DOCSLIB.ORG

Case No COMP/M.3230 - STATOIL / BP / SONATRACH / in SALAH JV

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case No COMP/M.3230 - STATOIL / BP / SONATRACH / in SALAH JV EN Case No COMP/M.3230 - STATOIL / BP / SONATRACH / IN SALAH JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/12/2003 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 303M3230 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.12.2003 SG (2003) D/233834/233835/233836 In the published version of this decision, PUBLIC VERSION some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential MERGER PROCEDURE information. The omissions are shown ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying parties : Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.3230 – Statoil/BP/Sonatrach/ In Salah JV Notification of 20.11.2003 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/891 1. On 20.11.2003, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97, by which the undertakings Statoil ASA (“Statoil”, Norway), controlled by the Norwegian State; BP plc (“BP”, UK); and Société Nationale pour la recherche, la production, le transport, la transformation et la commercialisation des hydrocarbures (“Sonatrach”, Algeria), belonging to the Algerian State, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertakings In Salah Gas Limited and In Salah Gas (Services) Limited (together “In Salah JV”, Channel Islands), currently jointly owned and controlled by BP and Sonatrach, by way of purchase of interests. 2. After examining the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and that it does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989 p. 1; corrigendum OJ L 257 of 21.9.1990, p. 13; Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97 (OJ L 180, 9. 7. 1997, p. 1, corrigendum OJ L 40, 13.2.1998, p. 17). Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium. Telephone: (32-2) 299 11 11. I. THE PARTIES 3. BP is the holding company of a multi-national exploration, petroleum and petrochemical group. Statoil, which is controlled by the Norwegian State, is involved in the exploration for and production of oil and gas, the supply of gas, the delivery of energy and products to retail markets, and the processing of petroleum. Sonatrach is a wholly owned company of the Algerian State operating in the field of exploration, production, transportation, processing and world-wide commercialisation of hydrocarbons. The joint venture In Salah is currently jointly controlled by BP and Sonatrach. In Salah is active in the exploration, development, production and expects first gas to occur in 2004 from the In Salah region in Southern Algeria. II. THE OPERATION 4. The proposed transaction consists of the sale of a half of BP’s 49% interest in the In Salah JV to Statoil as a result of which Statoil and BP on the one side will acquire joint control of the In Salah JV together with Sonatrach on the other side. Each of BP, Sonatrach and Statoil will then jointly control the JV. 5. In 1996 the Commission cleared the establishment of the joint venture2 pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation 4064/89. III. CONCENTRATION 6. Based on the above it can be concluded that the proposed transaction constitutes a concentration under Article 3(1)(b) of Council Regulation 4064/89. IV. COMMUNITY DIMENSION 7. The undertakings concerned have a combined aggregate world-wide turnover of more than EUR 5 billion3. Each of BP, Sonatrach and Statoil have a Community-wide turnover in excess of EUR 250 million (BP €[…] million, Sonatrach €[…] million, Statoil €[…] million), but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate Community-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension. V. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT 8. As will be shown below, the operation will not create nor strengthen a dominant position. This applies whether or not one takes account of the proposed transaction notified to the Commission on 20 November 2003 in case COMP/M.3288 – BP- TNK/Sibneft/Slavneft. Horizontal effects 9. Upstream activities comprise various types of commercial activity: the finding of new reserves, the development of those reserves and, finally, the commercial exploitation of those reserves. The finding of new reserves is generally described as “exploration”. 2 Case No. IV/M.672. 3 Turnover calculated in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Merger Regulation and the Commission Notice on the calculation of turnover (OJ C66, 2.3.1998, p25). 2 Development concerns the setting up of adequate infrastructure for future production (e.g. pipelines, terminals, etc.). The exploitation of reserves is called “production and sales”. Gas and oil Exploration 10. In Exxon/Mobil4, the Commission considered that gas and oil exploration constituted a separate worldwide market distinct from the development, production and sale of natural gas. The parties agree with this market definition. 