DOCSLIB.ORG

Eat and Be Eaten Porpoise Diet Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eat and Be Eaten Porpoise Diet Studies EAT AND BE EATEN PORPOISE DIET STUDIES Maarten Frederik Leopold Thesis committee Promotor Prof. dr. ir. P.J.H. Reijnders Professor of Ecology and Management of Marine Mammals Wageningen University Other members Prof. dr. A.D. Rijnsdorp, Wageningen University Prof. dr. U. Siebert, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany Prof. dr. M. Naguib, Wageningen University Mr M.L. Tasker, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, United Kingdom This research was conducted under the auspices of the Netherlands Research School for the Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment (SENSE). EAT AND BE EATEN PORPOISE DIET STUDIES Maarten Frederik Leopold Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. ir. A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Friday 20 November 2015 at 4 p.m. in the Aula. Maarten Frederik Leopold Eat or be eaten: porpoise diet studies 239 pages PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2015) With references, with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN 978-94-6257-558-5 There is a crack a crack in everything... that’s how the light gets in Leonard Cohen (1992) Anthem Contents 1. Introduction: Being small, living on the edge 9 2. Not all harbour porpoises are equal: which factors determine 26 what individual animals should, and can eat? 3. Are starving harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) sentenced 56 to eat junk food? 4. Stomach contents analysis as an aid to identify bycatch 88 in stranded harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena 5. Follow the fish: do harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) 112 respond to better water quality up rivers? 6. Detection of grey seal Halichoerus grypus DNA in attack wounds 136 on stranded harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena 7. Exposing the grey seal as a major predator of harbour porpoises 151 8. Porpoises: From predators to prey 168 9. Are porpoises opportunistic foragers? What are the constraints 196 for feeding of this supposed top-predator? 10. Addendum 208 Curriculum vitae 211 Summary 213 Nederlandse samenvatting 219 Publications: diet (related) studies 225 Dankwoord / Acknowledgements 232 Names and addresses of authors Geert Aarts1 Guido O. Keijl1,11 Lineke Begeman2,3 Mardik F. Leopold1,12 Judith D. L. van Bleijswijk4 Jaap van der Meer13,14 Sophie M. J. M. Brasseur1 Erik H.W.G Meesters1 Elze Dijkman1 Lara Mielke1,6 Andrea Gröne2 Peter J.H. Reijnders1,12 Jan Haelters5 Tara Schelling1,6 Eileen Heße1,6 Liliane Solé1,15 Jaap van der Hiele7,8 Lizzy van der Steeg1,6 Sjoukje Hiemstra2 Carolien H. Strating1,16 Lonneke L. IJsseldijk2 Dorien Verheyen1 Thierry Jauniaux9,10 Harry J. Witte4 1 Wageningen-IMARES, PO Box 57, 1780 AB Den Helder, The Netherlands 2 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands 3(current address): Viroscience Department, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands 4Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biological Oceanography, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, PO Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, The Netherlands 5Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Operational Directorate Natural Environment (OD Nature), 3de en 23ste Linieregimentsplein, B-8400 Oostende, Belgium 6University of Applied Sciences van Hall Larenstein, PO Box 1528, 8901 BV Leeuwarden, The Netherlands 7EHBZ Regio zuidwest, c/o Seal Rehabilitation and Research Centre, Hoofdstraat 94a, 9968 AG Pieterburen, The Netherlands 8Present address: Stichting A Seal for Sea Mammal Rescue, Haringvlietplein 3, 3251 LD Stellendam, The Netherlands 9Department of Pathology, Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, B43 Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium 10Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Operational Directorate Natural Environment (OD Nature), Gulledelle 100, 1200 Brussels, Belgium 11Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 12Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen University, The Netherlands 13Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, PO BOX 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, The Netherlands 14Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Earth & Life Sciences, Department of Theoretical Biology, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands 15HZ University of Applied Sciences, Edisonweg 4, 4382 NW Vlissingen, The Netherlands 16CAH Vilentum Applied University, Stadhuisplein 40, 1315 XA Almere, The Netherlands Chapter 1 8 Introduction Introduction: Being small, living on the edge 1 9 Chapter 1 10 Introduction Introduction: Being small, living on the edge 1 The harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena (Linnaeus, 1758), is one of the smallest cetaceans, in an order that holds less than 100 living species (Rice 1998; Committee on Taxonomy 2014; Wilson & Mittermeier 2014). The taxonomy of cetaceans is not yet fully resolved, and many “species” may in fact be clusters of very similar, or cryptic species that are not easily distinguished from each other. With the rapidly advancing work on genetics, existing species are increasingly being split into several species (e.g. LeDuc et al. 2008; Jackson et al. 2014). The same may be said about the skills of field observers, who also provide new evidence that known species should probably be split into several new species (e.g. Pitman et al. 2010). The size range within the limited number of cetacean species is rather staggering. The order has the largest animal species that ever