Biological Identifications Through DNA Barcodes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Identifications Through DNA Barcodes Received 29 July 2002 Accepted 30September 2002 Publishedonline 8January 2003 Biologicalidentificat ionsthrough DNAbarcodes Paul D.N.Hebert * ,AlinaCywinska, Shelley L.Ball and Jeremy R.deWaard Departmentof Zoology, University ofGuelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1,Canada Although muchbiological researchdepends upon species diagnoses, taxonomic expertise is collapsing. Weare convincedthat thesole prospect for asustainableidentification capability lies in theconstruction ofsystems that employ DNA sequencesas taxon ‘barcodes’. Weestablish that themitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I(COI) canserve as the core of aglobal bioidentification systemfor animals. First, wedemonstratethat COI profiles, derivedfrom thelow-density sampling ofhigher taxonomic categories, ordinarily assign newlyanalysed taxa tothe appropriate phylum or order.Second, we demonstrate that species-levelassignments can be obtained by creating comprehensiveCOI profiles. AmodelCOI profile, basedupon the analysis ofasingle individual from eachof 200 closely allied speciesof lepidopterans, was 100% successfulin correctly identifying subsequentspecimens. When fully developed,a COI identification systemwill provide areliable, cost-effectiveand accessible solution to the current problem ofspecies identification.Its assembly will also generate important newinsights into thediversification oflife and therules of molecular evolution. Keywords: molecular taxonomy; mitochondrial DNA;animals; insects;sequence diversity; evolution 1. INTRODUCTION Allander et al. 2001; Hamels et al. 2001). However,the problems inherentin morphological taxonomy are general The diversity oflife underpinsall biological studies,but enoughto merit theextension of this approach toall life. it is also aharsh burden.Whereas physicists deal with a In fact,there are agrowing numberof cases in which cosmosassembled from 12 fundamentalparticles, biol- DNA-basedidentification systemshave beenapplied to ogistsconfront a planet populatedby millions ofspecies. higher organisms (Brown et al. 1999; Bucklin et al. 1999; Their discrimination is noeasy task. In fact,since few Trewick 2000; Vincent et al. 2000). taxonomists cancritically identify more than 0.01% ofthe Genomicapproaches totaxon diagnosis exploit diversity estimated10– 15 million species(Hammond 1992; Hawk- among DNA sequencesto identify organisms (Kurtzman sworth& Kalin-Arroyo 1995), acommunity of15 000 1994; Wilson 1995). In avery real sense,these sequences taxonomists will berequired, in perpetuity, toidentify life canbe viewed as genetic ‘ barcodes’that are embeddedin if ourreliance onmorphological diagnosis is tobe sus- every cell.When one considers the discrimination oflife’ s tained.Moreover, this approach tothe task ofroutine diversity from acombinatorial perspective,it is amodest speciesidentification has foursignificant limitations. First, problem. The Universal ProductCodes, used to identify both phenotypic plasticity andgenetic variability in the retail products,employ 10 alternate numerals at 11 pos- characters employed for speciesrecognition canlead to itions togenerate 100 billion uniqueidentifiers. Genomic incorrectidentifications. Second, this approach overlooks barcodeshave only fouralternate nucleotidesat eachpos- morphologically cryptic taxa, which are commonin many ition, butthe string ofsites available for inspectionis huge. groups (Knowlton1993; Jarman &Elliott 2000). Third, The survey ofjust15 ofthesenucleotide positions creates sincemorphological keysare ofteneffective only for a thepossibility of4 1 5 (1 billion) codes,100 times thenum- particular life stage or gender,many individuals cannotbe ber that wouldbe required todiscriminate life if each identified.Finally, although moderninteractive versions taxon wasuniquely branded.However, the survey of representa major advance,the use of keysoften demands nucleotidediversity needsto be more comprehensive sucha high level ofexpertise that misdiagnosesare com- becausefunctional constraints hold somenucleotide pos- mon. itions constantand intraspecific diversity existsat others. The limitations inherentin morphology-based identifi- The impact offunctional constraints can be reduced by cation systemsand the dwindling pool oftaxonomists sig- focusingon a protein-codinggene, given that mostshifts nal theneed for anewapproach totaxon recognition. at thethird nucleotideposition ofcodonsare