Leading the Charge in Methods Innovation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leading the Charge in Methods Innovation Issue #4 Spring/Summer 2016 p 2-3 Supporting the Author’s Voice p 4 Innovative Leading the Charge in Approaches from SAGE p 5 Methods Innovation New to SAGE Image taken from Adventures in Statistics: The Reality Engima by Andy Field, both a statistics textbook and novel enriched with graphic elements. p 6 Behind the Scenes p 7 Author in Profile p 8 Research methods are the connective tissue Quantitative Social Science at Harvard, focusing Tips that binds together the work of scholars across on data intensive social research, showing how for Authors disciplines, across geographical boundaries and institutions can reconfigure themselves to respond across levels, from an undergraduate student to this opportunity. As Gary King, the institute’s embarking on a dissertation through to a senior director, has put it: professor working with a team. The social sciences are undergoing a dramatic While not a discipline in its own right, this activity transformation from studying problems to solving p 9 – the design, collection, analysis and presentation them; from making do with a small number of of data – is the foundation upon which knowledge sparse data sets to analyzing increasing quantities Celebrating claims must sit. SAGE has throughout our history of diverse, highly informative data; from isolated SAGE authors committed to publishing research methods to scholars toiling away on their own to larger support researchers as they develop their fields scale, collaborative, interdisciplinary, lab-style through journal articles, textbooks and now a suite research teams; and from a purely academic of born digital products. Throughout this time, pursuit focused inward to having a major impact p methodological innovations have reshaped the on public policy, commerce and industry, other 10-11 nature of research and SAGE responded creatively, academic fields, and some of the major problems Journal for example by publishing in evaluation, qualitative that affect individuals and societies. News methods, mixed methods and new statistical An example comes from the University of California, techniques. Berkeley, where Nick Adams and his team are Further innovations are only going to grow in analyzing how violence breaks out in protest number and scale, triggered in part by the rise of movements. It’s an old sociological question, but p big data and new technology. Social researchers now with a database (thanks to the number of 12 are agog at the chance to listen to millions of voices, Occupy movements in the US) that is so large the SAGE Video observe billions of interactions, and to analyze only way to analyze the material feasibly requires patterns at a scale never seen before. But to a Crowd Content Analysis Assembly Line, which engage seriously requires new methods and forms combines crowd sourcing and active machine of collaboration, with a consequent erosion of the learning, to code vast corpora of text. This new once insurmountable barrier between quantitative form of social research, drawing on computational and qualitative research. linguistics and computer science to convert large amounts of text into rich data, could lead to insights Moreover these shifts might stick if we continue to in a vast array of social and cultural themes of see centers of excellence, such as the Institute for our time. Continued on backpage 2 Supporting the Author’s Voice Responding to the changing and challenging authors using Kudos sharing tools saw an process. SAGE, who has been a Publons landscape of scholarly research, SAGE average of 19 percent more downloads for customer since 2015, shares the belief that Publishing is addressing debates around their published work. We’re not the only ones peer review is a pillar of the scholarly process enhancing methodological rigor, research seeing the value of getting your work into more and fundamental for the creation of scholarly validity and metrics through extended hands: Kudos won the 2015 Association of knowledge, yet reviewing efforts often go partnerships with both Kudos and Publons. Learned and Professional Society Publishers unrecognized. It is worth noting that since Award for Innovation in Publishing. October 2015 Publons have partnered with ORCID, and using the unique ID Publons- To further enhance the author’s visibility and verified review records are automatically Kudos benefits, we are strongly encouraging displayed alongside other research activities Kudos, a third party web-based service for authors to utilize their existing (or register for a on your ORCID record. authors, allows them to explain, enrich, free today) unique ORCID identifier with each share and measure the impact of their article journal submission. For more information We consider Publon’s work as an important (www.growkudos.com). Following a pilot with on the Kudos and ORCID benefits visit missing piece in our academic publishing 10 journals, SAGE has signed an agreement to www.growkudos.com/about/orcid. industry, and its product is one that will benefit include all of our