DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign Policy of Middle East States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign Policy of Middle East States DAILY SCHEDULE Wednesday, September 2, 2015 Wednesday, 1:30 PM to 5:30 PM APSA Short Course Wednesday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM 6.1 SHORT COURSE: BUILDING INTERNATIONAL APSA Events SCHOLARLY PARTNERSHIPS 1.1 APSA COUNCIL MEETING Part: M. Anne Pitcher, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 6.2 SHORT COURSE: COMPARATIVE APPROACHES Wednesday, 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM TO THE CITY APSA Short Course Part: Jeffrey W. Paller, Bates College 2.1 SHORT COURSE: DEPARTMENT LEADERSHIP Alisha Caroline Holland, Harvard University Part: Priscilla M. Regan, George Mason University Yanilda Maria Gonzalez, Harvard Kennedy School 2.2 SHORT COURSE: DESIGNING AND Loren Landau, The Fletcher School & Feinstein CONDUCTING FIELD RESEARCH International Center Tariq Thachil Part: Benjamin L. Read, University of California, Santa Cruz Jacqueline Klopp Naazneen Barma, Naval Postgraduate School Nicholas Rush Smith, City College of New York 2.3 SHORT COURSE: POLITICS, MARKETS, AND Shelby Grossman, Harvard University ORGANIZED INTERESTS - NEW QUESTIONS Sarah El-Kazaz, Oberlin College ABOUT POWER, POLICY, AND INFLUENCE Christopher Gore, Ryerson University Part: Edward T. Walker, University of California, Los Angeles 6.3 SHORT COURSE: DESIGNING MULTI-METHOD 2.4 SHORT COURSE: PUBLIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH Part: Kelly LeRoux, University of Illinois, Chicago Part: Jason Seawright, Northwestern University 2.5 SHORT COURSE: RANKED CHOICE VOTING IN 6.4 SHORT COURSE: PLAYING GAMES WITH ( THE U.S.A.: DEVELOPMENTS AND DEBATES THEORIES OF ) POLITICAL VIOLENCE Part: Sarah E. John Part: Victor Asal, University at Albany, SUNY 2.6 SHORT COURSE: THE CANADIAN POLITICAL 6.5 SHORT COURSE: POLITICS AT APSA - NEW SYSTEM AND ELECTION 2015 POLITICAL SCIENCE, ANTI-APARTHEID Part: Tony L. Hill, MIT MOVEMENTS, AND ISRAEL/PALESTINE APSA Events Part: C. Heike Schotten, University of Massachusetts Boston 3.1 DA-RT MEETING leila farsakh, --University of Massachusetts Boston 6.6 SHORT COURSE: PROCESS TRACING Wednesday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Part: Andrew Bennett APSA Short Course 6.7 SHORT COURSE: THE METHODS STUDIO – 4.1 SHORT COURSE: COALITION BUILDING TO DATA ACCESS AND RESEARCH ADVANCE DIVERSE LEADERSHIP AND TRANSPARENCY FROM AN INTERPRETIVE- ADDRESS DISCRIMINATION IN POLITICAL QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVE SCIENCE Part: Sarah E. Parkinson, University of Minnesota Part: Carol A. Mershon, University of Virginia Dvora Yanow, Wageningen University Denise Marie Walsh, University of Virginia Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, University of Utah 4.2 SHORT COURSE: POLIINFORMATICS TEXT AS 6.8 SHORT COURSE: THE ROLE OF SCHOLAR- DATA WORKSHOP ACTIVISM: HOW POLITICAL SCIENTISTS CAN Part: John D. Wilkerson, University of Washington BOLSTER RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS 4.3 SHORT COURSE: POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY Part: Sekou M. Franklin, Middle Tennessee State University Part: Leonie Huddy, SUNY, Stony Brook 6.9 SHORT COURSE: THE STATE OF THE FIELD IN FEDERALISM/IGR RESEARCH: APPROACHES 4.4 SHORT COURSE: POLITICAL SCIENCE IN THE TO DESIGN, DATA, MEASUREMENT, AND PUBLIC ARENA: COMMUNICATION ANALYSIS STRATEGIES FOR SCHOLARS Part: Kathleen Hale, Auburn University 4.5 SHORT COURSE: THE 2015 BRITISH GENERAL Paul Manna, College of William & Mary ELECTIONS: TRANSITION OR CRISIS? 6.10 SHORT COURSE: UNDERSTANDING Part: Janet M. Laible, Lehigh University COMPLEXITY - RESEARCH APPLICATIONS 4.6 SHORT COURSE: WHAT WORKS? FOR POLICY & POLITICAL SCIENCE Schedule Daily STRENGTHENING ELECTORAL INTEGRITY Part: Liz Johnson Part: Pippa Pippa Norris, Harvard University Wednesday, 6:30 PM to 8:30 PM Wednesday, 11:00 AM to 5:00 PM APSA Events APSA Events 7.1 APSA AWARDS CEREMONY 5.1 PARTY PERSONNEL STRATEGY WORKSHOP DAILY SCHEDULE 1 X : 51614$TEST 05-20-15 04:29:46 Layout: 51614N : 5001 Page 1 Wednesday, 6:30 PM to 8:30 PM Thursday, September 3, 2015 Division Panels DIVISION 1: POLITICAL THOUGHT AND PHILOSOPHY: Thursday, 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM HISTORICAL APPROACHES APSA Events 10.1 ACROSS THE REVOLUTIONARY DIVIDE: 8.1 FIRST-TIME ATTENDEE BREAKFAST RETHINKING NINETEENTH-CENTURY POLITICAL THOUGHT 8.2 MINORITY STUDENT RECRUITMENT Chair: Jacob T. Levy, McGill University PROGRAM (MSRP) MEETING Papers: The Turn