DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY of MELBOURNE URBAN FOREST STRATEGY 10 July 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITY of MELBOURNE URBAN FOREST STRATEGY 10 July 2012 Page 1 of 253 FUTURE MELBOURNE (ECO-CITY) Agenda Item 5.1 COMMITTEE REPORT CITY OF MELBOURNE URBAN FOREST STRATEGY 10 July 2012 Presenter: Ian Shears, Manager Urban Landscapes Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to provide the Future Melbourne Committee with an assessment of the public consultation on the draft Urban Forest Strategy undertaken between November 2011- April 2012 and to seek endorsement of the revised draft Urban Forest Strategy (Strategy) (refer Attachment 2) and the Urban Forest Diversity Guidelines (Guidelines) which support the Strategy (refer Attachment 3). 2. At its 8 November 2011 meeting the Future Melbourne Committee endorsed the draft Urban Forest Strategy for public consultation. Key issues 3. The Strategy and the Guidelines have now been revised to reflect the comments and feedback received during the consultation period. A detailed report on consultation feedback is attached (refer Attachment 4). 4. An extensive engagement process was undertaken on the draft Strategy and Guidelines from 9 November 2011 until 31 March 2012 to seek feedback from the community, agencies and stakeholders. 5. Feedback revealed that the community predominantly support the Strategy and Guidelines. However, it must be noted that many comments received during the consultation pertained to expressions of preference on the topic of species origin which was not pertinent to consultation on the Strategy. 6. The Strategy and Guidelines received widespread academic and industry support both locally, nationally and internationally. 7. Several experts were commissioned to assist with the further development of the Strategy document based on the outcomes of the consultation including Dr Dave Kendal and Cynnamon Dobbs, PhD candidate, both from Australian Research Centre of Urban Ecology (ARCUE) at University of Melbourne, Dr Peter May, May Horticulture and Anna Egan, PhD candidate, University of Tasmania. 8. Fuller detail on the proposed Tree Precinct Plans, which form a critical element of the implementation of this strategy, has been included in the Strategy. Recommendation from management 9. That the Future Melbourne Committee: 9.1. note the Consultation Report and the outcomes of community engagement activities; allow a further public comment or submissions on the revised City of Melbourne Urban Forest Strategy and Urban Forest Diversity Guidelines until 30 July 2012 and request a further report to the 14 August 2012 Committee meeting; and 9.2. notify all submitters to date of the Committee’s consideration of the revised City of Melbourne Urban Forest Strategy and Urban Forest Diversity Guidelines. Attachments: 1. Supporting Attachment 2. Draft Urban Forest Strategy 3. Diversity Guidelines 4. Community Consultation Report for the Draft Urban Forest Strategy Page 2 of 253 Attachment 1 Agenda Item 5.1 Future Melbourne Committee 10 July 2012 SUPPORTING ATTACHMENT Legal 1. No direct legal issues arise from the recommendation from management. Finance 2. There is an operational budget allocated to the Urban Forest Strategy which covers costs incurred through the running of community engagement events and the consultation online forum. Conflict of interest 3. No member of Council staff, or other person engaged under a contract, involved in advising on or preparing this report has declared a direct or indirect interest in relation to the matter of the report. Stakeholder consultation 4. The City of Melbourne Parks and Gardens Advisory Committee have provided valuable input into the identification of issues to be addressed by the Strategy and have provided feedback and direction at various stages in its development. 5. An extensive engagement process was undertaken from 9 November 2011 until 31 March 2012 to involve the community and all interested stakeholders in the further development of this Strategy. 6. A range of methods were employed during the engagement process to ensure that consultation and communications were as wide-reaching as possible. This included a series of community meetings, an Urban Forest Forum, ten precinct based community meetings were held where a combined 110 community members and representatives from residents groups attended. 7. Direct briefings and presentations on the Strategy were provided to Friends of the Elms, University of Melbourne, the Victorian Centre for Climate Change Research, State Government, Landcare, the National Urban Forest Alliance, VicHealth, and Australian Institute of Landscape Architects. 8. A permanent online forum was developed to provide information and a fulltime ‘online forum’ for the duration of the consultation. This online forum received 4,249 individual visitors who made a combined total of 11,991 site visits with 20,316 page views. The Strategy was downloaded 818 times from the site and over 19,000 words in submissions and commentary was generated by 177 commentators. 9. Information was also available online at the City of Melbourne corporate website which received 7,000 hits, with 5,000 unique views. 