28 April 2021 Dear Bob Hourigan REFERENCE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

28 April 2021 Dear Bob Hourigan REFERENCE Northern Ireland Office Freedom of Information Team Stormont House Stormont Estate Belfast BT4 3SH T 028 9076 5431 E [email protected] www.gov.uk/nio @niopressoffice 28 April 2021 Dear Bob Hourigan REFERENCE: FOI/21/42 Thank you for your email of 27 March 2021 in which you requested the following information from the Northern Ireland Office: What happened to the Royal portraits of the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh that were formerly displayed in Stormont House before they were removed following staff objections. Where are they now? Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). The portraits of HM the Queen and HRH Prince Philip are part of the collection managed by Historic Royal Palaces, and are located at Hillsborough Castle, the Secretary of State’s Official Residence. At Stormont House, portraits of Her Majesty The Queen are on display in the public area of Stormont House, alongside other images of the Royal family and other artwork celebrating the work of the Department. If you believe this reply is not in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 you may ask for an internal review within two calendar months of the date of this letter. If you request a review you should do so in writing stating the reasons. If following an internal review you were to remain dissatisfied you may make a complaint to the Information Commissioner and ask him to investigate whether the NIO has complied with the terms of the FOIA. You can write to the Information Commissioner at: Information Commissioner Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF The Commissioner will not investigate a complaint unless an internal review procedure has been carried out. Further details on the role of the Information Commissioner and the handling of appeals can be found at: www.ico.org.uk If you wish to discuss this letter or our handling of your request, please contact the Freedom of Information Team using the contact details provided at the top of the first page. Please remember to quote your reference in any correspondence. Thank you for your interest in the Northern Ireland Office. Yours sincerely Freedom of Information Manager .
Recommended publications
  • Freedom of Information Team Northern Ireland Office Stormont House Stormont Estate BT4 3SH
    Freedom of Information Team Northern Ireland Office Stormont House Stormont Estate BT4 3SH T: 02890765431 E: [email protected] www.gov.uk John Kelly [email protected] Freedom of Information Request Dear Mr Kelly, Our Reference: 16/118 Thank you for your email dated 04 October providing clarification of your request for information dated 03 October 2016, in which you requested information from the Northern Ireland Office (NIO): Can you please provide me with any documents/emails/meeting minutes and other forms of information that the Home Office holds that mentions how the status of Irish citizens living & working in the UK may change after Brexit actually takes place. Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). However, because the cost of complying with your request would exceed the limit set by the Freedom of Information Act, on this occasion we are afraid that we will not be taking your request further. The law allows us to decline to answer FOI requests when we estimate it would cost us more than £600 (equivalent to 3½ working days’ worth of work, calculated at £25 per hour) to identify, locate, extract, and then provide the information that has been asked for. You can find out more about Section 12(1) by reading the extract from the Act and some guidance points we consider when applying this exemption, attached at the end of this letter. You can also find more information by reading the full text of the Act, available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/12.