journals in Kudos until 2018. all publishers as well as the entire academic At SAGE we are dedicated to supporting the Through Kudos – which is free for authors community. SAGE’s investment in Publons (and growth of academic innovators who think – you write a plain language explanation of partnership with Kudos) reflects a commitment outside the box to improve scholarship – even your research, which is then used to create to exploring new ways of supporting robust, when their influence disrupts long-established trackable links for sharing online via email, efficient science and acknowledges the practices, such as peer review. In early 2016 Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. You can changing research landscape. SAGE invested with a minority stake in Publons, supplement your original work with podcasts or a company founded in 2013 specifically to raise There are other ways SAGE supports – and at videos on your Kudos page, and measure your the status of peer reviewers in large part by times defends– the academic voice. Websites own impact by seeing citations and Altmetric making peer reviews a measurable research Social Science Space and MethodSpace, scores for your work. A 2013 study found that output and by speeding up the peer-review sponsored by SAGE, provide those respective 3 communities both a convening place and a the foundational principles of academic Our advocacy also emphasizes proactive venue for discussing the infrastructure of their knowledge, such as peer review. In the United attempts to win hearts and minds on the craft. One particular initiative at Social Science States, we have watched warily as some importance of social science research and Space has been the acclaimed Social Science members of Congress call for reducing funding the role it can play in responding to societal Bites podcasts produced by philosopher Nigel for some disciplines, such as social science challenges. In that spirit, on May 11 SAGE will Warburton and journalist David Edmonds. or geoscience, that can produce outputs at host a session on Capitol Hill where Gary King Now in its fourth year, the audio series has odds with their politics. Congressman Lamar of Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social now spawned a print collection – Big Ideas Smith of Texas, who heads the House of Science will detail the possibilities presented in Social Science – of transcripts from some Representatives Science Committee, has by the academic analysis of big data – and of its most fascinating interviews with world- introduced several bills that have been opposed how that scholarly knowledge augmented leading academics such as Stephen Pinker, by a collaboration of scholarly societies because by innovative methods can hugely benefit Nobel Prize winning economist Robert J Shiller, the legislation targeted specific disciplines or important priorities such as national security and gerontologist Sarah Harper. Big Ideas, straight-jacketed the merit review process by and economic competiveness. Approaches to like the graphic novel statistics textbook by which the National Science Foundation funds social research are changing and SAGE is not Andy Field, steps away from the type of books research grants. only engaged in addressing these changes, but SAGE traditionally publishes and embraces an also on the frontline supporting our authors, SAGE has responded to this in several ways, innovative approach to our mission of serving editors and research community as a whole. such as signing letters from umbrella groups the community and supporting the author’s like the Coalition for National Science voice. Funding to increase science funding overall For more on Kudos, read the interview on page 7. Our mission also calls for SAGE to advocate for or by hosting quarterly webinars (archived our authors’ and editors’ interests in keeping at Social Science Space) to explain the research and its dissemination in the vanguard, process and importance of the federal funding whether socially, technologically or financially. process to a shell-shocked community that SAGE continues to press governments may need to be shown how to stand up for its worldwide to fund basic research and protect own interests. © 2016 Richard Pasley Professor Gary King, above, develops and applies empirical methods in many areas of social science research, focusing on innovations from statistical theory to practical application. 4 Innovative Approaches from SAGE SAGE has always prided itself as being an innovative publisher, both in developing and leading new research fields and in finding the best ways to deliver scholarly knowledge. One such new idea is SAGE Recommends, which takes advantage of a proprietary 63,000-word social science taxonomy we’ve developed with the help of Expert Systems to mine the 1.5 million journal articles, more than 250,000 book chapters and reference works, and much more contained in the online scholarly resources: SAGE Knowledge, SAGE Journals, SAGE Research Methods, SAGE Stats, US Political Stats, SAGE Business Researcher, and CQ Researcher. The feature reveals connections between content and concepts across disciplines.
