DOCSLIB.ORG

Reporters Without Borders Annual Report 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reporters Without Borders Annual Report 2002 Last Updated: Monday, 14 June 2021, 06:54 GMT English | Español | Русский UNHCR Laws Case Law Country Information Browse by Resources My Profile Email this document Printable version Search Refworld Reporters Without Borders Annual Report 2002 - China by keyword Enter a word or phrase Publisher Reporters Without Borders and / or country All countries Publication Date 3 May 2002 Cite as Reporters Without Borders, Reporters Without Borders Annual Report 2002 - China, 3 May Clear Search 2002, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/487c523628.html [accessed 16 June 2021] Advanced Search | Search Tips Disclaimer This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. Countries China As a critical Congress of the Communist Party planned for 2003 draws near, the Beijing regime has started a purge of the media: at least five editors in chief have been sanctioned and twelve media censored. At the same time, police arrested sixteen cyber-dissidents. Foreign journalists are still prevented from covering sensitive Topics issues. Freedom of expression On 11 January 2001, Chinese President Jiang Zemin stated that "the news media are the spokespeople of the Party and Freedom of information the people" and that they have a duty "to educate and propagate the spirit of the Party Central Committee." According to him, this must be ensured by the "Publicity" Department (the former Propaganda Department) of the Chinese Communist Party. During the weeks following these statements, new instructions were sent to editors of the main media, saying especially that they were to concentrate on the coverage of "positive events." Sanctions are being imposed without any warning. The stakes of this purge are two-fold: avoid criticism as Jiang Zemin's departure from presidency draws near, and restructure the press to eliminate the overly independent provincial media. Fortunately, this tightened control did not lead to a wave of journalists' arrests, although some of them showed boldness by regularly testing censorship limits on sensitive topics. Several times, editorial staff overrode the Party's instructions by covering accidents, such as explosions in a mine or a school, without any authorisation. On the other hand, police have concentrated on controlling "subversive activities" on the Internet. No fewer than sixteen cyber-dissidents were arrested in 2001. As of 1 January 2002, at least fourteen journalists are still rotting in prison. Four of them have been imprisoned since the crackdown of Beijing in the spring of 1989. The Beijing regime had to speed up its media reorganisation to adapt the country's media to new competition resulting from China's entry in the World Trade Organisation (WTO). In December, China set up a huge public communication company that includes the leading public television channel, two official radio stations and some movie production companies. Its director is none other than the vice-director of the Party's "Publicity" Department. In July, the government authorised provincial authorities to sell their publications in other provinces and to develop partnerships. But these new rules shook the country. Several local authorities banned or blocked competing publications to protect their own, and especially to avoid losing control of the press their constituents read. Foreign investment in Chinese press is still forbidden, but, according to one of the managers of the new daily newspaper Jinghua Shibao, launched in May in Beijing, the country's entry in the WTO will require the government to authorise this investment. For the first time, in October, two foreign press groups (the American AOL-Time Warner and the Australian News Corp, owned by Rupert Murdoch) were authorised to broadcast television programs by cable in the Guangdong region, but under drastic conditions: these channels can only broadcast entertainment programs and must respect government rules on their content. The two press groups accepted this self-censorship, imposed by Chinese authorities, without any criticism. In January, the BBC World Service had already obtained authorisation to broadcast its programmes in hotels and residences of foreigners. In Hong Kong, self-censorship is strong but pressure from Beijing has not increased noticeably. However, the private press has been hurt by the city's economic slowdown. The weekly Asiaweek closed down in December. Finally, competition is being felt from newspapers from mainland China. In 2001, the battle for the airwaves continued between the Chinese government and international radio stations broadcasting in Mandarin, Tibetan or Uighur. Despite frequent jamming, programs in Uighur through the Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Asia (RFA) and Radio Almaty (based in Kazakhstan) are much listened to by the population of Xinjiang. In October, RFA increased their broadcasts from one to two hours per day. Programmes in Tibetan broadcast by the Voice of Tibet, VOA, BBC and RFA became the target of the authorities, who used important means to block them. Foreign radio stations are still a "breath of fresh air" for Uighurs and Tibetans. Listeners are conscious of the risks they take and usually chose to listen in secrecy. "We never get news about Xinjiang on television nor on the national radio. Just songs, dances and political propaganda. We are bombarded with the government's political opinions. It is useful to listen to diverging opinions on free radio stations," said one Uighur. However, in March, the official news agency Xinhua said that, "infiltration by hostile foreign radio stations is becoming increasingly dangerous." Instructions are strictly applied in Tibet. In November 2001, the propaganda director of the province reminded people that "at all administrative levels, the Party's newspapers must be read and studied." Control is also very strict in Inner Mongolia. Authorities are still forbidding the publication of the dissident magazine The Voice of Southern Mongolia, banned