11. The joint venture relates to the exploration of natural gas in only one licensed area, the In Salah region. On the basis of capital expenditure, this is a small proportion (less than 1%) of total worldwide oil and gas exploration. Even taking into account all BP, Sonatrach and Statoil activities, these still constitute less than 10% of the worldwide market. (BP: [<5] %; Sonatrach: [<1] % and Statoil [<2] %). Development, production and sale of natural gas 12. In Exxon/Mobil the Commission identified the relevant product market and geographic market as being the development, production and sale of natural gas in the EEA and, possibly, Russia and Algeria. The parties follow Commission’s past practice in approaching the definition of the relevant product and geographic markets. 13. Natural gas exported by the In Salah JV will be sold at the border between Algeria and Tunisia or Morocco. Strictly speaking therefore such sales are made to customers located outside of the EEA/Algeria/Russia market. However, these customers typically sell the gas into the EEA. Accordingly, the parties have provided market shares estimates attributing such sales to the EEA/Algeria/Russian market. 14. The In Salah JV itself accounts for only around 1 % of the EEA/Algeria/Russia market and approximately 2% in the EEA alone. Combining actual sales for BP, Statoil, Sonatrach and anticipated sales for the In Salah JV in 2005 the parties combined share (based on 2001 market size) is approximately 16% (BP: [0-5]%; Statoil: [0-5]%; Sonatrach: [0-10]%; In Salah: [around 1]%). If the geographic market was to be the EEA, the parties combined market share is 27%. (BP: [0-10]%; Statoil: [0-10]%; Sonatrach: [10-20]%; In Salah: [around 2]%). 15. In any case, the combined entity will face significant competition from important suppliers such as Gazprom ([50-60]% in EEA/Algeria/Russia and [10-20]% in EEA), ExxonMobil ([0-10]% in EEA/Algeria/Russia and [10-20]% in EEA) and Shell ([0- 10]% in EEA/Algeria/Russia and [0-10]% in EEA). Vertical effects and risk of co-ordination 16. The parties state that the joint venture will only account for [around 1]% of the EEA/Algeria/Russia gas market. In the EEA alone, the JV’s share would be [around 2]% Based on this the vertical effects of the proposed transaction will be insignificant. Even if one were to take account of highest possible combined market share ([20- 30]%, paragraph 14 above), there would still not be any foreclosure effect likely to create or strengthen a dominant position on downstream markets. 4 Case No IV/M.1383 3 17. Insofar as the JV’s parents are active on the same markets outside the In Salah joint venture, especially in the supply of gas to interruptible customers and the supply of gas to large industrial and commercial customers in Great Britain, the proposed transaction will not create competition concerns such as those envisaged by Article 2(4) of the ECMR. This is because the combined market share will in any event remain below 40% on any market, so that co-ordination of the relevant activities remains unlikely. VI. CONCLUSION 18. For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. For the Commission Mario MONTI Member of the Commission 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Algeria Upstream OG Report.Pub
    ALGERIA UPSTREAM OIL & GAS REPORT Completed by: M. Smith, Sr. Commercial Officer, K. Achab, Sr. Commercial Specialist, and B. Olinger, Research Assistant Introduction Regulatory Environment Current Market Trends Technical Barriers to Trade and More Competitive Landscape Upcoming Events Best Prospects for U.S. Exporters Industry Resources Introduction Oil and gas have long been the backbone of the Algerian economy thanks to its vast oil and gas reserves, favorable geology, and new opportunities for both conventional and unconventional discovery/production. Unfortunately, the collapse in oil prices beginning in 2014 and the transition to spot market pricing for natural gas over the last three years revealed the weaknesses of this economic model. Because Algeria has not meaningfully diversified its economy since 2014, oil and gas production is even more essential than ever before to the government’s revenue base and political stability. Today’s conjoined global health and economic crises, coupled with persistent declining production levels, have therefore placed Algeria’s oil and gas industry, and the country, at a critical juncture where it requires ample foreign investment and effective technology transfer. One path to the future includes undertaking new oil and gas projects in partnership with international companies (large and small) to revitalize production. The other path, marked by inertia and institutional resistance to change, leads to oil and gas production levels in ten years that will be half of today's production levels. After two decades of autocracy, Algeria’s recent passage of a New Hydrocarbons Law seems to indicate that the country may choose the path of partnership by profoundly changing its tax and investment laws in the hydrocarbons sector to re-attract international oil companies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative History of Oil and Gas Markets and Prices: Is 2020 Just an Extreme Cyclical Event Or an Acceleration of the Energy Transition?
