DOCSLIB.ORG

Falling Short As the 2008 Olympics Approach, China Falters on Press Freedom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Falling Short As the 2008 Olympics Approach, China Falters on Press Freedom Falling Short As the 2008 Olympics Approach, China Falters on Press Freedom A special report of the Committee to Protect Journalists Issued August 2007 Founded in 1981, the Committee to Protect Journalists responds to attacks on the press worldwide. CPJ documents hundreds of cases every year and takes action on behalf of journalists and news organizations without regard to po- litical ideology. To maintain its independence, CPJ accepts no government funding. CPJ is funded entirely by private contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. Falling Short: As the 2008 Olympics Approach, China Falters on Press Freedom Editorial Director: Bill Sweeney Designer: Justin Goldberg Copy Editor: Barbara Ross Proofreader: Joe Sullivan Cover photo credits: Clockwise from top left: soldiers (Reuters); Hu Jintao (Agence France-Presse); stadium construction (Reuters); cam- era operator (Agence France-Presse); reporters (Associated Press). Back cover: photographers (Associated Press). © 2007 Committee to Protect Journalists, New York All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Honorary Co-Chairman Chairman Honorary Co-Chairman Executive Director Walter Cronkite Paul E. Steiger Terry Anderson Joel Simon The Wall Street Journal DIRECTORS Andrew Alexander Gwen Ifill Clarence Page Cox Newspapers PBS Chicago Tribune Franz Allina Steven L. Isenberg Norman Pearlstine The Carlyle Group Christiane Amanpour Jane Kramer CNN The New Yorker Erwin Potts Dean Baquet David Laventhol McClatchy Newspapers The New York Times Anthony Lewis Dan Rather Tom Brokaw HDNet David Marash NBC News Al-Jazeera English Gene Roberts Sheila Coronel Philip Merrill College of Journalism, Kati Marton Graduate School of Journalism, University of Maryland Columbia University Michael Massing Sandra Mims Rowe Josh Friedman Geraldine Fabrikant Metz The Oregonian Graduate School of Journalism, The New York Times John Seigenthaler Columbia University Victor Navasky The Freedom Forum Anne Garrels The Nation First Amendment Center National Public Radio Andres Oppenheimer Paul C. Tash James C. Goodale The Miami Herald St. Petersburg Times Debevoise & Plimpton Burl Osborne Mark Whitaker Cheryl Gould The Dallas Morning News NBC News NBC News Charles L. Overby Matthew Winkler Charlayne Hunter-Gault The Freedom Forum Bloomberg News About this Report ts that Inhibit he bulk of this report was researched and written by Kristin Jones, senior Asia research associate Tfor the Committee to Protect Journalists, and Bob Dietz, CPJ’s Asia program coordinator. The reporting is based on interviews with Chinese journalists, lawyers, and academics conducted during Jones’ research trips to China in March 2006 and April 2007, along with research and interviews conducted from CPJ’s New York offices. The report follows a November 2006 meeting between representatives of CPJ and the Interna- tional Olympic Committee at IOC headquarters in Lausanne, Switzerland. CPJ board member Jane Kramer and Jones met with Olympic Games Executive Director Gilbert Felli and IOC Communica- tions Director Giselle Davies to urge them to do more to ensure that Chinese authorities fulfill their promises of media freedom in the run-up to the Olympic Games in Beijing in 2008. CPJ research shows that domestic journalists continue to face severe threats and restrictions. This report is a further attempt to describe these conditions in detail and to make known our recommendations for change. CPJ gratefully acknowledges the vital work of several contributing writers. Chapter 3, “Commerce and Control: The Media’s Evolution,” was written by David Bandurski, a freelance writer and media expert based in Hong Kong. Ashley Esarey, a political science professor at Middlebury College in Ver- mont who has written extensively about the Chinese media, wrote the Chapter 5 sidebar, “The Media Managers.” Esarey also provided guidance for Chapter 5, “Censorship at Work: The Newsroom in China.” Jonathan Watts, Beijing correspondent for The Guardian of London, wrote Chapter 10, “An Open- ing: Foreign Media See Gains.” Jocelyn Ford wrote the sidebar for that chapter, titled “Guidelines for Reporters on the Ground.” Ford, head of the press freedom committee of the Foreign Correspon- dents Club of China, has reported from Beijing for U.S. public radio since 2002 and for state-run China Radio International in 2001. CPJ Deputy Director Robert Mahoney wrote the Chapter 9 side- bar, “Writing (Ethical) Code.” CPJ research assistant May Yang compiled the Chapter 2 quotations, “What They Said,” and the Chapter 3 timeline, “Politics and the Press.” CPJ also wishes to acknowledge the important research by Benjamin Liebman of the Columbia University School of Law and Chen Zhiwu of the Yale Uni- versity School of Management, which is cited in Chapter 7, “The Libel Card: Suits That Inhibit.” For information about China’s Internet policies, CPJ drew from research conducted by OpenNet Initia- tive, a collaborative partnership of four academic institutions. Particularly valuable was OpenNet’s 2005 study of Internet filtering in China. We are grateful to Li Datong for allowing us to reprint excerpts of his May 2007 address to the Society of Publishers in Asia, and to Pu Zhiqiang for allowing use of his letter in defense of clients Chen Guidi and Wu Chuntao. Translations of many Chinese laws and regulations were provided by the firm TransAsia Lawyers, the firm TransPerfect, and the Congressional-Executive Commission on China. We are also grateful to Roland Soong, New Century Net, and TransPerfect for other translations used in this report. New Century Net graciously granted reprint rights to Cheng Yizhong’s 2005 remarks in acceptance of the 2005 Guillermo Cano Award. Soong’s blog, EastSouthWestNorth, was an important source through- out. Table of Contents ts that Inhibit Preface 1 Summary 8 2 Words and Deeds: Confronting the Contradictions 10 What They Said 12 3 Commerce and Control: The Media’s Evolution 14 Politics and the Press: A Timeline 15 4 Inwardly Restricted: Domestic Repression Remains 18 An Editor’s View: Tunneling Through Stone 21 5 Censorship at Work: The Newsroom in China 24 The Media Managers 26 Directing the News 29 6 Local Threats: The Bureaucrat’s Tyranny 31 Common Sense as a Weapon 32 7 The Libel Card: Suits That Inhibit 35 Waiting for a Verdict 36 8 ‘Secrets’ and Subversion: The Limits of Expression 38 The Spy Trap 40 9 Online Rules: A Study in Paradox 42 Writing (Ethical) Code 44 10 An Opening: Foreign Journalists See Gains 46 Guidelines for Reporters on the Ground 47 11 Recommendations 50 12 Appendix I: Constitutional and International Guarantees 52 Article 35 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China 52 Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 52 Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 52 Appendix II: Media Law in China 53 Excerpts of the Regulations for the Administration of Publishing 53 Excerpts of the Regulations for the Administration of Radio and Television 55 Excerpts of the Provisional Rules for the Administration of Online Publishing 56 Excerpts of the Provisions on Administration of Internet News Information Services 58 Excerpts of the Secrecy Rules in Respect of News Publishing 60 Full Text of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Guarding State Secrets 61 Excerpts of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China 65 Full Text of the Regulations on Reporting Activities in China by Foreign Journalists During the Beijing Olympic Games and their Preparatory Period 68 Full Text of the Rules for Taiwan Reporters Reporting in the Mainland During the Beijing Olympic Games and their Preparatory Period 69 Full Text of the Rules for Hong Kong and Macau Reporters Reporting Inland During the Beijing Olympic Games and their Preparatory Period 70 Appendix III: Journalists Imprisoned in China 71 Preface espite explosive economic growth and more Internet users than any country besides the United States, DChina remains backward in allowing its people access to news. Deep concern about China’s lack of press freedom and scant regard for the rights of journalists prompted the Committee to Protect Journalists to write this report as China prepares to host the 2008 Olympic Games. Just one year before the world’s finest athletes fill Beijing, China is holding at least 29 reporters and editors behind bars because of their work. Most are imprisoned on vague security-related charges such as revealing state secrets or inciting subversion of state power. Relying on such catchall accusations, China has led the world in the number of jailed journalists since 1999. Despite knowing this record, the International Olympic Committee in 2001 awarded the August 2008 Games to China. The negotiations and agreement between China and the IOC have not been made public, but both sides assured skeptics that all journalists would have unrestricted freedom to cover the Games. More broadly, the