DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fortress War: Effect of Union Fortifications in the Western Theater of the American Civil War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fortress War: Effect of Union Fortifications in the Western Theater of the American Civil War THE FORTRESS WAR: EFFECT OF UNION FORTIFICATIONS IN THE WESTERN THEATER OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by Thomas R. Flagel A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public History Middle Tennessee State University May 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Carroll Van West, Committee Chair Dr. Mary S. Hoffschwelle, Committee Member Dr. Robert E. Hunt, Committee Member Dr. Martha K. Norkunas, Committee Member Für meine Hirten Cricket und Nico ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Primary credit for this endeavor goes to my family and friends, who provided boundless motivation and support despite my long and distant absence. Most of what I have learned about Fort Granger and occupied Franklin, Tennessee can be attributed to the research, writing, and guidance of Rick Warwick of the Williamson County Heritage Foundation. For preservation of earthworks directly studied, thanks go foremost to Fred Prouty and the Tennessee Wars Commission, Dot Kelly and her associates who have moved mountains to preserve and interpret fortifications at Knoxville, Tennessee, Greg Biggs and all those who have made Fort Defiance possible at Clarksville, Tennessee, and Krista Castillo’s staff and supporters of Fort Negley in Nashville. Thanks also to Mary Ann Peckham, Jim Lewis and everyone who has labored to preserve the history and landscape of Fortress Rosecrans at Stones River National Battlefield, as well as Jim Ogden at Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park. Thanks also go to veterans John Sylva, Ralph Walker, and Sam Whitson for their added insights concerning military defenses and occupation. Enormous gratitude also goes to the professional and patient staff at the Williamson County Archives in Franklin, Tennessee, in particular Aimee Saunders, Rebecca Robinson, Siony Flowers, Lisa Lundstrom, and Rose Huff, the Bancroft Library-University of California at Berkeley archives staff, the Emory University Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library (MARBL) team in Atlanta, Georgia, the Western Michigan University Archives and Regional History Collections (WMUA), Kalamazoo, Michigan, the Tennessee State Library and Archives iii in Nashville, the John C. Hodges Library Special Collections staff at University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Bob Duncan and the Maury County Archives in Columbia, Tennessee, as well as the staff of the Wisconsin Historical Society at Madison. I am also eternally grateful for my many colleagues and students at Columbia State Community College who supported this work, especially Hoyt Gardner, Dr. Barry Gidcomb, Dr. Jan de la Mer, Greg Mewbourn, Dr. William Andrews, and everyone at the Williamson County Campus. For archeological work on extant fortifications, I am indebted to Dr. Larry McKee and TRC Solutions and again to the Tennessee Wars Commission. Additional thanks goes to the heartfelt and inspiring motivation from Bill Radcliffe and Trisha Floyd, John Wasson, Mike Skinner, Tom Lawrence, Joe Smyth, Thelma Battle, the Knoxville Civil War Round Table, the Tennessee Valley Civil War Round Table, my publicist Barb Trujillo, Barb Ross, John and Jacki Sylva, Tim Pierce, Green, Billy and Donna Nichols, and Karl Green. Lastly my thanks to the many who have done their best to formally train me, including my professors at Loras College, Kansas State, Creighton, and MTSU, including Dr. Robert Hunt, Dr. Martha Norkunas, Dr. Mary Hoffschwelle, Dr. Rebecca Conard, and Dr. Carroll Van West. iv ABSTRACT Civil War historiography generally overlooks Union occupation forts or interprets them as forward bases of supply. What is missed when these structures are not explored in their wider context? This dissertation determines that the Union Army and African Americans constructed more than 300 forts in some 130 cities and towns in the Western Theater, where the majority of Southerners free and enslaved resided. Further, this study examines the impacts of these fortified positions, particularly upon adjacent slave societies. Initially epicenters of environmental destruction and incubators of human and animal contagions, these forts became major portals for slave escapes. Subsequently, fortified areas enabled many escapees to reinvent themselves as contract laborers and commercial entrepreneurs. Further, by