    April 2020 A Comparative History of Oil and Gas Markets and Prices: is 2020 just an extreme cyclical event or an acceleration of the energy transition? Introduction Natural gas markets have gone through an unprecedented transformation. Demand growth for this relatively clean, plentiful, versatile and now relatively cheap fuel has been increasing faster than for other fossil fuels.1 Historically a `poor relation’ of oil, gas is now taking centre stage. New markets, pricing mechanisms and benchmarks are being developed, and it is only natural to be curious about the direction these developments are taking. The oil industry has had a particularly rich and well recorded history, making it potentially useful for comparison. However, oil and gas are very different fuels and compete in different markets. Their paths of evolution will very much depend on what happens in the markets for energy sources with which they compete. Their history is rich with dominant companies, government intervention and cycles of boom and bust. A common denominator of virtually all energy industries is a tendency towards natural monopoly because they have characteristics that make such monopolies common. 2 Energy projects tend to require multibillion – often tens of billions of - investments with long gestation periods, with assets that can only be used for very specific purposes and usually, for very long-time periods. Natural monopolies are generally resolved either by new entrants breaking their integrated market structures or by government regulation. Historically, both have occurred in oil and gas markets.3 As we shall show, new entrants into the oil market in the 1960s led to increased supply at lower prices, and higher royalties, resulting in the collapse of control by the major oil companies.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST QUARTER RESULTS January – March 2020
    FIRST QUARTER RESULTS January – March 2020 CONTENTS: 1. Highlights 2. Backlog 3. Consolidated Income Statement 4. Consolidated Balance Sheet Appendix: Alternative Performance Metrics First Quarter Results January – March 2020 1. MAIN HIGHLIGHTS ▪ Backlog of €10.9 billion ▪ Q1 2020 Order intake of €1.9 billion ▪ Sales at €1,181 million ▪ Operating profit (EBIT) at €23.7 million, with a 2.0% EBIT margin ▪ Net profit at €8.7 million ▪ Net cash position of €419 million Backlog at the end of March stood at €10.9 billion. In Q1 2020, the main award added to the backlog was the important refining project for Sonatrach at Haoud el-Hamra, Hassi Messaoud (Algeria), with a value of $2 billion for Técnicas Reunidas. Total sales reached €1,181 million in Q1 2020, growing 29% versus Q1 2019. Sales in the last month of the quarter were slightly affected by Covid-19 disruptions. Q1 2020 EBIT was €23.7 million, that compares to the Q1 2019 EBIT of €10.6 million, with an increase of 124% year on year. Growth in operating profit was favoured by the contribution of newer projects with healthier margins and despite the slowdown of project execution due to Covid in the last month of the quarter. Net profit in Q1 2020 reached €8.7 million, a 134% higher than in the same period of last year. Net cash position at the end of March stood at €419 million. The healthy cash position reflects the maintenance of a good progress in working capital, with no cash downpayments being received in the quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • The In-Salah CCS Experience
    The First International Conference on the Clean Development Mechanism Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (The Intercontinental Hotel) 26-28 Shaaban, 1427, 19-21 September 2006 EU-OPEC Roundtable on Carbon Dioxide Capture & Storage.. Session 2: Prospects of CCS in OPEC Member Countries and the EU. TheThe In-SalahIn-Salah CCSCCS experienceexperience Sonatrach,Sonatrach, AlgeriaAlgeria RedouaneRedouane HADDADJIHADDADJI Sonatrach,Sonatrach, AlgeriaAlgeria 1 1 / 34 SonatrachSonatrach && ClimateClimate ChangeChange 2 2 / 34 WhoWho isis SonatrachSonatrach ?? Created in 1963 232 Million TOE produced in 2005. Processing Capacity z Liquefaction of NG : 45 Mm3/year z LPG Separation : 9.1 MT/year In Salah z Refining : 21.3 MT/year Transportation Network z 14 500 Km of oil, gas LPG and condensate pipelines 3 / 34 WhoWho isis SonatrachSonatrach ?? Sonatrach is the Algerian National Oil & Gas company z 11th largest oil company z 1st African company z 3rd largest NG exporter z 1st largest LNG exporter 4 / 34 EnvironmentalEnvironmental protectionprotection atat SonatrachSonatrach Sonatrach adopted few years ago; an ambitious Heath, Safety & Environmental (HSE) Policy. It shows a strong commitment to protect the Environment