Anishing Architects, Shifting Nations. Writing the History of Bohemian
DOI: 10.17401/STUDIERICERCHE-1/2017-DEMEYER anishing architects, shifting nations. WritingV the history of Bohemian Baroque architecture,1880-1945 DIRK DE MEYER Ghent University (1) An earlier version of the first part of this paper was published in Dirk De Meyer, Writing architectural history and building a Czechoslovak nation, 1887-1918, in: Jacek Purchla and Wolf Issues of nation and language in the architectural history writing of Bohemia Tegethoff, eds., Nation, Style, Modernism, CIHA Conference and Moravia – those Habsburg provinces now more or less confined by the Papers 1. München, Zentralinstitut für Kunstgeschichte,/Com- ité Internaional d’histoire de l’art (CIHA), 2006, 75-93. Unless borders of the Czech Republic – occurred to me in a rather serendipitous way otherwise indicated, translations are mine. as the result of my interest in Czech history in general, and in the writings of Nikolaus Pevsner, “Bohemian Hawksmoor”, Architectural Re- Czech and German architectural historians of the late nineteenth and the early view, CXXI, nr. 721 (1957), 112-114: 114. twentieth century in particular. Both interests originated from my research on (2) Dirk De Meyer, Johann Santini Aichel – architectuur en am- the Bohemian architect Johann Santini Aichel, who was active in the first 23 biguïteit, 2 vols., (Eindhoven, Technische Universiteit, 1997). Dirk De Meyer, “Highbrow and popular: liturgy, devotion and years of the eighteenth century and was a Prague contemporary of the Vien- design in Santini Aichel’s Nepomuk Church in Zd’ar”, in Pro- nese Johann Bernhard Fischer von Erlach. I began to study Santini because ceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the European I was intrigued by the stubborn and anachronistic plastic qualities of his build- Architectural History Network Brussels, Koninklijke Vlaamse ings.
[Show full text]