to Positivism in International Law Thursday, 8:00 AM to 9:45 AM Jennifer Pitts, University of Chicago Theme Panels Toleration and Freedom of Discussion across the 9.1 IS ANYBODY LISTENING? POLITICAL Centuries SCIENCE, THE NEW MEDIA AND POLITICS Gregory Andrew Conti, Harvard University Co-sponsored by DIVISION 38: POLITICAL Between Justice and Gratitude: Thomas Paine and the COMMUNICATION Dilemmas of Private Property Chair: Alvin B. Tillery, Northwestern University Alexander H. Gourevitch, Brown University Part: Joshua A. Tucker, New York University Francois Guizot and the Challenge of Creating French Karthick Ramakrishnan, University of California, Parliamentary Government Riverside William Selinger Christina M. Greer, Fordham University DIVISION 1: POLITICAL THOUGHT AND PHILOSOPHY: 9.2 MARGINALIZATION, INCLUSION AND THE HISTORICAL APPROACHES FUTURE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE: A PANEL 10.2 DEMOCRATIC THEORIZING: PAST AND HONORING DAVID EASTON PRESENT Chair: Kristen Renwick Monroe, University of California, Co-sponsored by DIVISION 2: FOUNDATIONS OF Irvine POLITICAL THEORY Part: John H. Aldrich, Duke University Co-sponsored by DIVISION 3: NORMATIVE POLITICAL Matthew Holden, University of Illinois, Springfield THEORY Rodney E. Hero, University of California, Berkeley Disc: Lars Toender, University of Copenhagen Juan Carlos Huerta, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Papers: Acting Out: A Performative Perspective on Democracy Valerie Lehr, St. Lawrence University Liron Lavi Dianne M. Pinderhughes, University of Notre Dame Choosing to Burn the Trojan Horse: Theorizing Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott, Eastern Michigan University “Militant Democracy” Laura E Sjoberg, University of Florida Benjamin A. Schupmann, Columbia University 9.3 NEW THEORIES AND EVIDENCE ON LABOR Encountering the Masses: Two Liberal Responses to POLITICS Democracy Co-sponsored by DIVISION 6: POLITICAL ECONOMY Kyong-Min Son, University of Delaware Chair: Clayton M. Nall, Stanford University Populism, Demagogical Representation and the Crisis of Disc: John Stephen Ahlquist, University of Wisconsin, European Democracy Madison Nico De Federicis, University of Pisa Paul Frymer, Princeton University Dorian T. Warren, Columbia University DIVISION 1: POLITICAL THOUGHT AND PHILOSOPHY: HISTORICAL APPROACHES 10.3 REPUBLICANISM: MARKETS AND FREEDOM Papers: Endogenous Institutions: Evidence from Public Sector Collective Bargaining Laws Co-sponsored by DIVISION 3: NORMATIVE POLITICAL THEORY Agustina S Paglayan, Stanford University Disc: Richard K. Dagger, University of Richmond Demography is Destiny: Revisiting the Decline of Organized Labor Frances Zlotnick, Stanford University Papers: The French Model of Republican Democracy Genevieve Rousseliere Strong Unions, Strong Welfare State? Evidence across Sectors and States Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought Olivia Meeks, UC Berkeley Robert S. Taylor, University of California, Davis Informality, Enforcement Traps, and the Workers’ Party Unfree Agents: Domination, Freedom, and in Brazil Responsibility German Feierherd, Yale University William Clare Roberts, McGill University Partisanship, Interest Groups, and Labor Market Policy DIVISION 1: POLITICAL THOUGHT AND PHILOSOPHY: in Latin America HISTORICAL APPROACHES Federico Fuchs, University of North Carolina at 10.4 REVISITING ROUSSEAU Chapel Hill Disc: Joseph R. Reisert, Colby College Papers: Economic Inequality and Rousseau's General Will David Lay Williams, DePaul University Kant, Rousseau, and the Arts and Sciences Sidney Simpson, University of Notre Dame 2 DAILY SCHEDULE X : 51614$TEST 05-20-15 04:29:46 Layout: 51614N : Even Page 2 Thursday, 8:00 AM to 9:45 AM Rousseau and Madame de Staël: A Fascinating DIVISION 3: NORMATIVE POLITICAL THEORY Intellectual Dialogue 10.8 AGENCY, RESPONSIBILITY, AUTONOMY Aurelian Craiutu, Indiana University Papers: Ethical Autonomy Rousseau's Amour-Propre: A Neo-Augustinian Lucas Swaine, Dartmouth College Deconstruction of Liberal Democracy Political Responsibility: Realism and Political Agency Michael L. McLendon, California State University, Farid Abdel-Nour, San Diego State University Los Angeles The Contributions of Victims to Justice DIVISION 2: FOUNDATIONS OF POLITICAL THEORY Chris Tenove, University of Toronto 10.5 BODY POLITICS The Agency Game: Who is Responsible for Resolving Co-sponsored by DIVISION 31: WOMEN & POLITICS Global Challenges? Chair: Jill L. Locke, Gustavus Adolphus College Ilari Aula, London School of Economics and Political Disc: Rachel