and to contribute to the sustainable development effort of the country. One of the main environmental objectives of Sonatrach is reducing atmospheric pollution including greenhouse gases 5 / 34 SonatrachSonatrach’’ss effortsefforts toto tackletackle climateclimate changechange Associated gas flaring reduction Carbon Capture & Storage projects program Voluntary projects Voluntary efforts since 1970 z First experience: In Salah gas Project GGFR member (CDM project) z Second experience: Gassi -Touil Integrated Project Flaring rates of associated gas 1995 - 2005 35% 33% 31% 30% 29% 25% 23% 20% 20% 17% 15% 13% 13% 11% 9% 10% 7% 5% 0% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 6 / 34 InIn SalahSalah GasGas ProjectProject 7 7 / 34 InIn SalahSalah GasGas ProjectProject In Salah Gas (ISG) is a Joint Venture between : z Sonatrach (35%), z BP (33%) z Statoil (32%).
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report on Form 20-F
    United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 Commission file number 1-32575 Royal Dutch Shell plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands tel. no: (011 31 70) 377 9111 (Address of principal executive offices) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Receipts representing Class A ordinary shares of the New York Stock Exchange issuer of an aggregate nominal value €0.07 each American Depositary Receipts representing Class B ordinary shares of the New York Stock Exchange issuer of an aggregate nominal value of €0.07 each Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act None Securities For Which There is a Reporting Obligation Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Outstanding as of December 31, 2005: 3,817,240,213 Class A ordinary shares of the nominal value of €0.07 each. 2,707,858,347 Class B ordinary shares of the nominal value of €0.07 each. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 3/6/06 2:28 PM Page 1
    01-7473-6 Introduction 3/6/06 2:28 PM Page 1 Introduction In most important oil-producing regions of the world, the oil industry has been nationalized. Ninety percent of the world’s oil reserves are entrusted to state-owned companies. The five national oil companies (NOCs) that are the focus of this book together produce one quarter of the world’s oil and hold one half of the world’s oil and gas reserves. What do we know about these oil titans? Do we understand how they operate and what drives them? Do they emphasize politics over profits? Do they have the technical and business skills to develop responsibly the immense petroleum resources entrusted to them? In spite of the dependence of importing countries’ economic fortunes on the performance of the NOCs of the Middle East and North Africa, outsiders know very little about these organizations. Their opacity has discouraged most analysis so far. However, after explaining my project, I was invited to meet with the managers of Saudi Aramco, the Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC), the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), Sonatrach (Algeria) and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC). They allowed extensive interviews to be conducted, demonstrating their interest in discussing both their past accomplishments and future challenges. These were fascinating dis- cussions, and this book will tell those companies’ stories. From the oil industry’s perspective, it is an important time to be studying NOCs. Many of them are emerging on the international scene, no longer con- fined to filling the shoes of the oil majors, which left when the host countries nationalized their oil sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions Platts Global Crude Oil Osps Latest Update: May 2021
    Frequently Asked Questions Platts Global Crude Oil OSPs Latest update: May 2021 What is an Official Selling Price (OSP)? 2 What does an OSP premium (or discount) represent? 2 When are OSPs published? 2 How does Platts use OSPs? 2 www.spglobal.com/platts Frequently Asked Questions Platts Global Crude Oil OSPs: May 2021 as the spot price marker for crudes shipped to Asia and Brent Platts publishes both the monthly OSP differential once it is What is an Official Selling Price (OSP)? for crude oil shipped to Europe. Frequently, NOCs will release released and an outright price once the full pricing month has Many state-owned oil companies (NOCs) price crude oil sales to different OSPs for different refining regions. OSPs are normally passed. Using the example above, Platts will publish the August long-term customers using an official selling price (OSP) for each announced as a premium or discount to a monthly average OSP differentials for Arab Medium in July, but will not publish of their major crude streams. These OSPs are typically set by each for the relevant price markers. This differential is meant to the outright August OSP until the first working day of September, oil company on a monthly basis after an official meeting and then capture any differences in quality, supply and demand, and any once all days in August have been priced. circulated to long-term customers. OSPs are generally only sent to differences between the loading period of the crude oil being the registered lifters of the company’s crude grade, joint venture priced and the reference spot market.