DOCSLIB.ORG

Speech by Senior Minister of State for Defence Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman at the SAFTI International Cadets' Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Speech by Senior Minister of State for Defence Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman at the SAFTI International Cadets' Conference Speech by Senior Minister of State For Defence Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman at The SAFTI International Cadets' Conference 13 Dec 2019 TRUST AND REGIONAL SECURITY: RESPONSE TO A VOLATILE, UNCERTAIN, COMPLEX AND AMBIGUOUS (VUCA) WORLD A very good evening commanders, cadets and welcome to all our cadets from the overseas countries, distinguished participants of this SAFTI International Cadets' Conference (SICC) 2019. The SICC aims to be the platform of choice to bring together future military leaders from 18 countries to share perspectives on pertinent issues of our time today, forge lasting bonds and friendships, as well as strengthen the common ground amongst our armed forces. It is very timely that young people like yourselves, future commanders are coming together to think about the future that will affect all of you I also hope that the camaraderie that you have established with one another will seed the trust and mutual understanding amongst the leaders of our militaries of tomorrow, which you all will be. And with that, I hope that our countries will continue to enjoy the fruits of closer partnership and stronger mutual understanding for yet another generation. I want to start off this evening by sharing with you, the historical perspectives of where we were, where we are and where we can go. Setting Aside Differences: A Historical Context As military officers, you know very well your role and the significance of the military to your own respective countries and of course to us in Singapore. Historically, militaries have been associated with conflict. Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 For example, even in our region, frequent clashes and contestations had marked more than two centuries of rivalry between the British and the Dutch in this part of the world between the 1600s and the 1800s. Incidentally for those who are not aware, Singapore commemorates its 200 years or our Bicentennial this year. At that time, British intentions to establish a trading post on Singapore had agitated the Dutch, who since 1816, had resumed control of the East Indies. They interpreted British actions as an encroachment into their sphere of influence, and what followed was a period of intense territorial and trade disputes between both countries in a region far away from their own. Then came the turning point, after several years of negotiations between both governments. An agreement was eventually reached in the 1824 Treaty of London, and in the spirit of setting aside differences for mutual benefit, both powers also agreed to allow free communication between the locals of their ports, and cooperate in the suppression of piracy. Despite World War I and the resulting tension between colonial powers and their colonies, the region - our region here continued to enjoy more than a hundred years of relative peace and prosperity - up until it was surrendered to the Japanese during the Second World War. Formation of ASEAN In the years following the end of the Second World War, the region was filled with tensions and conflicts. Two sources of friction were evident then. Firstly, every country had a bone to pick with its neighbours over historical overlapping territorial claims or ideological differences. Secondly, ongoing world events and the power vacuum caused by the British withdrawal meant that major powers had the opportunity and vested interest in gaining a degree of influence in the region. To cite an example: Konfrontasi was borne out of Indonesia's non-acceptance of Malaysia's formation, of which Singapore was a part of. And this conflict even extended to the MacDonald House Bombing in 1965. Singapore would go on to execute the bombers in 1968 despite Indonesia's objections, and this was a point of contention and disagreement between the two nations. Our late founding Prime Minister, Mr Lee Kuan Yew stressed the inviolable need to uphold our sovereignty, but also recognised the need to set aside this episode for the better of the region. So the turning point came when Mr Lee made his first official visit to Indonesia in May 1973, when he and the late Bapak Suharto, the president of Indonesia then, decided for Indonesia and Singapore to move forward together. In a larger Cold War context, Southeast Asia was an area of contestation between the United States and the Soviet Union. In Indo-China, the Vietnam War was raging on, with the North and the South supported by the Communist powers (Soviet Union and China), and the United States and its allies respectively. Many other countries also had to deal with communist elements brewing within their country's government, being pressured to align themselves with one major power or the other, and thus in different ideological camps at times. However, one of the most pivotal moments in Southeast Asian history was how the region came together in unity, having recognised that it was vital for our