THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY of SAM HOUSTON THESIS Presented

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY of SAM HOUSTON THESIS Presented /Vr/ THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF SAM HOUSTON THESIS Presented to the Graduate School of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By John D. Daniels, B.A. Denton, Texas December, 1990 Daniels, John D., The Political Philosophy of Sam Houston. Master of Arts (History), December 1990, 299 pp., bibliography, 193 titles. Although most Americans view Sam Houston as a military leader and practical politician with little understanding of intellectual issues, he actually possessed a complex moral and political philosophy which he elaborated and demonstrated during a fifty-year public career. He based his philosophy on a mixture of Christian idealism and pragmatic realism, with duty, honor, and strict morality serving to restrain his love of reality, reason, and physical pleasures. The dual nature of his moral beliefs extended into his politics, which mixed Jeffersonian republicanism, individual rights, and limited government, with Jacksonian democracy, the needs of society, and the will of the people. Throughout most of his career he kept those conflicting sets of ideals successfully in balance, with only the turmoil of the 1850s leading him into extreme positions. Copyright by John D. Daniels 1990 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I wish to express my gratitude to Jim B. Pearson, who contributed much to the development of this work before his untimely death. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . .. a......... 1 2. PERSONAL LIFE AND PUBLIC CAREER......... 9 3. PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY AND BASIC BELIEFS ..*.* .0 34 4. INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT 64 5. MANIFEST DESTINY AND INDIAN POLICY . .. .. 97 6. LAND POLICY AND BOUNDARY DISPUTES ....... 130 7. CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT AND EXECUTIVE POWERS .............a..... 157 8. FOREIGN DIPLOMACY AND INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION ........................ 192 9. ECONOMIC POLICY AND GOVERNMENT FINANCE . 214 10. CONCLUSION . a . 257 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................ ....... 285 V CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION An extensive body of literature already exists on the subject of Sam Houston. Biographers have produced many different treatments of his life, with their contents ranging from uncritical praises of Houston's virtues and popular tales of his life and times, to scholarly analyses of his actions and motives. Historians have investigated many aspects of his life in minute detail. 2 With such an impressive quantity of work already in print, the creation of yet another volume requires some explanation. Basically, the current body of work neglects two important aspects of Sam Houston. The first neglected aspect lies in the area of overall interpretation. Books and articles have covered parts of Houston's career over and over again. For example, scholarly journals and popular magazines have published many articles about the battle of San Jacinto.3 Numerous articles have also covered various other military campaigns that involved Houston, such as the Snively Expedition and the Mier Expedition. 4 No author, however, has attempted to tie all those military campaigns together in a general discussion of Houston's military policies and military strategies. Similarly, a vast number of books and articles 1 have dealt with various topics concerning Houston's policies towards the Indians, but few authors have tried to unite all those topics into a general discussion of Houston and Indian policy.5 Nonetheless, though such topical overviews are few in number and limited in scope, they do exist. What is completely missing is an overview of all of Houston's public policies. No one has tried to analyze those policies and then to integrate them into a statement of his political philosophy. This volume will attempt to provide that missing overall interpretation. After presenting a brief summary of Houston's life, it offers topical overviews of all the major subjects that Houston addressed during his public career. The concluding chapter then attempts to integrate the topical overviews into one overall summary of Houston's political philosophy. Critical scholars could offer three major objections, or questions, to such a procedure. First, is there sufficient, appropriate evidence to make such a procedure valid? Houston's public career lasted from 1813 to 1861. During those forty-eight years he was usually in some position of public trust, at various times holding military commands, executive positions, and legislative posts. In the process he left behind an extensive public record, including eight volumes of private letters, public documents, and public speeches.6 Since he held both 2 executive and legislative