in 1995. In 2001, the Chinese government again showed its determination to prevent the foreign press from covering sensitive topics. The Chinese Communist Party denies foreign correspondents the right to investigate freely on dissidence, illegal religious movements, corruption, AIDS in Henan province, natural disasters, or Tibetan and Uighur separatists. According to the rules imposed by the Beijing regime, foreign journalists must ask the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for an authorisation to leave the capital, and this must be done in advance. Once in a province, they are placed under the control, often very strict, of local representatives of the ministry. A journalist killed On 15 January 2001, Feng Zhaoxia, journalist with the daily Gejie Daobao, published in Xian (Shanxi province), was found dead, his throat slit. One week after his body was discovered, police concluded that it was a suicide, despite assertions to the contrary by Feng's family, colleagues and local journalists' associations. According to them, this was a murder related to articles the journalist had published. According to the Guangzhou daily Yangcheng Wanbao, and the Hong Kong newspaper Ming Pao, Feng Zhaoxia had investigated the activities of local organized crime groups and had denounced complicities between these groups and some authorities. According to his wife, Feng Zhaoxia, 48 years old and father of two children, had no reason to commit suicide. On the eve of his disappearance, Feng received a phone call. He left his home and never came back. Moreover, his corpse had deep gashes in the throat and it was very unlikely that he could have cut himself that way. Feng's family and colleagues, incensed at the police's hasty conclusions, have asked several times that the case be re-opened and that a serious investigation be carried out. In addition, a few days after the murder, the province's public department of information prohibited the publication of new articles about Feng's death. Fourteen journalists jailed As of 1 January 2002, at least fourteen journalists are imprisoned. Yu Dongyue, art critic with the Liuyang News, was arrested on 23 May 1989 and sentenced to 20 years in prison. He is held in prison no. 1 in Hunan province, and suffers from serious psychological problems following long periods of isolation. Hu Liping, journalist with the Beijing Daily, was arrested on 7 April 1990 and sentenced to ten years in prison. Accused of "propaganda and counter-revolutionary incitement," he is said to be held in Beijing's prison no. 2. Chen Yanbin, co-publisher of the clandestine magazine Tielu, was arrested in late 1990 and received a double sentence: eight years in jail for "incitement to rebellion" and eight years for "spreading counter-revolutionary propaganda" in an underground magazine. The two sentences were later reduced to 15 years. In 1998, his sentence was reduced by three months for "good behaviour" by the authorities of prison no. 2 in Beijing. Zhang Yafei, co-publisher of the clandestine magazine Tielu, was arrested in September 1990 and sentenced to eleven years in jail for "spreading counter-revolutionary propaganda." Zhang is held in a "prison factory" which repairs vehicles in Jinan, capital of Shandong province. Liu Jingsheng, union leader and co-founder of the clandestine magazines Inquiries (Tansuo) and Freedom Forum, was arrested on 28 May 1992 and sentenced to fifteen years in prison for "counter-revolutionary propaganda." In 2000, his sentence was reduced by one year and one month for "good behaviour" and for "expressing regrets." Liu is held in the Banbuqiao detention center in Beijing, and suffers from gastric problems and hypertension. Ma Tao, journalist with the magazine China Education and Health News, was arrested in October 1992 and sentenced to six years in prison for "illegally disclosing state secrets to people outside of the country." Wu Shishen, journalist with the Hong Kong daily Express and the Xinhua press agency, was arrested in October 1992 and sentenced to life in prison on direct orders from President Jiang Zemin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Custody: People Imprisoned in Connection with Journalism Or the Internet
    In Custody: People Imprisoned in Connection with Journalism or the Internet The official directive from China's Propaganda Bureau this past November prohibiting the reporting of incidents of unrest indicates how threatened the Chinese authorities feel by the dissemination of accurate information regarding current events. Likewise indicative is the rash of detentions of journalists and writers at the end of 2004. While many of these detentions were temporary, they have had an intimi- dating effect on writers, and a number of those detained remain in custody awaiting formal charges. On the 2004 index of press freedom issued by Reporters sans Frontieres, China is exceeded only by North Korea and Myanmar in its censorship and persecution of journal- ists, and tops the list of countries imprisoning journalists. The list below employs a broad definition of journalism to include a wide range of activities related to free expression and access to information. Even so, the list cannot claim to be comprehensive, and there is no doubt but that many more people are languishing in prison for no crime greater than the peaceful expression of their views. Sources: HRIC, Independent Chinese PEN Center, Human Rights Watch, Reporters sans Frontìeres, Committee to Protect Journalists, International PEN, Amnesty International Abbreviations: CDP—China Democracy Party; CDF—Chinese Democratic Federation; WAF—Workers Autonomous Federation; FLUC—Free Labor Union of China; CFDP—China Freedom and Democracy Party; RTL—Reeducation Through Labor; PSB—Public Security Bureau DATE OF DETENTION/ NAME LOCATION ARREST BACKGROUND SENTENCE OFFENSE PRISON Chen Renjie Fujian Jul-83 In September 1982 Chen, Aug-83, life propaganda and incitement Lin Youping and Chen Biling to encourage the overthrow published a pamphlet entitled of the people's democratic Freedom Report and distributed dictatorship around 300 copies in Fuzhou.