    [Show full text]
  • Consider This…
    Consider this… Research reflections for the 2016-2021 mandate Editors: Caroline Perry and Tony Marken Graphics: Aidan Stennett Maps : Anne Campbell Foreword Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Service John Power Head of Research and Information Service (RaISe) Foreword To all returning and new Members In Consider This, the Assembly’s Research and Information Service (RaISe) has set out a wide range of issues arising from the last Assembly mandate which I hope will be of interest to both returning and newly elected Members. It does not intend to cover all outstanding matters or set your agenda. It aims instead at engaging you with RaISe, which is an important resource available to you and your staff to support the work that you do in the Assembly and in your constituency. RaISe employs subject specialists and library professionals to provide you with research and information support across the range of Assembly and constituency activities. RaISe can provide information and analysis to help you and your staff deal with constituency matters; prepare for plenary or media debates; scrutinise the work of ministers and departments; consider legislation as it makes its way through the Assembly, or assist in bringing forward your own legislation in a Private Member’s Bill. Whatever your reason for contacting RaISe, we will provide you with a timely, confidential and evidence-based response. Members are invited to participate in RaISe’s Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series (KESS) where academics highlight their latest research findings important to Northern Ireland and the Programme for Government. Details of KESS are published on the Assembly’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Sue Mcallister Director General Room 317 Dundonald House Upper Newtownards Road BELFAST BT4 3SU
    Sue McAllister Director General Room 317 Dundonald House Upper Newtownards Road BELFAST BT4 3SU 18 June 2013 Dear Sue NORTHERN IRELAND PRISON SERVICE – DIRECTOR OF REHABILITATION – SCS GRADE 5 Thank you for your 3 June 2013 letter and subsequent e-mails in relation to your Department’s request for Commissioners’ approval to appoint an individual via secondment to the post of Director of Rehabilitation (SCS Grade 5) by way of exception to the Merit Principle. Appointment under Regulation 3(a) Commissioners have considered your request under Regulation 3(a) of the Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland General Regulations 2007 and paragraph A.20 (i) (c) of Appendix A to the Recruitment Code and note the exceptional circumstances surrounding this request. After careful consideration of the business case presented, I am content, on behalf of Commissioners, to approve the appointment for a period of two years under Regulation 3(a) of the General Regulations 2007. This approval has been granted on the understanding that Corporate HR has been advised that this position is no longer being filled via open competition and that they are content that this post is to be filled by way of the proposed secondment arrangement with the Probation Service and that there are no internal financial issues for the Northern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS). It is also on the understanding that the NIPS job criteria for this secondment is the same as that which was advertised for permanent position. As approval is limited to two years from the date of appointment, I should be grateful if you would advise the Secretariat of the effective start date, when known.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report (Hansard)
    Official Report (Hansard) Tuesday 19 January 2016 Volume 111, No 4 Session 2015-2016 Contents Assembly Business Public Petition: Cairn Wood Forest Park ........................................................................................... 1 Ministerial Statement British-Irish Council: Housing ............................................................................................................ 2 Executive Committee Business Police Pensions (Consequential Provisions) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 ... 6 Rates (Amendment) Bill: Accelerated Passage ............................................................................... 7 Rates (Amendment) Bill: Second Stage ........................................................................................... 9 Departments Bill: Consideration Stage ............................................................................................. 20 Budget 2016-17 ................................................................................................................................. 20 Oral Answers to Questions Employment and Learning ................................................................................................................. 26 Education ........................................................................................................................................... 35 Executive Committee Business Budget 2016-17 (Continued) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Proposals Report
