DOCSLIB.ORG

INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS in the EU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS in the EU INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS in the EU Amended Final Report for European Commission DG Environment Submitted by Agra CEAS Consulting THIS REPORT IS AN AMENDED VERSION OF THE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO DG ENVIRONMENT IN MARCH 2002 Telephone: *44 (0)1233 812181 Fax: *44 (0)1233 813309 E-mail: [email protected] www.ceasc.com 1882/BDB/May 2002 INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN THE EU S1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... V 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. REPORT STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND TO ICM SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................ 3 3. DEFINITIONS OF ICM SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................... 7 3.1. THE ICM ‘CONCEPT’ .................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2. WORKING DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................... 11 3.3. POSITIONING RELATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC PRODUCTION.................................................... 16 4. EU REVIEW OF ICM SYSTEMS................................................................................................................. 21 4.1. BACKGROUND TO RESEARCH SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2. BACKGROUND TO COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS .................................................................................................. 22 4.2.1. Organisations promoting ICM in Europe........................................................................................... 23 4.2.2. Retailer driven schemes (EUREP)...................................................................................................... 24 4.3. ICM SCHEMES BY MEMBER STATE............................................................................................................. 25 4.3.1. Austria ................................................................................................................................................ 25 4.3.2. Belgium............................................................................................................................................... 26 4.3.3. Denmark ............................................................................................................................................. 27 4.3.4. Finland................................................................................................................................................ 27 4.3.5. France................................................................................................................................................. 28 4.3.6. Germany ............................................................................................................................................. 35 4.3.7. Greece................................................................................................................................................. 43 4.3.8. Ireland ................................................................................................................................................ 43 4.3.9. Italy..................................................................................................................................................... 44 4.3.10. Luxembourg ...................................................................................................................................... 48 4.3.11. Netherlands....................................................................................................................................... 49 4.3.12. Portugal............................................................................................................................................ 51 4.3.13. Spain ................................................................................................................................................. 51 4.3.14. Sweden.............................................................................................................................................. 55 4.3.15. United Kingdom................................................................................................................................ 58 4.3.16. Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 64 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ICM SYSTEMS IN THE EU ............................................................. 67 5.1. METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 67 5.2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM RESEARCH ICM SYSTEMS........................................................................ 69 5.2.1. Boigneville (France)........................................................................................................................... 69 5.2.2. The Lautenbach project (Germany).................................................................................................... 71 5.2.3. The CAMAR project (Italy)................................................................................................................. 72 5.2.4. Focus on Farming Practice (UK)....................................................................................................... 74 5.2.5. The LIFE project (UK) ....................................................................................................................... 75 5.3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM COMMERCIAL ICM SYSTEMS................................................................... 76 5.3.1. Champagne (France).......................................................................................................................... 76 5.3.2. The AKIL project (Germany).............................................................................................................. 77 5.3.3. Chianti (Italy) ..................................................................................................................................... 