survival in the international arena. This common understanding then saw the original five founding members of ASEAN - Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Singapore - band together to push for regional peace and stability. A regional organisation like ASEAN enabled differences and territorial disputes to be set aside for the greater good of a better future. The foreign minister of Thailand at the time, and co-founder of ASEAN, Tun Thanat Khoman stated the crucial need "to erase the old and obsolete concept of domination and subjection of the past and replace it with the new spirit of give and take, of equality and partnership." Since the signing of the 1967 Bangkok Declaration that led to the birth of ASEAN, three principles have transcended time. First: members of ASEAN pledged to a policy of non- interference in the internal affairs of other members; second: they agreed to the process of making decisions by consensus; and third: they were fully committed to the centrality of ASEAN. Together, these make up the elements that created the "ASEAN Way". That the nations of ASEAN enjoyed five decades of uninterrupted peace is by no means accidental. Since 1967 till now, we have relatively uninterrupted peace because of what we have done in ASEAN. This afforded member countries time to focus attention and devote resources to nation building and economic development. Period of Cooperation and Growth For all the talk on subscribing to a unified set of rules and putting aside our differences, you may be wondering how exactly this stability contributed to the growth of the region. Besides the facilitation of intra-region trade and commerce, regional stability and security made the region attractive to foreign investments and capital. For about 25 years from 1970 to 1995, ASEAN's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.0 percent per annum, and Southeast Asia today has a total market of about 640 million people and a combined GDP of close to US$3 trillion. ASEAN is now the fifth largest trading entity in the world after the European Union, China, the United States and Japan. Singapore's Growth Singapore has equally prospered as a result of this regional peace and stability. Fifty-four years ago, when Singapore first gained her independence, our GDP per capita was around 500 US dollars in 1965. Fast forward five decades later, this figure has grown more than a hundred times to 55,000 US dollars today. Singapore's secret to achieving first-world economic status from third-world in a single generation is very much tied to the reason for ASEAN's prosperous growth: Openness to international trade and cooperation, within a stable regional political climate and security architecture. Our trade volume is more than three times our GDP, the second highest in the world. To date, we have signed 24 Free Trade Agreements with the world's major economies, including the ASEAN-China FTA. We have also ratified the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership or CPTPP as of last year, eliminating more than 90% of tariffs for our exports to all CPTPP markets. With clear economic benefits afforded to the ASEAN markets, we can very visibly see an added incentive to preserving the security and by extension, the stability of the region. Other ASEAN Member States have also prospered as a result of the peace and stability in the region. Would we want to give this up? We are able to achieve this because our pioneering leaders had the foresight to set aside differences and deepen mutual trust. Imagine if they had not done so. They realise that tensions and mistrust will hamper growth as investors will stay away from unstable regions. New Threats on the Horizon Following the relative stability and economic prosperity during the first five decades following WWII, the September 11 attack shook the world, and revealed how quickly global threats have evolved, and how security that is vital to our region can be threatened by these new threats. While threats had previously been conventional and visible, it could now come in various shapes and forms, in this case specifically Islamic Radicalisation in Southeast Asia. To state an example, radicalised threats in the region first bore the face of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), a homegrown Southeast Asian terrorist organisation affiliated to Al-Qaeda, and now counts amongst its numbers the Islamic State (IS), who have claimed responsibility for attacks all over the globe. The IS has demonstrated a resolve to root themselves in the region and conduct recruitment and attacks regionally, while the war on terrorism in other countries is far from over. We see the long reach of transnational terrorism from the attacks in Boston in 2013, Paris in 2015, Indonesia in 2018, and Sri Lanka in 2019.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Herman R. Hochstadt's Memoir
