Anicdotes Newsletter Issue 7
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mesostigmata No
16 (1) · 2016 Christian, A. & K. Franke Mesostigmata No. 27 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 – 41 Acarological literature .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2016 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2015 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Publications, additions 2014 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Publications, additions 2013 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Publications, additions 2012 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Publications, additions 2011 ...................................................................................................................................................................... -
Namadgi National Park Plan of Management 2010
PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 2010 Namadgi National Park Namadgi National NAMADGI NATIONAL PARK PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 2010 NAMADGI NATIONAL PARK PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 2010 NAMADGI NATIONAL PARK PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 2010 © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2010 ISBN 978-0-642-60526-9 Conservation Series: ISSN 1036-0441: 22 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without the written permission of Land Management and Planning Division, Department of Territory and Municipal Services, GPO Box 158, Canberra ACT 2601. Disclaimer: Any representation, statement, opinion, advice, information or data expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith but on the basis that the ACT Government, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason or negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement, advice, information or date referred to above. Published by Land Management and Planning Division (10/0386) Department of Territory and Municipal Services Enquiries: Phone Canberra Connect on 13 22 81 Website: www.tams.act.gov.au Design: Big Island Graphics, Canberra Printed on recycled paper CONTENTS NAMADGI NATIONAL PARK PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 2010 Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... -
The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State -
BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)
BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (TAKIM DÜZEYİNDE) GÖKHAN AYDIN 2016 Editör : Gökhan AYDIN Dizgi : Ziya ÖNCÜ ISBN : 978-605-87432-3-6 Böceklerin Sınıflandırılması isimli eğitim amaçlı hazırlanan bilgisayar programı için lütfen aşağıda verilen linki tıklayarak programı ücretsiz olarak bilgisayarınıza yükleyin. http://atabeymyo.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/76/files/siniflama-05102016.exe Eğitim Amaçlı Bilgisayar Programı ISBN: 978-605-87432-2-9 İçindekiler İçindekiler i Önsöz vi 1. Protura - Coneheads 1 1.1 Özellikleri 1 1.2 Ekonomik Önemi 2 1.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 2 2. Collembola - Springtails 3 2.1 Özellikleri 3 2.2 Ekonomik Önemi 4 2.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 4 3. Thysanura - Silverfish 6 3.1 Özellikleri 6 3.2 Ekonomik Önemi 7 3.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 7 4. Microcoryphia - Bristletails 8 4.1 Özellikleri 8 4.2 Ekonomik Önemi 9 5. Diplura 10 5.1 Özellikleri 10 5.2 Ekonomik Önemi 10 5.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 11 6. Plocoptera – Stoneflies 12 6.1 Özellikleri 12 6.2 Ekonomik Önemi 12 6.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 13 7. Embioptera - webspinners 14 7.1 Özellikleri 15 7.2 Ekonomik Önemi 15 7.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 15 8. Orthoptera–Grasshoppers, Crickets 16 8.1 Özellikleri 16 8.2 Ekonomik Önemi 16 8.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 17 i 9. Phasmida - Walkingsticks 20 9.1 Özellikleri 20 9.2 Ekonomik Önemi 21 9.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 21 10. Dermaptera - Earwigs 23 10.1 Özellikleri 23 10.2 Ekonomik Önemi 24 10.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 24 11. Zoraptera 25 11.1 Özellikleri 25 11.2 Ekonomik Önemi 25 11.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 26 12. -
Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Article 4 October 1975 Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera M G. de Viedma University of Madrid M L. Nelson Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation de Viedma, M G. and Nelson, M L. 1975. "Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. de Viedma and Nelson: Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILIES OF COLEOPTERA M. G. de viedmal and M. L. els son' Several works on the order Coleoptera have appeared in recent years, some of them creating new superfamilies, others modifying the constitution of these or creating new families, finally others are genera1 revisions of the order. The authors believe that the current classification of this order, incorporating these changes would prove useful. The following outline is based mainly on Crowson (1960, 1964, 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) and Crowson and Viedma (1964). For characters used on classification see Viedma (1972) and for family synonyms Abdullah (1969). Major features of this conspectus are the rejection of the two sections of Adephaga (Geadephaga and Hydradephaga), based on Bell (1966) and the new sequence of Heteromera, based mainly on Crowson (1966), with adaptations. -