79 5.3.4. Citrus production (Spain) ................................................................................................................... 81 i INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN THE EU 5.3.5. Pome fruit production (Spain) ............................................................................................................ 82 5.4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM NON-CASE STUDY ICM SYSTEMS............................................................. 83 5.4.1. Lanxade (France) ............................................................................................................................... 83 5.4.2. INTEX (Germany)............................................................................................................................... 84 5.4.3. Nagele (Netherlands).......................................................................................................................... 85 5.4.4. Nagele, Vredepeel and Borgerswold (Netherlands) ........................................................................... 86 5.4.5. Logården (Sweden)............................................................................................................................. 87 5.4.6. Boxworth (UK).................................................................................................................................... 88 5.4.7. SCARAB/TALISMAN (UK) ................................................................................................................. 89 5.4.8. LINK- IFS (UK) .................................................................................................................................. 90 6. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ICM SYSTEMS IN THE EU........................................................................... 93 6.1. ECONOMIC IMPACT FROM RESEARCH ICM SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 93 6.1.1. Boigneville (France)........................................................................................................................... 93 6.1.2. The Lautenbach project (Germany).................................................................................................... 93 6.1.3. The CAMAR project (Italy)................................................................................................................. 94 6.1.4. Focus on Farming Practice (UK)....................................................................................................... 94 6.1.5. The LIFE project (UK) ....................................................................................................................... 95 6.2. ECONOMIC IMPACT FROM COMMERCIAL ICM SYSTEMS.............................................................................. 96 6.2.1. Champagne (France).........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P
    Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P. Viaux Technical Institute of Cereals and Forages (ITCF), Boigneville, France Abstract The concept of sustainable agriculture includes important components of economic, environmental, agricultural and social sustainability. To obtain a better under-standing of the concept and interactions of these components, trials were implemented in 1990 in different agroecological regions by ITCF and ACTA to compare the performance of conventional farming systems (CFS) with integrated farming systems (IFS). CFS is a cropping system that is commonly employed by many farmers and requires substantial off-farm inputs such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides. IFS is a low input system which attempts to minimize environmental impacts. Trials were established on farms of 15 to 75 hectares using large plots of 1 to 5 hectares to better evaluate the system’s feasibility, and its economic and environmental parameters. After four years, results for the IFS have shown that a significant reduction in production inputs and costs (25 to 37%) are possible, especially for agrichemicals. Compared with CFS, IFS strategies may lead to lower crop yields (up to 30%) although the economic net return is often higher because of lower production costs. However, studies will continue because there are many aspects of IFS that need to be improved to enhance the system’s economic viability, including intercropping, reduced tillage, and non-chemical weed and pest control. Introduction Agricultural productivity in France has made tremendous progress in the last 30 years, during which time crop yields have more than doubled. Nevertheless, these technological advances have not been achieved without great cost to the environment and to society.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Climate Smart Farming—A Reference Architecture for Integrated Farming Systems
    Article Towards Climate Smart Farming—A Reference Architecture for Integrated Farming Systems Georgios Kakamoukas 1 , Panagiotis Sarigiannidis 1,* , Andreas Maropoulos 1, Thomas Lagkas 2 , Konstantinos Zaralis 3 and Chrysoula Karaiskou 1 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece; [email protected] (G.K.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (C.K.) 2 Department of Computer Science, Kavala Campus, International Hellenic University, 65404 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] 3 Department of Agriculture, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Climate change is emerging as a major threat to farming, food security and the livelihoods of millions of people across the world. Agriculture is strongly affected by climate change due to increasing temperatures, water shortage, heavy rainfall and variations in the frequency and intensity of excessive climatic events such as floods and droughts. Farmers need to adapt to climate change by developing advanced and sophisticated farming systems instead of simply farming at lower intensity and occupying more land. Integrated agricultural systems constitute a promising solution, as they can lower reliance on external inputs, enhance nutrient cycling and increase natural resource use efficiency. In this context, the concept of Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) emerged as a promising solution to secure the resources for the growing world population under climate change conditions. This work proposes a CSA architecture for fostering and supporting integrated agricultural systems, such as Mixed Farming Systems (MFS), by facilitating the design, the deployment and the management of Citation: Kakamoukas, G.; crop–livestock-=forestry combinations towards sustainable, efficient and climate resilient agricultural Sarigiannidis, P.; Maropoulos, A.; systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fishfarming Systems in the Tropics DEC 2 1