Recommended publications
  • Download Book of Abstracts
    Complex Nanophotonics Science Camp cumberland lodge Windsor Great Park Berkshire, SL4 2HP, UK 27th–30th August 2013 Bringing together early career scientists to bridge Nanophotonics, Plasmonics & Biophotonics of complex media. Jacopo Bertolotti Twente University, The Netherlands [email protected] www.jacopobertolotti.com Otto Muskens COMMITTEE Southampton University, UK [email protected] www.ottolmuskens.info Sylvain Gigan Langevin Institute, ESPCI, France [email protected] www.institut-langevin.espci.fr/Sylvain-Gigan,510 Riccardo Sapienza SCIENTIFIC King’s College London, UK [email protected] www.sapienzalab.org Conference Secretary Julia Kilpatrick [email protected] www.sciencecamp.eu Niek van Hulst ICFO, The Institute of Photonic Science tracking nanoScale coherent energy tranSfer in Single light harveSting complexeS p16–17 SPEAKERS Stefania Residori Institut Non Lineaire de Nice , INLN–CNRS Self-adaptive holography in nonlinear media p18–19 Aristide Dogariu CREOL, Florida mechanical action in complex electromagnetic fieldS KEYNOTE p20–21 Rashid Zia Regine Frank Brown University KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology a multipolar emitter: can 1 tranSition the quantum nature illuminate 2 pathS? of random laSerS p22–23 p42–43 SPEAKERS Tomas Cizmar Jaesuk Hwang University of St. Andrews Imperial College photonicS in Single organic dye diSordered moleculeS aS Single environmentS and photon SourceS fibre baSed imaging and large optical nonlinearitieS on a photonic chip p28–29 p44–45 Wonshik Choi Andrea
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Approach Toward Publishing in Springer And
    The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals Hajar Sotudeh and Zahra Ghasempour* Purpose: The present study explored tendencies of the world’s coun- tries—at individual and scientific development levels—toward publishing in APC-funded open access journals. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a bibliometric method, it studied OA and NOA articles issued in Springer and Elsevier’s APC journals‎ during 2007–2011. The data were gathered using a wide number of sources including Sherpa/Romeo, Springer Author-mapper, Science Direct, Google, and journals’ websites. Findings: The Netherlands, Norway, and Poland ranked highest in terms of their OA shares. This can be attributed to the financial resources al- located to publication in general, and publishing in OA journals in par- ticular, by the countries. All developed countries and a large number of scientifically lagging and developing nations were found to publish OA articles in the APC journals. The OA papers have been exponentially growing across all the countries’ scientific groups annually. Although the advanced nations published the lion’s share of the OA-APC papers and exhibited the highest growth, the underdeveloped groups have been displaying high OA growth rates. Practical Implications: Given the reliance of the APC model on authors’ affluence and motivation, its affordability and sustainability have been challenged. This communication helps understand how countries at differ- ent scientific development and thus wealth levels contribute to the model. Originality/Value: This is the first study conducted at macro level clarify- ing countries’ contribution to the APC model—at individual and scientific- development levels—as the ultimate result of the interaction between authors’ willingness, the model affordability, and publishers and funding agencies’ support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Methodologist
    The Political Methodologist Newsletter of the Political Methodology Section American Political Science Association Volume 23, Number 1, Fall 2015 Editor: Associate Editors: Justin Esarey, Rice University Randolph T. Stevenson, Rice University [email protected] [email protected] Editorial Assistant: Ahra Wu, Rice University Rick K. Wilson, Rice University [email protected] [email protected] Contents eight political scientists comment on their experiences as au- thors, reviewers, and/or editors dealing with the scientific Notes from the Editors 1 peer review process and (in some cases) offer suggestions to improve that process. Our contributions come from authors Special Issue on Peer Review 2 at very different levels of rank and subfield specialization Justin Esarey: Introduction to the Special Issue / in the discipline and consequently represent a diversity of Acceptance Rates and the Aesthetics of Peer viewpoints within political methodology. Review . .2 Additionally, some of the contributors to this issue will Brendan Nyhan: A Checklist Manifesto for Peer participate in an online roundtable discussion on March Review . .4 18th at 12:00 noon (Eastern time) as a part of the Interna- Danilo Freire: Peering at Open Peer Review . .6 tional Methods Colloquium. If you want to add your voice Thomas J. Leeper: The Multiple Routes to Cred- to this discussion, we encourage you to join the roundtable ibility . 11 audience! Participation in the roundtable discussion is free Thomas Pepinsky: What is Peer Review For? and open to anyone around the world (with internet access Why Referees are not the Disciplinary Police 16 and a PC or Macintosh). Visit the IMC registration page Sara McLaughlin Mitchell: An Editor's Thoughts linked here to register to participate or visit www.methods- on the Peer Review Process .