Sanders, University of Washington Dept of Science Political Science DIVISION 3: NORMATIVE POLITICAL THEORY Kristy King, Arizona State University 10.9 DISABLED CITIZENSHIP Chair: Nancy J. Hirschmann, University of Pennsylvania Papers: An Ethnography of Embodiment: Diversifying Method Anita Chari Disc: Nancy J. Hirschmann, University of Pennsylvania Beauvoir’s political fictions - linking embodied affect to Papers: Reconsidering the Disability Rights Movement commitment. Claire C. McKinney, Washington University in St. Elaine Stavro, Trent University Louis Materiality and "The Marxism Question" in the Work of Disability and the Production of Scientific Knowledge Simone de Beauvoir Kristin Bumiller, Amherst College Sonia Kruks, Oberlin College The Worth of Disability and the Question of Disabled Suffering the Word: Agonistic Fellowship in the Divine Citizenship Missive Ann Kathleen Heffernan, The University of Chicago Elizabeth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Philosophers Rise and Empires Fall in the Work of Leo Strauss
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2019 Ungodly Freedom: How Philosophers Rise and Empires Fall in the Work of Leo Strauss Eli Karetny The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2819 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] UNGODLY FREEDOM: HOW PHILOSOPHERS RISE AND EMPIRES FALL IN THE WORK OF LEO STRAUSS by Eli Karetny A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 © 2018 Eli Karetny All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. PROFESSOR COREY ROBIN _________________ ____________________________________ Date Committee Chair _______________ PROFESSOR ALYSON COLE Date ____________________________________ Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Corey Robin Alyson Cole Carol Gould THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract UNGODLY FREEDOM: HOW PHILOSOPHERS RISE AND EMPIRES FALL IN THE WORK OF LEO STRAUSS by Eli Karetny Advisor: Professor Corey Robin This dissertation argues that to fully understand the work of Leo Strauss, scholars must look beyond the Platonic and Machiavellian elements in Strauss and explore how Nietzsche’s ideas about nihilism, the will to power, the eternal return, and the ubermensch influence Strauss’s critique of modernity, his understanding of the relationship between philosophy and politics, and his redefinition of the philosopher as a prophetic lawgiver.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Economy's Surprising Rise
    Is the pope Catholic? Why Modi’s win matters The remaking of Microsoft A message from outer space MARCH 18TH–24TH 2017 On the up The world economy’s surprising rise Contents The Economist March 18th 2017 3 6 The world this week United States 29 Welfare Leaders American exceptionalism 9 The world economy 30 Counter-terrorism On the rise Loosening the rules 10 Modi triumphs 31 Prison labour Uttar hegemony A $1bn industry 10 Dutch elections 32 Chuck’s gun shop Domino theory Anything you want 11 Brexit and Scotland 32 Missing servicemen Scoxit Scots should read Leave one union, lose Raiders of the lost barks Brexit as an argument for another 34 Lexington remaining in Britain, not 12 Aid to fragile states Health care: a presidential deal breaker leaving it: leader, page 11. On the cover The Central African Scotland’s first minister A synchronised upturn in the conundrum demands a new referendum, world economy is under way. The Americas page 57 Thank stimulus, not the Letters 35 Mexico populists: leader, page 9. 14 On Brexit, the news, The rise of a populist What lies behind the Chile, Singapore, 36 Bello improvement, pages 18-20. diamonds Mauricio Macri’s gradualism As Janet Yellen’s Fed raises rates, political uncertainty 38 Guatemala hangs over the central bank, Briefing Deaths foretold page 69 18 The world economy From deprivation to Middle East and Africa daffodils 39 Central African Republic The Economist online Another CAR crash Daily analysis and opinion to Asia 40 South Sudan supplement the print edition, plus Death spiral Dutch elections Geert audio and video, and a daily chart 21 South Korea Economist.com Park impeached 40 Libya’s war Wilders’s poor showing does Coastal retreats not necessarily mean that E-mail: newsletters and 22 Gambling in Australia 41 South Africa and Russia Marine Le Pen will lose: leader, mobile edition The biggest losers Say my name page 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatism in America Syllabus 2020
