Ftt:/L/:I T· ' Tj !/ 7- C;
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ftt:/L/:i t· ' tJ !/ 7- c; SEA OT'l:ER SURVEY, KODIAK .ARCHIPELAGO, ALASKA - 1985 Key Words: Sea otter Alaska Kodiak Archipelago Distribution · Abundance lMarine Mammal Management Project Wildlife Assistance U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lOll East Tudor Road Aochorag~, Alaska 99503 2 Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 825 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 i March 1986 INTRODUCTION Historical records indicate that sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were abundant prior to intensive commercial exploitation (1742- 1911). However, by the end of the 19th century sea otters were nearly extinct. By 1911, when sea otters were given complete protection by Federal statute, the populations had been reduced to a few animals at 13 known, but widely separated, sites in the eastern North Pacific (Kenyon 1969). Many of these remnant populations have steadily grown and expanded their ranges. (In some areas this came about through re-introductions.) For the past 30 years the pattern of repopulation of former habitat by sea otters has been monitored by the United States Fish and·Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) through a series of surveys (Lensink 1960; Kenyon 1969; Schneider 1976). Today, many subpopulations are probably at or above historic levels. Increases in subpopulations of sea otters, range expansion into areas also used by humans, and their ability to greatly reduce locally abundant shellfisheries (Ebert 1968; Estes et al. 1978) are causing a growing concern among recreational, commercial, and subsistence users of shellfish in some areas. The Kodiak Archipelago is one of these areas. As the sea otter popHlation increases, problems are expected to arise where human populations are utilizing shellfish resources which otters prey upon. Until recently, sea otters have been absent or at low densities in the vicinity of human populations in Alaska. This situation has now changed. Left unresolved, the problem of high numbers of sea otters (in some subpopulations) will intensify competition between sea otters and hu~an shellfish users. A heightened animosity toward sea otters will lead to increased illegal killing. The 1972 Marine Mammal-Protection Act (MMPA) placed the authority and management responsibility for sea otters under the USFWS. However, the Act presently restricts the Service from "active management" of sea otter populations without first undertaking complicated waiver proceedings. The provisions of the Act do not apply however to the non-wasteful taking of marine mammals by any coastal Alaska Native (for the purposes of subsistence or creating and selling authentic Native handicrafts and clothing). Conceivably, entire populations of sea otters in localized areas could disappear under this "no management" regime. A comprehensive and enforceable management plan is needed to ensure sustainable populations of sea otters over historic ranges. A need exists along the Kodiak Archipelago for increased knowledge of the ecology, distribution, and abundance of sea otters. Competition with commercial fisheries by sea otters has been a problem in the past, can be expected to continue, and will probably increase in the future whether or not human utilization of fish and shellfish resources increases. There has never been a complete survey of sea otter range in Alaska, even after the MMPA was passed in 1972. Limited information from studies in specific areas and casual observational data support the conclusion that sea otters are increasing in recently occupied areas, that there are some sea otters in all of the historic Alaskan range, and, except for southeast Alaska, populations are likely to be, within this decade if not already, at or near carrying capacity ·(Johnson 1982). 1 The objectives of this survey were to obtain current information on the. distribution and relative abundance of the Kodiak Archipelago population, and to identify changes that have occurred since the 1984 survey (Simon-Jackson et al. 1985). This information can be used for predicting future changes likely to cause increasing conflicts with management of important fisheries resources. It will also be used to assist the Service in recommending a management program for sea otters. METHODS The survey was conducted along the coastline, islands, and offshore rocks of Shuyak, Afognak, and the northern coast of Kodiak Island in the Kodiak Arehipelago. The southern end of Kodiak Island was not surveyed du~ to time constraints and the fact that few observations of sea otters have been reported in the area. Surveys were conducted on 12 and 17 September 1985 (T. Simon-Jackson: observer, M. Vivian: pilot) along Raspberry and