DOCSLIB.ORG

Flight Attendant Collective Bargaining Agreement TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flight Attendant Collective Bargaining Agreement TABLE of CONTENTS 2015 Flight Attendant Collective Bargaining Agreement TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Recognition SECTION 2: Management Rights SECTION 3: Definitions SECTION 4: Reserved SECTION 5: Seniority SECTION 6: Training and Proficiency Checks SECTION 7: Furlough and Recall SECTION 8: Vacations SECTION 9: Uniforms SECTION 10: Paid Time Off SECTION 11: Union Security SECTION 12: Equal Opportunity SECTION 13: Home Base Airports SECTION 14: Special Assignments SECTION 15: Reserved SECTION 16: Leaves of Absence SECTION 17: Labor Management Cooperation SECTION 18: Union Representation SECTION 19: Scheduling SECTION 20: Travel Expense SECTION 21: Grievance Procedure SECTION 22: System Board of Adjustment SECTION 23: General Conditions SECTION 24: Insurance and Other Benefits SECTION 25: Physical Examination SECTION 26: Internment, Prisoner, Missing or Hostage SECTION 27: Salary, Overtime, extended Days, Miscellaneous SECTION 28: Hours of Service SECTION 29: 401K Retirement Plan SECTION 30: Duration JOINTLY AGREED UPON LIST OF NUMBERED SIDE LETTERS Page 1 of 190 AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into by and between NetJets Aviation, Inc. (hereinafter "Company") and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division (hereinafter "Union") as representative of Flight Attendants of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, (hereinafter the "Act" or RLA) in the mutual interests of the Flight Attendants and the Company to promote the safety and continuity of air transportation, to further the efficiency and economy of operations, and to provide for orderly collective bargaining relations pertaining to rates of pay, rules or working conditions, between the Company and its Flight Attendants. Page 2 of 190 SECTION 1 – RECOGNITION 1.1 Pursuant to the certification by the National Mediation Board in Case No. R-6820 dated July 12, 2001, this Agreement is made and entered into between NetJets Aviation, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Company" and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, hereinafter referred to as "Union", representing the employees composing the craft and class of Flight Attendants. The Company or employees will not negotiate individually on matters covered by this Agreement. 1.2 This Agreement shall supersede all previous Agreements by and between the Company and the Union or any other labor organization or individual with respect to the Flight Attendants described above and shall constitute the sole Agreement between the Company and the Union. Any and all agreements made by the parties shall be reduced to writing and signed by the authorized representatives. An “authorized representative” of the Union shall be any authorized agent of the Teamsters Airline Division, including the President or Business Agent of Local 284. 1.3 Scope of Agreement 1.3(A) This Agreement covers all Flight Attendants in the employ of the Company who are employed and assigned within the United States and its territories, and Flight Attendants in such positions when assigned to those segments of international passenger flights flown, or under the functional control of, the Company, its affiliates, or the Company’s parent corporation, NetJets, Inc., which originate or terminate in the United States and its territories, and also Flight Attendants in such positions when assigned at the discretion of the Company on other international passenger flights, or to a foreign domicile pursuant to this Agreement; provided, all flights referenced herein are flown by pilots on the NetJets Aviation, Inc. Seniority List. Any Canadian NetJets Program established by the Company, its parent or any affiliate shall be covered by this Agreement. 1.3(B) All present and future Flight Attendant Services offered to owners/lessees/customers of the Company or its affiliates on aircraft operated by Pilots on the Pilot System Seniority List of NetJets Aviation, Inc. shall be performed exclusively by the Flight Attendants on the NetJets Aviation, Inc. Flight Attendant System Seniority List under the terms of this Agreement. Page 3 of 190 1.3(C) In the event that the NetJets-NJASAP Pilot System Board of Adjustment finds the Company to have violated any provision relating to allocation of flying in Section 1 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between NJASAP, or its successors or assigns and NetJets Aviation, Inc., as it may be amended from time to time, (1) Flight Attendants covered by this Agreement shall thereafter perform Flight Attendant Services on any and all new flying allocated to NetJets Pilots as a result of the award of the System Board of Adjustment; and (2) the Union may file a grievance under Sections 21 this Agreement for the limited purpose of seeking relief for any loss of compensation suffered by one or more Flight Attendants as a result of the violation. 1.4 Successor Transactions 1.4(A) General 1.4(A)(1) The Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. Any transaction that involves a transfer (in a single transaction or in a series of related multi-step transactions) to a Successor of ownership or control of the Company and/or substantially all of its assets shall be a “Successor Transaction” and subject to this Agreement. 1.4(A)(2) No contract or other legally binding commitment involving the transfer of ownership or control pursuant to a Successor Transaction will be signed or otherwise entered into unless it is agreed, as a material and irrevocable condition of entering into, concluding and implementing such transaction that the Successor shall assume the employment of Flight Attendants on the NetJets Aviation, Inc. Flight Attendant System Seniority List in accordance with the status quo consisting of the applicable rates of pay, rules and working conditions set forth in this Agreement (including its merger protections). 1.4(A)(3) The Company shall give written notice of the existence of this Agreement, and a copy of this Agreement to any proposed Successor before the Company and the proposed Successor enter into any arrangement or agreement in principle with respect to a potential Successor Transaction. A copy of the notice submitted to the proposed Successor shall be provided to the Union under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request when permitted by applicable law, regulations and any confidentiality agreements, the latter of which will not extend beyond the negotiation of Page 4 of 190 the written definitive agreement. 1.4(B) Cabin Crew Member Protections In the Event of a Successorship Transaction Unless otherwise agreed, the following provisions shall apply in the event of a Successor Transaction that may affect the employment and/or seniority rights of Flight Attendants on the NetJets Aviation, Inc. Flight Attendant System Seniority List. These provisions shall apply if the Company is acquired by another air carrier, and shall bind the Successor or surviving air carrier regardless of the form of the transaction. 1.4(B)(1) The integration of the seniority lists of the respective flight attendant groups shall be governed by Sections 3 and 13 of the Allegheny-Mohawk Labor Protective Provisions (“LPPs”). The parties shall promptly initiate the seniority integration procedures of Sections 3 and 13 following announcement of an operational merger affecting the seniority of the flight attendant groups. The Company or other Successor, as appropriate, shall accept the integrated seniority list. There will be no system flush or removal of flight attendants from their positions as a result of seniority list integration. 1.4(B)(2) Prior to integration of seniority lists in accordance with paragraph (b)(i) above, the parties shall negotiate a mutually agreeable fence agreement. The fences shall remain in effect until seniority lists and CBAs are merged. Until the fences are removed, all aircraft (including orders and options to purchase aircraft) and the operations of each pre-transaction carrier shall remain separated. If the fence agreement cannot be reached within sixty (60) days of a request by either party to begin negotiations, all unresolved issues shall be submitted to interest arbitration. The arbitrator’s resolution of the disputed issues shall be on an issue-by-issue basis, rather than a “total package” basis, and shall be binding on the parties with respect to the particular dispute, but shall have no precedential or binding effect on other or future disputes arising under this subparagraph. 1.4(B)(3) Unless and until an operational merger is finally effectuated, the Union will continue to be recognized as the representative of the pre-merger Flight Attendant craft or class to the extent provided by law. In the event of an operational merger, the representative of the post-merger craft or class will be established pursuant to Section 2, Ninth of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Page 5 of 190 1.4(B)(4) Prior to an operational merger, the surviving air carrier and the representative of the consolidated, post-merger Flight Attendant craft or class will negotiate modifications to the collective bargaining agreement necessary to permit the integration. If a modified agreement is not executed within nine (9) months from the date a final and binding integrated Flight Attendant Seniority List is issued, the parties shall submit outstanding issues to binding interest arbitration. The arbitrator’s resolution of the disputed issues shall be on an issue- by-issue basis, rather than a “total package” basis, and shall be binding on the parties with respect to the particular dispute, but shall have no precedential or binding effect on other or future disputes arising under this subparagraph. Until such time as a fully merged agreement is reached, either through bargaining or arbitration, the surviving air carrier may continue to operate the two carriers separately. 