positions, his actions serve as a check on his speeches. Simply put, this extensive body of deeds and words, not speculation about Houston's unstated motives or psychology, provides the material for this study. Second, did Houston have a set of ideas which he adhered to consistently enough to be considered a political philosophy? Some military and political leaders are pragmatic men of action who adapt their principles to fit their situation. Such leaders cannot be considered to have a true political philosophy. Houston was not such a man! He rarely changed his views to suit his circumstances, and he was remarkably consistent in his public positions. In fact, he frequently made stands which cost him political popularity. Although he did occasionally contradict himself on a given subject, these inconsistencies usually occurred under extreme circumstances. Third, did Houston simply acquire his principles as a body from someone else, or were his ideas different enough to be worth considering independently? Houston was definitely a Jacksonian. He shared many ideas with his friend and mentor, Andrew Jackson, but he also had some definite differences with him. In addition, Houston spent much of his public life outside the direct influence of Jackson. From 1832 to 1845 Houston lived in Texas, outside of the United States, and in 1845 Jackson died. If Houston was a Jacksonian in his later years, he was one simply 3 because he understood the philosophy well enough to apply it to his own circumstances. In short, his differences in philosophy and his differences in application are significant enough to make Houston worth separate consideration. The second neglected aspect of Sam Houston lies in the area of his significance. Texas historians recognize Houston's importance in the development of Texas, but American historians largely discount his significance in the development of the United States. General histories of the United States usually mention his part in the Battle of San Jacinto, and they occasionally mention his election as the first President of the Texas Republic, but they virtually ignore the rest of his career.8 Most topical histories of the American antebellum period also give Houston little attention. For example, books on pre-Civil War Indian policy rarely even mention him.9 Books on the development of the secession movement do include him, but only as a minor figure of the period, while books on the Jacksonian movement either ignore him altogether or make only minor references to him.10 In one sense the American historians are correct. They are looking for men who had a positive effect on the outcome of historical events. After 1845 Houston had only a minor impact on U.S. events. On the level of political principles, though, he has a much greater significance. He 4 was virtually the only Jacksonian who managed to retain an important political position until the beginning of the Civil War. His career during the 1850s provides an excellent illustration of how an old style democrat reacted to the rise of the new political doctrines which swept the country toward sectional conflict. This volume attempts to show how the battle between Houston and his opponents on a wide range of issues provided a stunning demonstration of the problems and consequences of antebellum political philosophies. 5 Notes 1Popular works include George Creel, Sam Houston: Colossus in Buckskin (New York: Cosmopolitan Book Corporation, 1928); Charles Edward Lester, Life and Achievements of Sam Houston: Hero and Statesman (New York: John B. Alden, 1887). Scholarly analyses include Marquis James, The Raven: A Biography of Sam Houston, introduction by Henry Steele Commager (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1929; reprint, New York: Grosset & Dunlap, [1953]); Llerena B. Friend, Sam Houston: The Great Designer (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1954; reprint, 1969). 2A good example is Jack Gregory and Rennard Strickland, Sam Houston with the Cherokees, 1829-1833 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1967). 3Michael Fluent, "San Jacinto," American History Illustrated 21 (May 1986): 22-31; Jenkins Garrett, "A 1971 Look at San Jacinto," Stirpes 11 (June 1971): 43-7; Allen Lee Hamilton, "Pathway to Retreat Ignored," Military History 5 (October 1988): 18-25; Richard Jackson, "Costliest Nap in Military History," True West 6 (May/June 1959): 12-4, 34. 4Harry A. Gailey, Jr., "Sam Houston and the Texas War Fever, March - August, 1842," Southwestern Historical Quarterly 57 (July 1958): 29-44; Ralph A. Wooster, "Texas Military Operations Against Mexico, 1842-1843," Southwestern Historical Quarterly 67 (April 1964): 465-84. 5 Books and articles on Houston's Indian policies include Mary Whatley Clarke, Chief Bowles and the Texas Cherokees (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1971); Prairie View Malone, Sam Houston's Indians: The Alabama- Coushatti (San Antonio, Tex.: Naylor
Recommended publications
  • Mexican Texas to Independence