10. A short video was developed to highlight the key issues and provide a brief overview of the Strategy. This video was viewed over 2,500 times. 11. An Urban Forest Forum was held in the Town Hall on 30 November 2011 and 135 members of the community attended this event. 12. Several experts were commissioned to assist with the further development of the document based on the outcomes of the consultation. They include: 1 Page 3 of 253 12.1. Dr Dave Kendal, ARCUE, University of Melbourne and Dr Peter May have further developed and refined the diversity goals; 12.2. Cynnamon Dobbs, PhD candidate, ARCUE, University of Melbourne, has undertaken further assessment and modelling of the composition of the urban forest; and 12.3. Anna Egan, PhD candidate, University of Tasmania has more comprehensively articulated the history of Melbourne’s urban forest. 13. A detailed Consultation Report is attached (refer attachment 4). Relation to Council policy 14. The Urban Forest Strategy relates to and is consistent with the following policies and strategies: 14.1. Future Melbourne – Eco City; 14.2. Open Space Strategy (2012); 14.3. Arden MacAulay Structure Plan & North Melbourne Structure Plan (2012); 14.4. Southbank Structure Plan (2010); 14.5. Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (2009); and 14.6. Total Watermark; City as a Catchment (2008). Environmental sustainability 15. Environmental sustainability issues have been a priority in the development of this document. The implementation of the recommended actions and targets within the strategy will bring about multiple environmental benefits, including increasing the longevity of tree life, increasing canopy coverage and vegetation throughout the municipality, lowering air pollution, increasing carbon storage and sequestration, capture and reuse of stormwater, removing pollutants from water, reducing energy expenditure during summer months and periods of extreme heat, mitigating the urban heat island and adapting the municipality to climate change. 2 Page 4 of 253 Urban Forest Strategy Making a great city greener 2012-2032 melbourne.vic.gov.au/urbanforest Page 5 of 253 Page 6 of 253 REVISED DRAFT – JULY 2012 Page 7 of 253 A message from the City of Melbourne The City of Melbourne is renowned for its heritage-listed iconic parks, gardens, reserves and boulevards. They have formed an essential part of Melbourne’s identity for more than a century. However, the circumstances for our urban forest are changing. Many of our trees are now reaching the end of their natural life span and the past decade of drought has accelerated decline for these and many of our other trees. We expect to lose 39 per cent of the trees within our landscape within the next two decades. This strategy embraces the opportunity to generate a new legacy for Melbourne and create the forest of the future for new generations. This document sets out how our urban forest will become diverse, robust and resilient in the face of current and future challenges. We know that climate change and increasing density and growth within our city will place new pressures on our urban forest, but the targets we have set in this document will meet those challenges. An increasing body of evidence and research informs us that urban forests and green space are vital to supporting a healthy community as well as providing a means to adapting to climate change. This strategy sets a bold target of doubling our canopy cover by 2040 so that we can provide a greener and cooler city for those who live, work and play in our municipality. Most importantly, it articulates how we can enhance our urban forest to reflect and respond to the needs of the community and the city. We have worked with our community and key stakeholders for two years to generate this strategy. We are confident that it will strategically plan for our future urban forest while maintaining and enhancing Melbourne’s existing and much loved character. Robert Doyle Cr Cathy Oke Lord Mayor Future Melbourne (Eco-city) Committee Chair 2 Making a great city greener 2012-2040 Page 8 of 253 REVISED DRAFT – JULY 2012 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Executive Summary 7 3 Background & Context 9 3.1 What is an Urban Forest? 9 3.2 Benefits of the Urban orestF 10 3.2.1 Environmental benefits 11 3.2.2 Community benefits 12 3.2.3 Economic benefits 13 3.3 Evolution of Melbourne’s Urban Forest 14 3.3.1 Historical development 14 3.3.2 The urban forest today 19 3.3.3 Policy context 25 4 Issues & Challenges 27 4.1 Ageing tree population 28 4.2 Water 30 4.3 Climate change 32 4.4 The urban heat island effect 34 4.5 Population increase and urban intensification 36 4.6 Towards our Future Forest 38 5 Principles & Strategies 40 5.1 Our priorities 40 5.2 Principles 40 5.3 Strategies 41 5.3.1 Increase canopy cover 42 5.3.2 Increase urban forest diversity 44 5.3.3 Improve vegetation health 46 5.3.4 Improve soil moisture and water quality 48 5.3.5 Improve urban ecology 50 5.3.6 Engage with the community 52 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art Gallery of Ballarat Annual Report 10-11 Annual Report