the end of the war, many fortified areas had evolved into generally stable city-states in which Federal soldiers, freed persons, and white citizens achieved tacit levels of coexistence. Posited here is that Union forts resembled Josef Schumpeter’s economic premise of “creative destruction,” a paradigm in which innovations continually dismantle outdated social and economic constructs. In short, Union forts were innovations. Traditionally depicted as arbitrarily destructive, Union garrisons were more commonly engineering operations, many of which successfully reallocated major commercial, industrial, transportation centers from Confederate to Federal use. Much of this stability and social transformation reverted to local white control when the U.S. War Department abandoned over 90 percent of these forts by the end of 1865. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………... viii LIST OF TABLES….…………………………………………………………… ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………… x INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………….. 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE BLUE KEEP – EMERGENCE OF A NEW WESTERN STRATEGY...... 15 The Geopolitical Context……………………………………………….... 17 The Emergence of “Different Principles”………………………………… 24 Bragg’s Great Push Northward …………..……………………………… 26 The Blue Keep and the Above Ground Railroad ………………………… 29 CHAPTER TWO: CONTAGION – THE SCOURGE OF OVERPOPULATION…………….. 39 Fort Granger – A Case Study in Biological Destruction ………………… 42 The Process of Overpopulation …..……………………………………… 53 White Flags – The Creation of Occupier/Occupied Empathy……………. 58 Black Death and Black Labor…………………………………………….. 60 CHAPTER THREE: DECONSTRUCTION – ALTERATIONS TO THE WESTERN THEATER LANDSCAPE ………..…… 69 Creative Destruction in Urban Landscapes ……….. …………………….. 72 The Sound of Power……………………………………………………….. 87 Forts as Urban Slaughterhouses ………………….………………………... 97 An Evolving Stability………….………………….………………………... 103 CHAPTER FOUR: INVESTMENT – NATION-BUILDING IN FORTIFIED ZONES………….. 115 Loyalty Oaths and Political Cleansing…………………………………….. 119 United States Colored Troops……………………………………………… 127 The Impact of Public Works …….……………..………………………….. 137 vi CHAPTER FIVE: RETICENCE – THE ERASURE OF UNION OCCUPATION FORTS…… 146 Regression for the Liberated ……………………………………………… 146 Evacuating the City-States………………………………………………… 154 The Enduring Strategy of Federal Fortification …………………………... 163 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………. 169 APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………….. 195 APPENDIX A: WESTERN THEATER UNION OCCUPATION SITES… 196 APPENDIX B: MOST COMMON ENLISTMENT SITES OF USCT SOLDIERS BORN IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE.. 200 NOTES.…………………………………………………………………………….. 201 vii LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Samuel Boyd Map of April 10, 1863 Franklin, Tennessee …………………. 44 3.1 Gabions and Fascines ……………………………………………………….. 81 3.2 Section of Samuel Boyd Map of Fortified Franklin, Tennessee ……………. 84 3.3 Deforestation around Fort Sanders at Knoxville, Tennessee – March 1864… 86 3.4 Sketch of Fort Anderson in Paducah, Kentucky – April 1862 ……………… 104 3.5 Fort Curtis outside Helena, Arkansas ………………………………………. 106 3.6 The 84th Indiana at Murfreesboro, Tennessee ……………………………… 111 4.1 USCT Artillery unit garrisoned at Johnsonville, Tennessee – 1864 ………. 133 5.1 Union Fort Sites by January 1, 1862 ………………………………………. 157 5.2 Union Fort Sites by January 1, 1864 ………………………………………. 158 5.3 Union Fort Sites by January 1, 1866 ………………………………………. 159 viii LIST OF TABLES 2.1 Local Union Deaths from Three Primary Diseases, Franklin, Tennessee, Spring 1863 ……………………….. 50 2.2 Citizen Burials within Two-mile Radius of Franklin, Tennessee, 1859-1867 …... 51 ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CWH Civil War History JNH Journal of Negro History JSH Journal of Southern History LOC Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. MARBL Emory University Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library, Atlanta, GA NARA National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.C. OR Official Records of the War of the Rebellion SRNBA Stones River National Battlefield Archives, Murfreesboro, TN THQ Tennessee Historical Quarterly TSLA Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, TN USCT United States Colored Troops WCA Williamson County Archives, Franklin, TN WMUA Western Michigan University Archives and Regional History Collections, Kalamazoo, MI x 1 INTRODUCTION In his 2005 study of the Eastern Theater earthworks in the American Civil War, Earl J. Hess