    LESSON 8 SOCIAL STUDIES TEKS 4 - 3, 14, 21, 22, 23 TEXAS ALMANAC TEACHERS GUIDE 7 - 1, 2, 3, 21, 22, 23 Mexican Texas to Independence 8 - 6, 29, 30 STAAR • Texas, 1821–1833 4, 7 - Writing - 1, 2, 3 • Prelude to Revolution 4, 7, 8 - Reading - 1, 2, 3 • Winning Independence 8 - Social Studies - 1 INSTRUCTIONAL SUGGESTIONS 1. COLONIST DIARY: Using the “Texas, 1821–1833” section of “A Brief Sketch of Texas History” in the Texas Almanac, students will develop a diary of a colonist. Topics should include (a) why he or she came to Texas, (b) tasks to be completed, (c) weaknesses of Mexican colonial policy, and (d) disagreements with the Mexican government. 2. MYSTERY PICTURE PUZZLE: Students will complete the History Mystery Picture Puzzle using the “Prelude to Revolution” and “Winning Independence” sections of “A Brief Sketch of Texas History.” They should read each statement and determine if it is true or false. If it is true, connect the numbers indicated by the “T.” If it is false, connect the numbers indicated by the “F.” If the answers are correct, students will easily recognize the mystery picture that emerges. 3. TEXAS REVOLUTION CALENDAR: Using the “Winning Independence” section of “A Brief Sketch of Texas History,” students will locate each dated historical event and place it on the Texas Revolution Calendar. 4. INDEPENDENCE ILLUSTRATION: Students will illustrate the journey of Texas toward in- dependence by creating a Texas Independence Highway, using the “Winning Independence” section. Working in small groups, students will construct the highway on large sheets of paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Houston New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Project
    Central Houston New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Project ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 Camden Downtown I 271 2 Broadstone Summer Street 375 3 Lincoln Heights 292 4 St Andrie 232 5 Aspire At 610 282 6 South Main Building 186 7 Le Palais 165 45 8 Dolce Midtown 201 9 Pearl Marketplace At Midtown 264 10 Drewery Place 357 46 11 Regalia At The Park 229 48 12 Preston, The (High Rise) 373 49 3 13 13 Broadstone Heights Waterworks 309 23 21 14 City Place Memorial Park 264 15 Broadstone Arts District 327 16 Broadstone 15th Street Flats 337 16 17 Alta Washington Avenue 204 18 Alexan Lower Heights 375 19 Alexan Memorial 356 20 Crest at Taylor 381 21 Chase Heights I (High Rise) 152 22 Westcott, The (High Rise) 315 43 47 23 Chase Heights II 284 24 Hanover River Oaks (High Rise) 370 25 Gables Westcreek (High Rise) 295 17 20 50 18 51 26 Reverie At River Hollow 304 44 2 15 27 Novel River Oaks 330 22 4 28 Alexan Lynn Park 383 29 Alta West Alabama 304 30 Briar Hollow (High Rise) 200 19 14 12 11 31 Alta Med Main 338 64 32 La Columbe d'Or (High Rise) 285 66 26 37 67 33 2111 Austin 216 42 34 40 34 Montrose At Buffalo Bayou 224 7 8 30 36 1 35 Travis, The (High Rise) 336 39 61 41 36 Driscoll, The (High Rise) 318 68 37 Alta River Oaks 364 54 33 63 9 59 65 38 Broadstone Museum Dist (Hi-Rise) 325 25 10 62 39 1810 Main (High Rise) 290 27 52 32 35 40 800 Crawford (High Rise) 314 24 58 41 Camden Downtown II (High Rise) 289 28 29 42 Navigation Blvd Site 293 53 43 Standard Heights 301 44 Vic, The 165 38 45 1001 West 34th Site 392 46 Slate Heights 287 60 47 White Oak Highline
    [Show full text]
  • Free Land Attracted Many Colonists to Texas in 1840S 3-29-92 “No Quitting Sense” We Claim Is Typically Texas
    “Between the Creeks” Gwen Pettit This is a compilation of weekly newspaper columns on local history written by Gwen Pettit during 1986-1992 for the Allen Leader and the Allen American in Allen, Texas. Most of these articles were initially written and published, then run again later with changes and additions made. I compiled these articles from the Allen American on microfilm at the Allen Public Library and from the Allen Leader newspapers provided by Mike Williams. Then, I typed them into the computer and indexed them in 2006-07. Lois Curtis and then Rick Mann, Managing Editor of the Allen American gave permission for them to be reprinted on April 30, 2007, [email protected]. Please, contact me to obtain a free copy on a CD. I have given a copy of this to the Allen Public Library, the Harrington Library in Plano, the McKinney Library, the Allen Independent School District and the Lovejoy School District. Tom Keener of the Allen Heritage Guild has better copies of all these photographs and is currently working on an Allen history book. Keener offices at the Allen Public Library. Gwen was a longtime Allen resident with an avid interest in this area’s history. Some of her sources were: Pioneering in North Texas by Capt. Roy and Helen Hall, The History of Collin County by Stambaugh & Stambaugh, The Brown Papers by George Pearis Brown, The Peters Colony of Texas by Seymour V. Conner, Collin County census & tax records and verbal history from local long-time residents of the county. She does not document all of her sources.