    [Show full text]
  • These-Are-Our-Crimes
    Violating a press law prohibiting the publication of material considered defamatory and offensive to religion Promoting democracy Speaking out in support of women’s rights and challenging conservative religious beliefs Subversive actions against the state and collusion with the political opposition outside the country Reporting on corruption in the ruling party and on planned attacks against the political opposition; accused of being a “media terrorist” Arguing against terrorism by the state and separatists; speaking out for political and ethnic pluralism and against child soldiers and suicide bombings Running counter to the conservative dictates of the Republic Being an independent journalist These are our crimes We live in e xile CONTENTS 3 FOREWORD 4 PRESIDENT’S REPORT WRITERS IN EXILE NETWORK: THE NEW FRONTIER 16 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 28 WRITERS IN PRISON COMMITTEE REPORT 36 NATIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT 44 MINDERS 46 HONORARY MEMBERS 62 HONORARY MEMBERS RELEASED 68 MEMBERS & SUPPORTERS Sometimes freedom is only the beginning. For the writer who has been freed from prison or escaped threat in his or her homeland, exile presents a whole new set of problems. When one is estranged from friends, family and culture, with a name no one knows, exile can be a lonely, frightening place. PEN Canada has been working very hard over the past few years to develop ways to help these exiled writers make the transition to their new homes, with some encouraging success. In fact, we have been instrumental in establishing guidelines for PEN centres all over the world. We dedicate this annual report to these writers, and would like to introduce you within these pages to some of the brave men and women who have made Canada their new home.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Produced from a Tape Recording]
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER FOR NORTHEAST ASIAN POLICY STUDIES THE FUTURE OF CHINA’S MEDIA: ADAPTING TO MARKET AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS Mr. Ching-Lung Huang CNAPS Visiting Fellow, Taiwan The Brookings Institution Washington, DC November 1, 2007 [REMARKS AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY; Q&A TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED FROM A TAPE RECORDING] ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 519-7180 I. Introduction It is no simple task to provide a complete explanation of the current conditions of China’s media, not to mention to forecast its future. According to a 2007 World Press Association report, China had the highest volume of daily circulation for newspapers in the world, reaching 98.7 million copies. In comparison, the United States stands in the fourth place in the world, at 52.3 million copies. At present, there are 8,000 magazines, 700 television stations, close to 2,000 cable television stations, and 56,000 hours worth of radio programming in China. The China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) reports that by the end of 2006, the number of internet users in China reached 137 million, and is estimated to approach possibly 170 million by end of 2007, coming in second only to the United States. However, this represents only 13 percent of the total population with further room for growth. Mobile phone users in China already total 550 million, ranking it number one in the world. With only 35.4 percent market penetration, there also remains extensive room for growth. There is no doubt that the Chinese media is developing vigorously.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL PEN Writers in Prison Committee
    INTERNATIONAL PEN Writers in Prison Committee HALF-YEARLY CASELIST to 30 June 2005 International PEN Writers in Prison Committee 9/10 Charterhouse Buildings London EC1M 7AT United Kingdom Tel: + 44 020 7253 3226 Fax: + 44 020 7253 5711 e-mail: [email protected] web site: www.internatpen.org INTERNATIONAL PEN Writers in Prison Committee International PEN is the leading voice of literature worldwide, bringing together poets, novelists, essayists, historians, critics, translators, editors, journalists and screenwriters. Its members are united in a common concern for the craft and art of writing and a commitment to freedom of expression through the written word. Through its Centres, PEN operates on all five continents with 138 centres in 101 countries. Founded in London in 1921, PEN connects an international community of writers. It is a forum where writers meet freely to discuss their work. It is also a voice speaking out for writers silenced in their own countries. The Writers in Prison Committee of International PEN was set up in 1960 as a result of mounting concern about attempts to silence crit- ical voices around the world through the detention of writers. It works on behalf of all those who are detained or otherwise persecuted for their opinions expressed in writing and for writers who are under attack for their peaceful political activities or for the practice of their profession, provided that they did not use violence or advocate violence or racial hatred. Member centres of International PEN are active in campaigning for an improvement in the conditions of persecuted writers and journalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Media Law a Guide for Journalists and Media Professionals