    [Show full text]
  • From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2019 From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication Rob Johnson Research Consulting Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Johnson, Rob, "From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication" (2019). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 157. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/157 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Insights – 32, 2019 Plan S and the future of scholarly communication | Rob Johnson From coalition to commons: Plan S and the future of scholarly communication The announcement of Plan S in September 2018 triggered a wide-ranging debate over how best to accelerate the shift to open access. The Plan’s ten principles represent a call for the creation of an intellectual commons, to be brought into being through collective action by funders and managed through regulated market mechanisms. As it gathers both momentum and critics, the coalition must grapple with questions of equity, efficiency and sustainability. The work of Elinor Ostrom has shown that successful management of the commons frequently relies on polycentricity and adaptive governance. The Plan S principles must therefore function as an overarching framework within which local actors retain some autonomy, and should remain open to amendment as the scholarly communication landscape evolves.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Scholarship 2009 (PDF)
    DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP 2009 CHARLES W. BAILEY, JR. DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP HOUSTON, TX Digital Scholarship 2009 Copyright © 2010 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr. Cover photographs (before alteration) by NASA. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. http://www.digital-scholarship.org/ The author makes no warranty of any kind, either express or implied, for information in Digital Scholarship 2009, which is provided on an "as is" basis. The author does not assume and hereby disclaims any liability to any party for any loss or damage resulting from the use of information in Digital Scholarship 2009. Table of Contents Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography: 2009 Annual Edition 1 Dedication 1 1 Economic Issues 3 2 Electronic Books and Texts 16 2.1 Case Studies and History 16 2.2 General Works 24 2.3 Library Issues 36 3 Electronic Serials 44 3.1 Case Studies and History 44 3.2 Critiques 54 3.3 Electronic Distribution of Printed Journals 56 3.4 General Works 59 3.5 Library Issues 72 3.6 Research 90 4 General Works 115 5 Legal Issues 135 5.1 Intellectual Property Rights 135 5.2 License Agreements 163 6 Library Issues 174 6.1 Cataloging, Identifiers, Linking, and Metadata 174 6.2 Digital Libraries 204 6.3 General Works 247 6.4 Information Integrity and Preservation 265 7 New Publishing Models 296 8 Publisher Issues 341 8.1 Digital Rights Management and User Authentication 350 9 Repositories, E-Prints, and OAI 359 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Psychology
    Islamic Psychology Islamic Psychology or ilm an-nafs (science of the soul) is an important introductory textbook drawing on the latest evidence in the sub-disciplines of psychology to provide a balanced and comprehensive view of human nature, behaviour and experience. Its foundation to develop theories about human nature is based upon the writings of the Qur’an, Sunnah, Muslim scholars and contemporary research findings. Synthesising contemporary empirical psychology and Islamic psychology, this book is holistic in both nature and process and includes the physical, psychological, social and spiritual dimensions of human behaviour and experience. Through a broad and comprehensive scope, the book addresses three main areas: Context, perspectives and the clinical applications of applied psychology from an Islamic approach. This book is a core text on Islamic psychology for undergraduate and postgraduate students and those undertaking continuing professional development courses in Islamic psychology, psychotherapy and counselling. Beyond this, it is also a good supporting resource for teachers and lecturers in this field. Dr G. Hussein Rassool is Professor of Islamic Psychology, Consultant and Director for the Riphah Institute of Clinical and Professional Psychology/Centre for Islamic Psychology, Pakistan. He is accountable for the supervision and management of the four psychology departments, and has responsibility for scientific, educational and professional standards, and efficiency. He manages and coordinates the RICPP/Centre for Islamic Psychology programme of research and educational development in Islamic psychology, clinical interventions and service development, and liaises with the Head of the Departments of Psychology to assist in the integration of Islamic psychology and Islamic ethics in educational programmes and development of research initiatives and publication of research.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Our Peer Review and Publishing
    SAGE Publishing An introduction to our peer review and publishing policies Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 4 Who to contact at SAGE Publishing ....................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. Using this guide ................................................................................................................................... 4 About SAGE Publishing ....................................................................................................................... 4 SAGE’s commitment to responsible publishing................................................................................... 5 Publication ethics ............................................................................................................................. 5 Legislative and regulatory compliance............................................................................................. 5 SAGE and open access ................................................................................................................... 5 Your role as Editor .................................................................................................................................. 7 What you can expect from SAGE ........................................................................................................ 7 Commitment to editorial independence ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 University of Vermont Publications (PDF)