    REVISED PROPOSALS REPORT Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland The Bungalow 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies Stormont House Stormont Estate Belfast BT4 3SH 028 9052 7821 [email protected] www.boundarycommission.org.uk @BCNI2018 JANUARY 2018 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies REVISED PROPOSALS REPORT January 2018 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies REVISED PROPOSALS REPORT CONTENTS CHAPTER Page 1. Introduction 5 The Commission 5 Legislation 5 Revised Proposals 5 Consultations 5 How to respond 6 2. The Legislation 8 Rule 5 8 Rule 7 8 3. The 2018 Review 10 Commencement 10 Constituency modelling 10 Provisional Proposals 10 Revised Proposals 11 Final Recommendations 11 4. Major Themes 12 Changes to existing constituencies 12 Towns and their hinterlands 13 Glengormley/Newtownabbey 13 Belfast 14 Issues beyond our remit 16 REVISED PROPOSALS REPORT 3 5. Names and Designations 17 6. The Revised Proposals 18 Revised Proposals Maps 19 Revised Proposals by Constituency - Belfast East 22 - Belfast North 24 - Belfast South 26 - Belfast West 28 - Causeway 30 - East Antrim 32 - Fermanagh and South Tyrone 34 - Foyle 36 - Mid Antrim 38 - Mid Down 40 - Mid Ulster 42 - Newry and Armagh 44 - North Down 46 - South Antrim 48 - South Down 50 - Upper Bann 52 - West Tyrone 54 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland 56 Appendix 2: Schedule 2, Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 57 Appendix 3: List of respondents 62 4 REVISED PROPOSALS REPORT Chapter 1 Introduction The Commission 1.1 The Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland is an independent non-departmental body constituted under the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 as amended by the Boundary Commissions Act 1992 and the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Entrance ONE WEEKEND OVER 400 PROPERTIES and EVENTS
    Free Entrance ONE WEEKEND OVER 400 PROPERTIES AND EVENTS SATURDAY 13 & SUNDAY 14 SEPTEMBER www.discovernorthernireland.com/ehod EHOD 2014 Message from the Minister Welcome to European Heritage Open Days (EHOD) 2014 This year European Heritage Open Days will take place on the 13th Finally, I wish to use this opportunity to thank all and 14th September. Over 400 properties and events are opening of the owners and guardians of the properties who open their doors, and to the volunteers during the weekend FREE OF CHARGE. Not all of the events are in who give up their time to lead tours and host the brochure so for the widest choice and updates please visit our FREE events. Without your enthusiasm and website www.discovernorthernireland.com/ehod.aspx generosity this weekend event would not be possible. I am extremely grateful to all of you. In Europe, heritage and in particular cultural Once again EHOD will be merging cultural I hope that you have a great weekend. heritage is receiving new emphasis as a heritage with built heritage, to broaden our ‘strategic resource for a sustainable Europe’ 1. Our understanding of how our intangible heritage Mark H Durkan own local heritage, in all its expressions – built has shaped and influenced our historic Minister of the Environment and cultural – is part of us, and part of both the environment. This year, as well as many Arts appeal and the sustainable future of this part of and Culture events (p21), we have new Ireland and these islands. It is key to our partnerships with Craft NI (p7), and Food NI experience and identity, and key to sharing our (p16 & 17).
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information Officer, Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland, Block 1, Knockview Buildings, Stormont Estate Belfast BT4 3SJ
    Freedom of Information Officer, Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland, Block 1, Knockview Buildings, Stormont Estate Belfast BT4 3SJ. 21 June 2021 xxxxxxxxxx Email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Our reference: FOI 150621/044 RE: Request for information under Freedom of Information Act Dear xx xxxxxx, Thank you for your recent Freedom of Information request submitted via email to Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland (CJI) on 15 June 2021. Our understanding of the information you have requested is as follows: The name of the technologies and version used to supply each of the following services: HR; Payroll: L&D; Finance; Procurement and Contact Centre; and if any of the specified services are outsourced, if so, the name of the organisation the services are outsourced to and the contract end date. The services you specified were HR; Payroll: L&D; Finance; Procurement and Contact Centre In response to your request I can confirm the following information is being released. Question 1 CJI maintains its own HR information on its own computer network which is provided by the Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS) Enterprise Shared Services IT Assist Platform. HR files maintained by CJI are a mixture of Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel documents. CJI does not hold information on the technologies used by the NICS Enterprise Shared Services IT Assist Platform. CJI does not operate its own Payroll. CJI’s Payroll services are provided via its sponsor Department the Department of Justice using the NICS HRConnect platform. CJI does does not hold information on the technology or versions used to provide this platform. CJI utilises the NICSHR LInKS system to support the provision of electronic learning and development (L&D) for staff.