    NThe ew Eurasian OCT – DEC 2020 www.eurasians.org.sg Real-Life Stories: EA's Beneficiaries Fun With Docents At The Eurasian Heritage Gallery SERVING SINGAPORE WITH PRIDE A Review Of Herman R. Hochstadt's Memoir Contact us CONTENTS 1 IN TOUCH 2 HIGHLIGHTS Welcoming The EA’s New Management Committee; Stronger Together: Walk For Fitness 5 SPOTLIGHT Serving Singapore: A Memoir By Herman R. Hochstadt 9 SUPPORTING EURASIANS Standing In The Shoes Of Others 11 LEARNING JOURNEYS 17th Joint Tuition Awards Ceremony; Eurasian Community Fund Awards; Overcoming The Odds 5 14 CULTURE & HERITAGE Step Back In Time 16 OUR PEOPLE Building Political Awareness In Singapore 18 EURASIAN YOUTH 11 Our Wild Neighbours; Tend To Your Mental Health Garden 14 21 CHRISTMAS SPECIAL An Egg-cellent Delight; Sweet Indulgence; A Taste Of Christmas; Festive Sparkle NThe ew Eurasian Magazine of the Eurasian Association, Singapore The New Eurasian is published quarterly and read by more than 17,000 Eurasians in Singapore. It is circulated to senior government offices, various ministries, statutory boards, community organisations and self-help groups. Advertising Rates Series Discounts Prime positions (full colour) Twice a year: 5% discount Bleed size: 216mm x 303mm; Type area: 192mm x 279mm Four times a year: 10% discount • Inside Front Cover: $1,200 • Inside Back Cover: $1,200 To place your ad, call the EA at 6447 1578 • Outside Back Cover: $1,500 or email [email protected] • Loose Inserts: $1,500 Inside (Colour) • Full Page: $1,000 Copy must be submitted two weeks before publication date. • Half Page: $600 Publication dates: 15 Jan, 15 Apr, 15 Jul, 15 Oct* • Quarter Page: $300 * Dates may change No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue:2014 No.3
    ISSUE:2014 NO.3 Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119614 [email protected] | www.iseas.edu.sg ISEAS MONITOR is a socio-political survey of Southeast Asia which examines current events to identify trends in specific countries and in the wider region. The Region: Geopolitical Overview The geopolitics of Eastern Europe has captured the world’s attention far more than that of Asia—let alone Southeast Asia—in recent weeks. But events in Kiev, the cities of the eastern Ukraine and the Crimea and the sputtering efforts of outside actors to influence them have clear relevance to the region. They underline the importance of Southeast Asia’s longstanding determination to build a system of cooperation that allows the region’s states to remain the masters of their own fates. This project takes into account outside powers’ legitimate interests in Southeast Asia, and the months ahead will bring pressure on Southeast Asian states to manage those interests. With both Russo-Ukrainian and Sino- Japanese tensions in mind, the region’s largest country, Indonesia, can be expected to articulate a more coherent and focused policy toward Chinese claims in the South China Sea. The late April visits of Barack Obama to Malaysia and the Philippines should give new energy to the slow-motion US pivot to the region. And Japan’s search for “de facto alliances” in Southeast Asia will continue. Observers of the region will thus need to weigh the ascendancy of regional institutions over the patch- work of bilateral agreements that have been the effective basis for the regional architecture in Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • KONFRONTASI: Why Singapore Was in Forefront of Indonesian Attacks
    www.rsis.edu.sg No. 062 – 23 March 2015 RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical issues and contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced electronically or in print with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email: [email protected] for feedback to the Editor RSIS Commentaries, Mr Yang Razali Kassim. KONFRONTASI: Why Singapore was in Forefront of Indonesian Attacks By Mushahid Ali Synopsis Indonesia’s confrontation of Malaysia in the 1960s saw a campaign of bomb attacks against civilian targets in Singapore including MacDonald House. Several Indonesians were captured, tried and hanged. What was the objective of Konfrontasi? Commentary ON 10 MARCH 2015 a memorial to Konfrontasi (Confrontation) was inaugurated on Orchard Road, opposite MacDonald House, which was bombed by Indonesian marines 50 years earlier, on 10 March 1965. The assault, in which three civilians were killed and 33 others injured, was the most serious bomb attack, but not the only successful one, in Singapore, as reported by Daniel Wei Boon Chua in his RSIS commentary of 16 March 2015 (KONFRONTASI: Why It Still Matters to Singapore). There were several bombs that were set off and people killed and injured during the three year-long campaign by Indonesian saboteurs, aimed at demoralising the people and damaging Singapore’s economy. The low-intensity conflict was launched by Indonesia’s president Sukarno to “crush Malaysia”, of which Singapore was a part from 1963 to 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • 268KB***The Law on Treasonable Offences in Singapore