    Am I conservative? Does that conservative hate me? Why do conservatives say things like that? What does conservatism really mean anymore? Conservativism in America: Spring 2020 2019 was quite the year for conservatives. India, Japan, and the United Kingdom all joined the United States, Brazil, and George Ehrhardt Poland in electing Right-wing governments. Worldwide, the Anne Belk 351J median voter is now a populist conservative. 262-6920 [email protected] What does this mean? What do these conservatives believe? How do they behave politically? These are difficult questions; Class time too often we hear shallow, one-dimensional answers. Answers MWF: 10-11 from those on the Right demand loyalty to their own particular Anne Belk 223 brand of conservatism to the exclusion of all others. Answers from those on the Left sound like 19th Century colonial Office Hours: ethnographers, titillating their metropolitan readers with Mon: 11:00-12:00 curiosities from Darkest Africa Flyover Country. Instead of Wed: 11:00-12:00 giving you answers head-on, though, I want to sneak up on Thur: 2:00-4:00 them from behind, so they don’t run away and hide in the noise and fury of today’s politics. You have grown up in an American educational system where what might be called a ‘liberal worldview’ is normative--in other words, that worldview is taken as Right and Good and Just. You may have had teachers who disagreed, and your parents may have objected, but fundamentally, liberal ideas about what it means to be human and how we live together form the foundation on which acceptable ideas about politics and society are built.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journal of Political Thought and Statesmanship the Way We Hate Now by William Voegeli
    VOLUME XVIII, NUMBER 4, FALL 2018 A Journal of Political Thought and Statesmanship The Way We Hate Now by William Voegeli Andrew C. McCarthy: Michael Anton: Christopher Caldwell: Impeachment Trump & What is Populism? the Philosophers James W. Ceaser: David P. Goldman: Jonah Goldberg John M. Ellis: Woodrow Wilson e Diversity Delusion Joseph Epstein: Allen C. Guelzo e American Amy L. Wax: Charles R. Kesler: Language Gender Police Harry V. Jaa at 100 A Publication of the Claremont Institute PRICE: $6.95 IN CANADA: $8.95 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Book Review by Matthew Continetti Sources of the Reagan Doctrine Paving the Way for Reagan: The Influence of Conservative Media on U.S. Foreign Policy, by Laurence R. Jurdem. University Press of Kentucky, 278 pages, $45 ver since herbert croly and walter nfluence, after all, is a rather slip- up, and especially the Reagan Doctrine of sup- Lippmann founded the New Republic in pery concept. Are editors and writers whis- port for anti-Communist guerrillas, reflected E1914 to guide the ascendant Progressive Ipering in politicians’ ears? Or do their ar- Burnham’s policy of rolling back Soviet gains administration of Woodrow Wilson, journals ticles reflect the politicians’ agendas? When rather than simply containing them. Reagan of political opinion have come to be associat- Henry Kissinger served in the Nixon White awarded the presidential Medal of Freedom ed with presidents of similar ideological bent. House, for example, his close friend William to Burnham and (posthumously) to NR se- During Bill Clinton’s two terms the New Re- F. Buckley, Jr., nior editor, and author of Witness, Whittaker public became known as “the in-flight magazine Chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ur-Fascism and Neo-Fascism
    The Journal of International Relations, Peace Studies, and Development Volume 5 Issue 1 The Journal of International Relations, Article 2 Peace Studies, and Development 2019 Ur-Fascism and Neo-Fascism Andrew Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.arcadia.edu/agsjournal Recommended Citation Andrew Johnson (2019) "Ur-Fascism and Neo-Fascism," The Journal of International Relations, Peace Studies, and Development: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.arcadia.edu/agsjournal/vol5/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@Arcadia. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Journal of International Relations, Peace Studies, and Development by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@Arcadia. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Journal of International Relations, Peace and Development Studies A publication by Arcadia University and the American Graduate School in Paris Ur-Fascism and Neo-Fascism Andrew Johnson Abstract: Fascism was once a momentous and imperative subject of study, but as the memory of atrocity faded there has been a lessening of stakes and a forgetting of its previous import. The election of Donald J. Trump, along with the Brexit referendum, growing support for economic nationalism, and a global rise of authoritarian populists, has revitalized the “fascism question,” both by scholars and the general public. The reemergence (and electoral successes) of far-right ideological partisans threatens the neoliberal consensus, challenging received wisdom within political science. The dominant approach within international political economy failed to predict escalating political opposition to global capitalism. A prescient exception is the heterodox scholar William Robinson, who had warned his readers of emergent 21st century fascism.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions and 187 Last-Minute Appointments
    Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions And 187 Last-Minute Appointments SUMMARY: Following the outgoing administration’s “quiet push to salt federal agencies with Trump loyalists,” an Accountable.US review has found that, as of February 22, 2021, at least 24 Trump administration political appointees have “burrowed” into long-term civil service jobs in the new Biden administration. This includes at least four figures in the national security apparatus, nine figures with environmental regulators, three figures in the Department of Justice, two figures in the embattled Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and at least six other appointees elsewhere who have refused to step down in the transition. Burrowing of this sort is not treated lightly, as officials who transfer from political appointments to career positions must undergo scrutiny by federal personnel overseers for a full five years—and some of these cases have been found to violate federal laws and have drawn congressional scrutiny. However, there is a much wider slate of concerning Trump administration appointments that are not subject to such strict oversight: During the Trump administration’s waning days following the 2020 election, it announced 187 last-minute appointments to various boards, commissions, and councils that don’t require Senate confirmation. While some of these appointments have already drawn alarm for going to campaign staffers, megadonors, and top administration allies, Accountable.US has unearthed even more troubling names in Trump’s outgoing deluge. Similar to how early Trump administration personnel picks were directly conflicted against the offices they served, many of these late Trump appointments are woefully underqualified or have histories directly at odds with the positions to which they were named—and they are likely to stay in long into the Biden administration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns
    The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns Hopkins University [email protected] Sam Rosenfeld Colgate University [email protected] Version of January 2019. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association meetings. Boston, Massachusetts, August 31, 2018. We thank Dimitrios Halikias, Katy Li, and Noah Nardone for research assistance. Richard Richards, chairman of the Republican National Committee, sat, alone, at a table near the podium. It was a testy breakfast at the Capitol Hill Club on May 19, 1981. Avoiding Richards were a who’s who from the independent groups of the emergent New Right: Terry Dolan of the National Conservative Political Action Committee, Paul Weyrich of the Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress, the direct-mail impresario Richard Viguerie, Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum and STOP ERA, Reed Larson of the National Right to Work Committee, Ed McAteer of Religious Roundtable, Tom Ellis of Jesse Helms’s Congressional Club, and the billionaire oilman and John Birch Society member Bunker Hunt. Richards, a conservative but tradition-minded political operative from Utah, had complained about the independent groups making mischieF where they were not wanted and usurping the traditional roles of the political party. They were, he told the New Rightists, like “loose cannonballs on the deck of a ship.” Nonsense, responded John Lofton, editor of the Viguerie-owned Conservative Digest. If he attacked those fighting hardest for Ronald Reagan and his tax cuts, it was Richards himself who was the loose cannonball.1 The episode itself soon blew over; no formal party leader would follow in Richards’s footsteps in taking independent groups to task.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2020 Report