ACT, Australian Capital Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Wikipedia Beetles Dung Beetles Are Beetles That Feed on Feces
Wikipedia beetles Dung beetles are beetles that feed on feces. Some species of dung beetles can bury dung times their own mass in one night. Many dung beetles, known as rollers , roll dung into round balls, which are used as a food source or breeding chambers. Others, known as tunnelers , bury the dung wherever they find it. A third group, the dwellers , neither roll nor burrow: they simply live in manure. They are often attracted by the dung collected by burrowing owls. There are dung beetle species of different colours and sizes, and some functional traits such as body mass or biomass and leg length can have high levels of variability. All the species belong to the superfamily Scarabaeoidea , most of them to the subfamilies Scarabaeinae and Aphodiinae of the family Scarabaeidae scarab beetles. As most species of Scarabaeinae feed exclusively on feces, that subfamily is often dubbed true dung beetles. There are dung-feeding beetles which belong to other families, such as the Geotrupidae the earth-boring dung beetle. The Scarabaeinae alone comprises more than 5, species. The nocturnal African dung beetle Scarabaeus satyrus is one of the few known non-vertebrate animals that navigate and orient themselves using the Milky Way. Dung beetles are not a single taxonomic group; dung feeding is found in a number of families of beetles, so the behaviour cannot be assumed to have evolved only once. Dung beetles live in many habitats , including desert, grasslands and savannas , [9] farmlands , and native and planted forests. They are found on all continents except Antarctica. They eat the dung of herbivores and omnivores , and prefer that produced by the latter. -
Anicdotes • ISSUE 17 October 2020
1 ISSUE 17 • October 2020 The official newsletter of the Australian National Insect Collection CSIRO NATIONAL FACILITIES AND COLLECTIONS www.csiro.au INSIDE THIS ISSUE The pandemic response issue David Yeates, Director The pandemic response issue ....................................... 1 We compile this issue as the dumpster fire of a year from Award from our CSIRO Business Unit, hell lurches through its final few months. Usually a vibrant Digital National Facilities and Collections. Welcome to new staff ...................................................2 community for entomologists from all over Australia and the These awards are always heavily world, ANIC has been an eerily quiet place during the depths ANIC wins DNFC 2020 award ........................................3 contested, not least because we are of the pandemic. All our Volunteers, Honorary Fellows, always competing against an army of very Visiting Scientists and Postgraduate Students were asked to Marvel flies a media hit .................................................3 compelling entries from the astronomers stay home. Visitors were not permitted. Under CSIRO’s COVID in DNFC. Congratulations to Andreas response planning, many of our staff worked from home. All our Australian Weevils Volume IV published ...................... 4 and the team. The second significant international trips were postponed, including the International achievement is the publication of Congress of Entomology in Helsinki in July. This has caused some Australian Weevils Volume 4, focussing on Donations: Phillip Sawyer Collection ............................5 David Yeates delay to research progress, as primary types held in overseas the broad-nosed weevils of the subfamily The Waite Institute nematodes come to ANIC ............ 6 institutions could not be examined and species identities could Entiminae. This is a very significant evolutionary radiation of not be confirmed. -
The Landcare Perspective the Quarterly Newsletter of the Upper Shoalhaven and Upper Deua Catchments
Biodiversity Special Issue SUMMER 2016 The Landcare Perspective The Quarterly Newsletter of the Upper Shoalhaven and Upper Deua Catchments are dull coloured, with browns and DATE Butterflies of the Upper yellows predominating. They have a Summer 2016 rapid wingbeat and a Shoalhaven quick, moth-like flight, Inside this issue: Kim Pullen often near ground level. Caterpillars of Butterflies of the Upper 1, The insect fauna of the Upper Shoalhaven is the two species of Shoalhaven 3,11 that which is characteristic of the cold, Trapezites phigalioides open grassy valleys and wooded ridges of ‘Flats’ feed on a range Updates 2 Source: OEH: Shane the Southern Tablelands of NSW, together of broad-leaved Ruming Green Army 3 with some coastal elements penetrating plants, but those of Australian Native Bees 4, 5 along the eastern escarpment. This short the remainder, 7, 9 treatment will cover the southern part of comprising Ochres Braidwood Bird Surveys the catchment centered on Braidwood, (Trapezites), Grass- 2015 - Canberra 6 home to about 70 butterfly species. It will skippers (Toxidia), Ornithological Group describe some of the more commonly seen Shield-skippers Emerging Weeds: 8 species, as well as (Signeta), Sedge- Ox eye daisy some other notable skippers (Hesperilla, Imperial Jezebel Delias harpalyce Photographer: Jembaicumbene 1859 - 9 Oreisplanus) and but less common Russel Best William Stanley Jevons ones. Grass-darts (Ocybadistes, Suniana, Taractrocera), Wombats - Vombatus 10, In the Upper ursinus 11 among others, have monocotyledonous Shoalhaven there are host plants, mainly grasses and sedges. Contact Biodiversity five families of Manager Felicity Sturgiss butterflies: Skippers Most of the 17 Australian Swallowtail Ph: 0427 111 101 (Hesperiidae) with species are tropical, and only the [email protected] about 27 species; Macleay’s (see image left) and Orchard Biodiversity Website: Swallowtails Swallowtails reach our region. -