scenario put forward by friends of the IOC and of the Chinese government was that, buoyed by Olympic ideals, China would grow away from its insistence on tight government control of the flow of information and its harsh punishment of those who dare to work outside that system. Under this scenario, the media, unfettered for the Games, would continue to be freer after the world’s attention moved on. That broad opening has not happened, although China lifted some restrictions on foreign journal- ists in January 2007. In fact, since the Games were awarded, media restrictions ordered by the govern- ment and the Communist Party have grown. Cen- sors still issue day-to-day “guidance” on exactly what can be reported in print, on the air, and on the Internet in all its manifestations—Web sites, blogs, message boards, discussion groups, and even instant messaging and texting. Pro- longed detentions and closed-door trials of jour- nalists have continued as well. That China so far has failed to fulfill its pledges on press freedom is not news to local reporters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Introduction Chinese Citizens Continue to Face Substantial Obstacles in Seeking Remedies to Government Actions That Violate Th
    1 ACCESS TO JUSTICE Introduction Chinese citizens continue to face substantial obstacles in seeking remedies to government actions that violate their legal rights and constitutionally protected freedoms. International human rights standards require effective remedies for official violations of citi- zens’ rights. Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that ‘‘Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the funda- mental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.’’ 1 Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which China has signed but not yet ratified, requires that all parties to the ICCPR ensure that persons whose rights or free- doms are violated ‘‘have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.’’ 2 The Third Plenum and Judicial Reform The November 2013 Chinese Communist Party Central Com- mittee Third Plenum Decision on Certain Major Issues Regarding Comprehensively Deepening Reforms (Third Plenum Decision) con- tained several items relating to judicial system reform.3 In June 2014, the office of the Party’s Central Leading Small Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reform announced that six provinces and municipalities—Shanghai, Guangdong, Jilin, Hubei, Hainan, and Qinghai—would serve as pilot sites for certain judicial reforms, including divesting local governments of their control over local court funding and appointments and centralizing
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICO, John Harris and Carrie Budoff Brown
    STATEMENTS FROM NEWS ORGS EXCLUDED – POLITICO, John Harris and Carrie Budoff Brown: “We’ve reached out to the White House, and rest assured that we plan to very vigorously assert and defend an independent media’s right to cover the institution of the Presidency. Selectively excluding news organizations from White House briefings is misguided and our expectation is that this action will not be repeated. We have one of the largest teams in Washington covering this White House—a major editorial and financial commitment on behalf of our audience. This commitment is an enduring one, and our coverage of the Trump Administration will of course continue without interruption.” --WASHPOST, Marty Baron: “It’s appalling that the White House would exclude news outlets like the New York Times, CNN, Politico, the Los Angeles Times, and BuzzFeed from its publicly announced briefings. This is an undemocratic path that the administration is traveling. There is nothing to be gained from the White House restricting the public’s access to information. We are currently evaluating what our response will be if this sort of thing happens again." – Marty Baron, Washington Post. --NYT, Dean Baquet: “Nothing like this has ever happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple administrations of different parties. We strongly protest the exclusion of The New York Times and the other news organizations. Free media access to a transparent government is obviously of crucial national interest.” --BUZZFEED: “While we strongly object to the White House’s apparent attempt to punish news outlets whose coverage it does not like, we won’t let these latest antics distract us from continuing to cover this administration fairly and aggressively.” --CNN: “This is an unacceptable development by the Trump White House.
