inestimável e a forma que você trabalha com os répteis é inspiradora.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Data on Birds of Kinshasa in Democratic Republic of Congo
    Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 5 (2015) 218-233 doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2015.03.011 D DAVID PUBLISHING Recent Data on Birds of Kinshasa in Democratic Republic of Congo Julien Kumanenge Punga1 and Séraphin Ndey Bibuya Ifuta2 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Kinshasa, P.O. Box 190, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo 2. Department of Biology, Teaching Higher Institute of Gombe, P.O. Box 3580, Gombe, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo Abstract: The study aimed at understanding the current avifauna characteristics, like composition, species diversity and evolution, in the city of Kinshasa. The study was conducted from 2006 to 2014, using observation, photography and Japanese nets. Results of the study indicate that there are 131 species of birds, which represents 40 families and 16 orders. Avifauna of Kinshasa represents 11% of species of the all country. Among those species, 12 are new. Passerines are the most, representing 86 species and 21 families, and are the most diversified. Few species have extended their geographical distribution and some are migratory. Overtime, avian fauna of Kinshasa region has undergone a lot of changes in its composition and diversity. Horizontal extension of the city associated with the consecutive various changes of the habitats seems to be the principal factors which modulate those characteristics. However, the study found that the majority of these species were under precarious statute of conservation. Key words: Birds, specific diversity, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. 1. Introduction 1.2 Habitat 1.1 Goals of the Study Kinshasa, formerly called Leopoldville, was founded in December 1881 [9] and had a population Birds have been the subject of several studies in the of 5,000 inhabitants in 1884, living on 115 ha with a Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), formerly density of 43.5 inhabitants/ha [10].
    [Show full text]
  • With Comment on the Choice of Bayesian Branch-Length Prior When Analyzing Heterogeneous Data ⁎ Rauri C.K
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 118 (2018) 172–183 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The systematics and biogeography of African tailorbirds (Cisticolidae: T Artisornis) with comment on the choice of Bayesian branch-length prior when analyzing heterogeneous data ⁎ Rauri C.K. Bowiea, , Eric Pasquetb,c, Jay P. McEnteea, Fadhili Njilimad, Jon Fjeldsåe a Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, 3101 Valley Life Science Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA b UMR7205 CNRS, «Origine, Structure et Evolution de la Biodiversité», Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 55 Rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France c UMS2700 CNRS, «Outils et Méthodes de la Systématique Intégrative», Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 43, rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France d Udzungwa Forest Project, P.O. Box 99, Mangúla-Morogoro, Tanzania e Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Long-billed Tailorbird (Artisornis moreaui), one of Africa’s rarest birds, has a strikingly disjunct distribution, Competitive exclusion the origin of which has long puzzled biogeographers. One small population (subspecies moreaui) occurs in sub- Taxon cycle montane forest in the East Usambara Mountains, a sky island near the coast of northern Tanzania, and another Sky island (subspecies sousae) on Serra Jeci in northwestern Mozambique, 950 km away. The African Tailorbird, the pu- Montane tative sister-species of Long-billed Tailorbird, also occurs in the East Usambara Mountains and on Serra Jeci, but Eastern Arc Mountains in addition occupies all the Eastern Arc Mountain forests between these disjunct sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Size Distributions at Community, Regional Or Taxonomic Scales Do Not
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2013) bs_bs_banner RESEARCH Body size distributions at local, PAPER community or taxonomic scales do not predict the direction of trait-driven diversification in snakes in the United States Frank T. Burbrink1,2* and Edward A. Myers1,2 1Department of Biology, The College of Staten ABSTRACT Island, The City University of New York, 2800 Aim We determine whether trait-driven diversification yields similar body size Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA, 2Department of Biology, The Graduate distributions for snakes in local, regional and phylogenetic assemblages. School and University Center, The City Location United States, North America. University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA Methods Using total length and mass, we examine body size frequency distribu- tions (BSFD) across 79 sites and respective biomes to determine if these areas represent random subsamples from the source pools of taxon body sizes. Using QuaSSE, we determine if the most probable model of trait-driven diversification in the three most common groups of snakes in North America, the ratsnakes, pitvipers and watersnakes, is similar to the predicted regional BSFD. Results BSFD of snakes at the community, biome, regional and clade scales show symmetric distributions of body size. These patterns may simply be generated from random statistical subsampling. Speciation rates are not highest at or near the modal body size and simulations show that linear trait-driven models can still yield highly symmetric distributions of body size. Main conclusions In this study region, processes such as competition due to size do not alter BSFD from one scale to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles of Ecuador: a Resource-Rich Online Portal, with Dynamic
    Offcial journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [General Section]: 209–229 (e178). Reptiles of Ecuador: a resource-rich online portal, with dynamic checklists and photographic guides 1Omar Torres-Carvajal, 2Gustavo Pazmiño-Otamendi, and 3David Salazar-Valenzuela 1,2Museo de Zoología, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontifcia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Avenida 12 de Octubre y Roca, Apartado 17- 01-2184, Quito, ECUADOR 3Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y Cambio Climático (BioCamb) e Ingeniería en Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos, Facultad de Ciencias de Medio Ambiente, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Machala y Sabanilla EC170301, Quito, ECUADOR Abstract.—With 477 species of non-avian reptiles within an area of 283,561 km2, Ecuador has the highest density of reptile species richness among megadiverse countries in the world. This richness is represented by 35 species of turtles, fve crocodilians, and 437 squamates including three amphisbaenians, 197 lizards, and 237 snakes. Of these, 45 species are endemic to the Galápagos Islands and 111 are mainland endemics. The high rate of species descriptions during recent decades, along with frequent taxonomic changes, has prevented printed checklists and books from maintaining a reasonably updated record of the species of reptiles from Ecuador. Here we present Reptiles del Ecuador (http://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/reptiliaweb), a free, resource-rich online portal with updated information on Ecuadorian reptiles. This interactive portal includes encyclopedic information on all species, multimedia presentations, distribution maps, habitat suitability models, and dynamic PDF guides. We also include an updated checklist with information on distribution, endemism, and conservation status, as well as a photographic guide to the reptiles from Ecuador.
    [Show full text]