    Art Gallery of Ballarat Annual Report 10-11 Annual Report 2010-11 ISSN 0726-5530 Chair’s Report .................................................................................................4 Art Gallery of Ballarat ACN: 145 246 224 Director’s Report .........................................................................................6 ABN: 28 145 246 224 Association Report .....................................................................................8 40 Lydiard Street North Ballarat Victoria 3350 Women’s Association Report ............................................................10 T 03 5320 5858 F 03 5320 5791 Gallery Guides Report ...........................................................................11 [email protected] Acquisitions ...................................................................................................13 www.artgalleryofballarat.com.au Outward Loan ..............................................................................................27 Exhibitions ......................................................................................................31 Public Programs ........................................................................................35 Education Visits and Programs ..........................................................37 Adopt an Artwork ......................................................................................40 Donations, Gifts and Bequests .........................................................41 Gallery Staff and Volunteers
    [Show full text]
  • Pests, Diseases, and Aridity Have Shaped the Genome of Corymbia Citriodora
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Pests, diseases, and aridity have shaped the genome of Corymbia citriodora. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t51515k Journal Communications biology, 4(1) ISSN 2399-3642 Authors Healey, Adam L Shepherd, Mervyn King, Graham J et al. Publication Date 2021-05-10 DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02009-0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02009-0 OPEN Pests, diseases, and aridity have shaped the genome of Corymbia citriodora ✉ Adam L. Healey 1,2 , Mervyn Shepherd 3, Graham J. King 3, Jakob B. Butler 4, Jules S. Freeman 4,5,6, David J. Lee 7, Brad M. Potts4,5, Orzenil B. Silva-Junior8, Abdul Baten 3,9, Jerry Jenkins 1, Shengqiang Shu 10, John T. Lovell 1, Avinash Sreedasyam1, Jane Grimwood 1, Agnelo Furtado2, Dario Grattapaglia8,11, Kerrie W. Barry10, Hope Hundley10, Blake A. Simmons 2,12, Jeremy Schmutz 1,10, René E. Vaillancourt4,5 & Robert J. Henry 2 Corymbia citriodora is a member of the predominantly Southern Hemisphere Myrtaceae family, which includes the eucalypts (Eucalyptus, Corymbia and Angophora; ~800 species). 1234567890():,; Corymbia is grown for timber, pulp and paper, and essential oils in Australia, South Africa, Asia, and Brazil, maintaining a high-growth rate under marginal conditions due to drought, poor-quality soil, and biotic stresses. To dissect the genetic basis of these desirable traits, we sequenced and assembled the 408 Mb genome of Corymbia citriodora, anchored into eleven chromosomes. Comparative analysis with Eucalyptus grandis reveals high synteny, although the two diverged approximately 60 million years ago and have different genome sizes (408 vs 641 Mb), with few large intra-chromosomal rearrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucalypt Discovery Walk
    Eucalypt Discovery Walk This self-guided walk through the Botanic Gardens features 21 eucalypts, each of which has an interpretive sign. Additional information is provided here. A round trip, starting with #1 Eucalyptus cunninghamii in the North Car Park and returning past #21 Eucalyptus viminalis to the Visitor Information Centre, will take about an hour and covers a range of terrain (e.g. stairs, lawn, uneven surfaces). There are about 850 eucalypt species, almost all occurring naturally only in Australia. Indeed, eucalypts are a defining feature of the Australian landscape. They are an important component of Australian vegetation and provide a habitat for many native animals. Some species have a wide geographic distribution, others are extremely restricted in their natural habitat and may need conservation. There is great diversity of size, form, leaf and bark type among eucalypts. Eucalypts have many commercial uses. An important source of wood products in Australia, they are also the world’s most widely-planted hardwoods. Large areas are being grown in Brazil, South Africa, India, China and elsewhere mainly for pulp and paper production. Species featured in this walk have been selected to illustrate the diversity and many uses of eucalypts. Acknowledgements This walk has been supported by the Bjarne K. Dahl Trust (www.dahltrust.org.au) a philanthropic fund. Dahl was a Norwegian forester who developed a great affinity with the Australian Bush and left his entire estate to establish a fund which focuses solely on eucalypts. Funds have also been provided by the Public Fund of the Friends of the Australian National Botanic Gardens (www.friendsanbg.org.au).