Soil Mite Communities (Acari: Mesostigmata) As Indicators of Urban Ecosystems in Bucharest, Romania M
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Soil mite communities (Acari: Mesostigmata) as indicators of urban ecosystems in Bucharest, Romania M. Manu1,5*, R. I. Băncilă2,3,5, C. C. Bîrsan1, O. Mountford4 & M. Onete1 The aim of the present study was to establish the efect of management type and of environmental variables on the structure, abundance and species richness of soil mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in twelve urban green areas in Bucharest-Romania. Three categories of ecosystem based upon management type were investigated: protected area, managed (metropolitan, municipal and district parks) and unmanaged urban areas. The environmental variables which were analysed were: soil and air temperature, soil moisture and atmospheric humidity, soil pH and soil penetration resistance. In June 2017, 480 soil samples were taken, using MacFadyen soil core. The same number of measures was made for quantifcation of environmental variables. Considering these, we observed that soil temperature, air temperature, air humidity and soil penetration resistance difered signifcantly between all three types of managed urban green area. All investigated environmental variables, especially soil pH, were signifcantly related to community assemblage. Analysing the entire Mesostigmata community, 68 species were identifed, with 790 individuals and 49 immatures. In order to highlight the response of the soil mite communities to the urban conditions, Shannon, dominance, equitability and soil maturity indices were quantifed. With one exception (numerical abundance), these indices recorded higher values in unmanaged green areas compared to managed ecosystems. The same trend was observed between diferent types of managed green areas, with metropolitan parks having a richer acarological fauna than the municipal or district parks. -
Anicdotes • ISSUE 1 AUGUST 2012
1 ISSUE 9 • OCTOBER 2016 The official newsletter of the Australian National Insect Collection CSIRO NATIONAL FACILITIES AND COLLECTIONS www.csiro.au Welcome to our second issue of 2016 INSIDE THIS ISSUE David Yeates, Director Welcome to our second issue of 2016 ....................1 This issue has been delayed because many ANIC staff attended Coleoptera reports on a recent trip to Welcome Juanita, our new hymenopterist ............2 the International Congress of Entomology during the last week Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou. of September, and we wanted to include a report from the Her visit strengthens the links between Welcome Thomas, our new DAWR Liaison Officer 3 conference in this issue. Most importantly, Adam Ślipiński was the ANIC and China. Andreas Zwick was awarded the Westwood Medal in a ceremony at the Congress. invited to instruct overseas at workshops Our Chinese Students .............................................3 ANIC staff have received two of the five Westwood medals in China and Ecuador. You Ning Su A welcome to ANIC for Michael Braby and his A awarded so far, which is an incredible achievement reports on his June visit to increase Field Guide to Australian Butterflies ......................4 digital imaging capabilities in Lao PRD This issue also includes introductions for two new members and Thailand. Adam Ślipiński and Cate of staff, our new hymenopterist Dr Juanita Rodriguez, and a The International Congress of Entomology and the also hosted three Australians and one David Yeates biosecurity entomologist Thomas Wallenius. Juanita is a native Westwood Medal ...................................................5 New Zealand Entomologist for a two- of Colombia, but comes to us via PhD and postdoctoral studies week intensive training course in longicorn ANIC contributions to the International Congress in the USA. -
Anicdotes • ISSUE 5 September 2014
1 ISSUE 5• SEPTEMBER 2014 The official newsletter of the Australian National Insect Collection CSIRO NATIONAL FACILITIES AND COLLECTIONS www.csiro.au Our fifth issue David Yeates, Director, ANIC INSIDE THIS ISSUE The months since issue 4 of ANICdotes have seen many staff the beetle identification course travel to conferences, and others hunker down through the instructed by Adam Slipinski and K Our fifth issue ..........................................................1 Canberra winter, mostly adapting to the new Collections Cate Lemann. Nicole Fisher Beetle research group win the Whitley Medal for and Facilities area of CSIRO, and research. David Yeates, provides an account of the 2014 ........................................................................2 postdoc Karen Meusemann and PhD student Michaela Purcell DigitalSpecimen conference in all attended the 8th International Congress of Dipterology Berlin she attended September 8th International Congress of Dipterology, in Potsdam, Germany, in August. Michaela’s poster on – Nicole presented on the mass Germany .................................................................2 maternity in the multilocular galls formed by Fergusoninidae digitization initiatives in the CSIRO flies won first prize at the Congress, and we have an article 2014 Beetle Course ................................................3 collections. Debbie Jennings about this award in this issue. On the topic of awards, Adam and Ted Edwards report on the Weevilling in the ANIC and beyond ........................4 Slipinski