    Fall 2020 Report Pictured: Judge Amy Coney Barrett with Professor Robert P. George, October 11, 2019. Judge Barrett visited the James Madison Program to deliver the annual Walter F. Murphy Lecture in American Constitutionalism on “The Constitution as Our Story.” Contents Program Updates 02 Current Visiting Fellows 03 Madison’s Notes Podcast 04 Looking Back: The First 20 Years 06 Academic Year 2019-20 09 About the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions Initiative on Politics and Statesmanship 12 Founded in the summer of 2000, the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions in the Department of Politics at Princeton University is dedicated to exploring Undergraduate Fellows Forum 13 fundamental and enduring questions of political thought and constitutional law. The James Madison Program promotes a greater appreciation of the Western tradition of legal and political 2020-21 Lecture Series and Events 17 thought. It also supports the application of fundamental principles to modern social problems, particularly as they are manifested in the domain of public law. By supporting the study of foundational issues, the James Madison Program seeks to fulfill its mandate of offering civic “The Challenge to ‘Brain Death’: Are We Taking Organs from Living Human education of the highest possible quality. Beings, and If We Are, Does It Matter?” A panel discussion cosponsored by the Center for Human Values, featuring (from L to R): Peter Singer, Princeton James Madison, a graduate of Princeton University, was the principal architect of the University; Patrick Lee, Franciscan University of Steubenville; D. Alan Shewmon, Constitution and fourth President of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Studies Centre 2015 Annual Review
    United States Studies Centre 2015 Annual Review APPOINTMENTS Mark Baillie Chairman Mark Baillie was appointed as Chairman of the Centre’s Board of Directors. Baillie has been a member of the USSC board since April 2014 and a director of the American Australian Association since 2012. He is non-executive deputy chairman of Folkestone Limited, an ASX-listed real estate funds management, investment, and development company. Formerly he was the head of European and North American real estate for Macquarie Group Limited, which included five years based in Chicago. Baillie acted as Executive Chairman of the USSC from November 2015 whilst the search for a successor for CEO Bates Gill was conducted. Dr Aaron Nyerges Lecturer in American Studies Aaron Nyerges is a Lecturer in American Studies at the US Studies Centre. He has a PhD in English Literature from the University of Sydney and a BA from the State University of New York. His articles have been accepted and published in Textual Practice, Sydney Studies in English, and Sound Studies. He is writing a book on American modernism and spatial modernity. Adjunct Associate ProFessor Elsina WainwrigHt Non-Resident Fellow, Alliance 21 Program Dr Elsina Wainwright is an adjunct associate professor at the USSC and a non-resident fellow in its Alliance 21 Program. Based in New York, she is also a visiting senior fellow at New York University's Center on International Cooperation. Previous roles include director of the strategy and international program at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, an associate with McKinsey & Company, a consultant political analyst for the International Crisis Group, and a stipendiary lecturer in politics at Oriel College, Oxford University.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of CONSERVATIVE FOREIGN POLICY November 30, 2018
    Texas National Security Review POLICY ROUNDTABLE: THE FUTURE OF CONSERVATIVE FOREIGN POLICY November 30, 2018 Table of Contents 1. “Prompt Essay: The Future of Conservative Foreign Policy,” by Colin Dueck 2. “The Struggle for Conservative Foreign Policy,” by Elliott Abrams 3. “Libertarianism, Restraint, and the Bipartisan Future,” by Emma Ashford 4. “The Trump Doctrine: The Future of Conservative Foreign Policy,” by John Fonte 5. “Freedom, Defense, and Sovereignty: A Conservative Internationalist Foreign Policy,” by Henry R. Nau 6. “The Conservative Realism of the Trump Administration's Foreign Policy,” by Nadia Schadlow 7. “Six Decades Without a Conservative Foreign Policy,” by Kelley Beaucar Vlahos 8. “A Conservative Foreign Policy: Drawing on the Past, Looking to the Future,” by Dov S. Zakheim Policy Roundtable: The Future of Conservative Foreign Policy https://tnsr.org/roundtable/policy-roundtable-the-future-of-conservative-foreign-policy/ - article Texas National Security Review 1. The Future of Conservative Foreign Policy