1.4(B)(5) The Company will not furlough or involuntarily displace any Flight Attendants on the NetJets Aviation, Inc. Flight Attendant System Seniority List in anticipation of a Successorship Transaction in order to deprive them of the protection provided by this Section.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Files Series, 1932-75
    GENERAL FILE SERIES Table of Contents Subseries Box Numbers Subseries Box Numbers Annual Files Annual Files 1933-36 1-3 1957 82-91 1937 3-4 1958 91-100 1938 4-5 1959 100-110 1939 5-7 1960 110-120 1940 7-9 1961 120-130 1941 9-10 1962 130-140 1942-43 10 1963 140-150 1946 10 1964 150-160 1947 11 1965 160-168 1948 11-12 1966 168-175 1949 13-23 1967 176-185 1950-53 24-53 Social File 186-201 1954 54-63 Subject File 202-238 1955 64-76 Foreign File 239-255 1956 76-82 Special File 255-263 JACQUELINE COCHRAN PAPERS GENERAL FILES SERIES CONTAINER LIST Box No. Contents Subseries I: Annual Files Sub-subseries 1: 1933-36 Files 1 Correspondence (Misc. planes) (1)(2) [Miscellaneous Correspondence 1933-36] [memo re JC’s crash at Indianapolis] [Financial Records 1934-35] (1)-(10) [maintenance of JC’s airplanes; arrangements for London - Melbourne race] Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1934 (1)-(7) 2 Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1935 (1)(2) Edmund Jakobi 1934 Re: G.B. Plane Return from England Just, G.W. 1934 Leonard, Royal (Harlan Hull) 1934 London Flight - General (1)-(12) London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables General (1)-(5) [cable file of Royal Leonard, FBO’s London agent, re preparations for race] 3 London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Fueling Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Hangar Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Insurance [London - Melbourne Flight Instructions] (1)(2) McLeod, Fred B. [Fred McLeod Correspondence July - August 1934] (1)-(3) Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • AVIATION COMPETITION Issues Related to the Proposed United Airlines-US Airways Merger
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters December 2000 AVIATION COMPETITION Issues Related to the Proposed United Airlines-US Airways Merger GAO-01-212 Printed copies of this document will be available shortly. P U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1991-523-762 GAO Form 171 Rev. (3/99) Contents Page Letter 3 Appendixes I Scope and Methodology 26 II Combined Domestic and International Measures of Airline Size 30 III Selected Financial Data for Some Major U.S. Airlines, Calendar Year 1999 and First 9 Months, 2000 31 IV Markets in Which the Proposed Merger Could Reduce Competition to Only One or Two Competing Airlines 32 V Markets in Which the Proposed Merger Could Increase Competition 41 VI GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments 45 Figures 1 New United Would Carry Over One-Quarter of All U.S. Passengers 5 2 Map of Domestic Routes Scheduled to Be Flown by New United 7 3 Number of Markets and Passengers Subject to a Loss of Competition Due to the Merger 13 4 Number of Markets and Passengers That Could Benefit From an Increase in Competition 18 Tables 1 1 Measures of Airline Size for the 12 Months Ending June 30, 2000 10 2 Five Largest Markets in Which the Proposed Merger Could Leave Only Two Competitors 14 3 Number and Size of Markets Dominated by Domestic Airlines 15 4 Market Shares of Nonstop Passenger Traffic Between United’s and US Airways’ Hubs 16 5 Analysis of Markets That Would Receive Online Service From New United 19 6 Comparison of Potential Competitive Impact of the Proposed United-US Airways Merger and the Proposed Northwest--Continental Stock Acquisition and Alliance 21 7 DC Air’s Proposed and Other Airlines’ Scheduled Service From Reagan National to Nine Competed Markets 23 8 DC Air’s Proposed Service Faces Significant Challenges Against Other Airlines in the Washington, D.C., Area 24 Related GAO Products Abbreviations DOJ Department of Justice DOT Department of Transportation GAO General Accounting Office 2 United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 December 15, 2000 The Honorable James L.