    University of Vermont Publications 2016 Cover Photo: Sally McCay, University Photography December 2016 Dear Colleagues and Friends, Each year we celebrate the publication achievements of our University faculty and staff, acknowledging and celebrating the excellent scholarship, exciting research, and inspiring creative work of our prolific community. This publication is a tangible expression of the vibrant academic and creative undertakings at the University of Vermont, made visible for all. The support of academic rigor and creative accomplishment is one of our highest priorities. The University has earned a reputation for academic excellence through leading-edge scholarship, research, and creative activities. These works by UVM authors, published in 2016, explore topics from the classical to the contemporary, showcasing the impressive scholarship and creative work being undertaken across the spectrum of disciplines at the University. As a research institution and land-grant university, we are proud of the many ways in which the pursuit of new knowledge undertaken here advances our society, from the local to the global. With these publications our UVM authors elevate the aspirations of peers and students, heighten the University’s national recognition, and inspire others to explore in depth the subjects and inquiries that animate their academic quests. New discoveries and fresh work nourish our community and invigorate our pursuits. These published works benefit society, enrich our teaching and learning, and underscore the high quality of education at the University of Vermont. Congratulations to our UVM authors on your accomplishments. Thank you for all that you do for this University! With every best wish, Sincerely, Tom Sullivan Catherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies
    vol. 14, no. 1 (2019) Theory and Research (peer-reviewed) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v14i1.4764 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies H. Rainer Schira Acting University Librarian Brandon University [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-8262 Chris Hurst Systems Librarian Brandon University [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-5680 Abstract Predatory publishing has risen with the development of open access publishing. This study examines how many potential predatory journals were used by Brandon University students by analyzing their bibliographies. In total, 245 bibliographies including 2,359 citations were analyzed. Of the 1,485 citations to journals in these citations, five were found to cite journals on Beall’s List of Predatory Journals and Publishers. The probable sources of these journals in the students’ bibliographies were examined. Keywords predatory publishing; open access publishing; academic libraries, bibliographic analysis Introduction This study was an attempt to quantify the presence of predatory journals in university students’ bibliographies. Predatory open access journal publishing, often shortened to Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, vol. 14, no. 1 (2019) predatory publishing, has risen with the development of open access publishing. The term was coined by Jeffrey Beall (2010), who subsequently created a list of journals and publishers that met his criteria for being predatory. In a comparative review of nine open access journal publishers, Beall (2010) used the term “predatory publisher” to describe publishers whose mission was to exploit the author-pays open access model for their own profit (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Web of Science (Wos) and Scopus: the Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World
    publications Review Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World Raminta Pranckute˙ Scientific Information Department, Library, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio˙ Ave. 14, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Abstract: Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks. Because the reliability of these tasks firstly depends on the data source, all users of the DBs should be able to choose the most suitable one. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus are the two main bibliographic DBs. The comprehensive evaluation of the DBs’ coverage is practically impossible without extensive bibliometric analyses or literature reviews, but most DBs users do not have bibliometric competence and/or are not willing to invest additional time for such evaluations. Apart from that, the convenience of the DB’s interface, performance, provided impact indicators and additional tools may also influence the users’ choice. The main goal of this work is to provide all of the potential users with an all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place. This overview should aid all stakeholders employing publication and citation data in selecting the most suitable DB. Keywords: WoS; Scopus; bibliographic databases; comparison; content coverage; evaluation; citation impact indicators Citation: Pranckute,˙ R. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Learning Environments with Knowledge Representation and Social Interaction
    Adaptive Learning Environments with Knowledge Representation and Social Interaction State of the Art, Research Proposal with Work Plan Doctoral Program in Informatics Engineering (ProDEI) Student: Joaquim Fernando Silva Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Francisco Restivo Co-Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Eugénio Oliveira December 2008 “Whoever seeks the truth is seeking God, whether consciously or unconsciously” St Teresa Benedicta of the Cross (Edith Stein) co‐Patron of Europe i Preface This technical report partially fulfils the definitive registration in the Doctoral Programme in Informatics Engineering at Engineering Faculty of Porto University, Portugal. It is a reviewed version of a first report delivered in February 2007. Since then there has been some developments in the current research and it seemed important to rewrite this document. Moreover, this research project, since January 2008, has partly been supported by a FCT grant under the reference SFRH/BD/36206/2007. Joaquim Fernando Silva ii Abstract The main topic of this research is evaluating the impact of technology usage on teaching and learning. In concrete, our research hypothesis starts with the premise that technology can be adapted to education and not the other way round in order to reach higher levels of effectiveness, when compared to using available standalone Web 2.0 tools in learning contexts. The research method started with the study of learning theories, the technological available solutions that could be used in learning contexts, in particular the social software. Some experiments have been carried out using Ning’s social software in a high school context and its outcomes gave an interesting turnout for using social networking in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Science
    22/06/2015 EuroScientist - European science conversation by the community, for the community www.euroscientist.com Open Science A EuroScientist Special Issue – June 2015 Read this post online: http://www.euroscientist.com/science-2-0 EuroScience | 1, Quai Lezay-Marnésia | F-67000 Strasbourg | France Tel +33 3 8824 1150 | Fax +33 3 8824 7556 | [email protected] | www.euroscience.org 22/06/2015 EuroScientist - European science conversation by the community, for the community www.euroscientist.com Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Welcome to this Special Issue of EuroScientist on: Open Science ! ............................................................................. 3 Editorial ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Thoughtful debate is losing ground over appearance .................................................................................................. 4 Open Science in question ................................................................................................................................................ 6 The day when science is truly open .............................................................................................................................. 6 Jean-Claude Burgelman: the new open science paradigm
    [Show full text]