observed, “the topic of fortifications is one of the more important yet to be explored by historians.”1 Ten years onward, with few exceptions, the subject remains largely overlooked. When addressed, defensive structures are almost exclusively examined through the prism of military engagements. What do we miss when we do not consider Civil War fortifications within their larger context? Counterbalancing Hess’s focus on campaign trenches in the East, this dissertation explores Union occupation fortresses west of the Appalachians. The region of choice stems from the growing perception among historians that the Western Theater was militarily more decisive than the relative deadlock that transpired in and around Virginia. In addition, it was in the fixed Union fortified areas where the Federal soldier, Southern citizen, and enslaved African American operated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    Social Life and Social Services in Indianapolis Networks During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era KATHERINE BADERTSCHER ABSTRACT: In late nineteenth-century Indianapolis, a group of citizens, united by social networks, dominated the gov- ernance and management of the city’s social services for several decades. The tight-knit network of men and women worked together at the center of social and philanthropic life. Since its inception in 1879, the Charity Organization Society of Indianapolis (COS) wielded virtual control over social welfare—making it one of the most progressive and powerful philanthropic organizations in the country. An influ- ential coterie of men and women governed, donated to, and volunteered for the COS and many of its sub-agencies. Then, as now, social networks are as essential for us to understand as social entrepreneurs and charismatic leaders. KEYWORDS: Charity Organization Society; social networks; social life; Progressive Era; Indianapolis; philanthropy n nineteenth-century Indianapolis, a group of citizens, united by social Inetworks, dominated the governance and management of the city’s social services for several decades. Social networks build and sustain communi- ties, as groups of citizens solve community problems and work together toward a notion of the common good. Such networks facilitate access to information, enhance individuals’ influence, and create solidarity that INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY, 113 ( December 2017). © 2017, Trustees of Indiana University. doi: 10.2979/indimagahist.113.4.01 272 INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY reinforces cultural norms.1 The organized charity movement of Gilded Age and Progressive Era Indianapolis provide an important example of how social networks established and strengthened the community’s prevailing cultural norms.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Guide1
    Produced by Cincinnati Museum Center at Union Terminal Contents Teacher Guide 3 Activity 1: Billy Yank and Johnny Reb 6 Activity 2: A War Map 8 Activity 3: Young People in the Civil War 9 Timeline of the Civil War 10 Activity 4: African Americans in the Civil War 12 Activity 5: Writing a Letter Home 14 Activity 6: Political Cartoons 15 Credits Content: Barbara Glass, Glass Clarity, Inc. Newspaper Activities: Kathy Liber, Newspapers In Education Manager, The Cincinnati Enquirer Cover and Template Design:Gail Burt For More Information Border Illustration Graphic: Sarah Stoutamire Layout Design: Karl Pavloff,Advertising Art Department, The Cincinnati Enquirer www.libertyontheborder.org Illustrations: Katie Timko www.cincymuseum.org Photos courtesy of Cincinnati Museum Center Photograph and Print Collection Cincinnati.Com/nie 2 Teacher Guide This educational booklet contains activities to help prepare students in grades 4-8 for a visit to Liberty on the Border, a his- tory exhibit developed by Cincinnati Museum Center at Union Terminal.The exhibit tells the story of the American Civil War through photographs, prints, maps, sheet music, three-dimensional objects, and other period materials. If few southern soldiers were wealthy Activity 2: A War Map your class cannot visit the exhibit, the slave owners, but most were from activity sheets provided here can be used rural agricultural areas. Farming was Objectives in conjunction with your textbook or widespread in the North, too, but Students will: another educational experience related because the North was more industri- • Examine a map of Civil War America to the Civil War. Included in each brief alized than the South, many northern • Use information from a chart lesson plan below, you will find objectives, soldiers had worked in factories and • Identify the Mississippi River, the suggested class procedures, and national mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastmont High School Items