    [Show full text]
  • March Newsletter 2014
    ISA+21 International Society of Women Airline Pilots March 2014 ISA+21 Chairwoman Nancy “N2” Novaes reports: Mary Ana Gilbert designed our We have just concluded another fabulous WAI Conference. New new banner, member signups have brought our membership to renewed heights; above, to our Scholarship awards were significant, generous and heartfelt. Best generate of all, the professional “face” of ISA+21’s new booth underscored our interest and importance for women airline pilots and women seeking entry into our excitement in field. New banners, new booth setup and an updated logo polished our our organization image and drew crowds. But don’t let me “blow” the good news at Women in reported elsewhere in this newsletter! Suffice it for me to say that Aviation. Membership, Scholarship and WAI are ISA’s “Stars of March.” So read on….. New Members: 2, 13 Ask Amelia: 3-4 It’s a Woman’s World: 5-6 Moscow Conference: 7 Member News: 8-9 In Memory of: 11-12 Scholarship Winners: 14 Emily Warner Howell Honored: 10 Women in Aviation: 15-16 !1 ISA+21 International Society of Women Airline Pilots March 2014 How do you spell Success? Can you say 300? ISA$Welcomes$49$New$Members$ January$15$–$March$15,$2014$ And$a$big$“Welcome$Back”$to$all$our$returning$members.$$$ $$$We$are$glad$to$have$you$with$us$again…304$and$sKll$climbing!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Melinda$Albert$ Moraim$Egurbida$Maldonado$$ Devan$Norris$ Kama$Arseneaux$ Margaret$Eickhoff$ Gretchen$Palmer$ Pamela$Barber$ Kimberly$Ewing$ Beth$Phelps$ Valerie$Barre_$ Lindsey$Glasow$ Louise$Pole$ Chriselda$Beltran$
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS July, 1988
    July, 1988 INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS We're Building An Airline From The Ground Up. or more than 80 years, UPS has been the leader in small parcel delivery. [. \ Now, as we climb to the top in the air, we have many aviation oppor­ tunities for women. To find out more about these outstanding oppor­ tunitiesF for women pilots, please send your resume to: United Parcel Service, P.O. Box 24265, Louisville, KY 40224 Attn: Air Employment. Wfe are an equal opportunity employer m/f. BARBARA SESTITO r n e Politics and fun do mix From the very first meeting, there were bantering and discussion she said, “ I hope Secretary: Doris Abbate disagreements. The minutes of meetings you don’t take this personally.” Treasurer: Pat Forbes held in early 1930 chronicle the discussions “ Never,” I said. of our strong - willed and independent Nothing we do is so earth shattering as to The election of Gene Nora Jessen as your predecessors. For the ensuing 51 years, we lose a friend over. We can disagree without new international president culminates her have pretty much carried on their tradition. being disagreeable, and we can usually find long career of service to the Ninety-Nines. Our members are still strong - willed, in­ some middle ground on which we can both Gene Nora has served on the board of dependent and opinionated on almost any operate. directors for a total of 10 years, and has subject. The important thing to remember is that held every office. I have enjoyed working A very good friend called, basically to let we need to spend more time doing fun with her throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Line Pilot Highlights from ALPA’S Page 26 Official Journal of the Air Line Pilots Air Safety Forum Association, International
    October 2016 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: » Health Watch page 41 » The Landing page 45 » Our Stories page 42 Air Line PilOt Highlights from ALPA’s Page 26 Official Journal of the Air Line Pilots Air Safety Forum Association, International State of the North American Passenger Airline Industry And What’s on the Horizon Page 19 An Update on ALPA’s Strategic Plan Page 34 Follow us on Twitter PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. @wearealpa For ALPA members: Sophisticated portfolio management, automated. Researching, choosing, and managing your investments is time-consuming. Schwab Intelligent PortfoliosTM does the work for you, with no advisory fees, account service fees, or commissions. Just answer 12 straightforward questions about your investment goals, attitude toward risk, and investment timeline, and Schwab Intelligent Portfolios recommends a portfolio. Schwab Intelligent Portfolios technology: • Provides sophisticated