By Colin Dueck The Trump era has triggered an intense, yet useful discussion on the political right and center-right about the proper direction of American foreign policy. Conservatives within the United States — like Americans generally — have oscillated between realist and idealist interpretations of world affairs, just as they have between military intervention and non- intervention, always trying to find the right balance. But American conservatives have also made these choices in their own characteristic ways. In particular, a recurring tension has long existed between placing emphasis on national versus international priorities. Conservative nationalists have tended to stress U.S. sovereignty,1 while conservative internationalists have tended to stress the need for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Forest College Stentor
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lake Forest College Publications Lake Forest College Lake Forest College Publications Stentor Student Publications Spring 4-27-2020 Lake Forest College Stentor Follow this and additional works at: https://publications.lakeforest.edu/stentor Recommended Citation "Lake Forest College Stentor" (2020). Stentor. Vol. 135, No. 8. https://publications.lakeforest.edu/stentor/749 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at Lake Forest College Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Stentor by an authorized administrator of Lake Forest College Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. News FBI Chicago Warns Against COVID-19 Scammers and Hackers By Emma Overton ’21 Editor-in-Chief and News Editor [email protected] As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to worsen— with 776,093 positive cases and 41,758 deaths recorded in the United States as of April 21, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—scammers are using the resulting disruption in our daily lives to defraud victims. As thousands of college students across the country have returned home and transitioned to online learning, scammers are targeting their email inboxes and Zoom meetings. In a virtual press conference on April 2, FBI Chicago Special Agent and Public Affairs Officer Siobhan Johnson spoke about the ways that scammers and hackers are targeting all Americans, and how individuals and college students, in particular, can protect themselves online. Noting “even as society is shutting down, scammers are gearing up,” Johnson outlined the ways in which cybercriminals are taking advantage of online users.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Days of Trump's America: a Timeline 18
    100 DAYS IN TRUMP'S AMERICA WHITE NATIONALISTS AND THEIR AGENDA INFILTRATE THE MAINSTREAM a report by the southern poverty law center © 2017 ABOUT THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER The Southern Poverty Law Center, based in Montgomery, Alabama, is a nonpartisan 501(c) (3) civil rights organization founded in 1971 and dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, and to seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of society. For more information about THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER visit www.splcenter.org 2 100 days in trump's america CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TAKES SHAPE 7 100 DAYS REPORT PROFILES 9 THE CONSPIRACY THEORIST-IN-CHIEF: TRUMP AND THE MAINSTREAMING OF THE RADICAL RIGHT 14 100 DAYS OF TRUMP'S AMERICA: A TIMELINE 18 HOW YOU CAN PARTICIPATE IN OUR DEMOCRACY 26 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 28 southern poverty law center 3 4 100 days in trump's america WHITE NATIONALISTS AND THEIR AGENDA INFILTRATE THE MAINSTREAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As he spoke to the nation on Jan. 20, President Donald Trump reminded white nationalists why they had invested so much hope in him as their champion and redeemer. He painted a bleak picture of America: a nation of crumbling, third-world infrastructure, “rusted-out factories,” leaky borders, inner cities wallowing in pov- erty, a depleted military and a feckless political class that prospered as the country fell into ruin. He promised an “America First” policy that would turn it all around. “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now,” Trump declared. The inaugural address echoed the themes of a campaign that had electrified the white nationalist – or “alt-right” – movement with its promise to stop all Muslim travelers at the border and deport millions of undocumented immigrants – killers and “rapists,” Trump called them.
    [Show full text]