    Hong Kong Media Law A Guide for Journalists and Media Professionals Expanded Second Edition Doreen Weisenhaus with contributions by Rick Glofcheski and Yan Mei Ning Hong Kong University Press The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong www.hkupress.org © Hong Kong University Press 2007 Expanded Second Edition, 2014 ISBN 978-988-8208-25-8 (Hardback) ISBN 978-988-8208-09-8 (Paperback) All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed and bound by Paramount Printing Co., Ltd. in Hong Kong, China Reviews for the fi rst edition of Hong Kong Media Law: A Guide for Journalists and Media Professionals “This book deserves to be the fi rst port of call for anyone seeking guidance on free speech and media law in Hong Kong . That the book fulfi lls a felt need is beyond doubt.” —The Commonwealth Lawyer, London “The book is truly the fi rst of its kind in the recent past (and) a singularly important addition to the increasing body of country-specifi c media law books in Asia . Hong Kong Media Law covers all the key topics in the area of communication law . The scholarly merit of the book is substantial.” —Kyu Ho Youm, Communications Lawyer, American Bar Association “An accessible guide to media law in Hong Kong and China .
    [Show full text]
  • Ngày Tự Do Báo Chí Quốc Tế International Press Freedom Day Ngày 3 Tháng 5 Nam Phong Tổng Hợp
    Ngày Tự Do Báo Chí Quốc Tế International Press Freedom Day Ngày 3 tháng 5 Nam Phong tổng hợp Mục Lục Ngày Tự Do Báo Chí Thế Giới – Wikipedia 2 Giải Tự Do Báo Chí Quốc Tế - Wikipedia 4 3 Nhà Báo Việt Nam Được Tổ Chức Ký Gỉa Không Biên Giới Vinh Danh “Anh Hùng Thông Tin” - Hoài Hương –VOA 9 Anh Hùng Thông Tin Năm 2014 – Nam Phong 13 1 Ngày Tự Do Báo Chí Thế Giới Bách khoa toàn thư mở Wikipedia Ngày Tự do Báo chí thế giới Ngày 3 tháng 5 Ngày Tự do Báo chí thế giới là ngày Liên Hiệp Quốc dành riêng để cổ vũ và nâng cao nhận thức về tầm quan trọng của Tự do báo chí trên toàn thế giới. Mục lục 1 Lịch sử 2 Ngày Tự do Báo chí thế giới và các chủ đề 3 Tham khảo 4 Liên kết ngoài Lịch sử Theo đề nghị của Tổ chức Giáo dục, Khoa học và Văn hóa Liên Hiệp Quốc, ngày 20.12.1993 Đại Hội đồng Liên Hiệp Quốc đã công bố ngày 3 tháng 5 là "Ngày Tự do Báo chí thế giới" (Nghị quyết số 48/432)[1][2] để nâng cao nhận thức về tầm quan trọng của tự do báo chí và nhắc nhở các chính phủ về bổn phận phải tôn trọng và duy trì quyền tự do ngôn luận theo Điều 19 của Tuyên ngôn Quốc tế Nhân quyền và đánh dấu ngày kỷ niệm Tuyên ngôn Windhoek, một tuyên ngôn về những nguyên tắc tự do báo chí do các nhà báo châu Phi đưa ra năm 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTACKS O N T H E Press in 2009
    A Worldwide Survey by the Committee to Protect Journalists ATTACKS o n t h e press in 2009 Preface by fareed zakaria Founded in 1981, the Committee to Protect Journalists responds to attacks THE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS on the press worldwide. CPJ documents hundreds of cases every year and takes action on behalf of journalists and news organizations without board of directors regard to political ideology. To maintain its independence, CPJ accepts no government funding. CPJ is funded entirely by private contributions from Chairman Honorary Co-Chairmen executive director individuals, foundations, and corporations. Paul E. Steiger Walter Cronkite (1916-2009) Joel Simon Terry Anderson The Associated Press, Thomson Reuters, and Agence France-Presse provided news and photo services for Attacks on the Press in 2009. directors Andrew Alexander Michael Massing Associated Press Franz Allina Geraldine Fabrikant Metz Christiane Amanpour Victor Navasky Editorial Director: Bill Sweeney Dean Baquet Andres Oppenheimer Deputy Editor: Lauren Wolfe Kathleen Carroll Burl Osborne Designer: Justin Goldberg Rajiv Chandrasekaran Clarence Page Chief Copy Editor: Lew Serviss Sheila Coronel Norman Pearlstine Copy Editor and Proofreader: Shazdeh Omari Josh Friedman Ahmed Rashid Anne Garrels Dan Rather Photo credits James C. Goodale Gene Roberts Cover: Reuters/Oswaldo Rivas—Honduran police surround AP photographer Cheryl Gould María Teresa Ronderos Dario Lopez-Mills as he covers protests that followed the June presidential coup. Charlayne Hunter-Gault Sandra Mims Rowe Back cover: AP/Bullit Marquez—Protesters in Manila call for justice in the mass killings of journalists and others in Maguindanao province, Philippines. Gwen Ifill Diane Sawyer Jane Kramer David Schlesinger David Laventhol Paul C.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Challenge: Sino-Canadian Relations in the 21St Century