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Nutrition of Corymbia Citriodora Seedlings Using Doses of Liquid Swine Waste
    DOI: 10.14295/CS.v8i2.1851 Comunicata Scientiae 8(2): 256-264, 2017 Article e-ISSN: 2177-5133 www.comunicatascientiae.com Growth and nutrition of Corymbia citriodora seedlings using doses of liquid swine waste João Antônio da Silva Coelho¹, Cristiane Ramos Vieira², Oscarlina Lúcia dos Santos Weber1 1 Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil. 2. Universidade de Cuiabá, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil. *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The experiment was installed in a greenhouse with the aimed to verify the influence of liquid swine waste in the development and nutrition of Corymbia citriodora seedlings. The swine waste was mixed with a commercial substrate in order to analyze the effects of five doses, in a randomized block design, considering the N requirement of the species, which were T1 – 0%; T2 – 50%; T3 – 100%; T4 – 150% and; T5 – 200% and one treatment with mineral fertilization for comparison. The Corymbia citriodora seeds were germinated in plastic tubes with a commercial substrate plus swine waste. As the seedlings reached about five centimeters the thinning was performed, and when the plants reached 15 cm in length the growth analysis was started. At the end of the experiment the seedlings were measured, weighed and milled for macro and micronutrients determination. The best doses of liquid swine waste were 150% and 200% which showed the highest growth average values of the Corymbia citriodora seedlings, to the detriment of the nutritional and physical improvement of the substrate. Keywords: Corymbia, organic waste, forestry nutrition Introduction and heavy metals; or water quality because the Swine breeding in Brazil has increased in swine waste can contaminate groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Toxicity of Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus, Corymbia Citriodora (Hook.), Against Larvae of the Asian Tiger Mosquito and Non-Target Fish and Larval Amphibians
    Anales de Biología 36: 97-105, 2014 ARTICLE DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesbio.36.17 Evaluating the toxicity of oil of lemon eucalyptus, Corymbia citriodora (Hook.), against larvae of the Asian tiger mosquito and non-target fish and larval amphibians Santi Escartin1 & Simone Mariani1,2 1 Associació Mediambiental Xatrac. C/ Font d’en Bandina 3, Urb.Font de Sant Llorenç. Bústia 39. 17.310 Lloret de Mar. Spain. 2 Departament d’Ecologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Existe una corrección de este trabajo (vol.37)/ There is a corrigendum note of this article (vol.37). Resumen Correspondence Evaluación de la toxicidad del aceite del eucalipto limón, Corymbia S. Mariani citriodora (Hook.), contra las larvas de mosquito tigre y peces y an- E-mail: [email protected] fibios no objetivo Received: 30 June 2014 Hemos probado la toxicidad del aceite del eucalipto limón (OLE) Accepted: 27 October 2014 contra las larvas de mosquito tigre Aedes (Stegomya) albopictus Published on-line: 30 October 2014 (Skuse, 1895) (Diptera: Culicidae) y contra vertebrados acuáticos no objetivo, el pez Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard, 1853) y el renacuajo de la rana Pelophylax perezi (López-Seodane, 1885). La mezcla acuosa de OLE fue efectiva como larvicida y letal para gambúsias y renacuajos. La mezcla acuosa expuesta durante una semana al aire libre no tuvo efectos sobre las larvas. El OLE puro aplicado sobre la superficie del agua matólas larvas a muy bajas concentraciones y sin tener en cuenta el volumen del agua. El OLE ha mostrado ser un compuesto útil contra las larvas de mosquito ti- gre especialmente en los lugares de cría aislados de los ecosiste- mas nativos.