lived on Earth at one end of the size spectrum, the blue whale Balaenoptera musculus, and several smaller-than- man sized species at the other end. The largest recorded blue whales measured more than 30 meters and must have weighed over 175 tons (although none were ever weighed, for obvious reasons). Such gigantism has been made possible by the abundant, reliable, and high-quality food resources in the world’s oceans (Sibly & Brown 2007), and the zero-gravity environment that these animals live in (Gaskin 1982). Some species evolved in exactly the opposite direction, however, and became dwarfs, at least among the cetaceans. The harbour porpoise is one of these “dwarfs”, at less than 2 meters long and less than 100 kg, ca 0.05% of the mass of a blue whale. Harbour porpoise taxonomy is still being debated, as the species has many populations, or “subspecies” that effectively live in isolation from each other. One may wonder if distant and diagnosable populations are still joined by a cline, and should thus be treated as subspecies, or not, and should be seen as full species 11 Chapter 1 (see Helbig et al. 2002 for a discussion on speciation). The Committee on Taxonomy (2014) currently recognises four subspecies of Phocoena phocoena: P. p. phocoena, the Atlantic harbour porpoise; P. p. vomerina, the Eastern Pacific harbour porpoise; P. p. relicta, the Black Sea harbour porpoise; and a yet unnamed subspecies (scientifically), the Western Pacific harbour porpoise. Even in the NE Atlantic, where different populations appear to be well-connected, harbour porpoises may be evolving towards forming several new species (Andersen 2003; Fontaine et al. 2007, 2014). The largest population in the Atlantic probably lives in and around the North Sea, and is over 300,000 individuals strong (Hammond et al. 2013). North Sea animals are connected to animals living further south (Biscay and possibly further), east (Baltic), north (Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea), and west (Faroe Islands, Island and possibly still further west). Even though porpoises are small for cetaceans, they are larger than most (remaining) fish in the North Sea, and with their comparatively large numbers and high metabolic rates (see below) they are important predators within the North Sea ecosystem. One might speculate that the removal of most large (>1 m or so) fish from the North Sea should have benefitted the harbour porpoise. Along similar lines, it has been suggested that the large-scale removal of krill-eating whales from the Antarctic would have benefitted other krill-eaters, such as penguins and seals (Gaskin 1982; Fraser et al. 1992), but such correlations are difficult to substantiate as other factors have also had major impact on the population developments of the latter (Croxall et al. 1992). Likewise, it has been suggested that North Sea seabirds have profited at large from the removal of large predatory fish from the system, which significantly released the predation pressure on small fish (Daan et al. 2005), the main prey of small cetaceans and seabirds. However, a critical review of the carry-on effects on seabird populations has shown that again, other factors were probably more influential (Camphuysen & Garthe 2000). Population trajectories of North Sea seabirds (Mitchell et al. 2004) are much better known than those of harbour porpoises, with data from only two recent, North Sea-wide surveys available (Hammond et al. 2002, 2013). Moreover, while seabirds generally may have benefitted from the removal of large fish, some species have certainly benefitted from the vast amounts of discards and offal provided to them by modern fisheries. In contrast, porpoises are not known to take fishery waste and must thus have profited less, if at all. In any case, even though harbour porpoises may have benefitted slightly from fisheries by a relaxation of competition, they have also suffered directly,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolution 3.11 Conservation Plan for Black Sea Cetaceans
    ACCOBAMS-MOP3/2007/Res.3.11 RESOLUTION 3.11 CONSERVATION PLAN FOR BLACK SEA CETACEANS The Meeting of the Parties to the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic area: On the recommendation of the ACCOBAMS Scientific Committee, Aware that all three Black Sea cetacean species, the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), the short-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) and the common bottlenose dolphin (Turpsiops truncatus), experienced a dramatic decline in abundance during the twentieth century, Taking into account that the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)-ACCOBAMS workshop on the Red List Assessment of Cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Area (Monaco, March 2006) concluded that the Black Sea populations of the harbour porpoise, common dolphin and bottlenose dolphin are endangered, Conscious that most of the factors responsible for their decline, such as current fisheries by-catches, extensive habitat degradation and other anthropogenic impacts, pose continuous threats to the existence of cetaceans in the Black Sea and contiguous waters, represented by the Sea of Azov, the Kerch strait and the Turkish straits system (including the Bosphorus strait, the Marmara Sea and the Dardanelles straits), Convinced that the plan is an integral component of discussions on Black Sea regional and national strategies, plans, programmes and projects concerned with the protection, exploration and management of the Black Sea environment, biodiversity, living resources, marine mammals
    [Show full text]
  • Is Harbor Porpoise (Phocoena Phocoena) Exhaled Breath Sampling Suitable for Hormonal Assessments?