    [Show full text]
  • School Psychology Program Page 1 Revised August 2020
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY Preparation to Deliver School Psychological Services Program Handbook DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY A Member of The Texas State University System ___________________________________________________ ________________________ Specialist in School Psychology Program Page 1 Revised August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 5 Contact Information .................................................. 6 Mission Statements ………………………………. 8 Program Philosophy .................................................. 10 Program Goals .................................................. 13 Program of Studies .................................................. 17 Recommended Three-Year Sequence .................................................. 19 Course Descriptions .................................................. 20 Academic Policies .................................................. 23 Licensure/Certification/Employment .................................................. 26 Continuing Professional Development .................................................. 27 Admission .................................................. 28 Clinical Training ……………………………….. 31 University Requirements ………………………………. 36 Faculty ……………………………….. 41 CONSULTATION SEQUENCE .................................................. 46 Overview of Courses .................................................. 47 Behavioral Consultation Case PIR Evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution and the Annexation of Texas
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2006 The onsC titution and the Annexation of Texas Earl M. Maltz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Maltz, Earl M., "The onC stitution and the Annexation of Texas" (2006). Constitutional Commentary. 290. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/290 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CONSTITUTION AND THE ANNEXATION OF TEXAS Earl M. Maltz* I. INTRODUCTION The annexation of Texas was by any standard a pivotal moment in the political history of the United States. The deci­ sion to add Texas to the Union was either directly or indirectly responsible for the acquisition of all of the territory of the United States south and west of the Louisiana Purchase. An­ nexation was also a critical issue in the presidential election of 1844 and the more general political struggle between Whigs and Democrats. Moreover, the dispute over Texas was a flashpoint in the evolving sectional conflict between the representatives of the free states and slave states.' The discussions of the issue in Congress had a dual aspect. Many of the arguments both for and against annexation were overtly phrased in terms of expediency. In addition, however, the debate over Texas had an important constitutional dimen­ sion, raising fundamental questions about the structure of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1872: Survivors of the Texas Revolution
    (from the 1872 Texas Almanac) SURVIVORS OF THE TEXAS REVOLUTION. The following brief sketches of some of the present survivors of the Texas revolution have been received from time to time during the past year. We shall be glad to have the list extended from year to year, so that, by reference to our Almanac, our readers may know who among those sketches, it will be seen, give many interesting incidents of the war of the revolution. We give the sketches, as far as possible, in the language of the writers themselves. By reference to our Almanac of last year, (1871) it will be seen that we then published a list of 101 names of revolutionary veterans who received the pension provided for by the law of the previous session of our Legislature. What has now become of the Pension law? MR. J. H. SHEPPERD’S ACCOUNT OF SOME OF THE SURVIVORS OF THE TEXAS REVOLUTION. Editors Texas Almanac: Gentlemen—Having seen, in a late number of the News, that you wish to procure the names of the “veteran soldiers of the war that separated Texas from Mexico,” and were granted “pensions” by the last Legislature, for publication in your next year’s Almanac, I herewith take the liberty of sending you a few of those, with whom I am most intimately acquainted, and now living in Walker and adjoining counties. I would remark, however, at the outset, that I can give you but little information as to the companies, regiments, &c., in which these old soldiers served, or as to the dates, &c., of their discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Sec 3.Pdf