investment advice, building an ETF portfolio of up to 20 asset classes • Helps you set, track, and work toward your savings and income goals • Doesn’t charge account service fees, advisory fees, or commissions • Automatically monitors and rebalances your portfolio You’ll have access to Schwab investment professionals 24/7. And our simple online enrollment means you can begin in minutes. Get invested with as little as $5,000. Get started with Schwab Intelligent Portfolios today at intelligent.schwab.com. For more information, call 1-703-689-2270. Brokerage Products: Not FDIC-Insured • No Bank Guarantee • May Lose Value Schwab investment professionals are employees of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. The Charles Schwab Corporation provides a full range of securities, brokerage, banking, money management, and financial advisory services through its operating subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Us Master Pilot Scablist the Unionist's Edition
    THIS IS THE US MASTER PILOT SCABLIST THE UNIONIST’S EDITION A SCAB is A Person Who is Doing What You’d be Doing if You Weren’t on Strike. A SCAB takes your job, a Job he could not get under normal circumstances. He can only advance himself by taking advantage of labor disputes and walking over the backs of workers trying to maintain decent wages and working conditions. He helps management to destroy his and your profession, often ending up under conditions he/she wouldn't even have scabbed for. No matter. A SCAB doesn't think long term, nor does he think of anything other then himself. His smile shows fangs that drip with your blood, for he willingly destroys families, lives, careers, opportunities and professions at the drop of a hat. He takes from a striker what he knows he could never earn by his own merit: a decent Job. He steals that which others earned at the bargaining table through blood, sweat and tears, and throws it away in an instant - ruining lives, jobs and careers. ONCE A SCAB, ALWAYS A SCAB - NEVER FORGET! Below are brief notes about legal strikes by organized pilots. 1. Century Airlines 1932: Pilots struck to resist wage reduction by E.L Cord, the patron saint of Frank Lorenzo. 2. TWA 1946: Pilots struck over pay on faster 4 engine aircraft, limited by the provisions of Decision 83. 3. National Airlines 1948: Strike over aircraft safety and repeated violations of the labor contract. 4. Western Airlines 1958: Qualifications of the Flight Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicative Experiences of African American Female Pilots on the Flight Deck: an Application of Co-Cultural Theory and Narrat
    Communicative Experiences of African American Female Pilots on the Flight Deck: An Application of Co-Cultural Theory and Narrative Nonfiction to Inform Crew Resource Management by Michael L. Zirulnik A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved September 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Janet Alberts, Co-Chair Benjamin Broome, Co-Chair Lee Gutkind Mark Orbe ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2015 © 2015 Michael L. Zirulnik All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This study sought to inform the curriculum of crew resource management (CRM) for multi-pilot flight deck operations. The CRM curriculum requires continued reexamination to ensure safe flight in the changing demographic of flight decks in the US. The study calls attention to the CRM curriculum’s insufficient inclusion of robust training components to address intercultural communication skills and conflict management strategies. Utilizing a phenomenological approach, the study examined the communicative experiences of African American female military and airline transport pilots on the flight deck and within the aviation industry. Co-cultural theory was used as a theoretical framework to investigate these co-researcher’s (pilots) experiences. A parallel goal of the investigation was to better understand raced and gendered communication as they occur in this specific context—the flight deck of US airlines and military aircraft. The researcher conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews and shadowed two co-researchers (pilots) for a period of days and built a relationship with them over the course of one year. Eight years of preparation working in the airline industry situated the researcher for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Black History in the Last Frontier