    S'H ICLARM STUDIESAND REVIEWS16 I. 207 I SR76 #.16 C.t 1 Research and Education for the Development of , r Integrated Crop-livestock-Fish Farming t \ Systems in the Tropics P. Edwards R.S.V. Pullin J.A. Gartner I If - I:' '!Io, .. .... \D ',- .'. , r . ~ _frl~TERNATIONAL C~NTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAG.EMENT , " i ' :1 i I .I earch and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fish Farming Systems in the Tropics J.A. Gartner INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANILA, PHILIPPINES Research and education for the development of integrated crop-livestock-fishfarming systems in the tropics DEC 2 1 P. EDWARDS R.S.V. hum J. A. GARTNER Published by the International Center for Living Aauatic Reswrces Mana~ement.MC P.O. Box 1501. ~hcati,Metm Manila, Pklippiis with fmancid assistance from the United Nations Development Programme New York. USA Printed in Manila. Philippines Edwards. P.. R.S.V. Pullin and J.A. Gamer. 1988. Research and education for the development of integrated cmp-livestock-fish farming systems in the tropics. ICLARM Studies and Reviews 16.53 p. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines. ISSN 01 15-4389 ISBN 97 1-1022-46-X Cover: Small-scale integrated crop-livestock-fish farming in a rainfed area of Northeast ?hailand. ?his ria farm has a small fishpond that provides fish. pennits dry season cultivation of vegetables on rhe dikes and suppliis drinking water for livestock. ICLARM Contribution No. 470 Contents Preface ................................................. Introduction .............................................. The Concept of Integrated Farming Systems A Definition of Integrated Farming ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Farming Systems - a Review
    IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. Volume 7, Issue 10 Ver. I (Oct. 2014), PP 36-42 www.iosrjournals.org Integrated Farming Systems - A Review Rajju Priya Soni1*, Mittu Katoch2 and Rajesh Ladohia3 1&2Senior Research Fellows, Department of Agronomy, Forages and Grassland Management, 3 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Tea Husbandry and Agroforestry. 1, 2&3CSK HPKV, Palampur 176 062, H.P. (INDIA) Abstract: Integrated Farming systems (IFS), and ways of thinking about them, evolved in space and time. Rapid evolution took place in the last two decades when crop and livestock yields increased, together with concerns about their socio-economic and biophysical tradeoffs. The application of farming systems research (FSR) to agricultural development was a response to problems arising from a predominantly reductionist approach to research and a cornucopian view of external inputs. Modern technologies were either not welcome or caused unexpected negative trade-offs. This paper reviews definitions and forms of FSR and the need for evolution in thinking about agricultural development. Application of thermodynamic theory (TDT) to the study of farming systems influences discussion between cornucopians and conservationists, and between reductionist and holistic approaches to research. There is a need to recognize context (suitability of technology), and to pay more attention to relations within systems (system dynamics) and to defining criteria for sustainability. The paper links biophysical and socio-economic processes, gives a physical background for the anthropomorphic concepts of waste, and reviews aspects of objectivism and constructivism. It is argued that FSR can only advance if the full portent of these issues is considered in thinking about development of IFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming System and Environment
    Farming system and environment LECTURE 11 SS RANA SR SCIENTIST Major issues 2 Food security, livelihood security, water security, natural resources conservation and environment protection, climate change and globalization have emerged as major issues worldwide. Sustainable development is the only way to promote rational utilization of resources and environmental protection without hampering economic growth . Promoting sustainable development through sustainable agricultural practices will help in addressing socio- economic as well as environmental issues simultaneously. Within the broad concept of sustainable agriculture "Integrated Farming Systems" hold special position. Farming system and environment Integrated farming systems: Environmental Sustainability in Full Circle 3 In farming system an inter-related set of enterprises is taken up so that the “waste” from one component becomes an input for another part of the system. Since it utilizes wastes as resources, we not only eliminate wastes but we also ensure overall increase in productivity for the whole agricultural systems. Also wastes as resource reduces cost of production and increase income of the farmer. We avoid the environmental impacts caused by wastes from intensive activities. Farming system and environment BMPs 4 Best Management Practice (BMP), involves the most efficient use of all inputs, including fertilizers, herbicides, seed varieties, and precision agricultural techniques (Goulding et al, 2008). Fertilizers have been central to this approach, which has resulted in a tremendous increase in productivity over that last 40 years. For example, the efficient use of improved fertilizers, combined with new varieties of wheat and the successful use of crop protection chemicals, has increased grain yields from 3 tonnes per hectare to approximately 10 to 11 tonnes per hectare today (Goulding et al, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Farming System - an Ecofriendly Approach for Sustainable Agricultural Environment – a Review