weakly con- Microgenomic identification systems,which permit life’s strainedby selectionbecause of their four-folddegener- discrimination through theanalysis ofa small segmentof acy. Hence,by examining any stretchof 45 nucleotides, thegenome, represent one extremely promising approach onegains accessto 15 sitesweakly affectedby selection tothe diagnosis ofbiological diversity. This concepthas and,therefore, 1 billion possibleidentification labels. In already gained broad acceptanceamong thoseworking practice, thereis noneed to constrain analysis tosuch with theleast morphologically tractable groups,such as shortstretches of DNA becausesequence information is viruses,bacteria andprotists (Nanney 1982; Pace 1997; easily obtainedfor DNA fragments hundredsof base pairs (bp) long. This ability toinspect longer sequencesis sig- nificant,given twoother biological considerations.First, *Authorfor correspondence ([email protected]). nucleotidecomposition at third-position sitesis often Proc.R. Soc.Lond. B (2003) 270, 313–321 313 Ó 2003 TheRoyal Society DOI10.1098/ rspb.2002.2218 314P. D. N. Hebertand others DNA-basedidenti cations strongly biased(A –Tin arthropods,C –Gin chordates), acid substitutions,it may bepossible to assign any reducinginformation content.However, even if theA –T unidentifiedorganism toa higher taxonomic group (e.g. or C–Gproportion reached1, theinspection of just 90 bp phylum, order),before examining nucleotidesubstitutions wouldrecover theprospect of 1 billion alternatives todetermine its speciesidentity. (23 0 = 41 5).The secondconstraint derives from thelimited This studyevaluates thepotential ofCOI asa taxo- useof this potential information capacity, sincemost nomic tool.We first createda COI ‘profile’ for theseven nucleotidepositions are constantin comparisonsof closely mostdiverse animal phyla, basedon the analysis of100 related species.However, given amodestrate (e.g.2% representative species,and subsequently showed that this per Myr) ofsequence change, one expects 12 diagnostic baseline information assigned96% ofnewly analysed taxa nucleotidedifferences in a600 bp comparison ofspecies totheir proper phylum. Wethen examined theclass Hexa- with justa million year history ofreproductive isolation. poda,selected because it representsthe greatest concen- Asboth thefossil record and prior molecular analysessug- tration ofbiodiversity ontheplanet (Novotny et al. 2002). gestthat mostspecies persist for millions ofyears,the like- Wecreated a COI ‘profile’ for eight ofthe most diverse lihood oftaxon diagnosis is high. However,there is no ordersof insects, based on a single representative from simple formula that canpredict thelength ofsequence eachof 100 differentfamilies, andshowed that this ‘pro- that mustbe analysed toensure species diagnosis, because file’ assignedeach of 50 newlyanalysed taxa toits correct rates ofmolecular evolutionvary betweendifferent seg- order.Finally, wetested the ability ofCOI sequencesto mentsof the genome and across taxa. Obviously, the correctly identify speciesof lepidopterans, a group tar- analysis ofrapidly evolving generegions or taxa will aid getedfor analysis becausesequence divergences are low thediagnosis oflineages with brief histories ofrepro- among families in this order.As such, the lepidopterans ductiveisolation, while thereverse will betrue for rate- provide achallenging casefor speciesdiagnosis, especially deceleratedgenes or species. sincethis is oneof the most speciose orders of insects. Although therehas neverbeen an effortto implement This test,which involved creating aCOI ‘profile’ for 200 amicrogenomic identification systemon a large scale, closely allied speciesand subsequently using it toassign enoughwork has beendone to indicate key design 150 newlyanalysed individuals tospecies, was 100% suc- elements.It is clear that themitochondrial genomeof ani- cessfulin identification. mals is abetter target for analysis than thenuclear genome becauseof its lack ofintrons, its limited exposureto 2. MATERIALAND METHODS recombination andits haploid modeof inheritance (a) Sequences (Saccone et al. 1999). Robustprimers also enablethe rou- Approximately one-quarter of the COIsequences (172 out of tinerecovery ofspecific segments of the mitochondrial 655)used in this study wereobtained fromGenBank. The rest genome(Folmer et al. 1994; Simmons& Weller 2001). wereobtained by preparing a30 m ltotal DNA extract fromsmall Past phylogenetic workhas oftenfocused on mitochon- tissuesamples using the Isoquick(Orca Research Inc, drial genesencoding ribosomal (12S, 16S) DNA,but their Bothell,WA, 1997) protocol. The primerpair LCO1490 usein broad taxonomic analysesis constrainedby the (59-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3 9)and HCO2198 prevalence ofinsertionsand deletions (indels) that greatly (59-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3 9) was sub- complicate sequencealignments (Doyle &Gaut2000). sequentlyused to amplifya 658bp fragment of the COIgene The 13 protein-codinggenes in theanimal mitochondrial (Folmer et al. 1994).Each PCRcontained 5 m l of 10´ PCR genomeare better targets becauseindels are rare since buffer,pH 8.3(10 mM ofTris –HCl,pH 8.3;1.5 mM ofMgCl 2; mostlead