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Oil Strategic Management Dissertation
    STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR MANAGING THE TRANSITION FROM PEAK OIL TO A REDUCED PETROLEUM ECONOMY BY SARAH K. ODLAND STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR MANAGING THE TRANSITION FROM PEAK OIL TO A REDUCED PETROLEUM ECONOMY BY SARAH K. ODLAND JUNE 2006 ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED AS A MASTER’S THESIS TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING, MERCY COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MAY 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND CHARTS v LIST OF TABLES vii PREFACE viii INTRODUCTION ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM 1 PART I THE BIG ROLLOVER: ONSET OF A PETROLEUM DEMAND GAP AND SWITCH TO A SELLERS’ MARKET CHAPTER 1 WHAT”S OIL EVER DONE FOR YOU? (AND WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF IT STOPPED DOING IT?) 5 Oil: Cheap Energy on Demand - Oil is Not Just a Commodity - Heavy Users - Projected Demand Growth for Liquid Petroleum - Price Elasticity of Oil Demand - Energy and Economic Growth - The Dependence of Productivity Growth on Expanding Energy Supplies - Economic Implications of a Reduced Oil Supply Rate CHAPTER 2 REALITY CHECK: TAKING INVENTORY OF PETROLEUM SUPPLY 17 The Geologic Production of Petroleum - Where the Oil Is and Where It Goes - Diminishing Marginal Returns of Production - Hubbert’s Peak: World Oil Production Peaking and Decline - Counting Oil Inventory: What’s in the World Warehouse? - Oil Resources versus Accessible Reserves - Three Camps: The Peak Oilers, Official Agencies, Technology Optimists - Liars’ Poker: Got Oil? - Geopolitical Realities of the Distribution of Remaining World
    [Show full text]
  • World Oil: Market Or Mayhem?
    Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 23, Number 3—Summer 2009—Pages 145–164 World Oil: Market or Mayhem? James L. Smith nergy analysts sometimes speak of oil’s “golden era,” that 100-year stretch between 1874 and 1974 when the real price was relatively stable within a E range from $10 to $20 per barrel (BP, 2008) in 2007 dollars. Figure 1 shows that in recent decades, that stability has ended. In October 1973, several Arabic members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) announced that in response to U.S. support for Israel during the 1973 Arab–Israeli war, they would place an embargo on oil exports to the United States. That action caused real oil prices to soar from $12 to $53 per barrel within four months. Later in the 1970s, political turmoil in Iran and the Iran–Iraq war again rattled the market and by January 1981 pushed the real price up to $95. Eventually, oil prices fell back to earth with a thud, bottoming out at $21 per barrel in July 1986. The roller coaster ride of prices has continued more recently. After oil prices skidded to a low of $12 per barrel in December 1998 in the wake of the Asian financial crisis, oil stabilized again around $30 during 2000–2004 before a breathtaking ascent that reached $145 per barrel by July 2008—only to dip below $40 per barrel again before the end of 2008. A unique combination of economic circumstances surrounds oil markets. A short list would include extremely high price volatility; the prominent role and unusual longevity of a major cartel (OPEC); the absolute size and scope of the oil industry and its important links to industrialization, economic growth, and the global distribution of wealth; nagging doubts about the sustainability of the re- source base; substantial volumes of petroleum-related CO2 emissions that pull oil y James L.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEC Petroleum