    [Show full text]
  • 28. Rights Defense and New Citizen's Movement
    JOBNAME: EE10 Biddulph PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Fri May 10 14:09:18 2019 28. Rights defense and new citizen’s movement Teng Biao 28.1 THE RISE OF THE RIGHTS DEFENSE MOVEMENT The ‘Rights Defense Movement’ (weiquan yundong) emerged in the early 2000s as a new focus of the Chinese democracy movement, succeeding the Xidan Democracy Wall movement of the late 1970s and the Tiananmen Democracy movement of 1989. It is a social movement ‘involving all social strata throughout the country and covering every aspect of human rights’ (Feng Chongyi 2009, p. 151), one in which Chinese citizens assert their constitutional and legal rights through lawful means and within the legal framework of the country. As Benney (2013, p. 12) notes, the term ‘weiquan’is used by different people to refer to different things in different contexts. Although Chinese rights defense lawyers have played a key role in defining and providing leadership to this emerging weiquan movement (Carnes 2006; Pils 2016), numerous non-lawyer activists and organizations are also involved in it. The discourse and activities of ‘rights defense’ (weiquan) originated in the 1990s, when some citizens began using the law to defend consumer rights. The 1990s also saw the early development of rural anti-tax movements, labor rights campaigns, women’s rights campaigns and an environmental movement. However, in a narrow sense as well as from a historical perspective, the term weiquan movement only refers to the rights campaigns that emerged after the Sun Zhigang incident in 2003 (Zhu Han 2016, pp. 55, 60). The Sun Zhigang incident not only marks the beginning of the rights defense movement; it also can be seen as one of its few successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Change Journalism in China: Opportunities for International
    Climate-change journalism in China: opportunities for international cooperation By Sam Geall Foreword by Hu Shuli 中国气候变化报道： 国际合作中的机遇 山姆·吉尔 序——胡舒立 Climate-change journalism in China: opportunities for international cooperation 中国气候变化报道：国际合作中的机遇 © International Media Support 2011. Any reproduction, modification, publication, transmission, transfer, sale distribution, display or exploitation of this information, in any form or by any means, or its storage in a retrieval system, whether in whole or in part, without the express written permission of the individual copyright holder is prohibited without prior approval by IMS. Cover image by Angel Hsu. © 国际媒体支持组织 版权所有 2011 任何媒体、网站或个人未经“国际媒体支持组织”的书面许可，不得引用、复 制、转载、摘编、发售、储存于检索系统，或以其他任何方式非法使用本报告全 部或部分内容。 封面照片由徐安琪摄。 International Media Support (IMS) Communications Unit, Nørregade 18, Copenhagen K 1165, Denmark Phone: +4588327000, Fax: +4533120099 Email: [email protected] www.i-m-s.dk Caixin Media Floor 15/16, Tower A, Winterless Center, No.1 Xidawanglu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100026, P.R.China http://english.caing.com/ chinadialogue Suite 306 Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT, United Kingdom Phone: +442073244767 Email: [email protected] www.chinadialogue.net Climate-change journalism in China: opportunities for international cooperation By Sam Geall1 Foreword by Hu Shuli2 p4 1. Sam Geall is deputy editor of chinadialogue. The author acknowledges generous contributions to the research and analysis in this report from Li Hujun, Wang Haotong, Eliot Gao and Lisa Lin. Essential input and support were also provided by Martin Breum, Martin Gottske, Isabel Hilton, Tan Copsey, Li Dawei, Ma Ling, Hu Shuli, Bruce Lewenstein and Jia Hepeng. 2. Hu Shuli is editor-in-chief of Caixin Media (the Beijing-based media group that publishes Century Weekly and China Reform), the former founding editor of Caijing magazine and a prominent investigative journalist and commentator.