    TO: Board of Directors FROM: Garn Christensen, Superintendent SUBJECT: Requests for Surplus DATE: June 7, 2021 CATEGORY ☐Informational ☐Discussion Only ☐Discussion & Action ☒Action BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION Staff from the following buildings have curriculum, furniture, or equipment lists and the Executive Directors have reviewed and approved this as surplus: 1. Cascade Elementary items. 2. Grant Elementary items. 3. Kenroy Elementary items. 4. Lee Elementary items. 5. Rock Island Elementary items. 6. Clovis Point Intermediate School items. 7. Sterling Intermediate School items. 8. Eastmont Junior High School items. 9. Eastmont High School items. 10. Eastmont District Office items. Grant Elementary School Library, Kenroy Elementary School Library, and Lee Elementary School Library staff request the attached lists of library books be declared as surplus. These lists will be posted separately on the website. Sterling Intermediate School Library staff request the attached list of old social studies textbooks be declared as surplus. These lists will be posted separately on the website. Eastmont Junior High School Library staff request the attached lists of library books and textbooks for both EJHS and Clovis Point Intermediate School be declared as surplus. These lists will be posted separately on the website. Eastmont High School Library staff request the attached lists of library books for both EHS and elementary schools be declared as surplus. These lists will be posted separately on the website. ATTACHMENTS FISCAL IMPACT ☒None ☒Revenue, if sold RECOMMENDATION The administration recommends the Board authorize said property as surplus. Eastmont Junior High School Eastmont School District #206 905 8th St. NE • East Wenatchee, WA 98802 • Telephone (509)884-6665 Amy Dorey, Principal Bob Celebrezze, Assistant Principal Holly Cornehl, Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Music and the American Civil War
    “LIBERTY’S GREAT AUXILIARY”: MUSIC AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by CHRISTIAN MCWHIRTER A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Christian McWhirter 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Music was almost omnipresent during the American Civil War. Soldiers, civilians, and slaves listened to and performed popular songs almost constantly. The heightened political and emotional climate of the war created a need for Americans to express themselves in a variety of ways, and music was one of the best. It did not require a high level of literacy and it could be performed in groups to ensure that the ideas embedded in each song immediately reached a large audience. Previous studies of Civil War music have focused on the music itself. Historians and musicologists have examined the types of songs published during the war and considered how they reflected the popular mood of northerners and southerners. This study utilizes the letters, diaries, memoirs, and newspapers of the 1860s to delve deeper and determine what roles music played in Civil War America. This study begins by examining the explosion of professional and amateur music that accompanied the onset of the Civil War. Of the songs produced by this explosion, the most popular and resonant were those that addressed the political causes of the war and were adopted as the rallying cries of northerners and southerners. All classes of Americans used songs in a variety of ways, and this study specifically examines the role of music on the home-front, in the armies, and among African Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline 1864
    CIVIL WAR TIMELINE 1864 January Radical Republicans are hostile to Lincoln’s policies, fearing that they do not provide sufficient protection for ex-slaves, that the 10% amnesty plan is not strict enough, and that Southern states should demonstrate more significant efforts to eradicate the slave system before being allowed back into the Union. Consequently, Congress refuses to recognize the governments of Southern states, or to seat their elected representatives. Instead, legislators begin to work on their own Reconstruction plan, which will emerge in July as the Wade-Davis Bill. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/states/sf_timeline.html] [http://www.blackhistory.harpweek.com/4Reconstruction/ReconTimeline.htm] Congress now understands the Confederacy to be the face of a deeply rooted cultural system antagonistic to the principles of a “free labor” society. Many fear that returning home rule to such a system amounts to accepting secession state by state and opening the door for such malicious local legislation as the Black Codes that eventually emerge. [Hunt] Jan. 1 TN Skirmish at Dandridge. Jan. 2 TN Skirmish at LaGrange. Nashville is in the grip of a smallpox epidemic, which will carry off a large number of soldiers, contraband workers, and city residents. It will be late March before it runs its course. Jan 5 TN Skirmish at Lawrence’s Mill. Jan. 10 TN Forrest’s troops in west Tennessee are said to have collected 2,000 recruits, 400 loaded Wagons, 800 beef cattle, and 1,000 horses and mules. Most observers consider these numbers to be exaggerated. “ The Mississippi Squadron publishes a list of the steamboats destroyed on the Mississippi and its tributaries during the war: 104 ships were burned, 71 sunk.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of the Organizations Engaged in the Campaign, Siege, And
    College ILttirarjj FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ' THROUGH £> VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK COMMISSION. RECORD OF THE ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGED IN THE CAMPAIGN, SIEGE, AND DEFENSE OF VICKSBURG. COMPILED FROM THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BY jomsr s. KOUNTZ, SECRETARY AND HISTORIAN OF THE COMMISSION. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1901. PREFACE. The Vicksburg campaign opened March 29, 1863, with General Grant's order for the advance of General Osterhaus' division from Millikens Bend, and closed July 4^, 1863, with the surrender of Pem- berton's army and the city of Vicksburg. Its course was determined by General Grant's plan of campaign. This plan contemplated the march of his active army from Millikens Bend, La. , to a point on the river below Vicksburg, the running of the batteries at Vicksburg by a sufficient number of gunboats and transports, and the transfer of his army to the Mississippi side. These points were successfully accomplished and, May 1, the first battle of the campaign was fought near Port Gibson. Up to this time General Grant had contemplated the probability of uniting the army of General Banks with his. He then decided not to await the arrival of Banks, but to make the cam paign with his own army. May 12, at Raymond, Logan's division of Grant's army, with Crocker's division in reserve, was engaged with Gregg's brigade of Pemberton's army. Gregg was largely outnum bered and, after a stout fight, fell back to Jackson. The same day the left of Grant's army, under McClernand, skirmished at Fourteen- mile Creek with the cavalry and mounted infantry of Pemberton's army, supported by Bowen's division and two brigades of Loring's division.
    [Show full text]
  • Major General George H. Thomas at Nashville
    From Harpers Weekly FORT DONELSON CAMP No. 62 SUVCW Volume 17 Issue No. 2 Spring 2011 Major General George H. Thomas at Nashville While Grant grappled with Lee in On December 15, Thomas, unaware Virginia and Sherman gutted the eastern that Grant intended to fire him, roared out of Confederacy, Gen. George Thomas was sent his works against Hood. In two days his troops back to Tennessee to reorganize the stripped- crushed the Rebel army. His infantry, including down Army of the Cumberland and deal with two brigades of U.S. Colored Troops, smashed CS Gen. John Bell Hood. The Confederate into Hood's troops while the Union cavalry, general had gotten away from Atlanta with dismounted with its fast-firing Spencers, curled some 40,000 troops and evaded Sherman's around and behind the Rebel left. Later, effort to catch him. Now he was marching north historian Bruce Catton summed up the battle in through Tennessee. Thomas' Federals under two words: "Everything worked." John Schofield slowed and badly damaged the Thomas "comes down Rebels in the fierce battle of Franklin, but by in in History ... as the great December Hood was dug in on the high Defensive fighter, the ground facing Nashville. Thomas fortified the man who could never be city while he gathered strength for a decisive driven away but who blow, but to carry it out he needed more men, was not much on the horses and supplies. offensive. That may be a Grant, 500 miles away, grew impatient. correct appraisal," wrote He sent telegrams urging Thomas to move, Catton, an admirer and then ordered him to "attack at once." Thomas biographer of Grant."Yet said after the war that he was tempted— Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Monument: Memory, Preservation, and the Battles of Franklin and Nashville