    Black History in the Last History Black Frontier Black History Black History in the Last Frontier provides a chronologically written narrative to encompass the history of African Americans in in the Last Frontier Alaska. Following an evocative foreword from activist and community organizer, Ed Wesley, the book begins with a discussion of black involvement in the Paciÿc whaling industry during the middle and late-nineteenth century. It then discusses how the Gold Rush and the World Wars shaped Alaska and brought thousands of black migrants to the territory. °e ÿnal chapters analyze black history in Alaska in our contemporary era. It also presents a series of biographical sketches of notable black men and women who passed through or settled in Alaska and contributed to its politics, culture, and social life. °is book highlights the achievements and contributions of Alaska’s black community, while demonstrating how these women and men have endured racism, fought injustice, and made a life and home for themselves in the forty-ninth state. Indeed, what one then ÿnds in this book is a history not well known, a history of African Americans in the last frontier. Ian C. Hartman / Ed Wesley C. Hartman Ian National Park Service by Ian C. Hartman University of Alaska Anchorage With a Foreword by Ed Wesley Black History in the Last Frontier by Ian C. Hartman With a Foreword by Ed Wesley National Park Service University of Alaska Anchorage 1 Hartman, Ian C. Black History in the Last Frontier ISBN 9780996583787 National Park Service University of Alaska Anchorage HIS056000 History / African American Printed in the United States of America Edited by Kaylene Johnson Design by David Freeman, Anchorage, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRCRAFT CABIN AIR CONFERENCE Flight Safety and Cabin Air Quality
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is a professional association and industrial ( committed to raising awareness and fnding solutions organisation for commercial pilots in Australia. ( to poor air quality in aircraft. Established in 2006, the As a professional association, it provides pilots the +)&A$(7>(8;<(2<5=791(3B1597C58739(B<DB<><98791(( opportunity to meet and discuss aviation-related air crew (pilots, cabin crew and engineers) and ( matters. Its Technical Committee is involved in the passengers, that deals specifcally with contaminated development of Australian and international aviation air issues and cabin air quality. The GCAQE represents safety standards. As an industrial organisation, its ( over 30 organisations, and over one hundred ( B32<(7>(83(7EDB3@<(<ED23?E<98(639=78739>(:3B(78>(( thousand workers around the world. members, including collective bargaining, ( ,$!-.)*#, negotiating labour contracts, representing members involved in a dispute with their employer or assistance in the event of an accident or incident. !%!/)*#,)!0 1!>>'!+#*01!$+ Technical innovation, custom design engineering, dedicated customer support and years of experience in the development and deployment of robust integrated fltration and separation equipment are the key elements which make Pall Aerospace a reliable D5B89<B(79(8;<(7ED2<E<9858739(3:(63985E7958739( @)"&+'&=+'@)"*)'' control solutions for aircraft cabin air environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting of 'Pre Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland
    REGULAR MEETING OF 'PRE BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND The meeting was held on Tuesday, January 3, 1984, at the hour of 4:00 p.m. in the office of the Board, Room 376, 66 Jack London Square, Oakland, California, President Pineda presiding, due written notice having been given to members of the Board. Commissioners present: Creque, Eng, Goodroe, Higgins, Smith, and President Pineda - 6 Commissioners absent: Hunter - 1 Also present were the Executive Director; Deputy Executive Director; Director of Administrative Services; Chief Engineer; Assistant Chief Engineer; Director of Aviation; Airport Manager; Manager, General Aviation; Director of Fiscal Affairs; Director of Properties; Commercial Representative John Ablan; General Manager, Marine Terminals; Director of Public Affairs; and Secretary of the Board. Approval to Dispense with Bids for Purchase of Concrete Riprap Material for Emergency Stockpile, Oakland Airport was the subject of a memo to the Board from Port Principal Engineer Thomas H. Daniels, notifying the Board that the Ports emergency stockpile of riprap was used during the recent storm which damaged the dike at the Airport. Inquiries were made to acquire immediate replacement fill for emergency purposes. It was recommended that the Board find it to be in the best interests of the Port to dispense with formal bids and authorize the Chief Engineer to purchase 10,000 cubic yards of concrete riprap at a unit price not to exceed $4.00 per cubic yard. The recommendation was approved on passage of Resolution No. 28208. BOARF. OF PORT COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF JAN 1 7 1985( APPROVED ?is ED A RD.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Annual Report