    [Show full text]
  • Hu Jia on Behalf of the Silenced Voices of China and Tibet
    Sakharov Prize 2008 Year for China Hu Jia On behalf of the silenced voices of China and Tibet Hu Jia and his wife, Zeng Jinyan, were nominated for last year's Sakharov Prize and were among the final three short-listed candidates. Hu Jia was consequently imprisoned and remains in prison to this day. Hu Jia is a prominent human rights activist who works on various issues including civil rights, environmental protection and AIDS advocacy. He was arrested shortly after his testimony on 26 November 2007 via conference call before the European Parliament's sub-committee on Human Rights. In his statement, he expressed his desire that 2008 be the “year of human rights in China”. He also pointed out that the Chinese national security department was creating a human rights disaster with one million people persecuted for fighting for human rights and many of them detained in prison, in camps or mental hospitals. He also said: "The irony is that one of the people in charge of organising the Olympics is the head of the Public Security Bureau in Beijing who is responsible for so many human rights violations. The promises of China are not being kept before the games." As a direct result of his address to members of the European Parliament, Hu Jia was arrested, charged with "inciting subversion of state power", and sentenced on 3 April 2008 to three-and-a-half years' in jail with one year denial of political rights. He was found guilty of writing articles about the human rights situation in the run-up to the Olympic Games.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Foreign Policy Dilemma
    February 2013 ANALYSIS LINDA JAKOBSON China’s Foreign Policy Program Director East Asia Dilemma Tel: +61 2 8238 9070 [email protected] E xecutive summary Foreign policy will not be a top priority of China’s new leader Xi Jinping. Xi is under pressure from many sectors of society to tackle China’s formidable domestic problems. To stay in power Xi must ensure continued economic growth and social stability. Due to the new leadership’s preoccupation with domestic issues, Chinese foreign policy can be expected to be reactive. This may have serious consequences because of the potentially explosive nature of two of China’s most pressing foreign policy challenges: how to decrease tensions with Japan over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands and with Southeast Asian states over territorial claims in the South China Sea. A lack of attention by China’s senior leaders to these sovereignty disputes is a recipe for disaster. If a maritime or aerial incident occurs, nationalist pressure will narrow the room for manoeuvre of leaders in each of the countries involved in the incident. There are numerous foreign and security policy actors within China who favour Beijing taking a more forceful stance in its foreign policy. Regional stability could be at risk if China’s new leadership merely reacts as events unfold, as has too often been the case in recent years. LOWY INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY 31 Bligh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Tel: +61 2 8238 9000 Fax: +61 2 8238 9005 www.lowyinstitute.org The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent policy think tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Anonymous Sources: More Or Less and Why and Where?
    Southwestern Mass Communication Journal A journal of the Southwest Education Council for Journalism & Mass Communication ISSN 0891-9186 | Vol. 30, No. 2 | Spring 2015 Anonymous Sources: More or less and why and where? Hoyt Purvis University of Arkansas Anonymous sources have been important factors in some of the major news stories of our time. But does this reliance on unnamed sources to too far? The use and possible abuse of anonymous sources is a matter of continuing controversy in the media and can have a direct bearing on the credibility of the media. Questions related to the use of such sources are examined in a study of the use of anonymous sources in 14 daily editions of three daily newspapers, focusing on the quantity of articles using anonymous sources, their subject matter, location, and rationale for using unnamed sources. This is done within the context of the ongoing controversy about the reliance on such sources in major news organizations. Results of this study are reported and analyzed and provide some clear indications about the extent and nature of the use of anonymous sources, and point to a possible over-dependence and problematic trend. Suggested citation: Purvis, H. (2015). Anonymous sources: More or less and why and where?. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 30(2). Retrieved from http://swecjmc.wp.txstate.edu. The Southwestern Mass Communication Journal Spring 2015 V. 30, No. 2 The Southwestern Mass Communication Journal (ISSN 0891-9186) is published semi-annually by the Southwest Education Council for Journalism and Mass Communication. http://swmcjournal.com Also In This Issue: Anonymous Sources: More or less and why and where? Hoyt Purvis, University of Arkansas Are You Talking To Me? The Social-Political Visual Rhetoric of the Syrian Presidency’s Instagram Account Steven Holiday & Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Requiring Videotaped Interrogations Has Broad Support from Law