    animals Article Is Harbor Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) Exhaled Breath Sampling Suitable for Hormonal Assessments? Anja Reckendorf 1,2 , Marion Schmicke 3 , Paulien Bunskoek 4, Kirstin Anderson Hansen 1,5, Mette Thybo 5, Christina Strube 2 and Ursula Siebert 1,* 1 Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Werftstrasse 6, 25761 Buesum, Germany; [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (K.A.H.) 2 Centre for Infection Medicine, Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 3 Clinic for Cattle, Working Group Endocrinology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 4 Dolfinarium, Zuiderzeeboulevard 22, 3841 WB Harderwijk, The Netherlands; paulien.bunskoek@dolfinarium.nl 5 Fjord & Bælt, Margrethes Pl. 1, 5300 Kerteminde, Denmark; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-511-856-8158 Simple Summary: The progress of animal welfare in wildlife conservation and research calls for more non-invasive sampling techniques. In cetaceans, exhaled breath condensate (blow)—a mixture of cells, mucus and fluids expelled through the force of a whale’s exhale—is a unique sampling matrix for hormones, bacteria and genetic material, among others. Especially the detection of steroid hormones, such as cortisol, is being investigated as stress indicators in several species. As the only Citation: Reckendorf, A.; Schmicke, native cetacean in Germany, harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) are of special conservation concern M.; Bunskoek, P.; Anderson Hansen, and research interest. So far, strandings and live captures have been the only method to obtain K.; Thybo, M.; Strube, C.; Siebert, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena Phocoena) and Fisheries Interactions in the North-West Iberian Peninsula
    20th ASCOBANS Advisory Committee Meeting AC20/Doc.6.1.b (S) Warsaw, Poland, 27-29 August 2013 Dist. 11 July 2013 Agenda Item 6.1 Project Funding through ASCOBANS Progress of Supported Projects Document 6.1.b Project Report: Understanding harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and fisheries interactions in the north-west Iberian Peninsula Action Requested Take note Submitted by Secretariat / University of Aberdeen NOTE: DELEGATES ARE KINDLY REMINDED TO BRING THEIR OWN COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO THE MEETING Final report to ASCOBANS (SSFA/ASCOBANS/2010/4) Understanding harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and fishery interactions in the north-west Iberian Peninsula Fiona L. Read1,2, M. Begoña Santos2,3, Ángel F. González1, Alfredo López4, Marisa Ferreira5, José Vingada5,6 and Graham J. Pierce2,3,6 1) Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (C.S.I.C), Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain 2) School of Biological Sciences (Zoology), University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 3) Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, PO Box 1552, 36200, Vigo, Spain 4) CEMMA, Apdo. 15, 36380, Gondomar, Spain 5) CBMA/SPVS, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal 6) CESAM, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade do Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal Coordinated by: In collaboration with: 1 Final report to ASCOBANS (SSFA/ASCOBANS/2010/4) Introduction The North West Iberian Peninsula (NWIP), as defined for the present project, consists of Galicia (north-west Spain), and north-central Portugal as far south as Peniche (Figure 1). Due to seasonal upwelling (Fraga, 1981), the NWIP sustains high productivity and high biodiversity, including almost 300 species of fish (Solørzano et al., 1988) and over 75 species of cephalopods (Guerra, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Parasitic Copepods and Their Hosts in the Western Wadden Sea in 1968 and 2010
    INVENTORY OF PARASITIC COPEPODS AND THEIR HOSTS IN THE WESTERN WADDEN SEA IN 1968 AND 2010 Wouter Koch NNIOZIOZ KKoninklijkoninklijk NNederlandsederlands IInstituutnstituut vvooroor ZZeeonderzoekeeonderzoek INVENTORY OF PARASITIC COPEPODS AND THEIR HOSTS IN THE WESTERN WADDEN SEA IN 1968 AND 2010 Wouter Koch Texel, April 2012 NIOZ Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Zeeonderzoek Cover illustration The parasitic copepod Lernaeenicus sprattae (Sowerby, 1806) on its fish host, the sprat (Sprattus sprattus) Copyright by Hans Hillewaert, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license; CC-BY-SA-3.0; Wikipedia Contents 1. Summary 6 2. Introduction 7 3. Methods 7 4. Results 8 5. Discussion 9 6. Acknowledgements 10 7. References 10 8. Appendices 12 1. Summary Ectoparasites, attaching mainly to the fins or gills, are a particularly conspicuous part of the parasite fauna of marine fishes. In particular the dominant copepods, have received much interest due to their effects on host populations. However, still little is known on the copepod fauna on fishes for many localities and their temporal stability as long-term observations are largely absent. The aim of this project was two-fold: 1) to deliver a current inventory of ectoparasitic copepods in fishes in the southern Wadden Sea around Texel and 2) to compare the current parasitic copepod fauna with the one from 1968 in the same area, using data published in an internal NIOZ report and additional unpublished original notes. In total, 47 parasite species have been recorded on 52 fish species in the southern Wadden Sea to date. The two copepod species, where quantitative comparisons between 1968 and 2010 were possible for their host, the European flounder (Platichthys flesus), showed different trends: Whereas Acanthochondria cornuta seems not to have altered its infection rate or per host abundance between years, Lepeophtheirus pectoralis has shifted towards infection of smaller hosts, as well as to a stronger increase of per-host abundance with increasing host length.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Modelling of Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena Phocoena) in the Northern Gulf of St