    The China Challenge The China Challenge Sino-Canadian Relations in the 21st Century edited by Huhua Cao and Vivienne Poy University of Ottawa Press Ottawa University of Ottawa Press 542 King Edward Avenue Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 www.press.uottawa.ca Th e University of Ottawa Press acknowledges with gratitude the support extended to its publishing list by Heritage Canada through its Book Publishing Industry Development Program, by the Canada Council for the Arts, by the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences through its Aid to Scholarly Publications Program, by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and by the University of Ottawa. © University of Ottawa Press 2011 All rights reserved. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Th e China challenge : Sino-Canadian relations in the 21st century / edited by Huhua Cao and Vivienne Poy. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-7766-0764-1 1. Canada--Foreign relations--China. 2. China--Foreign relations--Canada. I. Cao, Huhua, 1961- II. Poy, Vivienne, 1941- FC251.C5C55 2011 327.71051 C2011-901927-2 Acknowledgements First of all, we would like to thank all the contributors for their extraordi- nary collaboration on this volume. It has given us a unique chance to work on this important project, examining the relationship between Canada and China during the past forty years. With the exception of the relationship with the United States, Canada’s relationship with China is likely to be its most signifi cant foreign connection in the 21st century. In that light, this book has the potential both to be very useful to those studying the relation- ship and to make an important impact on policy-makers in both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Control in China 2004 .4, No Rights Forum
    MEDIA CONTROL IN CHINA 2004 .4, NO RIGHTS FORUM BY HE QINGLIAN CHINA Following are translated excerpts from a have suffered persecution, and briefly enumerate some other 11 book-length report written by He Qinglian and cases I have come across in recent years. It should be noted, however, that because this type of pressure and persecution is published in Chinese by HRIC. Media Control not made public, the evidence presented here is far from com- OPE in China describes how China’s much-lauded prehensive. economic modernization has allowed the gov- Generally speaking, the central government controls the media by means of political power and a series of top-down ernment to camouflage its pervasive control coercive policies. Local governments, lacking the supreme under the glossy façade of consumerism, power and authority of the central government, rely on a mul- tiplicity of control methods: on their own local media they can with a shift from ham-fisted censorship to an exert direct political control. In respect of reporters outside ALKING THE TIGHTR elaborate architecture of Party supervision, their jurisdiction, they exert control either directly through W amorphous legislation, stringent licensing violence or indirectly through what Chinese officialdom com- monly refers to as “saying hello”—exerting pressure on offi- mechanisms, handpicked personnel and con- cials from the reporters’ place of origin to bring the offending centrated media ownership. The following organs into line. two excerpts examine control through the Control is directed first of all at sources of information, in recognition of the fact that, in the words of the American intimidation of journalists and restrictions on media scholar Melvin Mencher,“News sources are a journal- media ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE November 17, 2005 the Threat of Saddam Hussein, the Ple of Burma Live in the Darkness of Tyr- Case