    TXSE_3_10_p214-233 11/22/02 10:15 AM Page 229 Why It Matters Now The constitution written by the 3 Texas Gains Independence Texas delegates to the Consultation established the basis for Texas government today. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA Convention of 1836, 1. Explain the significance of the Convention The Convention of 1836, held while George Childress, ad of 1836. the battles of the Texas Revolution interim, Lorenzo de Zavala, 2. Identify the significance of the year 1836. were being fought, declared that Treaties of Velasco, Texas was independent of Mexico. annexation The Treaties of Velasco marked the end of the Texas Revolution and the beginning of the Republic of Texas. Imagine that the Texas Revolution has just ended. You left your home WHAT Would You Do? during the Revolution for safer ground. Now that the fighting is over, Write your response you are about to return home. What do you expect to find when you get to Interact with History in your Texas Notebook. there? What are your hopes for the newly independent nation of Texas? Time for a Decision While one group of revolutionaries was fighting for Texas on the battlefield, another group was meeting to decide Texas’s fate. The defend- ers at the Alamo were under fire from Santa Anna, and Texas still had not officially declared independence from Mexico. When delegates to the first Consultation met in November 1835, they had a decision to make. Should they support Texas remaining a part of Mexico and continue to work on restoring the state’s rights granted in the Constitution of 1824? Or should they seek independence? They called a second meeting of the Consultation on March 1, 1836, hoping that events would help them make their decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Facets of Texas Legal History
    SMU Law Review Volume 52 Issue 4 Article 9 1999 Facets of Texas Legal History Frances Spears Cloyd Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Frances Spears Cloyd, Facets of Texas Legal History, 52 SMU L. REV. 1653 (1999) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol52/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. FACETS OF TEXAS LEGAL HISTORY Frances Spears Cloyd* OR three hundred years Spain ruled vast areas in the Western hemisphere. She regarded these colonial possessions as being en- tirely the King's, for his use and benefit. She exploited them for royal profit through a tight trade monopoly and extended her laws into them. Her domination was approaching an end when the Anglo-Ameri- cans began to come into Texas. Moses Austin got permission from the Spanish government to take a colony into Texas in 1821. He died before he was able to complete his project and bequeathed the responsibility to his son, Stephen. In this same year Mexico and Spain were clashing. Iturbide led a pow- erful liberal movement based on unity of all classes, independence under a Bourbon prince with power limited by a constitution, and protection of the Catholic Church. Mexico proclaimed her independence from Spain and proceeded to the drafting of an extremely complex constitution.' It was completed and promulgated in 1824.
    [Show full text]
  • SAM HOUSTON PARK: Houston History Through the Ages by Wallace W
    PRESERVATION The 1847 Kellum-Noble House served as Houston Parks Department headquarters for many years. Photo courtesy of Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, HABS, Reproduction number HABS TEX, 101-HOUT, 4-1. SAM HOUSTON PARK: Houston History through the Ages By Wallace W. Saage he history of Texas and the history of the city grant from Austin’s widow, Mrs. J. F. L. Parrot, and laid Tof Houston are inextricably linked to one factor out a new city.1 They named it Houston. – land. Both Texas and Houston used the legacy of The growth of Sam Houston Park, originally called the land to encourage settlement, bringing in a great City Park, has always been closely related to the transfer multicultural mélange of settlers that left a lasting im- of land, particularly the physical and cultural evolution pression on the state. An early Mexican land grant to of Houston’s downtown region that the park borders. John Austin in 1824 led to a far-reaching development Contained within the present park boundaries are sites ac- plan and the founding of a new city on the banks of quired by the city from separate entities, which had erected Buffalo Bayou. In 1836, after the Republic of Texas private homes, businesses, and two cemeteries there. won its independence, brothers John Kirby Allen and Over the years, the city has refurbished the park, made Augustus C. Allen purchased several acres of this changes in the physical plant, and accommodated the increased use of automobiles to access a growing downtown. The greatest transformation of the park, however, grew out of the proposed demoli- tion of the original Kellum House built on the site in 1847.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Jones: Last First Lady of the Republic of Texas