    Requiring Videotaped Interrogations Has Broad Support From law enforcement: • "We don't object to any recordation of interviews or interrogations which would result in a clearer picture of what the defendant or the witness told the police officer. After all, it is our firm belief that in an extraordinarily overwhelming number of cases, the information being reported out of those cases is accurate and correct, and we believe that a recording would help us to prove that." - Jim Pasco, Executive Director, Fraternal Order of Police (NPR Tavis Smiley Show, Jan. 17, 2003.) • "Police and prosecutors have little to fear from a requirement to videotape all interrogations. Recording not only protects the innocent, it helps convict the guilty and sustain the public's faith in our criminal justice system." - Amy Klobuchar, Hennepin County, MN, County Attorney (Klobuchar, "Eye on Interrogations: How Videotaping Serves the Cause of Justice," Washington Post op-ed, June 10, 2002.) • "' [The tapes] usually corroborate and bolster the police version [ of an interrogation and confession.]" - Kankakee County, IL, State Attorney Edward Smith (Eric Zorn, "A Surprise Vote for Videotaping Interrogations," Chicago Tribune, Apr. 19, 2001.) • "[I]f it's done right, there is no more powerful evidence then a videotaped confession there for the defense and the public to see." -Capt. Barney Forsythe, Director of Montgomery County, MD, Police Department Major Crimes Division. (April Witt, "Md. Weighs Taping Police Interviews; Videos Dispel Questions on Tactics," Washington Post, Feb. 12, 2002.) • "Unfortunately, people have come to believe the worst of the police. It is incumbent on those ofus who are interested in bringing back faith in the system to do things that show the integrity of what police and prosecutors do to build a case.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Jim Hely of Westfield Transit Village Review CONTINUED from PAGE 1 CONTINUED from PAGE 1 State Officials Are Present, “The Town Them,” Ms
    Ad Populos, Non Aditus, Pervenimus Published Every Thursday Since September 3, 1890 (908) 232-4407 USPS 680020 Thursday, July 23, 2009 OUR 119th YEAR – ISSUE NO. 30-2009 Periodical – Postage Paid at Westfield, N.J. www.goleader.com [email protected] SIXTY CENTS Despite Reports, Westfield Not Pursuing Transit Village Status By MICHAEL J. POLLACK hoods where people can live, shop, very quickly” and noted that a transit Specially Written for The Westfield Leader work and play without relying on village designation is “not front and WESTFIELD – Despite reports to automobiles.” Towns such as center” on the mayor or council’s the contrary, the Town of Westfield is Cranford, Morristown and South Or- agenda. not pursuing a Transit Village desig- ange are considered transit villages. Mayor Andy Skibitsky confirmed nation at present. Though it may study While reports of Downtown that the “impromptu” and “last- the “appropriateness” of such a des- Westfield Corporation (DWC) Ex- minute” meeting took place, but he ignation in the future, town officials ecutive Director Sherry Cronin lead- said there is “no directive to pursue refuted a report that said the town was ing the Transit Village Taskforce on a this…it will never happen without “eyeing” the matter seriously. tour of the town two Fridays ago are mayor and council approval.” According to the New Jersey De- accurate, Frank Arena, the Westfield While the mayor said there was partment of Transportation (DOT) Town Council’s DWC liaison, said it “nothing wrong” with meeting with website, the Transit Village initiative was an “impromptu” meeting. the taskforce, it is not something his creates incentives for municipalities Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the West Learn from the Rest?' the Chinese Legal Order's Hybrid
    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Other Publications Faculty Scholarship 2009 Can the West Learn from the Rest?' The hineseC Legal Order's Hybrid Modernity Nicholas C. Howson University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/other/4 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/other Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Howson, Nicholas C. "'Can the West Learn from the Rest?' The hineC se Legal Order's Hybrid Modernity." Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 32, no. 2 (2009): 815-30. This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Panel IV - "Can the West Learn from the Rest?" - The Chinese Legal Order's Hybrid Modernityt By NICHOLAS CALCINA HOWSON* I am asked to present on the "shortcomings of the Western model of legality based on a professionalized, individualistic and highly formalistic approach to justice" as a way to understanding if "the West can develop today a form of legality which is relational rather than based on litigation as a zero sum game, learning from face to face social organizations in which individuals understand the law" - presumably in the context of the imperial and modem Chinese legal systems which I know best as a scholar and have lived for many years as a resident of the modem identity of the center of the "Chinese world," the People's Republic of China ("PRC").