    ISSN: 23542354----23062306 Integrated Farming System - An Ecofriendly Approach for Sustainable Agricultural Environment – A Review By S. S. Walia Navdeep Kaur Greener Journal of Agronomy, Forestry and Horticulture ISSN: 2354-2306 Vol. 1 (1), pp. 001-011, September 2013. Research Article Integrated Farming System - An Ecofriendly Approach for Sustainable Agricultural Environment – A Review *S. S. Walia and Navdeep Kaur Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana- 141 004, India. *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Sustainable development in agriculture must include integrated farming system (IFS) with efficient soil, water crop and pest management practices, which are environmentally friendly and cost effective. In IFS, the waste of one enterprise becomes the input of another for making better use of resources. In integrated crop livestock farming system, crop residues can be used for animal feed, while manure from livestock can enhance agricultural productivity. IFS also play an important role in improving the soil health by increasing the nitrogen, phosphorous, organic carbon and microbial count of soil and thus, reduces the use of chemical fertilizers. Moreover, IFS components are known to control the weed and regarded as an important element of integrated pest management and thus minimizes the use of weed killers as well as pesticides and thus protects the environment. The water use efficiency and water quality of IFS was better than conventional system. Keywords: IFS, Environment, Soil health, weed control, pest control. INTRODUCTION The concept of sustainability is an important element in the development of integrated systems. The MEA (2005) defined it as a characteristic or state whereby the needs of the present and local population can be met without compromising the ability of future generation or population in other locations to meet their needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlandsa Component of an Integrated Farming Operation
    A Publication Written and Produced by the Conservation Technology Information Center Wetlands A Component of an Integrated Farming Operation Produced in September 2008 through Cooperative Agree- The Conservation Technology Information Center has ment Number X7-83163101-0 between the U.S. Environ- compiled this document to highlight success stories in mental Protection Agency and the Conservation Technol- wetland restoration across the country. It is designed to ogy Information Center. provide farmers and others a greater understanding of the technical and social aspects of wetland restoration, in- Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) cluding the many options available to farmers interested in is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to advancing restoring wetlands on their property. Mention of organiza- reliable, profitable solutions for improving the relation- tions or products in this document does not constitute en- ship between agriculture and the environment. CTIC dorsement by CTIC or the U.S. Environmental Protection provides information, education, training and consulting Agency but is intended to provide information, resources services to members and partners working to increase and/or assistance the users may then evaluate in terms conservation and improve profits in agriculture. of their own needs. CTIC prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, 3495 Kent Avenue, Suite J100 disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation and marital or West Lafayette, Indiana 47906-1073 family status. Cover Photos: Steve Werblow. Tel: 765.494.9555 E-mail: [email protected] The Conservation Technology Information Center thanks Web: www.conservationinformation.org Dr. Norman Melvin of the Natural Resources Conserva- tion Service and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Farming Methods and Their Impact on Herb and Bird
    Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2013, 14(3), p.305-317p.1158-1170 DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/14.3.1322 Integrated farming methods and their impact on herb and bird communities of agricultural land – a review Šetrnější způsoby hospodaření a jejich dopad na na rostlinná a ptačí společenstva zemědělské krajiny - review Martina ŠTEFANOVÁ* and Miroslav ŠÁLEK Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, CZ-165 21, Czech Republic, [email protected] *correspondence Abstract During the last century, the changing forms of agriculture drastically influenced many native plant and animal populations. In the efforts to reduce these negative impacts on biodiversity, a number of agricultural enterprises began farming in a more environmentally friendly ways; in addition to conventional farm management, new forms of integrated and organic farming appeared, the latter having a tradition of only a few years. These new approaches have a number of variations, one of which is termed integrated farming. It exerts less pressure on the given environment, and, together with organic agriculture, plays an important role in the efforts to renew long lost cultures. Support for integrated farming can be one of the intermediate stages between organic farming and agri-environmental programmes that very often complement one another. Despite the organic farming may have a negative impact on crop yields and considers individual approaches to problematic sites as well as applications of locally specific rules, a number of studies have confirmed that this kind of farming positively influences biodiversity of a given area. This review highlights importance of integrated farming and calls for its larger use in agricultural practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Pollution from Agriculture: a Global Review
    LED BY Water pollution from agriculture: a global review Executive summary © FAO & IWMI, 2017 I7754EN/1/08.17 Water pollution from agriculture: a global review Executive summary by Javier Mateo-Sagasta (IWMI), Sara Marjani Zadeh (FAO) and Hugh Turral with contributions from Jacob Burke (formerly FAO) Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2017 and the International Water Management Institute on behalf of the Water Land and Ecosystems research program Colombo, 2017 FAO and IWMI encourage the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO and IWMI as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s and IWMI’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence- request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]” © FAO and IWMI, 2017 Cover photograph: © Jim Holmes/IWMI Neil Palmer (IWMI) A GLOBAL WATER-QUALITY CRISIS AND THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE Water pollution is a global challenge that has increased in both developed and developing countries, undermining economic growth as well as the physical and environmental health of billions of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Key Messages