    [Show full text]
  • CM 210202 Item 13 Correspondence Report (Including Appendices)
    Title of Correspondence Report: Committee Council Meeting Report Submitted To: Date of 2 February 2021 Meeting: For Decision FOR DECISION or For Information Linkage to Council Strategy (2019-23) Strategic Leader and Champion Theme Outcome Establish key relationships with Government, agencies and potential strategic partners Lead Officer Director of Corporate Services Budgetary Considerations Cost of Proposal Included in Current Year Estimates N/A Capital/Revenue Code Staffing Costs Screening Required for new or revised Policies, Plans, Strategies or Service Requirements Delivery Proposals. Section 75 Screening Yes/No Date: Screening Completed: EQIA Required Yes/No Date: and Completed: Rural Needs Screening Yes/No Date: Assessment Completed (RNA) RNA Required and Yes/No Date: Completed: Data Screening Yes/No Date: Protection Completed: Impact 210202 CM Correspondence Page 1 of 4 Assessment DPIA Required Yes/No Date: (DPIA) and Completed: 1.0 Purpose of Report The purpose of the report is to present correspondence for Members’ consideration. 2.0 The following are listed: 2.1 Northern Ireland Housing Council correspondence dated 18th January 2021 The Minutes of The 475th Northern Ireland Housing Council meeting held on 10th December 2020 and January Bulletin are attached for information. 2.2 Fermanagh and Omagh District Council correspondence dated 4th December 2020 At a Meeting of Fermanagh and Omagh District Council held on 1st December Council approved the following Motion:- “Due to the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic, Fermanagh and Omagh
    [Show full text]
  • Stormont Estate
    24030 makeup 24/9/06 4:11 pm Page 40 Stormont Estate Photograph courtesy of Mike Hartwell Route description A walk through attractive woodland and parkland with many interesting features, following both surfaced and unsurfaced paths with some hills. Distance 2.5miles 4 km. Average Time 1hr 45 mins – 2hrs. Access By bus - Metro Services; 4, 20, 20A. By car - Car park off the Upper Newtownards Road past the main gates near the sports pitches. Trail Route This route follows the waymarked “Long may wish to make a short diversion to the top to Woodland Walk” through the grounds of the admire the views down into the steep ravine. estate. Follow the orange coloured arrows around the grounds. Follow the path round to the Reconciliation Follow the gravel path from the car park past the sculpture (4) then across the grass to Massey playground, keeping left. Cross the Prince of Avenue. After pausing to admire the Carson Wales Avenue (1) and continue through the statue and Parliament Buildings (5) walk about woodland (2), skirting the Stormont Estate (3) half way down the Prince of Wales Avenue before boundary. turning left. Follow the path around the wildlife refuge and sports pitches back to the car park. Turn left up the hill, then left again and cross the bridge. Follow the path until it reaches open parkland. Go round the base of the bank and cross Massey Avenue. At the Gleaner sculpture turn right and follow this path up through the glen. Before turning right to return down the glen, you 24030 makeup 24/9/06 4:11 pm Page 41 Trail 17 Parliament Buildings History 4 Parliament buildings and 5 the processional avenue were designed by the Massey Avenue Entrance Toilet architect Arnold Thornley.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015/89/52 Creation Date(S): 6 November 1985 Extent and Medium
    NATIONAL ARCHIVES IRELAND Reference Code: 2015/89/52 Creation Date(s): 6 November 1985 Extent and medium: 19 pages Creator(s): Department of the Taoiseach Access Conditions: Open Copyright: National Archives, Ireland. May only be reproduced with the written permission of the Director of the National Archives. , ...... .' . Ministerial Meeting at FCO, London Wednesday, 6 November 1985 The meeting began about 3.35 pm and ended about 5.20 pm. Those present were Irish side: The Tanaiste, (Mr Spring), the Minister for Foreign Affairs, (Mr Barry), and Messrs Nally, Donlon, Lillis and Dorr; British side: The Foreign secretary, (Sir Geoffrey Howe), the Northern Ireland Secretary, (Mr Tom King), Sir Robert Armstrong and Messrs Andrew, Goodall and Clark (Head of Republic of Ireland Department). The following is not a verbatim note but a reconstruction in the form of direct speech from fairly detailed notes. Howe Thank you very much for coming. I don't know who should speak first? Tanaiste I think you should - we came at your invitation. King There are various points. Certain points of some significance which came up in the official level discussions yesterday have to be thrashed out but I will leave that until later. The first thing I want to put on record is that there are two things which make the Agreement worth while for us (i) the clear possibility of reassuring the majority in Northern Ireland about status. You may have seen what I said yesterday. It was the message I have to keep pumping out - that there will be no sellout. Tbat issue, for the reasons discussed (by officials on the previous evening?) still has difficulties for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Records