    Published on e-First 14 April 2021 THE LAW ON TREASONABLE OFFENCES IN SINGAPORE This article aims to provide an extensive and detailed analysis of the law on treasonable offences in Singapore. It traces the historical development of the treason law in Singapore from the colonial period under British rule up until the present day, before proceeding to lay down the applicable legal principles that ought to govern these treasonable offences, drawing on authorities in the UK, India as well as other Commonwealth jurisdictions. With a more long-term view towards the reform and consolidation of the treason law in mind, this article also proposes several tentative suggestions for reform, complete with a draft bill devised by the author setting out these proposed changes. Benjamin LOW1 LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore). “Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”2 I. Introduction 1 The law on treasonable offences, more commonly referred to as treason,3 in Singapore remains shrouded in a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity despite having existed as part of the legal fabric of Singapore since its early days as a British colony. A student who picks up any major textbook on Singapore criminal law will find copious references to various other kinds of substantive offences, general principles of criminal liability as well as discussion of law reform even, but very little mention is made of the relevant law on treason.4 Academic commentary on this 1 The author is grateful to Julia Emma D’Cruz, the staff of the C J Koh Law Library, the Lee Kong Chian Reference Library and the ISEAS Library for their able assistance in the author’s research for this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Political Security of Singapore
    Political Security study guide SMC 2018: Singapore’s role as a small state POLITICAL SECURITY COUNCIL Learning Outcomes Students should understand Singapore’s limitations as a small state and be aware of how it safeguards its position on the international stage by capitalising on its strengths. [Topic 1: Singapore’s role in ASEAN] Introduction Political security of Singapore The island state of Singapore is dwarfed by geographically larger countries on the international stage, yet our nation’s numerous diplomatic ties with other countries grant us considerable influence. This has helped cement our place in the global community. Increasingly, though, Singapore’s political security is not as certain as before, given the unpredictability of relations between China and the USA, and Singapore’s close ties with both countries. At the same time, Singapore has added responsibilities as the current ASEAN Chair, with aims to strengthen and sustain ASEAN’s relations internationally. There is also a need to balance our role as a leader in the region with protecting national interests. Hence, maintaining our political security and deciding how this should be undertaken are issues that continue to be of great concern. Singapore’s foreign policy As outlined by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr. Vivian Balakrishnan, there are two main guiding principles governing Singapore’s foreign policy:1 firstly, protecting our nation’s 1 Cheong, Danson. “Vivian Balakrishnan outlines core principles guiding Singapore's foreign policy.” The Straits Times, 17 July 2017, www.straitstimes.com/singapore/vivian-outlines-core- principles-guiding-spores-foreign-policy. 1 Political Security study guide SMC 2018: Singapore’s role as a small state sovereignty and independence, and, secondly, transcending geographical borders to maximise Singapore’s opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Konfrontasi Memorial Ceremony on 10 March 2016, 1825Hrs
    SPEECH BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SAF VETERANS’ LEAGUE, BRIGADIER-GENERAL (NS) WINSTON TOH, AT THE KONFRONTASI MEMORIAL CEREMONY ON 10 MARCH 2016, 1825HRS Dr Mohamad Maliki, Senior Minister of State for Defence, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, 1. Thank you for accepting our invitation to this memorial ceremony, to remember the innocent lives lost, and honour those who fought valiantly for the survival of our nation during Konfrontasi. 2. In 1963, President Sukarno of Indonesia launched an armed campaign of Konfrontasi to destroy the Federation of Malaysia of which Singapore was then a part of. For the next three years, Singapore plunged into a period of fear and uncertainty, as saboteurs carried out a series of terror attacks on civilians. Our pioneers not only had to worry about their next meal, but whether they and their loved ones would make it home safely at the end of the day. 3. Despite the risks, Singaporeans stood together to defend all that we held dear. Some of our veterans from the First and Second Singapore Infantry Regiment (SIR) are present here today. LTC (Ret) Daljeet Singh, LTC (Ret) Syed Ibrahim and MAJ (Ret) Abdul Samad were young soldiers when they were deployed to the frontlines in Johor and Sabah to conduct operations against Indonesian incursions. There were casualties, but our forces persevered and emerged stronger and more determined from the fight. Our defenders also included ordinary Singaporeans who served with the Singapore Volunteer Corps, the Singapore Naval 1 Volunteer Force, and the Vigilante Corps, safeguarding Singapore with the Police during Konfrontasi.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background Singapore Is Well