    27062 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE November 17, 2005 the threat of Saddam Hussein, the ple of Burma live in the darkness of tyr- case. A total of 186 media people (112 journal- same way that President Bush was anny—but the light of freedom shines in ists, 3 assistants and 71 cyber-dissidents) are making those estimates. their hearts. They want their liberty—and imprisoned in 23 countries. What crimes have The Robb-Silberman commission one day, they will have it. they committed? They have revealed sen- sitive issue, called for democracy and great- found Presidential daily briefings to These words should ring loudly and clearly throughout the region. I com- er respect for individual freedoms, refused to contain similar intelligence in ‘‘more give in to censorship or to an enforced line of alarmist’’ and ‘‘less nuanced’’ lan- mend President Bush for these com- thought. In short, they simply tried to do guage. Continuing to quote: ments and for the solid leadership he their jobs. As problematic as the October 2002 [Na- provides in supporting freedom in In an appeal for solidarity with imprisoned tional Intelligence Estimate] was, it was not Burma. Moreover, I applaud the efforts journalists, Reporters Without Borders is or- the Community’s biggest analytic failure on made by President Bush and Secretary ganizing the 16th consecutive annual day of Iraq. Even more misleading was the river of Rice to put Burma on the U.N. Secu- action. We are urging the worldwide news intelligence that flowed from the CIA to top rity Council’s agenda. media- throughout the world— to acknowl- policymakers over long periods of time—in edge the fate of those who have to struggle the President’s Daily Brief and in its more f every day for the right to report the news.
    [Show full text]
  • A PDF of This Newsletter
    China Human Rights and February 2006 Rule of Law Update Subscribe United States Congressional-Executive Commission on China Senator Chuck Hagel, Chairman | Representative Jim Leach, Co-Chairman Message from the Chairman Internet Censorship in China Recently, U.S. Internet companies operating in China censored certain material offered by their Internet service. The Commission is concerned that these actions were made in response to a threat of commercial or criminal reprisals by the Chinese government, not in an effort to comply with Chinese law. This government-compelled censorship denies Chinese citizens the fundamental right to freedom of expression guaranteed in their Constitution. Any restrictions placed on this right by the Chinese government must be openly legislated and transparently applied. This is the minimum requirement for a society based on the rule of law. Announcements Translation: Second Five Year Reform Program The Congressional-Executive Commission on China has prepared a translation of the Second Five Year Reform Program for the People's Courts (2004-2008). Update on Rights and Law in China Human Rights Updates Rule of Law Updates All Updates Chinese Authorities Indict New York Times Researcher Zhao Yan The New York Times reported on December 23 that Chinese authorities have indicted Zhao Yan, a researcher at its Beijing bureau, on charges of revealing state secrets and fraud. Agents from the Ministry of State Security detained Zhao on September 17, 2004, and authorities formally arrested him in October 2004 for "providing state secrets to foreigners." In June 2005, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) confirmed that on May 20 authorities had transferred his case to the Beijing procuratorate for prosecution both for providing state secrets to foreigners and for fraud.
    [Show full text]
  • PEN International's 2019 Case List
    The PEN International Case List 2019 COVER: A woman speaks through a megaphone during the protest. BANDUNG, INDONESIA - 2020/03/08: A woman speaks through a megaphone during the protest. International Womens Day is an official holiday for women. Women from various organizations took to the PEN International Case List streets, protesting against the women’s inequality and sexual violence. (Photo by Algi Febri Sugita/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Charter Methodology The PEN Charter is based on resolutions passed at PEN International gathers its information from a About PEN International its International Congresses and may be summarised wide variety of sources and seeks to confirm its as follows: information through at least two independent sources. Where its information is unconfirmed, it will either take PEN International promotes literature and freedom of expression and is governed by no action, or word its outputs to reflect the fact that the PEN Charter. Founded in London in 1921, PEN International – PEN’s Secretariat – PEN affirms that: the information is as yet incomplete. Sources include connects an international community of writers. It is a forum where writers meet freely press reports, reports from individuals in the region in to discuss their work; it is also a voice speaking out for writers silenced in their own • Literature knows no frontiers and must remain question, reports from other human rights groups, PEN countries. Through Centres in over 100 countries, PEN operates on five continents. common currency among people in spite of political members themselves, embassy officials, academics, PEN International is a non-political organisation which holds Special Consultative or international upheavals.
    [Show full text]