    1600 Smith Street Houston, Texas 77002 www.expressjet.com 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 Departures... E x p r e s s J e t 2004 Annual Report And Counting. THE VIEW FROM 35,000 FEET In the three years since our initial public offering, ExpressJet has grown to become the largest regional airline in the world and the one regional airline featured in Fortune’s list of “America’s Most Admired Companies” for 2004. We work with one goal in mind: to efficiently and economically provide exceptional regional jet service to the communities we serve. 245 Jet Aircraft... BUT IT ALL STARTS WITH ONE: One plane out of the ExpressJet fleet of 245 aircraft. One ERJ-145XR capable of 1,500 nautical miles, uniting communities such as Bakersfield, California, St. John’s, Newfoundland or Huatulco, Mexico. Aircraft equipped with advanced technology and certifications that aid our operation in challenging weather conditions, as well as enabling more cost-effective operations at higher flight levels. One seamless service experience for our partner’s passengers: leather seating, in-flight meal and beverage service capabilities, jet-bridge loading 2 ExpressJet 2004 Annual Report And Growing. in most locations, valet luggage service and a seating configuration that provides customers with only window or aisle seating. One fleet type with almost 100 percent commonality from the engines to the flight deck, producing cross-utilization opportunities, economies of scale and efficiencies and allowing us to exceed our 2004 financial objectives – all while reducing the unit cost for our services and improving our reliability. 2004 Annual Report ExpressJet 3 13 Million Passengers..
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory Rodi, Et Al. V. Expressjet Holdings Inc., Et Al. 10-CV-03261
    Case 4:10-cv-03261 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/10/10 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT' OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION GREGORY RODI, on Behalf of Himself and § No. All Others Similarly Situated, § § CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, § vs. § COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF § FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND VIOLATIONS EXPRESSJETHOLDINGS, INC., THOMAS § OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT M. HANLEY, LAMPHUNG NGO-BURNS, § OF 1934 GEORGE R. BRAVANTE, JR., JANET M. § CLARKE, KIM A. FADEL, JUDITH R. § HABERKORN, SALVATORE J. § BADALAMENTI, BONNIE S. REITZ . T. § PATRICK KELLY, ALAN H. § FREUDENSTEEN, EXPRESSJET, § SKYWEST, INC., ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST § AIRLINES, INC., and EXPRESS § DELAWARE MERGER CO., § Defendants. § § DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 4:10-cv-03261 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/10/10 Page 2 of 33 INTRODUCTION 1. This is a stockholder class action brought by plaintiff on behalf of the holders of ExpressJet Holdings Inc. ("ExpressJet" or the "Company") common stock against the Company, certain of its officers and directors, Express Delaware Merger Co. ("Express"), SkyWest, Inc. ("SkyWest"), and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. ("Atlantic Southeast"). This action arises out the defendants' violations of federal and state law in pursuing the proposed sale of ExpressJet to SkyWest for $6.75 per share in cash (the "Proposed Acquisition"), 2. The Proposed Acquisition is the result of an unfair and self-serving process. The price of $6.75 per share which resulted from this process materially undervalues the Company and is unfair to its stockholders. 3. In pursuing the Proposed Acquisition, SkyWest is attempting to take advantage of ExpressJet's temporarily depressed stock price.
    [Show full text]