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera
    ISBN #: 0-921631-12-X BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1991 BY A.J. HANKS &Q.F. HESS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS APRIL 1992 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1991 SEASON 6 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 7 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 8 4.1 The Inornate Ringlet in Middlesex & Lambton Cos. 8 4.2 The Monarch in Ontario 8 4.3 The Status of the Karner Blue & Frosted Elfin in Ontario in 1991 11 4.4 The West Virginia White in Ontario in 1991 11 4.5 Butterfly & Moth Records for Kettle Point 11 4.6 Butterflies in the Hamilton Study Area 12 4.7 Notes & Observations on the Early Hairstreak 15 4.8 A Big Day for Migrants 16 4.9 The Ocola Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada .17 4.10 The Brazilian Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada 19 4.11 Further Notes on the Zarucco Dusky Wing in Ontario 21 4.12 A Range Extension for the Large Marblewing 22 4.13 The Grayling North of Lake Superior 22 4.14 Description of an Aberrant Crescent 23 4.15 A New Foodplant for the Old World Swallowtail 24 4.16 An Owl Moth at Point Pelee 25 4.17 Butterfly Sampling in Algoma District 26 4.18 Record Early Butterfly Dates in 1991 26 4.19 Rearing Notes from Northumberland County 28 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 29 6. 1990 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES, SKIPPERS & MOTHS 32 Hesperiidae 32 Papilionidae 42 Pieridae 44 Lycaenidae 48 Libytheidae 56 Nymphalidae 56 Apaturidae 66 Satyr1dae 66 Danaidae 70 MOTHS 72 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 85 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park
    Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park Platarctia parthenos Photo: D. Vujnovic Prepared for: Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Prepared by: Doug Macaulay and Greg Pohl Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild May 10, 2005 Figure 1. Doug Macaulay and Gerald Hilchie walking on a cutline near site 26. (Photo by Stacy Macaulay) Figure 2. Stacey Macaulay crossing a beaver dam at site 33. (Photo by Doug Macaulay) I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 1 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. Factors affecting the Survey...........................................................................................4 II. Taxa of particular interest.............................................................................................5 A. Butterflies:...................................................................................................................... 5 B. Macro-moths ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Report of Odontosia Sieversii (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae) from Korea
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 29, No. 4: 316-319, October 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2013.29.4.316 Short communication A New Report of Odontosia sieversii (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae) from Korea Sei-Woong Choi1,*, Sung-Soo Kim2 1Department of Environmental Education, Mokpo National University, Muan 530-729, Korea 2Research Institute for East Asian Environment and Biology, Seoul 134-053, Korea ABSTRACT In Korea, 104 species of Notodontidae have been recorded. The genus Odontosia Hübner is characterized by the elongate and serrate margin of its forewing and the prominent harpe of valva and many spinular cornuti on the vesica of the male genitalia and the robust ductus bursae and large, ovate and sclerotized corpus bursae of the female genitalia. Only one species of Odontosia, O. patricia Stichel, 1918, has been reported from Korea. In this paper, Odontosia sieversii (Ménétriès, 1856) is newly added to the Korean fauna based on three male specimens collected