    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MONUMENT: MEMORY, PRESERVATION, AND THE BATTLES OF FRANKLIN AND NASHVILLE by JOE R. BAILEY B.S., Austin Peay State University, 2006 M.A., Austin Peay State University, 2008 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract The thriving areas of development around the cities of Franklin and Nashville in Tennessee bear little evidence of the large battles that took place there during November and December, 1864. Pointing to modern development to explain the failed preservation of those battlefields, however, radically oversimplifies how those battlefields became relatively obscure. Instead, the major factor contributing to the lack of preservation of the Franklin and Nashville battlefields was a fractured collective memory of the two events; there was no unified narrative of the battles. For an extended period after the war, there was little effort to remember the Tennessee Campaign. Local citizens and veterans of the battles simply wanted to forget the horrific battles that haunted their memories. Furthermore, the United States government was not interested in saving the battlefields at Franklin and Nashville. Federal authorities, including the War Department and Congress, had grown tired of funding battlefields as national parks and could not be convinced that the two battlefields were worthy of preservation. Moreover, Southerners and Northerners remembered Franklin and Nashville in different ways, and historians mainly stressed Eastern Theater battles, failing to assign much significance to Franklin and Nashville. Throughout the 20th century, infrastructure development encroached on the battlefields and they continued to fade from public memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Lonely Sentinel
    Lonely Sentinel Fort Aubrey and the Defense of the Kansas Frontier, 1864-1866 Defending the Fort: Indians attack a U.S. Cavalry post in the 1870s (colour litho), Schreyvogel, Charles (1861-1912) / Private Collection / Peter Newark Military Pictures / Bridgeman Images Darren L. Ivey History 533: Lost Kansas Communities Chapman Center for Rural Studies Kansas State University Dr. M. J. Morgan Fall 2015 This study examines Fort Aubrey, a Civil War-era frontier post in Syracuse Township, Hamilton County, and the men who served there. The findings are based upon government and archival documents, newspaper and magazine articles, personal reminiscences, and numerous survey works written on the subjects of the United States Army and the American frontier. Map of Kansas featuring towns, forts, trails, and landmarks. SOURCE: Kansas Historical Society. Note: This 1939 map was created by George Allen Root and later reproduced by the Kansas Turnpike Authority. The original drawing was compiled by Root and delineated by W. M. Hutchinson using information provided by the Kansas Historical Society. Introduction By the summer of 1864, Americans had been killing each other on an epic scale for three years. As the country tore itself apart in a “great civil war,” momentous battles were being waged at Mansfield, Atlanta, Cold Harbor, and a host of other locations. These killing grounds would become etched in history for their tales of bravery and sacrifice, but, in the West, there were only sporadic clashes between Federal and Confederate forces. Encounters at Valverde in New Mexico Territory, Mine Creek in Linn County, Kansas, and Sabine Pass in Texas were the exception rather than the norm.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler Alumnal Quarterly (1925)
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Butler Alumnal Quarterly University Special Collections 1925 Butler Alumnal Quarterly (1925) Butler University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/bualumnalquarterly Part of the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Butler University, "Butler Alumnal Quarterly (1925)" (1925). Butler Alumnal Quarterly. 13. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/bualumnalquarterly/13 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the University Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Butler Alumnal Quarterly by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V i THE BUTLER ALUMNAL QUARTERLY u ^i ^u I H iBailofliniYersi APRIL, 1925 INDIANAPOLIS Entered as second-class matter March 26, 1912, at the post office at Indianapolis, Ind., under the Act of March 3, 1879. CONTENTS THE FOUNDERS' DAY ADDRESS Dr. Charles H. Judd DINNER SPEECHES Professor Johnson and Dr. Judd AN EARLY FOUNDER'S DAY SONG Lee Burns ANCIENT LIGHTS Meredith Nicholson TRIBUTE TO CATHARINE MERRILL Dr. Harvey W. Wiley COLLEGE NEWS— Editorial From the City Office Athletics Butler in Chicago Butler Publications Commencement Program Faculty Notes Alumni Mention Marriages Births Deaths Our Correspondence — Butler Alumnal Quarterly Vol. XIV INDIANAPOLIS, IND., APRIL, 1925 No. 1 Founders' Day THE ADDRESS By Charles Hubbard Judd Head of Department of Education, University of CMcago. A NEW HUMANISM SUITED TO MODERN CONDITIONS There is a passage in one of Walter Page's letters which puts very vividly the theme which I wish to discuss today. Mr. Page, writing as the American ambassador to the British Court, describes to President Wilson a royal dinner given by England to the King of Denmark and in the course of his description comments on the difference between the American attitude toward ceremonial and the attitude of the typical Englishman.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Architectural Survey Update Work Plan, City of Norfolk, Virginia
    NORFOLK ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY UPDATE WORK PLAN, CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA by Adriana T. Moss with contributions from Peggie Haile McPhillips Prepared for Virginia Department of Historic Resources Prepared by DOVETAIL CULTURAL RESOURCE GROUP August 2020 Norfolk Architectural Survey Update Work Plan, City of Norfolk, Virginia by Adriana T. Moss with contributions from Peggie Haile McPhillips Prepared for Virginia Department of Historic Resources Capital Region Office 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 Prepared by Dovetail Cultural Resource Group 11905 Bowman Drive, Suite 502 Fredericksburg, Virginia 22408 Dovetail Job #19-074 August 2020 August 26, 2020 Adriana T. Moss, Principal Investigator Date Dovetail Cultural Resource Group This page intentionally left blank ABSTRACT Dovetail Cultural Resource Group (Dovetail) conducted a background review and windshield study associated with the preparation of a multi-phased work plan to update architectural documentation within the City of Norfolk, Virginia; the study was done between December 2019 and January 2020. The project was completed at the request of the City of Norfolk’s (the City) Department of City Planning in partnership with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) Cost Share Survey and Planning Program (Cost Share Program). The study comprised a desktop review of past survey records, reports, and associated materials in DHR’s archives and a citywide windshield survey to identify potential areas in need of resurvey or new survey, including opportunities for thematic or resource-specific survey efforts. Particular attention was paid to resources that have reached 50 years of age since the last citywide survey conducted in 1997 by Hanbury Evans Newill Vlattas & Company (HENV), as well as resources in areas targeted for redevelopment as denoted by the Norfolk Department of Economic Development or susceptible to storm surge and sea level rise flooding as outlined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) maps (HENV 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Ohio's Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil
    They Fought the War Together: Southeastern Ohio’s Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil War A Dissertation Submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gregory R. Jones December, 2013 Dissertation written by Gregory R. Jones B.A., Geneva College, 2005 M.A., Western Carolina University, 2007 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by Dr. Leonne M. Hudson, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Bradley Keefer, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Members Dr. John Jameson Dr. David Purcell Dr. Willie Harrell Accepted by Dr. Kenneth Bindas, Chair, Department of History Dr. Raymond A. Craig, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................iv Introduction..........................................................................................................................7 Chapter 1: War Fever is On: The Fight to Define Patriotism............................................26 Chapter 2: “Wars and Rumors of War:” Southeastern Ohio’s Correspondence on Combat...............................................................................................................................60 Chapter 3: The “Thunderbolt” Strikes Southeastern Ohio: Hardships and Morgan’s Raid....................................................................................................................................95 Chapter 4: “Traitors at Home”:
    [Show full text]