    [Show full text]
  • People's Republic of China Briefing on EU Concerns Regarding Human Rights in China Prepared for EU-China Summit 5 September 2005
    People's Republic of China Briefing on EU concerns regarding human rights in China Prepared for EU-China Summit 5 September 2005 In May of this year, representatives of the European Union decided to delay a move to lift the arms embargo against China, citing human rights concerns. They referred specifically to four areas of concern that would affect future consideration in lifting the embargo: the need for Chinese authorities to release citizens imprisoned in connection with the suppression of the 1989 pro-democracy movement; the need for reform of China’s “Re-education through Labour” (RTL) system; the need for the PRC to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); and the need to ease media censorship. Amnesty International welcomes the fact that the EU has made the lifting of its embargo contingent on human rights reform and has detailed specific areas for improvement. In this briefing Amnesty International presents an update on developments in these four areas in the lead-up to the EU-China Summit in September, 2005. Amnesty International urges the EU to take these factors and other human rights concerns into consideration in its ongoing analysis of the human rights situation in China. Release of those imprisoned in connection with 1989 pro-democracy protests A core issue raised by EU representatives as an area of human rights concern is the continued detention of individuals imprisoned for their connection to the 1989 pro-democracy movement. The EU arms embargo was imposed on 27 June 1989 as a direct response to the armed suppression by the Chinese military of the peaceful protests calling for democracy and political reforms in and around Tiananmen Square in Beijing on 3-4 June.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Band and Panel Listings Inside!
    THE STROKES FOUR TET NEW MUSIC REPORT ESSENTIAL October 15, 2001 www.cmj.com DILATED PEOPLES LE TIGRE CMJ MUSIC MARATHON ’01 OFFICIALGUIDE FEATURING PERFORMANCES BY: Bis•Clem Snide•Clinic•Firewater•Girls Against Boys•Jonathan Richman•Karl Denson•Karsh Kale•L.A. Symphony•Laura Cantrell•Mink Lungs• Murder City Devils•Peaches•Rustic Overtones•X-ecutioners and hundreds more! GUEST SPEAKER: Billy Martin (Medeski Martin And Wood) COMPLETE D PANEL PANELISTS INCLUDE: BAND AN Lee Ranaldo/Sonic Youth•Gigi•DJ EvilDee/Beatminerz• GS INSIDE! DJ Zeph•Rebecca Rankin/VH-1•Scott Hardkiss/God Within LISTIN ININ STORESSTORES TUESDAY,TUESDAY, SEPTEMBERSEPTEMBER 4.4. SYSTEM OF A DOWN AND SLIPKNOT CO-HEADLINING “THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TOUR” BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 SEE WEBSITE FOR DETAILS CONTACT: STEVE THEO COLUMBIA RECORDS 212-833-7329 [email protected] PRODUCED BY RICK RUBIN AND DARON MALAKIAN CO-PRODUCED BY SERJ TANKIAN MANAGEMENT: VELVET HAMMER MANAGEMENT, DAVID BENVENISTE "COLUMBIA" AND W REG. U.S. PAT. & TM. OFF. MARCA REGISTRADA./Ꭿ 2001 SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC./ Ꭿ 2001 THE AMERICAN RECORDING COMPANY, LLC. WWW.SYSTEMOFADOWN.COM 10/15/2001 Issue 735 • Vol 69 • No 5 CMJ MUSIC MARATHON 2001 39 Festival Guide Thousands of music professionals, artists and fans converge on New York City every year for CMJ Music Marathon to celebrate today's music and chart its future. In addition to keynote speaker Billy Martin and an exhibition area with a live performance stage, the event features dozens of panels covering topics affecting all corners of the music industry. Here’s our complete guide to all the convention’s featured events, including College Day, listings of panels by 24 topic, day and nighttime performances, guest speakers, exhibitors, Filmfest screenings, hotel and subway maps, venue listings, band descriptions — everything you need to make the most of your time in the Big Apple.
    [Show full text]