at Mt. Bangtaesan, Gangwon-do, Korea. Diagnosis for the species and photographs of adult and genitalia of the genus Odontosia are provided. Keywords: Odontosia, Odontosia patricia, Odontosia sieversii, Notodontidae, Korea, new record INTRODUCTION genitalia and the robust ductus bursae and the large, ovate and sclerotized corpus bursae of the female genitalia (Schin- Moths of Notodontidae are medium to large-sized moths, tlmeister, 2008). Four species of Odontosia are recorded in comprising approximately 2,500-3,000 species worldwide the Palearctic region (Schintlmeister, 2008). One species of (Scoble, 1992). They can be easily recognized by the large Odontosia, O. patricia Stichel was known in South Korea and triangular forewing with a large prominent “tooth” on (Choi, 2008; Park and Kwon, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moths & Butterflies of Grizzly Peak Preserve
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT MOTHS & BUTTERFLIES OF GRIZZLY PEAK PRESERVE: Inventory Results from 2018 Prepared and Submi�ed by: DANA ROSS (Entomologist/Lepidoptera Specialist) Corvallis, Oregon SUMMARY The Grizzly Peak Preserve was sampled for butterflies and moths during May, June and October, 2018. A grand total of 218 species were documented and included 170 moths and 48 butterflies. These are presented as an annotated checklist in the appendix of this report. Butterflies and day-flying moths were sampled during daylight hours with an insect net. Nocturnal moths were collected using battery-powered backlight traps over single night periods at 10 locations during each monthly visit. While many of the documented butterflies and moths are common and widespread species, others - that include the Western Sulphur (Colias occidentalis primordialis) and the noctuid moth Eupsilia fringata - represent more locally endemic and/or rare taxa. One geometrid moth has yet to be identified and may represent an undescribed (“new”) species. Future sampling during March, April, July, August and September will capture many more Lepidoptera that have not been recorded. Once the site is more thoroughly sampled, the combined Grizzly Peak butterfly-moth fauna should total at least 450-500 species. INTRODUCTION The Order Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) is an abundant and diverse insect group that performs essential ecological functions within terrestrial environments. As a group, these insects are major herbivores (caterpillars) and pollinators (adults), and are a critical food source for many species of birds, mammals (including bats) and predacious and parasitoid insects. With hundreds of species of butterflies and moths combined occurring at sites with ample habitat heterogeneity, a Lepidoptera inventory can provide a valuable baseline for biodiversity studies.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Ohio Guide
    MOTHS OF OHIO field guide DIVISION OF WILDLIFE This booklet is produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife as a free publication. This booklet is not for resale. Any unauthorized INTRODUCTION reproduction is prohibited. All images within this booklet are copyrighted by the Division of Wildlife and it’s contributing artists and photographers. For additional information, please call 1-800-WILDLIFE. Text by: David J. Horn Ph.D Moths are one of the most diverse and plentiful HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE groups of insects in Ohio, and the world. An es- Scientific Name timated 160,000 species have thus far been cata- Common Name Group and Family Description: Featured Species logued worldwide, and about 13,000 species have Secondary images 1 Primary Image been found in North America north of Mexico. Secondary images 2 Occurrence We do not yet have a clear picture of the total Size: when at rest number of moth species in Ohio, as new species Visual Index Ohio Distribution are still added annually, but the number of species Current Page Description: Habitat & Host Plant is certainly over 3,000. Although not as popular Credit & Copyright as butterflies, moths are far more numerous than their better known kin. There is at least twenty Compared to many groups of animals, our knowledge of moth distribution is very times the number of species of moths in Ohio as incomplete. Many areas of the state have not been thoroughly surveyed and in some there are butterflies. counties hardly any species have been documented. Accordingly, the distribution maps in this booklet have three levels of shading: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]