    [Show full text]
  • Arboricultural Assessment Former Calder Rise Primary School
    Arboricultural Assessment Former Calder Rise Primary School Prepared for Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Prepared by David Phillips 17/01/2014 Tree Logic Pty Ltd Unit 4, 21 Eugene Terrace Ringwood Vic 3134 Ph 03 9870 7700 treelogic.com.au Arboricultural Assessment Report – former Calder Rise Primary School. Contents. Client Brief .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Method: ................................................................................................................................................ 4 3 Observations ....................................................................................................................................... 5 4 Permit requirement: ............................................................................................................................. 7 5 Design proposal: .................................................................................................................................. 7 6. Photographic examples ....................................................................................................................... 9 7. Conclusion and Recommendations: .................................................................................................. 10 References:
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • SF Street Tree Species List 2019
    Department of Public Works 2019 Recommended Street Tree Species List 1 Introduction The San Francisco Urban Forestry Council periodically reviews and updates this list of trees in collaboration with public and non-profit urban forestry stakeholders, including San Francisco Public Works, Bureau of Urban Forestry and Friends of the Urban Forest. The 2019 Street Tree List was approved by the Urban Forestry Council on October 22, 2019. This list is intended to be used for the public realm of streets and associated spaces and plazas that are generally under the jurisdiction of the Public Works. While the focus is on the streetscape, e.g., tree wells in the public sidewalks, the list makes accommodations for these other areas in the public realm, e.g., “Street Parks.” While this list recommends species that are known to do well in many locations in San Francisco, no tree is perfect for every potential tree planting location. This list should be used as a guideline for choosing which street tree to plant but should not be used without the help of an arborist or other tree professional. All street trees must be approved by Public Works before planting. Sections 1 and 2 of the list are focused on trees appropriate for sidewalk tree wells, and Section 3 is intended as a list of trees that have limited use cases and/or are being considered as street trees. Finally, new this year, Section 4, is intended to be a list of local native tree and arborescent shrub species that would be appropriate for those sites in the public realm that have more space than the sidewalk planting wells, for example, stairways, “Street Parks,” plazas, and sidewalk gardens, where more concrete has been extracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucalyptus Leucoxylon Edited.Pub
    Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow Gum TAXONOMY Division Angiosperm (flowering plant) Subclass Dicotyledonae (dicotyledon) Family MYRTACEAE Taxonomic Identification Number 9146 (ANH et al 2006) Previous Taxonomic Names The current taxonomic name E. leucoxylon has bee in use since 1855 (ANH et al 2006). Six subspecies are currently recognised in Victoria (RBGM n.d.), two have only been recently described and recognised and are not included in Flora of Victoria (1996). The newly described subspecies are: E. leucoxylon ssp. connata (Rule 1991) and E. leucoxylon ssp. bellarinensis (Rule 1998). Taxonomic Status Victorian eucalypts are currently under review by taxonomist Kevin Rule (K. Rule 2005 pers. comm.). Common Names: Yellow Gum (preferred name), White Ironbark, South Australian Blue Gum (ANGB n.d.) MORPHOLOGY Mallee or tree to 25 m tall. Bark at base usually coarse, loose, fibrous with most of trunk or stems smooth and yellowish. Juvenile leaves sessile, opposite for many pairs sometimes with opposite leaf bases connate, ovate to broadly lanceolate to 10cm long, 7cm wide, and blue-green, green or glaucous in colour. Adult leaves petiolate, lanceolate, 12-20cm long, 2-3.5cm wide, slightly glossy, green, intramarginal vein remote from edge, with a moderate to dense network of veins often visible. Numerous island and intersectional oil glands also visible. Inflorescences axillary, unbranched, peduncles to 1.1cm long, 3 flowered. Buds on pedicels (stalks), ovoid or globular to 1.5cm long, 0.8cm diameter, no scar, with a conical or beaked cap. Fruit on pedicels (stalks), square-like to globular in shape, 4-6 valves descending below rim (Walsh & Entwistle 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Growth Area Street Tree Planting.Pdf