    Living among giants: Habitat modelling of Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence By Raquel Soley Calvet Masters Research in Marine Mammal Science Supervision by: Dr. Sonja Heinrich Dr. Debbie J. Russell Sea Mammal Research Unit, August 2011 Table of contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................i 1. Introduction 1.1 Cetacean habitat modelling....................................................................................1 1.2 Ocean Models........................................................................................................2 1.3 The Gulf of St. Lawrence......................................................................................3 1.4 Biology of Harbour Porpoises...............................................................................4 1.5 Aims.......................................................................................................................6 2. Materials and Methods 2.1 Study Area..............................................................................................................7 2.2 Data collection........................................................................................................8 2.3 Generating pseudo-absences.................................................................................10 2.4 Analysis.................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Omslag 2011-7.Indd 1 25/08/2011 12:05 Authors
    Conservation plan for the Harbour Porpoise Phocoena phocoena in The Netherlands: towards a favourable conservation status Kees (C.J.) Camphuysen & Marije L. Siemensma NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research omslag 2011-7.indd 1 25/08/2011 12:05 Authors C.J. (Kees) Camphuysen Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, NL Tel. + 31 222 369488, E-mail: [email protected] M.L. (Marije) Siemensma Marine Science & Communication Bosstraat 123, 3971 XC Driebergen-Rijssenburg, NL Tel. + 31 6 16830430 E-mail: [email protected] Commissioning This project was commissioned and nanced by the Dutch Ministry of Economics, Agriculture and Innovation Cover illustration Reproduced with permission from The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles. Jan van de Cappelle (1649) “Shipping in a Calm at Flushing with a States General Yacht Firing a Salute” Oil on oak panel, Unframed: 69.5 x 92.1 cm. The im- age shows numerous animals in the water that could be recognised as Harbour Porpoises, which were abundant at the time. Recommended citation Camphuysen C.J. & M.L. Siemensma (2011). Conservation plan for the Harbour Porpoise Phocoena phocoena in The Netherlands: towards a favourable conservation status. NIOZ Report 2011-07, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Re- search, Texel. © 2011 Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research omslag 2011-7.indd 4 25/08/2011 12:06 Conservation plan for the Harbour Porpoise Phocoena phocoena in The Netherlands: towards a favourable conservation status Kees (C.J.) Camphuysen & Marije L. Siemensma © 2011 Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research 1 Conservation plan Harbour Porpoise in The Netherlands – NIOZ Report 2011-07 Authors C.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Possible Reasons for Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus) Participating In
    The possible reasons for bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) participating in non-predatory aggressive interactions with harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in Cardigan Bay, Wales Leonora Neale Student ID: 4103778 BSc Zoology Supervised by Dr Francis Gilbert Word count: 5335 Contents Page Page: ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………….......1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………..............................3 METHODS………………………………………………………………....................9 Study species………………………………………………………………......9 Study area………………………………………………………………….…10 Methods of data collection………………………………………...................10 Methods of data analysis………………………………………......................13 RESULTS………………………………………………………………………........14 Geographical distribution……………………………………………….......14 Object-oriented play……………………………………………………........15 DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………….…….18 Geographical distribution……………………………………………………18 Object-oriented play…………………………………………………….........18 Diet………………………………………………………………...................21 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………23 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………….25 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………26 APPENDIX……………………………………………………………………..........33 CBMWC sightings………………………...………………………………….…33 CBMWC sightings form guide………………...………………………….….34 CBMWC excel spreadsheet equations……………………………………......35 Abstract Between 1991 and 2011, 137 harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) died as a result of attacks by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Cardigan Bay. The suggested reasons for these non-predatory aggressive interactions