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background Singapore is well-known by its small but busy city, which is positioned at 9 over 10 countries in the world. There are over 5 million people live in Singapore and over 8 million visitors who come to Singapore to enjoy this urban country (Rawat, 2014). Besides keeping the interaction with the visitors by its excursions and dazzled cultures, Singapore also keeps innovating the development of their human resources while increasing the infrastructure sector at the same time, in which by this way makes Singapore keeps moving forward. The rapid growth of infrastructure facilities encourages investors to put investment in Singapore. Singapore is famous by its hospitality for businessman to invest their company in Singapore of which country has no additional tax for the assets. Foreign ownership is recognized by the government. There is no inheritance tax and foreign citizens are able to get a bank loan of up to 70 percent, bank lending rates under two percent, and transparant regulation of property sales (Diela, 2014). These conditions becomes the reason why Google, Microsoft, and Kellogg’s build their offices in Singapore which underlies Singapore to be dubbed as one of the busiest ports and airlines. Behind its purpose to give a huge profits to the investors and a pleasure excursions to the visitors to increase the economic sector, Singapore’s commitment overall is to make the country a safe place for all where people could live, work and play safely in the country (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2002). Both 1 for its citizen and foreign citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • Students' Judgments of Historical Significance in Singapore Schools
    Students’ Judgments of Historical Significance in Singapore Schools: Positionalities and Narratives Angeline Jude Enk Sung Yeo A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Dr. Walter C. Parker, Chair Dr. Manka M.Varghese Dr. Ana M. Elfers Program Authorized to Offer Degree: College of Education © Copyright 2015 Angeline Jude Enk Sung Yeo University of Washington Abstract Students’ Judgments of Historical Significance in Singapore Schools: Positionalities and Narratives Angeline Jude Enk Sung Yeo Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Walter C. Parker College of Education Research has established that students’ ethnic, community, and national identities can influence their judgments on historical significance. Furthermore, it has demonstrated that students’ identities may incline them towards appropriating or resisting particular historical narratives when considering historical significance. In Singapore, little is known about how students think about and make judgments of historical significance as well as which aspects of their identity they draw upon to make these judgments. Using a qualitative case study approach that relies mainly on individual and focus group interviews, this study investigates how 15 secondary school students define their identities in Singapore and examines how these identities influence their judgments of the historical significance of persons and events in Singapore’s past. The key findings indicate that students in Singapore tend to position and locate themselves as multiracial i Singaporeans and draw upon a narrative template that complies with the official Singapore narrative to make judgments of significance. The study also reveals that the use of this narrative template has resulted in the development of reductionist views of the past among students.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges Faced by Singapore Economy in the Future
    I M Sreehari, Tharman Akanksha, International Journal of Advance Research and Development. (Volume 3, Issue 1) Available online at www.ijarnd.com Challenges Faced by Singapore Economy in the Future Sreehari I M1, Akanksha Tharman2 12Christ University, Bengaluru, Karnataka ABSTRACT The article aims to figure out the challenges Singapore possibly faces in the future to be the super economy in the future. Singapore was one of the poorest countries at the time of their independence, after a forced independence and a country with fewer resources Singapore have managed to become one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Singapore achieved all its fortunes through a long-term vision and strict government control. But the situation and circumstances are not the same in the future as Singapore has already reached its peak of its development. Now Singapore has to concentrate on maintaining their position. Like every other countries Singapore also has to face a lot of challenges to maintain its economy. The technological advancement, changes in labour allocation, the shift in job patterns, and change in the education system are few of the challenges which Singapore possibly face. The world is full of opportunities and the ones who grab it becomes the winner. Now Singapore has all the facilities and tools to seize each and every opportunities available. Singapore is now a prosperous country which is the ninth largest country in terms of GDP Percapita. Singapore focuses on manufacturing sector, shipping and business. Now Singapore economy should target to climb up the ladder and maintain their position as a super economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Why There Is No NATO in Southeast Asia