    MARY JONES: LAST FIRST LADY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS Birney Mark Fish, B.A., M.Div. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2011 APPROVED: Elizabeth Hayes Turner, Major Professor Richard B. McCaslin, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History D. Harland Hagler, Committee Member Denis Paz, Committee Member Sandra L. Spencer, Committee Member and Director of the Women’s Studies Program James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Fish, Birney Mark. Mary Jones: Last First Lady of the Republic of Texas. Doctor of Philosophy (History), December 2011, 275 pp., 3 tables, 2 illustrations, bibliography, 327 titles. This dissertation uses archival and interpretive methods to examine the life and contributions of Mary Smith McCrory Jones in Texas. Specifically, this project investigates the ways in which Mary Jones emerged into the public sphere, utilized myth and memory, and managed her life as a widow. Each of these larger areas is examined in relation to historiographicaly accepted patterns and in the larger context of women in Texas, the South, and the nation during this period. Mary Jones, 1819-1907, experienced many of the key early periods in Anglo Texas history. The research traces her family’s immigration to Austin’s Colony and their early years under Mexican sovereignty. The Texas Revolution resulted in her move to Houston and her first brief marriage. Following the death of her husband she met and married Anson Jones, a physician who served in public posts throughout the period of the Texas Republic. Over time Anson was politically and personally rejected to the point that he committed suicide.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12: the Lone Star Republic
    RepublicThe of Te x a s 1836–1845 Why It Matters As you study Unit 4, you will learn about Texas as a republic. After the creation of the United States from the original 13 colonies, other territories were granted statehood. Only Texas entered the union as a separate and independent nation. The distinctive nature of Texas owes much to its having been a republic before it was a state and to the influence of its settlers. Primary Sources Library See pages 690–691 for primary source readings to accompany Unit 4. Going Visiting by Friedrich Richard Petri (c. 1853) from the Texas Memorial Museum, Austin, Texas. Socializing with neighbors was an important part of community life during the years of the republic. Not all Texas settlers wore buckskin and moccasins as this well-dressed family shows. 264 “Times here are easy… money plenty, the people much better satisfied.” —Dr. Ashbel Smith, December 22, 1837 GEOGRAPHY&HISTORY RICH HERITAGE There are many reasons why people take the big step of leaving their homes and moving to an unknown land— and Texas, during the years 1820 to 1860, witnessed all of them. The newly arriving immigrant groups tended to set- tle in one particular area, since it was easier to work with and live around people who spoke the same language and practiced the same customs. Many Mexicans came north while Texas was still a Spanish territory to set up farms on the fertile Coastal Plains. As A traditional band plays lively German the United States grew, more Native Americans, who had music at the Texas Folklife Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Independence Trail Region, Known As the “Cradle of Texas Liberty,” Comprises a 28-County Area Stretching More Than 200 Miles from San Antonio to Galveston
    n the saga of Texas history, no era is more distinctive or accented by epic events than Texas’ struggle for independence and its years as a sovereign republic. During the early 1800s, Spain enacted policies to fend off the encroachment of European rivals into its New World territories west of Louisiana. I As a last-ditch defense of what’s now Texas, the Spanish Crown allowed immigrants from the U.S. to settle between the Trinity and Guadalupe rivers. The first settlers were the Old Three Hundred families who established Stephen F. Austin’s initial colony. Lured by land as cheap as four cents per acre, homesteaders came to Texas, first in a trickle, then a flood. In 1821, sovereignty shifted when Mexico won independence from Spain, but Anglo-American immigrants soon outnumbered Tejanos (Mexican-Texans). Gen. Antonio López de Santa Anna seized control of Mexico in 1833 and gripped the country with ironhanded rule. By 1835, the dictator tried to stop immigration to Texas, limit settlers’ weapons, impose high tariffs and abolish slavery — changes resisted by most Texans. Texas The Independence ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Trail ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ On March 2, 1836, after more than a year of conclaves, failed negotiations and a few armed conflicts, citizen delegates met at what’s now Washington-on-the-Brazos and declared Texas independent. They adopted a constitution and voted to raise an army under Gen. Sam Houston. TEXAS STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES Gen. Sam Houston THC The San Jacinto Monument towers over the battlefield where Texas forces defeated the Mexican Army. TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Four days later, the Alamo fell to Santa Anna.
    [Show full text]