    A Guide to Growth Area Street Tree Planting December 2015 CONTENTS Streetscape Development ................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 Physical and Climatic Conditions .............................................................................................. 5 The Role Of Street Trees ............................................................................................................ 5 Challenges to the Development of Effective Streetscapes ...................................................... 6 Streetscape Design ..................................................................................................................... 7 Layout .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Character ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Council Standards / Procedures .................................................................................................................. 8 Planting Stock ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Planting Preparation & Maintenance ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St Kilda Botanical Gardens | Future Directions Plan
    St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan July 2009 Jill Orr-Young Landscape Architects St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan July 2009 Jill Orr-Young Landscape Architects Sandringham, Victoria Acknowledgements Jeff Baker City of Port Phillip Dwayne Carter City of Port Phillip Ann Cremean (former) City of Port Phillip Kay Rowan City of Port Phillip Chris White City of Port Phillip Steve Fitzgerald Stephen Fitzgerald Arboriculture John Hawker Heritage Victoria Dr Sara Maroske Mueller Correspondence Project, RBG Richard Barley Royal Botanical Gardens Melbourne John Arnott Royal Botanical Gardens Cranbourne The Friends of the St Kilda Botanical Gardens Inc Jill Orr-Young Landscape Architects St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan Contents Title Page No. Summary 1 Introduction 3 Part 1: Botanic Function 6 Plant Collections 6 Major Design Elements 12 Conclusions 18 Part 2: Cultural Heritage Significance 20 Original Design Intent 21 The Central Heritage Core 29 Part 3: Design Guidelines (Case Studies) 35 Part 4: Summary Recommendations 43 References 46 Jill Orr-Young Landscape Architects St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan Appendices 1. Tree Age Estimates 2. Alister Clark Rose Varieties 3. Analysis – Central Heritage Core 4. Ideas for St Kilda Botanical Gardens 2010 5. Tilman W Gloystein 6. Community Comments Jill Orr-Young Landscape Architects St Kilda Botanical Gardens Future Directions Plan Summary Future Directions Plan The future directions plan is not a master plan - which would demand a multi- discipline project team, extensive community consultation, and be more comprehensive and prescriptive in its outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Mosquito Control Guide
    Bird Baths SAFE MOSQUITO Get a Bad Rap CONTROL GUIDE By way of this report, the Sustainability Institute encourages Long Island consumers to seek out and ask for safer alternatives to chemicals to protect themselves from mosquitoes. Mosquito Why are Mosquitoes Prevention Many county governments and the Centers One common misconception a Health Issue? for Disease Control (CDC) recommend the is that bird baths are associat- following: ed with breeding mosquitos, Other Safe Ways to Mosquitoes can be more than just months, and only need a small puddle essentially turning your back- a nuisance. Several common species to breed several hundred larvae. Their • Remove standing water from chil- yard into a mosquito breed- (such as Culex and Aedes) can carry eggs hatch approximately five days dren’s toys stored outdoors, flower ing ground. This is not true, as Control Mosquitoes the West Nile Virus, Eastern Equine after they are laid, so if water is left pots, garbage cans, old tires, or any- thing that collects water. long as you keep debris from Encephalitis and other diseases that standing longer than that it can pro- piling up in the bath and keep For Large Yards or Parks impact humans. West Nile Virus can vide a breeding ground for multiple • Make sure gutters drain properly and it filled with fresh water, mos- produce mild flu-like symptoms or generations of mosquitoes. Female keep gutters free of debris. quitoes will not seek this out more serious manifestations that mosquitoes seek blood to fuel their The Mosquito Magnet® The Rush Hampton Mosquito as a place to breed.
    [Show full text]