    OPEC th International Seminar Petroleum: An Engine for Global Development 3–4 June 2015 Hofburg Palace Vienna, Austria Contact: 50 +44 7818 598178 www.opecseminar.org [email protected] Case for cooperation never stronger When OPEC’s Oil and Energy Ministers gathered in Vienna for the But there are some pertinent facts to consider here. As OPEC 166th Meeting of their Ordinary Conference towards the end of Secretary General, Abdalla Salem El-Badri, pointed out at the press November, they were confronted by the largest assembly of jour- conference — for the past few years, the Organization has more nalists, photographers and analysts the Organization’s relatively- or less been producing what it said it would — 30m b/d. That has new Headquarters in the Austrian capital’s historic First District been the call on the Organization’s oil and that is what its Members Commentary has ever seen. In fact, such was the response to the end-of-year have produced — and will continue to produce in the first half of Ministerial talks that the customary ‘meet and greet’ of the Ministers, 2015. The epitome of stability, one would say. But what of the oil held especially for the media ahead of the plenary session, had to producers outside the Organization? Again the OPEC communiqué: be staggered for safety reasons. “… although world oil demand is forecast to increase during the For the past few years OPEC Ministerial Meetings have, by year 2015, this will, yet again, be offset by the projected increase comparison, been quite muted affairs, as far as the international of 1.36m b/d in non-OPEC supply … giving indications of an ex- press is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Associated Gas Flaring and Venting
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized A Public-PrivatePartnership Flaring Reduction Global Gas A GlobalOverviewandLessons FLARING ANDVENTING: GAS OFASSOCIATED REGULATION World Bank Group World Regulation of Associated Gas Flaring and Venting A Global Overview and Lessons from International Experience THE WORLD BANK Report Number 3 - World Bank Group Acknowledgments This report is one of the outputs of the Global Initiative on Natural Gas Fla ring Reduction (GGFR). 1 The GGFR aims to support national governments and the petroleum industry in their efforts to reduce flaring and venting of gas associated with the extraction of crude oil. The GGFR was transformed into the Global Gas Flaring Reduction Public-Private Partnership at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg in August 2002. The existing partners at the time of the WSSD were the Bank, Shell, BP, Sonatrach of Algeria, and the governments of Ecuador, Nigeria, and Norway. Since then, the governments of Angola, Cameroon, Indonesia, and the United States, as well as Chevron Texaco, ExxonMobil, Norsk Hydro, Statoil, ENI, and TOTAL, have joined the GGFR. The first Steering Committee meeting, held in December 2002, approved a three-year work program and budget for the GGFR, which included assisting countries in developing relevant gas flaring and venting regulations. This report provides a global overview of regulatory practices on gas flaring and venting and draws relevant lessons
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Algeria in 2011
    2011 Minerals Yearbook ALGERIA U.S. Department of the Interior September 2013 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF ALGERIA By Mowafa Taib In 2011, Algeria ranked first and third in Africa in natural gas Ordinance No. 06–10 of July 29, 2006, which regulates production and crude oil output, respectively. Algeria ranked natural gas and petroleum operations, is a supplement to law fourth in the world in terms of the volume of natural gas exports No. 05–07 of April 28, 2005. The law grants Sonatrach S.p.A. and accounted for 2.4% and 1.9% of the world’s natural gas and 51% ownership of all hydrocarbon projects in the country. crude oil output, respectively. The country held 4.5 trillion cubic Environmental laws applicable to the mineral industry include meters of proved natural gas reserves, which was 2.2% of the law No. 03–10 of July 19, 2003, and associated decrees, and world’s total proven reserves, and 12.2 billion barrels of proven law No. 05–12 of September 4, 2005. Ordinance No. 07–02 of crude oil reserves, which was 0.7% of the world’s total reserves March 1, 2007, amends and supplements the Mining Law. The (BP p.l.c., 2012, p. 6, 8, 20, 22). Mining Law guarantees parity for all investors; allows separate In addition to hydrocarbons, Algeria produced barite, surface and underground mine tenure; ensures that disputes bentonite and other clays, cement, crushed stone, diatomite, can be appealed to international arbitrators; gives incentives dolomite, gold, gravel, gypsum, helium, iron ore, lime, marble, for importing equipment for mining operations; and provides nitrogen fertilizer, phosphate rock, pozzolan, quartz, salt, custom-tariff exemptions and rebates on mineral extraction sand, silver, and steel.
    [Show full text]