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Prey Size Consumption in Toothed Whales: Implications for Prey Selection and Level of Specialisation
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 326: 295–307, 2006 Published November 17 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Relative prey size consumption in toothed whales: implications for prey selection and level of specialisation C. D. MacLeod1,*, M. B. Santos1, 2, A. López3, G. J. Pierce1 1School of Biological Sciences (Zoology), University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK 2Instituto Español de Oceanografia, Centro Costro de Vigo, Cabo Estay, Canido, 36208 Vigo, Spain 3Coordinadora para o Estudio dos Mamiferos Mariños (CEMMA), Apdo. 15, 36380 Gondomar, Pontevedra, Spain ABSTRACT: We investigated whether toothed whales consume prey in relation to their availability in the local environment based on the fact that availability of potential prey is likely to decrease expo- nentially with increasing size, reflecting the usual size–abundance relationships found in marine communities. We calculated relative prey size frequency spectra for 13 species of toothed whale from the northeast Atlantic. These differed considerably from an exponential distribution, suggesting that toothed whales preferentially consume larger, less abundant organisms over smaller, more abundant ones. The prey size spectra of the various cetacean species could be separated into 3 distinct groups based on the strength of the mode, maximum value and inter-quartile range. Group 1 species, such as the common dolphin, consume a wide range of relatively large organisms. In contrast, Group 2 and 3 species, such as the northern bottlenose whale and the sperm whale respectively, specialise on nar- row ranges of relatively small organisms. We hypothesise that these differences are related to the mode of prey capture. Group 1 species can capture prey using pincer-like movement of jaws contain- ing a large number of small, homodont teeth, as well as suction-feeding, allowing them to be rela- tively generalist in terms of relative prey size.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Classified List of Fishes Mentioned in the Text, with Scientific and Common Names
    APPENDIX 1 Classified list of fishes mentioned in the text, with scientific and common names. ___________________________________________________________ Scientific names and classification are from Nelson (1994). Families are listed in the same order as in Nelson (1994), with species names following in alphabetical order. The common names of British fishes mostly follow Wheeler (1978). Common names of foreign fishes are taken from Froese & Pauly (2002). Species in square brackets are referred to in the text but are not found in British waters. Fishes restricted to fresh water are shown in bold type. Fishes ranging from fresh water through brackish water to the sea are underlined; this category includes diadromous fishes that regularly migrate between marine and freshwater environments, spawning either in the sea (catadromous fishes) or in fresh water (anadromous fishes). Not indicated are marine or freshwater fishes that occasionally venture into brackish water. Superclass Agnatha (jawless fishes) Class Myxini (hagfishes)1 Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae Myxine glutinosa, hagfish Class Cephalaspidomorphi (lampreys)1 Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae [Ichthyomyzon bdellium, Ohio lamprey] Lampetra fluviatilis, lampern, river lamprey Lampetra planeri, brook lamprey [Lampetra tridentata, Pacific lamprey] Lethenteron camtschaticum, Arctic lamprey] [Lethenteron zanandreai, Po brook lamprey] Petromyzon marinus, lamprey Superclass Gnathostomata (fishes with jaws) Grade Chondrichthiomorphi Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Changes in Abundance of Harbor Porpoise (Phocoena
    242 Abstract—Abundance of harbor por- Temporal changes in abundance of harbor poise (Phocoena phocoena) was es- timated from data collected during porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) inhabiting the vessel surveys conducted through- out the inland waters of Southeast inland waters of Southeast Alaska Alaska. Line-transect methods were used during 18 seasonal surveys Marilyn E. Dahlheim (contact author)1 spanning 22 years (1991–2012). Es- 1, 2 timates were derived from summer Alexandre N. Zerbini surveys only because of the broader Janice M. Waite1 spatial coverage and greater number Amy S. Kennedy1 of surveys during this season than during other seasons. Porpoise abun- Email address for contact author: [email protected] dance varied when different periods were compared (i.e., 1991–1993, 1 2006–2007, and 2010–2012); how- National Marine Mammal Laboratory ever, persistent areas of high por- Alaska Fisheries Science Center poise densities occurred in Glacier National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Bay and Icy Strait, and off the town 7600 Sand Point Way NE of Wrangell and Zarembo Island. Seattle, Washington 98115-6349 Overall abundance of harbor por- 2 Cascadia Research Collective poise significantly declined from the 218 ½ West Fourth Avenue early 1990s (N=1076, 95% confidence Olympia, Washington 98501 interval [CI]=910–1272) to the mid- 2000s (N=604, 95% CI=468–780). This downward trend was followed by a significant increase in the early 2010s (N=975, 95% CI=857–1109) when abundance rose to levels simi- Harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) the Southeast Alaska stock—occur- lar to those observed 20 years ear- are distributed throughout Alaska ring from Dixon Entrance (54°30′N; lier.