    RESEARCHING YOUR IRISH ANCESTORS AT HOME AND ABROAD DAVID R. ELLIOTT CONTENTS Acknowledgements Introduction Chapter One: Understanding Religion and Politics in Ireland Chapter Two: Finding Clues to the County in Ireland Chapter Three: Zeroing in on the Parish and Townland Chapter Four: Strategies for Travel to and Within Ireland Chapter Five: Sleuthing the Irish Archival Centres Chapter Six: Putting Flesh on Your Irish Ancestral Skeletons Chapter Seven: Digging Around in Irish Graveyards Conclusion Appendix A: What to Research Before You Go to Ireland Appendix B: Things to Research While in Ireland Appendix C: Historical and Genealogical Websites for Irish Research Annotated Bibliography ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS n doing my research in Ireland, I have learned greatly from the important tips and prior research I of friends and genealogy speakers: Sunday Thompson, Richard Doherty, Elayne Lockhart, and John Grenham. I also owe much to Valerie Adams — formerly of PRONI and now librarian of the Presbyterian Historical Society in Belfast — for her friendship and the support of our work. Many thanks go to the staff members at PRONI, whom I came to know while delivering genealogical training lectures there. Having a personal relationship with archival staff always makes the research go much easier. The National Archives and National Library in Dublin also went out of their way to give assistance. Formerly with the Enniskillen Public Library and now with the library system in County Tyrone, Margaret Kane was an important resource in my early research in County Fermanagh. I have been privileged to lecture to the County Fermanagh Family History Society and have learned much from its members; I cherish their friendship, especially Viola Wiggins, Frank McHugh, Mervyn Hall, and P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: the Coleraine University Controversy Developing the Ability to Think Critically by Exploring Causation with Students Spring 2021
    Leaving Certificate Subject Support Case study: The Coleraine University controversy Developing the ability to think critically by exploring causation with students Spring 2021 Efforts have been made to trace and acknowledge copyright holders. In cases where a copyright has been inadvertently overlooked, the copyright holders are requested to contact [email protected] Note: Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the historical data contained herein. Any inadvertent errors are regretted. Please cite as: PDST, History Case Study: The Coleraine University controversy, Dublin, 2021 History Case Study: The Coleraine University controversy © PDST, 2021 Contents Page Case Study: The Coleraine University controversy Developing the ability to think critically 4 The enquiry-focused approach 4 Linking your work on the case study to the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategy 5 An overview of the case study 6 Glossary of important terms: develop your historical literacy skills 7 Biographical notes 10 Timeline of important developments 16 Bibliography 18 Useful websites 19 The Coleraine University controversy: a possible line of enquiry 20 A possible hook (a film clip) 20 Film clip transcript 21 Questions and points for discussion on the film clip 23 Enquiry, Stage 1: Why was the decision taken in 1965 to locate the new university in Coleraine? 24 Enquiry, Stage 2: Why did the decision cause controversy? 31 Audio-visual source (with transcript and questions) 39 Enquiry, Stage 3: What is the historical significance of this controversy? 47 A critical skills exercise 54 Historians’ views on the Coleraine University controversy 58 Interrogating the historians 60 Your conclusions on the enquiry 61 3 History Case Study: The Coleraine University controversy © PDST, 2021 The Coleraine University Controversy: Developing the ability to think critically by exploring historical causation and significance with students In exploring the case study, The Coleraine University controversy, students are following a narrative of events.
    [Show full text]