    Production and Resources B5 Integrated production systems B5 - Overview B5 - 1 Integrated production systems and climate change B5 - 2 Climate-smart integrated production systems B5 - 3 Creating an enabling context and removing barriers to adoption of climate-smart integrated production B5 - 4 Conclusions B5 - Acknowledgements B5 - References Overview Integrated production systems use some outputs (e.g. by-products) and services of one production component as input to another within the farm unit. These kinds of systems are the focus of this module and include: agroforestry, integrated crop-livestock, rice-fish, food-energy systems, and less widespread systems, such as aquaponics. Chapter B5-1 presents the interrelations between integrated production and climate change. Chapter B5-2 discusses the contribution of each integrated system to sustainable production intensification, climate change adaptation and mitigation and provides guidance on adaptive management. Chapter B5-3 discusses the barriers to the adoption of climate-smart integrated production systems and the enabling environment for overcoming them. Specialized production systems are the subject of other modules in the Sourcebook: module B1 on climate-smart crop production, module B2 on livestock production, module B3 on forestry and in module B4 on fisheries and aquaculture. In integrated systems, specific methods for diversifying production are promoted to minimize risks. Diversification may consist of mixing within crops and/or animal systems (e.g. multiple cropping over time and/or space, or managing different feed resources and animal species or breeds), or it may entail diversifying the orientation of production in ways that the different production components of the farming system co-exist independently from each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming System and Sustainable Agriculture (1+0)
    Theory Notes COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, NAVSARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CAMPUS BHARUCH Agron. 5.6 FARMING SYSTEM AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE (1+0) :Course Teacher: Dr. Swapnil P. Deshmukh Assistant Professor (Agronomy) NARP, CoA, NAU, Bharuch Theory Notes Farming System and Sustainable Agriculture 1(1+0) Theory Farming System-scope, importance, and concept, Types and systems of farming system and factors affecting types of farming, Farming system components and their maintenance, Cropping system and pattern, multiple cropping system, Efficient cropping system and their evaluation, Allied enterprises and their importance, Tools for determining production and efficiencies in cropping and farming system; Sustainable agriculture-problems and its impact on agriculture, indicators of sustainability, adaptation and mitigation, conservation agriculture strategies in agriculture, HEIA, LEIA and LEISA and its techniques for sustainability, Integrated farming system- historical background, objectives and characteristics, components of IFS and its advantages, Site specific development of IFS model for different agro- climatic zones, resource use efficiency and optimization techniques, Resource cycling and flow of energy in different farming system, farming system and environment, Visit of IFS model in different agro-climatic zones of nearby states University/ institutes and farmers field. Reference books 1. Principle of Agronomy S. R. Reddy, Kalyani Publication, 5th Ed.2016 2. Principle of Agronomy T.Y.Reddy & G.H.S.Reddy, Kalyani Publication, 4th Ed.2011 3. Principles of Crop Production S. R. Reddy, Kalyani Publication, Ed.2012 4. Farm Sector Development D. D. Gupta, Agrobios (India), Jodhpur Ed. 2011 5. Cropping system & Farming System S.C.Panda, Agrobios (India), Jodhpur 6. Principles and Practices of Agronomy P. Balasubramaniyan and SP.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Soil Management on Sandy Soils for Sustainable Agriculture
    Integrated Soil Management on Sandy Soils for Sustainable Agriculture Masterclass 11, Wageningen Soil Conference Vredepeel, The Netherlands, 28 August 2019 Janjo de Haan 2 WUR WUR Field Crops and locations 3 Activities WUR Field Crops Disciplinary Systems research research Comparing Field trials strategies Lab trials Development of cropping and Desk studies farming systems Tool Knowledge Development circulation DSS’s Farmers networks Handbooks Communication Schemes Field days Welcome at Wageningen University & Research Field Crops Experimental Farm Vredepeel Since 1959 5 Soil Profile ▪ Coarse sandy soil ▪ Organic matter 4-5% ▪ Rooting depth 50-60 cm ▪ Susceptible for drought & wind erosion ▪ Groundwater level ± 1m ▪ Water management: drainage and irrigation Crops Total area 170 ha ▪ Potato 40 ha ▪ Sugar beet 25 ha ▪ Maize 40 ha ▪ Triticale + Barley 25 ha ▪ Pea and bean 12 ha ▪ Carrots 6 ha ▪ Black Salsify 7 ha ▪ Leek 4 ha ▪ Onions 2 ha ▪ Grass 5 ha Peelkanaal N 19 29 39 49 18.2 28.2 18.1 28.1 38 48 17.2 27.2 17.1 27.1 37 47 16.2 26.2 16.1 26.1 36 46 15 25 35 45 34.2 14 24 34.1 44 33.2 13 23 33.1 43 32.2 12 22 32.1 42 21 11 21 31 41 Vredeweg South East Netherlands: Intensive, productive but vulnerable 9 South East Netherlands Poor water quality ▪ RIVM: Nitrate in groundwater above 50 mg/l, especially arable farming in SE-NL ▪ Deltares: 30-50% exceedance Nitrate in upper ground water in three of nitrogen standards surface sand areas in NL (upper) and for dairy and arable farming on sandy soils (lower) water in NL source: RIVM Exceedance of nitrogen standard 10 (in red)(source: Deltares) Other sustainability problems ▪ Soil born pests and diseases ● Various plant parasitic nematodes ● Sclerotinia, Rhizoctonia etc.
    [Show full text]