    [Show full text]
  • Lernaeenicus Sprattae (Crustacea: Copepoda) on Hemiramphus Far
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 11 (9): 1212-1215, 2012 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.11.09.64157 Lernaeenicus sprattae (Crustacea: Copepoda) on Hemiramphus far Ganapathy Rameshkumar and Samuthirapandian Ravichandran Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Science, Annamalai University, Parangipettai-608 502, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract: Copepod parasite Lernaeenicus sprattae were collected from the body surface regions and there root was found from the kidney of the host fish Hemiramphus far. Lernaeenicus sprattae is a blood-feeding copepod parasite and has a particularly serious effect at the site of infection: its feeding has a severe effect on the fish. L. sprattae damages their hosts directly by their attachment mechanism and by their feeding activities. The observed length of L. sprattae was ranged from 48mm to 52mm. The prevalence of L. sprattae infection was 12.3% and intensity of infection was 3. Attachment on the skin of fishes can cause pressure necrosis and the host tissue responses can include swelling, hyperplasia and proliferation of fibro blasts. Four infested parasites was recorded as a maximum number of parasites on a single host. An interesting case of parasitism (copepod L. sprattae) is reported on the black-barred halfbeak fish Hemiramphus far. These dynamic interactions between parasites and fish hosts were probably the main determinant of host specificity. Key words: Blood-Feeding % Copepod Parasite % Hemiramphus far % Lernaeenicus sprattae INTRODUCTION of Lernaeenicus without assigning a specific name [13]. The revision of the family Lernaeidae has recognised 12 Parasitic copepod are common in wild and cultured valid species in this genus [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 14: 157–169, 2011 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online August 11 doi: 10.3354/esr00344 Endang Species Res Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Beyond marine mammal habitat modeling’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Modelling harbour porpoise seasonal density as a function of the German Bight environment: implications for management Anita Gilles1,*, Sven Adler1,2, Kristin Kaschner1,3, Meike Scheidat1,4, Ursula Siebert1 1Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 25761 Büsum, Germany 2University of Rostock, Institute for Biodiversity, 18057 Rostock, Germany 3Evolutionary Biology & Ecology Lab, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), Albert-Ludwigs-University, 79104 Freiburg, Germany 4Wageningen IMARES, Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies, Postbus 167, 1790 AD Den Burg, The Netherlands ABSTRACT: A classical user–environment conflict could arise between the recent expansion plans of offshore wind power in European waters and the protection of the harbour porpoise Phocoena pho- coena, an important top predator and indicator species in the North Sea. There is a growing demand for predictive models of porpoise distribution to assess the extent of potential conflicts and to support conservation and management plans. Here, we used a range of oceanographic parameters and gen- eralised additive models to predict harbour porpoise density and to investigate seasonal shifts in por- poise distribution in relation to several static and dynamic predictors. Sightings were collected during dedicated line-transect aerial surveys conducted year-round between 2002 and 2005. Over the 4 yr, survey effort amounted to 38 720 km, during which 3887 harbour porpoises were sighted. Porpoises aggregated in distinct hot spots within their seasonal range, but the importance of key habitat descriptors varied between seasons.
    [Show full text]