Afognak Islands; on 23 September 1985 (D. Zwiefelhofer: observer, M. Vivian: pilot) along Kupreanof Strait and the north side of Kodiak Island from Viekoda Bay to Kodiak; and on 25 September 1985 (D. Zwiefelhofer: observer, M. Vivian: pilot) around Shuyak Island, Latax Rocks, and Sea Otter Island. The surveys were flown using a float-equipped single engine, fixed-winged Piper Super Cub aircraft. The surveys were flown at an altitude of 500 feet (152 m) and an airspeed of 85 mph (74 knots), The plane was flown parallel to the shoreline far enough from shore.to provide a good viewing area on both sides of the aircraft, but close enough to readily distinguish otters nearshore. In areas where sea otters scatter over large shallow offshore areas, the plane was flown in a zig-zag pattern over the potential sea otter habitat. Observations were made by both the observer and the pilot. The number and location of otters were recorded by the observer on a map •. All pods of otters greater than 30 were photographed using a 35mm camera, 85-205mm zoom lens, and ASA 400 Ektachrome color slide film for later verification of accuracy of ocular counts. The surveys were only flown when the weather was considered suitable (i.e·. sunny or high overcast, calm waters, and little or no wind). Waters were calm in bays and passages except for slight ripples to light chop on exposed points and shorelines. Gusts and swells were encountered along Seal Islands, Vantage Rock, and Tolstoi Point on Afognak Island. Overall, the weather and visibility were good while surveying. The aerial survey was particularly difficult to complete. In addition to storms, periods of high winds and low ceilings prevented flying. Marine weather patterns for the Kodiak Archipelago during the survey period are given in Table 1. The survey was an attempt to duplicate the survey flown in 1984 I (Simon-Jackson et al. 1985) at approximately the same time of year, but was not completed because of adverse weather conditions (Figure 1, Table 2). We were unable to survey the coastlines of Afognak Island (from Tonk! Bay to Kazakof Bay) and Marmot Island ,due to poor surveying weather. The effect of weather conditions on sea otter distribution and abundance in the Kodiak area is largely speculative at this time. 2 '. Table 1. Local climatological data for Kodiak, Alaska for the month of September, 1985 (U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, WS Form F-6). Day Tem;eerature Precipitation Wind Maximum Minimum (inches) Speed (mph) Peak Gust (mph) Dir. 1 60 48 0 20 25 NW 2 58 42 0 14 22 w 3 53 47 0 12 14 E 4 65 48 0 16 23 NW 5 70 47 0 16 20 NW 6 68 45 0 16 23 lv 7 67 44 0 18 28 sw 8 60 49 0 13 21 NW 9 59 41 0 15 22 NW 10 58 44 0 24 39 NW 11 58 39 0 13 22 NW 12* 54 39 0 12 20 s 13 63 50 0 21 28 sw 14 73 56 0 23 37 sw 15 61 48 0 30 46 w 16 56 45 0 37 51 NW 17* 55 39 0 18 23 w 18 56 45 0 22 31 s 19 56 43 0 31 47 NW 20 55 38 0 26 35 NW 21 50 38 0 30 39 E 22 58 44 0 28 44 E 23* 60 40 0 16 24 sw 24 57 39 0 17 31 NW 25* 52 32 0 13 17 SE 26 56. 47 0 30 40 SE 27 58 43 0 30 36 SE 28 53 38 0 38 46 SE 29 57 43 0 31 52 SE 30 55 41 0 12 18 NW * Date of aerial survey ' 3 Figure 1. Comparison of the distribution and relative abundance of sea otters along the Kodiak Archipelago, 1975-76/1984/1985. #/#/# = numbers observed 1975/numbers observed 1984/numbers observed 1985 -/#/- = area not surveyed in 1975 or 1985 AL:.SKA ' ' ... \. / ···-~. ~~'i<OD I AK -I~- .· . .. , . 4 Table 2. Distribution, relative abundance, and group size of sea otters along the Kodiak Archipelago, 1985. Survey Area No. Seen Group Size Uyak Bay Harvester Island Spiridon Bay Chi~f Pt. to Twocone Pt. Miners Pt. Uganik Passage Viekoda Bay 68 13,14,14,17 Kupreanof Strait 322 3,3,3,4,4,4,4,5,5,6,6,6,6,7,10,12,12, 12,15,26,55,56 Whale Passage 32 30 Afognak Strait 228 3,3,4,4,5,6,9,15,19,50,80 Whale Island 106 5,10,31,49 Kizhuyak Bay 3 Triplets Island 14 5,9 Wooded Island 94 20,34,38 Spruce Island 10 3 Hog Island 103 10,92 Afognak Bay 160 3,3,4,4,8,8,26,41 Kazakof Bay Duck· Bay Cape Izhut to Peril Cape Izhut Bay King Cove Pillar Cape toward Tonki Cape Marmot Island Tonki Cape Tonki Bay Seal Bay 327 3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,6,6,7,8,12,16,17, 20,20,26,40,60 Perenosa Bay 194 3,3,3,3,3,4,4,5,6,6,8,8,40 Shuyak (east) 77 3,3,5,6,32 Sea Otter Island 49 3,4,10,12,14 Point Bay 4 Shuyak (north) 103 3,3,3,3,4,5,5,13,18,22 Latax Rocks 66 4,6,51 Shuyak (west) 221 3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,5,6,6,6,9,10,16,80 Shuyak Strait 31 4 Bluefo:x: Bay 303 3,3,5,5,6,7,8,10,18,30,30,45,87 Foul Bay 60 3,3,3,4,4,5,5 Paramanof Bay 104 3,3,3,4,5,5,5,5,6,8,8,9 I Malina Bay 36 3,6 Raspberry Strait 93 3,5,6,6,7,9,10,15 Raspberry Cape 3 3 Total Otters Seen 2811 5 The activity of animals can have a pronounced effect on the numbers seen.