    Let’s forget about NATO in Southeast Asia: A practical analysis of the ASEAN Way of security cooperation Chau Bao Nguyen1 PhD Candidate, Associate Tutor University of East Anglia, UK Abstract Moving from material-based to ideational and practice-based perspectives, this paper suggests a new angle in the research on regional integration and security multilateralism in East Asia. It addresses tensions within the constructivist approach that tend to leave the theory of practice, culture and micro process of socialization under-explained. I argue that, 25 years after the Cold War, Southeast Asia is still lacking common interests, trust, and more importantly a shared identity: the basic foundations for a collective security framework. This fact renders the establishment of a NATO-type security structure extremely unlikely. Alternatively, this constructivist view emphasizes the establishment of a uniquely security culture; one which informal discourse of problem-solving and consensus seeking. The paper’s theoretical focus will be supplemented the case study of the components of the ASEAN Way and how they are practised in everyday politics. This research makes three wider contributions. First, it enriches the existing understanding of security cooperation and regional dynamics. Second, the paper contributes to the "practice turn" in constructivist International Relations (IR) to incorporate the international practice of everyday politics into analytical focus. Finally, it ties into the emerging debate about the role of culture in IR and whether scholars have misinterpreted East Asia through over-reliance on the Occidental lens and its implicit Eurocentrism. Key words: ASEAN Way, Southeast Asia, Constructivism, practice, security culture. 1 Chau B.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Change in Singapore-Indonesia Bilateral Relationships Abstra
    HWA CHONG INSTITUTION Humanities Programme 2019 Written Report – Cat 2a Name: Jerome Ang Shun Kang ( 13 ) Class: Sec 3H1 Subject slant: History Title: Change and Continuity: Foreign Policy Change in Singapore-Indonesia Bilateral Relationships Abstract The aim of this research paper is to investigate the Foreign Policy c hanges between Singapore and Indonesia mainly through the comparative study of 3 major events; the Konfrontasi launched against Singapore and Malaysia (1963), the execution of the 2 Marines responsible for the MacDonald House bombing (1968) and the naming of Indonesian Navy Ship Usman Harun, after the 2 Marines (2014). It aims to identify foreign policy changes and discover whether the change in national leadership is the most prominent factor for the Change and Continuity in Foreign Policies and bilateral relationships between the two countries. Chapter 1: Introductory Chapter 1.1 Background The importance of maintaining positive bilateral relationships with other countries, especially South-East Asian countries has been a major focus for Singapore’s development and progress onto the international stage. Singapore strives to be ‘a friend to all and enemy to none’ and this principle is the core of Singapore’s bilateral relationships, especially with geographically larger countries surrounding Singapore. However, with the advancement of Singapore as a prominent player in ASEAN and in the world, a new diplomatic approach has to be adopted, © Hwa Chong Institution (High School) one that maintains positive bilateral relations in our region and internationally without compromising sovereignty and natural interest. The approach of realpolitik, a realistic approach of situational diplomacy is employed to provide Singapore with a form of economic and political breathing space.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Geylang Serai Museology Highlight
    THE STORIES BEHIND JUBILEE WALK NO. COMMUNITY 32 HERITAGE TRAIL: VOL. OUR GEYLANG 09 SERAI ISS. 01 MUSEOLOGY HIGHLIGHT: WHEN OBJECTS BECOME THE SUBJECT Front Cover National Day, August 9, 1966 Photo courtesy of National Archives of Singapore Front Inner Cover Mummy-board, probably from Thebes, Egypt, 950 – 990 BC © 2015 the Trustees of the British Museum FOREWORD FOREWORD Publisher National Heritage Board 61 Stamford Road, MUSE SG is beginning the of the Singaporean identity. The #03-08, Stamford Court, New Year with a new look and a new generation highlights our Singapore 178892 look back on Singapore’s Jubilee multi-faceted cultural identity, Chief Executive Officer Celebrations. continuing the thread of our Rosa Daniel past as a heterogeneous mix of A key milestone in the Jubilee Assistant Chief Executive immigrants who called Singapore Alvin Tan Year, the Jubilee Walk was home. They remind us that we are (Policy & Community) launched to commemorate the only as strong as we are resolute in 50th anniversary of Singapore’s creating a better future together, MUSE SG team independence. The Jubilee Walk while keeping the roots of our Editor-in-chief covers 23 architectural gems, beginnings close. David Chew bringing visitors up close and Design Consultant personal with Singapore’s past, Finally, to round up the year Ian Lin present and future. and usher in new beginnings, we Editorial Managers remember that history also lies in Reena Devi MUSE profiles 12 individuals Ruchi Mittal our diverse communities all over Raudha Muntadar for The Stories behind the Jubilee the island and, for this issue, we Production Manager Walk (page 27) in this bumper focus on Geylang Serai.
    [Show full text]